Military Review

Around Syria again chemochat

22
Around Syria again chemochat



Is it possible to imagine such a villain of the militants of the “Syrian opposition”, as a result of which its patrons would finally refuse its support? Where is that same “red line” that even “freedom fighters” cannot enter?

Here for the legitimate Syrian government in 2013, the “red line” was designated - this is the use of chemical weapons. And after the large-scale 21 provocation of August of the same year, as we remember, the case almost ended in direct aggression against the SAR. Then, with the help of Russia, a compromise was found, as a result of which Damascus refused chemical weapons and agreed to its liquidation.

It is worth remembering about the difficulties encountered in the process of exporting these substances. Militants of the "opposition" repeatedly attacked specialists from the joint mission of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and the UN, who arrived in the country to carry out the process of eliminating hazardous chemicals, attacked convoys that exported these substances.

The "opposition" and its owners were not at all beneficial to the consent of the Syrian leadership on the elimination of chemical weapons. They opposed the export of these substances in the exact time. Because the reason for such a desired and already planned attack disappeared. One can only imagine how the experts of the OPCW and the UN "dug their nose” to at least find fault with something. But they were still forced to state in 2014 that the process of abandoning chemical weapons and their elimination of Syria was completed on time. Thus, the Syrian government no longer has anything “seditious”.

Now, the OPCW Executive Council, under pressure from certain countries, adopts an underlined anti-Syrian resolution. It happened on November 11 at the session in The Hague. This place is too symbolic - it is in The Hague that it has been repeatedly in the newest stories unjust trials took place and biased sentences were issued. Yes, of course, it was done by another body, but strange coincidences are a feeling that the OPCW is now controlled by the same forces as the Hague Court ...

This decision did not come as a surprise, since it was preceded by numerous false accusations against the Syrian leadership. These accusations made by Western politicians and the media sounded shortly after the OPCW and the UN reported on the removal of chemical weapons from Syria and their destruction. It’s too profitable to impose such slander on the legitimate authority of the SAR - and public opinion can be adjusted accordingly, and again talking about the “inhuman regime”, keeping the country under constant threat.

But the OPCW, becoming a toy in the hands of those who continue to cherish the dreams of direct aggression, actually crosses out the work of their own experts. Which, by the way, worked under the fire of terrorists, removing these most toxic substances from Syria.

The Syrian Foreign Ministry issued a statement categorically denied the allegations made by the OPCW. “The Syrian government, starting with the 2014 of the year and to this day, has been fully assisting in the provision of all that is necessary for the international commissions to conduct a credible investigation. Substantial evidence and witness testimony were provided that some terrorist groups fabricated cases of alleged use of chemical weapons. ”, the document says.

The Russian Foreign Ministry also condemned the deceptive performance at the OPCW: “During a session of the Executive Council of the OPCW 11 in November in The Hague as a result of a multi-way combination with active use of the“ regional solidarity factor ”, a group of Member States managed to push through an anti-Syrian decision based on unconvincing, in fact, accusing Damascus conclusions of the Joint OPCW-UN mechanism investigating the use of chemical weapons in this country ... We call on all states that are on the road to generally accepted international principles and norms to put a barrier to this unprincipled and Responsibility.

It is worth paying special attention to the following fact: shortly before the session of the Executive Council of the OPCW, which turned into a sanctions decision against Syria, there was a fact of the use of projectiles with a toxic substance from the "opposition" in Aleppo. It happened on October 30 against the Dahiyat Al-Asad and Al-Hamdania areas. Two Syrian soldiers killed at least 37 civilians were hospitalized. Witnesses are talking about the "unknown white gas" that people breathed.

Russian experts have taken soil samples in these areas. The official representative of the Ministry of Defense of Russia, Igor Konashenkov, stated that these samples would be thoroughly investigated in the laboratory of the Scientific Center of the Radiation, Chemical and Biological Defense Forces. This institution is accredited by the OPCW itself. Express analyzes have shown: ammunition filled with chlorine and white phosphorus was used.

The fact that the militants of the "opposition" have factories in which shells are made with chemical warheads, the Syrian government has repeatedly stated. Special letters were sent to the UN about this, none of which the most authoritative organization in the world found it necessary to answer. The Syrian leadership also spoke with alarm about the seizure of chemical plants by terrorists - no reaction. But anti-Syrian fake "reports" were produced by bundles.

But after all as a result of this policy, toxic substances are not only in the hands of “white and fluffy” “moderate” opposition members, but also in the hands of the notorious ISIS (organizations banned in the Russian Federation). And now US officials fear that in Iraqi Mosul chemical weapons will be used against American soldiers. So, the director of the American National Intelligence, James Clapper, at a security conference in Munich, said: “ISIS wants to use chemical weapons against us».

But still, as we see, the anti-Syrian bias persists in the international arena.

Meanwhile, the Syrian Agency SANA reports that on November 14, terrorists again used shells stuffed with chlorine. These shells fired at the area of ​​An-Neirab in Aleppo. As a result, dozens of victims ...
Author:
22 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 16 November 2016 15: 09
    +7
    The question is, where does Daesh have so many chemical weapons? The supply of weapons to ISIS is uninterrupted. And much of what is happening now is the result of truces and downtime. It is necessary to let the military do their work, and not help the souls with truces, so that they rearm, replenish their ranks and dig deeper.
    1. APASUS
      APASUS 16 November 2016 18: 17
      +3
      Quote: NEXUS
      The question is, where does Daesh have so many chemical weapons?

      It’s not a question at all, the owners give, for example, chlorine - it is used in industry.
      Why is it another matter? And here’s the hint that, having crossed this line, the West will immediately attack Assad. Especially not understanding this, he applied or baboons.
      Another full pretext ......................... everything is very simple!
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 16 November 2016 18: 26
        +4
        Quote: APASUS
        Another full pretext ......................... everything is very simple!

        Mattresses are masters of meanness and hypocrisy. Another question is what should we do with these? Distributing gas masks to the Syrians? But what about the civilian population? I see only one way - it is to block both land channels and air supplies of Daesh weapons, but it’s clear that it’s easy to say, but to do ... while the Iranians and Chinese are behaving incomprehensibly. What are they waiting for? Or do they like this long-playing story stretching for 5 years? By the way, the Second World War was shorter in time and Hitler did not use chemical weapons. Then these Igilovites do not even bother to call the language of animals. Inhumans, as well as their owners and sponsors.
        This is not only about the United States, but also about Saudi Arabia, which has long been asking that all of these shahs, sultans and sheikhs were hanged in public on the pillars of the main street of Riyadh.
        1. OLD FART
          OLD FART 16 November 2016 20: 17
          0
          I think Europe will wait soon .... Everything goes to this, they directly help them! God forbid of course ... but

          Demons accepted, wait ...
        2. Evil Elf
          Evil Elf 17 November 2016 12: 58
          0
          I read about why Hitler did not use chemical weapons. He himself received a burn of the upper respiratory tract in World War I
          1. novel66
            novel66 18 November 2016 10: 09
            +2
            well, actually there was something like a tacit agreement on non-use, even the movie was.
  2. EvgNik
    EvgNik 16 November 2016 15: 14
    +3
    Is it possible to imagine such a villainy of the militants of the “Syrian opposition”, as a result of which its patrons would finally abandon its support?

    Can. The attack in the White House. Only this is not villainy, but a good deed.
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 16 November 2016 15: 32
      +2
      Quote: EvgNik
      The attack in the White House.


      If everything was so simple, but ... alas, the roots of everything that happens around Syria, not only in the White House.
      1. KaPToC
        KaPToC 16 November 2016 15: 41
        +2
        Quote: B.T.W.
        If everything was so simple, but ... alas, the roots of everything that happens around Syria, not only in the White House.

        Come on, we’ll tear apart the Buckingham Palace.
        1. EvgNik
          EvgNik 16 November 2016 16: 17
          +4
          Quote: B.T.W.
          the roots of everything that happens around Syria, not only in the White House

          Quote: KaPToC
          in addition to buckingham palace

          I agree with opponents almost completely. Only we will not tear, but ISIS (banned in Russia). This is their prerogative.
          1. OLD FART
            OLD FART 16 November 2016 19: 24
            +1
            Quote: EvgNik
            Quote: B.T.W.
            the roots of everything that happens around Syria, not only in the White House

            Quote: KaPToC
            in addition to buckingham palace

            I agree with opponents almost completely. Only we will not tear, but ISIS (banned in Russia). This is their prerogative.

            Eugene igil on our website, this is an abusive word, so you can without brackets with a reminder ... bully Do not think that I just find fault with the words, as a liberalist (let them write it ..)))))) bully
            1. elenagromova
              16 November 2016 23: 31
              +1
              Articles should be written that ISIS is banned in Russia. Although it sometimes looks ridiculous, but not to find fault with the site. In the comments - it's hard to say ...
              1. EvgNik
                EvgNik 17 November 2016 05: 03
                +2
                Quote: elenagromova
                It's hard to say in the comments ...

                Elena, write - the hand will not fall off. Forbidden, so forbidden. I would have banned many more. And with pleasure reminded of this.
            2. EvgNik
              EvgNik 17 November 2016 05: 00
              +1
              Quote: STARPER
              without brackets with a reminder.

              Vitaly, I try to follow the rules.
    2. Evil Elf
      Evil Elf April 28 2017 18: 27
      0
      In Brussels, a terrorist attack with chemical weapons is the very thing. Let Assad be blamed at the UN and Charlie Ebdo draw caricatures. Or eyes open
  3. DMoroz
    DMoroz 16 November 2016 16: 17
    +1
    The US fears that in Iraqi Mosul chemical weapons will be used against American soldiers.

    In their opinion, chemical weapons can be used even against everyone, but not against themselves.
  4. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 16 November 2016 16: 53
    +1
    So, Director of American National Intelligence James Klapper at a security conference in Munich said: “ISIS wants to use chemical weapons against us.”
    And you, flawed, having created ISIS and others like him, to overthrow B. Assad, thought you grabbed God by the beard? No-oh, all this will come back to haunt you now! "Don't dig a hole for another ..." But you Americans, as always, are afraid of your eyes, and your hands are dirty.
  5. Snail N9
    Snail N9 16 November 2016 19: 54
    0
    At the beginning of the Syrian tragedy, the "West", in order to clear itself of any accusations of aiding terrorists in Syria, as well as to justify its unwillingness to end the confrontation in this country and free its hands for any action, declared the Assad government "INLEGAL". And what is "illegitimate"? And the fact that this government does not exist for the "West". Doesn't exist at all. Merkel herself explained this from a high rostrum: "Assad's government is" illegitimate "for us and we will not contact him on any occasion. This government is not for us ....." That's all. And back they will not win back and will not change their opinions.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 16 November 2016 20: 12
      +1
      Quote: Snail N9
      Merkel explained this from a high rostrum - "Assad's government is" illegitimate for us "

      I think Assad will soon be able to say this with respect to Merkel. yes
      1. Evil Elf
        Evil Elf 17 November 2016 13: 00
        +1
        She herself .... illegitimate
  6. alex-cn
    alex-cn 17 November 2016 04: 31
    +2
    Westerners do not recognize the existence of chemical weapons among terrorists until they themselves (Westerners) fly firmly, with noticeable losses. And then ..... Oh, a lot has been invested in terrorists ...
  7. Evil Elf
    Evil Elf 17 November 2016 12: 59
    +1
    Saudis wipe off the face of the earth