Military Review

Bitter surprise for Kiev

137
RќR ° F "RμRЅR ° SЃSЃR RјR ° ± P" RμRμ RћRћRќ PI RіRѕSЂRѕRґRμ RќSЊSЋ-P ™ RѕSЂRєRμ SЃR "‡ SѓS Röhr" RѕSЃSЊ S,Rѕ C ‡ RμRіRѕ RљRoRμRІ RЅRμ R¶RґR ° F "Ryo R¶RґR ° C, СЊ РЅРµ РјРѕРі. P · RμR SѓR "SЊS,R ° S,S <RїSЂRѕS € RμRґS € RμRіRѕ RіRѕR" RѕSЃRѕRІR ° RЅRoSЏ RїRѕ SЂRμR · RѕR "SЋS † RoRo of the PS SЃRoS,SѓR ° C † RoRo PI RљSЂS <RјSѓ RѕRєR ° R · R ° R »РёСЃСЊ весьмР° неприятны РјРё РґР »СЏ РЈРєСЂР ° РёРЅС‹. P 'RћRћRќ RμSЃR "Ryo Ryo RіSЂSЏRЅSѓR" P ° RЅRμ In "RєSЂS <RјSЃRєR SЏ RІRμSЃRЅR ° ° The" S,Rѕ RЅR SЃS,R ° ° P "of the PS RμS' RїSЂRμRґRІRμSЃS,RoRμ: P · P ° The" RєSЂS < РјРЅР ° С € В »РѕС‚РґР ° Р» Рѕ РіРѕР »РѕСЃР ° рРРРРРР» СЊС € Рµ РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° рств, С ‡ ем РІ РёСЃС‚РсСЂРС РРСРРРРРРРРСРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРјРІРјРІРІРІРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР »Р »Р »Р »РРРРР »Р »Р »Р »Р »РРРРРР »Р »Р »РРРРРРР »Р »Р »РРРРРРРР »Р »РРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР




Ukraine was able to achieve the adoption of a resolution in the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly, which condemned the human rights situation in Crimea. 73 states voted for this document. Among them are the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the entire EU. At the same time, twenty-three countries spoke out against the resolution, including Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Armenia, China, Venezuela, North Korea, India, Iran, Serbia, Syria. More 76 states abstained; among the latter are Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Finally, the 21 country did not participate in the voting.

As the TASS, RґRѕRєSѓRјRμRЅS, RѕSЃSѓRґRoR "In" SѓS ‰ RμRјR "RμRЅRoSЏ RїSЂR PI ° C ‡ RμR" RѕRІRμRєR °, RґRoSЃRєSЂRoRјRoRЅR ° C † RoRѕRЅRЅS <Rμ RјRμSЂS <Ryo RїSЂR ° RєS,RoRєSѓ PI RѕS,RЅRѕS € RμRЅRoRo R¶RoS,RμR "RμR No. RљСЂС ‹РјР ° В». Р 'СЃРїРёСЃРѕРє СѓС ‰ емР»С'РЅРЅС‹ С РР Р °Р РРїРСРР Р РР Рё Рё РЂСЂС ‹РјСЃРєРёРµ С ВР С СРР С СРС, СѓРєСЂР ° РёРЅР С РР РР РР РР РР РР РєРСР °Р °Р °РР »Р »Р »R »R »R »R »R »R »R »RRRR РежР° С ‰ РёРµ In “Рє РґСЂСѓРіРёРј этнРОС ‡ еским Рё рел РёРіРёРѕР · РЅС ‹Рј РіСЂСѓРїРїР ° РјВ». P 'S,RμRєSЃS,Rμ SЃRѕRґRμSЂR¶RoS,SЃSЏ RїSЂRoR · C <R PI Rє RѕSЃSЃRoRo: RѕR ± ‡ RμSЃRїRμS RoS,SЊ RЅR ° RїRѕR "SѓRѕSЃS,SЂRѕRІ In" RЅR ° RґR "RμR¶R ° C ‰ RoR№ Ryo R ± РµѓµЅРРРРРРРРРРРµµµµРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР ° ° ° ° С С С С РїСЂР ° РІ С ‡ еловекР° В».

PC, P ° P¶Rµ реР· РѕР »СЋС † RёSЏ PїРѕС, реР± РѕРІР ° Р» Р ° неР· Р ° мевЀЀеееееееееееелР»РРРР№РССРРРРРРРЅС ‹РїРµРЅРіРµРµРµ SЃSѓRґRѕRј P RѕSЃSЃRoRo SЂRμS € RμRЅRoSЏ of the PS · RїSЂRoR RЅR RЅRoRo RѕR ° C ± ‰ RμSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅRѕR№ RѕSЂRіR RЅRoR · ° F ° C † RoRo In "RњRμRґR¶R" RoSЃ RєSЂS <RјSЃRєRѕ-S,R ° S,R ° SЂSЃRєRѕRіRѕ RЅR ° СЂРѕРґР ° В »СЌРєСЃС‚ремРОстской.

RџRѕ SЃR "RѕRІR ° Rј RґRoSЂRμRєS,RѕSЂR ° F" RμRїR SЂS,R ° ° ° RјRμRЅS,R RїRѕ RіSѓRјR ° RЅRoS,R ° SЂRЅRѕRјSѓ SЃRѕS,SЂSѓRґRЅRoS ‡ RμSЃS,RІSѓ Ryo RїSЂR ° RІR Rј ° C ‡ RμR "RѕRІRμRєR ° RњR R ђ ° ° Р Р Р Р ¶RμRЅRoRμRј RґRμR "PI RљSЂS <RјSѓ, RЅRo SЃ RјRЅRμRЅRoRμRј Ryo RoRЅS,RμSЂRμSЃR ° RјRo R¶RoS,RμR" RμR№ SЌS,RѕRіRѕ RїRѕR "SѓRѕSЃS,SЂRѕRІR ° B".

However, it should be noted, and a positive fact of voting: in the 2016 year, the Russian position on Crimea was supported by much more states than in the 2014 year.

RџRѕRєR ° R · R ° S,RμR "SЊRЅS <Rј SЃS,R ° F" Ryo RoS,RѕRіRo RіRѕR "RѕSЃRѕRІR ° RЅRoSЏ RїR SЂS,RЅS'SЂRѕRІ ° F R¤ RїRѕ P'P P RљRЎ. Р • СЃР »РЁ РІ 2014 РіРѕРґСѓ РІСЃРµ РѕРЅРё РІРѕР · держР° Р» РОСЃСЊ, то СЃРµР№С Р Р ° СЃ три РёР · С Ð РСРССС С СРР С СРР С С РРСР С СРР СРР Р РР ° Р Р Р °С Р Р РС Р Р °С Ѓ РµС Ѓ РС Њ С С Ѓ РС Ñ С СРР СРР СРР С СРР С Р Р РеѸаР° Р Р РС С РЊС ё Р№, Р РЅРґРёСЏ, ЮАР) РїСЂРѕРіРѕР »РѕСЃРѕРІР ° Р» Рё СЃРѕР »РёРґР ° СЂРЅРѕ СЃ РњРѕСЃРєРІРѕР№, РССРРРРСС Р ° РµС Kommersant. Р'РѕР · держР° Р »Р ° СЃСЊ РѕРґРЅР ° Р'СЂР ° Р · РёР» РёСЏ.

Р Р · 47 РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° рств Р§С'СЂРЅРСРСРСРРРРРРРђР ±С ±Р ±С ±Р СР »РЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊР¶РѕРРРѕРѕР№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№Р РР РР РР °Р °Р °Р ·Р ·РР РР РР РРёРёРРРРР °Р °Р °Р№Р№Р№Р№Р№РРР№Р№Р№Р№Р№РРРСРРР °Р °Р ·РР РРR РR РRRRRRRRRRRRRRRPRRPRRP RRPPRRRRPRRPRPPRPPRPPRPPRPPRPPRPRPRRPRRP † RES. R & D, R & D; »Р ° РІРё, СьеррР° -Р› еоне).

Р Р · всех Р ° Р · РёР ° тских РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° рств РІ РїРѕРґРґРСжЌЂжкСРреР· РѕР »СЋС † РёРЁ РІР ° СѓРґРѕРІСЃРєР ° СЏ РђСЂР ° РІРЁСЏ, РљР ° тР° СЂ, Р ™ емен, Р'утР° РЅ Рё РЇРїСѕРСРёСЏ СР РўСѓСЂС † ией.

РќР ° РёР ± РсР »РµРµ Р ± Р» Р ° гожелР° СРЂел СЊРЅРѕ Рє Р РѕСРСРРРРРРРєРєР ° Рє РЁ РІ 2014-Рј, РїСРРРРРРРРРСРРРРРРРРРРРРРСРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРСРРРРР XNUMX-Рј, РїСРРРРРРРРРРСРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРR Южной Америки: РІ Рї РРРРРРРРRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMRM: RI RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. · тР° РєРёС… Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ три СЃС, СЂР ° РЅС ‹: Перу, РљРѕР» СѓРјР ± РёСЏ, Чили).

R'RμSЃSЊRјR ° RЅRμRґRѕRІRѕR "RμRЅ RљRoRμRІ SЂR SЃRєR °" ° F RґRѕRј RіRѕR "RѕSЃRѕRІ SЃS,SЂR ° RЎRќR of the PS": RїSЏS,SЊ SЃS,SЂR ± ° C of the PS F <RІS € RμRіRѕ RЎRЎRЎR RїSЂRѕRіRѕR "RѕSЃRѕRІR ° F" in Ryo "противВ". RS Ryo РІРѕР · держР° тьССЃСЏ. Р РРоосстсоветскРОС… респуР± Р »РёРє РІРѕР · РержР° Р» РЁСЃСЊ толькРС РљС РўСѓСЂРєРјРµРЅРёСЏ РЁ РђР · ерР± Р ° йджР° РЅ РЅРµ РіРѕР »РѕСЃРѕРІР ° Р» РЁР (РІ РїСЂРѕС € Р »С R РСРРРР РРРРРРРРРРРРРРСРСР Р Р СРРРРРРРРРРР Р РРЅРµR °R °R °RёRёRёRёRёRЏR ·R ·R ·R ·R ·RRRRRRRёRёRёRёRÖRRёRRёRёRRRRRRRRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅRЅ ( RLS † RёSЋ RЈRєSЂR ° RÖRЅC ‹). Среди поддержР° РІС € РЁС… реР· РѕР »СЋС † РёСЋ — РњРѕР »РґР ° РІРёСЏ, Р“ СЂСѓР · РёСЏ РёРЈРЂСЂРРРРРРРРРРРРРРСРРСР, Р “СЂСѓР · РёСЏ РёРЈРЂСЂРРРРРРРРРРРРРР РСРР, Р“ СЂСѓР · РёСЏ РёРЈРЂСРРРРРРРРРРРРРР РРЏСР, Р “СЂСѓР · РёСЏ РёРЈРЂСЂРРРРРРРРРРРРРРСРРСРР, Р“ СЂСѓР · РёСЏ РёРЈРЂСЂРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРСРЏР ”

Irina Gerashchenko, the first deputy chairman of the Verkhovna Rada, authorized by the President of Ukraine on the issues of settlement in the Donbass and a member of the Ukrainian delegation, at the talks in Minsk, declared the “knife” that brotherly Belarus allegedly drove back into Ukraine.

“As for the position of Belarus, we regard it as a knife in the back,” she cites her words. "Independent newspaper". РџРѕ РµС 'мнению, СЂСѓСЃСЃРєРёРµ РјРѕРіСѓС, СЃРЃРѕСЂРѕ вторгнууьс РІ РњРёРёСЃРє. RџRѕSЌC‚RѕRјSѓ R ± PµR РRѕSЂSѓSЃR ° RјSЃR »RµRґSѓRµS Р PѕSСCRЃRЅR РR ·R ЊRЊRРRЅRЅRРRРRРRРRРRРRРRРRРR ·RѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓR ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·RѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRРRРRРRРRРRРRѓRѓRѓRРRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓRѓR ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R ·R РRРR ·RРRРR , of the PS SЃR "RμRґSѓSЋS RoRј P ‰ ± SѓRґRμS, RњRoRЅSЃRє, RμSЃR" Ryo SЃRμRіRѕRґRЅSЏ RљRoRμRІ RЅRμ RѕS,SЃS,RѕRoS, RЅRμR · ° F RІRoSЃRoRјRѕSЃS,SЊV ".

RљSЂRoS,RoRєR ° F RіRѕSЃRїRѕR¶Ro "RμSЂR ° C ‰ RμRЅRєRѕ RєRѕSЃRЅSѓR" P ° SЃSЊ Ryo RґSЂSѓRіRoS ... SѓS ‡ R ° SЃS,RЅRoRєRѕRІ RЎRќR ": In" RњS <SѓRІR R¶R ° ° ° RμRј RїSЂR RІRѕ RђSЂRјRμRЅRoRo Ryo RљR ° Р · Р ° С… стР° РЅР ° РЅР ° РЁС… РѕСЃРѕР ± С ‹Рµ РІР · Р ° РёРјРѕРѕССтР€РС € еннRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRrRR ° ем. РќРѕ Рё РЅР ° С € РЁРґСЂСѓР · СЊСЏ РІ РґСЂСѓР¶РµСЃС‚РІРµРЅРЅС ‹С РРР ° РРРРРР Р Р С С… стР° РЅРµ Рё АрменRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP ‡ S,Rѕ SЃRμRіRѕRґRЅSЏ RЈRєSЂR ° RoRЅR °, SѓRєSЂR ° RoRЅSЃRєRoR№ RЅR ° SЂRѕRґ Ryo SѓRєSЂR RoRЅSЃRєR ° ° ° F SЏ SЂRјRoSЏ RІRѕSЋSЋS, RЅRμ S,RѕR "SЊRєRѕ F · F ° C ° RЅR € Sѓ RЅRμR · ° F RІRoSЃRoRјRѕSЃS,SЊ . RJV

PRP RџRѕ RјRЅRμRЅRoSЋ RЅRμRєRѕS,RѕSЂS <C ... Röhr · RЅRoS ... RЅR RїRμSЂRμRјRμRЅSѓ RЅR ° ° ° SЃS,SЂRѕRμRЅRoR№ SЂSЏRґR SЃS,SЂR ° of the PS RїRѕRІR "RoSЏR" P ° RѕRїRμSЂR ° C † RoSЏ P RѕSЃSЃRoRo PI RЎRoSЂRoRo.

In the “Red Crescent”, the Red Cross † RyoSЏ RyuRoRyoRyoRyoV ", — С РРєР ° Р · Р ° Р " "Free Press" Leading expert at the Center for Military-Political Research MGIMO, Doctor of Political Sciences Mikhail Alexandrov.

According to him, Russia has demonstrated military power, as well as the ability to respond to the American challenge. And now everyone saw that Moscow is capable of both standing up for itself and taking under the protection of its allies.

“The last point is extremely important. For example, the ex-president of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev massively handed over the allies, and the ex-president of the Russian Federation Boris Yeltsin did not particularly defend them. As a result, a situation arose in which Russia could not be relied upon. And if so, why support her in the UN? ”


Today, the opinion about Russia is changing: this can be seen from the voting results at the General Assembly. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan feel “more confident”, the expert believes. They demonstrate that they are confident in the assistance of the Russian Federation if Washington begins to put pressure on them.

The expert also noted the disappointment of a number of Middle Eastern countries with the US policy. This is also evident from the voting results. In the list of disappointed Mikhail Alexandrov named Qatar and Bahrain, which are associated with the situation in Syria and are afraid of Iran. Perhaps now they want to negotiate with Russia in case “Washington leaves them.”

The expert makes the following conclusion: Moscow and further should show willpower and determination, including with regard to Ukraine. The current vote showed: because of the Ukrainian conflict, Moscow was not at all in international isolation. The total number of countries that voted against the resolution (23) and abstained (76) is half the UN members!

Russia is taken seriously in the world only when it is a strong state. And so it was in the Soviet era.

We can assume, we add that over time, the Crimean issue in the international community will be resolved by “overflowing” the votes of the UN members. With regard to future Ukrainian resolutions, the voices of countries will gradually move from “for” to “abstain” and from “abstain” to “against.” In the end, Kiev is waiting for complete disappointment. For Moscow can only “give back” the Crimea, only some specific heads in Kiev can. Moscow will not give up, and all UN members have long understood this. In principle, this is understood in Kiev. But they still believe in the "help" of the West. Well, the greater the disappointment!

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
137 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. EvilLion
    EvilLion 18 November 2016 08: 54
    +18
    In total, 99 was clearly not supported or ignored. Download further.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 18 November 2016 08: 59
      +18
      "In vain is the old woman waiting for her son home ..." Moreover, he never was her son!
      1. OLD FART
        OLD FART 18 November 2016 09: 06
        +35
        This is what oppresses this in the Crimea ...? bully

        The last hope to get the Russians .. Look how grabbed! wink
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 18 November 2016 10: 27
          +17
          Quote: STARPER
          This is what oppresses this in the Crimea ...? bully

          The last hope to get the Russians .. Look how grabbed! wink

          So our best friend Israel voted "FOR" the resolution on the ownership of Crimea by Ukraine, that is, against Russia.
          That once again speaks of Tel Aviv's support for the Poroshenko (Valtsman) regime
          Israel supported the UN resolution on the Crimea to Ukraine
          The UN resolution unequivocally states that this international organization "condemns the temporary occupation by the Russian Federation of a part of the territory of Ukraine - the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol (hereinafter Crimea) - and confirms the non-recognition of its annexation."

          The delegation of Israel voted in favor of a resolution on the Ukrainian status of Crimea, along with representatives of the United States, Canada, as well as EU countries.
          http://cursorinfo.co.il/news/novosti1/2016/11/16/
          izrail-podderzhal-rezolyuciyu-oon-o-prinadlezhnos
          ti-krima-ukraine /
          1. OLD FART
            OLD FART 18 November 2016 10: 39
            +18
            That's right Quilted jacket, you need to mature at the root ... And then some "comrades" are straight nightingales poured about "love for Russia", and they themselves secretly shit constantly!
            1. Volzhanin
              Volzhanin 19 November 2016 07: 26
              +4
              So that’s why they are Jews. smile
          2. 34 region
            34 region 18 November 2016 11: 00
            +19
            10.27. Padded jacket! ABOUT! And what is it against? Oh how much they squeezed out their territories! And without referenda! If Crimea is the Territory of Ukraine, then how many wars did Ukraine wage for it and from whom did it repel it? Here recently, the Israelis seemed to have sworn friendship, trust and mutual assistance to Putin. What is it then? If you are assured of friendship and mutual understanding, then they sharpen an ax?
            1. neoshef
              neoshef 18 November 2016 11: 33
              +14
              Moreover, they did come to Putin and asked to move to Russia from Europe. So let them now move to Ukraine, once they vote for them.
            2. gg.na
              gg.na 18 November 2016 13: 16
              +7
              Quote: Region 34
              And what is it against? Oh how much they squeezed out their territories! And without referenda!

              That's why they are against it! If they are FOR then you will have to return the squeezed territories bully and this oh how not No. I want to!!! Here it’s only worth recognizing and voting FOR how the consequences will not be long in coming. Stsykotno wassat but laughing !!!
          3. Wiskar
            Wiskar 18 November 2016 12: 12
            +2
            Quote: quilted jacket
            So our best friend Israel voted "FOR" the resolution on the ownership of Crimea by Ukraine, that is, against Russia.


            Russia considers Israel to be an occupier and supports all anti-Israeli resolutions ..

            Although it is worth noting that UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 is a document adopted on March 27, 2014 as a result of open voting at the 80th plenary meeting of the 68th session of the UN General Assembly. According to the resolution, the UN General Assembly confirms the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine in its internationally recognized borders and does not recognize the legality of any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the status of the city of Sevastopol

            Israel did not take part in the vote.




            Quote: quilted jacket
            That once again speaks of Tel Aviv's support for the Poroshenko (Valtsman) regime


            Stop writing that Poroshenko Waltzman - that’s why your lies look even worse than your usual lies.

            1. Ivan Bagnyuk
              Ivan Bagnyuk 18 November 2016 12: 53
              +4
              And Yake Tse lies? you yourself are a nonsense
              1. Wiskar
                Wiskar 18 November 2016 13: 08
                0
                http://smi2.mirtesen.ru/blog/43316634575/Vse-taki
                % 20-Poroshenko, -a-ne-Valtsman ...

                study.
                1. Igool
                  Igool 18 November 2016 15: 56
                  +3
                  Wiskar I advise you to study and clarify
                  All the same, Valtsman, not Poroshenko:
                  http://www.zrd.spb.ru/letter/2014/letter_0064.htm
            2. Camel
              Camel 18 November 2016 20: 18
              +6
              According to the resolution, the UN General Assembly confirms the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine in its internationally recognized borders and does not recognize the legality of any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the status of the city of Sevastopol

              What internationally accepted borders can we talk about? Especially in the UN, if there is no officially demarcated border? Legally, Ukraine is part of the USSR, and Russia, as the sole assignee of the USSR.
          4. Arameev
            Arameev 18 November 2016 15: 44
            +1
            Quote: quilted jacket

            Israel voted "FOR" the resolution on the ownership of Crimea by Ukraine, that is, against Russia.

            what did you want? friendship is mutual concept. and in politics it was ..... we tried to start from a new sheet: in March 2014, when adopting a resolution on the territorial integrity of Ukraine and the Crimean referendum, despite the strongest outside pressure, we simply did not vote! the problem of Crimea is an internal problem of a large Russian state. and what ?! What did we get in return? in response, Russia does not even recognize the connection of Jerusalem with our history (UNESCO resolution a month ago), not to mention some territories. Israel is a very small country in a hostile environment like Russia (although the country is large, but there is enough hostility along the borders). seem to have to understand each other. but ... we also hate your continuous vote for anti-Israeli resolutions
            like gritsa "what is hello is the answer" eh! I love Russian folk wisdom!
            1. Alnair
              Alnair 18 November 2016 23: 59
              +2
              Because "they did not vote" is not support yet. When you vote for the whole world in our favor, then we will not only recognize Jerusalem, but bombs with white phosphorus will immediately become Palestinian. )))
            2. ava09
              ava09 20 November 2016 15: 38
              0
              For some reason I am not sure that the lands seized from the Palestinians belong to the state "Israel". Just like the Zionists from the outskirts of Russia, what is today called "Ukraine" ...
          5. 1536
            1536 18 November 2016 17: 08
            +5
            An urgent need to recognize de jure the Palestinian state. Stop lingering with the boor.
          6. Douel
            Douel 18 November 2016 21: 26
            +3
            I will explain why they supported Ukraine. Our Russia voted in UNESCO to recognize the Temple Mount in Israel for Muslims. Moreover, having thrown Israel twice in this matter.
          7. nov_tech.vrn
            nov_tech.vrn 20 November 2016 15: 27
            0
            and not friend and not enemy, and so, these have their own interests, they do not trust themselves, it will be profitable to buy a pet, or sell, but also profitable
        2. GSH-18
          GSH-18 18 November 2016 11: 23
          +7
          Quote: STARPER
          This is what oppresses this in the Crimea ...?

          Look at this bunch of shriveled guano! And does it think that it represents the entire Crimean Tatar people ??? fool
          1. Ivan Bagnyuk
            Ivan Bagnyuk 18 November 2016 12: 58
            +5
            Well, cho, she’s at least 700%. Armenia, is 100% protected.
        3. ava09
          ava09 20 November 2016 15: 34
          0
          Symbolic Shot - 5+
      2. GSH-18
        GSH-18 18 November 2016 11: 11
        +6
        PC, P ° P¶Rµ реР· РѕР »СЋС † RёSЏ PїРѕС, реР± РѕРІР ° Р» Р ° неР· Р ° мевЀЀеееееееееееелР»РРРР№РССРРРРРРРЅС ‹РїРµРЅРіРµРµРµ SЃSѓRґRѕRј P RѕSЃSЃRoRo SЂRμS € RμRЅRoSЏ of the PS · RїSЂRoR RЅR RЅRoRo RѕR ° C ± ‰ RμSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅRѕR№ RѕSЂRіR RЅRoR · ° F ° C † RoRo In "RњRμRґR¶R" RoSЃ RєSЂS <RјSЃRєRѕ-S,R ° S,R ° SЂSЃRєRѕRіRѕ RЅR ° СЂРѕРґР ° В »СЌРєСЃС‚ремРОстской.

        Attraction obscurantism.
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 18 November 2016 11: 01
      +7
      If the “Crimean spring” didn’t break out at the UN, its harbinger has come: more states have voted for the “Crimean spring” than in the historical 2014.

      Staging castrolegol bydlobauinov cancer in action! I applaud while standing. good
      1. Ivan Bagnyuk
        Ivan Bagnyuk 18 November 2016 13: 02
        +3
        PIDTRY !!!!!
    3. GSH-18
      GSH-18 18 November 2016 11: 08
      +4
      According to TASS, the document condemned "violations of human rights, discriminatory measures and practices against residents of the Crimea."

      I have a strong feeling that this UN is in parallel reality. So I want to say according to Lavrov, DB fool
      1. Wiskar
        Wiskar 18 November 2016 12: 21
        +1
        It's just that you are experiencing about the same thing that Russia and the West have done and are doing in relation to Israel.

        It’s just that now you feel the venality of the UN, bias and double standards. Moreover, the same Russia as the United States and others.

        Just before that, you didn’t care because it didn’t concern you. And then you suddenly realized the reality - the countries and the UN itself do not care about justice. The same Russia spat on justice, as did the United States. It’s just that when Russia was in a good position and there was no good reason, they climbed little to it. And now sanctions, Crimea, the International Criminal Court, which regarded the events of 2014 in Crimea as an armed conflict and called Russia an occupier.

        Now you can see in all its glory bias, double standards and commitment. Only now is this in relation to Russia. Maybe something in your head will change and you will overestimate the approach of Russia, when it also acts biased, using double standards in relation to others.
        1. Uncle Murzik
          Uncle Murzik 18 November 2016 15: 48
          +5
          Wiskar our Jewish friend from France let Israel be happy from Iran, do not worry! laughing
    4. GSH-18
      GSH-18 18 November 2016 11: 13
      +3
      The text calls on Russia: to provide the peninsula with "appropriate and unhindered access by international human rights monitoring missions."

      Do they really think we are idiots? fool
      1. Ivan Bagnyuk
        Ivan Bagnyuk 18 November 2016 13: 07
        +1
        And a certain X ...........! they get in the way, let her at least crawl with all the United Nations!
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 18 November 2016 13: 10
      +3
      Judging by the vote, the world is polarized. And if you look at the population, then Russia is in the majority.
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 18 November 2016 13: 25
        +1
        Quote: siberalt
        And if you look at the population, then ...

        - "votes" vote, not population request

    6. AUL
      AUL 18 November 2016 19: 56
      +1
      Of all the Asian states, only six supported the resolution: Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Yemen, Bhutan, and Japan with Turkey.

      Author, teach geography! When did Turkey manage to become an Asian state?
      1. Alnair
        Alnair 19 November 2016 00: 02
        +3
        And when did she become European? )))
        1. AUL
          AUL 19 November 2016 17: 13
          0
          But my whole life was! You shouldn’t have run away from geography at school!
  2. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 18 November 2016 08: 55
    +12
    Gradually, people begin to understand what's what, over time, Ukraine will cease to be perceived as an adequate state.
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 18 November 2016 09: 51
      +17
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Gradually, people begin to understand what's what, over time, Ukraine will cease to be perceived as an adequate state.

      After the Maidan, no one considers Ukraine an adequate state, but simply play this card blindly as pressure on the Russian Federation.
      1. NIKNN
        NIKNN 18 November 2016 10: 26
        +4
        Quote: NEXUS
        After the Maidan, no one considers Ukraine an adequate state, but simply play this card blindly as pressure on the Russian Federation.

        +++++++++++
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 18 November 2016 11: 04
      +4
      Quote: Spartanez300
      Gradually, people begin to understand what's what, over time, Ukraine will cease to be perceived as an adequate state.

      The word "adequate" in your commentary is superfluous in my opinion.
    3. 34 region
      34 region 18 November 2016 11: 04
      +6
      08.55. 300 Spartans! The state is when independence. And what is the independence of the outskirts? Well, if only independence from the mind. I'm afraid this is not the name of the country, but of the territory. hi And the name is very symbolic. Outskirts of the West or Russia? Or maybe the edge of the mind?
  3. Alex_Rarog
    Alex_Rarog 18 November 2016 08: 56
    +6
    It seems that soon everyone will get tired of coclandia) they are already almost openly sending it) soon they will generally just ignore it!
  4. izya top
    izya top 18 November 2016 08: 56
    +7
    however, the Yankees and horses against the resolution banning the justification of Nazism
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 18 November 2016 09: 33
      +2
      Quote: izya top
      however, the yankees and horses are opposed to a resolution on ban justifications nazism

      О the fight against heroization.
      USA and Ukraine - some cover and harbor the Nazis, others produce. Probably the time will come when the UN will vote on the issue of holding an international trial over Obama and Poroshenko. Perhaps there will be abstentions, but probably there will be no one "against".
      1. BecmepH
        BecmepH 18 November 2016 10: 32
        +2
        on the international trial of Obama and Poroshenko. Perhaps there will be abstentions, but probably there will be no one "against".
        I would like your optimism, zema ...
  5. inkass_98
    inkass_98 18 November 2016 08: 57
    +6
    All these polls and decisions are worth nothing, only UNSC resolutions are decisive.
    Sooner rejoice a large number of abstentions in the vote on the Crimea. Now, if the majority did not abstain, but it would be actively opposed, then yes, we can speak about a turning point in relation to Russia and in general in world trends to change the vector from a unipolar world to a multi-polar.
    As a result, most countries simply did not want to spoil their relations with the locomotives of the Western world, and at the same time they made a kind of curtsey to Russia in the style of Medvedik "no money, but you hold on."
    And only VNA this ordinary event caused hysteria.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 18 November 2016 11: 12
      +3
      08.57. Collection 98! It's good to be brave when you are strong and independent! Or when power is behind you. You can certainly show character. De Gaulle and Gaddafi have shown. Others became scared. After all, you can and will pay for the character.
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 19 November 2016 09: 52
        0
        Quote: Region 34
        It's good to be brave when you are strong and independent!

        Yeah, that's how it eats. wink b. Have you ever heard of Tobaccos? A very revealing character, relevant in our turbulent times.
  6. prok
    prok 18 November 2016 08: 58
    +10
    Oleg Chuvakin remarkably "reviewed". Briefly, clearly, understandably. There would be more such "reviews".
  7. vkfriendly
    vkfriendly 18 November 2016 09: 01
    +3
    Everyone understands perfectly well that Ukraine will not see Crimea as its own ears, and all this is just demagogy and window dressing on the part of "territory_404", the bandit government is trying to seem significant and important. All their statehood rests only on the shoulder of the states, I think not long remains.
    1. Tula gingerbread
      Tula gingerbread 18 November 2016 10: 28
      +2
      Of course they understand. But even so, they cannot immediately recognize Crimea as Russian. There is US pressure and other reasons. Therefore, the author correctly said that the position will change gradually, including because no one wants to lose their face and immediately abandon the position of non-recognition.
      But in general for Ukraine, the voting results are very unpleasant.
      1. 34 region
        34 region 18 November 2016 11: 30
        +3
        10.28. Gingerbread man! The position will change in direct proportion to our opposition to the United States. We will beat the teeth of the United States, they will support us. Will the US beat us in the teeth, will support the United States. After the betrayal of Gorbachev, of course, no one began to support us. So are we. Mutually. Trump, he immediately declared, I will work in the interests of America! Our Putin is modest. Where are Russia's ambitions as a superpower? The more Russia will have the status of a superpower, the more allies we will have. So and only so. Where the Russian flag was hoisted, it should not be lowered there. This is very well understood by the Americans. And where they raised their flag, smoking them from there is very difficult. hi This is the answer and 09.01. Well, what are the nicknames indigestible people invent. Could it be easier?
        1. Camel
          Camel 18 November 2016 20: 58
          +1
          34 region:
          Trump, he immediately declared, I will work in the interests of America! Our Putin is modest. Where are Russia's ambitions as a superpower? The more Russia will have the status of a superpower, the more allies we will have.

          In general, you are right - exactly status superpowers are now keeping the US afloat. And it would be nice for our country to have such a status, but before its restoration (for example, the era of the USSR), it is necessary to boost the economy. Before scattering ambitions, it makes sense to restore domestic production, ensure the food security of the country, restore high-tech industries and replenish their personnel, and only then declare themselves as SUPERPOWER.
          I agree with you - such a title bears considerable bonuses to the possessing country, but you have to correspond to this title (at least for a while winked ).
          It seems to me that the entire foreign policy of the Guarantor is aimed at ensuring that all funds and their ilk are left behind from our country, even for a short time, let them cough up in Syria, and we will build (restore) factories. And therefore, Trump's isolationism was preferable to our country than the ... old woman. Wait and see. wink
  8. poma
    poma 18 November 2016 09: 02
    +2
    UN - a whistle in which excess steam comes out.
  9. Observer2014
    Observer2014 18 November 2016 09: 03
    +8
    Russia is taken seriously in the world only when it is a strong state. And so it was in the Soviet era.
    And not only in Soviet Russia. It is contraindicated by history itself to be weak. The only thing to consider. Nobody can help financially just like that. Create comfortable conditions for your citizens inside the country.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 18 November 2016 11: 42
      +2
      09.03. Observer! To be a strong country, you must have a strong economy. Which country with a weak economy was strong? What kind of leaders do we like in Russia? Strong! Who is considered strong? Ivan the Terrible, Stalin. Who is weak? Nikolay the second, Gorbachev. It is in a nutshell. Do not help just like that? We just didn’t help anyone. Everywhere had its own meaning. Even the supply of KamAZ trucks to Cuba today is not just like that. Liberal enlighteners enlightened us about the supply of freebies. But this is far from the case. No freebies anywhere. Neither the Americans, nor ours. There is an under-reporting of aid interests.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 18 November 2016 12: 27
        +3
        34 region I agree. There is an underestimation of the interests of aid. Here I would like to hear from you about the huge debts from the time of the USSR to these countries.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 19 November 2016 01: 28
          +1
          12.27. Observer! What was written off is correct. Money was given to purchase our products. We immediately went to our enterprises. Such a financial injection that was paid by the credited countries. The enterprises created for these loans remained with us. And so it turned out PR of goodwill, write off loans. If a US bank gives a loan to purchase Boeing, then it goes to the Boeing. And loans to Ukraine go to corruption and the collapse of the country. This is such international corruption. hi
        2. 34 region
          34 region 19 November 2016 01: 42
          0
          12.27 Observer! Today we give loans for the construction of nuclear power plants. But these stations will be ours, not American ones. In this way, we invest in our production. We do not give credit for the construction of American nuclear power plants due to the injection of these funds into the US economy and its support. I hope now the policy of assistance and lending to other countries is clear. Helping others, helping ourselves. We talk a lot about big bank interest. And here we get an interest-free loan for which (and interest on it) the uncle pays. hi
  10. slava5553
    slava5553 18 November 2016 09: 07
    0
    And so, gentlemen of the jury, the process has begun. 23 for who is next?
  11. Knowing
    Knowing 18 November 2016 09: 07
    +2
    Very soon, dill will not be up to pride, they will begin to lynch corny.
  12. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 18 November 2016 09: 11
    +1
    “As for the position of Belarus, we regard it as a knife in the back,” Nezavisimaya Gazeta quoted her as saying. In her opinion, the Russians could soon invade Minsk. Therefore, Belarusians should defend independence: it is necessary “to understand that Minsk will be the next if Kiev does not defend independence today.” Ms. Gerashchenko’s criticism touched other CIS members: “We respect the right of Armenia and Kazakhstan to their special relations with the Russian Federation, we are all understand. But our friends in the friendly Kazakhstan and Armenia should understand that today Ukraine, the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian army are fighting not only for our independence. We defend the right of all post-Soviet countries to have an independent foreign policy. ”
    That would be so much furious saliva-snot of indignation to wipe, the handkerchief will not be big enough. A sheet is needed here. crying
  13. sl22277
    sl22277 18 November 2016 09: 12
    +3
    The current state of statehood in Ukraine, which was the direct result of an unconstitutional coup, poses a serious threat to the security of our entire continent. Ukrainian hostility will extend not only to Russia, but also to all dissenters, including their own citizens. The main enemy of Ukraine is primarily for itself, its citizens, politics, economics, reputation, etc.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 18 November 2016 11: 04
      +2
      Quote: sl22277
      The main enemy of Ukraine is primarily for itself, its citizens


      Correctly noticed. And another proof of this is the performance of a Nazi by conviction and a Jew by profession - I. Farion:
  14. Sibrusich
    Sibrusich 18 November 2016 09: 12
    0
    From a statistical point of view, this is certainly interesting, but personally I am interested in the result "fully approved" than "someone approved, but someone not."

    According to some of them, a change in the mood of a number of countries was affected by the Russian operation in Syria.


    But the author wrote this in vain. now're coming out-horses will shout that Putin "distracted the world from Ukraine by the war in Syria." Although, of course, we don't care
    1. 34 region
      34 region 18 November 2016 11: 49
      +1
      09.12/XNUMX. Well, why did the author write in vain? Not in vain. Exactly. Syria has shown a reference point. There is, of course, commercial interest (to show the weapons of Russia in battle). But that is not the point. Most importantly, they showed a will. Russia has finally got interests, and it will fight for them. Price doesn't matter.
      1. evge-malyshev
        evge-malyshev 18 November 2016 12: 04
        0
        Quote: Region 34
        Russia has finally got interests, and it will fight for them. Price doesn't matter.

        Interesting ... The price does not matter. Sometimes you have to think what you write.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 18 November 2016 12: 28
          +1
          12.04. Malyshev! How to say. If there is interest, then the price does not matter. hi The cost of the flight, the cost of expensive weapons, plus other expenses. This is all a trifle compared to your interests.
        2. 34 region
          34 region 18 November 2016 12: 35
          +1
          12.04. Malyshev! I also thought about our fishermen and hunters. If you compare the costs of fishing for fish or hare, then they are generally unprofitable. But what is interesting! Disregarding costs and revenues, people stubbornly spend money and time. What is your opinion about these people? According to Lavrov? hi
      2. Sibrusich
        Sibrusich 19 November 2016 13: 09
        0
        it was humor.
  15. Alex Xorkam
    Alex Xorkam 18 November 2016 09: 14
    +9
    The results of the vote at the UN General Assembly on the resolution on the situation in Crimea turned out to be very unpleasant, but not for Ukraine, but for all of Mankind. 73 states of a UN member state that they ignore the UN Charter and the UN Founding Documents on Human Rights and there are no 74 states that would consider this unacceptable. The UN General Assembly has ignored the right of residents of Crimea to self-determination and nothing - everyone is silent. we have to admit that at present the UN has lost its main functions and has become a haven for political prostitutes and idiots.
  16. Evil Elf
    Evil Elf 18 November 2016 09: 18
    +2
    And let's on the population. China 1,8 billion, India 1,2 billion already 3 billion supported Russia. And this is half the world's population
  17. Alexander Mazin
    Alexander Mazin 18 November 2016 09: 19
    +3
    If we do not continue to correct the strategic mistake we made when annexing Crimea, then neither the Ukrainians nor the West will calm down. It is necessary, nevertheless, to undertake the reunification of not territories, as we did with Crimea, but peoples. Moreover, the peoples of all Russia. Then we will become a single "nation" (like the Soviet people in the USSR), again become invincible (including the 5th column), create a single country, solve economic problems (create a new economic system instead of chaos), end the war in Donbass and in Syria, while Europe and the United States will begin to knock the Kremlin's thresholds with proposals to "make friends."
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 18 November 2016 09: 32
      +1
      Quote: Alexander Mazin
      If we do not continue to correct the strategic mistake that we made during the annexation of Crimea ...

      - what kind of "error" is this?

      Quote: Alexander Mazin
      One must, nevertheless, undertake the reunion of ... peoples. Moreover, the peoples of all of Russia

      - how is "reuniting" proposed?

      Your profile looked ... inspires yes
      1. Alexander Mazin
        Alexander Mazin April 7 2018 07: 54
        0
        So he already said: Putin annexed the lands, but it was necessary to reunite the peoples. How? To do this, build a single country. This is exactly what Putin categorically refuses to do all his terms of government. Therefore, the conclusion suggests itself that discord between the peoples of Russia is the true policy of Putin.
        By the way, Lenin built a new country, a new society, a new state, a new political and economic system in 5 years. Because he had a goal to save Russia from collapse. For 18 years, Putin could not do the elementary thing - to create a single country.
    2. MGB
      MGB 18 November 2016 09: 42
      +1
      Your parents made a strategic mistake, and then your teachers!
    3. BecmepH
      BecmepH 18 November 2016 10: 37
      +3
      Once again I regret that the "cons" were canceled. The site has a big "MINUS" for this.
      1. Varaga
        Varaga 18 November 2016 11: 02
        +1
        Judging by the photo you are.
  18. Amurets
    Amurets 18 November 2016 09: 22
    +1
    Moscow will not give up, and all UN members have long understood this. In principle, this is understood in Kiev. But they still believe in the "help" of the West. Well, the greater the disappointment!

    The West has its own headaches. Next year, elections in France and Germany are the main ones, as well as in a number of countries. In principle, in all major EU countries.
    http://www.pravda-tv.ru/2016/08/03/246128/vybory-
    v-stranax-es-v-2017-godu-potryasenij-ne-izbezhat
  19. antikilller55
    antikilller55 18 November 2016 09: 46
    0
    The poor are hot and SAVSEM are white, hope dies last)))
  20. vmo
    vmo 18 November 2016 09: 58
    0
    Ugly, this is forever! belay
  21. BecmepH
    BecmepH 18 November 2016 10: 29
    +1
    In her opinion, the Russians could soon invade Minsk.
    Iron (female) logic. And, for example, Liechtenstein can not invade Minsk? And Burkina Faso ?. Etc, etc ... According to the theory of probability, anyone can ... Around enemies, around the Kremlin)))
  22. predator4832
    predator4832 18 November 2016 10: 37
    +2
    Yes, I wonder, but what prevents some commissions and observers from coming to the Crimea and see how they live on the peninsula? Seems OK. They don’t want to. Some commissions are needed, which of course, like the IOC, will immediately find a violation of human rights. In Europe and the USA, of course, they don’t violate human rights wink
    They need to be allowed some banned organizations, can they immediately allow ISIS in Crimea? Naive Ukrainians scare Belarusians by attacking Russia. In Belarus there is no Maidan and no one seized power by force. Therefore, Belarus has nothing to fear. I would very much like to hope that Belarus will remain a friendly country for Russia. Yet Ukraine has always been an incomprehensible prodigal brother. I asked to go back and forth to Europe. Well, a normalization of the situation was to be expected. Soon, many countries will recognize Crimea as Russia, and they simply have no choice if they want comprehensive cooperation with our country. After all, Crimea is Russia and there is nothing to be done here, no ONN organizations, nothing can change this situation, only war. And World War 3 is a nuclear war, but they need it? For whom should hundreds of millions of people die? For US hegemonic interests? Maybe for the Nazi Ukraine that went down the bag? No. This is clearly not in their interests. Yes, they will conduct exercises, show that we are supposedly ready to fight. But no one will go to war with Russia, it's obvious. There are no fools. Everyone is just playing a political game and trying to intimidate each other, break each other with sanctions and reproaches. All these cancellations of the results of the Olympics, the cancellation of economic treaties, Russia is also responsible. And we will come out of many Western organizations. We will not lose from this. But the West will clearly lose. There will be no levers of pressure on our country. The West has put itself in this position. He did not want an equal partnership, he recognized the bloody coup d'etat in Ukraine. Well, I got what I have. The West has shown the world for sure that its organizations receive money in vain, they need to be dissolved long ago. IOC for sure. Think for yourself, they missed the "doping" of athletes to the competition, but after many years they allegedly found doping. This speaks of the incompetence of the organization. Damage to her reputation. Why aren't American dopingists being stripped of their awards? What difference does it make if the doctor gave permission or not? In Russia, everyone can get a permit, this is not a problem. In the US, I think too. This is a lie. This is clearly foul play. Check the entire US team, deprive everyone who took doping. If it is impossible, then it is impossible, let them be treated in hospitals, and do not perform in sports. Or allow doping to everyone. To have equal opportunities. This whole political game, a big show, who has more power (the United States), is the one who pulls the strings, does what he wants, deprives of awards, presses on the country, presses on politicians, presses on the world with his lies. The position of the United States and the West is gradually weakening. There is not much left and she will be completely weakened. The world is already beginning to get tired of this US hegemony.
  23. tommy717
    tommy717 18 November 2016 10: 40
    +1
    Quote: Spartanez300
    Gradually, people begin to understand what's what, over time, Ukraine will cease to be perceived as an adequate state.

    Rather, it would cease to exist as a state and a lot of problems would disappear by itself ...
    1. Koshak
      Koshak 18 November 2016 12: 23
      0
      "a lot of problems would have disappeared by themselves ..."
      eh, there will be a bunch of new problems ... sad
  24. tommy717
    tommy717 18 November 2016 10: 43
    +2
    “With regard to the position of Belarus, we regard it as a knife in the back,”
    And we regard it "as a knife in the back" when the union state does not vote in solidarity with us ...
  25. Varaga
    Varaga 18 November 2016 11: 00
    +1
    "The text calls on Russia to ensure" proper and unhindered access to the peninsula for international missions to monitor the situation in the field of human rights. "
    Ah, did you want SUPA ?!
  26. fiodora
    fiodora 18 November 2016 11: 01
    +2
    if international observers are not allowed into Crimea, then where does the information about the infringement of the rights of Tatars and other nationalities come from?
    1. Camel
      Camel 18 November 2016 21: 08
      0
      if international observers are not allowed into Crimea, then where does the information about the infringement of the rights of Tatars and other nationalities come from?

      From the Crimea! fellow
  27. uskrabut
    uskrabut 18 November 2016 11: 05
    +3
    Russia is taken seriously in the world only when it is a strong state. And so it was in the Soviet era
    It has always been so and always will be! This must be remembered, and first of all, our government must remember. That is, the authorities should abandon the liberal idea and adhere to the national one, and promote Russia's interests everywhere.
  28. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 November 2016 11: 29
    +2
    21 countries did not vote.

    These are those who considered themselves to be tricky themselves - we will leave aside for now, and let them sort it out. Then we'll see who to join. With such countries, as a result, it is also necessary to decide.
  29. nekot
    nekot 18 November 2016 11: 36
    +1
    It is interesting here only one who and how to vote. For example, Turkey - Erdogan again achieves tomatoes?))
  30. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 18 November 2016 11: 45
    +2
    The position of Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Israel is surprising. Especially these Central Asians. If not for Russia, they would have long been "Afghanistan in American style".
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 18 November 2016 12: 25
      +2
      Surprising position ... of Israel

      Is it strange that this position surprises you? And it is strange that you put Israel on a par with Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan ?. Israel has always defended only its interests, and this despite the fact that he received a billion in arms from the United States. And those countries that you affected also want to receive free money from Russia, while doing nothing in its interests.
  31. cyberhanter
    cyberhanter 18 November 2016 12: 12
    0
    It was a vote on the violation of human rights, on the ownership of the peninsula, so the author is lying from the very beginning
  32. gg.na
    gg.na 18 November 2016 13: 07
    +1
    Crimea has always been, is and will be RUSSIAN !!! There be another opinion No. can not!!! Well, with regards to ukrov, then I advise you to DOWNLOAD lol more... wassat there you can jump in the future laughing and Donbass !!! bully
  33. Evver
    Evver 18 November 2016 13: 44
    0
    After reading the headline, I decided - I missed something extraordinary in the news - well, the type at the UN passed a resolution that the entire leadership of the Square is fools!
    Some kind of unjustified euphoria reigns in the article. As with the election of Trump - in all Russian media.
    Calm down, comrades! And then - everything is straight, the United States is our sworn friend, for Ukraine, now it’s certainly a kirdyk, Merkel and Hollande are downed pilots ...
    It's only the beginning ...
  34. Kosmotoga
    Kosmotoga 18 November 2016 14: 18
    0
    Moldova can also be deleted now from those who voted for.
  35. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 18 November 2016 14: 19
    +2
    Among countries, the situation is the same as in any team: there are leaders who compete among themselves, and there are others who are a support group of one of the leaders. If there is no competition between leaders, dictatorship and lawlessness begin. Therefore, the states have gone too far from the lack of competition. It was better for the peoples of the world when the USSR existed: in the socialist countries people felt protected, though they did not appreciate it, but the capitalists were forced to reckon with the demands of labor collectives. The United States, having created military bases around the world, began to mess around, and only Russia, in its geographical position, is able to withstand the arrogant hegemon. Russia will become strong and invulnerable - other countries will be on its side. You can say anything, but no country wants to be pushed around by it, to destroy its cities and towns, because the hegemon so wants.
    In the meantime, the Russian Federation needs to become strong, and it will only happen when the economic model is not dependent on the outside and vulnerable. Today, alas, the Russian Federation has fists, and the head is occupied with the economic support of the enemy, in the economic part of the head it is necessary to remove foreign bodies so that the whole organism is healthy. Then countries will stop voting in international organizations for fear of hegemony.
  36. derik1970
    derik1970 18 November 2016 14: 31
    +1
    23 states against, 73 supported what? where is the surprise reasoning about what could be, they are generally out of place ... it’s not harmful to dream ... and it turns out to us that they are trying to pretend that Russia is somewhere in something and about nothing ... that’s joy about nothing ...
  37. Phosgene
    Phosgene 18 November 2016 14: 32
    +2
    And when the Russians are killed in the basements of the SBU is the observance of human rights, or what ?! In my opinion, this is genocide!
  38. krops777
    krops777 18 November 2016 15: 36
    +1
    Who is Ukraine? They voted and forgot, it is possible against, without looking back at Washington, he is not up to them now, there is a great sharing, and each close person wants to grab his piece of the pie.
  39. 1536
    1536 18 November 2016 17: 07
    +2
    I’m still wondering who lived next to us in the years of the USSR in a single country? The answer suggests itself: these are those who desired the death of the state in order to please their Nazi ambitions. I caught myself thinking that recently I have become wary of Ukrainian names, especially obviously from western Ukraine. It's hard to say what they have in mind.
  40. Retvizan
    Retvizan 18 November 2016 18: 00
    0
    I did not read cheers patriotic hat comments, I’ll write my own right away.
    This is surprising ... you can even find a positive in the negative. Even here they accepted the main part. Well, okay, but the fact that joy was found in comparing 2 completely different resolutions ?????
    Resolution of the UN General Assembly A / RES / 68 / 262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine is a document adopted by the 27 on March 2014 as a result of an open vote at the 80 plenary meeting of the 68 session of the UN General Assembly. According to the resolution, the UN General Assembly confirms the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders and does not recognize the legality of any change in the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the status of the city of Sevastopol, based on the results of the Crimean referendum held on March 16 2014 year, since this referendum , according to this resolution, has no legal force.
    Of the 193 UN member countries, 100 spoke in favor, 11 opposed, 58 countries abstained and 24 countries did not vote
    и
    The UN Committee on Social and Humanitarian Issues adopted a resolution on human rights violations in Crimea.
    The resolution was proposed by Ukraine. It states, in particular, that in the annexed Crimea by Russia the rights of the Crimean Tatar people and other national minorities are infringed.

    The resolution also calls on Russia to admit international observers to the peninsula.

    The resolution demands to cancel the decision made by the Supreme Court of Russia on recognizing the public organization "Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People" as extremist and banning its activities.
    73 countries voted for the document, 23 opposed, including Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Venezuela, China and others.
    The position of the Republic of Belarus when trying to block the resolution did not find a large number of supporters.
    As for the resolution itself, it can only be distinguished by verbs
    Condemns human rights abuses
    2. Urges the Russian Federation:
    3. Requests the Secretary-General to seek ways and means ... to ensure safe and unhindered access to Crimea
    4. Urges the Russian Federation
    5. Requests the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
    6. Decides to continue consideration of this matter.
    That is asks, urges, urges and so on.
    Well temporary occupation of Crimea will be listed in all UN documents on the peninsula.
    What is the problem? The threat of a military coalition? Blocking Russian financial flows? The threat of war?
    Well, except that in the courts there may be problems. Well, I'm sorry, redraw the boundaries that they themselves recognized, is also worth something. You can certainly score on the courts too.
    But I can do it on the basis of 2 resolutions .. in my opinion it is strange.
    1. Camel
      Camel 18 November 2016 21: 17
      +2
      Well, I'm sorry, redraw the boundaries that they themselves recognized, is also worth something.

      But are there officially demarcated borders between the Russian Federation and the UR? And they are declared in the UN? What specific boundaries do you mean?
  41. Penzyac
    Penzyac 18 November 2016 18: 10
    +1
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Spartanez300
    Gradually, people begin to understand what's what, over time, Ukraine will cease to be perceived as an adequate state.

    After the Maidan, no one considers Ukraine an adequate state, but simply play this card blindly as pressure on the Russian Federation.

    Or, as a fawn on the United States, they still won’t understand that the world has already changed and America is no longer needed to be so afraid, and all the more to wait for adequate money from it ...
  42. Retvizan
    Retvizan 18 November 2016 18: 18
    +1
    Forgot to finish the namesake.
    Oleg, in addition to comparing two different resolutions, you have concluded this one. But why did you keep silent about the main "unpleasant surprise for Ukraine" in the person of Belarus? After all, now attacks on Belarus in the person of VO observers have become so frequent, and the position of Belarus on the adoption of the Resolution was clearly pro-Russian (an attempt to block). That is, the Republic of Belarus acted in the interests of the Russian Federation, and it is so obvious that here was the main surprise for Ukraine. And this is despite all the evil that Belarusians receive from the Russians. RB clearly defended the interests of the Russian Federation.
    This moment was what was to be expected in this article. And not a comparison of two different resolutions on different topics.
    From myself, well done RB. Not because I'm against partners or something else. And because they were for themselves and for that guy who sometimes offends them undeservedly. It is expensive.
    1. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim 18 November 2016 19: 33
      +1
      Quote: Retvizan
      RB clearly defended the interests of the Russian Federation ...

      You absolutely underestimate the cunning and resourcefulness of Lukashenko. The commentary of the press secretary of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry states that “the position of the Republic of Belarus on Ukraine has not changed one iota”: “The issue of the review procedure human rights at the UN lies in a completely different plane and, in our firm conviction, has nothing to do with the topic of territorial integrity of Ukraine. ” Rygorych has a long-standing conflict with the UN Third Committee, which deals with human rights and several times adopted critical resolutions on human rights violations in Belarus.
      The economy of Belarus, which Lukashenko created, is no longer even able to pay for the cheapest Russian gas in Europe, and on November 22, he asked for a meeting with Putin in Moscow. Before this meeting, Lukashenko earned an extra trump card at the UN and, as always, when he needs to milk Russia, he recalls his allied obligations.
      1. 34 region
        34 region 19 November 2016 13: 37
        0
        19.33. Klim! What time! Crisis all over the world and only in Belarus it is not !!! Russia also has problems. And Syria.
        1. Anatole Klim
          Anatole Klim 19 November 2016 14: 20
          0
          Quote: Region 34
          What time! Crisis all over the world and only in Belarus it is not !!! Russia also has problems.

          So I am about the same. Only Russia seeks to overcome the crisis on its own, and Rygorych decided to do it at our expense, for example, he began to unilaterally pay half the cost of gas and a debt of $ 300 million has already been formed. You come to the store and buy bread, they say 20 rubles to you, and you say: so I’m your friend sometimes, and I will pay 10 rubles. This does not remind you of the neighboring land. Instead of carrying out reforms, the great chairman was accustomed to compensate for his failures at the expense of Russia, and he did not care that Russia itself was in crisis, the main thing was to stay in power, and if anything, he would begin to frighten the Belarusian Maidan, look at the GDP and fork out.
      2. Retvizan
        Retvizan 19 November 2016 15: 04
        0
        Quote: Anatol Klim
        Rygorych has a long-standing conflict with the UN Third Committee

        what is it about, then his interest coincided. However, the resolution was on cases in the Crimea.
  43. esaul1950
    esaul1950 18 November 2016 19: 14
    +1
    Quote: ahpar2
    [b] [/ b] The delegation of Armenia voted against this resolution and what does my country receive in return from Russia? Contemptuous spits in the face from Russian nationalists, nothing else. The last war in Karabakh showed that Armenia is heading towards national catastrophe, choosing Russia as its ally (I did not correctly put it - becoming a voluntary vassal of the Russians). Israel now votes for and receives annually huge weapons worth billions of dollars, and free of charge, and Armenia has weakened so much, relying on Russia that "our" president at every convenient and inconvenient occasion "trumps" these notorious "Iskander", forgetting that with the draft defense budget for 2017 a year in Azerbaijan, the figure was set at 1,7 billion dollars, and now, after showing these notorious missiles, Azerbaijan has increased its defense budget by another 70%!

    Forward, into the arms of Turkey, learn to live and protect yourself. I remember your spitting, and not only in the face of the Slavs.
  44. esaul1950
    esaul1950 18 November 2016 19: 24
    0
    Well friends, when are we going to Minsk? What is the head of Mr. (not Madam) Irina Gerashchenko? The surname is known. Amen.
  45. Dekabrist
    Dekabrist 18 November 2016 23: 51
    +1
    I reread the article twice, but I still did not understand what the bitterness is and where the surprise is. Or, instead of the abstract "Kiev" in the title, there should be a list of specific sufferers, since for the average Ukrainian the issue of Crimea has long been closed
  46. Simfy
    Simfy 18 November 2016 23: 54
    0
    and blocking the channel with water and turning off the electricity in the winter, Russia does not want to propose voting on the resolution on the genocide of Ukraine? !!!
  47. Orionvit
    Orionvit 19 November 2016 00: 35
    +1
    Quote: Wiskar
    Russia considers Israel to be an occupier and supports all anti-Israeli resolutions ..

    And what, Israel held a popular referendum in the occupied territories?
  48. pm.sv.3691
    pm.sv.3691 19 November 2016 05: 50
    0
    Everything will fall into place, another five years will pass and the Poroshenko government will be judged at the "SOCHINSKY PROCESS" and not in The Hague!
  49. Normal ok
    Normal ok 19 November 2016 11: 26
    0
    Damn, well, this is purely in Ukrainian - issue the problem of victory. The UN has adopted an anti-Russian resolution on the Crimea, and the author is trying to pass it off as too much.
    1. Retvizan
      Retvizan 19 November 2016 15: 06
      0
      so they compared two resolutions, they saw that fewer people voted FOR rights in Crimea than for ter. the integrity of Ukraine, and then, it’s overstretched ... Like, over time, that's the recognition of Crimea, since the country has voted FOR less (well or more Against)
  50. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 19 November 2016 16: 33
    +1
    Russia is taken seriously in the world only when it is a strong state. And so it was in the Soviet era.

    Russia has matured to resist the attacks of the "democrats" of the West and their petty mongrels. And if it is possible to defend Syria too, then the horses in the UN should no longer appear, let alone push some resolutions across Crimea with the consent of their masters. And these resolutions do not bind to anything, and the barking of the "subjects" of the SGA for the bear is a shaking of the air and pollution of the environment! Nothing, and we will not stand it. The main thing inside the country is to clean up the "liberal" swamp! hi