Putin and Europe
The tectonic shifts occurring before our eyes in world politics have their own logic, and this logic points to some kind of global backstage: although it did not show its face, it discovered its traces. It all started with Brexit, which actually happened recently, in the summer of 2016, and how much happened after it ...
Its then Prime Minister Cameron initiated the exit of Great Britain from the European Union, as if overpowering himself, he announced and held a referendum on the withdrawal of Britain from the European Union. At the same time he publicly agitated “for Europe”, expressed confidence that the referendum would say “no” to “Brexit”, and, singing “doo-doo-doo”, resigned after the referendum said “yes”. It was so unexpected for everyone! .. But it was beneficial to Putin, the “free world press” went into hysterics.
“If you didn’t want to leave the European Union, why did you hold a referendum?” Vladimir Putin asked a natural question at a press conference, but Cameron left it unanswered. In our opinion, Cameron is a hypocrite, this is so befitting the appearance of an English politician! The correct answer is: he had no choice but to hold a referendum and resign.
The political science community, for the most part, predicted the failure of the British referendum, and only a minority, including myself in my articles, which is easy to verify, expressed confidence that Brexit would take place. The reasons were simple: if a powerful top holds a referendum, then it will certainly give a positive result, otherwise it would not be carried out, as indicated by Vladimir Putin.
The British top needed a positive referendum to get an excuse for an urgent exit from the European Union. The current British Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, and his companions then carried demagogy about the benefits of a country outside the European Union, which was not at all obvious. And today it becomes clear what was behind this demagogy.
It is safe to say that the real reason for Brexit is the preparation for the coming of Donald Trump to the White House of Washington. In London, someone knew that Donald Trump unexpectedly won the presidential election, when all observers predicted his defeat, and begin to radically change the US policy, including towards Europe, and rushed to hold a referendum on secession from the European Union.
Trump spoke about his future policy in election speeches, which is not quite correctly called “isolationist”, and it was clear that she was fraught with the collapse of the European Union. Therefore, the British rat first ran from the sinking ship "United Europe" to minimize the costs of this crash.
President Obama then specifically went to London to agitate for "united Europe", but that did not help either ... Why? US elites, and most likely, not only the United States, decided to destroy the "united Europe". Although they will never say it openly, because this is big politics, which is always a big lie, as unrecognized philosophers say.
Recall that the entire 2016 year, Obama persuaded the European Union to accept a clear and transparent proposal: to become the united colony of the United States, to sign, finally, the Transatlantic Partnership, briefly - TTiP, how many red lines did Obama spend ... the European Union did not sign, ignored the request of the only superpower, for him - exactly the only one. Instead of TTiP, the European Union concluded CETA with Canada, which the United States could also honor for mockery.
So it is impossible to relate to the proposals of the superpower, especially its full satellite. Therefore, instead of Obama, instead of his successors like Clinton, Donald Trump comes to the White House, with a completely different proposal for Europe, and Asia too. Trump's coming to the White House in Washington is a direct consequence of the European Union’s refusal of the Trans-Atlantic partnership with America. The president of the United States is becoming a person who is also opposed to all trans-partnerships of America, albeit for other reasons, and with an alternative policy to these partnerships.
Berlin is behind the EU’s decision to reject TTiP, we note that the Brexit was preceded by a sharp cooling between London, the US lobbyist in Europe, and Berlin. Germany, the main economy of Europe, in spite of London, pushed through Jean-Claude Juncker’s appointment as head of the European Commission, that is, she set out to restructure the European Union for herself. But in such a Europe there is no place for the American aircraft carrier "Britain" - this is another reason for the unexpected "Brexit".
It should be expected that the main blow of the United States to Trump will therefore be directed at Berlin. The United States will secretly support all its satellites against Berlin as the unifier of Europe. This means that Euro-skeptics will come to power in all major European countries, from France to Italy and Holland, and, possibly, in Germany itself. The London Times has already come forward with this prophecy, but again attributed all these European zrady to Vladimir Putin, according to the Brexit method. What can you do: big western politics is a big lie!
Is Russia involved in the creation of the European Union and is its strategic ally? How can she have a decisive influence on something that has nothing to do with? Should Moscow worry about the stability of Europe? Is Europe worried about Russia's stability? For this, and imposed sanctions? However, to tell about the present beneficiary of the collapse of Europe “The Times” can not ...
And what are the reasons Trump, and the elites behind him, what is their approach to the world? “First America ...” From the point of view of Trump, there is a paradoxical situation when welfare, living standards, in the USA itself, the metropolis (!), Are significantly inferior to its satellites, in Europe and Asia. The United States bears 70-80% of the costs of maintaining “world democracy” with gay values, in addition to NATO, provide security for all their satellites in the world almost free of charge. How much can you tolerate! It is easy to see that in this the United States is fully following the path of the USSR, and Trump, and his friends, see this and want to turn away from this "world path." They do not want the fate of the USSR, the collapse of which, by the way, was predicted by Trump himself in the 80s of the last century.
All top observers expect isolationist politics from Trump, they are moaning about this, which, most likely, is also an element of big lie. The principle of "first America" does not mean that the United States will give up the world.
If gay managers Obama failed to correct the situation for the United States with the help of TTiP, if Europe refused to go under the United States in an amicable way, according to the TTiP plan, then Trump will lead her to submission in a different way. He will solve this problem in other ways, which he spoke about in his pre-election speeches: all satellites will have to pay overdue bills to America. While the United States of Trump will direct, thus, the order in his yard, with Russia, it is naturally better to maintain good relations so that it does not interfere. Therefore, Trump is such a “pro-Russian” ...
And what about Russia? At his last Big Press Conference, Vladimir Putin said that Russia needs an independent Europe. If this is impossible, you have to do business with individual countries, nothing can be done. In other words, Russia is not against the transformation of the “dependent” EU into the German project of a united Europe, but there is no certainty that Germany will be able to implement it.
The convergence of Russia and Germany today, in a visible way, is hindered by Chancellor Merkel, but perhaps this is also a big policy bluff: “Nord Stream” and ORAL are loaded with Gazprom to the limit, “Nord Stream - 2” will be built. It builds the energy union of Russia and Germany, whatever Merkel says.
Russia, by and large, unprofitable chaos at his side, that in Ukraine, in Western Europe. Because at your side. But the United States is far, they are not dangerous chaos in Europe, however, you can catch fish in its muddy water. The capital does not like instability, and will rush from Europe to a safe haven - to America.
The most important question: will Putin go to Europe? Should Russia get into America’s squabbles with Europe? Russia well remembers that Europe never remembers good. Nonetheless, when the United States opposes Berlin, which unites Europe under its auspices, when Trump begins to collect debts from her, will Putin then go to Europe? Who knows?…
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Primakov's vis-à-vis and Trump's advisor, in the theme of this Big Game, spoke out in the media: “Putin will wait ...”
... Interestingly, the global gay democracy still cannot come to terms with the victory of Donald Trump, and its main fighter was not Soros, not Clinton and not Obama, but John Brennan, the director of the CIA. He alone continues to fiercely defend the “values of democracy” from the “Russian hackers”, although Trump is already laughing: this is not how to understand the situation, and this is the director of the CIA ... Or is a marazmatic fanatic simply unable to stop?
But Hillary Clinton has already agreed to come on January 20 for the inauguration of President Donald Trump. She understands, or she was told in confidence, that the issue of Trump and his policy has been resolved in areas where Brennan, Soros, Obama and Clinton herself are barred from entering. World backstage, you see, is only for billionaires, by special invitation.
Its then Prime Minister Cameron initiated the exit of Great Britain from the European Union, as if overpowering himself, he announced and held a referendum on the withdrawal of Britain from the European Union. At the same time he publicly agitated “for Europe”, expressed confidence that the referendum would say “no” to “Brexit”, and, singing “doo-doo-doo”, resigned after the referendum said “yes”. It was so unexpected for everyone! .. But it was beneficial to Putin, the “free world press” went into hysterics.
“If you didn’t want to leave the European Union, why did you hold a referendum?” Vladimir Putin asked a natural question at a press conference, but Cameron left it unanswered. In our opinion, Cameron is a hypocrite, this is so befitting the appearance of an English politician! The correct answer is: he had no choice but to hold a referendum and resign.
The political science community, for the most part, predicted the failure of the British referendum, and only a minority, including myself in my articles, which is easy to verify, expressed confidence that Brexit would take place. The reasons were simple: if a powerful top holds a referendum, then it will certainly give a positive result, otherwise it would not be carried out, as indicated by Vladimir Putin.
The British top needed a positive referendum to get an excuse for an urgent exit from the European Union. The current British Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, and his companions then carried demagogy about the benefits of a country outside the European Union, which was not at all obvious. And today it becomes clear what was behind this demagogy.
It is safe to say that the real reason for Brexit is the preparation for the coming of Donald Trump to the White House of Washington. In London, someone knew that Donald Trump unexpectedly won the presidential election, when all observers predicted his defeat, and begin to radically change the US policy, including towards Europe, and rushed to hold a referendum on secession from the European Union.
Trump spoke about his future policy in election speeches, which is not quite correctly called “isolationist”, and it was clear that she was fraught with the collapse of the European Union. Therefore, the British rat first ran from the sinking ship "United Europe" to minimize the costs of this crash.
President Obama then specifically went to London to agitate for "united Europe", but that did not help either ... Why? US elites, and most likely, not only the United States, decided to destroy the "united Europe". Although they will never say it openly, because this is big politics, which is always a big lie, as unrecognized philosophers say.
Recall that the entire 2016 year, Obama persuaded the European Union to accept a clear and transparent proposal: to become the united colony of the United States, to sign, finally, the Transatlantic Partnership, briefly - TTiP, how many red lines did Obama spend ... the European Union did not sign, ignored the request of the only superpower, for him - exactly the only one. Instead of TTiP, the European Union concluded CETA with Canada, which the United States could also honor for mockery.
So it is impossible to relate to the proposals of the superpower, especially its full satellite. Therefore, instead of Obama, instead of his successors like Clinton, Donald Trump comes to the White House, with a completely different proposal for Europe, and Asia too. Trump's coming to the White House in Washington is a direct consequence of the European Union’s refusal of the Trans-Atlantic partnership with America. The president of the United States is becoming a person who is also opposed to all trans-partnerships of America, albeit for other reasons, and with an alternative policy to these partnerships.
Berlin is behind the EU’s decision to reject TTiP, we note that the Brexit was preceded by a sharp cooling between London, the US lobbyist in Europe, and Berlin. Germany, the main economy of Europe, in spite of London, pushed through Jean-Claude Juncker’s appointment as head of the European Commission, that is, she set out to restructure the European Union for herself. But in such a Europe there is no place for the American aircraft carrier "Britain" - this is another reason for the unexpected "Brexit".
It should be expected that the main blow of the United States to Trump will therefore be directed at Berlin. The United States will secretly support all its satellites against Berlin as the unifier of Europe. This means that Euro-skeptics will come to power in all major European countries, from France to Italy and Holland, and, possibly, in Germany itself. The London Times has already come forward with this prophecy, but again attributed all these European zrady to Vladimir Putin, according to the Brexit method. What can you do: big western politics is a big lie!
Is Russia involved in the creation of the European Union and is its strategic ally? How can she have a decisive influence on something that has nothing to do with? Should Moscow worry about the stability of Europe? Is Europe worried about Russia's stability? For this, and imposed sanctions? However, to tell about the present beneficiary of the collapse of Europe “The Times” can not ...
And what are the reasons Trump, and the elites behind him, what is their approach to the world? “First America ...” From the point of view of Trump, there is a paradoxical situation when welfare, living standards, in the USA itself, the metropolis (!), Are significantly inferior to its satellites, in Europe and Asia. The United States bears 70-80% of the costs of maintaining “world democracy” with gay values, in addition to NATO, provide security for all their satellites in the world almost free of charge. How much can you tolerate! It is easy to see that in this the United States is fully following the path of the USSR, and Trump, and his friends, see this and want to turn away from this "world path." They do not want the fate of the USSR, the collapse of which, by the way, was predicted by Trump himself in the 80s of the last century.
All top observers expect isolationist politics from Trump, they are moaning about this, which, most likely, is also an element of big lie. The principle of "first America" does not mean that the United States will give up the world.
If gay managers Obama failed to correct the situation for the United States with the help of TTiP, if Europe refused to go under the United States in an amicable way, according to the TTiP plan, then Trump will lead her to submission in a different way. He will solve this problem in other ways, which he spoke about in his pre-election speeches: all satellites will have to pay overdue bills to America. While the United States of Trump will direct, thus, the order in his yard, with Russia, it is naturally better to maintain good relations so that it does not interfere. Therefore, Trump is such a “pro-Russian” ...
And what about Russia? At his last Big Press Conference, Vladimir Putin said that Russia needs an independent Europe. If this is impossible, you have to do business with individual countries, nothing can be done. In other words, Russia is not against the transformation of the “dependent” EU into the German project of a united Europe, but there is no certainty that Germany will be able to implement it.
The convergence of Russia and Germany today, in a visible way, is hindered by Chancellor Merkel, but perhaps this is also a big policy bluff: “Nord Stream” and ORAL are loaded with Gazprom to the limit, “Nord Stream - 2” will be built. It builds the energy union of Russia and Germany, whatever Merkel says.
Russia, by and large, unprofitable chaos at his side, that in Ukraine, in Western Europe. Because at your side. But the United States is far, they are not dangerous chaos in Europe, however, you can catch fish in its muddy water. The capital does not like instability, and will rush from Europe to a safe haven - to America.
The most important question: will Putin go to Europe? Should Russia get into America’s squabbles with Europe? Russia well remembers that Europe never remembers good. Nonetheless, when the United States opposes Berlin, which unites Europe under its auspices, when Trump begins to collect debts from her, will Putin then go to Europe? Who knows?…
Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Primakov's vis-à-vis and Trump's advisor, in the theme of this Big Game, spoke out in the media: “Putin will wait ...”
... Interestingly, the global gay democracy still cannot come to terms with the victory of Donald Trump, and its main fighter was not Soros, not Clinton and not Obama, but John Brennan, the director of the CIA. He alone continues to fiercely defend the “values of democracy” from the “Russian hackers”, although Trump is already laughing: this is not how to understand the situation, and this is the director of the CIA ... Or is a marazmatic fanatic simply unable to stop?
But Hillary Clinton has already agreed to come on January 20 for the inauguration of President Donald Trump. She understands, or she was told in confidence, that the issue of Trump and his policy has been resolved in areas where Brennan, Soros, Obama and Clinton herself are barred from entering. World backstage, you see, is only for billionaires, by special invitation.
Information