Why the evil poor do not want to get rich - despite the calls of Dmitry Medvedev?
Why do the evil poor do not want to get rich - despite all the calls of Dmitry Medvedev? Money in the budget - “bye-bye”; there is little chance of improvement ... When the bottom of the state ship named “Russia” was openly scrubbing about the stranded, instead of changing the pilots, it was decided to dump cargoes and passengers - perhaps relief would “lift”.
The many years of senseless work in the tax sphere has led to the fact that with a flat scale of taxation, the fiscal burden on individuals reached the level of 43-48 percent of revenues from direct and obligatory payments and requisitions to extrabudgetary funds. This is complemented by indirect fees: real estate and transport taxes, excise taxes, payments for public services ...
That is, almost 50% of the money a person does not receive - he is only “given to hold them”. At the same time, the discussion on “how to improve the tax system” continues. For the most part, it shows that most of the participants have no idea not only about the intricacies of economics, but even about its basics.
First of all, the tax sphere is considered by the discussion participants (and among them are the deputies of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, senators, Deputy Prime Minister Olga Golodets, and Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and now Oreshkin will probably be added) not as a system for regulating relations, but as a system power of the state.
A certain "sacrament" of wealth is supposed, which is unknown where and it is not known how having been formed, turns into private hands. And already these individuals are divided (or not shared) with the state, acting in this scheme "parasite in the passive voice" ...
But in actual fact (obviously!) Everything is not so - and vice versa! After all, people do not give benefits to the state, but the state gives benefits to people! Not citizens pay the salary of the country, and the country to citizens! We do not decide how much the president will receive, but the president decides how much we will receive ...
Ask - how? And here is how: by providing (or not providing) to citizens a protected resource and infrastructure base of their territory, organizing their work on processing raw materials and the exchange of processing products.
If not, then there is nothing. If the tops are waiting for money from banks (in the form of taxes) just as the people from the tops are waiting for money in the form of material assistance - then it remains only to wait until the cancer on the mountain whistles!
The proposed tax scheme is similar to the fact that a farmer would expect taxes from potato tops as part of the tubers, without concern for planting, irrigation, fertilizer, or potato harvesting! That is, the farmer would have moved to the primitive gathering, hunting wild potatoes instead of cultivating it ...
It is important to understand the ministerial and deputy corps of the very literary truth of the economy: a rich person is not one who has taken little, but one who has been given a lot.
This is an absolutely obvious and completely simple truth, because you can take little or nothing from a beggar, but he will remain just as a beggar. From zero, you can take 1%, and you can 99%, anyway, both of them will be zero.
Therefore, all these arguments about taxes are progressive or non-progressive - for illiterate people. In life, it’s not that a rich uncle does his own hands 100%, and then gives 70% to idlers. In life, that's how: he hapnul everything, others got nothing. And those who did not get anything at first, receive benefits from the state through the mediation of a rich uncle who has imposed himself with a progressive scale on fear ...
That is, to distribute wealth - you must first understand, at least in general terms, where it comes from. Our economists, Gaidar's trainees, believe that rich people extract their super-profits directly from themselves, through the anus, or some other flesh-colored hole.
That is, the rich - in the version of economic science from Gaidar and Kudrin - know how to poop money. And the poor do not know how. And they don’t want to learn, and this is their historical guilt before the motherland, liberal reforms and their own descendants.
How many times have all these clever men, before Medvedev inclusive, instructed the poor: we must start our own firm, change jobs for a better paying job, start earning like a human being!
But the evil poor - probably to annoy the liberal bloc in the government of the Russian Federation - stubbornly do not want to get rich. Prosperous family firms are not opened, jobs for beggarly wages are up until hunger strikes - instead of going and getting a “good job”!
I don’t even know who should work with such a picture of the world in the minds of liberal ministers - an economist or a psychiatrist at once ...
Well, after all, it is obvious to everyone - at first all our wealth belongs to the state, the ruling group, the authorities. Then she begins to distribute it: he gives a lot to one person, and he is rich; there is little to another - he is poor; the third is a cookie - he is homeless; etc.
The idea that people do not want to “earn a lot” on purpose, artificially preserves their poverty, maliciously does not make large purchases - it came from some alternative universe.
With the exception of rare pathological personalities, a person is poor not by his own will, but by lack of opportunity. He was not given - so he is poor. And another was given - so he became rich. If they didn’t give, they would be as poor as all the poor ...
And therefore the key question is not whether many or few taxes are taken from the rich. The question is in the very origin of their wealth, the question is, why were they given so much?
How much to take from them, 13% or 70% - the question is already the tenth. And the first question is how and what explains their position as favorites, allowing you to have such personal super-profits in a poor country, which they, of course, did not earn themselves, who were given power by which they were incorporated.
I am absolutely not against rich people. I am against those who, having received maximum resources from the state and the authorities, devour them stupidly and selfishly, without developing the business issued to them by the government, not caring about the growth of the sources of all kinds of material wealth given to them.
The state, led by such stunners, believes that these irresponsible parasites do not brazenly use his gifts, but themselves, through the anus, emit material treasures from themselves.
And instead of strict demand from people who were given a treasure, the state begins to moan their taxes, like a beggar, which is both embarrassing and absurd and ridiculous.
The primitiveness of mind gives a distorted picture of economic reality in which, instead of producing wealth, they begin to divide, as if they are falling from the sky by meteorites. It turns out something like a "factory without workshops", consisting of one accounting. Or something like an agricultural holding without land, with warehouses and barns alone ...
I think even a schoolboy, even a child will understand that if a plant consists of one accounting department, then in the iron safe of this accounting department there will be less and less money, and then they will completely run out.
And this demise will take place not at all because the money was “wrongly” divided between the “workers” —but primarily due to the lack of workshops.
You can divide as you like - to levy taxes on a flat or progressive scale - but first you need to understand where the dividend came from, what makes up the income that you tax on one scale or another.
After all, the fact that paying 90% from a million is still more profitable than 1% from a dime does not go anywhere either. And therefore, it is not the tax percentage that is important, but the value of a person’s initial income.
And this person cannot earn income, so that Medvedev, the champion of small business, doesn’t dare - this income can be given (or not) by the state, the power that distributes the flow of benign resources in its territory!
The wealth of our rich people is largely (if not in everything) due to the undemanding of them on the part of the authorities. If they had confiscated property for the decline in production indicators, they would have invested much more in machines and much less in yachts with football clubs.
If they were really planted for non-payment of the minimum wage by the minimum wage, and the minimum wage would have been made thousands of 50 rubles - all their super-profits would have fled to pay the necessary personnel for the work.
For the time being, all their wealth stands on the poverty of the masses permitted by the state and encouraged by the state. Wealth is formed from environmental poverty, as steam is formed from the heating of water.
It stands at the minimum wage, which is 2 times lower than the subsistence minimum, and even in this form is not always paid to the employee. It stands on the willingness of people left to the mercy of fate by the state to hire for pennies and work a lot, sometimes even qualitatively, for a low and ridiculous reward.
It is necessary to understand that a rich person is not a donkey from a fairy tale popping gold. A rich man is a chauffeur, a driver of a resource-infrastructure machine, who controls the movement of "factories, newspapers, steamboats". So: the government, the state, are driving this car. And it should not just be planted like this: without the right to crash into anything, without the right, dodge the route, risk the life and health of passengers, etc.
Our historical tragedy is that a limousine named "Russia" fell into the hands of an alcoholic Yeltsin. Being an alcoholic, he slept in the back seat, and the drivers (rich people) who were seated behind the wheel — they drove where they wanted to — they used the car as their own, but did not protect it from dents and breakdowns - remembering that it was still a breech…
This tradition continues today. The state literally stomps a wild combination of wealth and irresponsibility: the country's three-year budget is rigidly fixed, on the verge of the possible, while there is no certainty that the income parameters will be met. Everything is tied to oil - as if apart from pipes in our country there is nothing more, and most importantly - as if everything is armless!
And they expect that the introduction of 30-percent tax on 5 percent of citizens with official income over 100 million rubles a year will bring the state treasury no less than 200 billion rubles. And how much will the full confiscation of these 5% bring? Did not try to count?
This makes all the talk about filling the budget in an incomprehensible and ridiculous homozy: after all, they divide the skin of an unkilled bear, they want to collect money in a ready-made form, without any hesitation about where they come from.
The tax system should regulate relations - transferring resources from inefficient hands to effective ones, this is its meaning. It should put pressure on the dead, rental income - and vice versa, encourage lively, entrepreneurial income, increasing the attractiveness of a lively active business before the dead cut of coupons from deposited capital.
Taxes allow the state to withdraw its powers of attorney (money) from the hands harmful to its development and to transfer these powers of attorney to the hands useful for its development. After all, the main purpose of money with a state emblem is to help the blessings in the process of creating new goods, to feed those who sow the bread of the next harvest with bread already baked!
They are trying to assure us that the main goal of the state is to collect those papers from the population, which it, the same state, printed and it distributed to the population!
It’s as if I was running for my own signature, begging myself to sign the paper, and refusing myself to do it ...
With such schizophrenia, the state will never have money - collect them on a flat scale, or progressive, make taxes heavy or easy, without a difference.
The state should organize both its own income and the income of family budgets of its citizens, using various instruments for this, including tax levies.
But if we see a system in the state, naively robbing citizens, in front of this mysterious and incomprehensible image of their own gains (How ?! Outside the territory ?! Outside of jurisdiction ?!) then we lose the state. Just like everything else ...
Information