How Solonin proletariat enlightened. Part of 5
But the security of 746 "twos" (someone obviously has problems with arithmetic) makes Solonin after a dozen pages to reconsider his "classification". True, with a big caveat: “In German tanks, even in the lightest Pz-II, armor is 30 mm thick, and in the Soviet T-26 only 15 — 10 mm. The BT-7 is slightly better - from 22 to 13 mm (here it should be taken into account that the BT-7 of the 1935 model of the year had 13 mm in the forehead and along the sides. - Note by author.). The number of 30 is twice the number of 15. And three times the number of 10. Does this mean that German tanks were more protected from enemy fire? To answer this question is extremely simple. It is necessary and sufficient to recall what kind of fire German tanks waited on the Eastern Front ”(p. 188). Further, strictly speaking, we are talking about our "magic" 45-mm anti-tank guns, which turned the 30-mm armor "Panzernikov" in anti-bullet ...
As for the firepower of Pz.II, in this regard the “expert opinion” of Corned beef is even more ruthless: “By its ballistic characteristics it was somewhat inferior to the parameters of the Soviet anti-tank 20-mm gun of Degtyarev. So the most accurate name for the new German “tank” Pz-II would be “a self-propelled anti-tank gun with a machine gun.” To perform the main tasks of the tank - the destruction of fire weapons, fortifications and enemy manpower - a projectile weighing in 14,5 — 120 g carrying (in different versions) from 145 to 4 g of explosive was negligibly weak ”(p. 20).
Firstly, this “useless” 20-mm gun was automatic, and, moreover, it was capable of firing in bursts, and with a single cartridge (for better accuracy).
Secondly, in the ammunition "twos" were shells with tungsten-carbide core (ammunition was called Panzergranatpatrone 40), can successfully fight the best at that time light tanks of the world - the Soviet BT-7 sample 1937 years and BT-7M diesel versions ( most protected among the “high-speed tanks”).
Third, the list of main combat missions assigned to light tanks never included the destruction of enemy field fortifications. The development of success after breaking through the enemy defenses, raids on its rear, reconnaissance in force, and the fight against infantry — that is the purpose of the “lightweights. Accordingly, the combat value of a vehicle representing this class of tanks is determined primarily by its dynamic characteristics (which, of course, does not cancel other parameters). How can we once again fail to recall the outstanding “expert” of military science and technology, Vladimir Rezun, who discerned the predatory grin of Stalinism in our “beteshkas”: “The main advantage of the BT tank is speed. This quality was dominant over the other qualities so much so that even the name of the tank was rendered - fast. BT is an aggressor tank. In all its characteristics, the BT resembles a small, but exclusively mobile, equestrian warrior from the innumerable hordes of Genghis Khan ”(Victor Suvorov, Ledokol, edition of 2007 of the year, p. 13).
Fourth, the comparison of the "main gun" Pz. II with the anti-tank gun Degtyarev (PTDD) is also incorrect because the development of the latter began only after the German attack on the USSR. The same applies to PTRS (Simonov). Soviet rifle divisions at the time of the Nazi invasion were not equipped with this kind weapons. The Germans were quite different: the Wehrmacht infantry division had an anti-tank rifle in 81 states. The main one was the PzB 39, the bullet of which pierced 20-mm armor from a distance of 300 meters.
"The difference between the Soviet and German cars was only in the fact that the bullet-proof booking of the" hopelessly outdated "Soviet light tanks T-26 (in road performance they were noticeably inferior to the German" two ". - Note by the author) and BT were rational, meeting the criteria “Reasonable sufficiency” (for protection against small arms fire, armor was quite enough in 10 — 15 mm) ”. ("Brainstorm. Fake story Great War ", p. 188.) No matter how strange it may sound, but anti-tank rifles are small arms ...
To be continued ...
Information