China has announced the creation of a new version of the salvo fire system

79
China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO) has officially announced the creation of an upgraded version of the MLRS SR4, reports MIC with reference to janes.com.

China has announced the creation of a new version of the salvo fire system




SR4 was first introduced in 2012 g, and then repeatedly demonstrated at the exhibition. It has been reported that the 4 installer acquired Thailand.

“SR4 is built on a Shaanxi SX2190KA 6 × 6 off-road truck and is equipped with a swivel unit with two 20-charging rocket launchers of 122 caliber mm. The four-door SR4 cab is protected by special shutters, which allows launching rockets without turning the starting block, ”writes resource.

All 40 missiles are fired in 30 seconds.

According to the report, the updated version of the combat vehicle "is equipped with a modern fire control system that allows, among other things, to select the type of projectile using voice commands." There are 7 types of solid propellant rockets used by the installation. These include fragmentation, incendiary, missiles with a combined warhead, as well as mining shells and a volume explosion. The maximum range of the missiles is 50 km.



The weight of the renewed combat vehicle is about 20 t, the crew is a 3 man (previously, the SR4 crew consisted of 5 fighters). MLRS also gained the ability to recharge by replacing the block with guides, which reduced the preparation time for the next salvo 2 times (from 10 to 5 minutes).
  • janes.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    25 November 2016 15: 20
    The Chinese are masters of plagiarism ... nothing new but under different letters.
    1. +4
      25 November 2016 15: 23
      New version with old holes.))))
    2. +3
      25 November 2016 15: 29
      Deck, they not only "rested" from the Russians, but something from the Kazakh-Israeli project NAYZA.
      https://topwar.ru/35000-rezultat-sotrudnichestva-
      izrailya-i-kazakhstana-reaktivnaya-sistema-zalpovo
      go-ognya-nayza.html
      1. +4
        25 November 2016 15: 34
        No one has claimed theft yet?
        1. +2
          25 November 2016 15: 36
          Quote: Thought Giant
          No one has claimed theft yet?

          Not yet. laughing The modularity of the FIGs with it, but the LMS, interesting.
    3. +5
      25 November 2016 15: 38
      Uh ... And how can plagiarism make a product better than the original?
      1. +8
        25 November 2016 16: 00
        The Chinese have learned and "retrained" 50 km, by the way, on one block of 24 missiles, and not 20, in any case from the photo, and even a quick reload, you can certainly laugh further, but what do we have to answer?
        1. +8
          25 November 2016 16: 19
          I like the Chinese approach.
          Want an analogue of the BM-21 with accelerated loading? You are welcome. Do you want 2 bags on rails, and two on a machine with a cargo arm for reloading? You are welcome. Want a tracked base? You are welcome. Want a multi-caliber that can use these modules? Yes please. Every whim for your money.

          The same goes for ammunition. And they offer classics, and with a block of a gas-dynamic pulse system of path correction, and controlled along the entire path ... The main thing is that potential customers have enough money, the rest is nonsense.

          The same goes for the "service staff". Starting with vehicles for forward observers in goose / wheel / light tactical vehicle variants. And ending with maintenance vehicles, meteo and ballistic radars ...
          1. +2
            25 November 2016 16: 48
            Quote: Spade
            I like the Chinese approach.

            I respect them the same way, not long ago our flea markets were burning, redistribution of property. People who traded the goods were in trouble. We will supply debt to the Chinese. We don’t go bankrupt again.
            Here for auto parts, not a problem that interests you.
            They have well-developed public-private partnerships, loans at low interest rates and insurance under force majeure circumstances, the main thing is to export finished products from the country.
            1. +5
              25 November 2016 17: 19
              we would have such an attitude towards our "self-employed" ... but no, as soon as our state security thinks about their entrepreneurs, even in words, they start to shake - what other fantasies came to mind of our "great economists" like Ulyukaev? belay
              He said more than once - you don’t need to love small business, he will die at the foreplay recourse
              1. +1
                25 November 2016 17: 30
                Quote: Yuyuka
                we would have such an attitude towards our "self-employed" ... but no, as soon as our state security thinks about their entrepreneurs, even in words, they start to shake - what other fantasies came to mind of our "great economists" like Ulyukaev?
                He said more than once - you don’t need to love small business, he will die at the foreplay

                In our KZ, it’s a little simpler, but there are preferential loans from the fund, the same ones are spinning, mowing a couple of lard for the small and medium ones, but they can help but roll back or accredit yourself ..
                Yes, grace to take at the present time, it’s just to kill your future.
                Quote: Yuyuka
                He said more than once - you don’t need to love small business, he will die at the foreplay

                Agree to all 100.500
          2. +1
            25 November 2016 17: 34
            Quote: Spade
            I like the Chinese approach

            And after all, many solutions do not need any super technologies, the same packages, modularity has long been invented, you just need to use it.
        2. +1
          25 November 2016 19: 04
          how to answer ??? "Hurricanes" and "Tornadoes", why does the Grad need such a range if there is already another technique with different purposes, and it would be strange if they did worse or approximately the same technique than the analogue that was developed in the mid-50s .. .you thought about it ???
          1. +2
            25 November 2016 20: 46
            Quote: RUSIVAN
            how to answer ??? "Hurricanes" and "Tornadoes

            You can of course and poplar gasp.
            Quote: RUSIVAN
            , why does the Grad need such a range if there is already another technique with different purposes,

            Well, from my sofa point of view, a range of 16 km today does not allow one to feel in relative safety can always fly, 50 km in this case is still preferable. Well, a longer range is still an opportunity to cover sections of the fire over a greater length of the contact line, while drive less cars, well, not excluding a change of position.
            Quote: RUSIVAN
            , and it would be strange if they did worse or about the same technique than the analogue that they developed in the mid-50s ... did you think about that ???

            I agree this is just not strange, the strange thing is that those who developed these analogues in the 50s today haven’t moved too far from the original standard.
            1. mmk
              0
              26 November 2016 22: 46
              Chinese product in action amiable.
              youtube.com/watch?v=q_zlpA3ylJA

              Given the number of volleys in the cassette, this machine can blaze up very quickly and also give out its place of deployment at the time of the volley.
        3. +1
          26 November 2016 19: 29
          and what do you think ? left to right or vice versa? otherwise I don’t get 24
      2. +2
        25 November 2016 16: 09
        Quote: Spade
        Uh ... And how can plagiarism make a product better than the original?

        The question and the answer are none. Only make an external copy, and the filling - how it goes ... That's how they live ... I wrote above about Kalash ...
    4. +2
      25 November 2016 16: 08
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      The Chinese are masters of plagiarism ... nothing new but under different letters.

      As usual, liquefied by the USSR and crookedly made. I had to hold in my hands a Katay "Kalashnikov". Not at all, you know, like ours, dear ...
    5. +4
      25 November 2016 16: 09
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      The Chinese are masters of plagiarism ... nothing new

      Quote: hirurg
      New version with old holes.))))

      Guys .. but essentially can you say something?
      Compare our 122 caliber and its range, and what kind of fire control system ... "Grad"
      These include fragmentation, incendiary, missiles with a combined warhead, as well as mining shells and volumetric explosion. The maximum range of missiles is 50 km.

      The volley fire system WM-80 has a caliber of 273 mm and a range of 80 km ...
      there is no time to write and proofs to throw off .. but you can read it on the Internet yourself .. The Chinese are working very hard in this direction.
      1. +2
        25 November 2016 17: 04
        Quote: Scoun
        and what kind of fire control system

        That each machine has a set of coordinates, a Chinese analogue of the JPI ES or GLONAS, and a ballistic computer for existing missiles.
        It is enough to indicate the place with a pen, confirm and that’s all ... A couple of UAVs, and communication with the KShM integrated into the common network.
        It does not manually equip, use cards and beads.
    6. +2
      25 November 2016 16: 48
      RUSIVAN
      "The Chinese are masters of plagiarism ... nothing new but under different letters."
      It can be said in another way ... Let's say ... The Chinese are masters of saving time without spending it on the exploration phase, while creating accordingly cheaper and at the same time competitive samples, yielding to "being proud" of the palm tree of primacy. They will have enough gunpowder and paper for the millennia to maintain "nat, pride".
      1. 0
        25 November 2016 19: 08
        With such total plagiarism among the Chinese, I began to think about it, and did the Chinese even come up with gunpowder with paper if they so easily decide their image.
    7. +1
      25 November 2016 22: 03
      And to the customer what is the difference, plagiarism or not plagiarism. Grind the main enemy quickly.
  2. +3
    25 November 2016 15: 32
    The maximum range of missiles is 50 km.

    I can’t even imagine how accurate unmanaged RSs are at such a range.
    1. +1
      25 November 2016 15: 43
      Quote: Anatol Klim
      I can’t even imagine how accurate unmanaged RSs are at such a range.

      Why uncontrollable?
      1. +2
        25 November 2016 16: 01
        Why uncontrollable?

        BM SR4 ammunition includes unguided rockets with various types of warheads (high-explosive, incendiary, cluster, etc.). It was reported on the development of a projectile with a firing range of up to 50km.
        At the International Airspace Show AirShow China 2014 (11.11.2014/16.11.2014/XNUMX - XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX; Zhuhai China) were demonstrated layouts promising adjustable and guided missiles of 122 mm caliber.
        It is known about two variants of projectiles equipped with a gas-dynamic impulse trajectory correction system unit. The version of the guided projectile with aerodynamic rudders, presented at AirShow China 2014, is made according to the 'duck' scheme. To increase the firing accuracy, the guided projectile is presumably equipped with a satellite navigation system.
        These shells can be used as part of the MLRS SR4 and other models of multiple launch rocket systems caliber 122 mm. Development status is currently unknown. http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/sr4/sr4
        .shtml
        Although I agree, if they want, they will.
    2. 0
      25 November 2016 18: 22
      Quote: Anatol Klim
      The WM-80 has a caliber of 273 mm and a range of 80 km

      You asked a strange question, but the answer in your question is FINITE UNMISSIBLE ACCURACY.
      1. 0
        25 November 2016 18: 33
        Quote: Berkut752
        weird question

        Buddy be careful, you attributed to me a quote from a comment by Scoun.

        Scoun
        The volley fire system WM-80 has a caliber of 273 mm and a range of 80 km ...
        there is no time to write and proofs to throw off .. but you can read it on the Internet yourself .. The Chinese are working very hard in this direction.
        stop hi
    3. +2
      25 November 2016 20: 41
      Quote: Anatole Klim

      I can’t even imagine how accurate unmanaged RSs are at such a range.

      And I can't imagine "voice control" for missiles :)))))
      It will turn out like "Old Man used to sell a tractor" with voice control
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpeJyZUMViE
  3. +2
    25 November 2016 15: 32
    And what's new in this car ?! A method of loading a separate type of missiles on the firing blocks ?! This option was worked out during the Great Patriotic War, on the legendary "Katyusha"! Funny Chinese! )))
    1. +4
      25 November 2016 15: 45
      The "funny Chinese" will reload after a volley an order of magnitude faster than ours.
      1. +1
        25 November 2016 16: 04
        The "funny Chinese" will reload after a volley an order of magnitude faster than ours.

        You count on 50 km what kind of scatter there will be, an unguided projectile?
        1. +1
          25 November 2016 16: 23
          How is Tornado-G?
          1. 0
            25 November 2016 17: 06
            Quote: Spade
            How is Tornado-G?

            Tornado G, it seems you appeared a little later than our Nyza.
            1. +2
              25 November 2016 18: 06
              What's the difference? The principle of correction on the active part of the trajectory was first applied at the "Tornado"
              The Chinese also initially took this path. But when the ranges became really large, and this was not enough, they switched to controllable RS along the entire trajectory. As, for example, on "Polonaise" Belarusian.
              1. 0
                25 November 2016 18: 17
                Quote: Spade
                What's the difference? The principle of correction on the active part of the trajectory was first applied at the "Tornado"
                The Chinese also initially took this path. But when the ranges became really large, and this was not enough, they switched to controllable RS along the entire trajectory. As, for example, on "Polonaise" Belarusian.

                In principle, yes, that’s why our people have an interest in the long-range system, but all the same, not all of us betrayed us.
                By the way, not long ago, a professor showed a monitor of a weather station, I saw it somewhere, I remembered later. This is a mini meteorological station for KShM. smile Short-term infa will not do the weather if it is not related to the Army and Aviation .. We are used to using long-term forecasts. smile
                1. +2
                  25 November 2016 18: 45
                  You can only use ground-based measurements, but the accuracy will be much lower.

                  As for the Israeli MLRS, the principle of using a "test" missile, which is guided by a ballistic radar station, is copied from the FRG.

                  The Chinese offer the user two options, both meteo and ballistic stations. There would be money.
                  1. 0
                    25 November 2016 19: 13
                    Quote: Spade
                    You can only use ground-based measurements, but the accuracy will be much lower.

                    You are talking about meteorology, that there is a thermometer, a thermometer with water, ice, to calculate the humidity, according to the tables. laughing Atmospheric pressure, it can be said not significantly, there are tables, and a slide rule. Here and there, sometimes it was strained in the steppe, and especially in winter, after a snowstorm. Then there’s still a sextant, to get enough. smile
                    Quote: Spade
                    The Chinese offer the user two options, both meteo and ballistic stations. There would be money.

                    Yes, it is clear, by the way, our MLRS is duplicated in the "old-fashioned" way. It's good that we didn't pull out all of the geodetic markers, and they didn't let the power lines be scraped. There are no telegraph and telephone poles anymore, even the stepsons foundations or fittings.
                    1. 0
                      25 November 2016 20: 08
                      Quote: marshes
                      You are about meteorology

                      There are stations like Smiles. They provide information over the entire sounding height. Wind, pressure, temperature, and more.
                      There are wind sounding stations - there is a "bubble" without a payload, that is, only the wind. Everything else is near-surface.
                      There are division level stations. Type DMK, landing meteorological kit. They use only surface data.
                      1. 0
                        25 November 2016 20: 31
                        Quote: Spade
                        There are stations like Smiles. They provide information over the entire sounding height. Wind, pressure, temperature, and more.

                        I heard about it. It’s ancient and uses meteorological probes with reflectors. To understand the full picture at the heights, they release many probes. If it is not integrated into the general network, it’s zero. And it takes a lot of time to process. Go on the punch cards.
                        Quote: Spade
                        There are wind sounding stations - there is a "bubble" without a payload, that is, only the wind. Everything else is near-surface.

                        Yes, what is described above.
                        Quote: Spade
                        There are division level stations. Type DMK, landing meteorological kit. They use only surface data.

                        This is what you need, and according to these data, plus, "simulated history", you need to work.
                        The "vrazhin" know about this and they are processing meteorological data, which is not supplied free of charge by our meteorologists. Even for grants they simulate the weather.
                        To meteorology, I was simply interested because of my friend, to my wife. I was attracted by the beast. laughing And so the failed operation to take hostages in Iran, yes Napoleon Waterloo, lost.
                        In general, ready-made data will not give large corrections when striking.
          2. +2
            25 November 2016 17: 40
            When I adjusted Grad for the first time in my life, the range was 18.3 km, it sprinkled a packet like this (one machine fired), the range spread was 200-300 meters and almost a kilometer along the front. The first impression was strong, I’m farther away from it than at 10 km. So far, of course, I have not seen Tornado G shoot at 40 km. But if the range on it was increased simply by increasing fuel. Of course, I will be very disappointed. But it seems like GK Fusion Makarovets in one of their interviews spoke about the controllability of new shells for G. Tornado
            Let's hope so.
            Does anyone have reliable information? Share your impressions.
            1. +1
              25 November 2016 18: 01
              Quote: RASKAT
              When I first adjusted Grad for the first time in my life

              They do not correct it, it is pointless.
      2. +1
        25 November 2016 19: 15
        If you are really proud of this miracle, then say to the end that the Chinese military vehicle in 2016 will recharge faster than the Russian Grad with the beginning of development in the mid-50s, you would at least have studied the technique to begin with in order to compare the already ancient Grad "and a modern Chinese car ...
        1. +2
          25 November 2016 19: 46
          "Ancient" Grad "and" the most modern "Tornado-G" are charged at almost the same speed.
          1. 0
            26 November 2016 19: 36
            I’m watching videos, how hailstones, having shed their eyes, flow from the positions of the response and I think - but do they have a slower reloading speed in this case? Will the blocks outweigh on the go?
  4. +2
    25 November 2016 15: 35
    It seems that the Chinese firmly want to become in the race of brains and technologies, if not leaders, then at least firmly join the group of leaders. As long as they copy and upgrade other people's thoughts and solutions, but God forbid they get the necessary technologies, which so far it’s not us that the West doesn’t give them — then they will unfold so that in the world the Chinese will have only one competitor — the Chinese.
    1. +2
      25 November 2016 16: 00
      Yes, the Chinese do not put a finger in their mouth, they will immediately grab a hand to the elbow.
    2. +2
      25 November 2016 16: 11
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      It seems that the Chinese firmly want to become in the race of minds and technologies, if not leaders, then at least firmly enter the group of leaders.

      They will become leaders in the race of minds when they learn how to yankes RUSSIAN brains to entice themselves ....
    3. +2
      25 November 2016 16: 15
      such a "step" requires its own school and continuity. jade women prefer to follow the path of "improved copying". I do not exclude the transition of "quantity to quality", but I just do not believe that the "communist-commercial" enterprise of the PRC is capable of creating such a thing. "Can you build a flying ship? - I'll buy it!" Here is their ideology at a given time. What if Trump & Co takes production out of the Middle Kingdom? Eat what will become? They are not us, and they are not even Japs, they will fight at a stroke, you cannot last long on ideology, since there is nothing to eat ..
      But in general, I do not see sufficient reasons to take them as allies. It’s easier to make a new leap in the country than to trust this back ..
      1. +2
        28 November 2016 10: 11
        Quote: Hiss
        They are not us, and not even japas, swing will fight, on ideology you will not last long, since there is nothing to eat ..

        Do not wrangle ... Again they will begin to catch sparrows and put a cast iron smelter in every yard .... And there they will go. laughing laughing laughing The Chinese are an ancient nation. The epochs of civil wars they passed a long time ago. Now - humility, hard work and humility. The highest benefactor. And who is the boss is not important. And it did not start yesterday. Read how a relatively small army of japps captured vast China. And why? Yes, they do not care who is the boss and for whom to work. Confucianism, you know ... It generally does not have any social justice or patriotism ......
    4. 0
      25 November 2016 18: 24
      Quote: Expelling Liberoids
      It seems that the Chinese firmly want to become in the race of brains and technologies, if not leaders, then at least firmly join the group of leaders. As long as they copy and upgrade other people's thoughts and solutions, but God forbid they get the necessary technologies, which so far it’s not us that the West doesn’t give them — then they will unfold so that in the world the Chinese will have only one competitor — the Chinese.

      They already own technologies, but THOUGHTS, not yet.
  5. 0
    25 November 2016 15: 37
    It looks like a BM-11.
  6. +1
    25 November 2016 16: 01
    Immediately I begin to look for an analogue released earlier outside of China smile
  7. +4
    25 November 2016 16: 02
    Prefabricated hodgepodge, they took a hail of ordinary sawn in half, made removable halves and gave out for new ones. Only Previously, the hail could be charged from any vehicle by the crew of the 10-15 minutes, and now the gran will have to be dragged along for reloading. And with a range, they generally did a brilliant thing, stupidly lengthened the rocket, now a rocket with a range of 50 km sticks out almost a meter from the guide (the photo is on the Internet) I can not find. Moreover, the missile is not guided, from there on 50 km the spread will be one and a half kilometers and no less than three kilometers along the front. Wangyu wassat
  8. 0
    25 November 2016 16: 43
    "The maximum range of missiles is 50 km," - FSE, you can close the shop of 152/155 howitzers and 130-mm guns.
    1. +1
      25 November 2016 17: 08
      Quote: Operator
      "The maximum range of missiles is 50 km", - FSE, you can close the shop 152/155 howitzers and 130-mm guns

      fool
      1. 0
        25 November 2016 17: 14
        Why are you so upset - you better ask your Israeli colleagues about the IDF program for folding the 155-mm self-propelled guns and deploying MLRS with guided missiles.
        1. +1
          25 November 2016 17: 15
          Quote: Operator
          And why are you so upset - you better ask your Israeli colleagues about the IDF program for folding 155 mm self-propelled guns and deploying MLRS

          - I repeat: fool
    2. +1
      25 November 2016 18: 32
      Italo-German shell Vulcano. Guided options shoot at 57 km with a 155/39 howitzer, 80 km with a 155/52 howitzer, 100 km with a 127/64 gun
      Three "heads" - purely inertial with correction according to ZhPS, inertial with correction plus semi-active laser, inertial with correction plus passive IR.
      Set before firing, depending on the task.
      When firing at the maximum range of Vd / Vb about 20 meters, when using a semi-active laser or IR in the final section of the Vd / Vb trajectory about 5 meters.
      1. 0
        25 November 2016 19: 31
        So big, and you believe in fairy tales smile
      2. +1
        27 November 2016 00: 37
        The same GOS and guided rudders can be put on anything: rockets, shells, aerial bombs, mortar mines. The issue is price and nothing else.
  9. +2
    25 November 2016 16: 57
    When reading the news about China's latest high-tech military development, one should not forget that Chinese military history is a history of defeats. It’s one thing to do the technique, another is to effectively apply it in a real battle.
    1. 0
      25 November 2016 18: 43
      Quote: yellow
      When reading the news about China's latest high-tech military development, one should not forget that Chinese military history is a history of defeats.

      Awesome of them, the history of defeats, given that most of them are KHANTSY, they crushed the territories quite QUIETLY. And almost without fighting, the wars were but little described .. Inner Mongolia, Tibet, Manchuria, East Turkestan.
      1. +1
        27 November 2016 00: 33
        By the way, they consider the Chingizid empire (once the largest in the world in terms of territory and population) to be their Chinese empire. On the grounds that China was its most technological and crowded part and that the Chinese participated in all the campaigns of the sons of Genghis Khan.
        1. 0
          27 November 2016 02: 29
          Quite the opposite: the vassal dependence of the Russian principalities on the Horde arose in the 1242 year, the vassal dependence of the Russian principalities on the Horde much later in the 1279 year, the Russian Federation occupies the former territory of the Horde, i.e. China is rightfully part of Russia - the Mongols will confirm laughing
  10. 0
    25 November 2016 18: 26
    Quote: activator
    The Chinese have learned and "retrained" 50 km, by the way, on one block of 24 missiles, and not 20, in any case from the photo, and even a quick reload, you can certainly laugh further, but what do we have to answer?

    glasses must be worn when counting.
  11. +1
    25 November 2016 21: 01
    Quote: marshes
    I heard about it. It’s ancient and uses meteorological probes with reflectors. To understand the full picture at the heights, they release many probes. If it is not integrated into the general network, it’s zero. And it takes a lot of time to process. Go on the punch cards.

    With reflectors, this is "SON-2", in fact, these are wind sounding stations.
    But already in the mid-60s, radiosondes appeared that formed a response signal. Initially, ARMS worked with them, then MRK-1 "Mars" worked with similar ones.
    RPMK-1 "Smile" is a new complex, now it is replacing Mars. There are two methods, active - on the response signal (as in aviation), and passive direction finding.
    But it is already being modernized, "Smile-M" passed tests last year. A new computer plus a radar for probeless determination of wind parameters for a more accurate determination at low altitudes, plus more compact, on one machine instead of two
    1. 0
      25 November 2016 21: 16
      Quote: Spade
      But it is already being modernized, "Smile-M" passed tests last year. A new computer plus a radar for probeless determination of wind parameters for a more accurate determination at low altitudes, plus more compact, on one machine instead of two

      But it is more interesting.
      By the way, how to strain the enemy’s radar, it’s a joke. Running a mass order of condoms filled with methane, ordinary household gas, With corner reflectors made of foil packs of cigarettes. smile
      1. 0
        25 November 2016 22: 48
        The computer will easily sort and forget such interference. But our aviation will have to suffer.

        But tethered barrage balloons are an interesting topic. Previously, they tried to fasten them to protection against cruise missiles, now you can try to protect yourself from UAVs.
  12. 0
    25 November 2016 22: 18
    Let's hope that our designers also do not stand still and, in addition to the economically appropriate modernization of the City and Smerch (Tornado-G, Tornado-S), are developing new MLRS ...
  13. 0
    26 November 2016 21: 49
    Remember teapots about volley fire. But you still itch. And we should not forget the trace.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"