Cold War Tanks

27
Hundreds arrived in German Bremerhaven tanks and other military equipment from the United States. The cargo will go to Poland, and later relocated to the Baltic republics. There is nothing unexpected in the deployment of heavy equipment in Europe: the White House announced its intention to deploy an armored brigade group in Eastern Europe in April last year. However, German media are already scribbling about the upcoming "war with Russia."





Hundreds of tanks, artillery installations and other equipment from the United States were delivered to Bremerhaven by sea, reports the TV channel "RT". The equipment will go to Poland, then to the Baltic States, where it will strengthen the group of NATO troops on the borders with Russia.

Technique is not everything. In addition to tanks and trucks, four states (USA, Canada, Great Britain and Germany) will send about four thousand soldiers to the Baltic republics.

Lt. Gen. Tim Ray, deputy commander of US forces in Europe, welcomed the arrival of equipment from the United States. He recalled that the tanks will also participate in joint US-Polish exercises. "We will increase the scale of many exercises that we regularly conduct and give them a more complex character, paying attention to the joint organization of interaction, antimissile defense and operations to overcome crisis situations," the channel quoted Rey.

Tim Ray did not hide the purpose of the arrival of tanks and troops.

“Let me be clear: this is part of our efforts to curb aggression from Russia, to ensure the territorial integrity of our allies and to support freedom, prosperity and peace in Europe,” Ray said. RBC.

According to a military official, about seventy thousand US troops stationed in Europe quickly adapt to changes in the strategic situation. Speaking of this, Ray was referring to the “Russian military operations in Ukraine,” as well as the flow of migrants from Syria and the rise of Islamism.

In total, Bremerhaven arrived from the USA approx. 2,8 thousand units of military equipment and about four thousand soldiers, according to "RBC".

The arrival of soldiers and heavy equipment was one of the leading topics for the European press. Many journalists, speculating on the headlines, write about the impending war with Russia. Like, tanks and soldiers for her and intended.

"Bundesdeutsche Zeitung" the title states: "USA entladen Panzer in Deutschland für Krieg gegen Russland". Translation: "The United States unloads tanks in Germany for war against Russia."

The material states that for the transportation of vehicles a total of 900 cars would be required: the length of a conventional train would be 14 kilometers. Trains with vehicles have already begun to run: according to plans, the transportation that began on January 7 should be completed on January 16.

Not all Germans welcome American technology. Protests took place in Bremerhaven. The left in Germany are outraged. According to them, the German federal government is participating in a NATO march against Russia. The Left demands an immediate end to the arms race between NATO and Russia and the transition to the phase of relieving tension and disarmament. “Stop the military deployment” - this is what the German left forces are calling for. The Bundeswehr should abandon the support of anti-Russian NATO ideas, and the federal government should abandon the use of German territory for the deployment of troops and their movement. It's time to go to the policy of detente with Russia!

The publication also reminds that the German left rejects the exercises conducted by the United States on the deployment of forces in the region, oppose rearmament and “sabering weapons"NATO. The left believes that the current escalation of the situation is an obvious "escalation towards Russia." Among the consequences, they see a further arms race between NATO and Russia.

Newspaper Tagesschau.de indicates that the US Army uses the city of Bremerhaven as a logistics hub. Soldiers, vehicles, and heavy vehicles will be transported to Poland: previously, the Eastern European nations of NATO asked for a "higher level of protection."

Delivery of equipment to Europe is part of B. Obama's plan, which is implemented after the “Russian initiative to annex Crimea in 2014,” the newspaper notes. Strengthening the power of equipment and soldiers sent in the name of the execution of the duty to the NATO allies and it is necessary to strengthen their forces. Major General Timothy P. McGuire, commander of US land forces in Europe, said that "this signals a continued US commitment to peace and prosperity on the European continent."

Experts have found that the security situation has completely changed in the last two years, so the deployment of new forces is understandable. Political analyst Klaus Zegbers, who heads the Eastern Europe Institute of Politics at the Free University of Berlin, says: “Within two years, the security situation in Europe has completely changed.” The expert points to the Ukrainian situation, the principle of NATO solidarity and recalls the need to “stabilize” security, for example, in relation to Estonia. He also considers it necessary to give Moscow something to understand in order to change its “perception”.

The haste of unloading machinery may be associated with the early coming to power in the USA by D. Trump, admits T-online.de. After all, Donald Trump has repeatedly made it clear during the election campaign that he does not understand how Americans can spend so much money on “containment” in Europe. Europeans should then take care of payment for services.

In addition, Mr. Trump is seeking to improve relations with the Kremlin, more precisely, with his master, Vladimir Putin. And in this case, American military actions "in the Russian environs" look like "unnecessary provocation."

The newspaper believes that a change of policy in NATO is quite acceptable. At NATO headquarters in Brussels, there is already “some lull,” because all the funds planned for this year have been approved by the US Congress. Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is confident that this year the United States "will adhere to its obligations."

Russian experts are talking about the haste of Obama’s actions.

“Barack Obama began the transfer of the 3 armored brigade to Europe ahead of schedule,” said "Free Press" Leading expert at the Center for Military-Political Studies MGIMO, Doctor of Political Sciences Mikhail Alexandrov. - Initially, I recall, the operation was scheduled for February 2017 year. This is done, of course, in the framework of the decisions of the Warsaw Summit of NATO on the deployment of four battalion tactical groups in Poland and the Baltic States. ”

The expert clarified that the battalion tactical groups have the infrastructure to quickly deploy to full-fledged brigades: personnel can be deployed by air, and equipment will already be waiting in warehouses. “These will be the most combat-ready brigades of the West in Europe, plus they will be supported by the Polish army, which is already quite impressive force, taking into account that aviation It can also be quickly transferred from Germany or even from the USA, ”Alexandrov noted. “As a result, the United States will be able to create a powerful shock fist on the borders of the Kaliningrad region within two weeks.”

“On our side, I recall that there are only three divisions plus the Baltic Fleet. However, NATO may delay our forces fleethaving transferred additional naval groups to the Baltic, where, by the way, there are both the German navy and the Polish. In other words, the West will really be able to quickly create an advantage in the Kaliningrad region. ”


In response, Russia will be able to increase the grouping in the Kaliningrad region. True, there is “a small territory, and there are not many troops on it”. The expert considers the creation of two tank armies “on the borders of Latvia and Lithuania” to be the best option. “In this case, the alliance will have no illusions that it can capture the Kaliningrad region,” he believes.

In the end, we add, Barack Obama did everything to at least one year complicate relations with Russia to the elected President Trump. With such a build-up of forces, the budget for which has already been planned and approved, Trump will be deprived of the possibility of a quick geopolitical maneuver. Probably, in the first year of government, he will not be able to radically rebuild relations with Russia, if such a “restructuring” falls into his plans at all. Most likely, Mr. Trump will not deal with detente with Moscow in the first year of his presidency, but will be exploring the possibility of canceling some of Obama's domestic legislation, in particular Obamacare, a package of health care reforms that Republicans have long disliked. And Moscow will wait.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    10 January 2017 06: 22
    In general, this is very serious .. We need to take care of strengthening the grouping in the west. That, in principle, is already being done ..
    1. +5
      10 January 2017 07: 33
      Judging by the color of the tanks, this scrap metal is being driven from somewhere in the Middle East, most likely from Iraq! I think that this is from the series "Take, oh my God, what is not good for us!", Only so that the Poles and the Balts would not finally dress up their trousers and calmly fall asleep with a smile and thoughts that America is with them!
      laughing
      Nevertheless, Russia simply does not have the right to ignore such a trick!
    2. 0
      10 January 2017 14: 19
      Quote: 210ox
      In general, this is very serious .. We need to take care of strengthening the grouping in the west. That, in principle, is already being done ..

      Well yes. Everything is being done to completely ruin the Baltic states. EU money is no longer going to the Ignalina NPP parsing. To strengthen NATO, it is necessary to increase spending; Russia is no longer using the ports of the Baltic states. So it turns out: wherever you throw, the wedge is everywhere.
  2. +2
    10 January 2017 06: 54
    "Hundreds of tanks" - how many? Somehow sickly for hundreds of tanks, 4000 servicemen. And in general, 2800 units of equipment for 4000 people. slightly a bit too much. Something does not agree in the presentation of information.
    1. +8
      10 January 2017 07: 52
      Quote: inkass_98
      And in general, 2800 pieces of equipment for 4000 people. a bit too much

      personnel can be thrown over the air, and equipment will already be waiting in warehouses.
    2. +1
      10 January 2017 09: 53
      Part of the equipment will be stored. In which case (maybe during an unexpected evacuation) there would be something to do ..
      Quote: inkass_98
      "Hundreds of tanks" - how many? Somehow sickly for hundreds of tanks, 4000 servicemen. And in general, 2800 units of equipment for 4000 people. slightly a bit too much. Something does not agree in the presentation of information.
  3. +4
    10 January 2017 07: 42
    I read here for some it’s all the DPRK's fault! belay it’s not being deployed against Russia, but against the DPRK wassat
    1. cap
      +4
      10 January 2017 08: 04
      Quote: Uncle Murzik
      I read here for some it’s all the DPRK's fault! belay it’s not being deployed against Russia, but against the DPRK wassat

      Tanks are painted under the desert, then to Iran, after 404 further by sea ... Tricky .... laughing
  4. +3
    10 January 2017 08: 04
    We need to accelerate the creation of a second tank army!
    1. +4
      10 January 2017 08: 44
      Uncle lee
      We need to accelerate the creation of a second tank army!
      What for? What a savagery to chase after them in numbers. Passed already. There are cheaper ways to neutralize the threat. To release a dozen Iskander with more nuclear warheads, for example.
      1. +3
        10 January 2017 13: 38
        You, the strategists, know better .... And I think the old fashioned way!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    10 January 2017 08: 09
    From pine forest, here you have a new forest. It is clear that adequate measures will be taken from our side. After all, Western technology is likely to remain in the Baltic states.
  6. +1
    10 January 2017 08: 25
    The more tanks a "potential enemy" has on the front line, the easier it is to destroy it "if necessary".
  7. +4
    10 January 2017 08: 31
    It is silly to think seriously that the Americans will rush across the ocean to replenish the brigade to full strength in the event of a grandiose nix. Service and instructor personnel are now being deployed to train Chukhonsk and other Polish "meat". There is a systematic strengthening of the NATO occupation forces in the occupied post-Soviet territories.
  8. sq
    +2
    10 January 2017 08: 36
    I wonder if the steel is good there? And then when this scrap metal will have to be sent for remelting, how many additives and additives will be needed.
  9. 0
    10 January 2017 08: 57
    "Perestroika" will take place only by 18.
    Trump will be tied with traditions and other crap.
    And he himself will seek how to strengthen his influence, at whose expense.
    It will be just life — trading and maneuvering, including bananas and banana republics.
    We are weak and slowly gaining strength.
    "The Russians are slowly harnessing ..."
    Gl - do not stop when we accelerate, and the "partners" will definitely ask you to slow down in 3-5 years.
    After all, "they understand everything and have always stood for mutually respectful relations, taking into account the concerns and interests of the High Contracting Parties" (without taking into account the interests of the low contracting parties ... ") and the speech will be delayed for another 3 hours.
    In short: we will take only that which we can take and hold.
    And not what will be given "on a silver platter"
    I. Sechin already sees how he is becoming the world's largest oil producer (Tillerson will put equipment on a platform in the Kara Sea), but it is necessary to "squeeze" Rosneft in the interests of the country (take something else).
    Not oil, but independence in bringing our engineering products to the world market.
    And "lower" the oil to Pers. the bay sat quietly (ISIS finish off)
    Where is the market, and where is "We" (or we)? In all cases, there will be hundreds of billions of dollars with + - 3-5 billion dollars / year. Bankers will break their heads, counting the loot.
    Maybe you need to choose your heart? Why does the soul lie and live on its own money, with its mind and on its own land?
  10. 0
    10 January 2017 10: 42
    The expert considers the creation of two tank armies “on the borders of Latvia and Lithuania” to be the best option.
    This is not an expert, but a diot! but what came from the USA is approx. 2,8 thousand units of military equipment are already serious ... I’m sure.
  11. +3
    10 January 2017 12: 52
    For good reason Lukashenka made a visa-free entry for 80 countries. He now also decides to join NATO, if only to annoy Russia more.
  12. 0
    10 January 2017 16: 02
    87 battle tanks Ml A2 "Abram", more than 90 infantry fighting vehicles M2 "Bradley", 32 combat reconnaissance vehicles M3 "Bradley" and 66 M113 armored personnel carriers of various modifications, 18 155-mm self-propelled howitzers M109 "Paladin" and 18 120-mm self-propelled mortars, 84 ATGM "Javelin".
    1. 0
      12 January 2017 09: 44
      For exercises, it will not be enough for an attempt to rock the boat in the Kaliningrad region.
  13. 0
    10 January 2017 21: 51
    The expert considers the creation of two tank armies “on the borders of Latvia and Lithuania” to be the best option. “In this case, the alliance will have no illusions that it can take over the Kaliningrad region”


    There is another option. Defeat some objects in the center of the map. In the first minutes of a mess. And then everything will not go as we would like in the Pentagon.
  14. 0
    10 January 2017 21: 53
    They are European dls. First of all, these tanks and soldiers need the EU to continue to remain a colony of the Yankees. The rest is empty slavery, especially about quick deployment for containment. Unpleasant of course, but not fatal. Strengthen MLRS brigades in dangerous directions and cover from the air more tightly, and let them dare. The blow of four Tornado-Gs is equal to tactical nuclear munitions. In the yard is not the 40s of the past, it will not come out suddenly.
  15. 0
    12 January 2017 00: 11
    And now the Balts will climb into the tanks and look with a fierce frown on the border to the east, will the Russian hordes go to pick up their sprat factories, or will the Americans sit there and arrogantly demand from local Aborigines, drinks and girls.
  16. 0
    12 January 2017 09: 39
    In which case:
    personnel can be flown over the air, and equipment will already be waiting in warehouses.

    Are you sure to fly? But are you sure the technician will be in the warehouses in the form in which they were put there?
    As a result, the United States will be able to create a powerful shock fist on the borders of the Kaliningrad region within two weeks.

    While you are creating, dozens of missiles will already be aimed at us with this fist, all that remains is to press a button.
    In this case, the alliance will have no illusions that it can take over the Kaliningrad region

    Freshly a tradition. The guys forgot about the campaign of the Escanders, the installation of which they themselves also publicized.
    And something tells me that the Baltic Fleet will also not disregard all this swarming.
    1. +1
      13 January 2017 18: 41
      The heroic spirit is felt. I already imagine how you are with a bunch of caps for these tanks ...
  17. 0
    12 January 2017 14: 52
    I'm writing. The condition of the Cold War is the presence of two antagonistic world systems: capitalist and communist. Since the Russian Federation is a backward (in the capitalist sense) bourgeois state, and in the USA the United States is the leader of developed capitalism, there is no antagonism. Therefore, there is no "cold war". If a communist revolution takes place in the USA, which the Bolsheviks have been talking about all the time, then the Russian Federation will remain an island of wild capitalism in a hostile communist environment. Peaceful coexistence of the Russian Federation in such conditions can be called a "cold war". But I suspect that Washington will try to arrange a socialist revolution in Moscow.
  18. +1
    13 January 2017 07: 48
    In Kaliningrad, it's time to plant trees, you look to take root, oh well on a hot day for a walk in the shade of poplars)