Military Review

In the American magazine spoke about the positive for Washington from the possible warming of relations between the US and Russia

39
The American edition of "Foreign Policy" published an article in which reflections are given on whether relative stability will come to geopolitics due to the election of Donald Trump as US President or not. The author of the article is Edward Luttwak, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.


According to him, those who consider the future policy of Donald Trump to be “radical” and “unprofessional” should temper the ardor of their criticism. Luttwak notes that outside radicalism (namely, Trump’s election statements were presented to representatives of the American elites) is a rational and pragmatic approach.

In the American magazine spoke about the positive for Washington from the possible warming of relations between the US and Russia


The author of the material in the FP writes that if Donald Trump establishes relations with the Russian Federation, you will not need to not only break spears regarding NATO expansion to the east, but also directly increase the strength of the North Atlantic military bloc at the expense of American funds. Of material:

If Trump’s policy towards Russia is successful, then at the same time there will be a certain detente in relations, there will be no need to send an additional contingent of American troops to Europe to strengthen NATO.


The submission says that Trump constantly spoke about justice within the framework of NATO, which should also be expressed in fair investments. Today, NATO exists mainly at the expense of American taxpayers. According to Trump, if other countries of the military bloc want to increase their own security, then this should be provided by their taxpayers, but not by the US. On this basis, the article concludes that Trump’s policy toward the North Atlantic Alliance will first be understood by ordinary American citizens and is unlikely to be left without support from those.
Photos used:
https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump
39 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The black
    The black 19 November 2016 07: 01
    +18
    In my opinion, most Russians have a certain euphoria about Trump’s policy towards Russia. Personally, I would not be so optimistic. After being elected president, Trump has not said anything yet, and we are already peace, friendship, balalaika. It would be bitter to not be disappointed then.
    Trump is the president of a powerful power that considers and will consider Russia as its adversary.
    If our relations change even for the better, then it’s good.
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 19 November 2016 07: 07
      +9
      In my opinion, most Russians have a certain euphoria about Trump’s policy towards Russia.


      No euphoria ... rather fortunetelling on the coffee grounds ...
      this OBAMA is so tired of everyone including the Americans that everyone wants something new, tasty and preferably without subsequent diarrhea in the toilet ... and it rarely happens in life ... so we have patience and look forward to the continuation of the new SANTA BARBARA series from American politics .
      1. The black
        The black 19 November 2016 07: 17
        +4
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        We look forward to continuing the new series of SANTA BARBARA from American politics.

        May there be no "Santa Barbara" after the Inuguration Republicans have a Republican majority in Congress. Everything will be smooth there. Another thing is that Trump (I hope) will nevertheless fulfill his election promises about domestic politics and will build roads, improve medical services, and what he promised them there. And in light of this, he will stop pumping billions into such fake projects as, for example, Ukraine. Although this is hard to believe ... but hopefully. smile
        1. Same lech
          Same lech 19 November 2016 07: 22
          +1
          .
          Although I believe it with great difficulty ... but I want to hope. smile

          smile And if he gets off course? ... whether he will remember the fate of Kennedy or Nixon.
          1. The black
            The black 19 November 2016 07: 45
            +6
            Quote: The same LYOKHA
            And if he gets off course? ... whether he will remember the fate of Kennedy or Nixon.

            It may well. Although, here, as they say, the cadres decide. It is not in vain that the first appointments are the director of the CIA and the national security adviser ...
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 19 November 2016 09: 25
              0
              Unfortunately, the reasoning of ALL analysts never takes into account the globalist aspirations of the Zionist clan of Rothschild bankers-usurers to their own - NAD-national - world domination. The financial capitalist-bankers of the Rothschilds, with their cynical racism in relation to all other peoples and countries, are not used to staging coups, revolutions, civil wars, including the WWII and WWII. And the third MV is also very happy with them! The United States, after all, has long been not an independent power.
              -----------------------------------
              16.11.2016 above is an interesting article that concerns both this and other aspects of political life. Namely, "Rothschild built financial troops" with a "complete" LIST OF BANKS, cat. are under the control of the Rothschilds in recognition of himself:
              1. Bank of Afghanistan. 2. Bank of Albania. 3. Bank of Algeria. 4. Central Bank of Argentina. 5. Central Bank of Armenia. 6. Central Bank of Aruba. 7. Reserve Bank of Australia. 8. Austrian National Bank. 9. Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic. 10 Central Bank of The Bahamas. 11 Central Bank of Bahrain. 12 Bangladesh Bank. 13 Central Bank of Barbados. 14 National Bank of the Republic of Belarus. 15 National Bank of Belgium. 16 Central Bank of Belize. 17 Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 18 Bermuda Monetary Authority. 19 Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan. 20 Central Bank of Bolivia. 21 Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 22 Bank of Botswana. 23 Central Bank of Brazil. 24 Bulgarian National Bank. 25 Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 26 Bank of the Republic of Burundi. 27 National Bank of Cambodia. 28 Came Roon: Bank of Central African States. 29 Bank of Canada - Banque du Canada. 30 Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. 31 Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States. 32 Chad: Bank of Central African States. 33 Central Bank of Chile. 34 The People's Bank of China. 35 Colombia: Bank of the Republic. 36 Central Bank of Comoros. 37 Congo: Bank of Central African States. 38 Central Bank of Costa Rica. 39 Côte d'Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 40 Croatian National Bank. 41 Central Bank of Cuba. 42 Central Bank of Cyprus. 43 Czech Republic: Czech National Bank. 44 National Bank of Denmark. 45 Central Bank of the Dominican Republic. 46 East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank. 47 Central Bank of Ecuador. 48 Central Bank of Egypt. 49 Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador. 50 Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States. 51 Bank of Estonia. 52 National Bank of Ethiopia. 53 European Union: European Central Bank. 54 Reserve Bank of Fiji. 55 Bank of Finland. 56 Bank of France. 57 Gabon: Bank of Central African States. 58 Central Bank of The Gambia. 59 National Bank of Georgia. 60 Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank. 61 Bank of Ghana. 62 Bank of Greece. 63 Bank of Guatemala. 64 Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 65 Bank of Guyana. 66 Central Bank of Haiti. 67 Central Bank of Honduras. 68 Hong Kong Monetary Authority. 69 Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank. 70 Central Bank of Iceland. 71 Reserve Bank of India. 72 Bank Indonesia. 73 Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 74 Central Bank of Iraq. 75 Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland. 76 Bank of Israel. 77 Bank of Italy. 78 Bank of Jamaica. 79 Bank of Japan. 90 Central Bank of Jordan. 91 National Bank of Kazakhstan. 92 Central Bank of Kenya. 93 Bank of Korea. 94 Central Bank of Kuwait. 95 Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic. 96 Bank of Latvia. 97 Central Bank of Lebanon. 98 Central Bank of Lesotho. 99 Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest). 100 Central Bank of Uruguay. 101 Bank of Lithuania. 102 Central Bank of Luxembourg. 103 Monetary Authority of Macao. 104 National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia. 105 Central Bank of Madagascar. 106 Reserve Bank of Malawi. 107 Central Bank of Malaysia. 108 Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 109 Central Bank of Malta. 110 Bank of Mauritius. 111 Bank of Mexico. 112 National Bank of Moldova. 113 Bank of Mongolia. 114 Central Bank of Montenegro. 115 Bank of Morocco. 116 Bank of Mozambique. 117 Bank of Namibia. 118 Central Bank of Nepal. 119 Netherlands Bank. 120 Bank of the Netherlands Antilles. 121 Reserve Bank of New Zealand. 122 Central Bank of Nicaragua. 123 Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 124 Central Bank of Nigeria. 125 Central Bank of Norway. 126 Central Bank of Oman. 127 State Bank of Pakistan. 128 Bank of Papua New Guinea. 129 Central Bank of Paraguay. 130 Central Reserve Bank of Peru. 131 Philip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. 132 National Bank of Poland. 133 Bank of Portugal. 134 Qatar Central Bank. 135 National Bank of Romania. 136 National Bank of Rwanda. 137 Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino. 138 Central Bank of Samoa. 139 Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency. 140 Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 141 National Bank of Serbia. 142 Central Bank of Seychelles. 143 Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone. 144 Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore. 145 National Bank of Slovakia. 146 Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia. 147 Central Bank of the Solomon Islands. 148 South African Reserve Bank. 149 Bank of Spain. 150 Central Bank of Sri Lanka. 151 Bank of Sudan. 152 Central Bank of Suriname. 153 The Central Bank of Swaziland. 154 Sveriges Riksbank. 155 Swiss National Bank. 156 National Bank of Tajikistan. 157 Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania. 158 Bank of Thailand. 159 Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO). 160 National Reserve Bank of Tonga. 161 Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago. 162 Central Bank of Tunisia. 163 Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. 164 Bank of Uganda. 165 National Bank of Ukraine. 166 Central Bank of United Arab Emirates. 167 United Kingdom: Bank of England. 168 United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 169 Reserve Bank of Vanuatu. 170 Central Bank of Venezuela. 171 The State Bank of Vietnam. 172 Central Bank of Yemen. 173 Bank of Zambia. 174
              TOTAL One can guess from this what policy, contrary to common sense, the UN and all other international “offices” will conduct in relation to the Russian Federation and other countries, as well as to Trump (the new US president).
              First of all. The list contains 174 banks, while UN member countries 193 and the Rothschilds are rumored to have UNLIMITED influence in all of these countries, with the exception of 5.
              Second. The list also includes banks that the Rothschilds do not own, which means they have some other leverage. Until recently, there were only 5 independent State Banks in the world, and, consequently, 5 of the UN member countries: Belarus, Venezuela, Vietnam, Cuba and Syria. However, they, too, were found in the list: 14, 170, 171, 41. There are no exact data regarding Iran and North Korea.
              Of the above INDEPENDENT states in the list is NOT only Syria. Formerly, an independent banking system was owned, for example, by Libya and Iraq, whose sad fate is known to us. There is a war in Syria, and in this, Surely a BIG SHARE of ROTHSCHILD GUILT - a recognized "controller of the State Banks".
              See in detail - http://finobzor.ru/show-25637-rotshild-vystroil-f
              inansovye-voyska.html
      2. 210ox
        210ox 19 November 2016 08: 48
        +3
        No, all the same "euphoria" is present, I judge it by conversations at work. I am generally surprised by such attention to other people's elections and a nation alien to us. US policy will remain unchanged, even a sharp exacerbation is quite possible. Well, there can be no democracy. American "no war ..
        Quote: The same Lech
        In my opinion, most Russians have a certain euphoria about Trump’s policy towards Russia.


        No euphoria ... rather fortunetelling on the coffee grounds ...
        this OBAMA is so tired of everyone including the Americans that everyone wants something new, tasty and preferably without subsequent diarrhea in the toilet ... and it rarely happens in life ... so we have patience and look forward to the continuation of the new SANTA BARBARA series from American politics .
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 19 November 2016 07: 10
      +4
      Poroshenko was not invited to the inauguration of Trump. The man will be completely drunk. laughing
      1. 210ox
        210ox 19 November 2016 08: 50
        +3
        Moreover, here the inauguration is invited according to the tradition of the closest ones .. Servants and servants are always at the door ..
        Quote: siberalt
        Poroshenko was not invited to the inauguration of Trump. The man will be completely drunk. laughing
    3. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 19 November 2016 07: 41
      +2
      Quote: Black
      In my opinion, most Russians have a certain euphoria about Trump’s policy towards Russia.

      There is no euphoria, everyone understands that it is unlikely that something will change. But you can dream up ... Imagine us and the United States, in normal, smooth, contractual relations, when no one, no one is deceiving, and the competition is fair ...? Presented?
      This is a different world, much better than now.
    4. OLD FART
      OLD FART 19 November 2016 08: 29
      +1
      Quote: Black
      In my opinion, most Russians have a certain euphoria about Trump’s policy towards Russia. Personally, I would not be so optimistic.

      Yes, no one hopes for "friendship" ... Simply, at least there will be a little respite for Russia, while they have a shake-up there, etc ... If the bitch is Clinton, then the pressure on Russia would immediately increase significantly .... The mongrels then quieted down for a while ..
      The goal of Russia and other countries is to "bring down" the United States and the first task is to take away the "printing press" ... So "an eternal battle, we only dream of peace ..."
      1. 210ox
        210ox 19 November 2016 08: 53
        +2
        A break, do you think? And what, do we need a break? It is sometimes necessary to maintain a rhythm, and a second wind is on the way. You can’t relax!
        Quote: STARPER
        Quote: Black
        In my opinion, most Russians have a certain euphoria about Trump’s policy towards Russia. Personally, I would not be so optimistic.

        Yes, no one hopes for "friendship" ... Simply, at least there will be a little respite for Russia, while they have a shake-up there, etc ... If the bitch is Clinton, then the pressure on Russia would immediately increase significantly .... The mongrels then quieted down for a while ..
        The goal of Russia and other countries is to "bring down" the United States and the first task is to take away the "printing press" ... So "an eternal battle, we only dream of peace ..."
        1. OLD FART
          OLD FART 19 November 2016 08: 57
          0
          Quote: 210ox
          A break, do you think? And what, we need a smoke break

          You need to regroup, upgrade your equipment, etc. And then another blow! soldier
          1. 210ox
            210ox 19 November 2016 09: 10
            +1
            Vitaly, I agree about the materiel. As for the printing press, it will not work in the foreseeable future. For two hundred countries are tied to it, even in Belarus, settlements between people, well, at the household level only in bucks.
            1. OLD FART
              OLD FART 19 November 2016 09: 15
              0
              Quote: 210ox
              Vitaly, I agree about the materiel. With regard to the printing press, it will not work out in the foreseeable future.,

              We in Russia do not need easy victories, we usually have a global scale ... The matter is not simple and dangerous, and yet work is underway! hi And there are already some shifts ...
    5. Titsen
      Titsen 19 November 2016 11: 04
      0
      Quote: Black
      If our relations change even for the better, then it’s good.


      Perfect judgment! +

      Trump is strong and will act only from a position of strength, although not brute, but strength!
  2. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 19 November 2016 07: 06
    +1
    drinks It is better to knock down a glass at a friendly table and sing songs than to not trust and fight.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 19 November 2016 07: 11
      +4
      Quote: Spartanez300
      knock down a glass and make friends

      a moot point, after a glass of wine begins the search for truth and justice ... lol
      1. OLD FART
        OLD FART 19 November 2016 08: 32
        +6
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        Quote: Spartanez300
        knock down a glass and make friends

        a moot point, after a glass of wine begins the search for truth and justice ... lol

        Joke remembered.
        Yesterday I drank vodka with the Russians all night ..
        All night they proved to me how bad Russia is ...
        In the morning I agreed and they filled my face ..)))))
        laughing
  3. The black
    The black 19 November 2016 07: 18
    0
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    a moot point, after a glass of wine the search for truth and justice begins.

    YES ... and the question "who is your friend?" wassat
  4. jovanni
    jovanni 19 November 2016 07: 18
    +8
    Quote: siberalt
    Poroshenko was not invited to the inauguration of Trump. The man will be completely drunk. laughing


    Who is the man?
  5. jovanni
    jovanni 19 November 2016 07: 21
    0
    Well. And the first swallows flew from the American media ...
  6. aszzz888
    aszzz888 19 November 2016 07: 33
    0
    Yeah, today in mericatosia, the "attorneys" from the states must speak and announce the FINAL election results. Maybe a sensation will pop up!
    1. The black
      The black 19 November 2016 07: 36
      +1
      Quote: aszzz888
      from the states and announce the FINAL election results. Maybe a sensation will pop up!

      The final results will be in December - when it becomes known how the electors voted.
      1. Delink
        Delink 19 November 2016 07: 55
        0
        Yes, even if they choose Trump, they will arrange an impeachment in a year or two. There, most of the people are behind Klimaks.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 November 2016 07: 43
    +7
    Hope for Trump, but don’t be bad. This is to ensure that in February it will be a little clear who Trump is and what really can be expected from him. But you always need to proceed from the worst case and be prepared for it.
    1. Smog
      Smog 19 November 2016 08: 14
      +4
      you need to start from the worst case and be prepared for it.

      therefore
      Si vis pacem, bellum for
      soldier
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 19 November 2016 09: 33
        +1
        You are right here. "If you want peace, prepare for war."
  8. Niccola Mack
    Niccola Mack 19 November 2016 08: 11
    +3
    Today, NATO exists mainly at the expense of American taxpayers.

    A primitive view of things!
    The US military budget exists due to actively printed green wrappers, which everyone in the world takes without looking.
    Including in the form of state treasury bonds.
    So it’s not only American taxpayers who finance (and not so much).
  9. BOB044
    BOB044 19 November 2016 08: 24
    0
    I hope that the benefits of cooperation will win and relations will be beneficial for Russia and the United States.
  10. The black
    The black 19 November 2016 08: 28
    +1
    Quote: Delink
    Yes, even if they choose Trump, they will arrange an impeachment in a year or two. There, most of the people are behind Klimaks.

    The people there do not solve such issues. Congress The majority of republicans are there. To impeach his party member is to invest a huge trump card for the democrats for the future. Trump is, with a high degree of probability, a candidate for one term. Age. So with all the dislike of fellow party members to Trump, they will not allow impeachment.
    1. Niccola Mack
      Niccola Mack 19 November 2016 12: 27
      0
      Trump is, with a high degree of probability, a candidate for one term. Age.

      McCain ran for an even greater age!
      Remember Matt Damon said that if suddenly he (McCain) is elected, he will most likely be bent within the term and this "star" Palin will be president.
      So McCain is still not going to the box (although it's time).
      And Trump can easily survive 2 terms.
  11. vfqjh
    vfqjh 19 November 2016 13: 10
    +1
    How can I not understand these IDEAS that living in peace and harmony is much calmer and more profitable for everyone.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 19 November 2016 18: 32
      0
      Quote: vfqjh
      How can I not understand these IDEAS that living in peace and harmony is much calmer and more profitable for everyone.

      and THEY live in peace and harmony, and "idiots" by their order, fight and fight, but somewhere out there ... far from THEM .....
  12. koshmarik
    koshmarik 19 November 2016 15: 16
    +1
    All forecasts about future relations between Russia and the United States are still at the level of more or less probable "conclusions" of analysts or idle philistine speculations. Everything will become clear after a well-prepared fundamental meeting between Putin and Trump. Let's wait.
  13. antivirus
    antivirus 19 November 2016 17: 49
    0
    There will be fencing of their "possessions".
    For 10-15 years we will be locked up in that perimeter, which we can (including force) to keep. Who did not hide ...
    Trump will pursue a tougher and more unambiguous US policy towards the entire "non-American world." These cowboys, shepherds, do not care about the rules of the WTO and the Trans Pacific and the Atlantic partnership.
    Our goal (in these 10-15 years) is to live our minds on our land and on our own money.
    15 years - the cycle of putting on the wing of a new aircraft with a new engine, the production of new managers (as N Gubenko grew up in a boarding school), the implementation of the road construction program of 10 tons km + repair of 30 thousand km. and each add your own point (for example, the production and consumption of milk per capita \ liters per year. without foreign capital)
    Tr MV there will be no guarantees. that victory will be easy
  14. Region39
    Region39 19 November 2016 18: 05
    0
    NATO, as it was, will continue to exist and it is unlikely that this bloc will be reoriented to the fight against terrorism. It will remain as a certain irritant for Russia and as a tool for destabilizing situations in the world. Trump will simply force Europe to pay the maximum for this, and the taxpayers themselves will not ask about the need to contain this octopus. I do not think that Trump will give Putin any guarantees regarding the further not expansion of the bloc and the reduction in the concentration of NATO troops at the borders of Russia. For such guarantees, Trump will demand from Russia deliberately impracticable conditions, say, returning Crimea to Ukraine, leaving Syria or, at worst, giving the Kuril Islands to the Japanese. Of course, it is clear that there will be certain deals in some areas, but I do not think that they will become an occasion to talk about some kind of warming, much less about normalizing relations. Not for that Trump came to power in order to lose ground, but rather, to return the lost and strengthen existing ones. I think the relations that are not at all simple and definitely far from friendly are coming.
  15. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 19 November 2016 18: 24
    +1
    According to Trump, if other countries of the military bloc want to increase their own security level, then this should be ensured by their taxpayers, but not American ones.

    This is something from the opera "The End of Cookies for NATO". But in reality, social problems have accumulated in the United States during the time of sole hegemony, and now we have to take more into account the opinion of ordinary citizens of the country. And even the printing press no longer rescues the situation, but makes it worse! We need money, and all at once! Let's see how the new rulers of the United States will steer the budget! And relations will not drastically improve, and it cannot happen so quickly, the people in charge of the sga must mature for this. And the condition for ripening m. only successes in the economies of other countries, especially Russia and China! hi
  16. Altona
    Altona 19 November 2016 20: 37
    +2


    A bit of humor to you in the comments ... laughing