Military Review

Washington still believes that the main goal of Moscow in Syria is not at all the struggle against IS

48
The White House still believes that Russia is fighting in Syria mainly with the opposition, and not with the terrorist group IG (banned in the Russian Federation), reports RIA News Statement by Assistant US National Security President Susan Rice.




In her opinion, the struggle of the Russian military against the IS is “only a side effect”.

“Indeed, they (Russia) inflicted some blows on the IS, some blows, according to their statement, fell on Al-Qaeda, but their actions are quite clear: to support (President Syrian Bashar) Al-Assad and remove the opposition, most of which moderate, not extremist opposition ",
Rice said.

“They declare that they, like us, have a common interest in defeating IS. I think they have such an interest as a minor because they are close to Syria, and there is a risk that Chechens and others who came to fight in Syria will return again to Russian territory. But if you look at how they distributed their efforts and resources, then it is clear that they mostly support Assad, who randomly pursues the opposition, ”she added.
Photos used:
http://turist-v-amerike.ru
48 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. cniza
    cniza 28 November 2016 08: 26
    +18
    Fools were fools and die ... no one will persuade you.
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 28 November 2016 08: 31
      +14
      The gentlemen in Washington judge by themselves, and therefore make such worthless statements.
      1. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 28 November 2016 08: 48
        +9
        Quote: Thought Giant
        The gentlemen in Washington judge by themselves, and therefore make such worthless statements.

        Washington still believes that the main goal of Moscow in Syria is not at all the struggle against IS
        Washington still believes that Moscow's main task in general is to destroy itself and its country. So, how beautiful it was - Gorbachev, Yeltsin - the country collapsed even without America's help ... The stump is clear, then we were good for them and "achieved the right goals" ...

        God forbid we again set ourselves the right, from the point of view of America, goals .... am
        1. electrooleg
          electrooleg 28 November 2016 10: 56
          +1
          What opposition is interesting with? The second year, we ask you to show the opposition - they are silent! laughing
    2. 210ox
      210ox 28 November 2016 08: 48
      +6
      About the fools .. it is still not clear where they are .. In us or in Washington .. We are going to all sorts of persuasions like the last Buratins .. Beating without stopping! No "khasavyurt"!
      1. Siberian 142
        Siberian 142 28 November 2016 09: 01
        +1
        That's right !! Fushington is in intensive negotiations with Lavrov to end the siege of Aleppo. They even pulled Qatar, S. Arabia and Turkey to put more pressure on us.
    3. Finches
      Finches 28 November 2016 08: 49
      +3
      Why are you fools? This is the conscious policy of the current Washington administration aimed at distorting reality! The belittling of Russia's role in the fight against ISIS and its exaltation, but now such statements are aimed solely in order to leave the heaviest foreign policy legacy to the incoming president!
      1. novel66
        novel66 28 November 2016 09: 30
        +3
        and even so - what is their canine business?
  2. Wolka
    Wolka 28 November 2016 08: 30
    +2
    the problem of the Yankees is that in assessing certain international conflicts, they measure the situation by their own "yardstick" and at the same time exclude any alternative points of view, this is treated, but with a lot of blood
    1. Alexdark
      Alexdark 28 November 2016 09: 22
      0
      You all say that, amicably, as if you really think that they are such fools, strange people, when will it reach them? How would I reach them then?
      This is how it looks. Although a fool has understood and understood for a long time, this is a special policy of the "smart" designed for "fools". And not vice versa. Cheating is a high art, fools are not capable of cheating.
  3. IGOR GORDEEV
    IGOR GORDEEV 28 November 2016 08: 33
    +1
    It seems that their "democratic" attacks on the actions of Russia in Syria have passed into the stage of boltology. When Aleppo is taken, they may be drawn to philosophy.
  4. Flinky
    Flinky 28 November 2016 08: 34
    +3
    Chet somehow without a spark, sadly.
    1. novel66
      novel66 28 November 2016 09: 32
      +3
      So the record is hackneyed, lope Mona? disgusting themselves, psaki need to be lively
  5. ImPerts
    ImPerts 28 November 2016 08: 39
    +12
    Ours do not see the fundamental difference between moderate and immoderate terrorists.
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 28 November 2016 08: 54
      +3
      Quote: ImPerts
      Ours do not see the fundamental difference between moderate and immoderate terrorists.

      True, it was a long time ago, but we, for example, were not taught to see the difference. Who shoots - that and the terrorist. But then they were called terrorists extremely rarely. Does the title matter? It is precisely by name that the Americans want to whirl us right now in order to save at least part of their pupils .... Therefore, with all the caricature and the Western idea of ​​the ever-drunk Russian Ivan, the third image is correct.
      1. ImPerts
        ImPerts 28 November 2016 09: 07
        +1
        Left my comment.
        This is not our image, not ours ...
        1. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 28 November 2016 09: 21
          +3
          Quote: ImPerts
          Left my comment.
          This is not our image, not ours ...

          Our. Because we were taught to stifle villains no matter what they are called. And America, I repeat, wants to simply confuse us in the names in order to preserve at least a part of its nourishment and get out of this porridge with a booty minimally smeared with smelly jam ... Just let it try the American (not even English !!!) language with Russian to compete in imagery and semantics reach out! Children, damn it ...
  6. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 28 November 2016 08: 39
    +3
    It turns out for the United States the opposition fighting against the legitimate authorities and killing civilians with terrorists in one bottle, as our politicians have enough nerves to talk with mattresses.
    1. Morrow
      Morrow 28 November 2016 09: 27
      +1
      There is no IS in Aleppo, but there is in Mosul.
      1. novel66
        novel66 28 November 2016 09: 34
        +3
        it seems to me that Mosul and Aleppo are communicating vessels
  7. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
    Alexander Abdrakhmanov 28 November 2016 08: 42
    +2
    Of course, they will always blame Russia, it destroys the American allies of the IHL. All reports come to the United States, directly from them. What a maniac from the USA - will tell us the truth. Themselves to the elbow in the blood, and even Russia is called the enemy. Let everyone throw their dust in the eyes, as if they themselves were not blinded by this dust.
  8. Demeter
    Demeter 28 November 2016 08: 49
    +2
    Well, Washington doesn’t give a damn about what Russophobia sufferers think there. I have not been expecting good things from there for a long time.
  9. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 28 November 2016 08: 50
    +3
    Yes! absolutely yes! we help Assad to preserve Syria as a state! we help Assad to save the people of Syria and a little bit through the destruction of the barmalei
  10. Fagelov
    Fagelov 28 November 2016 08: 55
    +3
    Quote: ImPerts
    Ours do not see the fundamental difference between moderate and immoderate terrorists.

    There is still a difference. Moderate people cut off their heads in a moderate hurry, while moderates cut off their heads a little faster.
    1. ImPerts
      ImPerts 28 November 2016 09: 06
      +2
      Not excluded, but still cut. Like a boy who was accused of working for Assad. For Americans, they were moderate oppositionists and freedom fighters.
      http://rusvesna.su/news/1468939999
  11. ImPerts
    ImPerts 28 November 2016 09: 01
    +4
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    . Therefore, with all the caricature and the Western idea of ​​the ever-drunk Russian Ivan, the third image is correct.

    Wrong image. Therefore deleted it. Our image is polite little men in green)))
    1. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 28 November 2016 09: 58
      +5
      Quote: ImPerts
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      . Therefore, with all the caricature and the Western idea of ​​the ever-drunk Russian Ivan, the third image is correct.

      Wrong image. Therefore deleted it. Our image is polite little men in green)))
      A good image, but there is better. And Europe needs to remember him. Forget it - recall.e.
      1. ImPerts
        ImPerts 29 November 2016 05: 52
        0
        Great look!
  12. ibu355yandex.ru
    ibu355yandex.ru 28 November 2016 09: 06
    +4
    Well, explain to me, please, how an armed opposition, howling with its legitimate Government, can be "moderate" !!! It's not even double standards ...
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 28 November 2016 09: 27
      +1
      Quote: ibu355yandex.ru
      explain to me, please, how an armed opposition, howling with its legitimate Government, can be "moderate"!

      The normal visitor does not know this. Try to get advice from the "users" = Hapfrey, Asinki Opelsinki, Simpsonian, Cartalon, or the "chosen people" from the "users" Professor or Atalef.
      1. novel66
        novel66 28 November 2016 09: 38
        +2
        here the nuances are important - if only with the government - it’s moderate, but how do they begin to misbehave, adults don’t obey - definitely a terrorist (or not?)
      2. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 28 November 2016 10: 36
        +2
        Quote: V.ic
        Try to get advice from the "users" = Hapfrey, Asinki Opelsinki, Simpsonian, Cartalon, or the "chosen people" from the "users" Professor or Atalef.

        These will tell .... It's a pity, after all, that the cons were canceled on the topvar! At least there was an opportunity for any troll to say his "fi" .....
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 November 2016 09: 21
    +1
    Naturally, Russia in Syria pursues its own goals. But still the main thing is the fight against terrorism. And it's not our fault that the so-called. "moderates" behave like ISIS, and therefore must be destroyed. The Americans are counting the money thrown to the wind and therefore rage.
  15. Stariknv
    Stariknv 28 November 2016 09: 22
    0
    Judging by the US statement, they are fighting a legitimate government with the help of terrorist organizations created by themselves to establish their own selfish goals.
  16. Galleon
    Galleon 28 November 2016 09: 27
    +3
    What I love about the film "Kin-dza-dza" - quotes for all occasions laughing
    Washington still believes that the main goal of Moscow in Syria is not at all the struggle against IS

    - Comrade, there is one person saying that he is an alien.
    - Call at 03!
    “I'll call you, only he’s completely barefoot.” Catch a cold.


    And here we can only call an ambulance to call this Washington.
    It is a pity that our "polite people" in white coats do not go
    1. cap
      cap 28 November 2016 11: 36
      0
      Quote: Galleon
      It is a pity that our "polite people" in white coats do not go


      Go in winter laughing
  17. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 28 November 2016 09: 46
    +1
    The entire world community knows that ISIS and the so-called "opposition" are indistinguishable. Freaks, posing as exceptional, were asked a hundred times - distinguish between controlled degenerates! As long as the Wahhabite runs from ISIS to the opposition, everyone will receive. I took a machine gun illegally? - Get it! am
  18. weksha50
    weksha50 28 November 2016 09: 50
    +2
    "The White House still believes that Russia fights in Syria mainly with the opposition, not with the IS terrorist group"...

    Hmm ... America was discovered ...
    Russia combines the "pleasant" with the useful ... Destroys IS and supports the Assad regime ... And never concealed its goals and intentions ... Only in the White House were they able to alter, turn over and paraphrase in their own way what Russia is doing in Syria. .. We call by their names the opponents of the Assad regime, and the United States calls them the opposition ...
    And the IS - as they say, flies and meatballs - separately ... IS and the real opposition to Assad are different things, but at the moment they are a joint, accumulated clot of armed violence in a friendly country and get what they deserve ...
  19. zlideny
    zlideny 28 November 2016 09: 58
    0
    Everyone understands that in Syria the war is going on primarily not with ISIS but because of oil, and only then with terrorists. The Americans created this gang to pump out free oil and thereby lowering world prices we were put on the ass and we had nowhere to put up with and so the old people make ends meet barely barely make it. We’ll break through anything.
  20. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 28 November 2016 10: 00
    +1
    But if you look at how they distributed their efforts and resources, it is clear that they mainly support Assad, who randomly pursues the opposition, ”she added.

    Yeah ....... That damn thing in Iraq and Libya after the overthrow of the leaders during American intervention, order and prosperity came .... I would have been silent in a rag ...
  21. vmo
    vmo 28 November 2016 10: 43
    +1
    The diagnosis was made long ago, why not in a madhouse?
  22. Amurets
    Amurets 28 November 2016 11: 27
    +1
    “They declare that they, like us, have a common interest in defeating IS. I think they have such an interest as a minor because they are close to Syria, and there is a risk that Chechens and others who came to fight in Syria will return again to Russian territory. But if you look at how they distributed their efforts and resources, then it is clear that they mostly support Assad, who randomly pursues the opposition, ”she added.

    Even the Yankees cannot determine where they have an orthodox opposition and where not an orthodox? So may Allah divide them into right and wrong. God the God, Caesar Caesarean.
  23. Vasilij Pereira
    Vasilij Pereira 28 November 2016 16: 50
    0
    Whatever the name of the destroyers, they, all the same, will not become creators. So, ISIS and the "moderate opposition" are just the right and left hands of the main destroyer - the United States. They will break off these "arms", make other "prostheses", but they will not stop destroying the world! And Trump will not change anything in this matter. The state machine is rushing in full swing, and whoever tries to stop it will die first!
  24. prior
    prior 28 November 2016 17: 01
    0
    And correctly considers.
    A military base in Syria and control over the region, gas, oil, logistics, other goodies ... and this is just for starters. It will be necessary to introduce a no-fly zone.
    And we’ll come to Cuba, to Camran, to the Philippines ...
    Katz has long offered to give up ...
  25. Orionvit
    Orionvit 28 November 2016 19: 32
    0
    The White House still believes that Russia is fighting in Syria mainly with the opposition, and not with the IS terrorist group (banned in the Russian Federation
    What's the difference?
  26. razved
    razved 28 November 2016 20: 20
    0
    It is necessary to spit from a high bell tower on all their statements, especially on such.
  27. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 28 November 2016 22: 19
    0
    what a rare game
  28. Navigator Basov
    Navigator Basov 29 November 2016 22: 47
    0
    Wow, I love double standards: you can always do it like this, and it’s even more reliable than the original.

    The Kremlin still believes that the US is fighting in Syria mainly with the Syrian armed forces, and not with the IS terrorist group. Moscow still believes that Washington’s main goal in Syria is not to fight IS at all. In her opinion, the struggle of the US military with the IS is "only a side effect."

    So no one even considers it, everyone knows it, because the USA openly declares this.
    Indeed, they (the USA) carried out some attacks on the Islamic State, some attacks, according to their statement, fell on two excavators, but their actions are quite clear: support the opposition and remove (President of Syria Bashar) Assad, most of whom are the legitimate head of state, officially asked for military assistance from Russia, and not international interventionists.
    They claim that they, like us, have a common interest in defeating the IG. I think they have such an interest as secondary, since they are far away from Syria, and there is no risk that the blacks and others who came to fight in Syria will return to American territory again. But if you look at how they distributed their efforts and resources, it is clear that they mainly support the opposition, which randomly persecutes Assad.

    In general, one gets the impression that Psaki sat in the office, clarifies everything in half, and writes texts for all American government departments. Indeed, of course, the proximity of Syria and the risk of the return of Wahhabis to Chechnya is not a threat of international terrorism, therefore, the state security of Russia does not suffer at all.