The USA will create a new tank modernization project M1A2 SEP v.4

40
In October last year, the US defense industry first introduced a prototype tank M1A2 Abrams, modernized according to the project SEP v.3. In the foreseeable future, a certain number of armored vehicles available in the troops will have to undergo repairs and updates under the new project, which will allow the continued operation of existing equipment without significant losses in characteristics and capabilities. Deliveries of serial M1A2 SEP v.3 have not yet started, but the military and engineers have already begun work on a new version of the modernization of existing tanks. By analogy with previous projects, the new project received the working name M1A2 SEP v.4.

Plans to create a fourth version of the modernization project for the main Abrams tanks were announced in early November. During the conference, the Association of the US Army (Association of the US Army), several commanders revealed their views on the development of existing and prospective armored vehicles. As it turned out, in the coming decades, the American command plans to dispense with completely new equipment, while maintaining the required combat capability of the troops through timely repair and upgrading of existing samples.



The USA will create a new tank modernization project M1A2 SEP v.4
The first show of the tank M1A2 SEP v.3. Photo Armyrecognition.com


The main armored vehicles of the American army over the next two decades will remain the main battle tank M1A2 Abrams and the combat vehicle M2 Bradley. Only in the mid-thirties will they have to give up their place to new cars of their classes, the development of which should start no earlier than the beginning of the twenties. Thus, until the advent of new types of equipment, the United States Army will have to continue operating the existing fleet of armored vehicles. To extend the resource and increase the potential of technology it is planned to conduct the next modernization.

The development of the M1A2 SEP v.4 modernization project should be completed by the beginning of the next decade. At 2021, the year is scheduled to start testing an experienced tank, refined by a new project. Shortly thereafter, the Pentagon will be able to launch a full-scale program for the repair and updating of armored vehicles. The number of vehicles to be upgraded has not yet been determined. Apparently, work on such aspects of the project will begin later, just before the start of work. It was in the early twenties that the army would be able to study the current state of the fleet of vehicles and draw up plans based on this information.

Like the previous projects of the SEP family (System Enhanced Package - “Advanced Systems Package”), the new SEP v.4 implies a minimal change in the design of existing tanks, which is necessary for the installation of various new types of systems. According to the latest data, during the next modernization, it is planned to renew the electronic equipment, fire control systems and other elements of combat equipment. In addition, it is planned to use new means of increasing survivability on the battlefield, as well as to introduce into the weapons some promising shells.

Some details of the M1A2 SEP v.4 project were recently published by the American edition of Scout Warrior in the article "The Army's More Lethal M1A2 SEP v4 Abrams Tank Variant Will Start Testing in the 2020s". The author of this material, Chris Osborne, spoke with Major General David Bassett, who had previously participated in the creation of the GCS project. The commander commented on some new ideas and technologies that will be used in the next tank modernization project.

First of all, the project M1A2 SEP v.4 involves the use of the most modern means of observation and detection. Thus, to increase this potential, new tanks will have to be equipped with third-generation infrared surveillance systems. The new equipment from the previous equipment of this class will differ in the increased resolution and digital processing of the video signal. The simultaneous use of sensitive elements designed to work with medium and long waves, will increase the observation range and improve the resolution at shorter distances. In addition, the efficiency of optical-electronic systems will increase when working in adverse weather conditions. According to D. Bassett, the crew of the tank will be able with great success to identify enemy fighters with weapons.

It is expected that the infrared systems of the new generation will also be able to detect optics or lasers of the enemy. Thanks to this, the updated tank M1A2 SEP v.4 will be able to quickly find dangerous objects on the battlefield and respond to their presence accordingly. An additional means of detecting enemy equipment will have to be airborne and aft sensors for laser irradiation. With their help, the crew will be able to learn about a possible attack by the enemy.


After updating the electronics, the fighting compartment will be more spacious. Photos of Popularmechanics.com


D. Bassett also said that the updated tanks will have to be equipped with improved sensors of meteorological conditions. One of their main features will be the automatic transfer of data to the fire control system. Due to this, the crew will be spared the need for manual data entry while maintaining the possibility of their full use.

During the modernization of the tanks will lose part of the fire controls, remote commander and gunner, as well as other equipment. Instead, new devices with enhanced performance and improved ergonomics will be installed. In addition, the modular acquisition principle can be used in new consoles, which can simplify the repair and upgrade of electronics. It will also require the installation of new means of communication, which allow receiving data from third-party sources and transmitting independently collected information to other machines. All new equipment will have to communicate using new tires, etc. equipment that meets the requirements of modularity.

It should be noted that the increase in performance is not the only consequence of the renewal of the electronics of crew jobs. Through the use of multifunctional devices, liquid crystal screens, etc. devices can be enhanced convenience of the crew. It is also expected the release of some volumes inside the fighting compartment.

The upcoming modernization will affect weapons, namely the range of ammunition 120-mm smooth-bore guns. The M256 gun itself will not be updated, but a list of used shots awaits a noticeable revision. Currently, an improved multi-purpose projectile AMP (Advanced Multi-Purpose) is being created, which in the future will be able to replace four existing munitions for various purposes at once. It is expected that this will simplify the operation of equipment and to a certain extent increase the combat effectiveness of the tank.

Under the replacement of the AMP projectile will get products M380 HEAT and M380A1 MPAT, having a cumulative warhead. The M380 shot is designed to destroy armored vehicles, and the M380A1 projectile with a dual-mode fuse can also be used against helicopters. HEAT and MPAT shells have been used since the early nineties. It is also planned to decommission the high-explosive fragmentation projectile M1028 with ready-hit elements and the high-explosive M908 ODR, which has a retarder fuse.

According to the results of the planned modernization, four different types of ammunition will be replaced by a single AMP that can solve all their tasks with the same or increased efficiency. The possibility of application for various purposes will be provided by the presence of a programmable fuse with an ADL data transfer system (Ammunition Data Link - “Data Transfer to the Projectile”). During the preparation of the cannon for firing, the fire control system through the ADL device will perform data input into the memory of the fuse. The latter, carrying out the program introduced, will be able to destroy tanks, manpower, aircraft or enemy fortifications.


Prospective shells, the introduction of which will begin in the project SEP v.3. Photo Bmpd.livejournal.com


In the most recent upgrade project, M1A2 SEP v.3, a package of machine design changes has been proposed called ECP (Engineering Change Proposal - “Engineering Engineering Proposal”). In the M1A2 SEP v.4 project, the existing ECP will be continued. As part of the ECP 1 program, a new series of modifications to the existing power plant may emerge, designed to enhance its performance. In addition, M1A2 SEP v.4 tanks will be able to get an improved auxiliary power unit capable of ensuring the operation of new components and assemblies.

One of the consumers of electricity implied by the ECP 1 project is Counter Counter Controlled Improvised Explosive Device — an Electronic Warfare or CREW anti-radio-controlled explosive device system. The CREW product will have to detect the control channels of the enemy and suppress them, not allowing the mine to be broken.

Another characteristic feature of the M1A2 SEP v.4 project, which distinguishes it from previous developments of the SEP family, will be the use of an active protection package. Tanks on the battlefield are still under fire using various anti-tank weapons, the fight against which requires special equipment. The current progress in the field of anti-tank weapons makes it necessary to take appropriate measures. One of the main responses to existing and future threats will be active protection systems.

Currently, the US Army and its scientific organizations are studying the proposals of various defense industry enterprises. Both domestic and foreign developments are studied and verified. In particular, since 2014 in the United States, the Israeli Defense Trophy’s active protection complex has been tested. The possible integration of the protection systems in the onboard equipment complex of the Abrams tanks is also being worked out. It is assumed that active protection will become a full-fledged element of on-board equipment, and not additional attachments.

It is known that American experts have already shown interest in several complexes of active protection of foreign development. This is Rafael's Trophy, Iron Curtain by Artis Corporation, Iron Fist by IMI and ADS by UBT / Rheinmetall. What system will be ordered for use in the upcoming modernization of tanks is unknown. At the same time, it is possible to abandon the purchase of existing systems with the development of a new design of the complex, originally adapted for use on M1A2 SEP v.4 tanks.

As in the case of previous projects, the modernization of the tanks will consist in some minor design changes and major upgrades of the onboard equipment. At the same time, the design of the hull and turret will remain unchanged along with their booking, power plant, transmission, running gear, etc. Thus, the updated tank externally will be minimally different from the base one. In addition, some characteristics, primarily related to the mobility of equipment, will remain at the same level.


M1A2 SEP v.3 under test. Photo Nationalinterest.org


According to existing plans announced a few days ago, the development of the System Enhanced Package v.4 project will continue until the beginning of the next decade. Approximately in 2021, the first prototype of such a main tank will be tested. According to the results of his inspections, the timing of the modernization of the equipment of the combatant units, as well as the scope of the program, will be determined. The United States has several thousand M1A2 Abrams tanks of all modifications, of which around 1600 machines have been updated by the SEP v.2 project. In the foreseeable future, the existing M1A2 SEP v.2 will have to undergo retrofitting on the “third” project. Later, some of the equipment will be upgraded in the framework of a promising program, the development of which will be completed early in the next decade.

In case of successful implementation of all planned work on the project M1A2 SEP v.4 at the beginning of the next decade, the United States will be able to start a program to repair and upgrade existing armored vehicles. Within a few years, the army will receive a certain number of tanks with extended life, improved equipment and enhanced performance. This technique will remain in operation for some time. At the moment, the beginning of the supply of promising tanks of a completely new type belongs to the 2035 year. Thus, the armored vehicles of the Abrams family can remain in service almost until the beginning of the forties.

Recently announced plans for the further development of the US armored vehicle park show a curious trend. Over the past decades, American designers have created several projects of promising main tanks, designed to replace the M1 Abrams family of vehicles, but none of them advanced beyond the prototype testing stage. The lack of a full-fledged replacement of existing tanks in combination with new threats characteristic of modern conflicts has led to the emergence of several tank modernization projects. The development of completely new machines, however, was stopped.

According to the latest data, the creation of a promising American tank will be launched only in the first years of the next decade. By the mid-twenties it is planned to build and submit for testing the first prototype. The next few years will be devoted to the continuation of inspections and fine-tuning of equipment. By the mid-thirties, the tank would have to go into a series, after which the gradual replacement of the Abrams vehicles available in the troops would begin.

Such plans of the Pentagon and the defense industry may look ambiguous in the light of foreign work in the field of armored vehicles. The main competitors of the United States in the field of armaments and military equipment continue to create new types of tanks, including using revolutionary new solutions. Against this background, the next Abrams modernization project with the transfer of the development of promising technology for several years ahead looks specifically. Moreover, there is a reason for accusations of lagging behind competitors and unwillingness to return to the leading positions.

The US Army has chosen an ambiguous method of developing its tanks, but it seems that it does not intend to abandon it. In the foreseeable future, the operation of existing tanks will continue, and the equipment will undergo repairs and upgrades from time to time. Only two decades later, the troops will begin to receive a truly new technique. Perhaps this way of updating the fleet of armored vehicles does not look very successful, but the American command chose him. So, following the updated M1A2 SEP v.3 tanks, the troops will have to master the improved M1A2 SEP v.4.


On the materials of the sites:
http://breakingdefense.com/
http://scout.com/
http://armyrecognition.com/
http://army-guide.com/
http://nationalinterest.org/
http://globalsecurity.org/
http://gurkhan.blogspot.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    22 November 2016 06: 55
    In principle, this only tells one thing that the United States clearly defined for itself the boundaries of possible conflicts for years on 30 ahead. And a full-scale war is not included in these plans.
    1. +10
      22 November 2016 07: 59
      And this is also an answer to all paranoid "do Americans want war"
      1. +7
        22 November 2016 09: 49
        Quote: Turai
        And this is also an answer to all paranoid "do Americans want war"

        They want to.
        1. +8
          22 November 2016 10: 37
          IS-80_RVGK2 Want.


          I agree with you, but for the crafty people.

          And this is also an answer to all paranoid "do Americans want war"


          The answer is obvious, since the days of Pearl Harbar, Americans are fighting exclusively in the air,
          Vietnam, Iraq, Yugoslavia ...... and so on ....


          And the fact that Americans do not spend money on ground troops, and billions of dollars are spent on the Air Force, invisible planes of all kinds, the F-22 Raptor, and there’s nothing to say about drones, on unmanned aerial vehicles, the program of which even includes remodeling F- robots 16, F-15 Americans pledged funds equal to the entire budget of the military RF for the army and navy, this fact is additional confirmation.

          So the six-pointed allies of the United States are cunning, molding nonsense .... modern war is not the occupation of a territory, but the destruction of all industry from the "air", with the subsequent establishment of its own controlled puppet government, such as Marshal Peten in France.
          1. +4
            22 November 2016 12: 36
            for: N100
            "modern war is not the occupation of the territory, but the destruction
            the whole industry with "" air "" "," ////

            Why, then, Russia holds such a number of tanks, increases ground forces, Armata now developed?
            The Americans, as you yourself have proved, are not going to occupy, but only to bomb.
            It seems that it’s necessary (according to your logic) to invest money only in aviation and missiles,
            to repel an aerial invasion of Americans.
            But no, in Russia several new motorized rifle divisions are being formed. What for?
            1. +7
              22 November 2016 14: 20
              Quote: voyaka uh
              But no, in Russia several new motorized rifle divisions are being formed. What for?

              I apologize to Alexei, have you looked at a geographical map for a long time? Do you know who the United States and Russia border with?
              1. +1
                22 November 2016 18: 24
                I just do not agree with the N100. Russia needs strong ground forces
                (although not by creating new divisions, and not by the guard, but by modernizing the existing ones).
                But not against the Americans. And for future local conflicts from the south.
                And against China ..
            2. +2
              22 November 2016 21: 18
              Because the B-52 does not always reach its destination, the Air Force and Air Defense of the Russian Federation will not give the enemy an advantage over the theater of war and the usual chopping with tanks, artillery and other things will begin. Only TNW will be added .... and then God himself ordered.
          2. 0
            23 November 2016 15: 21
            Conference of Geopolitics. At last. It has not been a long time.
            Quote: N100
            since Pearl Harbar, Americans have been fighting exclusively in the air,


            Is the man on the left a pilot?
            Quote: N100
            billions of dollars are spending

            Interest on the budget do not want to calculate?
            Quote: N100
            modern war is not the occupation of a territory, but the destruction of the entire industry from the "air"

            Who did they destroy it? Serbia? Libya? Eliminated the main competitors?
            By the way. With Iran, it helped to simply wrap the crane. On the other side. Doesn't bother?
            Quote: N100
            governments such as Marshal Pitin in France.

            Petena. And whose puppet was he? Is at least one acting American puppet government known? Merkel and Poroshenko did not offer.
            1. 0
              18 December 2016 10: 29
              Why not offer? Because they are puppet, but is it difficult to recognize? And Japan, and South Korea? Such technological revolutions and take-offs there began after the American occupation! But such a point of view is at least not universally recognized, at least for the time being the signs of puppet management are being lost, but how to regard the modern government of Iraq, if not puppet?
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_Provision
              al_Authority
              By the way, does Biden come to head the Rada ceremonial meeting again? Or not, is it still not puppet?
              1. 0
                18 December 2016 15: 10
                Quote: Navigator Basov
                And Japan, and South Korea?

                They forgot Adenauer, who was directly appointed by the occupation administration .. If they were all American puppets, then this is just a jackpot, as it seems to me.

                As for Merkel, the EU economy is approximately equal to (a little more, a little less, how to count) the US economy. If your Washington regional committee is in charge of a region comparable to the United States in all respects, then you are no longer in the regional committee, right in ZOG.
                Quote: Navigator Basov
                how to regard the modern government of Iraq

                Quote: Navigator Basov
                Biden again comes to head the solemn meeting of the Rada

                Unfortunately, the last two governments differ sharply from the first three. I don’t really follow Ukrainian affairs, but, kmk, Mr. Poroshenko works in the style of the late Mr. Maskhadov: "Dengi are taking over, but we are not selling." That is, wherever Biden goes, neither Adenauer nor Park Chung Hee, Mr. Poroshenko will not.
                So no, not puppets. Thieves with pro-American chatter. And tomorrow anti-American. And in a week they will sell to China. And in a month, China will be thrown. The matter is lively, fun.

                I note in parentheses that if, as the Russian media broadcast, Iraq would really have given Dick Cheney for personal use, like the Belgian Congo at one time, there would probably not have been the mess and blood that are now there.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. 0
                  18 December 2016 20: 29
                  Quote: Octopus
                  If your Washington regional committee is in charge of a region comparable to the United States in all respects, then you are no longer in the regional committee, right in ZOG.
                  Pff-ff, why the region? One Germany is enough, it will arrange the Fourth Reich there in the whole region. First time, perhaps? The methods are new, the essence is the same.
                  Quote: Octopus
                  Unfortunately, the last two governments are very different from the first three.
                  Of course, much to your regret, precisely because they are different: not so long ago they brought democracy there, they are still not democratic enough. Hundreds of thousands of people were not destroyed there by a couple of nuclear bombs.
                  Quote: Octopus
                  That is wherever Biden goes
                  So he still rides, and not like our former ministers and chess players - to cry, but to ask for money to bombard Russia with peaceful carpet bombing, and on the contrary, to distribute the Central Administration.
                  Quote: Octopus
                  I note in parentheses that if, as the Russian media broadcast, Iraq would really have given Dick Cheney for personal use, like the Belgian Congo at one time, there would probably not have been the mess and blood that are now there.
                  Dadadad, it was with the arrival of the Americans that there was more order there. As in any place, with the arrival of the Americans, there is always more order, peace, and prosperity. And Stephen Kinzer did not write Overthrow: America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq, America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq.
                  1. +1
                    18 December 2016 22: 33
                    Quote: Navigator Basov
                    One Germany is enough, it will arrange the Fourth Reich there in the whole region. First time, perhaps?

                    You mean that Mr. Hitler was a Roosevelt / Rockefeller / Mason puppet? Yes, then you have a long list of puppets, it is unlikely that you will be able to convince you.
                    I doubt, by the way, that you were considering the idea of ​​who the puppet Yeltsin could appoint as president of the Russian Federation.
                    Quote: Navigator Basov
                    Hundreds of thousands of people were not destroyed there by a couple of nuclear bombs.

                    You, of course, may have your own opinion, but I am almost sure that Poroshenko will not become Adenauer, no matter how much his bomb.
                    Quote: Navigator Basov
                    Of course, much to your regret

                    Yes, I treat Ukrainians with warmth. And the government of old-school American puppets - like in Germany, Japan, or Korea - is the best thing that can happen to a country. It is a pity that the Americans gave up on this. We switched to the so-called. "democracy".
                    Quote: Navigator Basov
                    TSU to distribute.

                    Again. No matter how hard Biden tries, Poroshenko will not become Adenauer. And he cannot protect American interests. Because, kmk, can more or less nothing but lies and theft. However, I follow his activity a little, I can be mistaken.
                    Quote: Navigator Basov
                    it was with the advent of the Americans that there was more order

                    If you read the text that you quoted, you will see that I’m just not happy with the US actions in Iraq. When it is not clear what you want, some garbage is sure to come out. She went out.
                    I don’t know about your book, of course. Judging by the title - another leftist delirium. Unlike Russia, where the ass you know is licked and the so-called. "patriots", etc. "Communists", in the United States, both (up to Cruise) and others (Sanders) hate Washington and harm it to the best of their ability. At least they try to make that impression.
                    Not sure I want to read this. I'll think about it.
                    1. 0
                      19 December 2016 21: 40
                      Quote: Octopus
                      Not sure I want to read this. I'll think about it.

                      Hmm.
                      Nice little book. Thank.
                      The author, of course, is a stubborn leftist, as I expected. However, he expounds a lot of facts, and they (facts) often endure him on quite indisputable things. Aside from his "opinions" about imperialism (fu-fu), capitalism (bloody grin) and multiculturalism (oh, how good), these are instructive stories.
        2. +4
          22 November 2016 10: 40
          IS-80_RVGK2 witnesses will now fly the stars of David, and without meaningful comments to you, they will push my answer, which is not convenient for them, into the middle of the forum.
        3. Alf
          +3
          22 November 2016 19: 29
          Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
          They want to.

          They want to. Alien hands and in someone else's territory.
      2. +6
        22 November 2016 10: 13
        "They want", "don't want" - what's the difference? They consistently increase its likelihood.
      3. +2
        22 November 2016 15: 55
        If they will fight, then with the wrong hands.
      4. +2
        22 November 2016 21: 23
        The Americans lay the superiority of their technology to sharply reduce losses in local wars. With such a saturation of the anti-tank systems of anti-tank systems and anti-tank vehicles, more or less medium and large operations are not possible with minimal losses .. no matter how you underestimate the combat efficiency of KORNETs and Metisov and Chrysanthemums ... Therefore, without KAZ systems and information systems on armored vehicles, a democratic state with free the press will not be able to fight with small losses ...
    2. +1
      22 November 2016 09: 49
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      In principle, this only tells one thing that the United States clearly defined for itself the boundaries of possible conflicts for years on 30 ahead. And a full-scale war is not included in these plans.

      Why did it happen?
    3. +3
      22 November 2016 11: 20
      A competent approach in military construction. The priority is naturally in the Air Force and Navy. They bombed a likely enemy from a distance a century ago. The time for tank wedges has passed.
      1. +4
        22 November 2016 16: 17
        Quote: xetai9977
        The time for tank wedges has passed.

        How to say, when Iraq broke up, then of course they first bombed, and then the ground part of the operation began. And then the divisions advanced in the best traditions of the 2nd World War. Another thing is that the Iraqi obsolete equipment was destroyed by overwhelming fire superiority from the ground and from the air, but however, armored units were used to their fullest.
      2. +3
        22 November 2016 21: 14
        In the USA it didn’t come ... but in Eurasia, the best fighter is a tank at the enemy’s airfield .... Tanks supported by army aviation and artillery will be a terrible force for a long time ...
      3. +1
        23 November 2016 21: 47
        Well, well ... Therefore, probably, Russia, China, India, Israel, and the USA themselves have a large tank fleet?
        Abrams' problem is not that this is a supposedly bad tank. This is a normal combat vehicle, but when it was created, it was sharpened exclusively for anti-tank actions (which, in principle, is confirmed by the reservation). The question is different, from the very beginning Abrams could have had AZ (it was abandoned in order to save money - the version with AZ and other "nyashki" turned out to be very expensive at that time), but instead of putting a tower on it for a long time (by analogy with Leclerc (AZ in the stern, outside the manned compartment)) the Americans are still loading the loader with the work, as if the years of the DB had not taught them to save every extra cubic centimeter and ensure a constant rate of fire when suppressing the enemy in the city.
        1. 0
          23 February 2017 21: 46
          Quote: Blackgrifon
          During the years of the database they were not taught to save every extra cubic centimeter and to ensure a constant rate of fire while suppressing the enemy in the city.

          You look at what happens to the rate of fire after emptying the loading mechanism ?.
          Apparently the database years taught them that another crew member has a high enough value for the work of this very crew.
    4. +1
      22 November 2016 18: 34
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      In principle, this only tells one thing that the United States clearly defined for itself the boundaries of possible conflicts for years on 30 ahead. And a full-scale war is not included in these plans.


      There is an opinion that the path that the Americans have taken in the development of armaments, in principle, excludes a full-scale war. She simply will not have money. I was thinking while reading: how much does a modern tank cost with such a set of equipment? But this despite the fact that the life time of a tank on a modern battlefield, as you know, is calculated in minutes. By the way, the story of seventy years ago is already a good example. German equipment was much more technologically advanced than ours, but at the same time it was more expensive, more difficult to maintain, but most importantly, much less reliable. Ours, by a combination of qualities, was much more effective. The same, the Americans noted, if we recall another case when during the Cold War era, our pilot stole a MiG-25 to Japan. In particular, the conclusion of the Americans was that, despite the obvious lag in the element base, the aircraft, more than any American, was most effective in fulfilling its main task of catching up and destroying.
      And the topic of the great war with the United States, as many experts again write, was finally closed by the Syrian operation.
  2. +5
    22 November 2016 07: 17
    A tank such a colossus without changing it externally, you can convert it into any tank you like.
    1. +3
      22 November 2016 19: 29
      Yes, Vladimir, you can redo it ... Only! A Negro is still needed, KOCHEHAROM .. More precisely, a loader.
      1. +1
        23 November 2016 08: 55
        the main problem is to have a brain for the implementation of the project, the successful use of the full volume.
  3. +6
    22 November 2016 07: 20
    This suggests that the states clearly understand the priorities of modern war: First, victory in the nuclear confrontation and in the political arena, then victory in the air, and then (third in importance) there is a ground conflict ... That’s a lot of work in the field strategic weapons, anti-ballistic systems, several programs of new generation aircraft .. But the armored vehicles are simply being upgraded. Fortunately, the initially selected concept allows it to have a certain modernization potential.
  4. +6
    22 November 2016 07: 34
    Abrams was originally created as a 65t platform, there is great potential for various upgrades. The main issue is protection, as ATGM of the 80s proved to be quite suitable for hitting such vehicles ... and with the appearance of domestic or Chinese ATGMs attacking from above, the% loss will continue to grow. It is no longer possible to increase the armor, and the KAZ detection systems and systems are being considered. In our case, the T-90 platform no longer has the opportunity to increase weight, as much as possible that it squeezed the T-90MS.
    1. +6
      22 November 2016 08: 00
      They are going to put our KAZ Trophy (windbreaker)
  5. +1
    22 November 2016 09: 13
    Surely the budget of these upgrades will be sky-high.
    If Trump does not take on a public debt.
  6. +1
    22 November 2016 10: 51
    We wouldn’t climb everywhere with their troubles, and these tanks would be unnecessary. In the foreseeable future, no one is going to attack the United States, no matter how much they shout about it, therefore, there is no need to rush to develop new technology.
    1. 0
      22 November 2016 21: 11
      ..a projection of power to other regions? Who will oppose China and the Russian Federation?
    2. 0
      23 February 2017 21: 49
      and in what place do they "yell" about it?
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    28 November 2016 16: 02
    Quote: Aaron Zawi
    In principle, this only tells one thing that the United States clearly defined for itself the boundaries of possible conflicts for years on 30 ahead. And a full-scale war is not included in these plans.

    Full-scale WWII-style wars will never happen again. Everyone has been ready for them for a long time. There will be such a "new struggle for peace" that there will be no stone unturned.
    Although it seems to have someone said to me.
  9. +1
    2 December 2016 20: 33
    Well, they are driving their entire tank fleet to the "Wheelbarrow for pumping", well, they will put plasma and an advanced audio system inside, ... but only, they are thinking of changing that huge black man in the bowels of the tank for an automatic loader)))
  10. +1
    2 December 2016 21: 01
    The National Interes, "Murzilka" for adults)))
  11. +2
    3 December 2016 21: 47
    Well, cho ... the bodywork still suffers, there is no through rust. You can play a little undercarriage and refresh the interior. And you can still ride.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"