Iranian Foreign Ministry: Extension of US sanctions will lead to the withdrawal of Tehran from the agreement on the atom

Iran is tired of sanctions, and their extension by the current US administration will lead to a halt in the implementation of the agreement on the atom, reports RIA News Statement by Iranian Foreign Minister Muhammad Zarif

"If they (the United States) return to sanctions, we will not continue to abide by the agreement,"

said the Minister on the air of the channel Press TV.

This statement was made against the background of reports from the White House about the intention of Barack Obama to approve a law on the extension of anti-Iran sanctions for 10 years. The document has already been adopted by both houses of Congress.

The agency recalls that initially the law on sanctions was adopted in 1996 g, and its validity will expire in December of this year. The meaning of this document is to prevent Iran from creating a nuclear weapons. After the signing of the agreement on the atom in 2015, the need for it seemed to have disappeared, but Congress wants to keep the law in force in case Tehran violates the agreements reached.

To date, the IAEA has not identified violations. According to the organization, "Iran is in compliance with its obligations under the agreement with the" six "on the nuclear program, and the level of heavy water reserves meets the conditions of the agreement."

Comments

[Zibelew]

It’s hard to remember something that the Americans didn’t break. And sanctions will not be lifted against us, even if we surrender Crimea. Well, there would be no Crimea, would impose sanctions for violation of gay rights. So it’s better for the Crimea!

[Skeptic Self-Taught]

I look at all this and am surprised.
Iran has the right to vote, someone else adequately responds ... And only we ... We have been imposed sanctions, and we are supplying rocket engines ...
It seems that we are worse than the colony. Someone in the EU started shouting, they say, we need to be friends with the Russian Federation ... and we have "melted", we will still cancel the counter-sanctions now ...
Trump won the call to the Taiwan Fuhrer - the Chinese Foreign Ministry harshly answered ...
And we are liberalizing, how can ... they might be offended ...

[cniza]

Obama is trying as much as possible to harm Trump.

[OLD FART]

Quote: cniza

Obama is trying as much as possible to harm Trump.

That's for sure, that's just the policy of American imperialism, Zionism will remain unchanged ...!
Iran, let's stop the game ... Russia will cover! It’s time to end this canoe, it’s time to attack and are not afraid of sanctions ..!
These cries do not need to be too afraid, it means ...

[venik]

Quote: cniza

Obama is trying as much as possible to harm Trump.

====
And here you are my friend and you are wrong, oh, how WRONG !!! All the last steps of our "monochrome friend" are precisely aimed at providing the successor with as many trump cards as possible! There will be something to bargain with with GDP (like "okay, we will leave your Assad alone, and you do not stop us from crushing the Persians"!). And this is in no way acceptable for Russia! So, if Obama wants to screw up anyone, it is Russia and Putin, and certainly not Trump!
Do not forget - they are both Yankees and for both "America is above all" (only the methods are different), and all sorts of party disagreements there - this is so - the 10th thing ...

[Oleg14774]

Quote: Skeptic Self-taught

We were imposed sanctions, and we are supplying rocket engines ...

especially since we get a penny for these engines, and the Americans use them to deliver spy and pro satellites into orbit. against us. Liberals who are supposedly hiding behind "business" have gone completely crazy! They are already completely tired! And about the islands on D.V. here even to talk nefig (this is so by the way). Because NATO has begun to expand and does not fulfill any of the agreements. If we do not fulfill it, Europe will not go anywhere. Will swallow.

[user1212]

Quote: Skeptic Self-taught

We were imposed sanctions, and we are supplying rocket engines ...

This is "right"! Do not sell RD180! Close production, fire staff, plunder equipment!
This is sarcasm, for those who do not understand

[twincam]

because it is much cooler here to drive geliks around Moscow, pi .... to spend billions, and when you really need to defend the face of the country - so immediately a guilty smile, and calling direct enemies "partners".

[alekc73]

Trump is smart enough not to talk about the situation

[Vladimir 38]

Trump yes, enough of the mind. But not everything he decides .. I think that the sanctions will be extended against Iran.

[Pirogov]

Quote: Vladimir 38

Trump yes, enough of the mind. But not everything he decides .. I think that the sanctions will be extended against Iran.

I would say that Trump is not enough at all, which decides ..... now the bidding will begin ...........

[twincam]

enough for trump.
we don’t have enough to take advantage of this situation.

[kaserog]

Quote: alekc73

Trump is smart enough not to talk about the situation

it's unlikely - Trump screamed that he doesn’t like Iran and will punish

[rruvim]

There was no such thing. It's just that "Mad Dog" (the future head of the Pentagon) constantly repeats to him: "Remember, remember - 1979 ... A-A-A !!!" Trump was building the Casino then, it was not until Tehran. So he believes.

[Old26]

Quote: alekc73

Trump is smart enough not to talk about the situation

He is more adequate than Obama. Something with logic sometimes. Several years of work of the six-party commission down the drain. And most importantly, it is not beneficial to anyone. Both us and the USA

[Thunderbolt]

Vladimir, why is it not profitable for the United States? Israel and the Saudi monarchies are hostile towards Iran, and they are also strategic partners of the United States. ?

[Gormenghast]

This is a very revealing example for Russia. The IAEA says everything is in order, but exceptional sanctions are being extended. Therefore, counting on lifting sanctions against Russia is stupid. Sanctions have always been and will be forever. You just need to take a similar position on all other issues. And to sign something only after - upon the fact of - concessions to the United States, and not promises.

Germany twice promised the USSR huge money for the unification of Germany. It all ended with the fact that the traitors gave the GDR free of charge and even the German communist comrades did not protect themselves from persecution by the bourgeois. Betrayal!
The USSR was destroyed without any concessions from NATO, which, know yourself, continues to spread to the East. Betrayal!
The Oka OTRK, which does not fall under the RIAC, was liquidated for nothing. Betrayal!
Under START-2, they eliminated the BZHRK, and now they are forced to rebuild. Betrayal!
500 tons of weapons-grade uranium were handed over to the United States at the price of toilet paper. Amerasts also produced electricity from this, g-dy! Betrayal! They had to pay the real price, but this money had to be paid in the form of benefits to those who had ruined their health in radiochemical plants; even so.

Etc; examples are the legion.

[Rurikovich]

Quote: Gormengast

Etc; examples are the legion.

But you have to agree with everything for in fact it is ...
I wonder how Joseph Vissarionovich would react to such "concessions" ? If he knew that in the future the country would be so torn apart, maybe he would have immediately surrendered to Hitler, like a "civilized" Europa
After all, you can't take money with you to the next world, but they may ask for conscience. Even today's oligarchs will be able to answer the question of where their wealth began? I would still kind of respect it, if like Rockefcller and Ford with every penny saved and malnourished, but thanks to the brains. But nobody created anything, but only stupidly "grabbed" what the people built. PEOPLE, not them! I wonder what would happen to the different Abramovichs and Khodarkovskys, Sechins and Prokhorovs, if the real Master were in power? ... Could they buy luxury yachts or foreign clubs ??? .....
The question is rhetorical ....

[const72]

however, Congress wants to uphold the law in case Tehran violates the agreement.

Trump question, in advance, so to speak

[Tusv]

Here I agree with the Yankees. Why do you need nuclear weapons? We have concluded a military-technical cooperation - omerica doesn’t crush. It’s better to multiply the sturgeon population. We’re nuclear neighbor - is guilty of death.

[Skeptic Self-Taught]

Better a nuclear neighbor and shared interests than an envious neighbor.

[Tusv]

Quote: Skeptic Self-taught

Better a nuclear neighbor and shared interests than an envious neighbor.

Are you hinting at country 404 ?. "You argue apolitically," as Comrade Saakhov said. Already gallant priblatnenny zhurnalyuzh say, take them away already at last. Do you know what the annexation of Crimea cost us? All funded pension. It was worth it. Attach the entire outskirts? I somehow prefer to come to work in my pants

[cap]

This statement was made against the background of reports from the White House about the intention of Barack Obama to approve a law on the extension of anti-Iran sanctions for 10 years. The document has already been adopted by both houses of Congress.

The darkest continues in his spirit. Crap in the end.
The Iranians did not expect such a blow under the breath, but rejoiced like.
There is only one conclusion, it is impossible to believe the Anglo-Saxons, they will be thrown at any time.

[newcomer]

I would say this is a lesson to the Iranians. nothing is new by the half moon: the Yankees try to bend everyone, the more the object of tanning yields, the more the Yankees sit. Thank God, it’s kind of like, we have learned this truth, but at a high price.

[Old26]

Quote: Gormengast

Under START-2, they eliminated the BZHRK, and now they are forced to rebuild. Betrayal!

We didn’t eliminate them because of START-2. But because the warranty period has expired.

Quote: Gormengast

500 tons of weapons-grade uranium were handed over to the United States at the price of toilet paper.

Well, do not exaggerate. Several times cheaper, yes, I agree, but not at the price of toilet paper.

Say thanks to Gorby and Shevardnadze for Oka. Margaret "bred them like suckers" ...

[Gormenghast]

We didn’t eliminate them because of START-2. But because the warranty period has expired.

Checked on the text of the contract; Yes - there is not a word about BZHRK. So, is this even more betrayal?
The Voevoda is still on alert, and why hasn't the service life of the Scalpel been extended? Or was the solid fuel of such poor quality?

Well, do not exaggerate. Several times cheaper, yes, I agree, but not at the price of toilet paper.

The cost of enrichment fell by an order of magnitude, if not by two. But the Americans paid at the current cost, based on their required expenditures of the SWU, and not at the actual costs that were incurred. In addition, there is no market for weapons-grade uranium; the real price of this "product"unknown, but the State Duma of the Russian Federation, in 1997, counted 8 trillion dollars, instead of 12 billion paid. There are also calculations that yield 50 billion in output. Still, betrayal is there.

[mr.redpartizan]

The missile for the BZHRK was produced at Yuzhmash, like the Voevoda, so the train had to be removed from service. Not all railway tracks could withstand the old BZHRK with a 100-ton rocket on board; heavy wear and tear of the tracks occurred on the tracks. "Barguzin" will carry on board a rocket weighing up to 50 tons and use only one locomotive instead of three, and the smaller dimensions and weight of the rocket will significantly improve the camouflage of the rocket train and avoid accelerated rail wear.

[mr.redpartizan]

Russia must unilaterally lift sanctions against Iran, bypassing UN resolutions. The UN no longer decides anything, but the sanctions against Iran hinder our cooperation with the Persians in the military sphere and cast a shadow on interstate relations. Our enemies are the US and the EU, so you shouldn't indulge them. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. We must adopt this principle, and not play "partners".

[Banishing liberoids]

Sometimes I am even more literate, but today the authors have surpassed me "his document is to prevent Iran from creating nuclear weapons"! allow the creation of these weapons ?

[rruvim]

All nuclear weapons and a lot! Pakistan has nuclear weapons? It has. Does Israel have nuclear weapons? It has. Why can't Iran have it? The Persians are guilty of what? Only one! With the silly phrase of their Spiritual Leader, "Israel must be destroyed!" And that's it! And also that the Iranians are Shiites, and the main supplier of fuel for the Saudis is the Sunnis.
Krylov's fable: "It is your fault that I want to eat ... and dragged the lamb into the forest ..."

[mr.redpartizan]

The proliferation of nuclear weapons is always bad, so Russia should not help anyone in this matter, but we cannot prohibit anyone from developing it. If the Iranians can create a nuclear bomb on their own, then this should not be a reason for sanctions on our part. WMD is the only guarantee of state security in the current geopolitical situation, there is no hope for the UN.

[Wiskar]

Quote: rruvim

Does Israel Have Nuclear Weapons? It has. Why can't Iran have it? What are the Persians guilty of? Only one!

I explain a simple truth. The presence of nuclear weapons in Israel does not begin at the beginning of the nuclear arms race, and the presence of nuclear weapons in Iran, as soon as it becomes really known, will lead to an arms race - nuclear weapons will also be in Saudi Arabia and Egypt and other countries - everyone will start to create it since these countries are fighting for supremacy in the Muslim world, and especially the confrontation between different areas in Islam is doing its job.
What this may lead to a nuclear arms race, given the unstable regimes and fanatics led by them, I think it’s obvious.

Therefore, the point here is not only in Israel and the promise of the Persians to wipe it off the face of the earth and the financing by the Persians of the terrorists around Israel, but in the fact that this will give even greater instability, and so in the explosive region, starting an arms race.

The only thing that stops the appearance of nuclear weapons in some Muslim countries is Iran’s lack of nuclear weapons.

[Ivanov17]

Quote: Wiskar

Quote: rruvim

Does Israel Have Nuclear Weapons? It has. Why can't Iran have it? What are the Persians guilty of? Only one!

I explain a simple truth. The presence of nuclear weapons in Israel does not begin at the beginning of the nuclear arms race, and the presence of nuclear weapons in Iran, as soon as it becomes really known, will lead to an arms race - nuclear weapons will also be in Saudi Arabia and Egypt and other countries - everyone will start to create it since these countries are fighting for supremacy in the Muslim world, and especially the confrontation between different areas in Islam is doing its job.
What this may lead to a nuclear arms race, given the unstable regimes and fanatics led by them, I think it’s obvious.

Therefore, the point here is not only in Israel and the promise of the Persians to wipe it off the face of the earth and the financing by the Persians of the terrorists around Israel, but in the fact that this will give even greater instability, and so in the explosive region, starting an arms race.

The only thing that stops the appearance of nuclear weapons in some Muslim countries is Iran’s lack of nuclear weapons.

Pakistan also has a nuclear bomb. Fight in the world has become less? Weapons in the Middle East in bulk and without nuclear bombs. The main thing is that there are fewer "zionist" lawyers who have lawyers like you

[Wiskar]

I thought you had nothing to write about the case.
I write about one thing, you write about the other at all and write without even understanding what.
It's sad

[rruvim]

Anecdote in the topic:
Trump wakes up in his Trump House. To him a PR man:
"Sir. Before your inauguration, you must make a speech about your foreign policy, what threats America faces. Here is a list ..."
Trump reads:
"Russia, Iran, China, DPRK, ISIS, California".
Trump: "Well, perhaps I would put Russia in sixth place."
PR man - confused "And who is the first ...?"
Trump: "I guess ... California."

[mitrich]

Yes, the Americans will not remove sanctions from Iran, do not go to a fortuneteller. The same Trump, very ill-disposed towards the Persians, in a compartment with the Senate Congresses. The Iranians now need to purchase more of our weapons, do their urgent business and without advertising, start a new one. And as it pops up, send amers tries and continue the work.

[padded jacket]

I hope if, nevertheless, the Treaty on the Iranian nuclear issue is torn apart by the United States, we will not "slow down" again but will start supplying him with weapons and try to "tie" him to our country as close as possible by creating a blog Russia-Syria-Iran-Iraq-Lebanon and not the same mistake as in Ukraine, avoiding the problems of our neighbor by allowing a hostile regime to come to power there.

[Old26]

Quote: Gormengast

The voivode "is still on alert, but why did they not extend the service life of the Scalpel? Or was the solid fuel of such poor quality?"

The fuel was of high quality. But it has the property of cracking during long-term use. Unlike the Americans, we cannot even now change the solid fuel in "old" rockets on an industrial scale. And even more so in the early 2000s. That's why they wrote off

Quote: Thunderbolt

Vladimir, why is it not profitable for the United States? Israel and the Saudi monarchies are hostile towards Iran, and they are also strategic partners of the United States. ?

Not everything can be measured in prices. Not a single country, nor the Americans, nor we need the emergence of a new nuclear power. Moreover, another power, where the clergy plays the main role. Today it does not say that Israel must be wiped off the face of the earth, it does not say that the United States is big, and Russia is small Satan. But can we guarantee that everything will continue to be fine in our relations with Iran?

He, like any large regional country, has his own interests in the region. In particular, in the countries of Transcaucasia and Central Asia. Where can these interests lead them in the future and can they not come across ours? Can you definitely guarantee that this will not happen? Personally, I do not.

Everything is clear with the Americans. The Persian Gulf is a tidbit for them, a source of oil, and the local governments there are often their vassals.
But Iran is far from the United States. Europe is already "covered" with Iranian missile systems. USA - no. Our territory is already under the gun of even the existing missiles of Iran, right up to Moscow. Do we need it?

Quote: mitrich

Yes, the Americans will not remove sanctions from Iran, do not go to a fortuneteller. The same Trump, very ill-disposed towards the Persians, in a compartment with the Senate Congresses. The Iranians now need to purchase more of our weapons, do their urgent business and without advertising, start a new one. And as it pops up, send amers tries and continue the work.

Let's not guess "on the coffee grounds" whether Trump is lifting the sanctions or not. Otherwise, after Obama's arrival, there were also hopes that, on the contrary, he would act differently from the way he acted in real life.

Quote: quilted jacket

I hope if, nevertheless, the Treaty on the Iranian nuclear issue is torn apart by the United States, we will not "slow down" again but will start supplying him with weapons and try to "tie" him to our country as close as possible by creating a blog Russia-Syria-Iran-Iraq-Lebanon and not the same mistake as in Ukraine, avoiding the problems of our neighbor by allowing a hostile regime to come to power there.

Yeah, of course you have Napoleonic plans. Built on a simple principle - they are against America, then our allies. Moreover, they took all the Muslim countries. And you want to create block (not a blog) without even paying attention to their religious differences. But will the Iranians want to fight shoulder to shoulder with the Iraqis. In the recent past, they fought each other for almost a decade. It is good that they did not yet possess nuclear weapons, only chemical ones. And you take the block as a basis in which Russia will be assigned the role of supporting most of these countries ... Or just because the United States needs to be annoyed with something? And having received nuclear weapons and modern technology, are you sure that Iran will not go to the North? Central Asia and the Caucasus are a tidbit for them. And to hope that Iran will not expand in this direction is extremely stupid ...

Quote: mr.redpartizan

The missile for the BZHRK was produced at Yuzhmash, like the Voevoda, so the train had to be removed from service. Not all railway tracks could withstand the old BZHRK with a 100-ton rocket on board; heavy wear and tear of the tracks occurred on the tracks. "Barguzin" will carry on board a rocket weighing up to 50 tons and use only one locomotive instead of three, and the smaller dimensions and weight of the rocket will significantly improve the camouflage of the rocket train and avoid accelerated rail wear.

Yes, not all paths could withstand. But measures were taken in the zones of operation of the complexes, rails and sleepers were replaced, several hundred field positions were built.
In terms of tactics, using one locomotive with six missiles is a worse option than previously three locomotives with three missiles. Not to mention that, frankly, I see no reason to fence a garden for the sake of one division. Okay, in the USSR they planned 7, deploying 3

[padded jacket]

Quote: Old26

And you want to create a block (not a blog)

Another "literate" perhaps?

Quote: Old26

without even paying attention to their religious differences

And where are the religious differences?
You certainly do not know, but it was mainly Sunni Syria that supported Shiite Iran in the Iran-Iraq war.

Quote: Old26

But will the Iranians want to fight shoulder to shoulder with the Iraqis.

Now that Shiites are in power there, they get along fine.

Quote: Old26

Moreover, take the block as a basis in which Russia will be assigned the role of containing most of these countries.

Both Iran and Iraq are completely self-sufficient states with huge oil and gas reserves.

Quote: Old26

Or just because you need to annoy the United States with something?

Well, it is understandable for people like you, the main thing is more shekels, euro dollars, a higher standard of living for them, you are ready to "sell" everything, including the country where you were born.

Quote: Old26

And having received nuclear weapons and modern technology, are you sure that Iran will not go to the North?

It’s good for you to sell weapons to no one, because then they can go with him to our country, right?
A completely short-sighted and even "flawed" position must be created in countries where we sell weapons of our allies and help them come to power there.

[Stinger]

Babama decided to kick in the end. So they want Iran to get hold of nuclear weapons.

[Wiskar]

It was necessary to bomb Iran, and not to sign an agreement ...


Obama used Russia since it was Obama who began the behind-the-scenes negotiations with Iran behind everyone’s back, including the allies.

Then Obama, knowing that Russia is an ally of Iran, and that Russia in any case will support the lifting of sanctions from Iran, easily signed an agreement and lifted sanctions at the UN to further spoil the Muslim world, since he did not give all possible means to strike Iran and thereby many Muslim countries such as the Saudis, and Israel itself is forced to purchase weapons from the United States since Iran has now become an even greater threat.

It turns out conveniently and the United States used Russia for its plans, and most importantly, read the reaction here commentators- protect Iran. Russians consider Iran an ally, commentators here defend Iran.
This is what Obama sought when he used Russia to lift sanctions.

Russia, of course, also removes foam here with projects in Iran, but other Western countries also rushed to pour money into Iran.

However, who now sells gas and oil to Europe and other countries such as China and creates competition for Russia? Iran ... As soon as the sanctions were lifted, Iran began to sharply increase production and offer cheap prices in order to maximally occupy the market. Russia fell into Obama’s trap because it couldn’t vote against the lifting of sanctions and now Iran puts Russia in the wheel and tries to maximize production and supply wherever possible.

[Old26]

Quote: quilted jacket

Another "literate" perhaps?

No, I just try to write without mistakes, and I don’t like when others distort the language. What you suggested by the blog cannot be just a block. And I, if they make comments to me regarding spelling, do not meet with hostility.

Quote: quilted jacket

And where are the religious differences?
You certainly do not know, but it was mainly Sunni Syria that supported Shiite Iran in the Iran-Iraq war.

I know. At the same time, having received the enemy at their borders. And if it were not for the support of the USSR, it is not known how all this would end for Syria.

Quote: quilted jacket

Now that Shiites are in power there, they get along fine.

Absolutely correctly noticed: NOW. What will happen in 3-4 years no one knows. This is still the East. And he, as you know, is a delicate matter.

Quote: quilted jacket

Both Iran and Iraq are completely self-sufficient states with huge oil and gas reserves.

What is the use of these stocks if they cannot be traded on the world market. In addition, destroyed Iraq, in which chaos is now, destroyed Syria, in which there is a war (as in Iraq), Lebanon, in which it is still quiet. And are you going to have two countries in the allies with the war going on in them? More or less, only Iran stands out against this background. It has its very poor but military industry. Everything else is parasites. What is Syria, what is Iran. We will have to work hard to end these databases with ISIS and Al Qaeda. Then restore the industrial and military potential of these countries. This will take years and trillions. So dismiss such block allies. We must have military-technical cooperation with Iran, but without fanaticism.

Quote: quilted jacket

Well, it is understandable for people like you, the main thing is more shekels, euro dollars, a higher standard of living for them, you are ready to "sell" everything, including the country where you were born.

Wouldn’t you shut up, padded jacket ??? Here are the labels to hang on those who disagree with you, you learned. To think with your head that others may have an opinion different from yours - alas, no ...

Quote: quilted jacket

It’s good for you to sell weapons to no one, because then they can go with him to our country, right?
A completely short-sighted and even "flawed" position must be created in countries where we sell weapons of our allies and help them come to power there.

I wrote somewhere that you can’t sell to anyone? AND? But before you sell, you need to think what you are selling: a machine gun, an anti-aircraft complex or ballistic missiles. And we must consider not only the momentary benefits of such cooperation, but also the long-term ones. And I don’t smile at having a nuclear state that is unpredictable 7 hundred kilometers away. Now it seems to be for us (although this is deceptive), tomorrow it is against.

We already created allies in the 60-80s. As soon as some leader, sometimes with cannibalistic manners, declares that he is following the path of socialism and a flow of weapons and money was provided for him from the USSR. Then this ally threw the USSR and another appeared. so I am totally "FOR MYSIGHT POSITION". Not to sell weapons to just anyone, sell only what cannot be turned against us, and the main thing is not to sell thoughtlessly, but to analyze everything.
Do you think that Syria is such an ally for us that they will be ready for fire and water for our sake? You are mistaken. They need us while we cover them from the possible aggression of the West and spread rot for their enemies, which they themselves could not cope with. What their gratitude may be can be judged by the history of the creation of the base in Syria in the late 70s, early 80s (Assad’s father’s attitude towards us) and Assad’s reaction, when he blocked us the opportunity to use the MTO point in Turtuse. So I prefer to have a shortsighted position.

[Operator]

РћС „РёС † РёР ° Р” СЊРЅРѕ Р Р¤ СЃС ‡ итР° РµС ‚Р ° СЃР ° РґРѕРІСЃРєСѓСЋ РЎРёСЂРёСЋ ситуР° тивны Рј СЃРЅРЋСј. Поэтому РјС ‹РЅРµ Р ± удем РИРєР» Р ° РґС ‹РІР ° ть средствР° РЅРСРСРСРРеееееееееддЀддЀЀЀдЀдЀдддддддЀддддддддддддР

РќР ° С € Р ° РіР »Р ° РІРЅР ° СЏ С † ел СЊ РЅР ° Р'Р »РёР¶РЅРµРј Р'остоке - РЎР ° СѓРґРѕРІСЃРєР ° СЏ РђСЂР ° РІРёРёРЏР ° РІСЃРµ остР° Р »СЊРЅС‹ Рµ - РїСЂРѕРјРµР¶СѓС‚РѕС З РЅС ‹Рµ.

[Sars]

Quote: Skeptic Self-taught

And we are liberalizing, how can ... they might be offended ...

We do not liberalize, we have liberals in power .. Therefore, by the way, the Iranians do not have full confidence in us.

We are playing a confrontation with America, with the Ukrainians, and what we have, that they have the same people in power, are put up by those with whom (supposedly) confrontation.