US requires China to return intercepted underwater drone

93
News agency Reuters reports the interception of a US submarine by a Chinese Navy ship drone in the South China Sea. The interception took place on December 15 northwest of Subic Bay (about 100 km from the capital of the Philippines). It should be noted that an American military base was previously located in this area (until 1992), the goal of restoring which is being discussed in Washington.

Pentagon spokesman Jeff Davis said that this was "a provocation of China, since the signs of his US identity were clearly visible on the underwater unmanned vehicle."



Davis:
We demand that China return the device and call for the exclusion of such cases in the future. On the drone there was an English inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water.


US requires China to return intercepted underwater drone


It is reported that the underwater drone was used by an oceanographic vessel. USNS Bowditch "Exclusively for peaceful purposes." The American fleet all goals are purely peaceful ...

Pentagon press secretary Peter Cook states that "China has unlawfully seized US military assets."

At the same time in Washington can not yet conclude whether the Chinese actions were deliberate, or the ship intercepted the underwater drone by mistake. The US State Department protested about the actions of the Chinese Navy.
  • @MT_Consult
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

93 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +48
    17 December 2016 06: 30
    No crew, what does maritime law say?
    It seems who found one and slippers
    1. +14
      17 December 2016 06: 31
      the drone will be returned in parts ...
      1. +16
        17 December 2016 07: 34
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        the drone will be returned in parts ...

        Or, after a while, - a couple of dozen by weight laughing
        1. +8
          17 December 2016 10: 28
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          the drone will be returned in parts ...

          And the first part will be the ears from the genital organ lol
          1. +10
            17 December 2016 12: 20
            The drone had an English-language inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water.

            English-language inscriptions are written for English-speaking countries. And the Chinese do not have to know their MOV.
        2. +14
          17 December 2016 10: 31
          This time the "peeling stump" turned out to be yellow laughing
        3. +1
          17 December 2016 11: 02
          small wholesale laughing will return striped
          1. +4
            17 December 2016 11: 48
            Will definitely return laughing
      2. +34
        17 December 2016 07: 47
        So soon the Chinese drones on AliExpress will be on sale for $ 9.99 apiece. wassat
      3. +5
        17 December 2016 08: 22
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        the drone will be returned in parts ...

        If they return it whole, then they already have one. laughing
        1. 0
          17 December 2016 12: 34
          Quote: Gray Brother
          If they return it whole, then they already have one.

          The Chinese will offer a choice of 10 of them
      4. +3
        17 December 2016 09: 35
        well, they should show it to us too - friends like
    2. +7
      17 December 2016 06: 36
      Return, of course. But first they will copy. laughing
      1. +9
        17 December 2016 06: 50
        Quote: siberalt
        Return, of course. But first they will copy.

        They will reel in 100 kg of tar, correct the program a bit, and return it on their own. fellow
    3. +2
      17 December 2016 06: 45
      Quote: spech
      It seems who found one and slippers

      "Found" in front of the owner? smile
      A Chinese navy ship that followed the hydrograph for several days launched a small boat that picked up the apparatus. The request for his return, which was sent by radio to American sailors, was ignored.
      Cook explained that this is an unguided underwater vehicle - an unclassified "ocean glider" that is used to collect military oceanographic data such as salinity, water temperature and the speed of sound. "It conducted routine operations under international law about 50 nautical miles northwest of Subic Bay in the Philippines," Cook said in a statement.


      .
      .
      1. +1
        17 December 2016 14: 18
        Quote: Bayonet
        Quote: spech
        It seems who found one and slippers

        "Found" in front of the owner? smile
        A Chinese Navy ship that followed the hydrograph for several days.

        What are we doing? unclassified "ocean glider"? Wonderful, a little bit of coal, needles and what's next on the program? And go to yourself in peace.
        Provocation of China, no, the world community, of course, is also outraged, and our ... dorks are also ready to participate. That's just the captain superpowers why did he turn inappropriately to the ugliness?
        And I understand, provocation from the United States. A US Navy ship is sailing, feeding the fish, counting rare birds ...
    4. +6
      17 December 2016 06: 59
      "There is no crew, what does the maritime law say?
      It seems who found that and the slippers "
      All right. You can saliva for a long time, but according to the rules, the drone is now Chinese.
      1. +7
        17 December 2016 07: 14
        Quote: spech
        No crew, what does maritime law say?

        If an American flag had been drawn on it, then it would have been regarded as an attack on US territory.
        And if there is no flag, then the law of the sea is powerless. It counts as cleaning the sea from floating debris. soldier
        P.S. And it's time for the navies of foreign states to take care of purchasing such devices.
        1. +3
          17 December 2016 10: 22
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          If an American flag had been drawn on it, then it would have been regarded as an attack on US territory.
          And if there is no flag, then the law of the sea is powerless. It counts as cleaning the sea from floating debris

          This device, which has the immunity of the state, clearly states in English that it should not be removed from the water, this is the property of the United States.
          1. +2
            17 December 2016 10: 50
            Quote: Bayonet
            it is clearly stated in English that it should not be taken out of the water, it is a US property.

            Here is the correct drone, as I said - the flag flutters, the signs of state ownership are in place. There can be no complaints about this!
            Now look at the photo for the article and find your clear inscription on this yellow log. After all, this did not happen in the Gulf of Mexico, but in the South-Chinese sea, and therefore next time, if you please, gentlemen: a flag and an inscription in the entire corpus "USA" in Chinese characters. But this is some kind of piracy !!! China should raise a question in the UN Security Council: Why do minke whales do not respect sea right!!? am
            1. +1
              17 December 2016 11: 13
              Quote: Thunderbolt

              So that's why the Shuttles don't fly, they repainted it in the water.)))
            2. +2
              17 December 2016 12: 03
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Now look at the photo for the article and find your clear inscription on this yellow log.

              There are enough inscriptions there, just a snapshot of this does not reflect - the angle is not the same. smile
              1. +2
                17 December 2016 12: 15
                Quote: Bayonet
                the angle is not the same
                Americans don’t even ride a bicycle without their flag, and then suddenly they were embarrassed to draw, isn’t this fish a spy for an hour ..? belay
                1. +2
                  17 December 2016 12: 29
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  Americans don't even ride a bicycle without their flag

                  Yes, they respect their flag. Some even raise them near their homes, but not so long ago they could have been attracted for this in our country! smile
                  In Russia, the tricolor can be hung on holidays (when allowed to express their patriotism smile ) Federal Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation "On the State Flag of the Russian Federation" -
                  Article 3. The state flag of the Russian Federation is hung on buildings (or raised on masts, flagpoles) of local government bodies, public associations, enterprises, institutions and organizations, regardless of their form of ownership, as well as on residential buildings on public holidays of the Russian Federation.
                  1. +1
                    18 December 2016 08: 15
                    Quote: Bayonet
                    In Russia, the tricolor can be hung on holidays (when they are allowed to express their patriotism). Federal Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation "On the State Flag of the Russian Federation" -

                    Nothing of the kind. If everything is done decently, not for commercial or provocative purposes, then you can post it on weekdays. Article 9.1 directly indicates this.
                    My neighbor does just that. All year round he hangs the state one, on May 9 he replaces it with the Victory banner, but on the eve of November 4 he hangs out the USSR flag for a whole week.
                2. +3
                  17 December 2016 19: 17
                  Quote: Thunderbolt
                  Isn’t this a spy for an hour this fish ..?

                  Well, what are you, right!
                  In the article, Russian in white says:
                  The American Navy has all purely peaceful goals ...
                  laughing laughing laughing
          2. +2
            17 December 2016 14: 10
            This device, which has the immunity of the state, clearly states in English that it should not be removed from the water, this is the property of the United States.

            there is an instruction inside the package that requires you to read the instructions carefully before unpacking
      2. +3
        17 December 2016 19: 09
        Quote: Sharky
        All right. You can saliva for a long time, but according to the rules, the drone is now Chinese.

        May I remind you of how our ships intercepted the British reconnaissance ships that seized our torpedoes?
        They also had no crew and no inscriptions in English. However, when a weapon is pointed at you, and you are "with a bare ass", then decisions are made in favor of the strongest ...
        I personally do not know how the commander of a Chinese ship would behave if the Burke approached him with a "request" to return US property "back." Moreover, the owner of the drone witnessed his boarding to the hunfuz.
        This is a direct challenge to the amam. But it looks like they swallowed a slap in the face. sad
    5. +2
      17 December 2016 07: 33
      What is there to say about the law of the sea ... More than 71 years have passed since the Japanese had to return the gifts to the United States, presented by them on August 6 and 9, 1945 belay Isn't it time? ...
      As for the drone, they are drin ... you know what ... lol
    6. +4
      17 December 2016 10: 48
      "... We demand that China return the device and urge to exclude such cases in the future. The drone had an English-language inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water."

      A Chinese comrade is not required to understand the English inscription. stop You have to write in Chinese when you spy in Chinese waters ...
    7. +1
      17 December 2016 18: 21
      Quote: spech
      No crew, what does maritime law say?
      It seems who found one and slippers

      In addition, there was no inscription in Chinese that it should not be removed from the water laughing
  2. +8
    17 December 2016 06: 32
    They will study it, copy it on a "copier", put it into production, and then perhaps will give. If any details are not enough "- I don't sleep, I beat it -" laughing
  3. +6
    17 December 2016 06: 37
    on the interception of an American submarine drone by a Chinese Navy ship

    All the same, the Chinese are great. in such cases they do not breed diplomatic muddle. And the Americans, as always, hoped for their "exclusiveness"
    The drone had an English-language inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water

    Those. we can spy and engage in dark affairs, but no one has the right, we will see the inscription in English, to oppose it. Now if you get it, then after a complete study of the device and the removal of information, which can also say a lot.
    1. +3
      17 December 2016 06: 42
      The drone had an English-language inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water

      Well, not in Chinese, the spell)) that's why it didn't work))
  4. +5
    17 December 2016 06: 44
    Give the Americans their DREN, the narrow-eyed devils. laughing
    1. +3
      17 December 2016 06: 49
      narrow-eyed devils

      If the "Mordvin" tell you that you have a characteristic accent (dialect), which is seen behind the Mordvins, you will probably be offended. Why insult a people with a thousand-year history? Perhaps this is irony on your part, but some not very pleasant.
      1. +20
        17 December 2016 07: 03
        Quote: rotmistr60
        narrow-eyed devils

        If the "Mordvin" tell you that you have a characteristic accent, which is seen behind the Mordvins, you will probably be offended. Why insult a people with a thousand-year history?

        I have a tooth on them. My Chinese lighter exploded recently in my hand when I was lighting it. All the gas splashed out on his hand, and flared up. He began to extinguish the carpet, and the carpet burst into flames. In general, they wanted to blow me up, and even burn my hut. A second-degree burn, a damaged sweater and carpet, medical expenses. And if I got gas on my forehead? Everyone would take me for Gorbachev, and beat me in the face. Again, moral harm. So that. Who should I contact for compensation? request
        1. Fox
          +4
          17 December 2016 07: 17
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          Who to apply for compensation

          quit smoking.
          1. +7
            17 December 2016 07: 22
            Quote: Fox
            quit smoking.

            No, I'm buying matches now. Balabanovsky. I support the domestic manufacturer. And the smoke is Crimean. And here you swear at me. crying
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. +2
              17 December 2016 08: 57
              Quote: Boris Zhitkovsky
              who knows what he smokes

              Cigarettes "White Sun" feel
            2. +3
              17 December 2016 10: 25
              Quote: Boris Zhitkovsky
              It would be fine if the Mordovians only smoked, although who knows that he smokes. And then we had Mordvins on the term, so they were all inclined to USN. And they also say the Mordovians and the Chuvash, incurable A.L.K.A. ...

              And those are not like that and these are not like that! Whose will you be?
              1. 0
                17 December 2016 10: 53
                Alexander, and whose will you be? Previously, the comments were often pro-liberal, then they began to appear less often.
                1. +2
                  17 December 2016 11: 07
                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  Alexander, and whose will you be? Previously, the comments were often pro-liberal, then they began to appear less often.

                  From Rostov-on-Don we hi smile And less often he began to appear - it is just that sometimes it is not interesting to argue with some unpleasant or downright stupid personalities. Speaking of "pro-liberal" comments, I have no political orientation, I prefer to have my own opinion, rather than dance to someone's tune, and try to be guided only by common sense. There is no need to hang labels on me and rank me among different peoples, groups, etc. I was already here an "Armenian", a Jew, a "mattress", a "liberal" and God knows who else - well, stupidity is right smile hi
                  1. 0
                    17 December 2016 11: 13
                    No need to put labels on me and rank them among different nations, groups, etc.

                    Well, this is not for me, I didn’t hang labels on you .. Although I know that at one time you often neglected me for my views. which diverged from yours.
                    polemicize with some unpleasant or downright stupid people

                    You perfectly understand that the personalities on the site are different. hi
                    1. +2
                      17 December 2016 11: 27
                      Quote: rotmistr60
                      Well, this is not for me, I didn’t hang labels on you .. Although I know that at one time you often neglected me for my views. which diverged from yours.

                      I didn't mean you. And about the cons, once I had more than a hundred of them for my comment! I think it's right that they were canceled. By the way, I got a warning from the administration for "Russophobia"! smile And it was like this, after another cry from someone (I don’t remember who): "give America to the Indians", wrote "then give Yakutia to the Yakuts, Chukotka to the Chukchi." This was regarded as Russophobia - no words! request
                      In general, this is a strange stigma - "RUS" - Russian and "FOBIA" (from the Greek φόβος - fear, fear) - comes the fear of everything Russian. But I am Russian myself - why should I be afraid of myself? wassat hi
                      1. 0
                        17 December 2016 11: 39
                        By the way, I got a warning from the administration

                        I was already the first to receive a warning about the new rules (I will not say press the red round). It's funny, but you can't go anywhere.
                      2. +2
                        17 December 2016 13: 56
                        Quote: Bayonet
                        And about the cons, once raped more than a hundred for their comment! I think it’s right that they were canceled.

                        And I think it’s wrong, although I myself had a hundred for comment, for my jokes. But here is the story with a lighter - the true truth. 10 days were treated. And he applied cabbage, and grated potatoes, and bought ointment, and he studied the military paramedic’s directory on the 53 of the year, and studied the directory of traditional medicine. So what about acer technology? Reliable?
              2. +1
                17 December 2016 10: 57
                Quote: Bayonet
                Whose will you be?

                It seems God's chosen. Therefore, he has the right to insult (according to their concepts).
                I also exploded, though not in my hand, lay on the bedside table.
        2. +4
          17 December 2016 07: 22
          In general, they wanted to blow me up

          I sympathize. It turns out that the Chinese special services are working not only against the United States, but also against yourself (Mordvin 3). Take care of yourself.
          1. +2
            17 December 2016 07: 28
            Quote: rotmistr60
            Stay safe.

            Thank. And I did not mean drone, namely drn, and this, by the way, besides a big stick, also a big member. You can google it. fellow
        3. +3
          17 December 2016 07: 40
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          I have a Chinese lighter recently exploded in my hand

          I sympathize ... and this is not the first time I have heard this sad story from you --- it can be seen well "banged." Forward, please be careful and finally buy yourself a normal lighter! hi
        4. +3
          17 December 2016 09: 24
          - Your son smokes, smokes, smokes!
          “What, does he smoke so much?”
          “No, only when he drinks.”
          “Does he also drink?”
          - No, only when he loses the cards.

          And the rest, a beautiful marquise ......
        5. 0
          17 December 2016 16: 18
          and whose gas is Chinese?
          1. +2
            17 December 2016 16: 25
            Quote: 31R-US
            and whose gas is Chinese?

            Oh, but I didn’t think so. Gazpromovsky probably. What kind of disgrace is going on in my hut ?! Aye ?! laughing
      2. +3
        17 December 2016 08: 01
        If the African American is black-Negro, the Mongol and Chinese are narrow-eyed, Europeans are wide-eyed, then where is the insult in the words -Negro, narrow-eyed Asian or Dutchman with round eyes .. This political correctness got it. Maybe the word Russian also became an insult .. They got it by sharing!
        1. +1
          17 December 2016 09: 28
          Quote: 30 vis
          Maybe the word Russian also became an insult

          Ruski (Raski) (Eng. Ruski, Russki, Ruskies, less often - Rusky, Russky, Rooskies) - neglectful English-language slang nickname of Russians.
          You can be proud when you are in London.
          1. +1
            17 December 2016 09: 48
            Quote: AID.S
            Ruski (Raski) (Eng. Ruski, Russki, Ruskies, less often - Rusky, Russky, Rooskies) - neglectful English-language slang nickname of Russians.

            It’s not offensive, from the word at all. The same story with Moskal, especially for me - a resident of the capital. Apparently the whole thing in the intonation and arrogant expression of the muzzle.
            1. 0
              17 December 2016 10: 08
              Quote: Uryukc
              It’s not offensive, from the word at all.

              They will offend, it will be too late, it will be necessary to answer or go for water ...
              1. 0
                17 December 2016 10: 45
                Quote: AID.S
                They will offend, it will be too late, it will be necessary to answer or go for water ...

                Here is the third option, put a bolt on and not respond.
          2. +1
            17 December 2016 12: 52
            Britons, Little British, Englishwoman. the contemptuous name of the British in Russia is Russian .. And the way the Russians call me among themselves, the British are deeply spit!
        2. 0
          17 December 2016 09: 47
          Quote: 30 vis
          This political correctness got

          Oh you .... white ... wide-eyed .... here))
          1. 0
            17 December 2016 12: 54
            What are you doing? Complexes are serious! Share with us!
            1. 0
              17 December 2016 14: 07
              What complexes?
              Quote: Uryukc
              Oh you .... white ... wide-eyed .... here))

              This joke ... Karl)) (two brackets are a replacement for emotion and mean a smile)
  5. +1
    17 December 2016 06: 54
    You’ll either send a missile there, or a drone pr ... ut.
  6. +2
    17 December 2016 06: 58
    I applaud the Chinese, fucking grated for the whole face of the United States, and not a drone! Make a small model and give it away!
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      17 December 2016 07: 09
      Quote: Boris Zhitkovsky
      I give such comments, I give respects to the Buryats, Yakuts, Altaians, Tuvans. They are the same h ... that they would know how you feel about them. Here, but it’s weak to tell you to your relatives Bato Doshidorzhieva. Or relatives Nomokonova. Let They’ll think. And they also say that mordvinians have muzzle faces ... well, especially mordvinians.

      And you read my comment, higher, under the Rotmistr, and then judge.
  8. +2
    17 December 2016 07: 02
    Yankees, and nefig wandering in foreign seas and scatter their belongings where nepodyad ...
    1. +2
      17 December 2016 10: 29
      Quote: Volka
      Yankees, and nefig hang around in foreign seas

      In international waters in the South China Sea.
  9. +2
    17 December 2016 07: 06
    And I am Chinese, I am mildly blind, I see poorly. Signs were not different.
    Who are you, where to return?
    How do you prove yours? How do you justify what you did not do against me?
    But really funny, really. Probably a hundred lard swelled there. And tomorrow, the drawings will be freely available on Yandex.
  10. +1
    17 December 2016 07: 18
    Hmm ... now in California you can’t jump into the ocean ... Chinese copies of drones, bites eggs.
  11. 0
    17 December 2016 07: 32
    Will definitely be returned. In parts. Only the clones will be set up first.
  12. +3
    17 December 2016 07: 37
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    the drone will be returned in parts ...

    The Chinese compensate them for sending $ 5 sneakers wassat
  13. +1
    17 December 2016 07: 44
    According to them, the captured device acted as part of an open oceanographic research program. He measured the salinity, temperature and purity of the water in order to facilitate the work of military sonar systems.
    https://lenta.ru/news/2016/12/16/yohohoandabottle
    ofrum /
    Here is the key phrase "in order to facilitate the work of military sonar systems"... This is from the category of anecdotes. If you draw a flag of the country on a cruise missile and launch it towards the enemy in order to “measure the purity and temperature of the air, as well as the correspondence of the terrain to be flown to the memory,” then it should not be shot down in any case. stop
    1. 0
      17 December 2016 08: 20
      What do you think? If you have lost something, then look. Found - ask to return, does not help - to the police or the court. China is entitled to reward for the discovery, plus reimbursement of the costs of capture, transportation, disassembly, copying and assembly of the apparatus. I’m afraid it won’t work, the Americans will count and refuse.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    17 December 2016 08: 36
    The drone had an English-language inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water.

    This is not to dry out? laughing
    And there were no English speakers among the Chinese crew, and they realized that whoever pulled this out first, this apparatus, belongs to the water! bully
  16. 0
    17 December 2016 08: 50
    It was necessary to make one more inscription, in Chinese. Well, the Chinese sailors do not know how to catch American.
  17. +1
    17 December 2016 09: 03
    what fell then disappeared
  18. 0
    17 December 2016 09: 11
    If the US does not have an agreement with China on the return of underwater drones, then look-fistulas now for this drone. Why didn't they, the Americans, catch their drone before the Chinese? - And now - "who got up earlier - that and the slippers."
  19. 0
    17 December 2016 09: 25
    well done Chinese good probably already dismantled laughing
  20. +1
    17 December 2016 09: 36
    Quote: spech
    It seems who found one and slippers

    You are right! Maritime law states that if you find a floating object without a crew in neutral waters you can pick it up as a prize. bully lol hi
    1. +1
      17 December 2016 11: 14
      Quote: fa2998
      The law of the sea says that if you find a floating object without a crew in neutral waters you can pick it up as a prize

      This is not the case! They watched the ship for several days, pulled out an apparatus covering themselves onboard, ignored the radio call. request
  21. 0
    17 December 2016 10: 11
    The drone had an English-language inscription stating that it should not be removed from the water.

    Passed amulet. laughing
    And the next one seems to be mined, no one wants to catch ..
  22. 0
    17 December 2016 10: 14
    There was a drone, and became drin. The East, however, is a delicate matter.
  23. +1
    17 December 2016 11: 55
    The wrong one was intercepted (with 47: 50):

  24. 0
    17 December 2016 12: 43
    rotmistr60,
    I was the first to have a warning under the new rules
    Well, here I am in front - already three! smile hi
  25. 0
    17 December 2016 13: 15
    The CCP will send the owners of the FRS "nah" as usual, and soon similar devices will appear on sale, but cheaper.
  26. +2
    17 December 2016 17: 56
    Mordvin 3,
    So what about the ace technique? Reliable?
    I prefer Asus. And at the expense of the lighter, I sympathize and wish you the fastest recovery from burns!
    If you really do not smoke, there is a plasma express on Ali (without fuel). It will cost 500 rubles. hi
  27. 0
    17 December 2016 19: 29
    It's funny! What if the Americans had captured a Chinese drone off their shores so they could respond to the Chinese?
  28. 0
    17 December 2016 20: 54
    I remember once they intercepted a US reconnaissance plane. The penguins also "yak-yaky" and received it in boxes.
  29. +1
    18 December 2016 01: 11
    When you throw a wallet with money on the sidewalk, then you need to tie a fishing line to it - then it will be cool. And no bluetooth or wifi instead of a fishing line will pierce - without it, anything will not be fun.
  30. 0
    18 December 2016 12: 07
    Will return after the Chinese disassemble and copy it))))
  31. mmk
    0
    18 December 2016 17: 24
    They don't ask, they demand!
  32. 0
    18 December 2016 19: 36
    [quotePentagon spokesman Peter Cook states that "China carried out an illegal seizure of American military property."] [/ quote]
    A strange statement is military property, and the ship that launched it is a peaceful research vessel. Interrupted the scientific and espionage operation of the SGA Navy? Nefig to spy on other people's ships, the Chinese m. do not understand English - well, illiterate laughing , decided to find out at home what they caught in the sea-okiyane! laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"