Military Review

Tank Type 10 officially adopted by the Japanese self-defense forces

63

Japanese media reported that on January 10 X. JGSDF (Japanese Self-Defense Forces) 2012 adopted a Type 10 tank, the main battle tank of the fourth generation.


Official acceptance ceremony tank Adopted at the Fuji School.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Group - the Japanese industrial group - has become the main developer of Type 10. This group last 50 years engaged in the release and maintenance of tanks for the Japanese self-defense forces.

Tank fourth generation began to develop in the 1990-ies. In Japan, the Type 10 was first demonstrated in the city of Sagamihara 13 in February 2008 on the territory of the Research Center of the Ministry of Defense of Japan (TRDI). During the development work, this tank was known by the indices MVT-X and TK-X.

The main parameters of the Type 10: length (with a gun forward) - 9420 mm; height - 2300 mm; width - 3240 mm; weight - 44 t., crew - 3 person. The main weapon is a Japanese-made 120 millimeter smoothbore gun with a 44 caliber barrel. There are options for guns with a long barrel - L55 and L50. Caliber anti-aircraft machine gun - 12,7 mm, paired - 7,62 mm. Automatic loading is located at the stern of the tower. The maximum vehicle speed when driving on paved roads is 70 kilometers per hour. Hydropneumatic suspension allows you to change the clearance of the machine, tilt it on the side.


Compared to Type 90, a Japanese tank of the previous generation, the new tank has less weight and dimensions, it is shorter by one roller, but it has better performance and is equipped with a large number of modern electronic systems. The main emphasis in the development of the tank was made on C4I systems and on increasing mobility, protection and firepower. To ensure a greater level of protection, additional mounted modules can be used, the weight of the machine increases to 48 tons. Panoramic sight commander moved to the right side, to a higher position. Thus, the commander was provided with a better overview.


Prior to 2008, development costs amounted to about 48,4 billion yen (approximately 447 million dollars). With mass production, the cost of each machine will be about 700 million yen (6,5 million dollars). In December 2009, the Japanese Ministry of Defense officially completed the tests of the tank Type 10. In 2010, the ministry placed an order worth 12,4 billion yen for an installation batch of 30 Type 10 tanks (¥ 954 million per unit).

On January 10, the commander of an armored division declared that the Type 10 tank was currently the most advanced battle tank in the world.


63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 23 January 2012 16: 01
    +1
    I like this name - "self-defense forces", the army is banned, and "people's squad" on tanks and planes is as much as you like am
    1. soldat1945
      soldat1945 23 January 2012 22: 40
      -1
      I’m probably confusing something, but in Japan since 2006 the Ministry of Defense and the army, not some self-defense forces, the author apparently didn’t find the exact translation or doesn’t own the situation!
      1. makano
        makano 24 January 2012 08: 08
        0
        The Japanese constitution on renouncing its own armed forces has not yet been revised, but the basis for creating an atomic bomb has long existed. And do not lead people through their dense darkness "soldiers" of someone's army.
        The ninth article of the Japanese Constitution is a legal norm enshrined in the Japanese Constitution of 1947, which proclaims the state renounces war as a way to resolve international disputes, and, as a result, creates its own ground forces, navy and air force. No amendments, both to the Ninth Article and to the entire Constitution of Japan as a whole, were introduced after May 3, 1947.

        “Article 9. Sincerely striving for international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever reject war as the sovereign right of the nation, as well as the threat or use of armed force as a means of resolving international disputes.
        To achieve the goal indicated in the previous paragraph, land, sea and air forces, as well as other means of war, will never be created in the future. The right to a state of war is not recognized. "

        Despite the fact that the article provides for the state to renounce the right to wage war and have armed forces, Japan has a de facto army - the Self-Defense Forces of Japan. From a formal point of view, the Japanese army is considered a special type of police force, its activities are formally limited only to the country's defense, although in fact the Japanese fleet takes part in the fight against pirates in the Gulf of Aden, protecting foreign ships.
        In July 2004, the Article 9 Association (Japanese Kyu: jo: no kai?) Was formed by prominent Japanese cultural figures, advocating for preventing the revision of Article XNUMX and the return to militarism of pre-war Japan.
        However, in May 2007, the Upper House of the Japanese Parliament approved a referendum bill prepared by the government that opens the door to revising the constitution and repealing some of its pacifist provisions.
        1. soldat1945
          soldat1945 20 March 2012 12: 16
          0
          The Ministry of Defense of Japan (Jap. Bo: Hey-sho :?) is one of the ministries of the Japanese government. This state body became a ministry on January 9, 2007 after the entry into force of the law adopted on December 15, 2006. Until that moment, the Ministry was the Office of National Defense (UNO) (я. Bo: hey-cho :?). The headquarters of the Ministry is located in Tokyo, in the Shinjuku area. The Ministry of Defense has the largest staff in the Japanese government.
          I am a soldier of the Russian army, in dense darkness, with all due respect, I am not. And your opus is certainly interesting, but still there is the Ministry of Defense.
  2. UI-Spb
    UI-Spb 23 January 2012 16: 03
    +5
    The fact that the mass and size have been reduced, well done. As for the rest, like everyone else, they will assemble a tank and shout in an ultimatum, "He is the best and most advanced."
    1. Skiff
      Skiff 23 January 2012 17: 50
      0
      That suggests why the "self-defense forces" need a tank with a reduced weight and dimensions, while there was an increase in mobility, protection and firepower. It suggests that this is an aggressive tank, it is easier to transfer it to the theater of operations, the question is where? .....
      1. esaul
        esaul 23 January 2012 18: 17
        -2
        Quote: Skiff
        That suggests, why would the "self-defense forces" need a tank with a reduced weight and dimensions, while there was an increase in mobility, protection and firepower.
        You are a naive person, I will tell you ... How do you order to swim to the islands of the Kuril ridge? On boats and rafts - scary, you can get "Granite"! And so - I drove along the bottom, set the pipe up - you look, you will look at the Northern Territories for about 20 seconds ... More, unfortunately, will not work.







        1. KGB161rus
          KGB161rus 23 January 2012 19: 07
          +2
          something they have in common German Leo a5 and Franz Leclerc







          in my opinion, the tank in Japan was very successful, the weight is up to 50 tons (even with additional armor modules) for comparison, the T90 is about 46 - 48 tons, there is an automatic loader (crew of 3 people), I think the tank’s cross-country issue is also closed, since let's say that Leo recommended the seed very, very well (yes, in addition there is a hydropneumatic suspension), the only question is open whether the Japanese have guided weapons. . .
          1. Banderlos
            Banderlos 23 January 2012 20: 58
            0
            KGB161rus,
            Nothing to do with Leo and Leclerc. Although the gun from the Germans
    2. esaul
      esaul 23 January 2012 18: 12
      +1
      Quote: UI-Spb
      The fact that the mass and size have been reduced, well done. As for the rest, like everyone else, they will assemble a tank and shout in an ultimatum, "He is the best and most advanced."








      Koreans, the same, look, how they crucified that their "Black Panther" is unique, and now material about flaws has gone ...
    3. Vadivak
      Vadivak 23 January 2012 20: 15
      +3
      Quote: UI-Spb
      "He is the best and the most advanced"


      Each sandpiper praises its swamp and it is commendable, it’s better than yelling like Postnikov that “the T-90 is actually the 17th modification of the Soviet T-72,” well, even if it is, what kind of commander after that? Who wants to work, and who does not want to look for the guilty
  3. smile
    smile 23 January 2012 16: 06
    -2
    yeah, and their helicopter carriers, apparently staffed by militias, they bashfully call destroyers.
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 23 January 2012 20: 32
      +2
      Quote: smile
      their helicopter carriers, apparently equipped with militias, they bashfully call destroyers.


      There, a new class was born - the destroyer-helicopter carrier, although the whole west calls them light aircraft carriers
  4. dred
    dred 23 January 2012 16: 08
    -1
    Tank 4 generations? Something I can’t believe. A sensible sheepskin is not worth it. A sad raptor is doubtful.
  5. подводник
    подводник 23 January 2012 16: 25
    -1
    I have some questions:

    1. Why do Japan need tanks?
    2. Why does Japan need helicopter carriers?
    3. Why should a state that has survived such a catastrophe spend money on developing new weapons? (They have HUGE debts)
    4. Why did Kudrin not leave for Japan?
    1. datur
      datur 23 January 2012 16: 40
      +1
      подводник.. Why did Kudrin not leave for Japan? --- THIS EXACTLY !!! why didn’t he take all our trash with him !!!! fellow and for the rest of the items, their militia must be armed, that’s all wink all the more so in terms of green paper stocks they are kind of 1e, so they don’t mind this junk! wink
    2. Igor
      Igor 23 January 2012 16: 40
      +2
      Quote: submariner
      1. Why do Japan need tanks?

      Stupid question.
      Quote: submariner
      2. Why does Japan need helicopter carriers?

      Absolutely stupid question.
      Quote: submariner
      .Why should a power that has survived such a catastrophe spend money on developing new weapons?

      Very silly question.
      Quote: submariner
      4. Why did Kudrin not leave for Japan?

      Well, a very stupid question.
      1. подводник
        подводник 23 January 2012 16: 55
        +1
        Well, where am I to the foolish, how can I compare myself with the noble and inimitable IGORK! Bearing a light of reason and clarity of thought in the gray jungle of the Internet !!! smile
        1. Igor
          Igor 23 January 2012 17: 00
          0
          Don’t be offended, I’m joking, but in general to ask smart questions you need to know more than half of the answer, so I ask in most cases stupid questions.
      2. Banderlos
        Banderlos 23 January 2012 16: 57
        -6
        Quote: Igorek
        Well, a very stupid question.

        I support, there are a lot of pagon here.
        1. подводник
          подводник 23 January 2012 17: 01
          +3
          wink wink wink You would at least learn the language of Bender, but you won’t write porn! wink wink wink
          1. Banderlos
            Banderlos 23 January 2012 20: 59
            -2
            Quote: submariner
            even learned the Russian language

            What for?
        2. Igor
          Igor 23 January 2012 17: 02
          -3
          So you are in the first place among all lol
          1. подводник
            подводник 23 January 2012 18: 36
            0
            And again in my garden!
            Okay! fellow
            1. Igor
              Igor 23 January 2012 18: 58
              -1
              This is not for me, but for Banderlos, let's go better, we’ll troll him on a branch about ekranoplanes.
              1. подводник
                подводник 23 January 2012 19: 12
                +1
                I won’t go drink beer!
                1. Igor
                  Igor 23 January 2012 19: 21
                  0
                  Okay, I’ll handle it myself, and you have a good drink smile
                  1. подводник
                    подводник 23 January 2012 19: 27
                    -4
                    Thank. Successfully troll!
                    1. Banderlos
                      Banderlos 23 January 2012 21: 00
                      -4
                      Quote: submariner

                      Thank. Successfully troll!

                      This is your level of Russians.
                      1. Igor
                        Igor 24 January 2012 06: 54
                        -1
                        Quote: Banderlos
                        This is your level of Russians.

                        So you first started.
            2. Banderlos
              Banderlos 23 January 2012 20: 59
              +2
              подводник,
              Who cares, I don’t like stupid ones either.
      3. dmitry98
        dmitry98 23 January 2012 21: 58
        +1
        concise and true, 5+
    3. urzul
      urzul 23 January 2012 16: 48
      0
      Kuril Islands and the Far East
      1. Banderlos
        Banderlos 23 January 2012 17: 00
        0
        Quote: urzul

        Kuril Islands and the Far East

        Sakhalin
        1. подводник
          подводник 23 January 2012 18: 37
          0
          Well, here you are right!
    4. Evgen2509
      Evgen2509 24 January 2012 00: 41
      +2
      1. Why do Japan need tanks?
      2. Why does Japan need helicopter carriers?
      3. Why should a state that has survived such a catastrophe spend money on developing new weapons? (They have HUGE debts)


      And to finally gain independence. The real one is from the States. And then one of the largest countries in the world (both in terms of economy and the population is not sick) - still almost does not determine its policy.
  6. vasek-3180
    vasek-3180 23 January 2012 16: 26
    0
    each sandpiper praises its swamp smile
  7. Banderlos
    Banderlos 23 January 2012 16: 36
    -1
    These are old photos, but if the commander's hatch cover and the "remotely" controlled machine gun remain, then it's not beautiful.
  8. sanyarusian
    sanyarusian 23 January 2012 16: 37
    +1
    I think our T90s tank is exactly better
    1. predator
      predator 23 January 2012 18: 10
      +3
      I think so too, T90S is a good car
      1. Banderlos
        Banderlos 23 January 2012 18: 18
        0
        Quote: predator

        I think so too, T90S is a good car

        Japanese best:
        - a gun
        - shells
        - engine
        - transmission
        - suspension
        - thrust-to-weight ratio
        - easier
        - more mobile
        - MSA
        - eye
        TYPE accepted and will be produced, T-90 is not produced
        1. подводник
          подводник 23 January 2012 18: 33
          0
          smile Benderovets, again deuce! (There are 2 mistakes in one word! You must have lit an ABC book! smile )
          1. Banderlos
            Banderlos 23 January 2012 21: 01
            +4
            подводник,
            Yes, there is no such tank as the T-90 already.
    2. Banderlos
      Banderlos 23 January 2012 18: 15
      +3
      Quote: Sanyarusian

      I think our T90s tank is exactly better

      What?
      1. подводник
        подводник 23 January 2012 18: 47
        +1
        Here someone says how aesthetically pleasing this tank looks, what remarkable tactical and technical characteristics of another!
        To be honest (and I'm not strong in tanks), I do not agree with them.
        Because all true peasants know one truth - it is not technology that wins, people win.
        So Benderyovets our tanks were, are and will be the BEST (pay attention to spelling) because they are not fought by Germans, not Bandera, but by the invincible guys of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION wink
        (HELLO TO UNBEAT BANDERS-IN SIBERIA ANOTHER MUCH FOREST)
        1. Banderlos
          Banderlos 23 January 2012 21: 02
          -4
          Quote: submariner
          HELLO TO UNBEAT BANDERS-IN SIBERIA ANOTHER MUCH FOREST

          smile How many stupid talents does a stupid country have ... And also, roads
          1. подводник
            подводник 23 January 2012 23: 06
            +1
            Why are you rubbing yourself here?
            Found yourself equal?
            Oh, you Bendera! wink
            1. Banderlos
              Banderlos 23 January 2012 23: 08
              -3
              Quote: submariner

              Why are you rubbing yourself here?
              Found yourself equal?

              You need to be taught, who else will teach you?
        2. gor
          gor 24 January 2012 09: 18
          0
          yes lan successful himself didn’t go to the army as far as I know. here if you were put into a tank how much would you differ from a monkey with a grenade?))))))))))))))))) )))
          and Vova listened yesterday so he’s right and judging by his words the troll is here. and your goal is to rock the situation in the country
          1. gor
            gor 24 January 2012 11: 06
            0
            submariner about a monkey with a grenade, I asked you about everything else
            1. подводник
              подводник 24 January 2012 15: 19
              0
              I have never been in a tank, let alone monkeys.
              He served in the navy.
              Any questions?
              1. gor
                gor 24 January 2012 16: 22
                0
                as far as I know you are 19 years old. The point is not that much. When you were in a tank, would you do something? And given that the tankers of the NATO countries were more traditionally better prepared than the Soviet tankers. Draw conclusions))))))))
                1. подводник
                  подводник 25 January 2012 08: 01
                  0
                  Well now, what can I tell you?
                  RZHUNIMAGU !!!
      2. sanyarusian
        sanyarusian 23 January 2012 19: 42
        -3
        Yes, somehow he doesn’t want to look for something, he answers you, in general, you don’t want to spend time in vain on you, if you need to look and you will find out!
  9. SIA
    SIA 23 January 2012 16: 53
    -2
    Japan and so shakes periodically. And if she thoroughly shakes, then she will have neither self-defense, nor helicopter carriers. And the tanks that remain intact, we will get. wink

    He would really understand his Fukushima. And they rivet tanks, although it may not interfere with one another.
  10. Konsmo
    Konsmo 23 January 2012 16: 55
    +1
    Glamorous. Interestingly, there is a mirror for the ladies.
    And what are the smart size -9.5 meters long. Shoot at the side without opening your eyes. bully
    1. gor
      gor 24 January 2012 09: 21
      +2
      where do you get such successful from? the length of this is always considered with the cannon with the cannon. look at the t-90 the length of the granotomyotchik. I am amazed at you. this is ....... c)))))))))))) ))))))))))))))))))))))
  11. Sarus
    Sarus 23 January 2012 16: 58
    -2
    Belarus sheathed with iron .. A tank is a weapon of attack and breakthrough but not self-defense
  12. Zlyden.Zlo
    Zlyden.Zlo 23 January 2012 17: 22
    +2
    I imagine how much electronics they stuffed there))))))
  13. DEfindER
    DEfindER 23 January 2012 17: 36
    +1
    Eh, all the same, it wouldn’t hurt us to get hold of this Mitsubishi, for experiments, there are probably a lot of things that would be useful for our developers, I do not mean so much combat qualities as crew comfort, smooth running, economy and engine power, compact equipment, and the most important thing is that they achieved such a small mass, with such power, the Mitsubishi tanks, as far as I know, have a power plant of at least 1500 horses .. against our 1000 on the T-90 .. in general, I seem to have a job for our intelligence .. And Mitsubishi still makes his soul, n appearance at all handsome, maybe it's unpatriotic and yet the Japanese fellows, hardworking folk ..
    1. Banderlos
      Banderlos 23 January 2012 17: 48
      +3
      Quote: DEfindER
      power plant of at least 1500 horses .. against our 1000 on the T-90 ..

      It seems like less, but the chip is still in the transmission and without a guitar.
  14. KILLAvolt
    KILLAvolt 23 January 2012 17: 38
    +5
    It’s immediately obvious that the tank is Japanese ... it looks somehow in Japanese, like all their equipment! Nothing! fellow
  15. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 23 January 2012 17: 55
    0
    It looks solid in appearance, there is no doubt about the advanced electronic filling, however, the small mass (booking is obviously rather weak) and the five rink chassis are embarrassing.
  16. Andrey_K
    Andrey_K 23 January 2012 17: 56
    +4
    And what do they have no dynamic protection?
    And what is the thickness of the armor?
    And the armor of composites?
    1. Banderlos
      Banderlos 23 January 2012 18: 02
      +3
      Quote: Andrey_K
      And what do they have no dynamic protection?

      No.
      Quote: Andrey_K
      And what is the thickness of the armor?

      What did they want
      Quote: Andrey_K
      And the armor of composites?

      This is called "combined". And also modular.
  17. sealord
    sealord 23 January 2012 18: 13
    -2
    So this is a barrage machine - to clean up Fukushima. A tower with a gun - by inertia, the FVU is already built in, adapted, etc.
  18. Banderlos
    Banderlos 23 January 2012 18: 15
    +7
    Pendant what lala:

    1. Banderlos
      Banderlos 23 January 2012 23: 40
      +2
      Banderlos,
      Such a suspension should, in theory, be on any new one - hydropneumatics, an exceptional feature of East Asian tanks.
  19. Andrey_K
    Andrey_K 23 January 2012 18: 45
    +4
    All the same, the tanks are doing the wrong things now.
    A modern tank should:
    1) To be able to dig in quickly.
    Those. not one small bucket to have, but a whole mill on the nose, an excavator or two huge buckets in front and behind.
    So that he just arrived and after 30 seconds the trench in full growth is ready, only the tower sticks out.
    2) The tower should be without a crew at the rear of the tank.
    By the way, if the tower is from behind, then by the way it is pushed out of the trench it is impossible to determine where the tank body is, and if the tower is bombed, the crew on the surviving chassis rolls off the battlefield to the rear, where a new tower is quickly attached to it.
    3) The tank needs a camouflage umbrella.
    So that after he arrived at the position (under the cover of a smoke screen), and dug in - he opened an umbrella (20 meters radius), which completely hides all the traces of the excavation and the tank underneath.
    And the area will take the form as it was before.
  20. Freedom eagle
    Freedom eagle 23 January 2012 19: 16
    0
    Quote: UI-Spb
    And the rest, like everyone else, will assemble a tank and well yell in the ultimatum form "He is the best and most advanced."

    Well, you really made me laugh. Almost like in Rashkin propaganda like "carbon monoxide" incantation phrases: "Russian weapons are the best in the world!" ... "has no analogues in the world!" ... "we have overtaken the West in similar developments by 20-30-40 years!" well and so on. am
    Quote: Skiff
    That suggests, why would the "self-defense forces" need a tank with a reduced weight and dimensions, while there was an increase in mobility, protection and firepower. It suggests that this is an aggressive tank, it is easier to transfer to the theater of operations, the question is where? ...

    And fuck Rossi tanks! And this despite the fact that there are more tanks in the "erefia" than in the whole of NATO together with the USA, Israel, Japan and Australia combined. But the tank is a weapon of AGGRESSION! Is Russia going to attack NATO? No, it doesn't look like it. NATO is not afraid of Russia if it can easily cut its military budgets and armed forces. And if NATO disarms, then nothing threatens Russia from the western borders !? A logical conclusion suggests itself that the loud squeals of the pro-Kremlin shellon about the NATO threat are LYING! CHOICE, ANNOUNCED FALSE !!!

    Quote: Sanyarusian
    I think our T90s tank is exactly better


    Quote: predator
    I think so too, T90S is a good car


    The T-90 is just an upgraded and renamed T-72, and this tank (T-72) is yesterday.
    Quote: DEfindER
    Eh, all the same, it would not hurt us to get hold of this Mitsubishi, for experiments,

    Roll up your lip fellow
    1. KGB161rus
      KGB161rus 23 January 2012 19: 23
      -3
      Freedom eagle

      I decided to read so for myself that you have fought, lol , you are such a Fat Troll, what else you need to look for!
    2. подводник
      подводник 23 January 2012 19: 35
      +2
      Bird you are noted here!
      About the fact that we have tanks and many, yes, that's good!
      Not iron wins - people win!
      And you also had to add to your comment on the anger of the day:
      VYSURKOVA PROPAGANDA VYSURKOVA PROPAGANDA
      Or do you in Pindos this is not shown?
      And this is a bird to you as a gift!
      1. gor
        gor 24 January 2012 12: 06
        +1
        one amendment, but on what will you bring this army to the White House? or on improvised means across the Atlantic?)))))))))))))))))))))) so to speak, the dreams of someone who does not really follow behind that which speaks and that which is in reality.
        and where do these daredevils come from? I will assume that even at improvised means)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) ))))
        1. подводник
          подводник 24 January 2012 15: 16
          -3
          Who are you for I to report to you about the available ways to deliver any human resources and material resources to anywhere in the world?
          They are .
          Are you going to set up border guards along the coast?
          Yes, and you have border guards ............ only Mexicans scare.
          1. gor
            gor 24 January 2012 16: 24
            +1
            Yes, definitely you only have to deal with politics in the bathroom)))))))))))))))))))
            1. подводник
              подводник 25 January 2012 07: 54
              -3
              Probably judging by yourself?
              1. gor
                gor 25 January 2012 14: 00
                0
                don’t write brd simply. turn on the brain a little if you have it. when you say nothing the phrase rzhu does not tell the magician about your limitations
                1. подводник
                  подводник 25 January 2012 15: 10
                  -3
                  Pot calls the kettle black..............
                  As they say in Russia ...
                  Having studied your comments, I came to the conclusion that you are: modest, inconspicuous, with a mania for "Significance" (ACCORDING TO MY DATA ..........)
                  Shit you are gray
                  And about my age, I ALREADY HAVE EGGS, son ..........
                  1. gor
                    gor 26 January 2012 09: 30
                    +1
                    there would be a mania of significance so I wouldn’t be so modest and gray)))))))))))))))))))))))))) again wrote something that contradicts another written by you)) )))))))))))))))))
  21. Slayer
    Slayer 23 January 2012 19: 16
    -9
    Crap, the crew is in full view, a gourmet for a sniper))
  22. SIA
    SIA 23 January 2012 19: 55
    -7
    Buy one such tank, disassemble to the last nut, and copy, only in our version.
    1. Ivan Tarasov
      Ivan Tarasov 23 January 2012 21: 44
      -4
      Why do not we copy unpromising foreign samples.
      It should develop its tank building program.
      Our tank should become the best, armed with a 152 mm smoothbore gun, weighing about 65 tons, having a speed of 70 km / h, with overall dimensions in height of no more than the T-90.
      It is very important that you have a powerful gun.
      Such a machine would be able to destroy Abrams with a long range BPS shot.
      1. Banderlos
        Banderlos 23 January 2012 21: 53
        +4
        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
        152 mm smoothbore gun

        It may be, but what will be the ammunition then?
        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
        weighing about 65

        This is bad - it won’t pass through the Russian mud, you won’t throw it over with anything.
        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
        having a speed of 70 km / h

        It’s not difficult - calculate what the engine should be, but it doesn’t.
        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
        with overall dimensions in height of no more than the T-90.

        And this is generally. What will be the internal reserved space then?
        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
        Such a machine would be capable of destroying Abrams with a BPS shot.

        This is yes and not only.
        Quote: Ivan Tarasov
        long distance

        And this is not only determined by an instrument - and this is an abyss of work. The road is expensive and for a long, long time
        1. Ivan Tarasov
          Ivan Tarasov 25 January 2012 18: 19
          0
          Ammunition 40 rounds.
          Ground pressure 0.8kg, cm (increased reference area)
          The tower is uninhabited.
          Crew 2 people (mechanic - driver, commander - operator).
          Diesel 1800 hp (1500 prototypes are already available.)
          Abyss of work?
          Of course, work, and success will be achieved.
    2. Banderlos
      Banderlos 23 January 2012 21: 57
      +6
      Quote: SVV
      Buy one such tank

      Holy naivete, but who will sell it?
      Quote: SVV
      disassemble to the last nut, and copy, only in our version

      It is also important that there is where and how to produce, and this is the problem now.
  23. Sarus
    Sarus 23 January 2012 20: 45
    -3
    Copy tanks ... hmm ..
    I'm sure that in Tagil they will tell you that this is nothing ...
    Although to buy a mona ... Purely as a target for Armata or T-90
    1. gor
      gor 24 January 2012 10: 45
      +1
      another tag in sand form will be cast in tagil and they will say that there are no analogues))))))))))))) and that there is more cool chobham armor on this disc. yes, in order for domestic electronics to shove how much abrams it needs to be clean remove the metal disc, reduce the reserved space and increase the size by 2 times compared with the abrams)))))))))))))))))))
  24. vasek-3180
    vasek-3180 23 January 2012 20: 50
    -6
    on this glamorous tank only for a parade or a night club wink
  25. vasek-3180
    vasek-3180 23 January 2012 23: 31
    -2
    what n * adal minus?
  26. Old prdun
    Old prdun 24 January 2012 03: 57
    -2
    A tank for lowriding.)))) And ours know how?
  27. grizzlir
    grizzlir 24 January 2012 08: 11
    +1
    This Panasonic is an interesting machine, however, in order to declare whose tank is better or worse, you need to at least conduct their comparative tests at the training ground. Compare the dynamic characteristics, cross-country ability, finally fire from the gun of the opponent. And without this, only assumptions.
  28. Director
    Director 18 September 2012 10: 23
    0
    no, it is impossible not to evaluate it, its mobility and dimensions are too impressive.