Military Review

Media: Hackers obtained 134 data from thousands of US Navy personnel

20
Western resource Navy times reports on "continuing cyber campaign against the United States." The submission says that this time hackers attacked the servers of the country's chief naval department and received personal data of 134 thousands of current and former US Navy personnel.


Media: Hackers obtained 134 data from thousands of US Navy personnel


At the headquarters of the naval forces of the United States reported that the theft of personal data of seafarers became known in October, when relevant information was provided to the agency by Hewlett Packard. Employees of the company serving the US Navy, said that the servers were subjected to cyber attacks, from which the company could not defend itself.

It is noteworthy that this is not the first incident of its kind with data served by Hewlett Packard. So, just three years ago to American databases fleet, which at that time served HP, received Iran. At least, it was Iran itself that the representatives of Hewlett Packard indicated.

The US Navy states that at this stage an incident is being investigated with an attempt to identify the perpetrators of the attack. In connection with the latest events, it is quite possible to assume that the States will again “discover” either the “Iranian” or the “Russian trace”. It does not yet say whether the cooperation of the US Navy with Hewlett Packard, which, in fact, cannot ensure the safety of fleet data, will continue.
Photos used:
Military.com
20 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 24 November 2016 06: 11
    +4
    Hackers received data from 134 thousand US Navy personnel US sailors refused to go to sea. What if they recognize them.
    1. Sterlya
      Sterlya 24 November 2016 07: 13
      +1
      All Belarusians hacked.
      1. Alex_Rarog
        Alex_Rarog 24 November 2016 07: 16
        +3
        Mongols) at the personal request of Putin)
        1. Sterlya
          Sterlya 24 November 2016 07: 22
          +2
          One of two. Or Belarusians, or Mongols. Nobody needs them anymore.
          1. cniza
            cniza 24 November 2016 08: 20
            +4
            Someone from the command laptop lost, and now wants to blame on hackers. laughing
            1. Giant thought
              Giant thought 24 November 2016 08: 50
              +2
              And about the Chinese trace or something the Americans forgot to mention.
    2. Titsen
      Titsen 24 November 2016 09: 25
      +1
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Hackers received data from 134 thousand US Navy personnel

      And they were transferred to the Russian Ministry of Defense for study ...
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 24 November 2016 06: 14
    +3
    Hollywood and more! As soon as the mericatos do not crucify in their exclusiveness! And here is you, another hacking base! Only they can fight with tribes! bully
    1. The black
      The black 24 November 2016 06: 18
      +3
      Another argument in favor of the fact that our IO needs to think 1000 times before translating the personal files of military personnel into electronic format. You can’t do this!
    2. Titsen
      Titsen 24 November 2016 10: 14
      0
      Quote: aszzz888
      And here is you, another hacking base!


      Ours also made a similar base - now we have to wait for a "leak" from us!
  3. 210ox
    210ox 24 November 2016 06: 21
    +3
    Yes, you put your data in one place, who needs it .. Only a dating site .. Serious organizations act by other methods. The rams themselves laid out everything about themselves ..
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 24 November 2016 06: 43
    +2
    I don’t give a damn about who will be appointed guilty of penetration - we are no longer accustomed to hearing unfounded accusations. But the company that carries out computer security of the Navy is worth changing. Also, probably on tenders and pullbacks win tenders. And for our example, according to which one should put things in order.
  5. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 24 November 2016 06: 50
    +2
    Quote: 210ox
    The rams themselves all laid out about themselves ..
    They’re rams, but how to assess the actions of our MO that made the decision to switch to electronic identification of military personnel, and even created a vinaigrette on the map from admissions to visiting the dining room and the dentist ??? How not to protect the data - they will inevitably leak through holes in the multifunctional network, and they will never be closed, and how not to encrypt the information, it will still have ultimate durability.
  6. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 24 November 2016 06: 52
    +1
    At the same time, it is not yet said whether the US naval cooperation with Hewlett Packard will continue, which, in fact, cannot ensure the security of the fleet's data.
    The US Navy would do well to consult on this issue with at least Sberbank of Russia. There will be more sense.
  7. Nitarius
    Nitarius 24 November 2016 07: 19
    +1
    that is, THEY DRIVE AND listen to OUR phones .. it is possible! and if we "Kommunizdili" something is ALL KAPUT!
    Well, it wasn’t here ... HANDS guys))
  8. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 24 November 2016 07: 32
    +1
    Let Zadornov be asked, he will give them the whole truth the uterus as it is! !! fool
  9. jovanni
    jovanni 24 November 2016 07: 56
    0
    Fear Navy Seshea! First, the data, and then grandmas from the accounts ... It is not otherwise that Kala and the Senya Rabbit are chemist. You shouldn’t let them into your house - they’ve done something with the Ukrainians ...
  10. prior
    prior 24 November 2016 09: 35
    0
    The main danger of the disclosure of personal data - finally, the world learns about the number of non-traditional employees of the Navy.
  11. skarl
    skarl 24 November 2016 10: 34
    0
    Well ... again, the hand ... you know who ....
  12. thinker
    thinker 24 November 2016 13: 28
    +1
    Quote: skarl
    Well ... again, the hand ... you know who ....