Tu-214P reconnaissance aircraft returned from Syria

39
On Friday at the Moscow-based airdrome Chkalovsky landed a Russian integrated reconnaissance aircraft Tu-214R (Reg. No. RF-64514), which since July has been performing tasks in Syria and based at Hmeimim airbase, reports bmpd with reference to the resource www.flightradar24.com, tracking the movement of the military aviation.





“Thus, the“ second round ”of the Tu-214Р aircraft in Syria was completed. Recall that this RF-64514 board (the second built copy of the Tu-214Р) already performed tasks in Syria from 15 to 29 in February of 2016 of the year. Then the plane flew to Khmeimim from the factory airfield of the Kazan Aviation Plant named after S.P. Gorbunova (KAZ, branch of PJSC "Tupolev") ", - the author notes.

Tu-214P flight track (RF-64514 registration number, 42305014 serial number, 514 serial number) with Hamim in Chkalovsky 09.12.2016
  • Ahmad Rabiaa Al Khayer / twitter.com/MathieuMorant, www.flightradar24.com / twitter.com/galandecZP
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    12 December 2016 09: 59
    So next time the barmaley will attack Palmyra even easier?
    1. +3
      12 December 2016 10: 22
      Yes, we don’t have AN-30 there, they are also on the level.
      1. +9
        12 December 2016 10: 45
        So they didn’t notice the thuja heap of spirits at Palmyra?
        and then they won’t even notice somewhere else.
    2. +3
      12 December 2016 10: 45
      What bothers you so much Palmira? It’s easier to beat an enemy in a clear field than in cities.
    3. +5
      12 December 2016 11: 10
      Quote: the most important
      So next time the barmaley will attack Palmyra even easier?

      The article says what tasks this complex performed. "....... has been performing tasks in Syria since July and based at the Khmeimim airbase, reports bmpd with reference to the resource www.flightradar24.com, tracking the movements of military aircraft "....
    4. +5
      12 December 2016 12: 03


      Who cares, some performance characteristics:
      Engines - 2 x TVRD PS-90A - turbofan engine with a high bypass ratio, with a mixture of air and gas flow, a common jet nozzle and reverse thrust.
      Thrust take-off thrust (МСА, Н = 0) - 16000 kg
      Thrust maximum cruising thrust (МСА + 100С, Н = 11 km, М = 0.8) - 3400 kg
      Bypass ratio at max. mode - 4,7
      Compression ratio at max. mode - 31,1
      Air consumption - 485 kg / s
      The specific fuel consumption at cruise mode (H = 11 km, M = 0.8, ISA + 100С) - 0,595 kg / kgf per hour
      Engine length with air intake - 5530 mm
      Fan diameter - 1,90 m
      Engine weight - 4800 kg

      TTX of the aircraft (base Tu-214):
      Maximum take-off weight - kg 110.750
      Maximum landing weight - kg 93.000
      The fuel mass at full refueling with a keel tank is 35.710 kg
      Payload weight - 25.200 kg

      Take-off distance - 2030 m
      Weather for automatic landing - cat. II ICAO

      Equipment: equipment complex, head developer - JSC "Concern of Radio Engineering" Vega. The equipment complex includes:

      - multi-frequency radio-technical complex MRK-411, including several radars with a phased array of lateral (2 radars on each side) and circular (radar under the fuselage in the rear of the aircraft) review; The radio-technical complex was developed by FSUE "TsNIRI named after Academician AI Berg" on the subject of the "Frankcia-4KRR" design and development project. The complex provides information acquisition both in active and passive modes. Also, the equipment allows you to intercept radio communications.
      RTK detection range - up to 250 km with a flight altitude of 9000-12000 m
      high-resolution optoelectronic system (OESVR) "Fraction" (developed by TPK "Linkos", http://www.linkos-tcp.ru), located in the fairing in the lower part of the fuselage; OESVR provides real-time acquisition of terrain images in the visible and infrared ranges with the preservation of the primary array of images on a magnetic storage device;
      Specifications:
      Working spectral range:
      - digital photo channel - 0,6 ... 0,9 μm
      - thermal imaging channel - 3,7 ... 4,8 microns
      - survey television channel - 0,4 ... 0,7 microns
      Field of View:
      - in the longitudinal plane - ± 15 degrees
      - in the transverse plane - ± 80 degrees
      Focal length of the lens:
      - digital photo channel - 1750 mm
      - thermal imaging channel - 373 mm
      - Survey television channel continuously variable - 10 ... 100 mm
      Error in issuing angular coordinates of objects - 1 "
      Continuous work time - at least 8 hours
      Operating temperature range - from - 50 degrees С .. up to + 60 degrees С
      Power consumption - 2 kW

      And other radio technical equipment;

      1. 0
        13 December 2016 18: 30
        Judging by the photo - male!
  2. +4
    12 December 2016 10: 05
    I looked (to put it mildly) the offensive of the Ishilovites on Palmyra. Sent for modernization?
    1. +2
      12 December 2016 10: 29
      Somehow a howl rose! Viewed! Missed!
      Well, it’s impossible not to see the movement of such forces, even without satellites and planes.
      And the option of attacking Palmyra itself was obvious.
      Maybe it should have been so? AND?
      1. +4
        12 December 2016 10: 39
        Maybe it should have been so? AND?


        This is the only thing that can justify and save shoulder straps.

        As an option - with the current development of events, direct participation in this other coalition on the face of ours may be freed from many of our obligations to Kerry.

        If this is not so, then it will fly.
      2. +4
        12 December 2016 10: 46
        it was thought that Palmyra had attracted spirits to slaughter, that is, it was a bait for spirits. but seeing what spirits captured the trophies, it is clear that this was no trap, it was a banal failure.
    2. FID
      +11
      12 December 2016 11: 17
      Quote: Elephant
      I looked (to put it mildly) the offensive of the Ishilovites on Palmyra.

      Sorry, this is not his specialization. If you are not too lazy to look at the photo and think a little ...
  3. +2
    12 December 2016 10: 16
    “This aircraft is designed to track air targets, not ground targets.
    Our people were too keen on air defense and air defense and somehow relaxed in relation to the ground situation. Maybe it's worth a little different scout to have in Syria?
    1. +7
      12 December 2016 11: 25
      You're not right. This aircraft is equipped with the OESVR "Fraction" and should be able to conduct reconnaissance on the ground day and night. Real possibilities are different. There are 2 interesting points here. First, the station's performance is in doubt, that is, it does not work. Second, the operation algorithm is outdated and does not cause laughter, but bitterness and disappointment. It turns out that this useless miracle of technology does not work in real time, but writes all information to on-board drives, which are discarded after landing. This scout on the ground does not perform the function of a spotter and cannot transmit the coordinates of the target in real time. They are determined, but not transmitted, but recorded on the information keepers. By the way, this is how all our reconnaissance UAVs work .. I wonder what enemy came up with such an algorithm of work? Moreover, the set and the possibility of transmitting such information exists, but not in the army, but at the factory and in the singular. But there is no benefit from it, it is not coordinated with other devices ...
      WE DO NOT HAVE MODERN BATTLE BATTLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS. And Syria has demonstrated this in full growth ....
      1. 0
        12 December 2016 11: 52
        Quote: okko077
        This aircraft is equipped with the OESVR "Fraction" and should be able to conduct reconnaissance both on the ground day and night

        As well as the aircraft is equipped with a multi-frequency radio complex MRK-411 with radar stations of the side and all-round visibility development TsNIRTI them. Academician A.I. Berg.
        So, what is next? Any equipment on the plane can stand, but if it is used only in the indicated version (reconnaissance of the air situation), then he worked on this task.
        Following your logic, you can agree that our UAVs are not at work, although many of those present watched the filming in these places, and space reconnaissance also just exists.
        After all, this is not the question - can or cannot these means conduct reconnaissance of the ground situation. The question is different - who and at what stage missed all this.
        1. 0
          12 December 2016 12: 07
          Our all UAVs are not at work. You correctly noticed. They make a movie and record on their media. After landing, they extract this information and show it to people like you. And the bearded one has already left for Palmyra. Our UAVs, even if they determine the coordinates of the target in real time, can’t transmit them beyond 50 km, but can only record them in themselves. And after flying along the route in a silent mode, you get the coordinates of mobile objects that had left us that were outdated to nobody ... And you didn’t know why our fire spotters were killed in Syria? .... That’s why the same rake blinked with space intelligence front view only ......
          WE DO NOT HAVE MODERN BATTLE BATTLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
          1. FID
            +10
            12 December 2016 12: 38
            You all write very well, but ... Who is our commander in chief? Who establishes responsibility for certain actions? The Tu-214r is good in itself, but the commander should give tasks (not necessarily the supreme one, if that’s the case), and you should write off the failures on the plane ... you know ...
            1. 0
              12 December 2016 12: 45
              The General Staff is responsible for the fact that we do not know how to wage a modern war. It is he who develops all the concepts and ensures their implementation ..... And we do not even have the concept of creating a Unified Information System. ....
          2. 0
            12 December 2016 12: 54
            Quote: okko077
            They make a movie and record on their media. After landing, they extract this information and show it to people like you.

            Well, nonsense .. the same
            1. +1
              12 December 2016 13: 13
              You even watched this circus yourself. The radius of action is 100 km, and they conduct reconnaissance on their exercises as much as 3 km. And while this information is transmitted to the operator’s control panel. Adult uncles play toys. .. Even 100 km is ridiculous. For little Syria, this is extremely small. What will they put their useless equipment on the shoulders of the bearded? Do you have .... logic .... is everything all right? ...
              1. +1
                12 December 2016 14: 23
                Just do not imagine yourself to be truth in the first instance. Since childhood, I can not stand self-confident boors. Have you ever served in the army, dear, to issue such pearls? Though sometimes you wondered how Caliber and X-101 are being worked out for goals over many thousands of kilometers? What about Lazarus’s mind?
                Did these information systems really help the Americans? Ah, yes ... Iranians in Mosul do not count. And they bombed hospitals just by turning off these systems? And there are more such mistakes than the Russian VKS.
                1. +2
                  12 December 2016 14: 44
                  25 years, as it should be ..... Americans do not fight there, they are present there to share other people's victories ... Calibers hit stationary, previously explored objects .... And to wage a modern war and destroy mobile small-sized targets without contact, we we don’t know how ... And this inability is connected with the stupidity of the top command staff, or rather with a lack of understanding of what and how to do .... Technical capabilities exist, albeit not as we would like, but there is no understanding ...
              2. +1
                12 December 2016 16: 52
                Quote: okko077
                The radius of action is 100 km, and they conduct reconnaissance on their exercises as much as 3 km. And while this information is transmitted to the operator’s control panel.

                And how much do they take the radius on the exercises? They study, but do not pass. This time.
                Two .. Back in the 80s, an unmanned aerial vehicle was part of the Smerch MLRS, to increase the accuracy of defeat at maximum distances .. probably it was also with HD?
                Three. Orlan-10 is now the base drone for our aircraft. It is not very large, therefore it cannot carry everything at once. What is shown in the video is an ordinary overview video camera .. which completely works completely online .. doesn't it? In addition, Orlan can carry: a repeater, an electronic warfare module, an ESU TK module .. and finally your favorite .. with HD .. although this is not so, there is an SDS .. It is needed for covert operations when you need to get a picture in radio silence mode.
          3. +2
            13 December 2016 06: 52
            Our all UAVs are not at work. You correctly noticed. They make a movie and record on their media. After landing, they extract this information and show it to people like you.
            Enough already to bear frank nonsense. Everything there is transmitted in real time and duplicated in parallel to the media
            Our UAVs, even if they determine the coordinates of the target in real time, can’t transmit them beyond 50 km, but can only record them in themselves.
            Those. we savages have not heard about the relay system? Yeah, we’ll write it down.
            And after flying along the route in the unconnected mode, you get the coordinates of the moving mobile objects that were outdated by nobody.
            Those. turn on the brain, open your eyes is not your option? Flight by coordinates?
            UAV itself plays a crosshair on objects? Skynet on the way turns laughing
            That's why they blinked and with space intelligence the same rake only front view ......
            Optoelectronic reconnaissance depends very much on the time of day and the location of the satellite on the orbit path, knowing its orbit path, you can stupidly advance while it flies from the other side of the planet, roughly speaking. These windows are wide enough up to 4-6 hours. And it's not only we have such a problem, "keyholes" also don't keep the entire planet at gunpoint in real time.
            And you did not know why our spotters of fire perish in Syria?
            Because there is a CEP war going on. How exactly did they die do you have data? We know so far only one episode, and also from the words of Kadyrov that scouts died there (it’s just not clear whether these are spotters or agents in the ranks of spirits). If we acted like Americans: stupidly bombing residential areas indiscriminately based only on technical intelligence, then there would be no spotters. And since extreme caution is necessary, it is necessary to carry out pre-reconnaissance in order to understand whether the Basmachi really gathered where to shoot and whether there are civilians and friendly forces there.
            First, the operability of the station is in doubt, i.e. it does not work
            So questionable or not working? Already decide sofa expert. laughing
            Second, the operation algorithm is outdated and causes not laughter, but bitterness and disappointment. It turns out this useless miracle of technology does not work in real time, but writes all the information to the on-board drives, which are decrypted after landing.
            Those. the operators behind the monitors, which are on board and who manage the complex are quite poor, they don’t even have radio stations to talk to the outside world? Stupidly fly themselves do not know what they are scouting. Poor gods ... now let me go to a mean male tear laughing Where did you get these nonsense only? request With regards to the Basmachis: pushing to the city secretly under the guise of refugees or in small groups of 20-30 people each and stretching along the front several tens of kilometers 5000 thousand kilometers is not a problem at all; all the more experience is burrowing into the ground like moles in the burrows of the Basmachis; there’s a huge half of Syria in holes. Who told you that they’re just like a column in the first world’s position?
            1. +1
              13 December 2016 20: 13
              You are not ashamed of such miserable excuses in your comment. You can say anything, but there is no result in Syria. You have a very poor understanding of modern combat information systems ... This is evident in all your examples. Our leaders in the General Staff also think in this.
              The purpose of our disputes in the forum is not to defeat the opponent, but to establish the truth. I, like many, preach a technical approach in all matters. As it should be, I know, but as it is, I actually see the results and a thorough analysis of open sources of information, but this is enough to make a conclusion about a serious failure in the use of modern information technologies in the army. We don’t have the simplest combat ligaments using UAVs and processing information from them for target designation of striking means in real time. We can’t even dream of using not only global, but even local information systems .....
              1. 0
                14 December 2016 16: 45
                You are not ashamed of such miserable excuses in your comment.

                I don’t, especially since it’s not an excuse, but an objective assessment. Aren't you ashamed of the frankly incompetent assessment of the state of various systems that you only know from Wiki about and have seen a maximum in the pictures?
                You have a very poor understanding of modern combat information systems ...
                Well, where am I to you with my two highest technicals in this area)))
                This is evident in all of your examples.
                These are examples for ordinary people who are a little able to think logically. Give then technical if in the subject (just not blah ... blah ...). For example, about the OESVR "Fraction", what's wrong with it? We are discussing.
                This is also the thought of our leaders in the General Staff.
                Well, yes, our guys from the Moscow Region are not far, the developers (this is a stone from you as well) are ignorant and only you are Dartanyan))) Maybe tell us, wise and wretched, why did the FSC program bend? Is a similar development developing here? It's a shame you understand ...
                The purpose of our forum disputes is not to defeat the opponent, but to establish the truth
                The truth? Ahah))) About a top-secret reconnaissance aircraft? Is it the very fact that there are not even pictures of the RM operators? We will speculate on coffee grounds or do you make up your own unfounded conclusions?
                As it should be, I know
                Oh oh)))
                but as I actually see
                You see what two people see the same thing, but at the exit they have two opposite opinions, although in reality none of them is right. It is impossible to conclude whether the system works or not only according to newspaper headlines and the actions of the people who manage this system.
                according to the results and a thorough analysis of open sources of information.
                The fact of the matter is that through open sources everything is mixed up and it makes no sense to analyze them (at least to you a simple sofa expert).
                We do not have the simplest combat ligaments using UAVs and processing information from them for target designation of strike means in real time.
                We have such systems and they are being tested, including in Syria (before that, only in exercises).
                And about the use of not only global
                No one has them (or rather, not yet ...)
                , and even local information systems do not even have to dream .....
                That's right, do not dream, they have already been created and even are in trial operation in the army. I propose to dream that ESU TK will fully work.
  4. +3
    12 December 2016 10: 17
    Tu-214P reconnaissance aircraft returned from Syria

    I could not cope with the task, 4000 militants on technology did not find on the outskirts of Palmyra.
    1. +12
      12 December 2016 10: 20
      Quote: Kozliu
      Tu-214P reconnaissance aircraft returned from Syria

      I could not cope with the task, 4000 militants on technology did not find on the outskirts of Palmyra.

      Next time you fly and handle it.
      1. +4
        12 December 2016 10: 51
        This couch liberal general with his stump in the toilet can not cope laughing they have it all just. on the couch then. # ALL-PROPALOPUTINSIL belay here is their motto
        1. +3
          12 December 2016 15: 05
          Quote: vkl.47
          This couch liberal general with his stump in the toilet can not cope laughing they have it all just. on the couch then. # ALL-PROPALOPUTINSIL belay here is their motto

          There is more harm from Uryakalka than from All-Propeller, you Uryakalki will always find an excuse for the ignorance of your own power and the obvious backwardness of domestic critical weapon technologies. Only now, until what point are you ready to justify them ... until another hitler reaches Moscow?
    2. +3
      12 December 2016 11: 47
      Quote: Kozliu
      I could not cope with the task, 4000 militants on technology did not find on the outskirts of Palmyra.

      And if he managed and discovered. Do you propose to drop everything in Aleppo, withdraw troops from there and transfer them to Palmyra? Where so many people to get? Assad does not have a two-million army to fight on three or four fronts.
      1. +4
        12 December 2016 15: 21
        Quote: Koshak
        Quote: Kozliu
        I could not cope with the task, 4000 militants on technology did not find on the outskirts of Palmyra.

        And if he managed and discovered. Do you propose to drop everything in Aleppo, withdraw troops from there and transfer them to Palmyra? Where so many people to get? Assad does not have a two-million army to fight on three or four fronts.

        Desert - TIR. for attack aircraft.
        ISIS infantry equipment in the open desert - TARGETS for attack helicopters, unless of course these helicopters are full-fledged combat vehicles with high-quality thermal imagers, accurate sighting system, powerful weapons and large ammunition ...
        The first Iraq war. Apache attack helicopters burned hundreds of Iraqi tanks in the desert ... in fact, they set up Hell in defenseless equipment and infantry in the desert.
        In our case, the ISIS throw to Palmyra, this Hell, the militants should have arranged 20 MI-28 and KA-52 helicopters, but this did not happen.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +11
    12 December 2016 10: 28
    Looking at the photo card ....? Neither the Turks nor the Bulgarians ever opened their air zones for us. We continue to fly through Iran and Iraq. And we let them "tomatoes", and we will lay a gas pipe. We are Russians! ... Generous!
    1. +5
      12 December 2016 11: 12
      You can still understand their citrus, but Turkish tomatoes, (at the expense of ours) - in any case, idiocy.
  8. +1
    12 December 2016 10: 32
    Yes, it seems in vain he flew from there ...
  9. 0
    12 December 2016 13: 00
    He flew, flew, and Palmyra about .. were?
    1. +2
      12 December 2016 13: 28
      Quote: senima56
      Palmyra pro..raly

      Yeah, yeah! About .. if.
      Hang yourself now!
    2. 0
      12 December 2016 15: 02
      Quote: senima56
      and Palmyra about .. ate?

      And what are the Scandinavians concerned about? Now there is no Russian ban on the promotion of husband and bestiality? So this is your favorite tolerance! How are you doing your own Arab? Have you fed them? Are you drunk to drink them? Have you already lost your women? Refugees should be cared for and cherished! They feel bad in the Arctic! And forget about Palmyra. There, adult independent uncles play serious games. And don’t skimp, let ... get up! See that the barmalei fit in tightly. How will they get out now?
  10. 0
    14 December 2016 17: 29
    Here are all the grammarians, uvile-not seen in Palmyra ... maybe I saw. if on earth they’re not ready to defend, then IG cannot be stopped. Judging by the fact that 80% of the civilians were evacuated, they knew in advance. And the plane is valid. Radar allows you to even find underground tunnels ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"