Eighth Borey submarine laid on Sevmash

49
On Friday, the eighth nuclear submarine carrier of the Borey / Borey-A project Prince Pozharsky was laid on Sevmash.





A mortgage sign with the ship’s name and date was attached to the submarine’s section by the deputy head of the Navy Viktor Bursuk and the vice-president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation Leonid Strugov.

"Prince Pozharsky" will become the 8 nuclear submarine, completing the line of nuclear ships of the Borey project and the fifth in the line of the nuclear submarine of the Borey-A project. Designer - design office of marine equipment "Rubin" (St. Petersburg), "- said in a statement" Sevmash. "



“Of course, we do not stop there. Shipbuilding, like any other sphere, moves in the evolutionary process. Central Design Bureau of Marine Equipment "Rubin" on the instructions of the Naval fleet He’s working on the creation of a new missile carrier that will build the wonderful Sevmash enterprise, the pride of our country, ”Bursuk said at the ceremony.



The length of the submarine of this project is 170 m, the width is 13,5 m, the underwater displacement is 24 thousand tons. The submarine can carry the P-16 "Bulava" onboard to 30 MBR.
  • http://kuleshovoleg.livejournal.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    24 December 2016 10: 41
    The next project will be called Borya-E. Or according to NATO classification - "EBN"
    .
    1. +2
      24 December 2016 10: 43
      Hot news. 1,5 days have passed. And about the T-90?
      1. 0
        24 December 2016 10: 49
        What about the t-90?
        1. +5
          24 December 2016 11: 07
          It seems like he withstood ATGM aboard a tower near the T-4.
          1. +6
            24 December 2016 12: 27
            "Prince Pozharsky" will become the 8 nuclear submarine, completing the line of nuclear ships of the Borey project and the fifth in the line of the nuclear submarine of the Borey-A project. Designer - design office of marine equipment "Rubin" (St. Petersburg), "- said in a statement" Sevmash. "


            This is probably the best amount to contain the adversaries.
            1. +2
              24 December 2016 13: 54
              Quote: cniza
              this is the optimal amount to deter adversaries.


              Yes, a little, but enough to hold it.

              And, if, it’s not enough for you, buy a couple of pieces and pass the Navy!
              1. +8
                24 December 2016 18: 40
                In addition to Borrei, there are other nuclear submarines that restrain the adversaries))
                And not only the nuclear submarines ...
                1. 0
                  24 December 2016 19: 55
                  Quote: Elena Zakharova
                  In addition to Borrei, there are other nuclear submarines that restrain the adversaries))

                  Really? belay Thanks for the educational program lol
                  "Northwind" is spelled with one letter "p".
                  1. +4
                    8 May 2017 18: 02
                    Did you see a mistake? Well done!
            2. +6
              24 December 2016 15: 28
              Quote: cniza
              This is probably the best amount to contain the adversaries.

              Quote: Titsen
              And, if, it’s not enough for you, buy a couple of pieces and pass the Navy!

              1. This is not enough to restrain the adversary: ​​without VKS with their Strategic Rocket Forces, the adversary cannot be restrained.
              2. This is not enough even for the full-fledged composition of the submarine division: the minimum should be 6-8 units.
              3. Therefore, you are absolutely right: the government will have to "buy" for the Red Banner Command of the Submarine Forces of the KSF and the Red Banner Command of the Submarine Forces of the KTOF, a couple of three more corps. But that is another story".
            3. 0
              26 December 2016 14: 36
              According to the idea, each Borei is opposed to the 1st US aircraft carrier group. And why ... it was necessary to cut and sink the nuclear submarine of project 949A "Antey" ("Kursk", etc.), until new ones were built, that's the question?
          2. 0
            24 December 2016 12: 39
            and you will not throw a link?
            1. +1
              24 December 2016 12: 59
              http://warfiles.ru/show-139298-t-90-v-rayone-bazy
              -t-4-vyderzhal-pryamoe-popadanie-amerikanskoy-rak
              ety-tow.html
          3. cap
            +1
            24 December 2016 15: 56
            Quote: killganoff
            What about the t-90?

            Quote: Muvka
            It seems like he withstood ATGM aboard a tower near the T-4.




            An interesting comment.
            https://vk.com/video-123538639_456241440
            1. +1
              24 December 2016 16: 44
              Quote: cap
              Quote: killganoff
              What about the t-90?

              Quote: Muvka
              It seems like he withstood ATGM aboard a tower near the T-4.




              An interesting comment.
              https://vk.com/video-123538639_456241440

              and with the "news" not late? this video has been online for a month and a half ...
              1. cap
                0
                24 December 2016 16: 59
                https://vk.com/video-123538639_456241440
                The second only link is not on YouTube. There about t-4 hi
              2. cap
                0
                24 December 2016 17: 01
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                and with the "news" not late? This video has been online for a month and a half.

                https://vk.com/video-123538639_456241440
                The second only link is not on YouTube. There about t-4. With a comment hi
                1. 0
                  25 December 2016 00: 14
                  Comrades! I ask you to explain - maybe I don’t understand something

                  I looked where the atomarine bases - one in Hajiyev - right on the border with Norway, the second Vilyuchinsk is even better

                  And here and there the flight time is minutes. That is, in case of an unexpected "blitzkrieg" - and the West loves them - all the boats at the bases will be destroyed - right? The foe has no problems with technology - hypersonic missiles with a nuclear part and there is neither Hajiyev nor Vilyuchinsk

                  At sea - less than 30% is on covert duty - if I am not mistaken there were articles about "combat coefficients" or whatever - but the bottom line is that boats are worth more than sail

                  Is it actually much safer to invest in mine rockets, probably? Either let them go to the BZHRK or Yarsy through the forests - there you have more than 15 minutes of flight time — you can still place everything in the center of the country — and in 15 minutes GDP will have time to give an order for an answer

                  Imagine a situation - an unexpected attack - and the GDP reports - everything that has been destroyed at the borders - the atomarine bases have been demolished - and warheads and the count for minutes have already flown to Engels and the missile bases ...

                  It turns out that in reality the only guarantee for the answer will be ground-based missiles - hidden in the depths of the continent and even bombers from the Kyrgyz Republic - which can always be hidden at airfields

                  And these atomarines are something wrong with this with everything - a big question
                  1. +4
                    25 December 2016 03: 46
                    Quote: Talgat
                    Comrades! I ask you to explain - maybe I don’t understand something

                    Comrade! I will explain .. unexpectedly .. NATO members can go to the pot))), but no kidding, unexpectedly you can only attack with a single launch. A massive blow is needed to destroy the entire infrastructure of the Russian Federation. This is a requirement for 1. BK preparation 2. Concentration of strike forces in positional areas ... Already at this stage, NATO will receive a signal that the Strategic Missile Forces' missiles are "warmed up" and ready to go.
                    So the KSF and Pacific Fleet submarine bases are safe so far in the security of the Russian Federation.
                  2. +1
                    25 December 2016 16: 10
                    Quote: Talgat
                    in case of an unexpected "blitzkrieg" - and the West loves them - all boats at the bases will be destroyed - right? The foe has no problems with technology - hypersonic missiles with a nuclear part and there is neither Hajiyev nor Vilyuchinsk
                    1. Love to stabs in the back and sneak attacks are a distinctive genetic trait of the "civilized West".
                    2. In order to destroy ALL strategists with one blow, you need to use nuclear weapons. All carriers of nuclear weapons are usually tracked. The hardest thing to track, of course, is SSBNs. But they do not come so close to our borders - there is no need: SLBMs are intercontinental. With CRBD - more difficult. But they, too, side by side with us, with the exception of Elk and Virginia, do not climb. They try to stay away if they do not monitor the exit of our units from the bases.
                    3. With NK, everything is easier. When they approach the turn of the task, the fleet forces are transferred to the appropriate degree of battlefield. Ships leave PMB, go to maneuverable bases, etc. So, here, too, the desire to end all rpkSn with one blow does not pass.
                    4. As for the lack of technology problems among the Yankees.
                    Not everything is as smooth as they would like. Otherwise, they, and not we, would have adopted the GZO. We have RCC 3М22 "Zircon" state testing is underway.
                    Product 4202. It has been developed by NPO Mashinostroyeniya since 2009. It is about creating a hypersonic, maneuvering warhead for the heavy Sarmat RS-28 intercontinental ballistic missiles.
                    But something is not heard about the propelled X-51 ...
                    So, we didn’t send all the polymer!
                    Yours faithfully, hi
    2. 0
      24 December 2016 10: 48
      And in the next series, the first laid down cruiser will bear the name "Tsar Boriska".
      1. +3
        24 December 2016 11: 52
        We don’t need this - can’t dive!
        Let them lean on "Ash" now.
      2. +1
        24 December 2016 14: 06
        Quote: killganoff
        And in the next series, the first laid down cruiser will bear the name "Tsar Boriska".

        Suggest more - "Judas Bear"
      3. +3
        24 December 2016 15: 20
        Quote: killganoff
        will bear the name "Tsar Boriska".

        Peter the Great looked into the water, calling the ship "Three Glasses", knew what would be relevant and symbolic. It is a pity that this topic has not received distribution in caronymy. And so, for example, the cruiser Bodun or the destroyer Zapoyny could be in service. Yes
      4. +1
        24 December 2016 16: 45
        Quote: killganoff
        CANCEL

        Well, maybe you ... in the states ...
    3. +1
      24 December 2016 11: 22
      They will leave the old name with an insert between the E and Y of the following characters - X Y. lol
    4. +6
      24 December 2016 12: 12
      EBN is not a "project" of ours and has already successfully thrown back his hooves ...
      Quote: Zibelew
      The next project will be called Borya-E. Or according to NATO classification - "EBN"
      .
    5. 0
      24 December 2016 13: 51
      Quote: Zibelew
      The next project will be called Borya-E. Or according to NATO classification - "EBN

      Well, if by name, then I propose the name of Kikimora. These girls will drown when they are evil, and we need it
      1. +2
        24 December 2016 16: 55
        Or call it Generalissimo Stalin? That was the name, so the name. Simply the best name for us, but for our authorities this name, unfortunately, stands up to the neck.
    6. 0
      24 December 2016 19: 50
      Eighth Borey submarine laid on Sevmash

      good
    7. +2
      24 December 2016 21: 20
      Quote: Zibelew
      The next project will be called Borya-E. Or according to NATO classification - "EBN"

      Borei (dr. Greek Βορέας, Βοῤῥᾶς "northern") - in Greek mythology the personification of the northern stormy wind. He was portrayed as a winged, long-haired, bearded, powerful deity.
      One of the greatest minds of all the Middle Ages, Paracelsus owns the following words: "There is one people that Herodotus calls Hyperboreans. The current name of this people is Muscovy. You cannot trust their terrible decline, which will last for many centuries. In this very country of Hyperboreans, which no one ever thought of as a country in which something great could happen, the Great Cross will shine over the humiliated and rejected ..., Divine Light will shine from the Hyperborean mountain, and all inhabitants of the Earth will see it . "
      In a word, this class of the most advanced combat vehicles received its name by chance and is very symbolic.
  2. 0
    24 December 2016 11: 17
    All is well, but where are the ships ?!
    1. 0
      24 December 2016 11: 50
      True, they are being built very slowly.
    2. +2
      24 December 2016 14: 09
      Quote: East
      All is well, but where are the ships ?!

      At the shipyards, do the old Hottabychs work? He pulled out a hair - the ship is ready.
    3. +1
      24 December 2016 20: 26
      Quote: East
      All is well, but where are the ships ?!

      Are you judging by this article ?? It is only about nuclear submarines.
      In general, for example, 30 ships and vessels have been delivered to the Russian Black Sea Fleet this year, of which 10 are combat ships and boats and 6 diesel-electric submarines "Varshavyanka" with "Calibers" on board.
      Do not be lazy, use a search engine.
  3. 0
    24 December 2016 11: 21
    Quote: killganoff
    And in the next series, the first laid down cruiser will bear the name "Tsar Boriska".

    Rather "Tsar Vladimir" laughing
  4. +2
    24 December 2016 11: 31
    HOORAY! More boats big and different !!!
  5. 0
    24 December 2016 12: 35
    Work Brothers!
  6. +2
    24 December 2016 12: 46
    Quote: masiya
    HOORAY! More boats big and different !!!

    Shouting "Hurray" is the easiest thing. The boat is not a Zhiguli. It will not work to churn it out in dozens. Besides, our economy is not rubber, like factories.
    1. +1
      24 December 2016 19: 05
      Quote: Old26
      The boat is not a Zhiguli. It will not work to churn it out in dozens.

      What can now be called pampering at Sevmash.
      From 1967 to 1972, Sevshash handed over 22 strategic boats pr.667A to the country, 4,4 pieces a year
  7. 0
    24 December 2016 14: 53
    4 pennants for each fleet. And there, the Husky will arrive. Starichkov still probably will not be withdrawn and the resource will be extended for 10 years - this is exactly 40 years of service, which is quite justified.

    25-30 service for expensive ships is an inadmissible luxury. We need a tough approach with the maximum extraction of opportunities from each individual unit of the fleet and so that the ships are at sea, and not stand at the pier or even worse in endless repairs. In general, squeeze out all the useful substances from the ships, so that they would be sent for butchering with a clear conscience and a sense of accomplishment.
    1. 0
      24 December 2016 17: 40
      Roman11, in my opinion, at the headquarters of the Navy tend to heed your recommendation.
  8. +1
    24 December 2016 15: 25
    It would be better to call it "Dmitry Pozharsky" - such a cruiser was in the USSR. Continuity, after all. And in general, there is no monotony with the names of such nuclear submarines - some are called with titles ("Prince Pozharsky"), while others are simply named ("Alexander Nevsky"). "Prince Oleg" - if Prophetic Oleg, then he was not a prince, but Igor Rurikovich was the governor of the prince. If different, which one?
  9. +1
    24 December 2016 15: 39
    Would have done faster and put in the Russian army.
  10. +3
    24 December 2016 15: 50
    I demand the continuation of the series
  11. 0
    24 December 2016 17: 04
    Long live Severodvinsk.
  12. 0
    24 December 2016 17: 35
    Quote: Titsen
    Quote: cniza
    this is the optimal amount to deter adversaries.


    Yes, a little, but enough to hold it.

    And, if, it’s not enough for you, buy a couple of pieces and pass the Navy!

    Well done, good comment. You +
  13. 0
    24 December 2016 17: 47
    under a super rocket mace?
    1. sgg
      0
      25 December 2016 06: 39
      There are no maces, but submarines are laid.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"