Jiangdao Class Corvette Launched in Shanghai for China's Navy

54
Edition Jane's defense weekly reports that a serial corvette of the Jiangdao class has been launched in Shanghai, China. The warship was created at the Hudong-Zhonghua facility for the Chinese naval forces. In the three years since the launch of the lead ship of this series (the 056 project), the 30 corvettes have already been built. It is known that the construction of corvettes for the Chinese Navy is carried out not only at the Shanghai shipyard, but also in the cities of Guangzhou, Dalian and Wuhan.

At the same time, there is no information on how many Jiangdao-class warships are ordered from manufacturers by the command of the PRC Navy. There are only messages in the American media that allegedly refer to US intelligence. According to this data, China plans to replenish its naval forces with the 3-th corvette of this project in the coming 30 of the year.



Jiangdao Class Corvette Launched in Shanghai for China's Navy


Corsets 056 "Jiangdao" in China have the status of stealth ships with missile weapons. This armament is represented by the 2x2 YJ-83 1 x 8 PU ZUR FL3000N. In addition, the 056 corvettes of the project are armed with anti-aircraft systems, radar and mine-torpedo systems. Corvetry artillery is represented by 1 × 76 mm AU H / PJ-26.

The Jiangdao corvettes have the following dimensions: length - about 89 m, width - 11,6 m, draft - 4 m. The crew of the ship is 60 h. Cruising range - 3500 nautical miles. Maximum travel speed - 28 knots.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    54 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      11 January 2017 13: 19
      They have the pace and the number of us to start! Now, if the Chinese also destroyers also begin to mass stamp, this will be a confirmation of China's desire to dominate the region.
      1. +14
        11 January 2017 13: 24
        yeah .. the pace with us, compared with them - sadness, sadness ..
        As Stalin said in a historical anecdote: "What will we do, what will we do? We will envy!"
        1. +8
          11 January 2017 13: 28
          The Jiangdao corvettes have the following dimensions: length - about 89 m, width - 11,6 m, draft - 4 m. The crew of the ship is 60 h. Cruising range - 3500 nautical miles. Maximum travel speed - 28 knots.


          With such performance characteristics, only quantity can improve quality, but the pace is impressive.
          1. +2
            11 January 2017 13: 42
            In terms of performance characteristics, Chinese corvettes are inferior to ours in terms of navigation range, the crew is smaller, and there are no data on armament (Chinese) ..
            Quote: cniza
            The Jiangdao corvettes have the following dimensions: length - about 89 m, width - 11,6 m, draft - 4 m. The crew of the ship is 60 h. Cruising range - 3500 nautical miles. Maximum travel speed - 28 knots.


            With such performance characteristics, only quantity can improve quality, but the pace is impressive.
            1. +3
              11 January 2017 14: 09
              are given data on missile weapons, or what grabs you, artillery?
          2. +1
            11 January 2017 13: 47
            as far as I understand, our project 20380 is about the same in size, only a crew of 99 people. But what is the difference in stuffing and armament - this is the question.
            1. +11
              11 January 2017 14: 11
              in terms of missile armament and radar, 20380 is better, not to mention 20385, but the Chinese will have 2021 of them by 60, so it's silly to compare. Compared to them, we are engaged in "manual assembly" and they are "conveyor"
              1. +4
                11 January 2017 14: 17
                yeah. And we have the first corvette at the Pacific Fleet now only the tests pass ...
                1. +3
                  11 January 2017 15: 59
                  This is not to count the fact that they already have seventeen destroyers and two more aircraft carriers are being built, and we are at their side, with all our resources. Looks like such a thought at the top does not visit anyone. As they say: - "While we are friends with China, and after us there is a hot flood."
                  1. +6
                    11 January 2017 19: 31
                    Quote: vanek77
                    This does not take into account that they already have seventeen destroyers and two more aircraft carriers being built, but we are at their side, with all our resources

                    Eeee, and what threatens us with the Chinese fleet? Now, if they began to make tanks at the pace as in the USSR (and they can), then there would be cause for concern.
                    1. +1
                      13 January 2017 07: 43
                      Well, if you look from a different angle - China has a powerful economy, they will build ships in ANY case faster than us, this will inevitably lead to the loss of regular customers ordering ships from us (except for India, everything is clear here) Then when we 9 years building 1 corvette
        2. +11
          11 January 2017 13: 41
          Quote: Mikado
          yeah .. the pace with us, compared with them - sadness, sadness ..

          They have the world's first economy and are critically dependent on trade in the sea. For them, the fleet is very important. Plus the benefits of socialism. Hence the pace.
          1. +10
            11 January 2017 14: 00
            Plus the benefits of socialism.

            neither add nor subtract. There are definitely certain features. Plus high organization. Yes, a lot of "plus what". There are only fewer embezzlers, I suspect.
          2. +9
            11 January 2017 14: 07
            Plus the benefits of socialism
            and this is most important - a planned economy of a mixed type, but with an emphasis on the plan.
        3. +3
          11 January 2017 14: 18
          Quote: Mikado
          the pace we have, compared with them - sadness, sadness ..

          China's GDP is 20 trillion, and the Russian Federation is 3,7. Why be surprised? request
      2. +5
        11 January 2017 13: 25
        Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
        They have the pace and the number of us to start! Now, if the Chinese also destroyers also begin to mass stamp, this will be a confirmation of China's desire to dominate the region.


        I read it here somehow. It can be seen that a knowledgeable person spoke out. In general, the bottom line is that the ships in China look cool, modern, and when you start to understand inside, then the output of the technology of the 60s - 70s. Of course, they are studying, but China is still far from the status of a great sea power.
        1. 0
          11 January 2017 13: 43
          As for technology .... almost all new ship projects were developed by the Russians (Nevsky Design Bureau), or directly participated. Thus, we have the same thing, 60-70 years.
        2. +1
          11 January 2017 13: 44
          And here it is. Soon they will become a sea power. They learn as fast as they produce products ..
          Quote: Orel
          Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
          They have the pace and the number of us to start! Now, if the Chinese also destroyers also begin to mass stamp, this will be a confirmation of China's desire to dominate the region.


          I read it here somehow. It can be seen that a knowledgeable person spoke out. In general, the bottom line is that the ships in China look cool, modern, and when you start to understand inside, then the output of the technology of the 60s - 70s. Of course, they are studying, but China is still far from the status of a great sea power.
          1. 0
            11 January 2017 13: 57
            Quote: 210ox
            And here it is. Soon they will become a sea power. They learn as fast as they produce products ..


            It is possible that they will. Sooner or later, the return on such efforts is inevitable. The question is time, though China has a very serious problem that prevents them - the lack of combat experience and practical use of the fleet. Even on a historical scale. And this is very bad, because if you take the same USA, then a lot of things in the ships are redone after the Malomsky conflict, and after all, all the ships are made by serious engineers, like they are calculating everything, but it wasn’t there. China has no experience at all. Even the experience of World War II. They did not have the same technology. They could steal, they got something old from us - they actually got it, but I think the theory of application and the doctrine are very, very behind them.
      3. +1
        11 January 2017 13: 25
        Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
        Now, if the Chinese also destroyers also begin to mass stamp, this will be a confirmation of China's desire to dominate the region.

        So they destroy and stamp massively. Now in completion-7 destroyers 052D.
        1. +3
          11 January 2017 13: 28
          . About three corvettes have already been built in the three years since the launch of the lead ship of this series (project 056).
          continue to shout cheers, and laugh at China-Xerox ... yesterday I wrote:
          just for reference, I won’t even comment ... Type 054A (codename NATO Jiangkai II) is a frigate class of Chinese multi-purpose frigates, the first of which entered service with the People's Surface Force of the Liberation Army of the Navy in 2007. It is planned to include 24+ ships in 2016 . As of 22, 1 are in operation, 2 completion and 054 are under construction. This is a development of type XNUMX frigate, using the same hull, but with improved sensors and weapons.
      4. 0
        11 January 2017 13: 46
        Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
        They have the pace and the number of us to start!


        We cannot even release RTOs at such a pace!
        1. 0
          11 January 2017 16: 47
          Quote: Titsen
          We cannot even release RTOs at such a pace!

          Yes, we can not. But RTOs possess shock weapons an order of magnitude more powerful.
          And the horse-racing duel of these ships ... I would not bet on China, even with their three-fold numerical superiority.
          1. 0
            12 January 2017 06: 04
            RTOs are inferior to corvettes in anti-aircraft defense, and even though the complete absence of anti-aircraft defense is slightly offset by the presence of diesel-electric submarines (in the future there are 6 Warsaw women in Pacific Fleet + 877 and now in the Black Sea Fleet + 877), the minimum anti-aircraft defense should be on a warship.
            1. 0
              12 January 2017 20: 28
              Quote: drunkram
              RTOs are inferior to air defense corvettes

              Specifically, Buyan-M is not much inferior to the Chinese type 056.
              And if we compare the ships close in terms of displacement .. then from our side it will be pr.20380 (from 20385 it just makes no sense to compare). So, pr. 20380 has a better strike. Air defense .. it’s just not comparable, the capabilities of the equipment are unknown to me, but both of them have it.
      5. +1
        11 January 2017 22: 28
        Their desire to dominate the region is written in large hieroglyphs on all parts of the body. At this rate, they will soon be able to build a fence of corvettes around Taiwan, solid, without gaps. It is necessary for ours to move, otherwise we will soon request permission to enter Vladivostok in Beijing. In addition, the revitalization of shipbuilding will lead to the revitalization of related industries and the economy as a whole. And that over there in Vladivostok the "Radiopribor" plant (the owner of the plant is hiding in the USA and the director is under investigation for the Coperfield tricks with the disappearance of money) is on fire. They shouted through the media that they had been given a state order for 2017, but it is scanty, and despite the fact that last year the plant successfully completed the state order.
      6. +1
        12 January 2017 00: 14
        Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
        -On to start!

        There is nothing to envy, the boat is primitive, everything in the spirit of Chinese military thought - to fill up the enemy with numbers - worthy followers of the Americans.
    2. +1
      11 January 2017 13: 20
      Already a small fleet, it can be assumed that they will become the basis of the aircraft carrier group.
      1. +1
        11 January 2017 13: 30
        No, it's like our OVR ships. The main group will be 052D destroyers.
      2. 0
        11 January 2017 13: 44
        Quote: Teberii
        Already a small fleet, it can be assumed that they will become the basis of the aircraft carrier group.


        And most importantly, how to bake pies!

        Get ready for Trump!
      3. +6
        11 January 2017 14: 47
        Not. This is just a cheap OVR corvette. It can do a bit in RCC (and with the new two-step, it can even do quite well), a little in the PLO - and version A with a towed antenna = so good, it provides reception and short-term basing of the helicopter. There are short-range air defense systems.

        052D destroyers will form the basis of the AOG - Kunming, Changsha, hefei, Yinchuan have already been accepted into the fleet and currently provide Liaolin actions. Xining has passed state tests and will be adopted the other day (generally, most likely to the Chinese NG).

        Under construction are - 7 destroyers of this project and 2 (in addition to Xining) in trials.


        Each destroyer carries 64 mines for heavy missiles air defense systems, anti-ship missiles, missiles. It has a separate near air defense circuit, advanced detection and control systems.

        At the moment, the Chinese are already joining the headquarters of the 055 super destroyer - it will already have 120 + mines for heavy missiles.

        AUG will also include frigates of the 054А type - of which more than 20 + have already been released and new ones are being built. They have the Shtil-1 air defense missile system as on the royal series of admirals (11356) - only not 32 missiles, and not 24 missiles as on 11356. Plus 8 RCC S802 in the future they will be replaced by new two-stage.
        1. 0
          12 January 2017 00: 25
          Quote: donavi49
          Each destroyer carries 64 mines for heavy missiles air defense systems, anti-ship missiles, missiles.

          64 mines for HEAVY rockets? Yes, you drive.
      4. 0
        12 January 2017 06: 06
        Destroyers will become the foundation + darkness obscuring frigates and support ships, including giant landing ships
    3. +2
      11 January 2017 13: 23
      More specifically, 30 in the ranks, another 11 in the completion. Of these, 23 in the main version, 18 in anti-submarine.
      This ship is the 42nd.
    4. +1
      11 January 2017 13: 29
      Yes, it looks like "Amursky .." we urgently need a crisis manager from China, fortunately, it's not far away. Either the plant will start working or the Chinese will come to a complete despondency and indecency, one of two things.
      1. +7
        11 January 2017 13: 40
        Apparently, a "crisis manager from China" is needed not so much for the Amur shipbuilding as for our government ...
        1. +3
          11 January 2017 13: 43
          Well, you don’t even have to dream about it, but what our government has succeeded in is that not a single pensioner and small entrepreneur will leave them alive.
        2. +2
          11 January 2017 14: 03
          Quote: kepmor
          Apparently, a "crisis manager from China" is needed not so much for the Amur shipbuilding as for our government ...

          We had such a "manager", the CPSU was called ... They refused, apparently did not like it ... request
    5. The comment was deleted.
      1. +2
        11 January 2017 13: 36
        Quote from rudolf
        Some pace is fantastic. Even boats cannot be built with such speed. Maybe it's time to order ships from the Chinese?

        Well, yes ... the rest is (not a weapon) with us, and so is Chinese ...
        1. +1
          11 January 2017 23: 28
          with the union it was not shameful to build ships in the GDR, Poland, Finland ....
          1. 0
            15 January 2017 20: 32
            I believe that non-nuclear destroyers, it was quite possible, could be jointly built for us, in the PRC and the Russian Federation, according to the Chinese project, with our weapons. Together, remember how quickly they made the DCK, and here, about 20, in 6-7 years, it was really with Chinese help. Yours faithfully!
    6. 0
      11 January 2017 13: 35
      About three corvettes have already been built in the three years since the launch of the lead ship of this series (project 056). And we can’t build a much smaller number of corvettes. Everything is being shifted, and the reasons are looking for a way to delay it, but at the same time get the money.
      1. 0
        11 January 2017 14: 07
        Quote: Alexey 2016
        . And we can’t build a much smaller number of corvettes.

        and? Go on with betrayals .. that in the Caspian in 2015 we have 10..not ... 20 Chinese corvettes ..
        What would be the result?
    7. +1
      11 January 2017 13: 44
      About three corvettes have already been built in the three years since the launch of the lead ship of this series (project 056).
      Some kind of horror, not the pace of construction! belay The Communist Party confidently rules its boat.
    8. 0
      11 January 2017 14: 02
      "In the three years since the launch of the lead ship of this series (project 056), about 30 corvettes have already been built."
      As the saying goes - "there are no words ... only letters." Our "shipbuilding captains" are just right to "drown" ... The question arises - gentlemen, why is this?
      1. +2
        11 January 2017 14: 33
        I don’t know what they were so worried about. What is another country (in the West) where 10 corvettes a year are slapped?
        How did the Chinese succeed in sports? because training 7 days a week, for 10-11 hours, 4-5 years in a row. No one in developed countries is ready for this.
        Some of you want to work at the plant for a penny all day, en masse, from morning to evening, just a little - dismissal and poverty, or arrest. I don’t want to live in such a society. For me, there are fewer corvettes.
        And do not forget the number - quality does not mean. During the USSR, 20000 aircraft, 100000 tanks were riveted in a short period, the equipment was of a different quality and capabilities. Now they take not a number, but a skill.
        The theater of war constantly demonstrates that a company of trained special forces is more effective in battle than a battalion of bearded peasants
        1. +6
          11 January 2017 19: 23
          Quote: tatarin_ru
          Some of you want to work at the plant for a penny all day, en masse, from morning to evening, just a little - dismissal and poverty, or arrest. I don’t want to live in such a society. For me, there are fewer corvettes.

          Powerful, I especially liked about the arrest. In reality, the average salary in the PRC in 2015 was about $ 750 (in cities, naturally, higher). And this is at much lower prices and large public consumption funds. And this is in the absence of a gap between the capital and the province. , with a huge population of the poor there are still enough, but on the whole, if you personally create such conditions as in China, you would think that you were in heaven.
          Quote: tatarin_ru
          During the Soviet era, 20000 aircraft, 100000 tanks riveted in a short period, the equipment was of a different quality and capabilities

          Even steeper, given that the vast majority of equipment of the Russian army, this is the technology of the Soviet Union at best modernized. But it only became 30 years older and, accordingly, became worse.
          1. 0
            17 January 2017 22: 51
            In reality, the average salary in China in 2015 was about $ 750 (naturally higher in cities)

            Of course, I understand what you are writing about, the number of rich people in China has grown significantly and there are oligarchs, but do not write about the average of 750 dollars and higher in the country. I really do not like rashly copied propaganda. I will not argue about the prices of food and medicine, they are lower. I'm talking about the poor and the poor, below the line about 170 million. , for each position there is a line of 100 people. You google 10 of the most brutal murders, there is only one reason - the boss promised a promotion, used it for thirty years, and deceived him by the sweat. And about athletes - I voiced above the words of the athletes themselves (2-time Olympic champion, tennis).
            But she became 30 years older and, accordingly, became worse.

            I'm not talking about that, roughly speaking, bows were invented for them, arrows were invented for them, and both of them needed a lot to supply the army, later the Maxim machine gun appeared, and two machine guns at a height were able to stop Chapay on horseback and in ecstasy. A more complex product requires more training, but it solves the problem more efficiently. There are no 20000 planes and will never be in any country.
        2. 0
          15 January 2017 20: 36
          We already work for a penny, a twelve-hour working day, workers do not have social guarantees, only we build ships more slowly, maybe something else?
    9. +5
      11 January 2017 14: 10
      The pace of construction of the fleet in China is impressive, and in the Russian Federation, only fingers are bending about the alleged achievements of the government, which has achieved achievements only in the number of elite real estate outside the borders of the Russian Federation in its `` loved ones ''
    10. 0
      12 January 2017 00: 36
      handsome Chinese, what else can I say ....
    11. +2
      13 January 2017 01: 56
      Quote: Odyssey
      If you personally create such conditions as in China, you would think that you were in paradise.

      And after all, an adult writes this, even a psychiatric examination will pass successfully for sure.

      1. 0
        13 January 2017 02: 17
        More about paradise life:

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"