Ekranoplanam - to be!

78
Ekranoplanam - to be!The fact that in Washington, in the Gallery of outstanding personalities of the 20th century, is placed a portrait of Rostislav Evgenievich Alekseev, testifies to the recognized Russian priority in ekranoplanostroenie. It is he who holds the palm in creating a new type of vehicle - using the screen effect.

To create an ekranoplan, which could fly over the desert and water, snow and ice, was dreamed of by another well-known aircraft designer and inventor P.I. Grokhovsky. In 1932, he developed a project of a twin-engine amphibian wig. It should be noted that many foreign enthusiastic engineers were also involved in ekranoplans. In Finland it was T. Kaario, in America - D. Warner, in Germany - A. Lippish, in Sweden - I. Troeng. However, the very effect of a dynamic airbag that forms between the wing and the surface was discovered by Igor Ivanovich Sikorsky.



AND PLANE AND SHIP

According to the definition formulated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in the Interim Safety Manual of WIG, it is a multi-mode vessel that, in its main operational mode, flies using the “screen effect” above a water surface or other surface, without constant contact with it, and It is maintained in air mainly by the aerodynamic lifting force generated on the air wing (s), body, or parts thereof, which are intended to use the “screen effect” action. According to the IMO classification, WIGs are classified as seagoing ships.

The effect of the screen itself is due to the fact that the disturbances (increase in pressure) from the wing reach the ground (water), are reflected and have time to reach the wing. In fact, the screen effect is the same airbag, only formed by the injection of air, not by special devices, but by the incoming flow, which leads to a large increase in pressure under the wing. The speed of propagation of the pressure wave is equal to the speed of sound.

The “wing” of such apparatuses creates lift due to the rarefied pressure above the upper plane (as in conventional aircraft) and additionally due to the increased pressure below the lower plane, which is possible only at very small heights (from a few centimeters to several meters). This height is commensurate with the length of the average aerodynamic chord (MAR) of the wing.

The larger the wing's MAR, the lower the flight speed and altitude, the higher the screen effect.

As the domestic operating experience of WIG showed, they combine the best qualities of a ship and a plane. Ekranoplans can be operated in various physiographic conditions, including those that are not available to ordinary ships. Along with higher hydroaerodynamic quality and seaworthiness, than other high-speed vessels, WIG always have amphibious properties. In addition to the water surface, they are able to move over a solid surface (earth, snow, ice) and be based on it. Wing ekranoplana special design, capable of a long time to break away from the screen and go into the "airplane" flight mode, called echo-flying.

SCREEN EFFECT

For all ekranoplanes, the main mode of operation is flying in close proximity to the surface using the "screen effect". Given that the operating conditions of ekranoplanes are close to the operating conditions of ships, a joint decision of the IMO and the International Civil Organization aviation (ICAO) The ekranoplane is not considered as an aircraft that can sail, but as a ship capable of flying. In this case, the operation of ekranoplanes is regulated mainly by the "International Rules for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea".

Since WIGs have the ability to increase the flight altitude beyond the limits of the “screen effect” action, as well as fly at altitudes where aviation rules apply, in order to divide the sphere of jurisdiction of IMO and ICAO, all WIGs have the ability and availability of permission to operate beyond the height of the action Screen Effects are divided into three types in the Guide:

- Type A is a vessel that is certified to operate only within the “screen effect” area of ​​coverage. Such vessels in all modes of operation are subject to the requirements of IMO;

- Type B - a vessel that is certified for a short time and by a limited amount to increase the flight altitude beyond the limits of the “screen effect” action, but at a distance from the surface not exceeding 150 m (for flying through another vessel, obstacle or other purposes). Also subject to the requirements of IMO. The maximum height of such a “flight” must be less than the minimum safe flight altitude of the aircraft in accordance with ICAO requirements (above the sea - 150 m). The height restriction in 150 M is controlled by ICAO;

- Type C is a vessel certified for operation outside the “screen effect” area of ​​operation at a height exceeding 150 m. Subject to IMO requirements in all modes of operation, except for “aircraft”. In the "airplane" mode, security is ensured only by ICAO requirements, taking into account the special features of an EKV.

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

All ekranoplans have a number of undeniable advantages:

high survivability: modern EK is much safer than conventional aircraft, as in the case of a malfunction in flight, the amphibian can take the water even with strong agitation. Moreover, this does not require any pre-landing maneuvers and can be carried out simply by discharge of gas (for example, in the event of engine failure). Also, the engine malfunction itself is often not so dangerous for large WIG due to the fact that they have several engines divided into starting and sustainer groups, and the failure of the engine of the sustainer group can be compensated by starting one of the starting group engines;

high enough speed - from 200 to 600 km / h and more - WIG on speed, combat and lifting characteristics surpass hovercraft, hydrofoil vessels;

WIGs have high profitability and higher payload compared to airplanes and helicopters, since the lifting force is added to the force generated from the screen effect;

for military use, the low visibility of ground-effect vehicle on radar due to a flight at a height of several meters, high speed, low threat of anti-ship mines are important;

for ekranoplans, the type of surface that creates a screen effect is not important - they can move over a frozen water surface, a snowy plain, over bad roads, etc .; as a result, they can move along “direct” routes, they do not need ground infrastructure: bridges, roads, etc .;
EKR aircraft belong to non-aerodrome aviation - for take-off and landing they need not a specially prepared runway, but only a sufficiently large water area or a flat piece of land.

However, ekranoplans, as well as all technical devices, are inherent and disadvantages.

This is, first of all, insufficient maneuverability, the impossibility of flying over an uneven surface (this deficiency is devoid of a screen fly). The control of ekranoplan is more complicated than that of an ordinary aircraft, which requires special training and specific pilot skills. In addition, the start procedure requires additional starting engines or special starting modes for main engines, which leads to additional fuel consumption.

Russian scientists, designers and testers have been engaged in theoretical development, design, creation and operation of ekranoplanes for more than 70 years.

Among the developments of the Soviet era ekranoplans, two dominant groups can be distinguished:

the designs of the Central Design Bureau for hydrofoil vessels (Central Design Bureau for SEC) under the leadership of Rostislav Alekseev;
designs by Robert Bartini in the Aviation Design Bureau named. Gm Beriev in Taganrog (1968 – 1974).
Works of TsKB Rostislav Alekseev

In 1941, Rostislav Alekseev defended his thesis “Hydrofoil Glider”, and in 1951, he was awarded the Stalin Prize for developing and creating hydrofoil vessels. From the idea of ​​hydrofoil vessels, Alekseev advanced closely to the development of a vehicle capable of navigating water at speeds far exceeding the speeds of ordinary ships.

At the beginning of the 60-ies in the Central Design Bureau for hydrofoil vessels (CDB for SEC) in the laboratory conducted a study of the screen effect on small towed models and self-propelled manned vehicles.

A screened research and experimental base was required for work on the screen, and a special testing station (base) EC-2 with a complex of unique structures was built at the Gorky Reservoir, many were specially created to study the features of the screen effect.

22 July 1961 of the year at the EC-2 test station was performed the first flight of the first domestic ground-effect vehicle (EK) SM-1. In the first test flight, the CM-1 was piloted by the chief designer himself and the head of the Central Design Bureau for SEC R.E. Alekseev. By the fall of 1961, the ground-winged vehicle was mastered to a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the vehicle. Alekseev invited the Deputy Chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers, the Chairman of the Commission of the Presidium of the USSR Council of Ministers on Military-Industrial Issues D. F. Ustinov, the Chairman of the State Committee for Civil Engineering B.Ye. Butomu and the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy S.G. Gorshkov on demonstration flights SM-1.

The demonstration turned out to be so convincing that the distinguished guests expressed a desire to ride an ekranoplane, under the personal responsibility of R.Ye. Alekseeva.

At the suggestion of D.F. Ustinova, at the beginning of May 1962, a demonstration of the SM-2 N.S. Khrushchev and other members of the government, which was held at the Khimki Reservoir near Moscow. The successful demonstration of the SM-2 influenced the adoption of the state program, including the development of new ekranoplans, the creation of combat ekranoplans for the Navy and other types of troops.

The flight test service (LIS) was organized in the structure of the Central Clinical Hospital for SEC. In 1962 – 1965, the design and creation of a unique, largest at that time in the world of aircraft - KM, which received the name “Caspian Monster” from the Americans, was carried out. The chief designer of a wig was R.E. Alekseev, the leading designer - V.P. Yefimov. The ekranoplan had a wingspan of 37,6 m, a length of about 100 m, take-off weight of 544 tons. This was a record for any existing aircraft.

In 1972, the first really working military ekranot "Orlyonok" was built, intended for the transfer of amphibious assault forces to a range of up to 1500 km. Tests of this ekranolet conducted naval pilot fleet V.G. Yarmosh. In total, in the period 1977-1983, five eagle-type ekranolets were built: “Double” for static tests, S-23, S-21, S-25, S-26. All of them became part of the naval aviation, and on their basis the 11th separate air group was formed.

The state program envisaged the construction of an Eaglet-type EKROTOL X-ZOOM before 24. The shipbuilding plants in Nizhny Novgorod and Theodosia were to carry out serial assembly. However, these plans were not destined to be realized. After his departure in the year 1984, Minister of Defense of the USSR Dmitry Ustinov, who oversaw high-tech weapons, all work on the production and development of this promising apparatus was curtailed. Before the 2007, the four made copies of the Orlenka were in varying degrees of misunderstanding at the Navy base in the city of Kaspiysk. In June 2007, the best-preserved specimen was towed down the Volga to Moscow and installed in a museum on the Khimki reservoir.

In 1987, the first flight was made by an Lun air launch vehicle. He was armed with six Mosquito guided anti-ship missiles. After the successful completion of state tests, Lun was transferred to 1990 for trial operation. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to the cessation of work in this area.

The well-known aircraft designer R.L. also made a great contribution to the popularization of the ekranoplan idea, the development of circuit solutions and experimental studies of models in wind tunnels. Bartini, who worked aggressively and fruitfully in this direction in the 70-s. At this time, the project R.L. Bartini was built and tested anti-amphibious aircraft BBA-1.

SCREEN PLANS IN NEW RUSSIA

Work on the creation of ekranoplans in post-Soviet Russia continued mainly by small private enterprises and for a long time without the dominant support of the state. The practical implementation of various projects was limited to the construction of mostly single or small series of light samples, with a take-off weight of up to 10 t, WIG. They hold 10 – 30 people, have a maximum speed of about 200 km / h and a range of up to 1500 km. Among them - "Aquaglide" and "Orion" several modifications, "Petrel-24", "Volga-2", "Oriole" EK-12.

The Sky Plus Sea design bureau at the technical center, led by pilot-cosmonaut Yuri Viktorovich Romanenko, created the Burevestnik-24 X-screen X-screen satellite with a payload of 24, which was tested in Yakutia.

Orion Ekranoplanostroitelny Association has developed a model of Orion 12 ekranoplan, and several vessels have already been ordered by foreign partners.

At present, all-weather factory tests of an Orion-14 ground-effect vehicle in various conditions are underway. Originally created as a patrol ekranoplan for law enforcement agencies, the Orion-14 is also regarded as a vehicle for civilian use. In Orion-14, in contrast to Orion-12, the engine transmission was changed, their cooling system was improved, new propellers were installed, the small engine of a boat-type, as well as a number of other improvements were made. In the design of "Orion 14" used composite materials of a new generation. As part of the onboard equipment "Orion-14" increased the share of domestic components. "Orion-14" can work in the winter, its tests in an ice situation with hummocks up to 50 cm, and also on an ice sludge are planned. According to the results of tests of a ground-effect vehicle (WIG), the question of the possibility of its use in remote areas of the Far North and the Far East is considered.

In addition, within the framework of the Federal Target Program “Development of Civilian Marine Engineering” at 2009 – 2016, the Orion-20 ground-effect vehicle was developed. The length of the vehicle is about 19,128 m, the width is about 20 m, the draft at full load is no more than 0,7 m, the maximum take-off weight is 10 t. The crew consists of two people. An ekranoplan is capable of carrying an 21 passenger at speeds of 220 – 250 km / h in airplane mode and in airplane mode to a distance of up to 1600 km. "Orion-20" can be used to provide emergency medical care, for the transfer of emergency services, search and survey parties, for patrol services and other tasks of law enforcement agencies.

Russian regions are expressing serious interest in passenger ekranoplans. These are the coastal and northern regions: Primorsky Krai, Karelia, Yakutia, Arkhangelsk Oblast, Kamchatka Krai, Nenets Autonomous Okrug. The need to use WIG in these regions is determined by the fact that WIG is a vessel of year-round navigation. He can pass where no traditional craft can pass. On ice and snow, it moves like a snowmobile, in shallow water, at the request of the pilot, the ground-wing vehicle can fly up to 5 m. At the same time, its speed is comparable to the speed of aircraft for local airlines - up to 250 km / h.

Taking into account the needs of the coastal and northern Russian regions in passenger ekranoplans, as well as the needs of the global market, the state has increased the attention and measures of state support for the development of ekranoplanostroeniya. Work on the creation of a new generation of ekranoplans for the domestic and global market was included in the federal target program “Development of civilian marine equipment” for 2009 – 2016 years. Within the framework of the program, in particular, a project of high-speed ground effect vehicle based on composites was developed, and a lightweight ground effect vehicle Sterkh-10 was built and tested. In TsKB SEC them. R.E. Alekseev is working on the creation of two heavy passenger W-rotor A-050 and A-080 with take-off weight 54 and 100 t, cruising speed 350 – 450 km / h.

Outside the program, as an initiative, various organizations continue to carry out theoretical studies, develop concepts and projects of various vehicles, including, for example, a Be-2500 screening vehicle with a take-off weight of 2500 and payload of up to 1000.

FOREIGN APPROACH

Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, work on ekranoplana subjects abroad has noticeably revived, today they are carried out by more than 10 highly developed countries, including China, the United States, South Korea, Germany, Canada, Iran, New Zealand, Australia, Singapore. Substantial state support is provided to these works in China, South Korea, Iran, Germany, and Singapore.

To date, more than 50 experimental as well as practical ekranoplan models have been built abroad. The creators of these ekranoplans are both individual researchers and well-known research centers and companies in several countries around the world.

In general, light ekranoplanes are currently being built abroad, but there is a clear tendency for their size and carrying capacity to grow.

In the United States, at the beginning of the 1990, specialists, having studied the experience of the USSR, came to the conclusion that the United States was significantly behind in the field of the development of ekranoplanes. The US Congress created a special commission to develop a concept and recommendations for the development of ekranoplans. In the future, the Boeing company developed the concept of an Ekranolit (the Pelikan project) for strategic redeployment of military contingents and military equipment to places of conflict. The project of the American EKR ensemble included the length of 152 m and wingspan of 106 m. When moving at an altitude of 6 m above the ocean (having the ability to rise to an altitude of 6000 m), the Pelican was supposed to carry up to 1400 tons of cargo over a distance of more than 12 thousand km.

In China, according to media reports, the most intensive work is being carried out with state support. So, back in 1995, a government order created the WV Development Center. Large scientific and scientific-technical centers and private companies in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Nanking are involved in the development of ekranoplanes. The production of ekranoplans is organized at aircraft and shipbuilding plants in the cities of Changzhou, Jingmen, Shanghai, etc. The plant for the production of ekranoplanes is built on the Chinese island of Hainan.

Private capital also takes an active part in the development of ekranoplanes. Thus, the joint-stock company "Guangzhou Tianxiang Ekranoplan Company Limited" with a statutory fund of 100 million dollars has declared its future leadership in the global ekranoplan market as one of its main goals. China, relying in many respects on the basic Russian developments, plans to build in the coming years a significant number of ground-based vehicle systems, including dual-use ones. At the enterprises, pilot production of devices with a carrying capacity from 10 to 200 t is organized, and in the future, after 2017, it is planned to build more than 200 ekranoplans. Such vessels will become an indispensable tool for high-speed passenger and cargo traffic between the islands of Southeast Asia. In general, according to experts, the needs of the People's Republic of China can be more than 1000 WIG for various purposes.

In the Republic of Korea, under the German license is built for commercial operation 50-local ekranoplan WSH-500. The government of the country plans to invest about 100 million dollars in the creation of a commercial-purpose ground-surface vehicle (2019 t and speed 100 – 250 km / h) by 300 year.

Iran, in contrast to other countries, focused on the production of ekranoplanes for military purposes. In 2010, its armed forces received the first three squadrons of Bavar-2 single-seat vehicles. Iranian ekranoplan equipped with a machine gun, night vision device, as well as equipment for reconnaissance. On board an ekranoplan it is possible to send on-line images of the terrain and other intelligence data to the Navy headquarters.

As the experience of domestic and foreign ekranoplanostroeniya shows, the ekranoplans have great prospects in the field of passenger and freight traffic, both international and domestic needs. The international "routes" of WIG will be many times shorter than the rail, road or sea routes used today.

EKV projects have been developed for passenger transportation over the Arctic waters and ice. This will allow shipping in the northern ports all year round, regardless of the season. In the future, the capabilities of WIG can be widely used for the transport of goods and members of scientific expeditions in the Arctic and Antarctic.

Ekranoplans have great prospects for use in military and other purposes of law enforcement agencies, including for the transfer of troops and military equipment in crisis areas, in the fight against smuggling and poaching while protecting coastal fish areas by the forces of the maritime border guard. Experts also seriously assess the importance of using WIG in the fight against piracy on transport routes.

Thus, it can be stated that to date, there has been a scientific and technical background for domestic development of WIG, individual samples of WIG various modifications and assignments have been built and tested, and the operating experience necessary for the serial construction of WIG has been accumulated.

Studies conducted by specialized institutes show that the expected high performance of WIG, determining their profitability, meets the modern requirements of potential customers and trends in the development of transport systems, therefore, commercial WIG can be a reality in the near future.

Given the vast experience in the design and creation of a series of ekranoplans, Russia can and should become the world leader in their production. The scientific and technical potential of Russia allows you to build these aircraft in large quantities, including for sale abroad. However, in order to develop an ekranoplanostroenie in equal conditions with foreign competitors, it is necessary to finance these works to the necessary extent using the state order. Otherwise, Russia may lose priority on these unique aircraft and technology.

In general, it is expected that in the near and medium term there will be a breakthrough in the field of ekranoplanostroeniya. It is very likely that these vehicles will become an important part of the global transport system, and in the armed forces of a number of states, primarily in Southeast Asia, regular units equipped with ekranoplans may appear.

With the sponsorship of Rosoboronexport JSC and the assistance of Concern EKR Almaz-Antey AO, Etnik’s studio has released the circulation of the first volume of Almanac Armament of Aerospace Forces of Russia - Modern Technology EKR and EW of Russia. The almanac discusses the main types of anti-aircraft missile systems and complexes, radar tools, electronic warfare, targets and auxiliary equipment. It also contains information on enterprises of the Russian defense industry that develop and produce modern EKR and EW facilities, radio-electronic systems, etc. The volume of the publication is 560 pages in Russian and English, more than 2000 photos.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    24 December 2016 16: 01
    The couch debatants seemed too lazy to look for information about the global interest in ekranoplans and quite amicably hated the very idea of ​​such ships. It turns out that there are quite a few progressive-minded people in the world who appreciated the prospects of work in this direction. And it pleases.
    1. +13
      24 December 2016 16: 15
      well, when they get it, then ours will remember that something happened too, they will start to groan and gasp, a race will begin, catch up and overtake. History teaches that no one learns from history.
      1. +4
        24 December 2016 16: 34
        Why should we catch up? We have "Lun" not only in metal, but also flying.
        1. +3
          24 December 2016 16: 49
          Ekranoplanam - to be!
          this is already heard ... and where? Let’s do it ... not words.
          1. +6
            24 December 2016 16: 56
            Andrei Yurievich, just don’t tell me that newsreels are Japanese animation ...
            1. +4
              24 December 2016 19: 00
              if you could see this ekranoplan now in the bay of the Dagdiesel plant of the city of Kaspiysk (all the colors are plundered, etc.
              1. +5
                24 December 2016 19: 24
                Ekranoplan "Lun" project 903
                LTH:
                Modification Lun
                Wingspan, m 44.00
                Length, m 73.80
                Height, m ​​19.20
                Wing area, m2 550.00
                Weight, kg
                empty 243000 aircraft
                maximum take-off 380000
                Engine type 8 TRD NK-87
                Thrust, kgf 8 x 13000
                The maximum speed, km / h 500
                Practical range, km 2000
                Flight height on the screen, m 1-5
                Seaworthiness, points 5-6
                Crew 10
                Armament: 6 PU PKR ZM-80 Mosquito
            2. +1
              24 December 2016 20: 03
              Andrei Yuryevich has a colleague Oleg Kaptsov, proving that this is a useless pile of metal not worth the effort and kerosene spent on its creation.
              1. +7
                25 December 2016 05: 36
                Useless, strike armament six missiles ... alloooo! Neither air defense nor ART installations, it is extremely unmaneuverable at speed, huge fuel consumption, simply fantastic, maintenance and maintenance in the battleground do not worry, besides, they need a separate infrastructure, and all for what? In order to have a small chance of getting one cr on an aircraft carrier? Listen "Baton" will cope with this task much better, right at times !!!!
            3. +5
              24 December 2016 20: 30
              I saw this whopper in Kaspiysk in '89, I was still a kid. The base itself was practically in the center of the city (along the coast), and the beach was not far away, we swam there and suddenly the crash of the wild and this crap comes out slowly — the impression is the strongest. Slightly went out to sea, then as it blows - and went beyond the horizon. I had Zenith with me, several times I clicked, but for some reason it didn’t work out a single frame. Three years before, there Orlyonok saw, but only from afar.
              Then I did not know what it was, only a few years later I read about the "Caspian Monster" in UT.
            4. +1
              25 December 2016 05: 37
              These are just test frames!
          2. +1
            24 December 2016 16: 58
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            Andrey Yuryevich


            IMHO, the car is good, necessary, we have already tested, but quite expensive. And you can't grab hold of "pussy and sissy" with one hand, there are many other equally important tasks for the state. So it is possible, then, when conditions and finances allow .... Yes
        2. +1
          25 December 2016 05: 30
          Not only in metal, but also flying ..? What is this phrase ... actually "in metal" in this expression does not mean a draft design, and not a development ... but an already operating device ..))))
        3. 0
          3 February 2017 23: 22
          Yeah! Take off and somersault. Take an interest in the problems of keeping the ekranoplan in such a flight.
          1. 0
            7 November 2017 12: 45
            And what, there was such a problem? Screen: it is a screen in Africa too - you won’t take off above, you won’t fall below, this is the basic concept of an ekranoplan.
            1. 0
              7 November 2017 15: 01
              Explore the topic deeper and then we'll talk.
    2. +6
      24 December 2016 18: 35
      Ekranoplanam - to be!

      Probably not. In the current environment, the balance of weaknesses / merits is not in favor of this project.
      Outdated, like many American and NATO developments of alternative military equipment.
    3. +6
      24 December 2016 20: 52
      But people on the one hand blame the American F-35 for the high cost and desire to make a universal aircraft, such as Americans are stupid.
      And on the other hand, they cry that the ekranoplan project was not completed, although in comparable prices these projects are almost the same.
      It is good that the Communists were nevertheless smarter (although they did not swell too much) and stopped this bacchanalia of wasting money on a non-viable project.
      1. 0
        3 February 2017 23: 25
        One must be an idiot in order not to understand that for an effective flight the so-called. ekranoplan need so-called “cold” turbines, which would control the elastic air flow onto which this aircraft lands. But they are not and are not expected!
        1. 0
          7 November 2017 12: 48
          Don’t forget the name; For the Rockets, Meteors, Sunrises, were they also necessary?
    4. 0
      30 December 2016 13: 37
      As hinted very accurately, it took 15 years from the first practically applicable structures to mass production. Aircraft taking off in the 1904, after 10 years, was available in hundreds of copies in any decent army, and by the end of the WWII designated the emergence of the Air Force as an independent kind of troops. How many more years does the ekranoplanes need to move from half-garage crafts that are not needed to anyone, which they try to pass off as a breakthrough and monsters at the price of the Tu-160 are only several times more dangerous for their own crew, and with insignificant combat and transport capabilities?

      The correct answer is that this will never happen, and this is already evident from the fact that planes, helicopters, and ships are built to operate in strictly defined environments at certain optimal modes for the vast majority of the time. But the ekranoplan neither flies properly nor swims, and in principle does not use such key factors as the natural buoyancy force of water, or rarefaction of air at high altitudes with the absence of any objects for collision there.
      1. 0
        3 February 2017 23: 29
        Lack of understanding of what the propulsion device should be and separates planes from helicopters and from everything that seeks to take off and fly
      2. 0
        7 November 2017 12: 49
        Teach a materiel, a student - do not give out your fantasies as facts!
        1. 0
          7 November 2017 15: 14
          When Elon Musk started his Tesla project, I talked about the fact that the lack of fundamental ideas and their solutions in creating both the engine and power sources will lead the entire project to failure. Any project in the field of creating aircraft or surface or underwater and spacecraft will remain at the same quality level unless you change the principles of the propulsion. Therefore, boorish antics determine only your face. . The reality is obvious.
  2. +3
    24 December 2016 16: 06
    Interesting article, thanks
  3. +2
    24 December 2016 16: 31
    WIG Builders - Go! Morning nose all!
  4. +2
    24 December 2016 16: 37
    In our (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug) swamps it would be better to drive on it than on a helicopter. Unfortunately, fuel consumption comparisons are not indicated.
    1. +2
      24 December 2016 17: 10
      buy an aero boat and drive in winter and summer
    2. 0
      24 December 2016 21: 37
      In the swamps you need to drive on such an all-terrain vehicle
    3. 0
      7 November 2017 12: 51
      In terms of fuel consumption per unit mass, it is less than an airplane, but more than a ship
  5. +1
    24 December 2016 17: 02
    Give Caspian Monsters, pieces 5-6 drinks
    1. +5
      25 December 2016 05: 38
      Why, there, let’s be 40, by the twentieth year, and then Putin will not give us anything to live on, you are to blame ..)))!
      1. 0
        25 December 2016 09: 56
        Those who want to live well will find ways to make money.As for the construction and production of heavy ekranoplanes, seaplanes - ekranolyot, it’s quite a costly business to take the same Be 2500, according to conservative estimates, its production will cost 300 billion rubles.
    2. +1
      6 May 2018 18: 46
      The Caspian monster is actually a Ship Model. It took 30 tons of kerosene to exit the screen. This is just for starters ... Of course, progress does not stand still, but the power plant / s should be there wow! He knows where to get the hack. It's all expensive ...
  6. +6
    24 December 2016 17: 35
    I once studied in Novosibirsk as a scientist for the defense industry and radical approaches to solving problems were popular there, but I am very skeptical of the ekranoteli that we have built so far.
    Yes, the dimensions are impressive, but ... Too rude! Efficiency is too poor. Very imperfect management.
    In my opinion, they are in a hurry. We still need a whole series of experimental machines with all kinds of new experimental solutions in the field of vehicle controllability and take-off and landing. Those that came from aviation of the 1940s (did not use anything new!) Are not so much enough to solve problems using ekranoplanes - others more developed modes of transport are still competing. I believe that we need a completely new system of stabilization and control of the device, similar to those used on the su-27 and its descendants. Without this step, normal ekranoplanes will be no more than 3-4 meters in size.

    So far, the level of technology that exists allows efficiently making only extremely highly specialized machines, such as the Bartini apparatus, where the features of the apparatus are justified by the conditions of use.
    1. +1
      24 December 2016 17: 41
      about marine missile carriers. It is much easier to build a hydrofoil ship. Yes, it will be a little slower, but much easier and more reliable. And the speed can be provided in the region of 150-200 km / h.
      a century ago, ships were already being built at a speed of about 100 mph.
      1. +2
        24 December 2016 19: 22
        If my memory serves me well, hydrofoil vessels have limited seaworthiness, which is why they were abandoned. And here in the future they want to get shock and transport ships with good speed and carrying capacity.
        1. 0
          24 December 2016 19: 25
          A century ago, they built gliders at a speed of 100km per hour
      2. 0
        25 December 2016 07: 31
        In 1916 there were ships at a speed of 100 km per hour ..)))? Enlighten, please ..))!
    2. Net
      +2
      24 December 2016 20: 30
      It is radically necessary to change the body and approach. Not ship, because of which the efficiency is low and not airplane. In the future, there should be a hydrofoil flying wing at the time of launch.
      1. 0
        7 November 2017 12: 53
        And the synchrophasotron engine, no less!
    3. +2
      25 December 2016 05: 39
      Studied as a scientist for the defense ..? Strongly of course said ..))!
  7. 0
    24 December 2016 19: 19
    In vain our shared with ami, it was necessary to keep a secret.
    1. +4
      24 December 2016 21: 09
      These are sub-council Yeltsinoids for money, "a tour-show with a detailed photo session" in Kaspiysk organized for their "friends" - advisers ... at the base they were only perplexed by such criminal openness (at least ten years of time and several lard raccoons saved for "partners") - more in the magazines "Inventor and Rationalizer" and "Aerohobby" 92-94 years. And in "Wings of the Motherland", "Technology-Youth" also wrote about ekranoplans in those years, the secrecy was just removed.
      At the same time, the T-80 with the Tunguska was also "shipped" to the Aberdeen test site - Colonel Viktor Baranets, the military observer of the "Komsomolskaya Pravda", told about this in hot pursuit.
  8. +1
    24 December 2016 19: 25
    The restless sect of ekranophiles
    According to the totality of indicators LOAD × SPEED × DELIVERY COST × SAFETY × HIPS WIGs have no advantages over existing vehicles. On the contrary, they lose in absolutely all respects to conventional aircraft. Surpassing ships in speed, ekranoplanes are inferior to them by 1000 times in terms of carrying capacity and at least 10-15 times in cruising range. Therefore, they are not even able to partially take on the tasks of maritime transport.

    https://topwar.ru/90960-bespoleznost-ekranoplanov
    .html
    1. +1
      24 December 2016 20: 47
      But does anyone claim that this is a great replacement for ships or planes? This is a completely different type of transport, which combines at the same time the properties of aircraft and watercraft - of course, not all but, proceeding from these hybrid properties, the scope of the ekranoplan is determined.
      ps Indicate the plane, with a payload and economy at least approaching KM ...?
      1. 0
        24 December 2016 21: 14
        Quote: kaban7
        Specify the plane, carrying capacity and efficiency at least approaching the CM ...?

        What is the load capacity of the CM?

        KM - max. takeoff weight 544 tons
        Empty weight - 240 tons
        The rest is cargo and fuel
        How much load?
        1. +1
          25 December 2016 07: 35
          Oleg, once a week you need to throw off your article "An ekranoplan is needed like a dead man Kalosha". For prevention.
      2. 0
        25 December 2016 07: 20
        Any helicopter aircraft is superior in terms of carrying capacity, range, speed, cross-country ekranoplan of equal mass or equal engine power.
      3. 0
        30 December 2016 01: 34
        Well, for a start, find out the carrying capacity, the maximum range under different loads and the efficiency of ekranoplanes. And as you learn, then all the questions you have will disappear about the "miracle machines".

        But this is not the main thing. WIG is very dangerous in piloting things. I went too far with a roll to the wing at the turn, scooped up water and that’s all - your ekranoplan fell apart at 500 km / h. So KM by the way fell apart. It is impossible to drive safely 5 meters above the sea at a speed of 300-500 km / h and still try to maneuver it on an airplane.
  9. +3
    24 December 2016 19: 40
    Alekseev in the United States is remembered as the creator of very successful PDAs, and there is no need to add to his great work his mistake, ekranoplans.
    Ekranoplanophiles, show at least one production winged aircraft adopted after 2005. They are not here. Neither in China, which needs to fight the US Navy, nor in India, where they think how to stop the dragon. Or do you think people are sitting there dumber than you?
    1. Net
      +4
      24 December 2016 20: 25
      Iranian three squadrons of Bavar-2, Chinese CYG-11, TXV-4. The Chinese are still rolling in civilian options and the military are not shining.
      1. 0
        25 December 2016 18: 22
        Quote: Net
        Iranian three squadrons of Bavar-2, Chinese CYG-11, TXV-4. The Chinese are still rolling in civilian options and the military are not shining.

        Already roared in a voice. Especially from Iranian combat ekranoplanes. And in China, these are not military vehicles.
        And this, when China does something good, it always has "accidental" leaks.
  10. +1
    24 December 2016 20: 32
    Quote: GSH-18
    Ekranoplanam - to be!

    Probably not. In the current environment, the balance of weaknesses / merits is not in favor of this project.
    Outdated, like many American and NATO developments of alternative military equipment.

    Outdated morally, or physically? Where does such reliable information come from?
    1. +2
      24 December 2016 21: 15
      limited maneuver and almost rectilinear movement ... good target ... predictable ...
  11. +1
    24 December 2016 20: 50
    Quote: BNVSurgut
    In our (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug) swamps it would be better to drive on it than on a helicopter. Unfortunately, fuel consumption comparisons are not indicated.

    In terms of consumption (specific, of course), it is much more economical than an airplane, what can we say about a helicopter.
  12. +6
    24 December 2016 22: 26
    Quote: kaban7
    In terms of consumption (specific, of course), it is much more economical than an airplane, what can we say about a helicopter.

    I did not want to get involved in this debate once again, but ....
    If you want to argue that it is more economical than the plane - give the parameters of the EA and the plane. I once compared the Lun with both the TU-22M2 and the TU-160 in this topic (each time there was someone who offered them as an alternative.
    Refueling TU-160 - about 70-75 tons of fuel, on which it flies about 12000 km. Refueling "moon" about 110 tons. Operating range with such a filling TWO THOUSAND KILOMETERS... Armament "Lunya" - 6 missiles with a range of 120 km. Its speed is about 500 km. I think you will find the combat load of the TU-160 yourself. And after that you continue to assert that products with a refueling 40 tons more than an aircraft and having a range of 2000 km versus 12000 are more economical than an aircraft ???? Oh well
    1. +3
      25 December 2016 07: 27
      People want to believe in miracle weapons, magic wands and freebies. It will always be like that, and they make money on it, spreading suckers or coming to power request
    2. 0
      26 December 2016 14: 36
      Rockets? "Mosquito", for surface purposes, it is not worth it.

      Tu-160 is a carrier of long-range cruise missiles with nuclear warheads intended for striking at area targets.
    3. 0
      7 November 2017 13: 02
      https://militaryarms.ru/voennaya-texnika/aviaciya
      / lun /
  13. +2
    25 December 2016 02: 07
    Ekranoplanam - to be!

    As a search and rescue tool - why not. An ekranoplan can quickly reach an area where it is necessary to remove a crew from a ship or ship in distress, it can lift people right out of the water, and its carrying capacity is greater than that of an amphibious aircraft. In the rest of the "role", the ekranoplan is unlikely to have an advantage over an aircraft or a hovercraft.
    1. +2
      25 December 2016 07: 31
      The range is limited, the possibility of detection is negligible, you can not get into the storm. Wing niche - funny pokatushki tourists
    2. +2
      25 December 2016 07: 37
      In the calm .. the ships rarely end up in distress ..)))! A wave of one and a half to two meters, and your screen monster is securely tied to the base, or to the sea base, or whatever it was for him to build on sickly billions of rubles ...))) ?
      1. +1
        25 December 2016 10: 00
        It’s better to create superheavy seaplanes, and ekranoplanes are in fact an experimental specific technique.
      2. 0
        7 November 2017 13: 03
        seaworthiness 5-6 points! https://militaryarms.ru/voennaya-texnika/aviaciya
        / lun /
        1. 0
          16 November 2017 23: 12
          Take the trouble to read the main flaws in your article:
          - huge turning radius.
          - the need to fly at a height of no more than 15m.
          - the impossibility of flying over an uneven surface.
          - very poor maneuverability, i.e. it is impossible to quickly respond to an obstacle and turn off like on an airplane.

          It follows that the ekranoplanes cannot "walk" along the rivers - the turning radius is too large and there is no maneuverability.
          It follows that flying over the waves of 3-5 meters is a suicide.
          It follows that flying in a strong wind is suicide.
          It follows that flying above the ground is suicide.
  14. +1
    25 December 2016 11: 40
    All these wunderwaffles are expensive, their operation is expensive and dangerous for the crew, and the combat effectiveness is very controversial, because they have neither air defense systems nor anti-aircraft defense assets .... Such projects are well suited for money laundering, but it’s better to defend Russia's coast universal missile corvettes 20380,20385,20386 are suitable .... Which will cost less both in construction and operation and are not as dangerous for the crew during service as any hybrid aircraft and missile boats.
  15. 0
    26 December 2016 10: 44
    Ground needs to be built and tested, the future of aviation.
    1. 0
      30 December 2016 02: 09
      So I imagined it - a 300-ton fully loaded monster flies to itself with 150 tons of aviation kerosene at an altitude of 000-3 meters above the ground. The slightest careless movement, unsuccessful roll when turning, diving, some kind of obstacle (10-3 meters of total height) and all these 10 tons of kerosene turn into a fiery tornado on the ground, capturing everything around in its mouth.
  16. +1
    26 December 2016 14: 26
    Personally, I am satisfied with boats with Caliber in the Caspian, everything else is toys for the military. The purpose of the ekranoplanes is clear, only for what they are needed ... There is no normal aircraft carrier, it’s time for long-range aircraft to somehow modernize or develop something modern based on them. The production of civil aviation aircraft was completely killed. They forgot about reusable space shuttles, or rather, ruined the industry.
    And finally: who will cover this miracle bird? Why fly at such speed over water?
  17. 0
    26 December 2016 14: 43
    And one more thing: "the ekranoplan is designed to combat surface ships by inflicting a missile strike in conditions of weak opposition from the enemy's air attack means. The main target of the missile carrier is aircraft carriers."
    CLASS! Let's have no illusions.
  18. +1
    28 December 2016 05: 06
    Quote: Tlauicol
    The range is limited, the possibility of detection is negligible, you can not get into the storm. Wing niche - funny pokatushki tourists

    1 - Range, the ability to detect, the ability to land in a storm - these are all purely technical problems. They are completely solvable. Nevertheless, we live in the 21st century.

    NPK "TREK" also carries out design work on ekranoplanes of a larger standard size. In particular, the design of the EK-100 ekranoplan of the "river-sea" class has begun on the order of an unannounced customer. According to preliminary calculations, the EK-100 has a launch weight of 32 tons with a payload mass of up to 11 tons. It is designed to carry up to 106 passengers with a three-member crew. The power plant of the EK-100 ekranoplan consists of two TV7-117S turbofan engines with a capacity of 3000 hp. Flight speed: cruising / maximum - 320/410 km / h. The flight range will be 3200 km. The specific fuel consumption of the ekranoplan will be 0,078 kg / t.km, while a similar indicator for aircraft of this class is 0,4-0,7 kg / t.km.

    In addition, preliminary studies and design work on the EK-150 ekranoplane at an early stage are also underway from abroad. EK-150 has starting weight 355 t with a payload weight of up to 150 t. It is designed to carry up to 1290 passengers with a crew of 3-5 people. The powerplant of the ekranoplan EK-150 consists of six TDD PS-90A with a thrust of 16 tons each. Flight speed: cruising / maximum - 600/700 km / h. each. Flight range will be 6000 km. The specific fuel consumption of the ekranoplan will be 0,056 kg / tkm, with a similar indicator for aircraft of this class 0,35-0,6 kg / tkm.


    Information from here: http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/40313

    Quote: igorka357
    In calm .. the courts rarely endure distress ..)))!

    2 - In peacetime - yes. In the military - not always. Well, let's not forget about submarines. They may be in distress both in calm and in storms with equal probability.
    1. 0
      30 December 2016 02: 12
      The main question is - at what altitude will miracle-judo-ships fly? Pilots have an axiom - the higher and faster - the safer. Conversely, the lower the plane flies and the lower its speed, the more likely a disaster will happen. This is a mathematical fact.
      1. 0
        7 November 2017 13: 05
        https://militaryarms.ru/voennaya-texnika/aviaciya
        / lun /
  19. 0
    30 December 2016 18: 41
    Quote: inkass_98
    Oleg Kaptsov, proving that this is a useless pile of metal is not

    Why not? if the ekranoplan is put on thicker armor, then even Kaptsov will vote "For"! )))
  20. 0
    22 January 2017 00: 27
    Launch airplanes, helicopters, airships, screen-plans and many others along the high-voltage power line (10-100) or along the Russian Railways on high-voltage electric motors ....
  21. 0
    6 July 2017 11: 12
    They ruined this direction. Alekseev was uncomfortable for officials, he was too independent. But Gorbachev and Yeltsin themselves understand this pure harm was their Western friends. It is disgusting when the fate of geniuses and their development depends on officials
  22. 0
    12 May 2020 17: 43
    On the website korabel.ru there is an article by Viktor Sokolov "It is possible, but not necessary". An expert's opinion on the possibilities of an ekranoplan as a vehicle is presented. I recommend.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"