Military Review

The UN supported the Russian initiative to combat the glorification of Nazism

62
The draft resolution “on the elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance, as well as against the glorification of Nazism” proposed by the Russian permanent mission was approved and accepted for consideration in the UN Security Council, reports RIA News.


The UN supported the Russian initiative to combat the glorification of Nazism


The document was approved by the Third Committee of the General Assembly. 131 voted in favor of the country, three (USA, Ukraine and Palau) opposed, 48 countries abstained. More than 50 states acted as co-authors of the resolution.

The Russian Federation draws attention to the "increase in the number of cases of racism throughout the world and a surge in violence motivated by racism and xenophobia, whose victims are ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities."

The document highlights concerns about “glorifying Nazism, including by building monuments and holding public demonstrations to glorify the Nazi past and neo-Nazism.” In this regard, the “unceasing attempts to desecrate or destroy monuments erected in memory of those who fought against Nazism during the Second World War” are also mentioned.

Russia calls on all countries of the world "not to allow the denial of crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during the Second World War."

The draft notes the need to “combat manifestations of religious intolerance, persecution or violence against individuals or entire communities based on ethnic origin or religious beliefs”.
Photos used:
RIA News. Sergey Guneev
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. OLD FART
    OLD FART 18 November 2016 10: 42
    +14
    three (USA, Ukraine and Palau)
    An interesting treshka .. !!!!! Anyway... laughing


    The photo is famous and speaks all for itself ...
    They are still the Donbass on the sounds of the fascist march constantly shelling, drunk scum!
    1. Skeptic Self-Taught
      Skeptic Self-Taught 18 November 2016 10: 43
      +16
      The documentary went to the "bins" ...
      Now the main thing is to play it correctly. And at the same time ask the girl from the ICC - "and what are you going to say now?" Well, at the same time, strain the Balts.
      1. The black
        The black 18 November 2016 10: 51
        +9
        Here is a bunch of fascist lovers - the United States, Ukraine and the unknown to Palau. Even pocket Europeans and Canada abstained
        Of course, how can the United States, which sheltered fascist henchmen after the Second World War, and in Ukraine now, these Bandera henchmen of Hitler are "heroes" in high esteem. It is very regrettable that this is happening in my homeland, therefore Ukraine is now split like never before, explain to the residents Central and South-East, that Bandera and Shukhevych are "heroes", they will not understand it there.
        1. Egoza
          Egoza 18 November 2016 11: 08
          +31
          Quote: Black
          Explain to the residents of the central and South-East that Bandera and Shukhevych are "heroes", they will not understand it there.

          try to explain in schools and kindergartens !!! like that...
          1. Sotskiy
            Sotskiy 18 November 2016 12: 46
            +2
            Quote: Egoza
            try to explain in schools and kindergartens !!! like that...

            Surrealism in a word! good laughing
        2. APASUS
          APASUS 18 November 2016 12: 10
          +11
          Quote: Black
          Here is a bunch of fascist lovers - the United States, Ukraine and the unknown to Palau. Even pocket Europeans and Canada abstained.

          See how the world's chief democrat explained his position:
          The American delegation explained its position by the fact that Russia could use the resolution for political attacks on its neighbors. In addition, diplomats noted that it infringes on freedom of speech. “The United States cannot support this resolution because it is too narrow and politicized because it imposes unacceptable restrictions on the fundamental principles of expression of freedom of opinion,” the Associated Press agency said in a statement to the United States.

          That's so simple, freedom of choice is limited by this decision, that is, can fascism be a state ideology? The decision is beyond democracy.
          Theater of the absurd.
          1. Ulan
            Ulan 18 November 2016 20: 36
            0
            The West has long become a theater of the absurd and resembles the Roman Empire on the eve of its fall. The same debauchery, hypocrisy, moral corruption, a lie.
            And the "barbarians" are on their way.
      2. The black
        The black 18 November 2016 10: 59
        +9
        Quote: Skeptic Self-taught
        The documentary went to the "bins" ...
        Now the main thing is to play it correctly. And at the same time ask the girl from the ICC - "and what are you going to say now?" Well, at the same time, strain the Balts.

        The girl from the ICC is now eating a banana on a palm tree, descended to the ground only 4 times in 14 years, so we will not know her reaction soon laughing
        1. Ulan
          Ulan 18 November 2016 20: 38
          0
          And what’s wrong with her, for the 14 years of the ICC's existence, this girl with her accomplices ate bananas right up to the billiard billiards.
    2. 210ox
      210ox 18 November 2016 10: 46
      +6
      Well, the Shtatniks and Ukrainians are understandable, they are still Nazis .. And Palau? What kind of garbage is that? Well, that’s right, the USA and Ukraine are on a par with Palau ..
      1. jjj
        jjj 18 November 2016 10: 49
        0
        The accepted document does not oblige you to anything
        1. 210ox
          210ox 18 November 2016 10: 52
          +5
          In general, UN decisions (in the light of what is happening in the world) oblige anyone or something to something ... So a bicker ..
        2. Giant thought
          Giant thought 18 November 2016 10: 58
          +3
          And at a meeting of the UN Security Council, Americans will necessarily block the adoption of this document, as they are constantly doing with our initiatives.
          1. Lelek
            Lelek 18 November 2016 11: 45
            +1
            Quote: Thought Giant
            Giant thought


            Yeah. Beauty Samantha stocked up with saliva. One thing pleases that her time is ending. The new one will not be better, but at least the face of the face is more tolerant, seessss.
            1. Ulan
              Ulan 18 November 2016 20: 39
              0
              Yeah ... it’s hard to come up with a more repulsive appearance (and actions) as a representative of a country (any country). Hag, vixen, Baba Yaga.
          2. Monarchist
            Monarchist 18 November 2016 12: 02
            0
            Well ento needless to say.
          3. Retvizan
            Retvizan 18 November 2016 15: 22
            0
            Quote: Giant thought
            And at a meeting of the UN Security Council, Americans will necessarily block the adoption of this document, as they are constantly doing with our initiatives.

            Well, the Russian Federation also blocks the initiative. Each his own interests. All are good..white and no fluffy.
            1. Ulan
              Ulan 18 November 2016 20: 42
              +2
              It depends on what you block. Why is it necessary to block the condemnation of fascism, a state that considers itself democratic?
              What are they afraid of? Yes, the answer is simple, what will go to nuts for their mongrel from the Baltic states and Ukraine.
              And for the sake of such political games need to justify fascism?
        3. udincev
          udincev 18 November 2016 11: 36
          +2
          Quote: jjj
          The accepted document does not oblige you to anything

          Right.
          The document is weakly binding. He shows a lot of things ...
        4. Sotskiy
          Sotskiy 18 November 2016 12: 47
          0
          Quote: jjj
          The accepted document does not oblige you to anything

          The adopted document on the results of the vote says who is "hu".
      2. The black
        The black 18 November 2016 10: 57
        +5
        Quote: 210ox
        Well, Shtatniks and Ukrainians, this is understandable, they are still Nazis .. And Palau?

        And these just did not understand the question laughing
    3. DMB_95
      DMB_95 18 November 2016 10: 51
      +2
      Palau ?! Everything, with such an ally, Ukroina is invulnerable. And who is the third? What a country of three letters .. No, here Palau "decides". laughing
    4. 210ox
      210ox 18 November 2016 10: 55
      +3
      Yeah scum .. We rode, had fun, counted, shed tears ..
      Everything goes to this.
    5. vovanpain
      vovanpain 18 November 2016 11: 04
      +12
      Strange company request The United States and Ukraine understand, this is Palau and what it is. request Although this explains a lot
      During World War II, the islands were occupied by US forces during the Mariana Operation.

      Since 1947, Palau as part of Micronesia - under the control of the United States as a Trust Territory. In the 70s and 80s, there were attempts to consolidate the nuclear-free status of Palau in the constitution, which met US opposition.

      In November 1993, a referendum on Palau approved the status of Palau as "a state freely associated with the United States." Palau proclaimed independence on October 1, 1994
    6. siberalt
      siberalt 18 November 2016 11: 59
      +2
      Oh well. Now, if that, Poroshenko can escape to Palau. bully
    7. Warrior with machine gun
      Warrior with machine gun 18 November 2016 12: 20
      +6
      I wildly apologize for my ignorance, and Palau is what and where?))
    8. gabs
      gabs 18 November 2016 14: 19
      0
      And why are the faces painted over. M razei must know in person.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 18 November 2016 10: 42
    +7
    An unpleasant surprise for Ukraine. Now Bandera will not be a fascist, with the light hand of the State Department and the Kiev junta. And the Holocaust is declared as a holiday for the Jews. Hypocrisy is enough for mattresses and that.
  3. hirurg
    hirurg 18 November 2016 10: 44
    +4
    The document was approved by the Third Committee of the General Assembly. 131 countries voted in favor, three (USA, Ukraine and Palau) opposed, 48 countries abstained.
    Well, what can I say ...
    Significantly! Masks are ripped off, though not all.
    Exceptional are in the minority.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 18 November 2016 11: 35
      +1
      Quote: hirurg
      The document was approved by the Third Committee of the General Assembly. 131 countries voted “for”, three (USA, Ukraine and Palau) opposed, 48 countries abstained

      who voted "for", they just beguiled homophobia with xenophobia ...
    2. Lelek
      Lelek 18 November 2016 11: 50
      0
      Quote: hirurg
      Well, what can I say ...


      What to say, what to say .... So we are waiting for a rich calving (ass-Kesha).
  4. Vend
    Vend 18 November 2016 10: 44
    +4
    That's what trump life-giving does laughing Such funny miracles happen. And I remember earlier they refused such a resolution.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 18 November 2016 10: 49
      +2
      Quote: Wend
      That's what trump life-giving does laughing Such funny miracles happen. And I remember earlier they refused such a resolution.

      These are still flowers, berries in front ... wassat
      1. thinker
        thinker 18 November 2016 11: 47
        0
        Resolutions are adopted annually:
        2014 - UN General Assembly Resolution 69/160
        2015 - UN General Assembly Resolution 70/139
        Unlike decisions adopted by the Security Council that are binding, resolutions of the UN General Assembly have advisory nature.
  5. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 18 November 2016 10: 49
    +5
    three (USA, Ukraine and Palau) opposed
    "Sherochka with Masherochka". Ukraine in this situation looks like a dog with its owner.
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 November 2016 10: 53
    +1
    The UN supported the Russian initiative to combat the glorification of Nazism

    Strange, but some regularity appears - before you condemn something (really not acceptable by the world). it’s just necessary to condemn Russia first and no matter what. Did not notice?
  7. egor-kz
    egor-kz 18 November 2016 11: 00
    +1
    Well, Palau, a superpower nevertheless ... laughing But seriously, the masks are ripped off more than! So openly refuse to support a robust resolution! And well, at least it was only about Nazism, because everything is much wider there. And it seems like the interest of many countries should have been ... Yeah, they survived ...
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 18 November 2016 11: 59
      +1
      Quote: egor-kz
      But seriously, the masks are ripped off more than!


      Yes, the masks have been torn for a long time, but this act of blocking by the United States demonstrates that thousands of Americans who participated in the Second World War against the Nazis KILLED IN VAS that the USA itself is a breeding ground for the spread of Nazism.
      1. Warrior with machine gun
        Warrior with machine gun 18 November 2016 12: 34
        +6
        yeah, the 4th Reich wants to close up the "exceptional"
  8. OLD FART
    OLD FART 18 November 2016 11: 01
    +6
    Kiev needs to be taken, our veterans and fallen soldiers will soon rise and go from the graves ... What an insult this damned whore-shelt-blocking whore inflicts on all of our grandchildren 30 million. Fallen with fascism! I have no words just ..
  9. knyazru
    knyazru 18 November 2016 11: 02
    +3
    It is interesting to see a list of abstentions, more than sure that all of Europe will be there.
  10. Nemo35
    Nemo35 18 November 2016 11: 04
    0
    Quote: jjj
    The accepted document does not oblige you to anything

    But it demonstrates "who is hu".
  11. volodya
    volodya 18 November 2016 11: 05
    +1
    There is nothing to say about Ukraine, and it is so clear that they will refuse! They have power there in the hands of the Nazis!
  12. Masya masya
    Masya masya 18 November 2016 11: 07
    +6
    "Last year, Canada also opposed the document, which this time abstained, like most European countries." - RIA Novosti
    Whose, overslept or what?
  13. erased
    erased 18 November 2016 11: 19
    +4
    What's the point? They adopted a resolution, but no steps were taken to punish countries where Nazism flourishes and is encouraged. The mechanism is not worked out. Russia, of course, can (and should!) Introduce sanctions against these countries. But will it risk?
    - The Baltic states. It seems that Russian state business is leaving these countries. But private remains. And many people buy real estate there, especially representatives of show business. And to punish their own, who seem to be not their own, if they do so, they will not dare. And then suddenly a howl is a violation of private law!
    - Ukraine. Well, if the Russian Federation still sponsors Bandera’s power, it throws gas for free, it doesn’t prevent the business from conducting transactions and supplying everything. up to engines for armored vehicles, what sanctions are there. I don’t know, maybe it’s driving ammunition. Money doesn’t smell, much less someone else’s blood.
    - USA. Hmm ... Well, who dares to impose sanctions against the Yankees for their support of the regimes of Ukraine and the Baltic states? After all, right there you can get a complete lock on private accounts of Russian government officials and the seizure of real estate. And the children study there and in general, the same Motherland! And Russia is the place of work.
    - Other countries that directly or indirectly endorse Nazism in these countries. There are many of them right up to Israel. What, a dozen or two Euro-friends to sanction? And if they blow sponges?
    So it turns out that openly or secretly, but Nazism in the independent scraps of the former Union is supported by many. For this is now one of the forms of pressure on Russia and the preparation of its closest encirclement (geographically) for active actions in the event of the "W" hour. Moreover, explicit Nazism is shown here. And there is one hidden under the guise of "national self-determination" and it flourishes in the Central Asian and Transcaucasian republics - the same remnants of the USSR. There the Russians are in complete ... nirvana.
    All Nazism is aimed against the Russians. Such a feng shui.
  14. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 18 November 2016 11: 19
    +1
    (USA, Ukraine and Palau
    Three countries vs. Antanta bully
  15. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 18 November 2016 11: 22
    +6
    Quote: Thunderbolt
    Palau

    Have you noticed the flag of this mysterious Palau? The colors speak for themselves ... Could this be the cradle of ancient ukrov?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 18 November 2016 11: 31
      +1
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      Have you noticed the flag of this mysterious Palau?

      Is there someone living there?
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 18 November 2016 11: 38
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Is there someone living there?

        Well, it’s not the disembodied spirit at the UN who voted. I suppose that the representative of the Palau people who sent him there.
        P.S. Among palm trees, I noticed a hut --- definitely someone is bully
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 18 November 2016 11: 59
          +1
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Well, it’s not the disembodied spirit in the UN who voted.

          It is logical
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          .I suppose that the representative of the Palau people who sent him there.

          ?
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Among the palm trees I noticed a hut-

          Aaaaaaaaaaa, I understand everything, there are no questions. A large friendly family of Papua laughing
          1. Thunderbolt
            Thunderbolt 18 November 2016 12: 01
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            .Large friendly family of Papua
            and mamua yes .
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 18 November 2016 13: 31
              0
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              and mamua

              Papua married Mamua - I understand. Advice and love
  16. byxarik1
    byxarik1 18 November 2016 11: 29
    +2
    terrorism no longer rolls, burned, will use fascism to promote their democracy
  17. uskrabut
    uskrabut 18 November 2016 11: 42
    +1
    A document is good. But it would not hurt to put the Natsiks into an erotic pose in practice, so that everyone can see - this is punishable
  18. protoss
    protoss 18 November 2016 11: 49
    0
    what stupid things they do in the united nations!
    You can also consider the resolution against hunger, domestic violence, pediculosis and flat feet. I think everyone will be in favor.
    1. OLD FART
      OLD FART 18 November 2016 12: 10
      0
      Quote: protoss
      what stupid things they do in the united nations!
      You can also consider the resolution against hunger, domestic violence, pediculosis and flat feet. I think everyone will be in favor.

      Already there, our Churkin is there to death ... This chicken coop, shugs to the best of its abilities and capabilities ..)))

      Hold on to Vitali! Russia is with you ..!
  19. jovanni
    jovanni 18 November 2016 12: 02
    +1
    (USA, Ukraine and Palau) opposed ...

    Well, with these two it’s clear, but Palau is Palau! How not ashamed to stand up for the abomination! Who could have expected from Palau ... By the way, where is it?
  20. Mikhail Polnikov
    Mikhail Polnikov 18 November 2016 12: 03
    0
    Quote: protoss
    what stupid things they do in the united nations!
    You can also consider the resolution against hunger, domestic violence, pediculosis and flat feet. I think everyone will be in favor.

    If these resolutions come from Russia (and judging by some legislative acts no one except the State Duma is capable of such a flight of thought), then the majority of UN member states will be against it.
  21. Skif2016
    Skif2016 18 November 2016 12: 16
    0
    The very logical behavior of the United States and Ukraine, as well as abstentions. Why should they substitute themselves after their actions in the Middle East and Africa, and also why should they tie their hands in the future
  22. Monarchist
    Monarchist 18 November 2016 12: 31
    +2
    Now I checked Vika: I am burning an archipelago in Oceania, the population is almost 20 thousand. This is from the opera: ".... where there are many wild monkeys." And intelligence seems to be the same
  23. Retvizan
    Retvizan 18 November 2016 15: 37
    +1
    Quote: Giant thought
    And at a meeting of the UN Security Council, Americans will necessarily block the adoption of this document, as they are constantly doing with our initiatives.

    Well, the Russian Federation also blocks the initiative. Each his own interests. All are good .. there is no white and fluffy. To see persons of heroes like Milchakov, what can I say. And theirs are clear to them.
    But diplomatically the refusal is quite motivated.
    According to the American and Ukrainian sides, this document violates freedom of speech, as well as the fact that Russia can use it for political pressure on its neighbors.
    US Deputy Representative to the Economic and Social Council Stephanie Amadeo said the resolution is "too narrow a scope" and is "politicized."
    “It imposes unacceptable restrictions on the fundamental principles of free speech expression. Therefore, the United States cannot support it,” Amadeo said.
    As a reminder, the Russian resolution entitled "Combating the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to the escalation of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance" was approved by the UN Human Rights Committee on Friday with 131 votes in favor. ", three" against "with 48 abstentions. Ukraine, the United States and Palau voted against its adoption.
    It is worth noting that, unlike UN Security Council resolutions, resolutions in committees of the General Assembly are not considered legally binding.
    The position of the United States is easy to understand - their freedom of speech and opinion is the pinnacle of democracy (whatever it may be), and the methods of prohibition will not work. They are zealous "democratizers". Before Ukraine, she just proceeded from 2 things, the first is that this is the proposal of the Russian Federation (the Russian Federation also blocked the initiatives of Ukraine). And the second is that you can really act as you please, blaming everything that somehow falls into this category. You can even accuse the Russian Federation of neo-Nazism (and indeed anyone) and promote hysteria. It is even easier to do this with Ukraine.
    But the main thing is solidarity with the US position. Here they licked too deeply. Okay, there is Palau ... they did not participate in the struggle against Nazism and fascism. And Ukraine (USSR and the USSR) participated.
    In general, summarizing, anyway, the document has no legal force. Yes, and in the current information war, nothing will stop calling each other.
  24. Suhow
    Suhow 18 November 2016 20: 52
    0
    Oce zrada, though the hazyin is also against ... Strange, there are also many victims (USA) ....
  25. The comment was deleted.