Why the West will never beat the Russian bear?

16
The Russian army has always fought off any adversary. So NATO can not brag about size - in vain. Look at least at the latest reports of our Ministry of Defense, and you will understand that the West will never defeat a Russian bear!



    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    16 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. cap
      +5
      7 January 2017 17: 33
      A good combat leaflet. The name is life-affirming. However, I note that recently the upcoming battle between two or several opponents at once will not look like a tank biathlon or air darts competition at all. The newly-minted experts present the war and preparations for it as a kind of competition, counting who has bigger or wider. I consider this a dangerous fallacy. In nuclear war, one important question remains who or what the winners will get. Contaminated territory and mythical bowels that cannot be drunk , food that you can’t eat. The main thing is not to lose people who still would like to live with a bear winner, and not with a crap crow, a dragon, or whoever has their coat of arms there. But that doesn’t matter.
      That something like this.
      1. +1
        8 January 2017 08: 06
        Quote: cap
        The main thing is not to lose people who still would like to live with a bear winner,

        There will be no winners in a nuclear war! The survivors will slide into a bestial state and will tear each other's throats for a piece of grub ... until they die from radiation. Who needs such a victory? request
      2. +2
        8 January 2017 15: 37
        Quote: cap
        .Main important not to lose people who still would like to live with a bear winner

        That's for sure.
        1. cap
          +1
          8 January 2017 16: 24
          Quote: Ivan Tucha
          Quote: cap
          .Main important not to lose people who still would like to live with a bear winner

          That's for sure.

          Bayonet Today, 08:06 ↑ There will be no winners in a nuclear war! The survivors will slide into a bestial state and will tear each other's throats for a piece of grub.


          Do not lose people
          I meant YOUR PEOPLE on my territory, and for this we need an ideology urging people not to slide into a bestial state in an emergency, as one of the elements of civil defense that has long been successfully forgotten. The truth is not the topic of today's discussion. hi
          1. 0
            8 January 2017 18: 20
            Quote: cap
            Not to lose people, I mean OUR PEOPLE on my territory, and for this we need an ideology urging people not to slide into a bestial state

            Blessed is he who believes! Where will she go - ideology, when hell comes! Where did the communist ideology that existed in the country for 70 years (and this in peacetime) go, and how did the people rush into all seriousness - half are swindlers and bandits, the other, who dropped their hands, were terpily. Such is the "ideology" hi
    2. +4
      7 January 2017 17: 39
      The worst thing in a war is not fighting, but the actions of collaborators in acupuncture territories, the troubles and deprivations of the civilian population, hunger, looting and the lack of the most necessary.
    3. +5
      7 January 2017 19: 10
      Russian bear West never win!

      Only die, along with the Russian bear ... But I think no one is ready to die ...
    4. +5
      7 January 2017 19: 41
      Why should they fight when the Chubaisoids rule? The population of Russia, together with inflation and the economy, is approaching zero. Everything is according to plan.
    5. +6
      7 January 2017 20: 08
      As long as Russia has a nuclear shield, there will be no war. At the same time, I note that it’s Sakharov’s case, and the appearance of Status-6 completely reduces the West’s efforts to a military scenario. At the same time, the scenario of Status-6 is not applicable to Russia, unlike Europe, America or England ... At the same time, no missile defense can hinder such torpedoes.
      But Western experts, like a mantra, repeat that the story with Status-6 is just words and fake. But I don’t remember something that Putin spoke about something just like that.
      1. +1
        8 January 2017 11: 56
        And there is also a "dead hand" when there are no living in the country and the response to the enemy's country occurs and you know about it. But this answer will be the last for the planet Earth. Something like that. It's a pity only our children and grandchildren will die. But there will be no tan either.
    6. +2
      7 January 2017 20: 38
      The US military doctrine does not mean laying its head for a mythical victory. China is not so much on its feet to get in touch with Russia, which just covers the whole North from the interference of other countries.
      The rest of the countries do not dare to battle with Russia.
      1. +4
        7 January 2017 21: 38
        American military doctrine does not mean laying one's head for a mythical victory.

        I won’t envy anyone who decides to try the bear’s death grip on their throat ... They can only get into the bugs and drive them out of the puddle ... The Triebaltes were so scared that they had dug up the caches for a long time, every day they were preparing for the invasion ....
    7. +1
      8 January 2017 13: 44
      The military doctrine of the Americans is a foreign war on foreign territory. So it doesn’t matter who is ready to die or not, it’s still necessary for the happiness of the Anglo-Saxons. Therefore, we must prepare.
    8. +1
      8 January 2017 15: 29
      Quote: glory1974
      The military doctrine of the Americans is a foreign war on foreign territory. So it doesn’t matter who is ready to die or not, it’s still necessary for the happiness of the Anglo-Saxons. Therefore, we must prepare.
    9. 0
      8 January 2017 15: 30
      Quote: Bayonet
      Quote: cap
      The main thing is not to lose people who still would like to live with a bear winner,

      There will be no winners in a nuclear war! The survivors will slide into a bestial state and will tear each other's throats for a piece of grub ... until they die from radiation. Who needs such a victory? request
    10. 0
      12 January 2017 16: 15
      Poor knowledge of history is not responsible. It was said whoever comes to us with a sword will receive from him.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"