Trump (FBI) / Clinton (CIA): 290 / 232
After the presidential victory of Donald Trump, a video with a young Donald - a businessman went on TV, where he says: “I’m not getting involved in losing business,” and continues: “If I were nominated for the presidency, I would have many chances. And Donald Trump is the elected president of the United States 45. This is a political earthquake, and it can not be an accident. This is evidenced in a long-standing interview by Donald Trump himself.
The world "democratic" media are now in prostration, as it were, and they are composing explanations for their unfulfilled predictions about the imminent victory of Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump. The explanations are very different, but all with a hint of a certain miracle.
Even the Russian media, which it would not seem necessary to hide their face from shame, also hint at a miracle that happened, such as an "enraged white middle class" massively voted for Trump, and repeat the banal thesis about "overstretching the US in building a unipolar world." True, they say that Clinton’s excessive propaganda by the Western media and Trump’s scandalous harassment had the opposite effect.
All this is correct, but this is not the whole truth, because one very important thing is left out of the box: politics is a dirty business, and electoral politics is an extremely dirty business, and there is no sense for the Russian side to cover this, unlike the US.
According to open information, Clinton should have won the elections, because with relatively equal chances of the parties in the election campaign, the ruling elites determine the winner, because the 5-10% manipulations in the elections, almost imperceptible, are the inalienable "democratic" right of the ruling elites by easy clicking on the administrative resource. The administrative resource Obama used at full capacity ...
Therefore, the overwhelming majority of experts and sociologists, knowing about themselves this secret of democracy, prophesied the victory of Hillary Clinton, the favorite of the ruling establishment and the world media. In my articles, I also spoke bitterly about the “Pyrrhic victory” of Clinton, in view of the unfavorable scenario for Trump of the US elites.
True, in the last article, “The Demarche of FBI Director James Komi,” I drew attention to a strange movement in the US elites, whose markers were FBI Director James Komi and economist Jeffrey Sachs: they openly supported Donald Trump. It was not an SOS signal, as I thought, it was a signal for the final phase of Trump’s election campaign, which, as it now became clear, was covered by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation.
From the very beginning, the FBI secretly supported Trump: ignored his harassment by the media, did not confirm the “attack” of the Democratic Party’s servers by Russian hackers, Trump’s connections with Putin, and, on the contrary, investigated Clinton’s “mail scandals”.
Another major factor in Trump’s victory was the mistake of Clinton’s headquarters, and its globalist bosses, in using the figure of Russian President Vladimir Putin in a purely internal matter - the US presidential campaign! For some reason they decided that they would be able to defame Trump by Putin to their advantage. This is a very controversial message, all the more so since they, by doing so, made Putin a participant in the presidential race, and gave him the opportunity to influence its outcome! It’s known that many in the West would like to have “their Putin”, and in Trump many voters saw “American Putin”!
An attempt to present Trump to Putin’s puppet looked like sheer stupidity, although the rational grain of globalists was present here. It was not by chance that, at the same time as the world media was harassed by Trump Putin, attempts were made to provoke Russia to exacerbate the confrontation, especially in Syria, starting with the bombing of Syrian troops near Deir Ez-Zor, accusing Russia of war crimes in Aleppo, and then - everywhere.
However, Russia did not respond to these attacks, in general. In Aleppo even declared a humanitarian truce. If Russia succumbed to provocations, the global crisis broke out, the anti-Russian hysteria blocked all reasonable arguments, and Trump, with his intention to resume dialogue with Russia, would become impassable.
Thus, ignoring provocations and Putin's stoic neutrality during the election campaign, with a refrain: “Moscow will work with any elected US president”, created the necessary background for electing Trump, one might say Putin did this a great service. Although Vladimir Vladimirovich acted in the interests of Russia.
The FBI’s resumption of the Clinton “postal case” investigation a few days before the 8 election in November showed the seriousness of the FBI’s and Trump’s intentions, so the future ex-president Barack Obama admitted his biggest mistake — the appointment of the FBI director James Komi. The FBI’s termination of the Clinton case before the very voting was not a Komi retreat, as the world media decided: otherwise the presidential election simply would not have taken place, and Trump's victory was impossible! Trump said at the rally then: “We will not be stopped!” Observers accepted this slogan for Trump’s last convulsions, and this was the winner’s manifesto! The outcome of the election was already predetermined.
The unexpected voting course of November 8 was not a surprise, not only for Trump, but also for Clinton. On the morning of November 9, when it was still allegedly swinging on the scales of fortune, Clinton canceled the holiday salute in honor of her election victory. But a more eloquent fact is the unconditional and hasty congratulation of Hillary Clinton on the victory of Donald Trump. It discouraged its supporters by making the protests on the results of the vote senseless. These protests are going on today, but only by inertia, because the protest itself is decapitated: Clinton, of its own will, declared itself a loser, therefore the “democratic” protest is doomed. And the color revolution in the United States is at least postponed.
Why did Clinton give up the fight, did not dispute the election results, because the entire establishment supposedly supports it ?! What does this mean? That not all, and not even the majority of American elites, stands for Clinton, but only the so-called global “globalist”, or neocon-neo-Trotskyist elites, supported by the global “democratic” media and the CIA - the main tools for asserting “world permanent democracy” in the world and even in the USA.
Today they talk a lot about the phenomenon of Donald Trump, the lone hero who defeated the political system. Trump, of course, is a phenomenon in the sense of the rhetorical design of his campaign, which overthrew all electoral rules and attracted a lot of voters to it, despite the defamation of the world media. That's just Trump is not a loner.
The results of the November 8 elections say that a counter-elite formed in the United States, led by billionaire Donald Trump. From the ashes rose the old conservative elite of the United States, quite systemic for America, broken by the “world” neocons in the second half of the twentieth century, and thrown by them, as they were sure, to the dump stories. She is a counter elite only for the neocon "world democratic elite." The "old conservatives" were able, in secret from official Washington, to mobilize and develop their plan for the presidential campaign, apparently with the help of the FBI.
Trump was a part of this old elite, so he knew that he had a chance to become president. For the “old conservatives,” Trump was a very attractive presidential candidate, as he combined the experience of a businessman and a television host, a showman. Strong cocktail! American democracy, in the sense of presidential elections, was used by the old elites of the United States as a formal and legitimate tool for coming to power. And revenge on the neocons!
Apparently, the old US elites, with the help of the FBI, made it impossible for the falsification of the elections in favor of Clinton, and, perhaps, the Clinton victory itself, to be impossible. For example, taking control of polling stations in the country and counting votes in troubled states. The FBI is the country's internal security service! The CIA is a foreign intelligence service, so on the territory of the US FBI itself has priority over the CIA. In any case, according to the law.
Clinton and Obama, concerned, apparently informed about the changes during the voting, so convincingly that Clinton canceled the holiday fireworks and unconditionally congratulated Trump on his victory. Perhaps for providing security guarantees and not prosecution under the law. This version is also supported by the fact that Trump was more aggressive during the voting: he declared violations during the voting, he threatened to challenge the election results, Clinton was silent.
It can be said that Donald Trump and the FBI defeated Hilary Clinton and the CIA in the November 8 elections. We can say that American democracy won the "world democracy." Therefore, one can hope that the national interests of the United States will no longer be sacrificed to the neocons' plans of "world democracy", which, incidentally, is surprisingly reminiscent of "world communism." Understanding that democracy is not only the voice of the people, but also the voice of the media, and control over the counting of votes.
20 January 2017 will be the inauguration of Donald Trump, and, in a sense, the old US elites behind him, and James Komi, who fulfilled the role of the midwife of the Trump presidency. Since Trump is not alone, the argument that the neocons in Washington will be able to ride him is not convincing. Trump's crushing victory in the election suggests that he has already told Obama his phrase from the rally: “You are fired!”
Trump, and his friends, came to power seriously and for a long time. Of course, they will not fulfill everything they promised, but will strive for it. The first thing they promise to do, according to Trump: "drain the Washington marsh." Then all his hangers-on, from Brussels to Kiev and Moscow, will remain without "swamp" handouts.
The world "democratic" media are now in prostration, as it were, and they are composing explanations for their unfulfilled predictions about the imminent victory of Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump. The explanations are very different, but all with a hint of a certain miracle.
Even the Russian media, which it would not seem necessary to hide their face from shame, also hint at a miracle that happened, such as an "enraged white middle class" massively voted for Trump, and repeat the banal thesis about "overstretching the US in building a unipolar world." True, they say that Clinton’s excessive propaganda by the Western media and Trump’s scandalous harassment had the opposite effect.
All this is correct, but this is not the whole truth, because one very important thing is left out of the box: politics is a dirty business, and electoral politics is an extremely dirty business, and there is no sense for the Russian side to cover this, unlike the US.
According to open information, Clinton should have won the elections, because with relatively equal chances of the parties in the election campaign, the ruling elites determine the winner, because the 5-10% manipulations in the elections, almost imperceptible, are the inalienable "democratic" right of the ruling elites by easy clicking on the administrative resource. The administrative resource Obama used at full capacity ...
Therefore, the overwhelming majority of experts and sociologists, knowing about themselves this secret of democracy, prophesied the victory of Hillary Clinton, the favorite of the ruling establishment and the world media. In my articles, I also spoke bitterly about the “Pyrrhic victory” of Clinton, in view of the unfavorable scenario for Trump of the US elites.
True, in the last article, “The Demarche of FBI Director James Komi,” I drew attention to a strange movement in the US elites, whose markers were FBI Director James Komi and economist Jeffrey Sachs: they openly supported Donald Trump. It was not an SOS signal, as I thought, it was a signal for the final phase of Trump’s election campaign, which, as it now became clear, was covered by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation.
From the very beginning, the FBI secretly supported Trump: ignored his harassment by the media, did not confirm the “attack” of the Democratic Party’s servers by Russian hackers, Trump’s connections with Putin, and, on the contrary, investigated Clinton’s “mail scandals”.
Another major factor in Trump’s victory was the mistake of Clinton’s headquarters, and its globalist bosses, in using the figure of Russian President Vladimir Putin in a purely internal matter - the US presidential campaign! For some reason they decided that they would be able to defame Trump by Putin to their advantage. This is a very controversial message, all the more so since they, by doing so, made Putin a participant in the presidential race, and gave him the opportunity to influence its outcome! It’s known that many in the West would like to have “their Putin”, and in Trump many voters saw “American Putin”!
An attempt to present Trump to Putin’s puppet looked like sheer stupidity, although the rational grain of globalists was present here. It was not by chance that, at the same time as the world media was harassed by Trump Putin, attempts were made to provoke Russia to exacerbate the confrontation, especially in Syria, starting with the bombing of Syrian troops near Deir Ez-Zor, accusing Russia of war crimes in Aleppo, and then - everywhere.
However, Russia did not respond to these attacks, in general. In Aleppo even declared a humanitarian truce. If Russia succumbed to provocations, the global crisis broke out, the anti-Russian hysteria blocked all reasonable arguments, and Trump, with his intention to resume dialogue with Russia, would become impassable.
Thus, ignoring provocations and Putin's stoic neutrality during the election campaign, with a refrain: “Moscow will work with any elected US president”, created the necessary background for electing Trump, one might say Putin did this a great service. Although Vladimir Vladimirovich acted in the interests of Russia.
The FBI’s resumption of the Clinton “postal case” investigation a few days before the 8 election in November showed the seriousness of the FBI’s and Trump’s intentions, so the future ex-president Barack Obama admitted his biggest mistake — the appointment of the FBI director James Komi. The FBI’s termination of the Clinton case before the very voting was not a Komi retreat, as the world media decided: otherwise the presidential election simply would not have taken place, and Trump's victory was impossible! Trump said at the rally then: “We will not be stopped!” Observers accepted this slogan for Trump’s last convulsions, and this was the winner’s manifesto! The outcome of the election was already predetermined.
The unexpected voting course of November 8 was not a surprise, not only for Trump, but also for Clinton. On the morning of November 9, when it was still allegedly swinging on the scales of fortune, Clinton canceled the holiday salute in honor of her election victory. But a more eloquent fact is the unconditional and hasty congratulation of Hillary Clinton on the victory of Donald Trump. It discouraged its supporters by making the protests on the results of the vote senseless. These protests are going on today, but only by inertia, because the protest itself is decapitated: Clinton, of its own will, declared itself a loser, therefore the “democratic” protest is doomed. And the color revolution in the United States is at least postponed.
Why did Clinton give up the fight, did not dispute the election results, because the entire establishment supposedly supports it ?! What does this mean? That not all, and not even the majority of American elites, stands for Clinton, but only the so-called global “globalist”, or neocon-neo-Trotskyist elites, supported by the global “democratic” media and the CIA - the main tools for asserting “world permanent democracy” in the world and even in the USA.
Today they talk a lot about the phenomenon of Donald Trump, the lone hero who defeated the political system. Trump, of course, is a phenomenon in the sense of the rhetorical design of his campaign, which overthrew all electoral rules and attracted a lot of voters to it, despite the defamation of the world media. That's just Trump is not a loner.
The results of the November 8 elections say that a counter-elite formed in the United States, led by billionaire Donald Trump. From the ashes rose the old conservative elite of the United States, quite systemic for America, broken by the “world” neocons in the second half of the twentieth century, and thrown by them, as they were sure, to the dump stories. She is a counter elite only for the neocon "world democratic elite." The "old conservatives" were able, in secret from official Washington, to mobilize and develop their plan for the presidential campaign, apparently with the help of the FBI.
Trump was a part of this old elite, so he knew that he had a chance to become president. For the “old conservatives,” Trump was a very attractive presidential candidate, as he combined the experience of a businessman and a television host, a showman. Strong cocktail! American democracy, in the sense of presidential elections, was used by the old elites of the United States as a formal and legitimate tool for coming to power. And revenge on the neocons!
Apparently, the old US elites, with the help of the FBI, made it impossible for the falsification of the elections in favor of Clinton, and, perhaps, the Clinton victory itself, to be impossible. For example, taking control of polling stations in the country and counting votes in troubled states. The FBI is the country's internal security service! The CIA is a foreign intelligence service, so on the territory of the US FBI itself has priority over the CIA. In any case, according to the law.
Clinton and Obama, concerned, apparently informed about the changes during the voting, so convincingly that Clinton canceled the holiday fireworks and unconditionally congratulated Trump on his victory. Perhaps for providing security guarantees and not prosecution under the law. This version is also supported by the fact that Trump was more aggressive during the voting: he declared violations during the voting, he threatened to challenge the election results, Clinton was silent.
It can be said that Donald Trump and the FBI defeated Hilary Clinton and the CIA in the November 8 elections. We can say that American democracy won the "world democracy." Therefore, one can hope that the national interests of the United States will no longer be sacrificed to the neocons' plans of "world democracy", which, incidentally, is surprisingly reminiscent of "world communism." Understanding that democracy is not only the voice of the people, but also the voice of the media, and control over the counting of votes.
20 January 2017 will be the inauguration of Donald Trump, and, in a sense, the old US elites behind him, and James Komi, who fulfilled the role of the midwife of the Trump presidency. Since Trump is not alone, the argument that the neocons in Washington will be able to ride him is not convincing. Trump's crushing victory in the election suggests that he has already told Obama his phrase from the rally: “You are fired!”
Trump, and his friends, came to power seriously and for a long time. Of course, they will not fulfill everything they promised, but will strive for it. The first thing they promise to do, according to Trump: "drain the Washington marsh." Then all his hangers-on, from Brussels to Kiev and Moscow, will remain without "swamp" handouts.
Information