Military Review

Ideology. TV against the refrigerator

97
Ideology. TV against the refrigerator



There was such a funny expression: TV against the refrigerator. And the answer was implied, therefore, the question is ironic: of course, an empty stomach will inevitably triumph over propaganda campaigns from the screen. And everyone seems to be clear and understandable, and there seems to be nothing to argue about here.

That is why politicians, one way or another, are advised to get acquainted with economic theory. Because if it seems to you that you do not use in your activity no economic theory, then some kind of you all use one. This is simple not are aware of. The same trouble with ideology. No major political or even economic activity is possible. without ideology.

After 91, it seemed to us that it was possible, but it was an illusion. The rejection of communist ideology did not mean freedom. Even the medieval illiterate peasant in the field was not free from ideology. Citizens any States can not be free from it. It does not happen. When we say that we abandon ideology, it looks quite funny. The main thing, say, money? Oh well.

All история the foreign policy of the Russian Federation after 91, refutes this bold theory. We, as if abandoning the very “communist” ideology, decided to build relations with our neighbors solely on the principles of mutual benefit, because any chatlanin will understand that one hundred bucks is better than ten “wooden” ones. Well at least us it was absolutely clear. But for some reason we didn’t meet any understanding among our neighbors.

No, wait, you say, they have a market and democracy, and we have a market and democracy, and the two powers with McDonald's toilets in the capitals will never mate on the battlefield. Well, in theory, yes, but the same Yugoslavia sanctified by Ronald Macdonald was smashed up by the adepts of the Big Macs. Again, the theory does not work.

You see, to fight without ideology (like building a state) is absolutely impossible. Because it is ideology that explains to us why those who should be killed should be killed. No other way. After all, we are all good, law-abiding citizens. And nothing funny: remember Aleppo, from our point of view - this is the fight against terrorism, from the point of view of the Western media - “war crimes”.

And now there is such a paradoxical situation, when it suddenly turned out that the ideology is just there, and it is “universal”, and even very, very correct. And it is the only one, and there are no others, nor can there be. So it goes. To enumerate what the essence of this “most wonderful” ideology is is absolutely pointless: we have heard this already thousands of times. In the ears imposed.

And, it is clear that this ideology denies that it is an ideology, and thus denies the right to the existence of some other ideologies. Approximately how Western politicians say that the era of "spheres of influence" has passed. Yeah, the whole planet should be in their sphere of influence. That's why it passed. NATO absolutely openly declares its readiness to act anywhere in the world. A sort of global security provider. But Russia is not threatened in any way. This is what they also say.

You see, what is the ficus of ideology? It makes people see events in a certain light and at a certain angle. There is a Marxist ideology: the bourgeois exploit the proletarians. There is the Nazi: the superior race / inferior race. There is an Islamic one: there is no God but God ... Yes, there are many of them. To challenge and discuss / condemn them is useless. Or you are "inside" or "outside."

European is confident that NATO ensures its security and that good. He lives in the right democratic country. And the security of this “right” country is ensured by the right NATO bloc - everything is very good, healthy and wonderful. From his point of view. And he does not see any problems here. And do not see. As long as the average European is doing well and well, he will not notice any problems and will not experience any moral torments.

And this is not "disgusting." They have such an ideology. While Gaddafi was being bombed, all eurochelles didn’t give a damn about the suffering of the Libyans, but when refugees flooded from the African coast ... It was then that they broke through. And these people want to: “speak firmly with the Kremlin.” In fact, they are not magic "superheroes", ordinary inhabitants. But they have an ideology.

That is why the adventures in Syria and Ukraine no emotions do not cause them. There is an ideology that correctly explains all this, and being a “nonconformist” is unprofitable. Here we are frankly surprised by the behavior of Europeans against the background of refugees and terrorists “already at your house” - the support of some “Syrian oppositionists” and sanctions against Russia to the bitter end. Meanwhile, everything is logical and correct, according to their ideology. Ideologies as a belief system and political preferences.

And by the way, yes, they seem to have two ideologies: one for export, the other for its own. Those in Russia who actively reproach the West for "immorality and not following their own principles," just do not take this into account. It's like any international corporation has a set of widely proclaimed official goals, but there is a real policy. And between them often have little in common.

The problem of Russia of the last decades is just in the underestimation, and often ignoring the "ideological moments". It seems to us that ideology is a thing of the past, it seems to us that everything is clear to everyone. It seemed to us that everything can and should be solved "through money." Life has proved the inadequacy of such conclusions.

This is about how to argue that, they say, honest people do not need laws or expensive lawyers. Yeah, only they need a prosecutor. At the moment (as a result of European integration), the standard of living in Ukraine has fallen two to three times, crime has increased three times, to four. Theoretically, Ukrainians should have been disappointed in Europe and turned to the East. Based on the logic of the "refrigerator". The stomach is not fooled!

Nothing of the kind! And even in Byelorussia, all Ukrainian “insinuations” are perceived somehow strangely. Europeans and Americans are reforming and reformatting Ukraine, and for some reason, Belarusians have complaints about Russians ... It’s such an ideology. It makes you see things not as they are.

The problems of relations between Russia and Belarus lie in the ideological field. And one should not be surprised: there were serious ideological contradictions between the British Empire and the United States during WWII (their coverage is beyond the scope of this article), the same contradictions were between the regimes of Hitler and Mussolini. Although for us the difference is insignificant.

Until a certain point, these contradictions were stolen, but after 08.08.08 it got to the surface. Whether we like it or not, Belarusians see themselves in Europe. With this we must accept. It just happened that once we saw ourselves in Europe. We have over time passed, due to a certain set of circumstances. Belarusians do not. Whether we like it or not, Belarusian young people are looking in the direction of Europe, and not in the direction of Russia. The chase, she is.

Of course, here you can argue a lot of things at once. First of all, Belarusians are Russians, for a German or a Frenchman this is exactly the case, and the attitude towards them will always be appropriate - precisely as “Russians”, that is, people of the fifth grade. Get away from this is impossible in any way. Europeans are inborn nationalists. And the gradation of nations in each country is different and very tough. So for most northern Europeans, Russians (Belarusians) are even worse than blacks and Arabs in the form of refugees. That is why our emigrants often defiantly despise Russia (it’s bad to adapt to the environment where being Russian is).

That is, it seems that Russians (Belarusians) are quite Northern Europeans with a high cultural and educational level. But we think so. Europeans think otherwise. In the case of European integration, Belarusians will have to play according to the rules of Europe, and not based on their own ideas about them. So when Belarusians declare that: “We are not Russians, we are Belarusians”. I want to ask to meet: "And who cares?"

Secondly, the economy of Belarus is closely tied precisely to Russia and is of a very specific nature: at the entrance there are cheap energy resources, at the output goods that can only be sold to Russia. With European integration, such an economy will die immediately and the outright Bangladesh will begin.

Yes, a lot of things can be objected, but the Belarusian youth is not interested in it categorically. They want to "try", and Russia is unattractive for them. Ideology, however. It is somehow not customary to say (for reasons of political correctness) that most people are not very intelligent and educated, and even those who are intelligent and educated are easily manipulated. That's it for them and invented ideology. People are actively brainwashed, and they believe, even if it is absurd.

For some reason, we always proceed from the assumption that an ordinary citizen can add up “two plus two” and understand what is good and what is bad. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Mr. Kara-Murza wrote a lot about this (“Manipulation of consciousness”). An ordinary person is easily manipulated, as, incidentally, a crowd of ordinary citizens. And, by the way, the basis of Western states is not just “the market and democracy”, but the skillful manipulation of the consciousness of their own citizens.

True, they are not interested in principle: Sochi-2014 was an absolutely positive event, but from the very beginning it was doused with mud, and then a coup in Kiev parallel to the Olympiad was organized. Somehow Putin did not invest in the “war in Ukraine”, but in a completely different way of developing relations. After all, it was possible not to give money to Yanukovych, to close the Russian market for Ukraine and the Ukrainians, to support the radicals, to push the country into the chaos of civil war, and then cynically to take the Crimea.

“But that’s exactly what happened!” - you will say, but the trick is that the scenario of the destruction of Ukraine was prepared, financed and launched by no means Putin. Putin, until the last second, actively fought против "Return of the Crimea" and for the preservation of Ukrainian statehood. But now you can’t prove it to anyone. Those people who destroyed the Ukrainian state on two Maidan, insist that Putin attacked Ukraine.

Notice that none of those who talkatively talk about “Russia's aggression” categorically do not want to discuss the topic of two Maidans. It does not fit into the ideologically correct picture. Twice foreigners by force changed the power in Ukraine. What is sovereignty here? That's the plus of ideology, that it forces citizens to turn a blind eye to the obvious facts. Absolutely no one in Europe, in Ukraine, in Belarus, is embarrassed by the fact that the government in Kiev is frankly puppet.

Nobody notices this. Russian notice, the Chinese, by the way, notice, but in general lepotta. No one even stutters about the return of sovereignty to Ukraine. That is a situation when the main politician in the country - the US ambassador seems to all quite normal. The country is occupied, the country is being robbed (under the cover of a puppet government), Ukrainians are openly killed. But even in Minsk nobody sees this. See only "Putin's aggression."

If we compare the level and quality of life in the neighboring regions of Russia and Ukraine, then there will be no limit to surprise. At one time, all interested parties actively compared the standard of living in the Federal Republic of Germany and the GDR. And they made political conclusions: “There is Germany and there, Germany, there are Germans and there are Germans. But what a difference! Conclusion: socialism is ineffective! ”But nobody is in a hurry to apply the same logic along the Kiev-Moscow or Moscow-Minsk line. It's completely different here, you can not compare ...

Why not? In today's Germany, living standards are higher than in Russia, and this is very actively used in various discussions (for some reason not the Germans). But to compare Russia with Poland, Spain or Portugal in terms of living standards is no longer so interesting. That does not compare. Why - it is not clear. Compare with Ukraine? Not interesting at all! Therefore - "ignore"! But if the people of Kiev lived better than the Muscovites, we would have ears in all our ears ... Today Ukrainians are telling us about that ... that the Germans live better than the Russians ... It would seem, what does Ukraine have to do with it?

So the theme of "standard of living", it is so ... specific. If it is profitable to mention it - it is mentioned and actively “forsat”, if it is not profitable ... they put it in “ignore”. Just do not consider in any way. And it would be okay only journalists / politicians / propagandists - that would be understandable. "The oldest profession" - they are the oldest. But ordinary Ukrainians / Belarusians do not see no advantages in the “Russian model”. They just have “oil and gas” ...

Germany and the GDR, by the way, also could not be directly compared for various reasons, but whom did it bother you? Compare and draw conclusions. On the "lost economic competition." AND all it seemed correct and logical. Ideology, gentlemen, it is everywhere. By the way, in the USSR the standard of living was no worse than in the countries of Southern Europe (if we compare all the parameters), but who cares? Only store counters were compared.

In fact, the USSR simply did not know how to “sell” properly. Propaganda was frankly miserable. And now we know about the USA and Europe much more. And we treat them much calmer. Only this knowledge is bought at a very high price. Moreover, the Americans themselves openly admitted in Soviet times that a poor person lives in Cuba in something better than in the United States. But who is with us then could understand the meaning of this phrase? Why did the Americans win the Cold War? One of the reasons: building communism is difficult and expensive, and Hollywood is much cheaper.

As the sad post-Soviet practice shows, “a fairy tale and a dream” even for adults can happen more importantthan something real and tangible. And any schemer will confirm this to you. People are "led." The richest Soviet republic is Georgia. One of the poorest post-Soviet republics is also Georgia. That is the most drastic decline in the standard of living occurred in Georgia.

But it is the Georgians who are very pro-American and anti-Russian. Speak "TV against the refrigerator"? Oh well. In principle, the exchange of political loyalty against economic assistance is interesting to Russia was already in 0-e. However, it did not work anywhere. That is, people were very willing to take money, but Hollywood and California preferred to love.

The author was most seriously impressed by the “Vakhtang Kikabidze phenomenon”: the man was a star of the all-Union scale, swam in fame, was very popular and loved in Russia. It all ended with an open call: to destroy "this country." Literally shock. And if you were born a man in a poor / independent Georgia - what would he have become? Would you sing in restaurants? And he said it is not at a tender age. It seems that a person lived, saw a lot, some wisdom must come ...

It seems that “filling other people's refrigerators” is not the best strategy. It did not work either in the "Ukrainian refrigerator" or in Georgian. People can not see their obvious benefits or do not want to. So, oddly enough, serious ideological propaganda work is necessary. And you thought the USSR was gone and everything died with him?

Ideology and propaganda were actively used and were brought to a very refined level during the times of Augustus, the emperor of Rome and Shi Huang-di, the emperor of China. Ordinary people are not able to add two plus two, it does not matter if they buy or sell. They are waiting for ready-made answers, so no need to "spit and laugh."

“Telling the truth” is not a strategy. For example, ten years ago the Russians treated the Ukrainians and the Georgians very well, considered them their own and were ready to help in every way. And it is true. Remind me how it ended? People are easily manipulated and programmed. To count on their "rationality and independence in decision making" is quite naive.

And do not tell fairy tales that ordinary Lithuanians, Georgians, Ukrainians crave friendship with Russia and only the evil ruling puppets of the State Department prevent this. Beautiful, but not true. War today is fought not only in the military or economic sphere. The sphere of propaganda is no less important; ideological questions are no less important.

Why precisely "ideological"? The fact is that when discussing the situation in Europe and Russian politics with representatives of Europe, they very often declare: we do not understand you. Not in the sense of language, but in the sense of general. It is because within their ideology our actions look absurd and criminal. And they worked on their ideology for themselves and for themselves. Houston, we got a problem.

In Russia, it is customary to be offended by Russophobia and anti-Russian propaganda. Allegedly, this is not good. This is not "bad" - this is war. Long, multistage military operation. Some kind of morality is completely absent. They say that a nuclear conflict is now impossible. Well, who knows, but the information war is already in full swing.

For some reason, they like to hysterically: “they are waging an information war against us!” And they are waging an ideological war too. And they didn't stop at 1991. And now what? We must not be offended, but act in accordance with reality. It is just necessary, step by step, to abandon the logic of “cooperation” and move on to the logic of “confrontation”. No matter how insulting, but this is the case. Information pressure on Russia will increase. If not for nuclear weapons, the conflict long I would have already decided on the battlefields, but due to the presence of the SNF in Russia, we have a "storm in the informational glass." And this is not an “accident”, it is a conscious decision of the Western elites.

That is, Russia needs an information strategy designed for confrontational conditions. It is a strategy and precisely confrontational. It would be different, but, as we see, it did not work out. As already mentioned, even such a “super-positive” event as the Olympics in Sochi became a negative informational occasion. There, they say, too much money was spent / stolen. Listen - this is our money, what do you want? What is your concern? We want and spend.

No, bad everything is bad ... That Pussy Rayot, the scandal with the Russian Olympians ... This is a war. Informational. And yet the war. And to count on a fair, adequate attitude is not necessary by definition. Our success in engineering or economics is absolutely not interesting to anyone in the West. Non-rated topic.

It should be understood that we are not dealing with some “free-thinking citizens”, but with a deeply ideological system, to prove something which is fundamentally useless. So there will be a military confrontation in Europe (especially in the Baltic and Black Sea basins), and, most importantly, informational / ideological. That is, as it were, in the field of information, not so much confrontation as war.

And in a war, it is somehow decided to fight, not “seek justice.” And yes, in Ukraine, the TV won, won with a crushing score. "We do not need fat, we have an angel shining, we do not need bread, come on tires ..."

The foregoing does not imply that you have to start hysteria, lie, introduce censorship and engage in psaking. This is just impossible to do. But the "winter" will be long, and we must seriously prepare for this.

Author:
Articles from this series:
Americans Not stupid
Purse with legs
97 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 14 December 2016 05: 54
    +8
    Ideology. TV against the refrigerator
    I’ll clarify. Telly place in the trash. Only compic is the source of information.
    1. anEkeName
      anEkeName 14 December 2016 06: 16
      +14
      For me, "compic" is the same "TV", only personal with millions of channels. Journalists and publicists do not produce material goods, therefore, they will write what the sponsor or advertiser tells them. Sharper topics of publications => wider audience => more information resource earns. And if there is an opportunity to comment on publications - a multiple increase in attendance.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 06: 24
        +5
        Quote: anEkeName
        "Kompik" is the same "TV set", only personal.

        No, no, nifiga you beat up. My computer was in the 91 year.
        1. anEkeName
          anEkeName 14 December 2016 06: 30
          +1
          Of course, I mean a "comp" with internet access. Without "dickhead".
          1. Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 06: 40
            +2
            No, I had a "spectrum". I played toys on it. laughing
          2. Stanislas
            Stanislas 14 December 2016 12: 16
            +1
            Quote: anEkeName
            I mean "comp" with internet access
            In 91 was like that with me.
            I don’t remember only, a memory expansion module up to 1 kb was inserted into the 2 or 640 slot (I went to the Krivoy Rog factory for it), and this is DOS, and dos is almost the Internet (there was no network).
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 12: 25
              +2
              I bought a student. Exactly before the GKChP. It seems the cooperators let out. Analog Spectrum.
      2. Titsen
        Titsen 14 December 2016 07: 15
        +5
        Quote: anEkeName
        Journalists and publicists do not produce material wealth, therefore, they will write what the sponsor or advertiser will tell them.


        You are right, of course.

        But the average person should be able to understand what is good and what is bad.

        A plus article - ideology above all!
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 14 December 2016 08: 59
          +4
          But the average person should be able to understand what is good and what is bad.
          What for?
    2. Finches
      Finches 14 December 2016 08: 44
      +5
      I would put it using the concepts of Marxist theories - Starting in '91 we only built a superstructure, forgetting about the basis, which is not good! A house without a solid foundation will collapse sooner or later, how many props it does not support ....
      1. PHANTOM-AS
        PHANTOM-AS 14 December 2016 09: 42
        +10
        Quote: Finches
        I would put it using the concepts of Marxist theories -

        Eugene, Hello hi I am shocked by the fact that you turned to Marxism laughing just kidding laughing
        Quote: Finches
        Starting in '91, we only built a superstructure, forgetting about the basis, which is not good!

        And what kind of basis can the powerful bourgeoisie bring under the superstructure built by them for 25 years?
        If they tell the truth about their goals, the revolution will happen the next day.
        On the contrary, these figures in every possible way keep silent about what they are building and into what "bright", mlyn, the future they are leading us, we will not hear this anywhere.
        They have no ideology, except to steal, enrich yourself, man to man is a wolf, I’m a boy servant, and these theses in Russia will not work for most people.
        In addition, the economic situation in the country is bad, that's why a furious tele-processing of the population is underway and the fear of the authorities before the victory of the refrigerator over the zombodroscope is very high.
        Quote: Finches
        A house without a solid foundation will collapse sooner or later, how many supports do not support it ....

        Quote: Finches
        A house without a solid foundation will collapse sooner or later, how many supports do not support it ....

        You are five for this phrase! Of course collapses can be no doubt yes
        1. Finches
          Finches 14 December 2016 09: 57
          +8
          Good afternoon! hi

          If those in power, especially those from the economic bloc of the Government, were not too lazy to study the works of Marx, they would do much less stupid things in the economy, and if the powers that be in the executive bloc of the state read Lenin’s works carefully, then they would think more about the public good and social justice, than about personal welfare, understanding what it could lead to ... But nobody wants to read anything from those in power - they live one day, and some frankly - after us even later!
          And the television is opium for the people and the computer is opium .. because if the hamster is not zombied by Kiselev, but he has an active civic position, then he is going to arrange a revolution not on the street, but on Facebook and the third participant in this frenzy is the church, with his unshakable postulate that power is from God, and patience is a godly work ... That's how we live!
          1. PHANTOM-AS
            PHANTOM-AS 14 December 2016 10: 14
            +5
            Quote: Finches
            Governments were not too lazy to study the works of Marx, then they would do much less stupid things in the economy, and if the authorities of the executive bloc of the state read Lenin’s works carefully, then they would think more about the public good and social justice than about the personal good, understanding what it can lead to

            The fact of the matter is that most of them not only read, but studied objectively the works of Marx and Lenin, and therefore they act on the contrary. Unfortunately, the majority of the population did not read this, otherwise a social explosion would have occurred a long time ago.
            And the current leaders had one task to dislodge the Marxist-Leninist ideology, as the platform of the communist system.
            For the people these books are taboo, try now to find the works of Marx, Lenin, Stalin on paper.
            1. Finches
              Finches 14 December 2016 10: 19
              +4
              Those who played the role in the late 80s and early 90s definitely studied, but the generation of majors that came in the 2000s only read their highs and highs like them on Facebook! The impression, of course, is deprived of objectivity, but when you listen to the statements of the governor of the Oryol region about the journey of Ivan the Terrible with his sick son from Moscow to St. Petersburg or Poklonskaya's nonsense, that is exactly the impression!
              1. PHANTOM-AS
                PHANTOM-AS 14 December 2016 10: 36
                +9
                Quote: Finches
                but when you listen to the statements of the governor of the Oryol region about the journey of Ivan the Terrible with his sick son from Moscow to St. Petersburg or Poklonskaya's nonsense, it is precisely this impression that develops!

                So they have prepared and are preparing for themselves a "worthy" disobedient change as executors of the will of the priests.
                One portrait of a little niche on the procession of the Immortal Regiment on Victory Day is worth it! pah, Mlyn., there are no limits to idiocy
                1. Finches
                  Finches 14 December 2016 10: 38
                  +2
                  What are we talking about! hi
                2. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 10: 40
                  +6
                  Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                  no limits to idiocy

                  So they do not consider themselves idiots. They keep us for idiots.
                  1. PHANTOM-AS
                    PHANTOM-AS 14 December 2016 10: 49
                    +3
                    Quote: Mordvin 3
                    So they do not consider themselves idiots. They keep us for idiots.

                    Our task is to prove the opposite to them and to give earrings to all sisters!
                  2. Vz.58
                    Vz.58 14 December 2016 11: 07
                    +2
                    Menyazdesnet, and you look http://politwar.ru/genialnyj-shtab-v-gody-vojny.h
                    tml
                    1. Mordvin 3
                      Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 11: 12
                      +3
                      Quote: Vz.58
                      Menyazetet, and you look

                      Amen is also not here. to read-write wassat
                      1. Vz.58
                        Vz.58 14 December 2016 12: 06
                        +2
                        Now the expressions "meenyazdesnet" and "ichtamnet" are used to refer to Russian troops in Syria
      2. Stanislas
        Stanislas 14 December 2016 14: 04
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        Starting from the year 91 we only built a superstructure, forgetting about the basis
        Ideology is the basis on which the economy develops (or does not develop). There used to be a taboo, an ideological ban on innovations, they have not existed for tens of thousands of years, and the idea of ​​progress has appeared - here it has come across from every gap. Marx, alas, put everything on this question (Hegel, at least) upside down (assuming that ideas were in it), but on his hands.
  2. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 14 December 2016 06: 15
    +13
    It’s a talent to expose obvious things with an absurd syllable. laughing

    But ideology, nevertheless, happens correct. No matter where you are - inside or outside.

    Correct Ideology - real.

    The world revolution is nonsense (no offense to the apostles of communism be said).
    World democracy is nonsense.
    But the struggle of states with each other is a reality! Because states are selfish entities.
    The victory of large states over small unviable ones is a reality (as if the Balts did not puff up).
    The plan will defeat the market - nonsense.
    The market will defeat the plan - nonsense.
    The symbiosis of market and planning principles is a reality.
    Private traders are more effective than the state - delirium (only in small artisanal production; you will be left without missiles).
    The state is more effective than the private trader - delirium (you will be left without toilet paper and socks).
    Marriage - the union of a man and a woman - this follows from the school textbook of anatomy and from all world religions; this is reality!
    And so on.

    An ideology based on reality is correct.
    1. anEkeName
      anEkeName 14 December 2016 06: 24
      +7
      Mature views of an adult.
    2. avia1991
      avia1991 14 December 2016 08: 13
      +4
      Quote: Gormengast
      Reality Based Ideology - Right

      Well, go and tell the right thing to the western man in the street! It will be interesting to see WHERE he sends you - we’ll probably find out something new laughing
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 14 December 2016 09: 12
        +1
        Hi Seryoga!
        Quote: avia1991
        Well, go and tell the right thing to the western man in the street!
        Why go so far - there is an example closer.
        1. avia1991
          avia1991 14 December 2016 09: 34
          +2
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Why go so far - there is an example closer

          laughing !
          Hi, Igor! hi drinks
          Well, in this case, we are talking about international relations, and about the war against Russia! That is why I send "there" wink
  3. EvgNik
    EvgNik 14 December 2016 06: 20
    +13
    While Gaddafi was bombed, all Euro-hamsters did not give a damn about the suffering of the Libyans, but when refugees poured from the African coast ...

    Is it not so with us? Here we have in the Urals - a mixture of different nationalities. There are Russians, Tatars, Bashkirs, Udmurts, Germans - but who only! However, we live in peace, and no one cares about the nationality of the neighbor. And now there are immigrants from the former republics, in large numbers, for some reason with Russian passports. But with its own culture. Maybe when they fit into our reality, assimilate, maybe ... But we do not like it actively.
    For some reason, they like to be hysterical at the same time: “an information war is being waged against us!”

    The war is going on against the Russian people, this is genocide, you cannot call it otherwise. Everything else is secondary.
    1. Kristen
      Kristen 14 December 2016 20: 05
      +1
      That's the problem that people come without a sense of homeland in the soul. And you listen to them and draw the wrong conclusions about the indigenous peoples where they came from. If a person does not value his homeland, why would he cherish a stranger.
      1. EvgNik
        EvgNik 15 December 2016 06: 06
        +1
        Quote: Kristen
        And you listen to them and draw the wrong conclusions about the indigenous peoples where they came from

        We don’t listen to them because they don’t communicate with us. Communicate with each other. In your own language. They live in my porch - neither hello nor goodbye. Children in school already have communication.
        1. Kristen
          Kristen 15 December 2016 14: 14
          0
          This is precisely what they are characterized by their reluctance to make contact. Sam of Sergiev Posad, who came from a lot of friends but the flag is such, our share of guest workers earn on a mortgage.
          1. avia1991
            avia1991 15 December 2016 22: 20
            +1
            Quote: Kristen
            This is precisely their characteristic of unwillingness to contact

            Not this characterizes them. They are characterized by a reluctance to comply with OUR RUSSIAN LAWS, and a desire to impose their values ​​on everyone around them!
            And sheer rudeness and rudeness, they should be in the majority - and sheep’s bleating, with cries of insulting national feelings, as soon as you put it firmly in place!
            How teachers with these "Russians", God forgive me, get it - cannot be described!
  4. raid14
    raid14 14 December 2016 06: 34
    +4
    The population is ruled by the slogan "Bread and circuses", so that due to the lack of "correct" ideology, faith in a bright future, in the current conditions the refrigerator is in the first place, the TV is in the second.
    To prevent mass protests and appearances, the TV is trying to defeat the refrigerator. For example:
    Danilova A. A. Word manipulation in the media
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 09: 23
      +1
      in the current conditions, the refrigerator comes first, the TV comes second


      The Ukrainian example does NOT confirm your theory, alas.
      1. raid14
        raid14 14 December 2016 11: 03
        0
        Is it like that?
        There is a different reality and everything works differently.
        There the TV defeated the refrigerator, now the refrigerator takes over the TV.
        There was a substitution of concepts upside down, look from this position and everything will become clear.
  5. ImPerts
    ImPerts 14 December 2016 06: 37
    +1
    Why not give it a try? And then bargain for the opportunity to return everything as a bulo?
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 06: 56
      +8
      Quote: ImPerts
      Why not give it a try?

      Do you know that in the Roman Empire slaves were not allowed to study history, sociology, and other cultural sciences? , it is
      1. ImPerts
        ImPerts 14 December 2016 07: 40
        0
        The home teachers in Roman families were slaves and they communicated with other slaves.
        I do not consider myself a patrician.
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 08: 06
          +3
          Quote: ImPerts
          Home teachers in Roman families were slaves

          And, by the way, slaves were allowed to study mathematics and geometry. Because how to build them forced.
          1. ImPerts
            ImPerts 14 December 2016 09: 16
            0
            Not forbidden. But not forced.
            But not forbidden.
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 09: 22
              +2
              Quote: ImPerts
              But not forced.

              I mean, slaves usually built (sorry for tongue-tied). request
  6. Explore
    Explore 14 December 2016 07: 12
    +1
    https://yandex.ru/clck/redir/V3Y0P+MO/zUp7n9WDxXf
    6YiE2kT8Sb5STTPuAKSJsGJD44gNh+BrsNQBQNivcFBTdata=
    RSk6i9ZKXz4tybEbMKvkqn2oQg8uhhFUuuwlAnBfF49X7zSuY
    jcEpq7UqHGy1edPClNPWan%2FzKQ4BokMT%2B307CjGpqqXh0
    VPVrZfRz7dFe%2FJ7K%2FDAS86bO4b2FMcVIbbjHrfLjxDSPx
    6UcGZyhpdOAl9wd8SpQfhw1BRHaLQb1HdIDQ6vbec%2BxsyUQ
    8GbLEY&b64e=1&sign=ccfca2547c1e5c097f9a3b84e164a4
    df & keyno = 0 Military aircraft in the sky over Manhattan scared network users
  7. victorsh
    victorsh 14 December 2016 07: 58
    +2
    There is a Marxist ideology: the bourgeois exploit the proletarians. There is a Nazi: higher race / lower race. There is Islamic: there is no God but God ... Yes, there are many
    Interestingly, what is the ideology of some of our officials sitting on the Olympus of power? The FBI-Federation of Bobsleigh of Russia (su-i) refused to hold the 2017 World Cup in Sochi in order to stop the discord in this federation (not literally, but in the subject) because. some states threatened not to participate in this World Cup! And now imagine the situation in 1980. The USSR WILL NOT hold the Olympics in Moscow because some "democratic" states have announced a boycott of this Olympics! Personally, I'm in SHOCK!
    1. PHANTOM-AS
      PHANTOM-AS 14 December 2016 10: 05
      +4
      Quote: victorsh
      Interesting. And what is the ideology of some of our officials sitting on Olympus authorities?

      They, almost all have one ideology, money, and the country and the people are a cash cow.
      Slepakov sings with humor, but it's true.
  8. avia1991
    avia1991 14 December 2016 08: 07
    +4
    Strong! good I like it! But with this:
    Russia needs an information strategy designed for the conditions of confrontation.
    I agree to all 100! ..
    The problem is that for this we will have to break not only the propaganda system - we will have to break our own value system! We've got used to it, you know, that Truth is the most important thing. And in the proposed version, it will be necessary to actively use Lies, falsification of facts, double standards .. without this, the consciousness of an ideologized Western man in the street cannot be broken! .. In our domestic politics, our politicians (sorry for the tautology) actively use these principles - the electorate must somehow "within" keep. But against the West, a strategy is needed that is more powerful than "homework" - for a Russian person, in contrast to a well-fed Western man in the street, is, in my opinion, more trusting, and he’s ready to elevate the central authority above Olympus, it only needs to sprinkle ash on her head slightly and repent of some little things wassat
    What I absolutely agree with the author is that "in war - as in war": there is an outright enemy, and there is a hidden one, and we must fight against them! .. And not engage in exhortations, as we basically do. hi
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 09: 32
      0
      it will be necessary to actively use Lies, juggling facts, double standards


      Everything is not as simple as it seems. Frankly it’s not worth lying.
      1. avia1991
        avia1991 14 December 2016 22: 04
        +1
        Quote: Olezhek
        Everything is not as simple as it seems. Frankly it’s not worth lying.

        And no one offers. And no one promised it would be easy.
        This weapon has long been successfully used by our own homegrown liberals: a small lie, as if by the way, "glued to the stream of completely truthful information, is" swallowed "by the average man without hesitation. Then another drop, more .. finally, the truthful infa is distorted beyond recognition !
        The technology has been developed and is effective. But WE, PANCAKE - for "open friendly relations!" So we wipe ourselves off, over and over again.
  9. SPACE
    SPACE 14 December 2016 08: 18
    +2
    Excellent article.
    It is generally not customary to say somehow (for reasons of political correctness) that most people are not very smart and educated, and even those who are smart and educated are easy to manipulate. That is precisely for them the ideology was invented. People are actively brainwashed, and they believe, even if it is absurd.

    Ideology is, by analogy with a computer, a control program loaded into the brains of the ediot-inhabitants, acting on the principle of "Muskwell's demons", after that, whatever information is not loaded into this head, it gives out a strictly defined result, otherwise a person's mood deteriorates and a migraine sets in, you get a zombie. Media propaganda is a process of programming and management, Ideology is a weapon, a means of control and autonomous control of the population, the mobilization of modern warriors, so that they would clearly follow orders and less doubt in the struggle for a place in the sun. Yes, there are different ideologies and even the absence of ideology, this is also an ideology, the question is which side you are on.
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 09: 22
      +1
      after that, whatever information is loaded into this head, it gives a strictly defined result


      Like that, but not quite
  10. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 14 December 2016 08: 20
    +9
    "they seem to have two ideologies: one for export, the other for their own"
    Well noticed. There is such a pathology, a split personality, a person becomes inadequate. Two ideologies in one head are not schizophrenia, but an inadequate perception of reality.
    "In today's Germany, the standard of living is higher than in Russia"
    They would launch equipment using cheap Russian gas. And in the Russian Federation, energy is expensive, because the country's citizens cover all the losses of companies. As you know, gasoline always rises in price: when world oil prices rise, when world oil prices fall. A mechanism has been launched to prevent the development of production in the country. This is not a market relationship - it is a process of colonization of the state.
    "The USSR simply did not know how to 'sell' correctly. The propaganda was frankly poor."
    And it is true. She herself led a circle of political education: the topic did not reflect realities, nobody was interested in the postulates of many years ago. But there was no opposition to the information processing of consciousness. Yes, it was jammed on the air, but somehow it was jammed so that everything was audible.
    "Why did the Americans win the Cold War? One of the reasons: building communism is difficult and costly, and Hollywood is much cheaper."
    And they also aroused consumerism in people. And the real propaganda of consumerism was party functionaries who were not interested in problems, but tried to grab more benefits.
    “We must not be offended, but act in accordance with realities. You just need to step by step abandon the logic of“ cooperation ”and move on to the logic of“ confrontation ”.
    If you remember Russian history, you will understand that the West has always tried to destroy our state. And no matter what the excuse was, they needed our resources. And this is a reality that cannot be ignored, because it will always be relevant as long as Russia exists. We do not have an equal partnership. See the situation with gas pipelines. Really does not cut consciousness as they try to pinch us. I would like to ask Miller: "Isn't it a shame for the state? Not tired of humiliation?"
    It must be thought of: in a country with a harsh climate, long distances, impassability, is the cheapest labor? And it causes joy at the top. And it’s nothing that in such conditions, cheap labor means dropping the citizens of the country beyond the brink of survival, i.e. this leads to depopulation of the population. And what is the answer for the authorities? Hide behind the slogans of democracy and humanism. The part of the population that is able to feed themselves and their children — they have children with 2 and 3 children each, but they are in the minority. And young people, their absolute majority, which is not a qualified labor force, are not able to support their families, because does not have stable sufficient income. Therefore, instead of hundreds of thousands of healthy children born from young parents, the country invests in nursing hundreds of premature babies, many of whom, unfortunately, will remain disabled.
    And where is the realism of the country's leadership?
    "And you can't count on an honest, adequate attitude by definition." hi
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 14 December 2016 09: 41
      +2
      Quote: olimpiada15
      energy resources in the Russian Federation are expensive, because the country's citizens cover all the losses of companies

      I agree with you in many respects - but be more objective: if you recalculate the price of gas for the population of the Russian Federation, it will turn out to be much cheaper than the export price.
      He himself somehow asked himself this question - and was surprised at the result ..
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 14 December 2016 11: 00
        +4
        Quote: avia1991
        He himself somehow asked himself this question - and was surprised at the result ..

        In the USSR, my dad paid for a communal apartment 25 times less than a salary. I pay a lot more now. (I will not say lope) laughing
    2. cap
      cap 14 December 2016 09: 59
      +1
      Quote: olimpiada15
      It must be thought of: in a country with a harsh climate, long distances, impassability, is the cheapest labor? And it causes joy at the top. And it’s nothing that in such conditions, cheap labor means dropping the citizens of the country beyond the brink of survival, i.e. this leads to depopulation of the population. And what is the answer for the authorities? Hide behind the slogans of democracy and humanism.

      I myself live in RPKPS, so I won’t comment. Now on the balcony
      - 20, at night it will be - 29.
      "YAKUTSK, December 13, 2016, 12:07 - REGNUM Yakutyans, who on December 6, by government decree, no longer officially live in areas equated to the territory of the Far North, had to be reassured. Benefits for people will be preserved," assured Olga Balabkina, vice-speaker of the State Assembly of the republic. the REGNUM correspondent was informed in the press service of the regional parliament that settlements can be equated to the regions of the Far North if there are no motorways on the territory that connect it with the "Big Land", or they are seasonal.
      See also: In the Amur region, Khabarovsk Territory and Yakutia, reduced the territory of the Far North
      “Products, medicines and other goods are delivered ahead of schedule to such regions. They establish a special pricing procedure for oil products, ”explained Olga Balabkina, noting that Aldan, Tommot and Neryungri, as well as the settlements of Leninsky and Nizhny Kuranakh, have year-round communication with the whole country, both automobile and railway.
      "Transport isolation as such does not exist, not to mention periods of more than 180 days," the vice-speaker noted.
      She assured that the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation does not imply the abolition of the so-called northern benefits - preferential length of service in the appointment of a pension, additional leave, salary allowances and others. These social support measures are enshrined in the Labor Code of Russia and in a number of federal laws.
      Balabkina also expressed hope that in the future, representatives of the federal government will explain the changes in important documents that have a great public resonance, "and in the future we will not get into a situation where executive authorities and local legislators are forced to reassure citizens."
      https://regnum.ru/news/society/2216905.html
      1. olimpiada15
        olimpiada15 14 December 2016 13: 03
        +3
        The authorities believe that if there is a road, then the distance is less, the warm period has lengthened and the temperature is higher? The first sign of the abolition of benefits. At first, they reassure: do not worry, the benefits remain, they are spelled out in other laws, then silently silently exclude the benefits to bring them in line with the changes introduced, because areas do not belong to the Far North. And there will be no grounds for revision: excluded. The work of effective managers who will receive millions of payments due to falling living standards.
        1. cap
          cap 14 December 2016 13: 21
          +2
          Quote: olimpiada15
          The work of effective managers who will receive millions of payments due to falling living standards.


          Today, December 14.12.2016, 21.45, 14.45 (at XNUMX Moscow time) there will be comments on the Vesti Russia Khabarovsk program. They will not say who will speak. We are waiting. It turns out that conversations (stuffing) were earlier. That's what I found on the network. We prepared it before the arrest of Ulyukaev.
          https://rg.ru/2016/09/06/izmenitsia-perechen-goro
          dov-i-rajonov-priravnennyh-k-krajnemu-severu.html
          Mostly more expensive fuel, further down the chain.
  11. fa2998
    fa2998 14 December 2016 08: 40
    +5
    Quote: Titsen
    A plus article - ideology above all!

    Well, I don’t know! An empty refrigerator forces a person to be cautious about the information that TV gives. And with a constantly empty refrigerator it causes rejection. Whatever our URA-TV says, it affects little people, especially who has several children! hi
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 09: 21
      0
      An empty refrigerator forces a person to be careful about the information that TV gives. And with a refrigerator that is always empty, it causes rejection


      Counter-question: How did it work in Ukraine, in Georgia?
      And why not?
      What are these "theories" true for one country?
  12. Gardamir
    Gardamir 14 December 2016 08: 56
    +6
    In general, the article is five plus, but I will add.
    The expression fridge-TV war is wrong because the authorities have learned to stuff their bellies. Sometimes someone says there is no food and I understand him, but there are "comedians" offering a lift of food. Has anyone read the composition of modern bread? For know-it-alls, I explain bread is at least water and flour, well, yeast is also possible. All! The same goes for cheeses and sausages. Cheese is not made from milk, sausages are not made from meat. So the refrigerator is filled rather conditionally.
    Speaking of the Sochi Olympics? Not everyone went to the Moscow Olympics either, and then they also staged a coup in Poland, but the Soviet Union did not allow attacking "pet corns." Now our athletes have been fucked by the whole world. There was no reply. And the enemies of Russia liked this new anti-doping scandal, everyone already knows that. And here's a cherry on the cake
    Quietly and without a pump, Russia took the 2017 World Skeleton and Bobsleigh Championship in Sochi. The relevant international federation routinely canceled the previous decision on the venue and will announce a new venue in the coming days.
    Then they will take away the football championship. And no need to buzz, like "let them try", they will not try, they will just take it away, and who will tell them what? Russian government? For which partners are more expensive than Russia!
    1. YUG64
      YUG64 14 December 2016 14: 43
      0
      I don’t know how much "partners" are dear to our government, but I know for sure that it is impossible to compare the capabilities of the USSR together with the allies - and this, for a minute, half of Europe and not only - with the capabilities of modern Russia ... We are just beginning to gain influence, and allies .... And this process cannot be and will not be quick ... Well, many of our compatriots really want the Russian authorities to "do the editing", but quickly, otherwise the patriots are not comfortable ... Guys, and a squirrel, there will be a whistle. There will certainly be, this cannot be changed. Just don't run ahead of the locomotive and the driver, cursing ... This is superfluous!
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 14 December 2016 16: 32
        +3
        . Will by all means, this will not change
        that is, liberals in power suddenly become patriots?
        1. YUG64
          YUG64 15 December 2016 00: 23
          0
          Are there just liberals?
          1. avia1991
            avia1991 15 December 2016 22: 41
            +1
            Quote: YUG64
            Are there just liberals?

            Not only. But basically. And the main Pilot, by the way - too. Or didn’t you hear his own confession?
            Quote: YUG64
            .We are just starting to gain both influence and allies.

            As you know, we have only TWO real allies. All the rest are temporary workers.
            Quote: YUG64
            Well, many of our compatriots really want the Russian authorities to "do the editing"
            Our compatriots want us, in response to meanness, to stop wiping ourselves, and at least not to swallow it in silence! And if Lies is published in central newspapers - what the hell, at State Department briefings! - then call the ambassador (following the example of England), and drag him in the face on the carpet! And let the people throw rotten eggs at the embassy - so that they don’t think that they can behave here as they please!
            I do not like?! To hell from Russia!
            Throw out one embassy - everyone will be combed, because it is fraught with a real war - and no one wants to actually fight, because the consequences are known in advance .. but for this it is necessary to encroach on the "sacred" - on the foreign accounts of our damn "elites"! And then we stumbled ... nizzyayas..Pretending that "everything is according to plan" - and cheerfully organize the next truce: in Syria, in sports, in political self-assertion! ... Politely calling it a fashionable word "tolerance" ... There are no more words - only mats remained.
  13. cannabis
    cannabis 14 December 2016 09: 10
    +2
    Ideology is a belief system. The very concept of "ideology" is invented, does not exist in nature. Ideology is like the instruction manual for a washing machine or the Military Regulations - for each machine its own and for each army the only correct way to turn around. If everyone knew from an early age what the world in which he was born was, then it would be impossible to control it. Therefore, to control the masses, religions, ideologies, laws have been invented. All these systems are inherently false, because they lead a person away from the path of knowing the truth through the truth. Ideologies clearly fulfill their function, which clever people expressed with the phrase "No one has yet succeeded in defeating Lie with the weapon of Truth. To defeat a lie can only be done with even more lies! Conclusion: Truth does not participate in the planetary struggle of ideologies.
    1. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 14 December 2016 13: 51
      +2
      Good comment.
      Especially liked
      "if everyone from an early age knew what the world was in which he was born, then it was impossible to control them."
      The fact is that no matter what slogans are uttered, authorities declaring themselves adherents of democracy and liberalism, individual freedom, struggle with those whose consciousness cannot be controlled, despite the fact that these are people who are law-abiding citizens. Take the statements of Gref and Chubais, and any of the entire elite cohort — they all need slaves, those. people whose consciousness can be controlled. Therefore, it is necessary that only in relation to slaves are they an elite. And belonging to the elite for them is nothing more than slavery, albeit covered by other terms and slogans, modernized, but slavery.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 14 December 2016 09: 16
    +3
    Quote: Gardamir
    But the average person should be able to understand what is good and what is bad.
    What for?

    At least in order to be able to read and at least slightly analyze comments (including yours).
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 14 December 2016 16: 41
      +2
      analyze a little
      people have developed short working memory. Who, for example, remembers how they always "rejoiced" at the appointment of the pro-Russian Mogherini, but as soon as she was chosen, she immediately became anti-Russian.
      Or for example, someone says that Russia is doomed to liberalism. No, they still call him not a liberal, but a patriot. Where is the analytical ability, this is some kind of pseudology, wishful thinking.
  15. igordok
    igordok 14 December 2016 10: 12
    +1
    Thank. Many letters that are interesting to read.
  16. hohryakov066
    hohryakov066 14 December 2016 10: 58
    +4
    Article + clearly. Personally, I have not met in VO quite a while ago thoughts so coinciding with my own.
  17. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 14 December 2016 11: 05
    +1
    Interesting article "+" ...........
    But to contrast the refrigerator with the TV ..... I think it's not right.
    A man looks in an empty refrigerator, sighs and sits in front of the TV ..... And there ......
    VKS in Syria, Governor arrested ...! So that's where all the money and products are!
    Switch the channel, and there .... Sanctions against Russia! .... He is to the refrigerator .... Empty! So NATO and the USA are guilty!
    That's the fridge with the TV and go under the arm.
    The refrigerator shows the actual condition, and the TV explains why and because of whom.
    Only each channel and in each country explains everything in its own way and in different ways ... As in general, each man also makes a decision on the refrigerator in different ways. One goes and earns to fill it, and the other is looking for a rope to "hang mice" in it.
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 19: 27
      +2


      As in general, every man also decides differently on the refrigerator
  18. Rostislav
    Rostislav 14 December 2016 11: 14
    +3
    Very correct article. There would be an opportunity - I would put five "+".
    I am sure that the aforementioned is not a secret for the country's leadership, but there are no practical actions on this front. But you need to start with changes to the Constitution, - with the abolition of the supremacy of international law and the independence of the central bank, and with the formulation of a national idea.
  19. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 14 December 2016 11: 44
    +3
    Quote: Gormengast
    An ideology based on reality is correct.

    This is not an ideology - it is a tactic to achieve the main goal of social structure!
    In short, the main goal of capitalism of any formation - the main goal is money, which allows the use of other people's labor for their even greater enrichment. The goal of socialism is the development of society and man, and money is a tool to achieve this goal. And if there had not been an attempt to build socialism in the USSR, then the population of the West would not have received many social benefits today. It was the fear of the socialist revolution that made big capital give up part of its profits to workers. Well, etc. hi
  20. svp67
    svp67 14 December 2016 12: 16
    +2
    Vz.58,
    Quote: Vz.58
    Now the expressions "meenyazdesnet" and "ichtamnet" are used to refer to Russian troops in Syria

    It seems that you have something with logic if we recognize that Russian military assistance came to Syria at the request of the legitimate government of the Syrian Arab Republic. So what are you talking about?
  21. Bering Strait
    Bering Strait 14 December 2016 12: 19
    +4
    Sorry, but when the State Duma increases its salaries and immediately reduces the minimum wage in the Russian Federation for the next year, which will obviously leave the budget without money, and Russian citizens without a pension, then the idea comes that without destroying the internal enemy, victory over the external is impossible.
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 19: 25
      0
      Sorry, but when the State Duma increases its salaries and immediately reduces the minimum wage in the Russian Federation


      But would you (as an intelligent person) have acted differently? bully
      1. Bering Strait
        Bering Strait 15 December 2016 10: 00
        0
        Yes, I would have done otherwise. Brezhnev did not starve and the population of the USSR grew during his reign and there was a fleet and an army. What now?! The population is decreasing, and soon there will be nothing left of the fleet, because new ships are being built too slowly to replace the outgoing ones. These grabbers do not steal because they live poorly and have nothing to eat, but they export huge funds abroad, much more than is necessary for life, even if it is beautiful. They are ravaging the country and destroying its population. Such people must be shot as enemies of the people and the state, and together with the family, because 1) The family knows that it lives on stolen money and is an accomplice in the crime. 2) Others will not be okay ..... When Brezhnev fell into insanity from old age, supermeasures began to steal, including his alcoholic daughter, and as a result, the collapse of the USSR ... If the current ones do not change their minds, or they are not kicked out of the Kremlin with a `` palace coup '' they will destroy the Russian Federation ...
  22. rfotq
    rfotq 14 December 2016 12: 44
    +1
    All is well, but why justify oneself? There are many polysyllabic explanations about the prosral country and I’m not to blame - I would like to save I would do what I should. And Mosk would not do the rest (
  23. Tambov Wolf
    Tambov Wolf 14 December 2016 12: 57
    +4
    Who said that there is no ideology in our country? There is, and by 100. It’s like a code of ethics before: 1. Money is above all 2. Money is made in any way, up to selling the Motherland and some kind of people. 3 . A friend is one who has a lot of money. And you write there is no ideology. The whole top and those who join them (to the remains of the feeder) live and feel wonderful.
    1. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 14 December 2016 14: 57
      0
      Add 4. Whoever has the money has power.
      And the people have nothing to resent, money rules them. And money has no human qualities.
      The ideology of the dikat of money. The money itself goes to where there is a lot of it and go away from those who have little money. And they like to play money, have fun. It's nobody's fault. All decide the money themselves.
  24. Igor V
    Igor V 14 December 2016 13: 20
    +2
    Yes, I heard about Russia’s entry into Europe from time to time, but considered it to be a bit of humor, just look at the map.
    As for the Europeans, at first they aroused curiosity, but over time it was gone, there was only one precipitate. In this sediment it is clearly seen that Europeans are deeply provincial, small-town people, frightened by propaganda and fearing not only Russia, but also tomorrow. And only after drinking fairly, the European begins to pour out all his fear, hidden on the shelves of consciousness. Their small-mindedness is determined by the degree of education in Russia. The more they learn, the deeper the misunderstanding of the environment. In short, wretched people.
  25. nnz226
    nnz226 14 December 2016 13: 41
    +3
    It is high time for Russia not to make excuses for all sorts of nonsense of the West, but "specifically run into them" for any reason and even without it ... And less diplomatic "snot": fools should be called that, stupidity should be characterized as such ...
    1. trantor
      trantor 15 December 2016 17: 17
      0
      Quote: nnz226
      fools should be called so, stupidity - and characterize ...

      Yes, calling is not a question. The problem is different - you need to write down a million bufs in order to realize that this is really so ... something tells you that the Ribbentrop propaganda in its methodology was very, very ...
  26. Altona
    Altona 14 December 2016 14: 36
    +8


    Dedicated to present Belarus.
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 14 December 2016 16: 08
      0
      What is not to hide.
  27. Stanislas
    Stanislas 14 December 2016 14: 43
    +2
    Propaganda also needs to learn
  28. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 14 December 2016 15: 57
    +1
    It is only a pity that the stinking liberal slime that usurped power in 1993 spat on Russia and the Russian people from a high tower. This has always happened when greedy Seonist minorities came to power.
    To pick out this dirty trick, you need will and reason, which, in principle, do not exist in the Russian eltsinoid top soaring in the clouds. We can only wait until the current "steering" impotent people die and hope that in the next 5 years they will not plunge the country into another abyss.
    Prapor and k / f "DMB" said: "... bang. But later ..."
    Maybe this "later" came? Isn't it time for the Western vile geeks to answer for the market?
    Or does the Russian establishment enjoy when they wipe their feet and use them as doormats in the outhouse?
    If only they would troll sensibly this pro-Western abomination.
  29. Landing Station6
    Landing Station6 14 December 2016 16: 52
    0
    Convincing, but there is no desire to live by the principle of "equal to the bastard"
    1. trantor
      trantor 15 December 2016 17: 11
      0
      I understand you, but there is a simple question: They shoot at you. In response, shoot? Or in another way: Do you know what they will shoot at you from this position - put the stretch marks on the approaches?
  30. Protoreus
    Protoreus 14 December 2016 17: 34
    0
    For some reason, it is now necessary to prove the inevitability of ideology, but before the age of 91, its necessity was not questioned. There is simply no person without ideology. And that’s it. Ideology distinguishes man from the rest of the animal kingdom; it was ideology that made man human. And paradoxically, it is precisely ideology that can return a person to an animal state. So the ideology of ideology is different. And you need to remember this, and to remember, you need to raise this topic all the time. After all, the West was scotched because it has an ideology of consumption, a cult of a calf (not even a gold one).
  31. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 14 December 2016 18: 20
    +1
    Quote: victorsh
    Interesting. And what is the ideology of some of our officials sitting on Olympus authorities?

    They are all compradors. Their ideology - loot above all!
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 19: 22
      0
      1 Not All
      2 Not a fact ... stop
  32. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 14 December 2016 19: 09
    +2
    I read the article for a long time. Then, honestly, I switched to speed reading, but ... I still did not notice the ideology of today's Russia. Where to aim? Which peaks? The author washed the bones to all neighbors, but forgot about his homeland ...
    And, about the victory in Ukraine of the refrigerator over the TV ... For two years I have not been with relatives near Kiev (I have a father there), but I communicate regularly. Believe me - they never go hungry. I will make a reservation right away - my dad is a simple pensioner. His environment is just ordinary people. There are difficulties. Communal - yes, but they also solve it. But hunger - no. And the same depending on the telly ...
    1. Olezhek
      14 December 2016 19: 40
      +1
      And, about the victory in Ukraine of the refrigerator over the TV ... For two years I have not been with relatives near Kiev (I have a father there), but I communicate regularly. Believe me - they never go hungry.


      1 I am merciful for them
      2 When declaring non-fallow lands, the population of Ukraine amounted to 52 million
      Now in the territory under the theoretical control of Kuev live 36-38 million (figs live)
      For 25 years, Karl!
      Forward! Heroam Salo!
      3 Regularly read ukrogazety and ukrokommentarii.
      I have one question: are there smart and mentally healthy Ukrainians?
      (There was Buzina, but they shot him - a too-smart Ukrainian becomes a Muscovite and a zradnik!)

      I would place all the Ukrainians with CIs above 100 at the junta’s camps ... they are dangerous to the redhead.
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 14 December 2016 23: 38
        +1
        Here, apparently, your TV won and the refrigerator, and the computer and phone ...
  33. iouris
    iouris 14 December 2016 20: 18
    0
    Ideology against the refrigerator.
  34. trantor
    trantor 15 December 2016 17: 05
    0
    Apparently the author is right: In war - as in war. And it doesn’t matter that it is informational. And it is disgusting to respond to the system-built obvious lie. But it is necessary. In a traditional war, it’s impossible not to shoot when they shoot at you.
  35. Murat_Nalchik
    Murat_Nalchik 4 May 2021 21: 12
    0
    “Of course, a lot of things can be argued here at once. Firstly, Belarusians are Russians, for a German or a Frenchman this is exactly the case, and the attitude towards them will always be appropriate - just as“ Russians ”, that is, to people of the fifth grade. Europeans are natural-born nationalists. And the gradation of nations in each country is different and very harsh. So for the majority of northern Europeans, Russians (Belarusians) are even worse than blacks and Arabs in the form of refugees. That is why our emigrants often demonstratively despise Russia (to adapt to an environment where being Russian is bad) ".
    ================================================== ==========
    Author, you forgot to say that Russians in Europe are sent to concentration camps, shackled, whipped, forced to work 14-16 hours a day and raped several times every day. The author is you and ** from and a bastard! How many people from Russia have I known who lived in European countries, and their stories have absolutely nothing in common with that disgusting nonsense that you are carrying, stupid fascist scum!