The government of the PMR offers the official use of the flag of the Russian Federation on a par with the republican

35
The press service of the Government of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika reports on a bill initiated by the Ministry of Justice of Transnistria regarding the use of the flag of the Russian Federation. The bill proposes the use of the Russian tricolor at republican events, as well as in government bodies, on a par with the PMR flag.

In the coming days, the bill proposed by the Ministry of Justice will be considered by the Supreme Council of the Pridnestrovskaia Moldavskaia Respublika.
The head of the republican government, Pavel Prokudin, said that such a measure would protect the Russian flag from attacks by certain radicals. The point is that at a recent concert in Tiraspol an act of vandalism and abuse of the Russian tricolor was committed. This action in the government of the PMR was called a clear provocation, the aim of which is to try to embroil Tiraspol with Moscow.



The government of the PMR offers the official use of the flag of the Russian Federation on a par with the republican


From materials press service PMR:
In this regard, it was proposed to make changes to the Code of Administrative Offenses, providing for liability for violation of the procedure for using state symbols, including a foreign state in the territory of the MRT. The proposed changes (...) will approve the procedure for using the Russian flag as an official symbol, and emphasize the adherence and desire of Transnistrians to reunite with the Russian Federation.


Recall that earlier, as a result of the referendum, the overwhelming majority of the residents of Transnistria expressed themselves in favor of independence from Moldova and joining the Russian Federation.

The official flag of the PMR is a red rectangular panel with a green horizontal stripe in the center and a sickle and hammer, topped with a star, in the upper left corner. This is an exact copy of the flag of the Moldavian SSR.
  • http://gov-pmr.org
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Cat
    +7
    9 December 2016 07: 19
    Weighted position. Nothing to say!
    1. +11
      9 December 2016 07: 23
      They want to become part of Russia.
      The bill provides for the use of the Russian tricolor at republican events, as well as in government along with the flag of the PMR.
      1. +7
        9 December 2016 07: 29
        And we also want this ... Does our leadership want the same, that’s the question ... Most likely they want to maintain the status quo ..
        Quote: Delink
        They want to become part of Russia.
        The bill provides for the use of the Russian tricolor at republican events, as well as in government along with the flag of the PMR.
        1. +5
          9 December 2016 07: 45
          Quote: 210ox
          They want to become part of Russia.

          Quote: 210ox
          And we also want this ...

          Second Kaliningrad? That's cool! Geyropa farts will tear herself up with anger !!!!!! Iskander from two sides!
          1. +2
            9 December 2016 07: 53
            And who will let the Iskanders put in Transnistria? There is a complete blockade on the delivery of weapons and equipment. And if rockets appear, a new crisis will begin.
            1. +5
              9 December 2016 08: 23
              Quote: Sentry73
              And who will let the Iskanders put in Transnistria? There is a complete blockade

              So you yourself answered your own question! So you need to unblock Transnistria! It was business, in '14, at the time of anarchy, Ukraine lay before Putin, as if on a heel! Oh South with Odessa and East with Kharkov and the Dnieper, they literally rushed themselves! But no. I did not dare. At this point, sanctions were announced. Although, it would seem to be the other way around! Announced, and then what to fear?
              1. +5
                9 December 2016 08: 29
                There is a complicated knot there, but sooner or later it will have to be untied.
                1. +3
                  9 December 2016 09: 58
                  Quote: cniza
                  There is a complicated knot there, but sooner or later it will have to untie.

                  CUT am
            2. +5
              9 December 2016 09: 57
              Quote: Sentry73
              And who will let the Iskanders put in Transnistria?

              And America, who asks where and what to put? Where the blockade, and where not - they nevermind. Are we worse than America? I don’t think ... Already pour more dirt on us than they are pouring now - it still won’t work out. There, in the next branch they write - Babama was planning to deliver weapons to the barmaleys. Well, if we had declared a blockade there? Would that stop him? The weak are beaten, offended and disliked. They are afraid of the strong and arrogant, and then love comes ...
              1. +1
                10 December 2016 10: 33
                We are not strong, but they will beat the arrogant, as in WWII and WWII.
                1. +2
                  10 December 2016 11: 42
                  Quote: Krabik
                  We are not strong, but they will beat the arrogant, as in WWII and WWII.

                  Well, if you personally are not strong, then you do not need to speak on your own behalf for the country and its army. I gave this army more than 20 calendars, moreover, to the most combat-ready troops of our army. I know what I'm talking about. And I know the strength of at least my troops. There is no task that we could not accomplish. But in the PMR and the Second World War, we were not beaten.
                  1. 0
                    10 December 2016 12: 42
                    Well, you are such a cool guy.

                    So in WWI RI did not fall apart and beat someone, and the Germans did not occupy the entire western part of RI ?!

                    Who was the enemy in the Second World War?
                    And whom did we as a result beat with losses of 20 million civilians and 7 million military?

                    If we have such a cool army, why did you merge Chechnya and now Kadyrov is building a personal army there?

                    Is Georgia too tough for it?
                    It seems the country is small, there was not enough enthusiasm?
                    1. +2
                      11 December 2016 05: 08
                      Quote: Krabik
                      Well, you are such a cool guy.

                      Yes, I'm such a tough guy. Lieutenant Colonel of the Airborne Forces. And I have been to many places and seen a lot of things. And if it were not for the betrayal of the Humpbacked Dog and the Sverdlovsk Drunkard, then a lot more could have done for the country. And as a result of their betrayal, the still young, experienced officer was thrown out of the army, to which he gave more than half of his life. Do you know life when you get a lieutenant colonel's pension, go to the grocery store and come home with an empty pocket ???? Chechnya passed without me - not through my fault. But I also shot mine honestly - I did not hand over anyone and answered with my head for every kid. So it's not for you, couch warriors, to judge me! And about 20 million - so I have a general suspicion that you are from the "small but independent" Baltic republics. My grandfather fought, my father fought in THAT GREAT war - and you, fine sofa dust, will tell me about our Army ?????? I apologize for the harshness - they brought it up ... By the way, about Georgia - whether it is too tough for us or not -
                      1. 0
                        11 December 2016 06: 20
                        My brother told me about the army after the service.
                        They thumped there and robbed tents, and later he died.

                        Yes, and during the call I myself heard a lot about the trade in soldiers in Chechnya, this was enough for me to refuse to serve.

                        Yes, and to whom to serve?
                        Chubais or Zheleznyak, who rubs the ears of the people about patriotism, and his children studied over the hill and now work there.

                        Or maybe on Lavrov?
                        Which is the same as Zheleznyak.

                        Probably Putin, our small hero;)
                        Who has children and a wife in Germany.

                        Sorry nafig ...
      2. +6
        9 December 2016 07: 30
        I salute their such intention.
        That's just the policy of the Russian Federation in relation to the PMR is somehow incomprehensible.
        1. +9
          9 December 2016 07: 40
          Totally agree! There is no need to push away those who want to be with us, especially since there are those same people, as Putin said, divorced from the Russian world. They are part of us.
        2. 0
          9 December 2016 11: 34
          That's just the policy of the Russian Federation in relation to the PMR is somehow incomprehensible.


          Very clear. Lavrov said that he sees Moldova as one and indivisible.
          1. 0
            9 December 2016 18: 52
            And rightly so. Another level, it is too laborious to restore a vase from fragments, another question is if the vase is whole ...
      3. +1
        9 December 2016 11: 14
        They want to become part of Russia.
        The bill involves the use of the Russian tricolor at national events.

        In Transnistria, all citizens have long been with Russian passports. Russian citizens need the tricolor of Russia.
        1. +2
          9 December 2016 11: 30
          In Transnistria, all citizens have long been with Russian passports

          Not all, and not only with Russian
    2. +1
      9 December 2016 10: 19
      Quote: Kotischa
      Weighted position. Nothing to say!

      Transnistria is consistent. He knows where to go.
    3. +2
      9 December 2016 11: 07
      Quote: Kotischa
      Weighted position. Nothing to say!


      For this action it would be necessary to carry out certification (necessarily voluntary) by Russian documents (all according to the Crimean scenario).
  2. +4
    9 December 2016 07: 23
    And who are these idiots in Tiraspol? "Heroes" in the studio, please .. Cossacks must have been sent from Hohlobanda ..
    1. +4
      9 December 2016 07: 47
      Quote: 210ox
      And who are these idiots in Tiraspol?

      If they want it, they will catch it ... There, in Tiraspol, they have a lot of unoccupied lampposts, hey ... Let's send the ropes if not. Good, hemp .... am
      1. +2
        9 December 2016 18: 56
        Holdaten down. ✌️️
        1. +1
          10 December 2016 10: 35
          And I like his idea;)
        2. +2
          10 December 2016 11: 48
          Quote: LastLap
          Holdaten down. ✌️️

          Pacifists - on the Swamp! Step arsh!
  3. +2
    9 December 2016 08: 05
    most residents of Transnistria favored independence from Moldova and accession to the Russian Federation.

    It is clear that most residents would like this. But still, probably for now our capabilities (economic, and possibly foreign policy) do not allow this. But hope is needed.
    1. +4
      9 December 2016 08: 19
      Quite right. There is a desire, but there is no possibility .. For example, South Ossetia .. Well, what gets in the way, they simply asked not to drive horses .. Abkhazia declared itself independent in terms of not being part of Russia, but there is a different alignment .. and not very good ..
      Quote: rotmistr60
      most residents of Transnistria favored independence from Moldova and accession to the Russian Federation.

      It is clear that most residents would like this. But still, probably for now our capabilities (economic, and possibly foreign policy) do not allow this. But hope is needed.
  4. +7
    9 December 2016 08: 12
    Why integration with Russia is called annexation, and joining the EU is considered the right choice. But this is a rhetorical question.
    1. +7
      9 December 2016 08: 36
      Quote: Arkuda
      Why integration with Russia is called annexation, and joining the EU is considered the right choice.

      I also consider the European Union to be exactly the same single country as the Soviet Union was (of course there are differences, but in general). Maybe we also need to make the same Union, with common money and a single political center in Moscow? What would it look like in form, as if they were different countries, and in content - one country. To accept those who really seek to join Russia there.
  5. +5
    9 December 2016 09: 30
    Quote: Stas157
    Maybe we also need to make the same Union.

    And call it RUSSIAN WORLD!
    And let the enemies choke on their saliva and snot!
  6. +1
    9 December 2016 10: 57
    Yes! Soon there will probably be a new BOOM in Europe! Which will not just be spread out in the corners.
    The independence of Transnistria or entry into the Russian Federation is a blockade on the one hand Moldova, on the other Ukraine.
    Remain part of Moldova ..... This is the EU or part of Romania.
    And the only problem is that people want the right to a happy life .....
  7. +1
    9 December 2016 11: 39
    Here we’ll get to our feet stronger and we’ll take everyone who asks for us.
  8. 0
    10 December 2016 10: 16
    It is high time ! Both Chisinau and Bucharest will behave more calmly.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"