Military Review

Japanese Foreign Ministry protests against deployment of Russian missile systems in the Kuril Islands

81
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan declared a protest in connection with the deployment of Russian missile systems in the South Kuril Islands. Recall that the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation decided to deploy on the two islands of the Kuril Ridge coastal missile systems "Ball" and "Bastion" - by division at each.


Japanese News Agency Kyodo reports that the foreign minister of the Land of the Rising Sun, Fumio Kushida, had to answer questions from parliamentarians about the reaction of the Foreign Ministry. Kushida replied:
24 November, we sent a protest through diplomatic channels. Strengthening Russia's military presence in the northern territories (as the Southern Kuriles call it in Tokyo) contradicts our position with regard to these islands. We regret it.


Japanese Foreign Ministry protests against deployment of Russian missile systems in the Kuril Islands


The main military department of Russia noticed that the Russian Federation places the necessary weapons on the Russian territory on which it considers necessary.

Recall that soon there will be a visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to Japan, during which the Japanese side once again intends to raise the issue of the territorial identity of the South Kuriles.

By the way, when does the Japanese Foreign Ministry protest the US over the deployment of weapons and a large contingent in Okinawa? ..
Photos used:
South China Morning Post
81 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 25 November 2016 12: 37
    +1
    There will be many more protests from the Japanese laughing what to talk about them.
    1. The black
      The black 25 November 2016 12: 38
      +9
      Well expressed and expressed. More protest - less protest, what's the difference. As Churchill said, "You will never go all the way if you stop to throw a stone at every yapping dog."
  2. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 25 November 2016 12: 37
    +6
    Russia places the necessary weapons on that Russian territory in which it considers necessary

    Comrades Japanese, there are still questions. No questions, everyone is free. As for the American bases in Okinawa, the Americans have long said to the Japanese: "FREE".
    1. Svetlana
      Svetlana 25 November 2016 12: 50
      +7
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Russia places the necessary weapons on that Russian territory in which it considers necessary

      Comrades Japanese, there are still questions. No questions, everyone is free. As for the American bases in Okinawa, the Americans have long said to the Japanese: "FREE".

      You, as always, are right, but only the Japanese are not our comrades and have never been. It would be more accurate to say partners. This - "and not a friend, and not an enemy, but so."
      1. wasjasibirjac
        wasjasibirjac 25 November 2016 14: 02
        +1
        Quote: Svetlana
        You are, as always, right, but only the Japanese are not comrades to us and have never been

        Well, do not call them "gentlemen".
      2. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 26 November 2016 02: 26
        +1
        Svetlana, I built a comment on phrases ending the meeting in the military unit - comrade officers ...
    2. Niccola Mack
      Niccola Mack 25 November 2016 13: 16
      +2
      As for the American bases in Okinawa, the Americans have long said to the Japanese: "FREE".

      More precisely in Roman - Vae victis - "woe to the vanquished."
      And our throats from the Duma forget how to remind the Japanese about this and the unconditional act of surrender too.
  3. Zomanus
    Zomanus 25 November 2016 12: 40
    0
    Actually, Putin was rather robust in defining our position on the account of the islands before the start of the next round of chatter, which the Japanese call discussion. Missiles installed, what's next? And the Japanese will have to figure out how to persuade us against this background to give them the islands.
  4. Gray brother
    Gray brother 25 November 2016 12: 40
    0
    C'mon, Kushida-san, don't regret the impossible. laughing
  5. I doubt it
    I doubt it 25 November 2016 12: 41
    +7
    Well, as they say:
    "Protest, don't protest, you'll still get hu ...."
  6. Monarchist
    Monarchist 25 November 2016 12: 42
    +2
    V.V. How dare you strengthen your territory? So you need to understand japs? If we declared that we would agree to cede 2 islands, the yaps will say, and also d avai.
  7. megafair
    megafair 25 November 2016 12: 42
    +5
    Japs remind me of children who, looking at a broken toy, cry, close their eyes with their hands, then open and look - suddenly everything seemed and the toy was whole, then again cry and so on in circles :)
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. Baloo
    Baloo 25 November 2016 12: 44
    +5
    Comrades Eponets, Russian missiles are aimed only at those objects that pose a threat to the Russian Federation. There are no American bases in Japan, and there are no targets. The comrades of the eponas and their mother-wives will be able to sleep peacefully and not worry about their children and about their bright future when the last Macington macaque leaves the territory of the epony. hi
    1. win
      win 25 November 2016 15: 55
      +1
      Russian missiles are aimed only at those objects that pose a threat to the Russian Federation. There are no American bases in Japan, no targets

      I think the question should be posed broader ...
      Introduced sanctions means enemy.
      Insults in the press - too enemy.
      And rockets should be aimed at the enemy.
      They’re just directed,
      but WARNING !!!

    2. KaPToC
      KaPToC 25 November 2016 19: 32
      0
      Quote: Balu
      There are no American bases in Japan, and there are no targets.

      Well, why cheat the Japanese? Well, the Americans will remove their bases, do you think Russia will be easier? The Japanese immediately put their own, only the nationality of the targets will change.
  9. Kosmotoga
    Kosmotoga 25 November 2016 12: 44
    +5
    A peace treaty has always been an ordinary piece of paper. Therefore, more missiles are large and small.
  10. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 25 November 2016 12: 46
    +4
    24 November, we sent a protest through diplomatic channels. Strengthening Russia's military presence in the northern territories (as the Southern Kuriles call it in Tokyo) contradicts our position with regard to these islands. We regret it.
    The key phrase here "... contradicts our position regarding these islands ...", but the fact is that this does not at all contradict OUR, RUSSIAN position so that you protest as much as you like, but it would be better to protest about the presence of a military base of a foreign state USA, on its territory, which will not just leave and which destroyed your people in a monstrous way, cowardly yakuza ...
  11. Brigadier
    Brigadier 25 November 2016 12: 56
    +3
    Japan expressed to Russia about the South Kuril Islands 2515th last Chinese warning ... laughing
  12. 3vs
    3vs 25 November 2016 12: 57
    +4
    "When will the Japanese Foreign Ministry express its protest to the United States about the deployment of weapons and a large contingent in Okinawa? .."
    This is the question our leadership should have asked the Japanese first, before discussing anything.
    around the islands!
  13. Wolka
    Wolka 25 November 2016 13: 02
    +2
    it remains for the samurai to only regret, because on our territory we are our own masters, and we place our weapons as we see fit
  14. The black
    The black 25 November 2016 13: 27
    +4
    Quote: ahpar2
    Armenia does not want Chinese "green men" to appear in Siberia in about 40-50 years

    Don’t drink, and the green men will stop imagining wink
  15. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 25 November 2016 13: 27
    +3
    Russia is degenerating its sincere regret at the inability to deploy missiles on Okinawa, and in the suburbs of Tokyo ...
  16. Caesar
    Caesar 25 November 2016 13: 29
    +3
    As I understand it, with the appearance on the territory of the South Kuril Islands of the Russian coastal missile systems "Ball" and "Bastion" the issue of the territorial affiliation of the South Kuril Islands is removed by itself.
  17. Elevator in the building
    Elevator in the building 25 November 2016 13: 34
    +2
    By the way, when does the Japanese Foreign Ministry protest the US over the deployment of weapons and a large contingent in Okinawa? ..
    - beautiful ))
  18. GEV67
    GEV67 25 November 2016 13: 48
    +2
    Samurai litter still outraged !? Strange ...
  19. Rom14
    Rom14 25 November 2016 13: 55
    +3
    Putin should not go to the Japanese ... There is no peace treaty, claims in the Kuril Islands are only escalating, and the kamikaze are not extinct ....
  20. Caesar
    Caesar 25 November 2016 14: 07
    0
    I think that Putin still needs to go. Let the Japs know in the face of those whom they need to be afraid of and avoid.
  21. Kondratko
    Kondratko 25 November 2016 14: 19
    +1
    The strengthening of Russia's military presence in the northern territories (as the South Kuril Islands is called in Tokyo) contradicts our position with regard to these islands.

    "Ball" and "Bastion" are a clear answer, or rather a point on your never-ending tediousness about the islands. We still lacked on the islands that you "wanted" NATO missiles and "wanting" does not mean getting - keep wanting further. The results of WW2 were summed up, at one time they were in agreement with everything that was happening, the papers were signed - we walk in the forest, in the forest, if it is not there, then by the sea, by the sea.
  22. mojohed2012
    mojohed2012 25 November 2016 14: 23
    +2
    Let them protest. But we simply must constantly firmly state that the Japanese have nothing to even rely on the return of any territories, because After the 2 of World War II, the Russian Federation, as the successor to the USSR, became the owner of all disputed territories. And the imperialist and fascist-inhuman policies of Imperial Japan led to this.
    Otherwise, give us at least 1 island to Yapam and then Merkelsha will claim the rights to Kaliningrad.
  23. Fitter65
    Fitter65 25 November 2016 14: 40
    +1
    That's because of geographical inconsistency. They talk about some NORTHERN territories, but we are located in the SOUTHERN Kuril Islands, But the South Kuril Islands is Russian territory and we can do whatever we want on them without asking anyone. By the way, somewhere in the underdog country also was the General, who was talking about the south-north (or north-south?), it’s not so much from the same licked area ... laughing laughing
  24. Papapg
    Papapg 25 November 2016 14: 49
    +2
    And from which side are these Japanese? According to popular wisdom, they don’t wave their fists after a fight. Maybe it was necessary to take the island of Hokkaido, and then give as goodwill, although not, do not give. As in the joke about Vasily Ivanovich - I don’t understand these Japanese, why they jump with their bare heels on their bare sword (((
  25. Papapg
    Papapg 25 November 2016 14: 51
    0
    Still, after the collapse of the USSR, it became fashionable to blame everything on the USSR, well, we too, but we got this territory from the USSR, ask the Communists
  26. Roman96
    Roman96 25 November 2016 15: 10
    +2
    my grandfather paid for them with his blood, not the islands, not for the purpose of giving them away.
  27. Volodin Dmitry
    Volodin Dmitry 25 November 2016 16: 24
    0
    AhParrrr climbed in and rushed ... The rabbit is not peaceful. (I began to read only komenty and then THIS !!! Ugh on him. hi
  28. win
    win 25 November 2016 16: 37
    +1
    the issue of the territorial affiliation of the South Kuril Islands

    will return Ararat to the Kurds


    On the borders of Russia clearly said President Putin V.V. : ... we will restore our world. Our country does not end at our borders today. We all remember, and we will return what was taken from us. And we will return not only what was taken from us in 1991, but also what was taken away earlier. Our borders do not end anywhere.
    By the way, they didn’t pay with us for Alaska ...
    "... it is necessary to create today new union of peoples and countries around Russia and the Russian people... It is necessary to remember that we are all one people and one country, and we do not and cannot have real borders with each other. "
    So, Japanese, unite with Russia and you will not have any problems with the territories ...
  29. Demeter
    Demeter 25 November 2016 19: 37
    0
    It’s time for Russia to protest Japan over the Japanese occupation of Hokkaido, which, according to the decision of the Yalta Conference, was to be handed over to the USSR
    1. win
      win 25 November 2016 20: 05
      +3
      Before the trip of the President of Russia V. Putin to Japan, it is reasonable to make claims based on well-known historical facts. Shake with ancient scrolls and manuscripts, which is normal and practice in such matters.
      The insistence on giving Hokkaido would be a cold shower for Tokyo. I would have to argue in the negotiations not about the Kuril Islands, but about my own territory at the moment. I would have to defend myself, to justify myself, to prove my right. Russia would have gone over from diplomatic defense to an offensive in this way.
      If official state structures cannot start such a campaign for diplomatic reasons, one of the informal patriotic organizations can do this. The state will support the initiative.
      This is how Americans sometimes act, calling it a public-private partnership. Why is Russia worse? Permanently addressing the issue of Kuril Islands affiliation by “pre-trolling” Tokyo with media and diplomatic attacks beforehand is a worthy task for such a practice. The slogan of the campaign could be the words: “Hokkaido is a Russian island!”
      1. Wasiliy1985
        Wasiliy1985 25 November 2016 20: 35
        0
        In terms of: to discourage yapps from the desire about the Kuriles "in the root" is a sensible idea. But really demanding Hokkaido is, of course, from the realm of fantasy. Although they are so loved in Japan .. :)
        1. win
          win 25 November 2016 20: 54
          +1
          But really demanding Hokkaido - certainly from a fantasy field

          On the borders of Russia clearly said President Putin V.V. : ... we will restore our world. Our country does not end at our borders today. We all remember, and we will return what was taken from us. And we will return not only what was taken from us in 1991, but also what was taken away earlier. Our borders do not end anywhere.
          By the way, they didn’t pay with us for Alaska ...
          And this is a hint touchstone at the state level. Prior to this, only the lazy did not write and speak.
          And the task of posterity to make a fairy tale (fantasy) come true.
  30. Wasiliy1985
    Wasiliy1985 25 November 2016 20: 30
    0
    That's right, the RF Ministry of Defense answered: "The RF is placing the necessary weapons on THAT RUSSIAN TERRITORY, where it considers it necessary."
    In general, that’s all ..
  31. razved
    razved 25 November 2016 21: 54
    0
    Strange guys - they themselves are occupied by the USA (and are silent), we place weapons on our territory, and they are indignant.
  32. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 25 November 2016 22: 22
    0
    The cross-eyed didn’t understand anything ... As long as they are an OCCUPIED territory, NO ONE NEVER will talk seriously with them about anything. And from their notes, no one is neither cold nor hot. Well, how can one be so stupid so as not to understand such simple things.
  33. megavolt65
    megavolt65 26 November 2016 03: 02
    0
    That's interesting, did anyone ask the opinion of the residents of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands? I can sow as a native Sakhalin resident - if they didn’t go through the forest ... Visa-free (mutually) - you can, but give the islands .... Can you lower your pants and bend down? Quite already got it. THIS IS OUR LAND! Samurai dreamers, damn it.
  34. Swetly
    Swetly 26 November 2016 08: 18
    0
    The dog barks, the caravan goes on.
  35. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 26 November 2016 15: 06
    0
    Well ... kill yourself against the wall or something. You are doing something illogical, samurai. You are strengthening your fleet, new helicopter carriers have been built, the size of "Kuzyu", the ban on the use of your troops outside the borders of your country has been lifted ... Does this mean nothing? And we just took aim at half of Hokkaido, so that even the thought of "lightning amphibious operation" would not come wassat
    Russia has become a master of "asymmetric responses."
  36. romandostalo
    romandostalo 26 November 2016 20: 08
    0
    Or are we afraid of North Korean aggression? Here we place it! We have long dreamed of giving the Kuril Islands to the Japanese, and so what will we give them if they are captured?
  37. Jubilee
    Jubilee 30 November 2016 17: 31
    0
    We wanted to choke on their protests.