Military Review

"Uralvagonzavod" in the current year put on the production of 7 weapons

21
In 2016, the UVZ corporation has begun the serial production of 7 weapons, the press service of the company reports.




“This is, first of all, the T-72B3 tank, a deeper modernization with a more powerful engine and an improved fire control system,” the release said.

In addition, “for the first time, production and serial production of the BMR-3MA armored demining machine, the modernized IMR-3M engineering machine, the upgraded two-link tractor DT-10PM, a special SPM fire engine of the original design, which has no world analogues,” were told in the press service.

Also upgraded heavy flamethrower system TOC-1A.

It is noted that "in 2016, in the interests of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, UVZ enterprises conducted more than 10 research and development work, delivered thousands of new and modernized weapons and military equipment to the troops over 1,2."
Photos used:
http://bastion-opk.ru
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Skeptic Self-Taught
    Skeptic Self-Taught 22 December 2016 13: 40
    +3
    They would still have to remove the bureaucracy - there would be no price ...
    1. vkl.47
      vkl.47 22 December 2016 13: 50
      +3
      Bureaucracy in all countries. It is like wishing there would be greed.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 22 December 2016 13: 57
        +4
        Quote: vkl.47
        Skeptic Self-taught Today, 13:40 New
        They would still have to remove the bureaucracy - there would be no price ...

        Quote: vkl.47
        Bureaucracy in all countries. It is like wishing there would be greed.

        I’m just wondering what would happen if they hadn’t stolen ... what
        The Uralvagonzavod Corporation has been managed by Oleg Sienko for the eighth consecutive year, and he is not going to leave anywhere, sources of Kompromat-Ural correspondents, surrounded by Nizhny Tagil top manager, know. In 2009, Oleg Viktorovich, perhaps, did not reach the leadership of the world's largest industrial enterprise, but over time he somehow settled down and sat down (Putin's friend, the head of Rostec, Sergei Chemezov, to help).
        But in the current 2016, at least two “black swans” flew over Sienko’s head. The first one was in February, when the general director of UVZ decided to celebrate his 50th anniversary in an inappropriately luxurious format, which caused a stormy resonance of negativity and calls to resign and glamor in private business (UVZ is a state-owned enterprise). The second - a few weeks ago, when a respectable business press reported that the curator of the defense in the federal government, Dmitry Rogozin, invited President Vladimir Putin to make organizational conclusions because of the exorbitant debts of UVZ that grew up under Sienko.
    2. Muvka
      Muvka 22 December 2016 14: 08
      +1
      T-72B3 is good ... Although the gun’s spaces are painfully large ... But at least the sides with DZ. And the relic is not contact ...
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 22 December 2016 15: 23
        +3
        There is not any Relic on it, a new modification comes with the same DZ - Contact 5.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 22 December 2016 17: 41
          +2
          No, with a relic.
          1. kapitan92
            kapitan92 22 December 2016 23: 04
            +3
            Quote: Muvka
            Vadim237 Today, 15: 23 ↑
            There is not any Relic on it, a new modification comes with the same DZ - Contact 5.

            Quote: Muvka
            Muvka Today, 17: 41 ↑
            No, with a relic.


            Vadim 237 is right! T 72B3 comes with "Contact-5"

            Installation of DZ "Contact-5" on the T-72B3.
      2. kapitan92
        kapitan92 22 December 2016 15: 46
        +4
        Quote: Muvka
        Although the gun’s spaces are painfully large ...

        Can be more?
        1. Manul
          Manul 22 December 2016 18: 13
          +2
          Quote: kapitan92
          Can be more?

          They do not mean gun shortcomings, but unprotected DZ areas of armor near the gun hi .
          1. kapitan92
            kapitan92 22 December 2016 20: 37
            +4
            Quote: Manul
            Quote: kapitan92
            Can be more?

            They do not mean gun shortcomings, but unprotected DZ areas of armor near the gun hi .

            Thank you After all, they will write like this, sit and think who has spaces in the gun or in the author of the post.
    3. Kenneth
      Kenneth 22 December 2016 17: 10
      0
      Bureaucracy is the basis of the modern business of production and management.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 22 December 2016 13: 55
    +4
    That's when the whole line of Almaty, Kurganets and Boomerang go into series, then you can be happy. At the same time, I recall the statement of the director of UVZ, which stated that, if desired, the T-90 can easily be made unmanned.
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 22 December 2016 14: 04
      +1
      But you must??? but in general I think it’s not difficult, but then you can and need a common projection, constructive concept and the conduct of the battle, etc. and tp change
      They did this unmanned:
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 22 December 2016 14: 11
        +3
        Quote: Samaritan
        But you must???

        I think so. The life of a soldier is priceless and putting thousands of them on the battlefield is impermissible luxury. Uranus-9 is a noble machine. Of course it will still be modernized and honed. And I’m sure that he’s in the right place on the fields of Syria, so we will quickly bring him to the condition of an effective combat unit equal to BMPT or even a tank.
        As for the unmanned T-90 ... And why not?
  3. Slon panteleimon
    Slon panteleimon 22 December 2016 14: 08
    +6
    I have one liberalist at work who is impatiently waiting for our defense industry to fail and all this scrap metal will be sent to melt down ..... perhaps I will throw off this "unpleasant" news for him, let him "rejoice"
  4. East
    East 22 December 2016 14: 57
    0
    Armata early? In Moscow have not yet been caught up?
  5. Slon panteleimon
    Slon panteleimon 22 December 2016 15: 14
    +1
    Quote: East
    Armata early? In Moscow have not yet been caught up?

    If I am not mistaken, Armat is currently undergoing a cycle of factory modernization and elimination of so-called "children's sores". As soon as the defects are eliminated, they promised to put the car into production. Something tells me that the final version will differ from the pre-production version, which we saw at the Victory Day parade.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 22 December 2016 15: 32
      +5
      Quote: SlonPanteleimon
      If I'm not mistaken, Armat is currently undergoing a cycle of factory modernization and elimination of the so-called "children's sores".

      The armata is already undergoing the military testing phase. For this, they either have already been sent to the troops, or 100 T-14s will be sent here.
  6. Ivan Ivanov
    Ivan Ivanov 22 December 2016 16: 42
    0
    If not special .. Does it make sense, with the modern development of anti-tank systems, to upgrade old tanks? maybe a pipeline with new ones is better?
  7. red_fox
    red_fox 22 December 2016 17: 31
    0
    Why do the T-72B3 produce new ones? It seems like they wrote that the 72nd old modifications are being upgraded to level B3. And if you do new ones, then no less than the T-90 ...
    1. Philip Staros
      Philip Staros 22 December 2016 23: 57
      0
      "Old" - deep modernization of the old T-72. They are all mixed up there - both new things from scratch, and the modernization of old cars.