Military Review

The project of dismemberment of Russia and backstage power

39
The project of dismemberment of Russia and backstage powerThe ideas of globalization in Europe coincided with the ideas of economic expansion and the conquest of the markets of the ideologues of Central Europe. The solution could be the creation of a single economic space, which at the beginning of the 20th century was written by the ideologist of “Belgianism” Leon Hennebig.
From here, the interest of the “pan-European union” to Hitler, about which Yalmar Schacht informed his colleagues, is not surprising: “After three months, Hitler will be in power. He will create a Pan-Europe ... Only Hitler can create a Pan-Europe. "


This plan was preceded and developed in parallel by the project “League of the World’s Realization”, which was attributed to Woodrow Wilson, who was co-authored by journalist Walter Lippmann. Senator Owen Jung, the author of the plan of the same name, painted an arsenal of funds provided by the League for world domination: international court and arbitration, the use of collective armed forces, the possibility of financial and trade blockade against "non-subordinate countries."

According to a number of lobbyists, the possibilities of the League and the provisions of the Versailles Treaty opened up European markets for the US, and the new system of mandates access to the colonies, which, apparently, included Russia, which the project, which acquired the final name of “League of Nations”, was not widely considered.

But the American delegation brought to the Paris Conference, summing up the First World War (which was held intermittently from 18 in January 1919 of the year to 21 in January of 1920), a map with new frontiers of the Russian state, where Moscow was left Central Russian Upland, cut off the Baltic States, Belarus, Ukraine, the Caucasus , Central Asia, Siberia.

In October 1926, at the First Congress of the Pan-European Movement, Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi was elected International President of the Pan-European Union, 5 September 1929, at the meeting of the Geneva League of Nations, the question of creating a Federation of European Nations was already raised. In Basel, at the Third Pan-European Congress in October 1932, Coudenhove-Kalergi put forward a thesis about an uncompromising attitude towards Stalin, but what is more remarkable - also to Hitler, who is gaining momentum.

There was a split in the elites, where its American part about Europe had a different plan, the existence of which is confirmed by the defeat of the secretariat of the Pan-European Union in Vienna after the seizure of Austria. Coudenhove-Kalergi runs to Switzerland, the fifth congress is already in New York on 1943.

Both projects created "Pan-Europe", the stumbling block was the question of the conductor's baton. The industrial association was the score of an alternative to a financial association: Interessen Gemeinschaft was outlined at the end of August 1916, when Bayer, BASF, Agfa, Hoechst, Kale and Cassella, Griesheim Elektron and Weiler-ter-Meer ”finally wished to become allies and the shape of the future alliance was designated. December 25 Bayer, BASF, Agfa, Hoechst, Griesheim Elektron and Weiler-ter-Meer signed a full cooperation agreement, Kale and Cassella, formally independent, adhered to hotel agreement “Interessen Gemeinschaft Farbenwerke der Deutschen Teerfarbenindustrie” or “IG Farben”.

The name Farben, an abbreviation IG, stands for Interssen Gemeinschaft, which means “community of interests,” and Farben, apparently in memory of the industry that gave rise to concern, means “colors.” Officially, the process of recreating the concern is led by Carl Bosch and Carl Duisberg. There is no direct evidence on what conditions IG Farben was recreated, but a remarkable fact is that in 1927, the head office of the new monopolist was rebuilt in Frankfurt am Main on the lands from the 1837 of the Rothschilds.

It was built with money from the Dillon, Read and Company banking group, owned by the Warburgs. The main bank serving the interests of IG Farben was Deutsche Bank, which had long-standing relationships with BASF and Farbwerke vorm. Friedr. Bayer & Co. ”, one of the members of the bank's board of directors was a member of the corresponding body“ IG Farben ”. During the Second World War, it will be Hermann Josef Abs, who during the described period still held the position of deputy, and again Warburg was the honorary chairman.

Officially investigating IG’s activities, Richard Sesuly (Richard Sasuly) describes the new IG building as follows: “The IG headquarters in Frankfurt was located in a new building large enough to accommodate an entire ministry. IG Far¬benindustri was almost an independent power. " 39 directors of the coalition of enterprises included in the Supervisory Board of the Aufsichtsrat, where Karl Duisberg was elected as the first chairman, were now meeting there. For operational management, the Board of Directors of Vorstand was established, headed by Karl Bosch, whose right hand was Hermann Shmitz.

In 1920, the Swiss pharmacological companies Siba, Geigy and Warburg-based Sandoz merged; they soon concluded a cartel agreement with IG Farben. In 1926, IG absorbed two explosives manufacturing plants: Dynamit-Nobel and Rheinisch-Westfälische Sprengstoffwerke. If an attempt to penetrate into the market for explosives in 1925 year met with the threat of a comprehensive war in all foreign markets from DuPont and Hercules Powder Co, now DuPont has entered into a coalition with Dynamit-Nobel.

And to 1929 through the subsidiaries of the megactivo - American “Winthrop Chemical”, English “Imperial Chemical”, and Japanese “Mitsui” - significant stakes in “DuPont” and “Eastman Kodak” were transferred to “IG Farben”. By agreement, the holding proceeded to manufacturing cellophane under the license of DuPont, and DuPont became the owner of half of the shares of the American Bayer Semesan Company and 6% of the ordinary shares of Farben IG.

In 1926, the largest British chemical firms were organized into a single concern, Imperial Chemical Industries. According to the cartel agreement, Farben IG had 75% of the total export quota, in 1927, the concerns controlled 80% of the total world production of dyes, dividing the whole world with the exception of the USSR and the USA. However, in 1932, Imperial Chemical Industries admitted that it could no longer compete and merged with Farben IG.

Together with Imperial Chemical Industries, the monstuos Farben IG has grown into a tentacle 95% of all British chemical products, 100% nitrogen production, 50% dyes, a substantial part of gunpowder and small weapons, through “Imperial Chemical Industries”, the German Frankenstein had connections with “De Beers” and “International Nickel Co. of Canada. " Since 1935, IG has been a consultant to ICI for the construction of the largest chemical plant in the north-east of England.

1929, the company already had 120 000 employees working at 106 various enterprises and factories producing 100% German paints, 85% nitrogen, 90% mineral acids, 41% pharmaceuticals, a third of synthetic fibers and almost all explosives.

The change of anger to mercy by the American partners was marked by a revision of reparation payments to Germany, which implied the withdrawal of the occupying troops from the Rhineland and the elimination of foreign control bodies. The text of the agreement, both new and the previous one, was drawn up by Sullivan & Cromwell. Since the plan was proposed by Owen D. Young, director of the American subsidiary of AEG and General Electric, the name of the Young Plan was assigned to it, although the committee that developed the plan included J.P. Morgan, Herbert Hoover, John Foster Dulles Averell Harriman, and Hjalmar Schacht on the German side.

The plan was adopted at the Hague 1929 — 1930 reparations conference. Part of the plan was the creation of the Bank of International Settlements (Bank of International Settlements). In 1929, a number of events took place: Max Warburg joined the IG Farben board, this place will remain until the 1938 of the year. In addition, Robert Williams’s article published in the Williams Intelligence Summary in February 1950 of the year: General Ludendorff’s widow recalled how her husband withdrew from Hitler, because at the beginning of the summer of 1929, James Warburg, as part of establishing control over Germany, sought to find a suitable person in Germany and came into contact with Adolf Hitler.

According to researchers S. Dunstan and D. Williams, it was on the account of the “Union Bank of Switzerland” (UBS) in Bern that A. Hitler's personal account was opened, as well as another in Holland.

The idea of ​​a bank of international settlements is eloquently described by Bill Clinton’s mentor, Carroll Quigley, in his book Tragedy and Hope: The World история most recent time ":" The forces of finance capital pursued another far-reaching goal - the creation of no less than a privately owned global financial control system that has power both over the political systems of all countries and over the world economy as a whole. "

The Bank for International Settlements was a closed club, whose directors were a member of the Financial Committee of the League of Nations (Financial Committee of the League of Nations), Treasury Controller and Director of the Bank of England Sir Otto Niemeyer and Bank of England Governor Sir Montagu Norman and on the German side, German Economy Minister Jalmar Schacht, the future president of Reichsbank Walter Funk (Dr. Walther Funk), his deputy Emil Paul (Emil Puhl), who had “solid connections in the US”, in particular, “Chase National Bank”, chairman of the board of the IG Farben concern Herman Schmitz, the future SS general Ernst Kaltenbrunner (Ernst Kaltenbrunner), head of the JH Stein bank in Cologne Kurt von Schroeder (Schroeder). According to the new provision, the Commission of the Bank for International Settlements determined the displacement of the head of the central bank of the German Empire.

It is noteworthy that the retired bankers from the banks of the Federal Reserve System became the first chairmen of the bank: Gates W. McGarrah from the Rockefeller's Chase National Bank and Leon Fraser. The latter, having no economic or financial education, being just a journalist who violently denounced corruption, managed in 1924 to become Consul General of reparation payments under the “Dawes Plan”, then Director of “General Electric” and “United States Steel”, then President of “First National Bank, a fast-moving career in the spring of 1945, finished with a shot to the head.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru/v-rossii/2017/01/06/792572-proekt-raschleneniya-rossii-i-zakulisnaya-vlast
39 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. parusnik
    parusnik 15 January 2017 15: 41
    +10
    In principle, it’s interesting ... but somehow the title of the article does not correspond to the content ...
    1. captain
      captain 15 January 2017 16: 06
      +19
      Quote from the author: "... But the American delegation brought to the Paris conference, which summed up the First World War (held intermittently from January 18, 1919 to January 21, 1920), a map with the new borders of the Russian state, where the Central Russian Upland was left behind Moscow, were cut off Baltics, Belarus, Ukraine, Caucasus, Central Asia, Siberia.
      These are the guys from the USA who worked in our country !!! Almost everything was done, except for Siberia. This is the ability to achieve the goal. Directly according to the protocols of the Sions of the sages. Comrade Trotsky completed all the tasks assigned to him. Truth helped dear Ilyich, with his national policy. Think about it, citizens, in 1920 they brought a map with our new borders, and in 1991 we have them !!!
      1. Cat
        Cat 15 January 2017 16: 32
        +4
        Sour! It is necessary to draw conclusions gentlemen!
        1. Donhapa
          Donhapa 15 January 2017 22: 07
          +2
          Quote: Kotischa
          Sour! It is necessary to draw conclusions gentlemen!

          World conspiracy of money-lenders and moneybags of the anti-Russian people in action
      2. parusnik
        parusnik 15 January 2017 16: 41
        +10
        captain
        Think about it, citizens, in 1920 brought a map with our new borders, and in 1991 we have them !!
        !
        ... But until 1991, these borders did not have ... and there was a buffer on the western borders from still friendly states .. And now, after 1991, the troops of the "peace-loving" NATO on the borders of the Russian Federation ..
      3. Schultz
        Schultz 15 January 2017 17: 04
        +12
        The map of the country today corresponds almost completely to the section of the USSR on counts of the indictment of comrade Vyshinsky A.Ya. presented to the Trotskyist gang in the processes of 36-38. and the plan of the collapse of the state of Herzl - Bronstein, implemented by the Yeltsin Ziono-Trotskyists in the 90s.
      4. Donhapa
        Donhapa 15 January 2017 17: 14
        +4
        Quote: captain
        Quote from the author: "... But the American delegation brought to the Paris conference, which summed up the First World War (held intermittently from January 18, 1919 to January 21, 1920), a map with the new borders of the Russian state, where the Central Russian Upland was left behind Moscow, were cut off Baltics, Belarus, Ukraine, Caucasus, Central Asia, Siberia.
        These are the guys from the USA who worked in our country !!! Almost everything was done, except for Siberia. This is the ability to achieve the goal. Directly according to the protocols of the Sions of the sages. Comrade Trotsky completed all the tasks assigned to him. Truth helped dear Ilyich, with his national policy. Think about it, citizens, in 1920 they brought a map with our new borders, and in 1991 we have them !!!


        Moneylenders rule. They have a modest desire to seize our lands and make slaves.
        It would be necessary to break off the filthy little hands and long horns
      5. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 15 January 2017 17: 40
        +6
        "Comrade Trotsky has completed all the tasks assigned to him." ///

        That's for sure. Trotsky organized the Red Army and defeated the White Guards.
        But ... the Moor has done his job - the Moor may leave.

        The coming of the Bolsheviks to power is Lenin.
        The fact that the Bolsheviks remained in power by defeating the Civil War is Trotsky.

        Depending on political sympathies, the Communists should pray for him, and
        monarchists - curse.
        To me personally, as an anti-communist, it is unpleasant negative .
        1. antivirus
          antivirus 15 January 2017 18: 00
          0
          except Trotsky and others were, on the other hand from Lenin, the opposite of Trotsky
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 15 January 2017 18: 10
            +2
            The rest were there - relatively, a trifle. Among them are both villains and normal,
            smarter, dumber, schemers, idealists ...
            But there are only two leaders on a large scale: Lenin and Trotsky.
            Both fanatics and adventurers, but - talented, can not be taken away.
            1. antivirus
              antivirus 15 January 2017 18: 13
              0
              maybe not all geniuses "from the other side" and, accordingly, not all "from our" side are fools? did not want to light up ahead of time?
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 15 January 2017 18: 30
                +4
                By itself. After revolutions, upheavals, civil wars
                as a rule, "gray cardinals" come to power.
                They skillfully intrigue and push out (or kill) revolutionary leaders.
                Lenin was lucky in a sense - he died himself. And so it remained a symbol and a banner of communism. (Otherwise, I would have gotten hit on the top of my head with an ice pick and become a "traitor").
            2. Donhapa
              Donhapa 15 January 2017 22: 14
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              The rest were there - relatively, a trifle. Among them are both villains and normal,
              smarter, dumber, schemers, idealists ...
              But there are only two leaders on a large scale: Lenin and Trotsky.
              Both fanatics and adventurers, but - talented, can not be taken away.

              Whatever talented, as a rule, a scoundrel, and yours in a cube (3rd degree)
        2. kit_bellew
          kit_bellew 15 January 2017 20: 32
          +8
          Quote: voyaka uh
          That's for sure. Trotsky organized the Red Army and defeated the White Guards.

          Trotsky? Arranged? Completeness! Trotsky was Cicero, but not Caesar and not even Pompey. Zvizdabol he was. Decrees - yes, he published as a people's commissar for military affairs and (subsequently) the chairman of the Republican Military Council. But from the issuance of decrees to the creation and organization of the army much further than from the great to the ridiculous.
          In general, the main task of the Leiba of our Bronstein was to ensure that the money allocated to the Russian revolution by its overseas masters would be spent as planned, that is, to incite the world revolution and to throw the Russian people into its furnace. World revolution is controlled chaos. The conductors of today's controlled chaos, I hope, do not need to be specifically called by anyone. One hundred years ago, these were the same people. Structurally. And in a relative way - the direct ancestors of the present.
          But tearing everything that is possible from Russia is now not the most difficult task. Drunkenness, drug addiction, early sex life, teenage suicide and other democratic values ​​against the background of the destruction of the educational system will certainly bear fruit. Maybe we will not see these fruits. Or maybe we'll see. Here are some who write: Trotsky, they say, created the Red Army. This is either ignorance or stuffing.
          1. antivirus
            antivirus 15 January 2017 21: 13
            0
            always everyone looked and now they look as if to tear from whom
            The USA is no exception. Israel - classic, Syria, Libya, KSA, Korea - 2 pcs, Sudan Argentina, Venezuela, not always territories
            GL - from a weak link, the costs of "rocking the boat" and feeding are incommensurable (for a personal pocket) Did the US really spend $ 2 trillion on Iraq?
          2. Donhapa
            Donhapa 15 January 2017 22: 32
            0
            Quote: kit_bellew
            Quote: voyaka uh
            That's for sure. Trotsky organized the Red Army and defeated the White Guards.

            ...: Trotsky, they say, created the Red Army. This is either ignorance or stuffing.


            This is not illiteracy. This is a blatant sio @ nist hutspa!
          3. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 16 January 2017 00: 05
            +2
            "Here are some who write: Trotsky, they say, created the Red Army. This is either illiteracy, or stuffing" ////

            This is an unpleasant truth to you. Trotsky is the organizer of the Red Army, and the organizer of the Reds' victory in the Civil War. If you are for the Bolsheviks, then you should consider him a genius, like Lenin. And if against - consider him a bloody killer.
            Both are true.
          4. Rastas
            Rastas 16 January 2017 20: 56
            +3
            A lie repeated a thousand times becomes true. It has already been proved that neither Lenin nor Trotsky spoke of "burning the Russian people in the furnace of the world revolution." there is their collected works, there is no such quotation. The same Trotsky in his 3-volume work "History of the Russian Revolution" explains why a world revolution was needed, since Russia, weaker economically in comparison with the capitalist countries, would not have withstood the struggle from hostile capitals. countries to a socialist state. Cap. countries would destroy Russia either through direct aggression or through propaganda influence on the elite, which was realized in the end. And you manifest illiteracy. Are the Americans foolish enough to finance the socialist revolution in the largest country in the world? Were they hidden communists there? They would quite calmly deal with the tsarist government, which calmly attracted foreign capital.
        3. Donhapa
          Donhapa 15 January 2017 22: 12
          +1
          Quote: voyaka uh
          "Comrade Trotsky has completed all the tasks assigned to him." ///

          That's for sure. Trotsky organized the Red Army and defeated the White Guards.
          But ... the Moor has done his job - the Moor may leave.

          The coming of the Bolsheviks to power is Lenin.
          The fact that the Bolsheviks remained in power by defeating the Civil War is Trotsky.

          Depending on political sympathies, the Communists should pray for him, and
          monarchists - curse.
          To me personally, as an anti-communist, it is unpleasant negative .

          Your Trotsky with his companions arrived from overseas, finished by o @ nok and rascal @ yay, let there be pr o @ damn you his descendants to the seventh generation
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 16 January 2017 00: 08
            0
            In what I said! The true reaction of the monarchist to Trotsky. good
        4. Baloo
          Baloo 16 January 2017 13: 39
          +2
          Where did Atalef go?
          What I like about our Israeli friends is the ability to bring a fresh stream.
          Trotsky organized the Red Army and defeated the White Guards.
          The regular Red Army was created by Tsarist General Kamenev, and Trotsky was an ordinary balabol, moreover, an agent of influence from the Naglosak financial group.
          Kerensky told his grandson about the February Revolution: 12 people gathered and called Trotsky in America, and the February Revolution took place.
          In one of Mlechin’s films, there is a curious photo: the ambassador of the arrogant Saxons in Russia, Trotsky (both in tailcoats) and the half-sided tsar general in full dress (the general and ambassador are ambassadors relatives). Legend has it that when the Russian army began to crush the enemy on all fronts in 1916, the nuggle-saxon ambassador visited the tsar: Nikolai, let’s renounce that, Russia wants democracy. Sister sheltered, you will live on everything goth ovom.
          Tsar: no, I'm the master of the Russian land. And it happened, the tsar denied, asks his sister: here they trampled me from the house, sheltered .. Queen of the Nagliya: Nope, the oats are cramped and expensive today.
          The fact that the Bolsheviks remained in power by defeating the Civil War is Trotsky.
          That's even nothing to argue about. There is more Trotsky blood on the executioner of Russia than on Stalin. Tryndet for the revolution was a master, moving in the royal carriage with mamzels, champagne ... Such people can only destroy, but not organize. I read his memoirs, patience was enough only until the middle. here is a typical representative of his nation.
          It is surprising that the author ignored the FSA with sufficient attention, for example, such a figure as Lenin Baruch, a year-old. Bernard Baruch was the first to see, in close interaction between capital and the authorities, a way to concentrate in his hands the levers of managing global processes. Since 1912, Baruch has been playing the political map by financing the election campaign of Woodrow Wilson. During the First World War, Baruch became the head of the US Military-Industrial Committee and spins the flywheel of arms buildup. It was Baruch who, as an adviser to the president, persuaded Wilson to support the idea of ​​creating the Fed, and since 1913 the US government has delegated the manufacture of the dollar to a commercial structure - the Federal Reserve. Anticipating the development of the situation in the world, Baruch with a joint American and British bankers in the late 20s conducts a creative maneuver. He sells everything, buys bonds of the FSA government.
          He is seeking a reorientation of American savings on the defense industry through its artificial collapse and immersion in a crisis. It was Baruch and Churchill who became the active organizers of the game to strengthen and then collide the foreheads of Germany and the USSR. By the beginning of the 40s, Baruch was already a billionaire, but the peak of dividends from his business-implicated business fell on the years of World War II and the post-war nuclear arms race. And the story of the exchange of Chinese gold reserves (100 tons) for paper, which remained Chaykanshi, only swallow saliva. But these are other stories. Be that as it may, what distinguishes the actions of the shadow government of world Zionism a hundred years ago from current realities. All the same aspiration for world financial domination. Of the 193 central banks of the world, only 5 are not controlled by the Rothschilds and the like. I understand Stalin’s censorship regarding the Zionists, he was not mistaken. The families of the Baruchs, Loebovs, Schiffs and Kuns, who were related to each other, are conducting all. But that's another story. Why was Kennedy killed? He wanted to take the machine from the Fed, by the way Baruch met with Kennedy. And this is also a different story. Three shots from two points, Oswald also failed, and whether Oswald was holding a rifle in his hands, whether he shot from it. To get a mosaic psychopath from such a distance, unable to train professionally every day for a long time? I beg you, as they say in Odessa: find Aunt Monya at Privoz, buy a goose from her, and rub that goose with your goose. And two dozen witnesses whose testimony did not coincide with the official version somehow strangely died or disappeared within a year. And this is also a different story. I’ll go and listen to Jave Nagil, he’s very excited, he’s uplifting. Damn, maybe I’m a Jew in my soul, not a Tatar? laughing
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 16 January 2017 14: 05
            +2
            "The devil knows, maybe I'm a Jew at heart, and not a Tatar?" ////

            There is a public organization in Israel (no kidding!): "Tatars for a strong Israel."
            Join drinks
            As for Trotsky, you are absolutely right - there is a lot of blood on him (and I mentioned this).
            As for "balabol" - no.
            There is an absolutely wonderful phrase of the anti-Semite Purishkevich
            (he fought with Denikin) approximately: "if we had lured only Trotsky to our side, then in two weeks we would have been in Moscow." And further curses against the incompetent Denikin headquarters ...
            There is also evidence: Trotsky speaks to a regiment of soldiers - agitating to fight for the Soviets. a passer-by shouts: "Why are you listening to him - he's a Jew." Soldiers: "You yourself are a Jew, he is ours, here Lenin is a Jew, and this one is talking about it." In a week, he contrived to form divisions from people who had previously been hostile to the Bolsheviks, reagreeing them. Fantastic speaker. It's another matter whether he deceived them, luring illiterate people with a communist utopia .. sad ? But these are claims to Lenin.
            By the way, Trotsky was hostile towards Jews (Jews). He was asked for the preservation of synagogues, to help release the arrested Jew, etc. - always a sharp refusal.
      6. Odysseus
        Odysseus 15 January 2017 18: 58
        +7
        Quote: captain
        Almost everything was done, except for Siberia. This is the ability to achieve the goal.

        This is a map of the dismemberment of Russia after the liquidation of Soviet power. I recall the elementary facts, in 1920 the war of Soviet Russia against the White Guards and foreign intervention, including the United States (which were in the Far East at the beginning of 1920), continued. The United States did not recognize Soviet Russia; moreover, they did not recognize the USSR until 1933.
        The American imperialists have always been and still are absolute enemies, full antagonists for the communists.
        Quote: captain
        Comrade Trotsky completed all the tasks assigned to him.

        Citizen Trotsky since 1928 in Alma-Ata, since 1929 he was expelled from the USSR, In 1940 he was killed by agents of the NKVD. What tasks did he complete?
        Quote: captain
        Truth helped dear Ilyich, with his national policy.

        The policy of the Russian Communist Party of Bolsheviks (including the national one) made it possible to win the civil war. To expel the invaders and create the USSR, which subsequently became the absolute peak of the power of historical Russia for all time. But just the rejection of socialism (the process of perestroika) led to the liquidation of the USSR and the transformation of Russia into a non-staffed capitalist country that is still alive only with Soviet reserves (nuclear weapons, oil, gas, a place in the Security Council, etc.)
        Quote: captain
        Think about it, citizens, in 1920 brought a map with our new borders, and in 1991 we have them !!!

        Ponder citizen
        1) We do not have these boundaries
        2) The Americans did not bring this card to us, but to Paris. This card has nothing to do with Soviet Russia.
        3) The borders of Soviet Russia and then the USSR have changed since then 20 times.
        4) Where is 1920, and where is 1991? You do not notice the difference in 71 years?
        Quote: captain
        These are the guys from the USA who worked in our country !!!

        The guys from the USA have been working in our country since 1991. And judging by your comments, you very actively support their work.
        1. veteran66
          veteran66 17 January 2017 21: 26
          0
          Quote: Odyssey
          Transformations of Russia into a non-staffed cap.country still live only with Soviet reserves (nuclear weapons, oil, gas, a place in the Security Council, etc.)

          about oil and gas is something)))) This, like, did the Bolsheviks accumulate gas and oil? There Ukrainians dug up the sea and are proud, and the Bolsheviks then, you see, cooler!
          1. Odysseus
            Odysseus 18 January 2017 02: 05
            +4
            The irony is good when a person knows at least something and at the same time has a sense of humor. Otherwise, it causes pity.
            No, citizen, the Bolsheviks did not "accumulate" oil. Under their leadership and within the framework of the planned economy, exploration of deposits was carried out, these deposits were developed and pipelines were laid.
            Moreover, this was done for the common good, and not for the profits of the Abramovichs, Vekselbergs and Alekperovs.
            And what would happen to Russia without oil is clearly visible on the example of post-Soviet republics also conducting market reforms but not having oil. For example, the one you mentioned in Ukraine.
            1. veteran66
              veteran66 18 January 2017 08: 00
              0
              Quote: Odyssey
              Under their leadership and within the framework of the planned economy, exploration of deposits was carried out, these deposits were developed and pipelines were developed.

              these deposits have been exhausted for a long time, since the 91st year new ones were discovered and mastered, pipelines to them were laid, old ones built in the USSR have already been updated, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AD%D0%BA% D0% BE%
              D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%A1%D0%A1%
              D0%A1%D0%A0#.D0.9D.D0.B5.D1.84.D1.82.D0.B5.D0.B3.
              D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.BE.D0.B2.D1.8B.D0.B9_.D1.81.D0.B5.
              D0.BA.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80
              in the 80s, only a fifth of the discovered deposits in the 50s, and in the 70s generally zero. Do you think the equipment working around the clock for wear can last more than fifty years? This in Ukraine is still using the old legacy.
              1. Odysseus
                Odysseus 19 January 2017 08: 43
                +4
                Quote: veteran66
                these deposits have been exhausted for a long time, since the 91st year new and discovered

                You have provided a link to a common article in support of your theses Wikipedia about the Soviet economy.
                Moreover, they didn’t even read what they brought in. Moreover, excuse me, but you don’t understand what you are writing about — exploration and field development is oil production, but you brought figures about oil refining . Oil production is oil fields, oil refining is oil refineries.
                Moreover, in the same article, two graphs are given that just characterize the renewal of fixed assets in oil production.
                https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AD%D0%BA%D0%BE%
                D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%A1%D0%A1%
                D0%A1%D0%A0#/media/File:%D0%93%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B1%
                D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D
                0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%91%D1
                %83%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%
                9D%D0%B5%D1%84%D1%82%D1%8C%D0%98%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B
                7%D0%92%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B8.png
                In addition, even in your interpretation of the oil refining figures, you "forgot" to point out that the commissioning of new capacities in the two decades of 90-2000 was near zero.
                Even according to these graphs, the fact is obvious that even in a region that does not have problems with investments and is extremely important for oligarchs, oil production and oil refining, the capitalist RF simply parasitizes on Soviet funds.
                Quote: veteran66
                This in Ukraine is still using the old legacy.

                The Ukrainian SSR is no different from the RSFSR. And that and that republic is part of the USSR, and there and there were the same processes of "restructuring" and there and there they began to carry out the same "market reforms", and here and there they came to the same results - the destruction of the economy, rapid extinction people and the formation of countries of oligarchs and homeless people. In general, everything is absolutely the same. The only difference is that the RSFSR is larger in territory and it got more Soviet reserves (oil, nuclear weapons, etc.)
                Therefore, Ukraine has generally ceased to exist as an independent country, and Russia is still trying to flutter somehow. But if "democratic reforms" continue, the end of Russia will be completely analogous to the end of Ukraine.
                1. veteran66
                  veteran66 19 January 2017 09: 50
                  0
                  Quote: Odyssey
                  Even according to these graphs, the fact is obvious that even in a region that does not have problems with investments and is extremely important for oligarchs, oil production and oil refining, the capitalist RF simply parasitizes on Soviet funds.

                  Yes, I agree that I somewhat confused oil refining with hydrocarbon production.
                  In addition, even in your interpretation of the oil refining figures, you "forgot" to point out that the commissioning of new capacities in the two decades of 90-2000 was near zero.
                  I have not "forgotten", it just makes no sense to introduce new ones, since there is an opportunity to modernize (in fact, rebuild again) the old ones. So you are wrong about parasitism. First, not all of the 37 refineries operating in Russia came from the USSR, two were built, for example, Novoshakhtinsky and Mariysky. Secondly, all the old ones have been modernized, only squares and some buildings are left there, even new fences, not to mention the equipment. I know firsthand, because my brother took part in the launch of two modernized ones.
                  Quote: Odyssey
                  USSR is no different from the RSFSR

                  differs, more precisely, Ukraine from the Russian Federation, if modernization and construction of oil refineries were carried out in the Russian Federation at the very least, Ukraine is parasitic on old stocks, an assessment of their transport system (pipelines) has become a byword.
                  Now about exploration and development.
                  Yety-Purovskoye oil deposit. Opened in 1982, development began only in 2003. Oil reserves are about 40 million tons. Verkh-Tarskoe oil deposit. The field was discovered in 1970, development began in 2000. Vankor field. Opened in 1991. Development began in 2009. Tuimazinskoe oil deposit. The field was discovered back in 1937. Field development began in 1944. Thanks to the latest method, the bulk of recoverable reserves were mined over 20 years. Two times more oil was selected from the Devonian beds than would have been possible to extract using conventional methods. However, the reserves are so large that production continues to this day.
                  Well, to the heap about gas:
                  Angaro-Lenskoye gas field. The field was discovered at the beginning of the XXI century. Nakhodkinskoe gas field. Although the field was discovered a long time ago (in 1974), its development began only in 2004.

                  Source: https://geographyofrussia.com/neft-i-gaz/
                  This is only from the largest deposits. There are still open and developed under the USSR, but equipment was modernized there long ago, so talking about parasitization on old stocks is somehow incorrect.
            2. veteran66
              veteran66 18 January 2017 08: 03
              0
              Quote: Odyssey
              And this was done for the common good

              and what was the benefit for the peoples of the USSR? Did we live like sheikhs in the emirates? No, the USSR fed and supported all the natives who declared their "socialist orientation", and the Communist Party around the world, as well as various terrorist organizations
              1. Odysseus
                Odysseus 19 January 2017 09: 35
                +3
                Quote: veteran66
                and what was the use for the peoples of the USSR?

                How what? Such that everything mined and produced was used for all citizens of the USSR (from space and science to tanks and free apartments), but was not brought to the West and was not used to buy Chelsea football club and apartments in Miami.
                Quote: veteran66
                Did we live like sheikhs in the emirates?

                “There’s an elder in the garden, but there’s an uncle in Kiev.” How do sheikhs relate to the elementary fact that in the USSR there was public ownership of the means of production?
                And then, does everyone in the UAE (especially in the 80s) live like sheikhs? Does the population of the USSR and the UAE coincide? Are there really any criteria of similarity between the USSR and the UAE? And by the way, the oil industry in the UAE is nationalized.
                Quote: veteran66
                No, the USSR fed and supported all the natives who declared their "socialist orientation", and the Communist Party around the world, as well as various terrorist organizations

                Again, "There is an elder in the garden, and there is an uncle in Kiev." What does the foreign policy of the USSR have to do with it? And then if you really want to talk about foreign policy, then the USSR was the leader of the Socialist world, the leader of all people striving to live without the exploitation of man by man, without poverty, crime, unemployment, and so on.
                Call it - "feeding the natives" can only be a person, shall we say, of very specific moral qualities ...
                But even without speaking about your morality, in terms of "geopolitical" criteria, the USSR was a world power, for the first time in the history of Russia we had allies and could influence the whole world, our tanks were stationed on the Elbe and on the Caribbean coast, we created markets for ourselves from Vietnam to Nicaragua.
                But abandoning socialism, we found ourselves in a sad and miserable present, with a border near Smolensk and endless civil wars and conflicts throughout the former USSR.
                PS I briefly looked at your messages. First, forgive the truth, I thought that you are a standard beggar "TV-Russian" heroically and for free fighting for the interests of oligarchic capitalism against bad "commies" until I came across a message where you justify the Israeli occupiers and murderers Palestinian boy. They killed him because he threw a stone towards the occupiers. Foolishness can be justified, you can even enlighten a person, but meanness never. them.
                So I don’t think that the dialogue between us can make any sense.
  2. cap
    cap 15 January 2017 16: 12
    +8
    "The forces of financial capital pursued another far-reaching goal - the creation of no less privately owned global system of financial control, with power over both the political systems of all countries and the global economy as a whole."


    It has been functioning successfully for a long time.
  3. cyberspace
    cyberspace 15 January 2017 17: 03
    +6
    He ended his swift career in the spring of 1945 with a shot at the temple.

    Some perestroika and privatization figures should start their careers with this.
  4. Flinky
    Flinky 15 January 2017 19: 24
    +2
    Pique vests lifted shoulders. They did not deny that Chamberlain was also a head. But most of all, Briand consoled them.
    - Briand! they said with fervor. - This is the head! He with his pan-Europe project ...
    1. Schultz
      Schultz 15 January 2017 19: 55
      +3
      The project of pan-Europe - as the second center of world domination before common unity was proposed by Herzl at the 2st Zion Congress, and continued by Bronstein in his "idea" of the United States of Europe (please do not confuse with Lenin's definition of the USE), sealed by the world revolution (for account of Russian blood as a sacrifice to Baal)
      1. Flinky
        Flinky 16 January 2017 09: 12
        +1
        Yes, no difference. As history has shown, pique vests do not end there.
  5. Dekabrist
    Dekabrist 15 January 2017 21: 26
    +1
    If someone is interested in the questions posed in the title of the article.
    Book: Information War and Geopolitics
    Author: Igor Nikolaevich Panarin (born 30 on October 1958) is a Russian political scientist, candidate of psychological sciences, doctor of political sciences, full member of the Academy of Military Sciences. Member of the Scientific and Methodological Council at the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation, member of the Expert Council of the CIS Affairs Committee of the Federation Council.
    Link: http: //www.e-reading.club/book.php? Book = 12
    3890
    If you approach critically, not taking everything on faith, you can gather a lot of interesting information.
  6. Captain Pushkin
    Captain Pushkin 17 January 2017 11: 42
    +4
    Quote: voyaka uh

    2
    voyaka uh January 15, 2017 18:10 ↑
    The rest were there - relatively, a trifle. Among them are both villains and normal,
    smarter, dumber, schemers, idealists ...
    But there are only two leaders on a large scale: Lenin and Trotsky.

    They did not take into account Yasha Sverdlov, in fact, he unleashed a civil war with his bloody repressions.
    The strings lead him to the murder of Nicholas II and the attempt on Lenin ...
    At the time of his untimely death, young and distinguished by his excellent health, Yakov Sverdlov wiped out Lenin and Trotsky in the second roles and was in one person the supreme party, executive and legislative power.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 17 January 2017 15: 39
      +2
      Attributed. This applies clearly to villains and schemers.
      But not to the leaders-organizers of the Bolshevik government.
  7. Captain Pushkin
    Captain Pushkin 17 January 2017 11: 56
    +3
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Lenin was lucky in a sense - he died himself. And so it remained a symbol and a banner of communism. (Otherwise, I would have gotten hit on the top of my head with an ice pick and become a "traitor").

    It is unlikely. Ilyich was a guy not a miss. It is very likely that Sverdlov retired by his labors (or Trotsky's cares, which is also likely).
    Trotsky’s famous phrase is that a civil war should last as long as possible.
    And Lenin’s statement that a civil war could have been avoided. This meant either a recognition of Lenin's responsibility for its occurrence, or preparation for a decisive battle with Trotsky.
    Someone believes that Lenin was so weak on his head that he would take responsibility for the civil war?
    There remains only the untimely death of one of the rivals, it is likely that Trotsky, from some unknown disease.