Russia-USA. Housing problem
And there was information that Henry Kissinger himself volunteered to "reconcile" the United States and Russia. And even a kind of solid plan for this has developed. Well, Sir Kissinger is a secretive man and doesn’t share his plans with the press, then we read what the National Interest in the article "Stop Teasing a Bear" writes on this burning subject. What, in fact, fellow Americans offer / can offer. And then joyful squeals and squeals were heard that, say, we will be friends with “Amyrykans” houses ... As we know, “press leaks” is a classic method to test the opponent's reaction. From the press / journalists, what is the demand from them? They write, you know, everything that comes into my head ...
So: “Trump should start with Ukraine, a country of key strategic importance for Russia, but not very important for America.” . Sorry, here you are literally starting to laugh like a regimental horse. They want to start with Ukraine, homegrown strategists ... No, more three years ago, we still had some interest in this country, Putin won even a loan to Yanukovych and offered a portfolio of orders for ukroindustrii. Tell someone that was then? Long, epic and bloody story European integration of “European Europeans”.
And after three bloody years, after the massacres, the collapse of the economy and a million refugees, after open calls for the murder of Russians in Ukraine and after the murders of these Russians (we have not forgotten and not forgiven), gentlemen Americans suddenly ask themselves: is Ukraine? And do not give it to Russian podobra-goodbye? Somehow they think for a long time, by golly. Back in the 2004 year, Ukraine really had key value for the Russian Federation. She was very, very important for Putin’s plans. But it was too long ago. Since then, there have been two successful Maidan, economic ties along the Moscow-Kiev line have been severed, the relationship has been completely ruined.
Who, why and how will it all be restored? No, theoretically? At whose expense is the banquet? Russia paid billions for transferring critical industries from Ukraine and duplicating them at home. Now pay again and return everything back? What for? Why should we today need Ukraine? What can she offer interesting? The failure to supply engines hit the Russian shipbuilding program extremely painfully. Who then will make orders at Ukrainian factories? What, I'm sorry, you fool? All the guys, love is gone, wilted tomatoes ...
Moreover, because of the wrecking, pro-American position of Ukroelit, Russia was forced to spend tens of billions of dollars on the construction of pipelines around Of Ukraine. Monstrous diplomatic efforts were expended on this, and when the process is nearing completion - after a couple of years the transit through Ukraine will stop, we are offered to be friends with Kiev again. Thanks guys a little late. Brilliant Americans are going to give us Ukraine exactly when it has ceased to be necessary to us.
While there was the Crimea / Black Sea Fleet, Pipe, deliveries of knots critical for the defense industry and attempts to establish normal relations with Kiev, there was constant blackmail and constant attempts to “shit in sneakers”. And when Russia overcame its dependence on Ukraine, politics changes dramatically ... What smart guys these Americans are - they squeezed everything out of Ukraine, and now it is no longer necessary for them and they are trying to write it off balance ... No, if the conversation had gone on for years so ten years ago, it would be quite possible to agree. Now Ukraine Russia is no longer needed.
And here we must remember not only that the economy is completely destroyed there and it will take many years and hundreds of billions of euros to restore it, but also that the Ukrainian elites brought up over the past twenty years are completely Russophobic. How to work with them in Moscow? And with whom in general to work in Moscow in Ukraine? Who is there ready to follow the instructions of the Kremlin? What language should we talk? It is clear that the Russophobic party that has developed in Ukraine as a “political elite” is completely satisfied with the West. It is also clear that these people are absolutely not satisfied with Russia.
It should also be noted that over the past three years, attitudes towards Ukraine and Ukrainians in Russia abruptly worsened, in fact today, Ukrainians from “theirs” have finally turned into “hostile aliens” as a result of frank, targeted aggression on their part towards the Russians. By the way, this (setting Ukrainians against Russians) was done quite deliberately by Ukrainian and Western politicians. And then suddenly such a turn ...
In short, this is all late, meaningless and useless. Forget, just forget. While Ukraine was somehow interested in Russia, the West “fought” for it. When the interest wanes, they make us a "royal proposal." No, thanks. We’ll better stand on foot.
“Secondly, the president-elect must assure Russia that the West does not claim to Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova and Belarus — and, for that matter, to any other countries with Orthodox Christian tradition ...” Interesting, insanely interesting. So, the list of Orthodox countries: Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro, Greece, Cyprus. And what, just a royal proposal, just breathtaking. I understand that Greece, Bulgaria and Romania will have to be excluded from NATO / EU for this? Or how? Or they will remain in the EU / NATO, but at the same time like will be listed in the Russian sphere of influence? No, about any countries with Orthodox tradition, it is not me who is writing, it is Americans from the "National Interest" who are writing.
So how are we going to include Romania in Russian World? Who has any ideas? Russophobic country, tightly integrated into European structures. Of course, I really like scientific, near-scientific and political fiction, but not so much. And even Bulgaria is a country with a collapsed economy and an endangered population. And Russophobic elites focused on serving the West. No, not interesting, thanks. And technically, what is it like? A telegram arrives in Sofia from Washington that you are no longer in the EU or in NATO (we sold / exchanged you for greyhounds puppies)? And what are all the questions now to Putin? Funny, huh?
Does Montenegro seem to be dragged into that very NATO organization with a scandal (right now)? So what? Even a small Montenegro. For Georgia, the question is as if closed tightly. The war was between the "brotherly Orthodox nations." Thanks to the Americans, by the way, was. Relations between Russia and Georgia are spoiled for generations to come. After the attack on peacekeepers in South Ossetia, many Russians do not count Georgians among their friends. Orthodox brothers, they are ... Orthodox. Georgia in the Russian sphere of influence? Funny.
On claims by Belarus from the West - if there is such a person as Putin in the Kremlin - then it is possible to play up to nuclear strikes. So do not. Just forget about Minsk. Why do you need a personal dosimeter for everyone? By the way, he was always interested in how blacks transfer radiation - is it worse or better than whites? Full-scale tests will be conducted? Or theoretical calculations we restrict ourselves?
Greece and Cyprus in the Russian zone of influence is just a fairy tale! In all respects, a fairy tale for young children, and we are adults. It seems that the author does not fully understand which countries are Orthodox.
"Third", about Assad, but it is banal and uninteresting and sucked many times (the enemy is LIH, not Assad). Well, here somehow a little late to go on “concessions” - Russia “pulled out a war”. Interesting, yes? Both with Ukraine and with Syria, if the continuation of the conflict of bonuses the United States no longer carries, then yes, they are ready to make "concessions". But not a second before.
But the “fourth” is already interesting: "Through a diplomatic campaign aimed at dispelling Russia's indignation and fears over the expansion of the Western alliance to the east, the United States should try to dissuade Russia from the need to get too close to China ..." This is already interesting, this is already very interesting. "Strong relations between Russia and China are contrary to the interests of America." That's it, Mikhalych, and the men didn’t know ...
This is exactly what else under Yeltsin (!) Began to engage in at the end of 90, turning to China. The air rout of Yugoslavia put an end to the history of the “friendship” of Russia and the West. And when the main part of the work on creating the Russian-Chinese alliance was done, in Washington, someone finally sobered up from unprecedented imperial greatness. The alliance of Russia and China contradicts ... well, yes, it contradicts. Putin, by the way, at first actively tried to work with the West, they did not hear him, did not want to hear. Even the legendary “Munich speech” sounded wasted. And so now... When it turned out that "China is the country that has the greatest potential to challenge America’s role in the world, pushing it out of Asia." Then im suddenly Russia was required.
That is, after 25 years celebrating the victory in the Cold War, it suddenly turns out that "It would be extremely unwise and even rash on the part of America to have hostile relations with Russia too." "And in the morning they woke up ..."
The trouble with the United States is that categorically nothing to offer Russia. This should have been thought much earlier. In Georgia and Ukraine, questions were closed during tough military conflicts. To offer these countries to Russia today is somewhat tactless, it had to be done a couple of moves back. Suggest Romania (EU / NATO member) is somewhat strange, to say the least. We already have the Crimea, Donbass is talking to lovers of European integration with artillery language.
The article emphasizes that the West should be ready for war for “the Baltic countries”. It would be possible to dwell on this, since the membership of these states bordering on Russia in NATO means a constant factor of tension.
In general, from the point of view of the author, the membership of Estonia / Latvia / Lithuania in NATO is a huge plus for Russian policy in the sense that it completely excludes the possibility of a compromise with the West. As long as NATO troops are in the Baltic states, there will never be friendship (and even neutrality) between Russia and NATO, and pro-Western politicians will not be at the helm of Russia either. This is about how Hitler captured the Channel Islands. He could not get out of there for reasons of prestige, but the fact of the occupation of British territory ...
So, NATO will not leave the Baltics, so all conversations "for friendship" with the West will end in nothing.
In general, at first glance, Russia’s article offers a lot, just a bunch of concessions. When you start to disassemble and analyze this very "bunch", then your surprise will not be limits (this is how to disassemble the bag of a homeless). There is either what we already have (like the Crimea), or what we don’t need for nothing (like Ukraine / Georgia), or what will be extremely difficult to transfer, like the Orthodox NATO countries ... or the same Georgia / Ukraine, who hate us. Gentlemen you really what do you offer? Nothing? Do you need to quarrel with China in return? An interesting offer, very interesting. Just exciting. Explicitly calculated on clinical idiots.
“So, diplomacy should be given a chance” - this is how the article ends. I agree, the chance of diplomacy had to be given. But I had to give it much earlier. Somewhere at the end of 90's. But who then was interested in Russia? And even in the middle of 0's. And in the morning they woke up: the revival of Russia, the rise of China, their union ... And they begin to offer something. If anything, then Obama also started with a "reset" of relations. And how did it all end? The Americans could not “climb” to Ukraine. As a result, there are fragments from Ukraine, from Russian-American relations too.
Now what will we discuss? Russian sovereignty over the Kuban? It’s about how: for an offensive, one arrangement of troops is needed, for defense, it is somewhat different. So, the NATO / EU configuration is ideal for an offensive against Russia, for “friendship” ... Already in the times of the “Obama reset”, veterans of the American special services said that reaching a compromise is possible only on the basis of the “spheres of influence” section. Well, where is our area? Cut it to me! Romanian gypsies, mind you, do not offer!
Since 2009, the situation has only worsened. Then the Americans still had a chance to “give up Ukraine”, today there is no such chance: in the Donbass many years have been fierce battles, there is mutual hatred between Russians and Ukrainians, no one in Russia is going to “feed Bandera”. With Georgia, the question was tightly closed to Obama. The Baltic States are a never-ending conflict zone. True, the author of the cited article seriously recommends that the Balkan countries of NATO, seen in Orthodoxy (or simply do not know who is Orthodox in Europe), should be transferred to Putin’s balance ... War and Germans.
So there is at least one Kissinger, at least a dozen: US there is nothing offer Russia. Such a nonsense turned out: our globe is over.
And about Ukraine, they write well: “In this country there was a tragic split, as a result of which Ukraine was divided into West-oriented residents of the western regions and ethnic Russians in the eastern regions. Russia has been able to cope with this delicate situation for several decades - let it remain so. ” "Robyaty", you know what year in the yard? What is the millennium in the yard? And what's going on in Ukraine?
It seems that they are analyzing the situation in Eastern Europe almost the end of the 90-s. And make us interesting offers. That's just just the Americans did not suffer in principle "bagatovectornost." They worked, the interests of Russia without taking into account categorically. And as we all understand - they are from Bulgaria, Croatia ... They have swept under Eastern Europe. Sealed. And then suddenly something should be offered to Russia. Something serious, and the circus begins.
Already from the very American “analysis” it becomes absolutely clear that even the “kindest American toad” cannot offer us anything.
Take everything ... take everything ... three dried limitromof ... nothing is pitiful.
- Oleg Egorov
- No more your america
Why it is impossible to buy the Russian elite
Assertive Yankees in the Swamps of Polissya
Sudden Trump
F-35 as America's sunset marker
Information