Military Review

Pentagon: US will continue to deploy troops to Europe, regardless of the intentions of Trump

87
The Pentagon will continue to strengthen its position in Europe, as planned earlier, regardless of the intentions of the new US President Donald Trump, leads Military Informant statement by the representative office of Peter Cook.


Fighters tanks M1128 Mobile Gun System of the 4th squadron of the 2nd Cavalry Regiment of the U.S. Army based in Germany, November 2016.

The agency recalls that the victory of Trump, who in January will take over the presidential duties, caused serious concern in the EU over his statements about the ineffectiveness of NATO and that he questions the expediency of US membership in this organization.

Earlier, Washington planned to launch an additional brigade in Europe in February to bring the number on the continent to three. This plan, as is well known, should "increase the ability of Eastern Europe to defend against a possible attack from Russia."

“We are implementing plans, since they were created with our NATO allies. We will leave the next administration to talk about their political choices. We have one commander in chief at the moment, "
stated Cook.
Photos used:
http://military-informant.com
87 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. hirurg
    hirurg 12 November 2016 10: 20
    +19
    The Pentagon will continue to strengthen its position in Europe, as previously planned, regardless of the intentions of the new US President Donald trump, the Military informant quoted a statement from the agency’s representative Peter Cook.
    I heard that once Cook already ate ...
    It seems to me that Trump Cook is also ... After all, Cook is rushing across, openly is a challenge.
    1. Temples
      Temples 12 November 2016 10: 26
      +10
      Nah, Trump Cook won't eat. Too much shit in this cookie. laughing Just kick him out along with Kukov’s plans.

      Many American bureaucrats cannot understand how their train has left. They put on a clinician.
      This is indicative of how people-slime breaks off. They barked and yelled, but they made a mistake. Now fuck. Even the dust from the boots of the new owner will not be allowed to wipe. wassat

      Putin said - be independent gentlemen, and everything will be fine. Do not listen. Db.
      1. hirurg
        hirurg 12 November 2016 10: 31
        +4
        "for Pitsunda and for KUKan?" - This is the same as "fur inside", only faster. (72 meters) lol
        1. hrych
          hrych 12 November 2016 10: 36
          +5
          Trumpapam will take up his duties a little later, but for now, Barak ibn Hussein manages to play more am Here, after all, one still needs to have time to doler, and soon many will lose their jobs laughing Creatures and war can be unleashed, one must be vigilant am
          1. electrooleg
            electrooleg 13 November 2016 16: 24
            +1
            Quote: hrych
            Barack ibn Hussein


            Hangar. In fact, his name is Hangar. laughing
      2. dima-fesko
        dima-fesko 12 November 2016 16: 48
        +1
        Many American bureaucrats cannot understand how their train has left.

        Golden words comrade Temples!
      3. Asadullah
        Asadullah 12 November 2016 17: 45
        +1
        Just kick him out along with Kukov’s plans.


        Who is Peter Cook? This is the official voicing the permitted information on the activities of the US Defense Department. What is the US DoD? This is a structure whose leader is appointed by the President of the United States. That is, Cook will be voiced by what they say. If the new head of the department does not like Cook, then he can become the head of the local dining room.

        The main point is, is Trump against the deployment of American troops in Europe? I think that I do not mind at all if our European colleagues pay for services in the spirit of business partnership. This is Trump's hobbyhorse - "anything for your money." What have the Europeans done for the United States? But nothing, they just blather for free in the spirit of neocon politics, and even then, not entirely free of charge, at the media level they were and are being paid by Murdochs and Soros through their "non-governmental" funds. Whatever is real American money. The Europeans have not even signed a trade agreement. That is, the message of Trump's thought is extremely clear - pay.
      4. 210ox
        210ox 12 November 2016 19: 22
        +3
        And here, Vladimir, I don’t agree with you ... Trump is just the tail of the dog and not its head .. And, accordingly, the head will turn its tail ..
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 12 November 2016 22: 50
          0
          Trump has his own opinion and he is the head - no one will manage and will not be able to manage it.
    2. OLD FART
      OLD FART 12 November 2016 10: 29
      +5
      We are also getting ready and it doesn’t matter who the president is there .... We will unambiguously bring down the United States (or rather, the whole world’s usurious financial system)
      Russia has big plans, I'm right men ..? And we will do it sooner or later ....
      1. kapitan92
        kapitan92 12 November 2016 10: 40
        +11
        Quote: STARPER
        We are also getting ready and it doesn’t matter who the president is there .... We will unambiguously bring down the United States (or rather, the whole world’s usurious financial system)
        Russia has big plans, I'm right men ..? And we will do it sooner or later ....

        The fact that Russia has big plans, you are right, there is no dispute. Regarding, sooner or later, are you on the implementation of Russia's plans or on the "roll" of the US?
        We will catch up and overtake, we will overwhelm everyone, first of all with our "firm" ruble and ambitions !!! Hooray! fellow
      2. EvgNik
        EvgNik 12 November 2016 10: 55
        +6
        Quote: STARPER
        Russia has big plans, I'm right men ..

        Vitaly, plus for optimism. And as for bringing down ... I doubt it.
        1. OLD FART
          OLD FART 12 November 2016 11: 06
          +3
          Quote: EvgNik
          Quote: STARPER
          Russia has big plans, I'm right men ..

          Vitaly, plus for optimism. And as for bringing down ... I doubt it.

          "To bring down the USA" is figuratively ..... Let's say, now the situation, how do you like it all ...?
          Remember the screams "Trump is an agent of the Kremlin, etc." crying
          Brilliant information operation on the first level ...!
          The Russians are coming - this is no longer a horror story, but a fact! laughing
          Goodbye Obamych ... we will not forget you! Thank you for the revival of Russia!
          1. EvgNik
            EvgNik 12 November 2016 11: 21
            +2
            Quote: STARPER
            The Russians are coming - this is no longer a horror story, but a fact!

            Vitaly, I’m saying that you’re an optimist, but I doubt that we’re going somewhere.
            Do not watch "Made with us" at night - you will not fall asleep until morning, you will think - and how much has not been done.
            1. OLD FART
              OLD FART 12 November 2016 11: 29
              +7
              Quote: EvgNik
              Quote: STARPER
              The Russians are coming - this is no longer a horror story, but a fact!

              Vitaly, I’m saying that you’re an optimist, but I doubt that we’re going somewhere.
              Do not watch "Made with us" at night - you will not fall asleep until morning, you will think - and how much has not been done.

              I don't watch it and I just remember the Vremya program and newspapers ... Where the satellite 12345 was launched in small print, etc. And the cosmonauts at the orbital station changed, already dazzled in their eyes from their names ...
              I'm just sure that all this will come back ... And instead of the programs "let's get married .." and "let them talk" they will show good documentary films and the Russian Ballet, finally, performances of the classics ... I want it. It's just that! I feel sorry for our children .. They are growing consumers, stupid ..
              1. EvgNik
                EvgNik 12 November 2016 11: 57
                +1
                Quote: STARPER
                I'm just sure that all this will come back ..

                I'm not sure, I knowthat will return, it is a pity that we will be gone.
              2. DmitryK
                DmitryK 12 November 2016 12: 04
                +4
                It’s a pity, of course, for your children if you raised them dumb, and even consumers. I have handsome men, they study perfectly, go in for sports, go to the theater, like to watch dock movies. Here are indifferent to ballet ....
                1. OLD FART
                  OLD FART 12 November 2016 12: 55
                  +1
                  Quote: DmitryK
                  Here are indifferent to ballet ....

                  And ballet is a classic of the Russian soul ... Mine really doesn’t like it either ... bully But you need to forcibly drive and select mobile phones .. angry
              3. Cat
                Cat 12 November 2016 12: 13
                +2
                Well, "Old" turned down, I'd rather go to the opera than as your generation in 1991 and 1993 watched ballet on TV when the country was falling apart.
                No offence. I mean this to a generation, and not to you personally.
                The realization that we lost in the 90s came to me personally in the 93s when I spoke with a participant in the events of the XNUMXrd.
                And about the means "mass-fool" is not all that bad. Just last week, I was surprised by my own daughter (14 years old) who "rooted" for Trump against Clinton. At the same time, I more than once or twice dropped my hands and broke spears with her "Disney" and "Ramstein". The fact that I am not tolerant has already eaten into my consciousness completely and irrevocably. And then the desire to go to the production of "Catherine the Great" and interest in history started. Not everything is so bad with the young generation, no need to feel sorry for him, he must be brought up, including by personal example.
                1. OLD FART
                  OLD FART 12 November 2016 13: 00
                  +2
                  Quote: Kotischa
                  Well, "Old" turned down, I'd rather go to the opera than as your generation in 1991 and 1993 watched ballet on TV when the country was falling apart.

                  The normal ballet was ..)))
                  Beautiful and what kind of music. Just listen!

                  Now this is shown for big money and not by the media ..
          2. Strength
            Strength 12 November 2016 13: 51
            0
            "Blast the USA" or "Blast the USA" - rather the second.
          3. Simpsonian
            Simpsonian 12 November 2016 14: 11
            +1
            these two months are very dangerous, can spoil near and in Syria itself in the end
      3. Alf
        Alf 12 November 2016 16: 36
        +2
        Quote: STARPER
        .USA will bring down unambiguously (or rather, this whole usurious financial system worldwide)

        Who will bring down? The one who has kids like sand and money in the West?
        Quote: STARPER
        Russia has big plans,

        In addition to plans, opportunities are also needed, but with this so far it is not very. Even so many hats are not stocked.
    3. vovanpain
      vovanpain 12 November 2016 10: 41
      +17
      We have one Supreme Commander at the moment, ”Cook said.

      But the cat smells, whose meat is eaten, he senses that in two months, together with his current boss Carter, he will get a good kick, that’s crying. wink
    4. Cat
      Cat 12 November 2016 10: 45
      +4
      Smoke without fire does not happen!
      How not to see a military coup in the United States, in old age?
      1. Was mammoth
        Was mammoth 12 November 2016 11: 19
        +2
        Quote: Kotischa
        How not to see a military coup in the United States, in old age?

        There is a more proven method in accordance with their traditions - sniper rifle.
        1. Cat
          Cat 12 November 2016 11: 54
          +2
          Not always. Lincoln was "removed" from the pistol. love
          The bottom line is one "rat" cook "scratches on its spine"! bully
      2. von_Tilsit
        von_Tilsit 12 November 2016 14: 11
        +1
        "There is no smoke without fire!
        How not to see a military coup in the United States, in old age? "

        This has not happened in the history of the United States. The Americans are pretty closely watching the army, in which case both the Marine Corps and the National Guard can act as a counterweight, and it, by the way, consists of war veterans, so ...))
    5. cariperpaint
      cariperpaint 12 November 2016 11: 21
      0
      and what is he wrong about? Tram is not the president yet. Obama will order then the transfer is minimized
    6. Max spenser
      Max spenser 12 November 2016 18: 47
      0
      If you take into account that KUKOM was Kennedy, then yes .... Trump has a high chance of catching a bullet. Clinton is capable of this, she has three more months left
  2. Smog
    Smog 12 November 2016 10: 22
    +3
    The Pentagon will continue to strengthen its position in Europe, as previously planned, regardless of the intentions of the new US President Donald trump, the Military informant quoted a statement from the agency’s representative Peter Cook.

    Well, there are still two months. Of course strengthen. And Cook is resigned, anyway.
    But why did the Aborigines ate Cook?
    For which - it is not clear - science is silent.
  3. andron-30
    andron-30 12 November 2016 10: 29
    0
    Well, who would have doubted sshka always and in everything were ???? Well, let's say no, just suppose I don’t even want to think about that ASS
  4. 73bor
    73bor 12 November 2016 10: 30
    0
    Yes, let it be that we have one hell of a thing closer to the troops to transfer and to them from across the ocean to drag, I remember for the operation "Desert Storm" the whole year the troops drove, well, so we are not Iraq! And as soon as Trump cuts military spending (if only he cuts it), then it will all end there.
    1. just exp
      just exp 12 November 2016 10: 32
      0
      Yes, there is just Trump asking - why, in the US, the president is no one at all?
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 12 November 2016 10: 45
        +6
        Quote: just EXPL
        Yes, there is just Trump asking - why, in the US, the president is no one at all?

        - in a couple of months, maybe he’ll ask
        - while Trump is really "nobody" for the Pentagon
        - All correctly said comrade:

        We are implementing the plans since they were created with our NATO allies. We will leave the next administration to talk about their political choice. We have one Supreme Commander at the moment.
        1. Simpsonian
          Simpsonian 12 November 2016 13: 36
          0
          not "nobody" but a US citizen and future "popularly elected" president.

          and will not ask, but simply send to the tribunal ...
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 12 November 2016 13: 39
            +3
            Quote: Simpsonian
            not "nobody" but a US citizen and future "popularly elected" president

            - keyword "future"
            - and in the present - just an ordinary citizen
            - as I understand it, an ordinary US citizen does not have the power to steer the Pentagon
            - that's why "nobody". Exactly in this sense, don't be so stupid ...

            Quote: Simpsonian
            not ask, but just send to the tribunal

            - showdown will show (s) yes
            1. Simpsonian
              Simpsonian 12 November 2016 14: 06
              0
              keyword "chosen" and "by the people"
              in the present - the "future president" is simply the rank and file of all the others who are not senators.

              are you being stupid ... persistently
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 12 November 2016 14: 09
                +2
                Mdja ...

                Quote: Simpsonian
                keyword "chosen" and "by the people"

                - did not take office => not yet president => The Pentagon (and no one in general) obeys him
                - refute if there is enough tymah wassat

                PS: you will poke yourself. With your finger. In the ass. Beat? wink
                1. Simpsonian
                  Simpsonian 12 November 2016 20: 33
                  0
                  Elected - the future president is already, accepts affairs, intelligence is already being reported to him,
                  to whom else, including you, is being reported?

                  The Pentagon is doing what the prez says to him, which is 2 months away. The president selected must be respected, and not make such statements.

                  what, bucks? lick yourself somewhere nearby next ...
        2. Simpsonian
          Simpsonian 12 November 2016 13: 39
          0
          the choice and voice of the people must be respected, the people themselves can also recall this, which by the way were tired of the processions of fans of one former first and now manic lady, whose husband, after something in the oral office, then falsely swore the Bible in an American court ...
          1. Simpsonian
            Simpsonian 12 November 2016 14: 07
            0
            and the non-president during his inauguration swore with a smile the devil, and with the wrong hand ...
          2. Lelek
            Lelek 12 November 2016 17: 55
            +1
            Quote: Simpsonian
            a manic lady whose husband, after something in the oral office, then falsely swore the Bible in an American court ..


            And now he continues to do this, such is nature (or nature):
  5. Damir
    Damir 12 November 2016 10: 30
    0
    regardless of the intentions of the new president

    I feel that it is not long for him to represent something as a representative ... and the Pentagon too ... it seems we call it the good old word "cleaning" ...
    1. 97110
      97110 12 November 2016 11: 08
      +1
      Quote: Damir
      I feel that it is not long for him to represent something as a representative ... and the Pentagon too ... it seems we call it the good old word "cleaning" ...

      Well, if the "chuyka" works ... Mine tells you that it's time for you to turn on the lip-sewing machine. Your "reliability", if elected, promised the electorate to increase military spending. And make the allies fork out. By the way. Are you hoping that this money will go to fight ISIS? So it is enough to cut off the residual funding.
      1. Damir
        Damir 12 November 2016 11: 34
        0
        military spending, military spending, and openly declare to the newly elected that his orders are not orders yet ... "regardless of opinions" ... January will come ... more precisely, February and opinion will become very dependent ... and about Assad already it is said that there will be no fight against him ... and there will be a fight against ISIS ... and in general Trump still has to live before the inauguration ...
  6. Rostislav
    Rostislav 12 November 2016 10: 33
    +1
    Judging by this statement, Mr. Cook is planning to retire.
    1. thinker
      thinker 12 November 2016 11: 08
      +3
      Already a classic!
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 12 November 2016 22: 54
        0
        Most likely, Trump after changing the presidential administration will also change the entire Pentagon leadership.
  7. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 12 November 2016 10: 34
    +5
    This is sta-no-it-int-res-no ... A ... A ... A ... A ... laughing
    In fact, what has been turning around in the language for a long time is being asked outside - the American President is a nominal figure yes And the country is really ruled by someone else. And even if the archaic election system does not lead to the desired results, there are other ways. The path of D.F. Kennedy, the path of Nixon, and if this does not work, then you can simply ignore it, that is, the path of the Pentagon winked It is possible and softer - lobbying for interests in Congress and the Senate. winked
    Alas, this is a reality that actually exists independently of the desires and aspirations of neither the American President nor many other sober-minded people ....
    1. fif21
      fif21 12 November 2016 10: 54
      +1
      Quote: Rurikovich
      the american president is a figure nominal
      Someone thought that the President of the Russian Federation was a nominal figure! And where are these wiseacres now? wassat
      1. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 12 November 2016 11: 03
        0
        Quote: fif21
        Someone thought that the President of the Russian Federation was a nominal figure! And where are these wiseacres now?

        Do not compare incomparable. What happened around EBN does not mean what is happening around GDP. Putin really rules the state, he still has a lot of things to do to resolve the remnants of what accumulated during the EBN. That which has been rooted for ten years in a year cannot be raked. Therefore, it may seem to some that GDP is a nominal figure, which is mistaken in itself. For clans that still did not exist a generation cannot be indestructible. And according to one canon, more than one generation lives, because whoever doesn’t come to power, he still can’t change the system. And if he tries, then read in my first post. wink
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 12 November 2016 13: 23
      +3
      "And the country is really ruled by someone else." ////

      These are congressmen and senators. In both houses, the majority are Republicans.
      The Americans clearly voted to change the ruling party - the Democrats.
  8. K-50
    K-50 12 November 2016 10: 36
    +2
    The Pentagon will continue to strengthen its position in Europe, as previously planned, regardless of the intentions of the new US President Donald trump

    Of course, we must strengthen our occupation regime so that no one could have their own opinion and point of view, so that it would be easier to tilt everyone under their own breath. yes
  9. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 12 November 2016 10: 37
    +4
    statement by the representative office of Peter Cook.

    It seems that all those who are against Trump hope that he will not be in the presidency. On the one hand, it suggests thoughts of something that we do not yet know. And on the other hand, after the inauguration, these clerks will fly like leaves from poplar.
  10. japs
    japs 12 November 2016 10: 48
    +5
    I love to read the comments. Lord! Trump is a billionaire. Does this tell you something? If not, continue the song about the retirement of a professional military. Trump will simply put his people in key positions. It's all. Further, everything is according to the plans of Mr. Allen Dulles.
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 12 November 2016 11: 05
      +3
      Trump will simply put on the key positions of his people

      Thank you for opening your eyes to us not reasonable. And we thought that he would not put his people, but from the side. Interestingly, they thought for a long time to write this?
  11. EvgNik
    EvgNik 12 November 2016 10: 49
    0
    This plan, as you know, should "increase the ability of Eastern Europe to defend against a possible attack from Russia"

    This plan should shift the priorities of the missile strike from the states towards Europe. So, not only our president has "cunning plans".
  12. fif21
    fif21 12 November 2016 10: 51
    +1
    The head of the Pentagon will be a woman. For Europe, a freebie is over - the United States will pay for their umbrella. But Europe has a choice - peace, friendship, chewing gum with Russia or an increase in military spending on the illusory threat from Russia. hi
    1. 97110
      97110 12 November 2016 11: 26
      0
      Quote: fif21
      But Europe has a choice - peace, friendship, chewing gum with Russia

      Such a choice would be made twice in the reported 2 centuries - in 1815 and in 1945. And they did not like this choice both times. Time after time, fate takes Russia by the scruff of its neck and pokes its nose to the East. Her rulers all climb into this thieves raspberry in a swamp. Why does Russia need peace, friendship and chewing gum with these terpils, which Arabcha will trample tomorrow? It is necessary to put seven stakes of barbed wire and cover it with a minefield from Perekop to Rybachy. And to communicate with them on tyrnet, they say, what the Ukrainians have? Still alive? Oh well.
      1. your1970
        your1970 12 November 2016 13: 53
        0
        How are you with geography? "Time after time, fate takes Russia by the scruff of the neck and pokes its nose to the East".-Europe is actually in the West request request request
        1. 97110
          97110 12 November 2016 17: 14
          0
          Quote: your1970
          How is your geography? "Time after time fate takes Russia by the scruff of its neck and pokes its nose at the East."

          Read as many times as you need to remember about the Russian Far East and missed prospects there. To California inclusive. Have you heard of Fort Ross? How are you with geography? Or is Europe the center of the universe, and Amsterdam the axis of its rotation?
  13. andron-30
    andron-30 12 November 2016 10: 58
    0
    this is how you at least break your forehead, "but we will still fight world terrorism", "fighters" so-so they would have "ducks" in the hospital to bring them to the WAR, most likely they will send them. oh yes why, your NATO corpses will not be buried by anyone in Iraq.
  14. masiya
    masiya 12 November 2016 11: 01
    +2
    Let them drag their brash, but more ... there will be more trophies, because this day will come !!!!
  15. jovanni
    jovanni 12 November 2016 11: 03
    0
    It will begin now! They will try to have time to shit like that until January, so that later they have to rake shit for a long time. And Trump and us ....
  16. egor-kz
    egor-kz 12 November 2016 11: 16
    +2
    This whole procedure with the transfer of the military contingent resembles a "grandmother's boobies", she may have had gorgeous breasts, but when it was she herself does not remember exactly. If a little more serious, then there is zero sense in these re-rolls. Because if we assume, God forbid, some kind of conflict, then the size of the US contingent near our borders will not matter. Well, it turns out that if it is a platoon, the Americans will say like "... well, if there were at least a brigade, then we might have fit in, otherwise ... no, we won't." Nonsense. This is an attempt to "tug at the mustache" of Russia, and at the same time a demonstration to all their mongrels that they say, here we are taking care of you here.
  17. koshmarik
    koshmarik 12 November 2016 11: 22
    +1
    At the time of his military youth, he came to the Kiev garrison lip. So that the "guests" of the establishment would not be bored, its management brought several cars of sand. On even days we drove him to the opposite corner of the yard, on odd days we returned him to his original place. The US Supreme Commander-in-Chief is very reminiscent of the head of the guardhouse, and the generals of her guard. I think that Trump will not tolerate such a weapon freebie for the EU and will order the return of both soldiers and equipment back.
    1. 97110
      97110 12 November 2016 11: 43
      +2
      Quote: koshmarik
      Think trump

      will lease this "freebie" to Europeans. Payment before the first banking day of the month. Delay in payments is penalized by an increase in the leased contingent in the department for each day of delay. Rent = direct costs of maintaining the leased contingent + 100% management fee + 100% commitment fee + 35% profit of the lessor. Just business, nothing personal.
  18. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 November 2016 11: 43
    0
    Do they still count on December 19th? That, having listened to the Maidan calls from Amer’s streets, the electors WILL NOT SELECT Trump? It is unlikely. But then we stocked up with popcorn. laughing
  19. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 12 November 2016 11: 46
    0
    Is it a striker or a tank destroyer? Yes, it’s a wheeled overturner, and a Papuan racer. And such declarations simply confirm at least dual power in the USA-pop, but to hell ...
  20. SG11
    SG11 12 November 2016 11: 50
    0
    as if Trump did not repeat Kennedy’s fate
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 12 November 2016 13: 26
      +1
      Until recently, this was said about Obama.
      1. SG11
        SG11 12 November 2016 14: 51
        0
        please remind - in connection with what? Obama was not going to change the political course
  21. Disorder
    Disorder 12 November 2016 12: 05
    0
    “We are implementing plans, since they were created with our NATO allies. We will leave the next administration to talk about their political choices. We have one commander in chief at the moment, "

    All this Trump talk about the inefficiency of NATO and the advisability of US membership in it have a financial basis. He is not going to either disperse NATO or interrupt the US membership in it, he wants to save money at the expense of the allies. In the EU, it was not in vain that they began to fuss - a freebie could end.
    So some in the Pentagon can row for such a joke - they will gobble up by the rules of business.
  22. valent45
    valent45 12 November 2016 12: 14
    0
    This will be until the head of the Pentagon is replaced. And we'll see. And they’ll eat Cook, no doubt about it!
  23. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 12 November 2016 12: 18
    0
    “We are implementing the plans, as they were created with our NATO allies. We will leave the next administration to talk about their political choice. We have one Supreme Commander at the moment, ”Cook said.

    Once the aborigines ate one Cook, no matter how "they ate" it, but not the aborigines! So the NATO members do not abandon their plans for a war on the European continent with the help of Euromass and a limited American contingent. But when he smells really fried in Europe, they will eat not only Cook, but also those who are behind him! soldier
  24. Leonid Har
    Leonid Har 12 November 2016 12: 32
    +1
    It would be nice to transfer our Marine Corps brigade to Cuba for joint exercises in the Caribbean. To pull up there "Admiral Kuznetsov" and "Peter the Great", nuclear submarines and see how NATO and the United States howl.
    1. Strength
      Strength 12 November 2016 13: 59
      0
      Well, if Kuzyu then yes. World War I will be repeated.
  25. von_Tilsit
    von_Tilsit 12 November 2016 14: 16
    0
    "Yes, let it be that we have to move the troops closer to us and drag them from across the ocean, I remember the troops drove for Operation Desert Storm for a whole year, well, so we are not Iraq! And as soon as Trump will cut military spending (if only cuts) then it will end there. "

    Hochma is that he will not cut! Obama’s medical reform will definitely be curtailed and canceled, and no one will cut back the military budget in the current conditions of confrontation with Russia.
  26. Zomanus
    Zomanus 12 November 2016 14: 45
    0
    Trump, if he takes office, is only from January, practically from February.
    So Obama with his company can still do us dirty tricks ...
  27. Evil 55
    Evil 55 12 November 2016 15: 26
    0
    Obama finished writing, Blinton finished playing, and this wonderful woodpecker, extra .. will agree ...
  28. kazak08
    kazak08 12 November 2016 17: 16
    0
    I’m more interested in the question of how quickly our Judas who worked for the good of these little people who leave, find themselves in a hole with crap, because to be objective, this is the team that started working with Gorbaty and then continued with Boryan and the Vovansins are also friends with them Vasya Vasya, oh I wonder what will happen what will happen?
  29. unsinkable
    unsinkable 12 November 2016 18: 20
    0
    Uncle Trump can make the kirdyk presumptuous of the Pontagonists only because they ignored the fact of his assumption of the post of commander in chief. Confirmation that he notes all the negativity in his direction is his unwillingness to speak with politicians who have identified themselves as his opponents.
  30. samuil60
    samuil60 12 November 2016 21: 06
    0
    Oh how! The president is no longer a decree for them. Cool...
  31. shinobi
    shinobi 13 November 2016 01: 11
    0
    But doesn’t he take a lot on himself? Open disobedience, serious claim. Tipo, we are the power.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 13 November 2016 01: 19
      +1
      Quote: shinobi
      Open disobedience, serious bid

      - to whom, is it interesting?
      - Trump? So he is not the president yet. There Obama is still the president, and will be him until January, EMNIP.
  32. Mentat
    Mentat 14 November 2016 10: 37
    0
    Quote: Vadim237
    Trump has his own opinion and he is the head - no one will manage and will not be able to manage it.

    Of course, Trump is not on his own, he represents a group of people, including in the army, about which he himself spoke, who have developed a consolidated position and will promote it. That some bureaucrats blather there, none of them care, they have financial, administrative and political resources (otherwise Trump would not even have arisen on the horizon) that they will use.