"Infauna" - what lies behind a strange name

32
We should start with a rather unusual name for the complex, which almost does not reflect its purpose, and even more so its characteristics. The specialists of biologists "infauna" means different animal organisms that live in the bottom sediments of lakes, rivers and ponds. One can only assume that when choosing this name for their apparatus, the creators saw a kind of analogy between the large number of tasks solved by the complex and the huge variety of living beings that make up the infawn.

"Infauna" - what lies behind a strange name


However, as stated in such cases, story this is silent, published data that could confirm this thought was not found. But still, this name is a very specific model of technology, which has certain characteristics, purpose and capabilities. This radio-electronic complex has been sufficiently illuminated in open print and electronic sources.

The first information about the start of work on the creation of a complex of electronic intelligence (REER) and electronic suppression (REP) appeared in the media and the Internet in 2009. And in January of the same year, the first four vehicles equipped with the Infauna complex entered the troops.

In 2009, there was information that four years were spent on developing a unique complex. Many specialists from a number of enterprises in Voronezh, Moscow and St. Petersburg worked on the project. Comparing the time of the messages and the declared duration of the work, we can say that the development of the complex began in 2005. Mikhail Artyomov was appointed to the position of the chief designer, who now holds the post of Deputy General Director of OJSC Concern Sozvezdie, located in Voronezh.

At the same time, it became known that upon completion of the series of necessary tests in 2010, they would launch a serial production of the complexes. Practically, the state tests of the complex ended in the autumn of 2010. By the end of this year, they had to start mass production, and in 2011, they should switch to mass production. At the same time, the necessary number of specialists were started at the interspecific training center of the Russian Armed Forces, of which two crews of the Infauna radio suppression and radio intelligence complexes were subsequently formed.

According to the official website of the Ministry of Defense, published on January 16 2012, the four first vehicles equipped with this complex were delivered to the EW units of the Svir Airborne Division, which is based in Ivanovo, and the airborne assault brigade in Novorossiysk.

The scope of application of the newest multifunctional complex of electronic suppression and radio intelligence is the protection of armored and automotive vehicles and personnel from damage by radio-controlled mine-explosive devices, and means of optical and radio communications.

The complex has the ability to produce aerosol interference, which nominally allows you to use them to protect against high precision weaponsequipped with laser or video control systems. To solve problems of this type, the complex will be used in the units of the electronic warfare troops and the rapid reaction forces of the Russian army.

The multifunctionality of the complex is provided by technical means included in its composition. The media reported that the solution of a wide range of tasks is carried out with both traditional and the latest modern developments of means of electronic control of communications and control.

All this greatly expands the functionality of the complex and greatly simplifies the electronic suppression and installation of aerosol curtains. Among the distinctive features of the new development are the latest solutions in the field of wide-band and high-speed radio intelligence and techniques that provide a high radius for protection against mine-blasting devices with radio control.

The chief designer of the complex, Mikhail Artyomov, notes that it includes special equipment that amplifies the covered objects using aerosol curtains. According to him, for the creation of the "Infauna" were "the first in world practice" resolved the problem of integrating all the most effective at the moment protection methods that use electronic warfare.

The entire electronic filling of the complex is located on the modern K1Sh1 wheeled chassis, with the basis of the BTR-80, which has high technical and operational performance. The chassis can carry up to 1800 kg of various equipment with a total mass of the entire complex up to 12 tons. Experience of practical use has shown that this chassis will allow effective use of the complex in combat conditions.

In addition to the above, it can be added that, under the current conditions, the ongoing struggle against international terrorists and illegal armed formations, the Infauna complex will be in demand in hot spots around the world. Unparalleled at the moment, it will significantly increase the effectiveness of military units.

Based on materials Arms-expo
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. grizzlir
    +10
    27 January 2012 08: 43
    Well, they finally guessed to create something good on the basis of an armored car and not in a zilah or a kamaz with a kung. What is especially pleasing is that the equipment was installed on our proven BTR 80, which crawls everywhere, and did not put it into some kind of parquet Iveka. All that remains is to wait whether this equipment is in the Russian troops or will it again perform tasks in the Emirates and India.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      0
      27 January 2012 19: 00
      It’s already being purchased, though it’s going back to Chechnya.
      1. +1
        28 January 2012 13: 07
        Secretly to Chechnya? The report describes the location of the complex, there was no word about Chechnya. Although, there, for example, to protect army formations, it may be necessary.
      2. 0
        29 January 2012 09: 28
        http://twower.livejournal.com/657325.html

        here there’s a lot of things for electronic warfare, but in general it’s not easier to make an electronic warfare complex on an aircraft carrier,
  2. +2
    27 January 2012 08: 45
    This car, these are the characteristics! With the arrival of these machines, our airborne forces became an order of magnitude stronger and more powerful + high mobility of Infauna.
    1. Region71
      +4
      27 January 2012 09: 02
      I doubt very much its airmobility. The car is definitely not for the Airborne Forces.
      1. -1
        27 January 2012 09: 09
        I do not agree with you! If we have light tanks landing, then they can. Machine is accurate for airborne. Since its functions: protection against guided missiles, suppression of enemy communications, etc. In modern wars, the machine is priceless.
        1. Region71
          +3
          27 January 2012 09: 14
          For the BTR 80, the suspension is not designed for landing, for all airmobile cars, the ground clearance is changing, the car is crouching. You can’t throw off such a platform.
          1. 0
            27 January 2012 09: 49
            Then answer the question: why was it taken by the airborne forces if it cannot be dropped, how can it be brought to the center of hostilities?
            1. KA
              KA
              +2
              28 January 2012 22: 41
              The K1SH1 machine was not created for the Airborne Forces, there is a command version (UKShM on the basis of which the Unified Tactical Control System is being built) and a coherent one, it is not intended for landing! The REP "Infauna" complex is designed to accompany the columns of equipment from different departments (Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Internal Affairs. FSB).
          2. guessed
            -1
            27 January 2012 10: 13
            KAMAZ landing. He certainly does not change the ground clearance. So the armored personnel carriers drop.
            1. grizzlir
              0
              27 January 2012 15: 05
              Everything is right and wrong in its own right. According to the new concept of using the Airborne Forces, the airborne assault forces were equipped with non-airborne equipment. Just like the tanks arrived at the explosives during the Chechen campaigns, the armored forces remained in the explosives right now. not even been experimentally yet.
    2. +3
      28 January 2012 13: 08
      And what are the characteristics? they were almost not named, and could not be named, since military secret... wink wink wink

      I want to believe that the complex is good!
      1. Volkhov
        +2
        28 January 2012 18: 34
        In appearance, this tree will not pass under all bridges, but if you need to hide in the forest or drive through it, you need to saw in front of the branch ... As if they put a ship's antenna on a car. For Sahara, and better on Mars ...
        1. +3
          28 January 2012 18: 46
          Quote: Volkhov
          In appearance, this tree will not pass under all bridges, but if you need to hide in the forest or drive through it, you need to saw in front of the branch ... As if they put a ship's antenna on a car. For Sahara, and better on Mars ...

          This "Christmas tree" is hiding in the field hiding in that armored box that is under it and the height of the car will be lower than the Urals, standing next to it.
  3. alseek
    0
    27 January 2012 08: 49
    It is not very clear why it is needed, how does the "aerosol curtain" differ from smoke bombs? About electronic warfare I can not say anything probably in modern combat, a necessary thing, but spray aerosols?
    1. Region71
      +3
      27 January 2012 09: 04
      Aerosol is not only a laser beam that flames, but also gives illumination to radars and suppresses the thermal background of the equipment.
    2. +7
      27 January 2012 09: 49
      For individual protection of armored vehicles from anti-tank systems such as "TOU", "Hot", "Milan", "Dragon", as well as "Meyervik" and "Hellfire" with laser homing heads and guided artillery projectile "Copperhead", the Russian complex "Shtora -1". Multilateral field tests on T-72 and T-80 tanks have confirmed its high efficiency. The complex significantly reduces the likelihood of hitting a protected object: missiles with semi-automatic command control systems - 3-5 times, missiles with laser homing heads, as well as guided artillery shells - 4-5 times, artillery shells when using laser rangefinders during firing - 1,5 times. The effectiveness of the use of the complex can be significantly increased if measures are taken to reduce its optical, thermal and radar signature at the protected object.
      The Shtora-1 complex consists of two independent systems: a remote system for setting up aerosol formation, designed to overlap the fields of view (instrumental and visual) guidance systems using laser illumination, and an optoelectronic countermeasure station TShU 1-7, designed to organize false signals in the control loop of anti-tank shells with semi-automatic command guidance systems.
      The Shtora-1 complex provides: jamming in the form of modulated infrared radiation affecting the semi-automatic missile control system; automatic shooting of an aerosol-forming grenade in the direction of the laser illumination source and overlapping this direction with an aerosol curtain, determining the direction to the laser illumination source and issuing a command to turn the tank turret in the indicated direction, light and sound alarms when the tank is irradiated with laser targeting devices and rangefinders, setting in front of the tank of the masking aerosol curtain.

      http://armor.kiev.ua/ptur/armor/shtora.html
    3. KA
      KA
      0
      28 January 2012 22: 55
      The aerosol curtain, unlike the smoke curtain, has a wider spectrum of non-transmitted electromagnetic radiation, in short, the smoke curtain is only in the visible range, and the aerosol curtain also closes in the infrared range.
  4. -3
    27 January 2012 08: 52
    In general, I think we need to place them in space, so that all sub-podsosnoks under the key ...
    1. Volkhov
      +2
      27 January 2012 21: 41
      This is a rover - to jam the Rover.
  5. Owl
    +3
    27 January 2012 10: 09
    In addition to the machine itself, it is also necessary to have a trained crew, it is necessary to constantly involve the car with the crew in exercises and practical exercises in combat training, with such loads on the equipment, spare parts and repairmen will be necessary.
    1. Hans grohman
      +2
      27 January 2012 15: 58
      With your permission, I’ll supplement it.
      It is highly desirable that the crew consist of contractors / officers.
      And on the machine itself - a very credible thing. She would not have been superfluous in the BB and in the army, but by and large, she would have been useful in the MP.
      IMHO, of course.
  6. alps
    -2
    27 January 2012 16: 37
    Quote: Eagle Owl

    In addition to the machine itself, it is also necessary to have a trained crew, it is necessary to constantly involve the car with the crew in exercises and practical exercises in combat training, with such loads on the equipment, spare parts and repairmen will be necessary.

    Was that for whom it was said? Or I will say differently - why?
    1. Owl
      +4
      27 January 2012 18: 16
      I just use the example of "neighbors" (air defense) to see what a "goyushnik" soldier is and the fact that sometimes they try not to use equipment in class (so that they don't break).
  7. marauder
    +1
    27 January 2012 18: 35
    But it seems to me that the article is nothing. A lot of letters and nothing is said.

    "aerosol curtain" is a type of smoke bombs that are fired from the sides and create a smoke cloud to hide from high-precision weapons. is installed on tanks. Well, we put it on Infaune, very wonderful.

    And what the "infauna" itself does not say anything.
    If it’s secret, then there’s no need to take a place here.
    1. Sergh
      +1
      27 January 2012 19: 27
      Quote: Maroder
      And what the "infauna" itself does not say anything

      Well, it’s not said, radio-electronic suppression of control and communications, radio-electronic suppression and radio reconnaissance, destruction by radio-controlled mine-explosive devices, and optical and radio communications. And aerosol, this is self-defense. But you can guess that this thing is clearly able to listen and eavesdrop. I think so, with the installation of radio interference, the air defense system and some ground-based groups can also protect against impact, but not one device, but two or three from the GOS. Although which radius produces unknown, the mystery is eprst.
      1. Sergh
        +1
        28 January 2012 05: 31
        Yes, by the way, here the thought slipped through, though this is my assumption, if this device was placed in electronic warfare units, then it is likely that it can affect the UAV signal or, in any case, block it from the operator.
        I would like to ask this question to the developers! Antenna I see a circular, broadband.
      2. +2
        28 January 2012 13: 12
        I’ll correct you- protection from defeat by radio-controlled explosive devices (signal blocking), and not from defeat by radio-controlled ones.
      3. KA
        KA
        0
        28 January 2012 23: 07
        Quote: Sergh
        electronic suppression of control and communications equipment, electronic suppression and radio reconnaissance, destruction by radio-controlled mine explosive devices, and optical and radio communications. And aerosol, this is self-defense.

        This is not written correctly.
        Radio-electronic suppression (REP) of controls is NOT WANTED! He does not carry out defeats by radio-controlled mine-explosive devices, he conducts electronic warfare of radio-controlled mine-explosive devices and radio communications equipment, and he puts aerosol curtains for group protection (to protect equipment so that it can leave the ambush site).
  8. +4
    28 January 2012 12: 15
    The Sozvezdie concern will have nothing more. The old director, a professional, was removed. They sent from Moscow a former deputy by profession of a meteorologist, behind whose shoulders two collapsed similar enterprises. The other day, in order to reorganize, 6000 employees of the institute were given a notice that their positions are being reduced. The entire institute (Voronezh Scientific Research Institute of Communications) is in limbo. This government was already reorganizing the Voronezh KBKhA (design rapid chemical automatics), after which satellites fell like autumn leaves. The trouble is, if the shoemaker starts to bake the pies, and the cake-maker starts making boots. This is all 3,14dorosny government of the Russian Federation.
    1. Region71
      0
      28 January 2012 17: 49
      Why be surprised if even the Minister of Defense is a furniture maker. And well, a master, otherwise a furniture manager.
    2. guessed
      +2
      28 January 2012 20: 25
      Bekkiev Azret Yusupovich

      Bekkiev Azret Yusupovich (b. 1952) - General Director of the Concern Constellation OJSC. Professor. He has a doctorate in technical sciences. He graduated from the Physics Department of Moscow State University, as well as graduate school at the same university. He headed such structures as VEO RAS, Rosvooruzhenie-KB. He worked at the Ministry of Industry, Science and Technology of the Russian Federation from 2000 to 2004 - as head of the Department of Military Programs. Then he collaborated with the Ministry of Industry and Energy as the deputy head of the Department of the defense industry complex of this structure.

      From 2006 to 2008 headed the Duma Committee on Industry, Construction and High Technology. Before being appointed head of the Constellation, he worked at the Russian Technologies State Corporation and was a member of its board.

      Azret Bekkiev is a member of the Russian Academy of Military Sciences, a laureate of state and government prizes, as well as many other awards.
      Back_icon Back


      What exactly did he ruin?
      "Meteorologist" graduated from the Physics Department of Moscow State University .... no matter how ..
      1. -1
        29 January 2012 17: 34
        THE PREVIOUS COMRADE OR FROM THE FINGER DID THE NEWS OF APPOINTMENT,
        EITHER IS A DESINFORMER FOR THE PLEASURE OF ANY PARTY, SUCH AS SHOWING INSOLVENCY IN THE SELECTION OF PERSONNEL OF THE RULING MOST. AN ATTEMPT TO POLITIZE THE DISCUSSION OF PURE TECHNICAL ISSUES IN WHICH I DO NOT MEAN ANYTHING.
  9. Nechai
    0
    28 January 2012 17: 56
    The Airborne Forces use NOT ONLY the usual parachute landing, there is another VERY PERSPECTIVE METHOD. And besides who refused the landing method. Dimensions - so the ordered AN-124 and not enter.
    Quote: jindol47
    The old director, the professional, was removed.
    Unfortunately, today this is a common practice - in anticipation of the receipt of financial funds, there is a removal of those involved in the creation and resolution of the dough of his little man.
  10. dr. Mengele
    0
    31 January 2012 20: 04
    I recall a model of equipment from the failed film of one underdirector based on the Strugatsky book smile
  11. beech
    0
    4 February 2012 20: 57
    again, they will do in unit numbers per year !!!
  12. infauna
    +1
    24 March 2012 16: 31
    The machine can protect itself and the convoy (up to 500 m) from being blown up by means of RUMVU, using powerful broadband obstruction and sighting interference (with various types of modulation), hide the convoy from aiming fire with a smoke screen, block communications in a radius of up to 5 km, record REO, to communicate in the VHF and HF bands, to route and indicate targets by GPS and Glonas ... and I assure you much more.
    But why the heck does Russia need it if you can wash the babos at the enterprise,
    disband everything to hell, organize a desk with the production of crush cell phones in cinemas or wifi on electric trains.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"