One hundred days before the reflection of the "Russian threat"

57
British "former" choir began talking about the imminent Russian invasion of Europe. Former head of the British Royal Air Force Michael Graydon worried: would the Americans not leave NATO after the victory of Trump? If left, Putin will take advantage of this. Mr. Shirreff, who previously worked as deputy supreme commander of the NATO Joint Armed Forces in Europe and wrote a book about the nuclear war between the Russians and the Baltic States, agrees with Graydon.

One hundred days before the reflection of the "Russian threat"




What happens if Donald Trump refuses NATO? The threat of war with Russia - that's what!

Three former British generals, and with him the admiral, reported that the UK and Europe should heed their warnings. Otherwise, the “Russian invasion” is inevitable.

He writes about it "Daily Mail".

Sir Michael Graydon, former head of the British Royal Air Force, said that without the US, NATO would not be strong enough to protect Eastern Europe. This man is sure: Trump quite seriously said before the elections that the NATO member states should pay America for their security. Therefore, Europe should think. There are real concerns about the future of NATO. "If the US leaves NATO, it will be an absolute catastrophe, which Vladimir Putin wants exactly." The former military leader called for a "firm position" on the Baltic Sea. The United States there will be very missed.

General Richard Shirreff, who worked as deputy supreme commander-in-chief of the Joint NATO Forces in Europe until 2014, echoes his military counterpart, although he expresses hopes for Mr. Trump’s sanity.

Schirreff expects to hear from Trump a different rhetoric, not the one that took place before the election. Trump must make a “very sober and serious statement” that if “any questions” arise about an attack on a NATO member, then the United States, led by Trump, “without any hesitation” will come to the defense of the attacked country. Anything that was “less than this” would become “really bad the news for NATO. "

The publication reminds that in one of his books Mr. Shirreff depicted a nuclear war with Russia, which in 2017 year invaded the Baltic countries.

The newspaper leads and other opinions.

Lord Dannatt, the former chief of staff of the armed forces, does not share Shirreff’s hopes and is convinced that Mr. Trump’s election statements should be taken seriously.

According to him, if the US leaves NATO, this alliance will cease to exist.

Julian Lewis, chairman of the House of Commons Defense Committee, told the Daily Mail that Trump’s rule could put Europe in a “catastrophically weakened position.”

Lord West, a former security minister, believes that Trump will force "all of Europe to spend more" on defense.

Also, the publication reminds that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg congratulated Mr. Trump on his victory in the election, noting that he “with impatience” is waiting to start working with Trump on “strengthening NATO, keeping Europe and America safe”.

But Richard Kemp, who commanded the troops in Afghanistan, believes that the world will fear Mr. Trump. According to him, Trump will oppose Putin for the sake of showing that he will not bow to Putin. And people "will be afraid of him."

There is another interesting opinion on this. He was also conveyed to readers by the newspaper. "Daily Mail".

And it is also expressed by the "former."

Donald Trump must demonstrate action against Russian aggression within 100 days after assuming office, said former NATO head Anders Fogh Rasmussen (was the organization's general secretary in 2009-2014 years).

According to him, the elected president of the United States must show "strength" because Russian President Vladimir Putin "respects only a firm hand."

Mr Rasmussen urged the United States to increase support for NATO and create military bases to counter "Russian aggression against NATO states," as well as defend Ukraine.

Rasmussen noted that the Baltic countries and Ukraine are "close friends of the United States." He added: “Neglecting their interests will have far-reaching consequences and will mark the beginning of the end of the [global] system headed by the United States.”

And another opinion from Europe about Trump and defense issues, published in the third article "Daily Mail".

The election of Donald Trump has caused a mass of responses and “warnings” that Europe will not always be able to rely on American protection. The head of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, in particular, has already expressed "concern." According to him, a “commonality” of interests in defense matters is required.

Juncker says: “We need more security in Europe, and I mean more than one anti-terrorism struggle.”

According to Juncker, a different way of “organizing European defense” is needed.

“Regardless of the outcome of elections in the United States, Americans will not always monitor the security of Europe. We have to provide it ourselves, ”the politician believes. That is why the continent needs a “new approach” to the creation of a “European defense community ... including a European army.”

With Juncker solidarity in Germany: the then Minister of Defense Ursula von der Lyayen remained, in her words, in "deep shock" after the victory of Trump. She remembers that the newly elected president had previously challenged the NATO Mutual Defense Pact.

Mrs. von der Lyayen said that the continent must be ready to stand up for itself. She said that she should “invest” funds “in the modernization of European security.”

But British Defense Secretary Michael Fallon debunked the idea of ​​creating a common European army. Last month, he said that London continues to "oppose any new military structure that will generate a duplicate layer of command and control."

In general, we note, Europe not only does not welcome the election of Mr. Trump (by the way, not yet formally completed) to the US presidency, but even in some way panics, fearing “Russian aggression” and the openness of the EU members with all the power of NATO. After all, Trump made it clear before the elections that the United States will be ready to defend only those who will pay for the defense as it should be.

The excitement of European politicians about defense reached such a strong degree that even a special meeting was scheduled in the capital of Belgium. On November 13, the foreign ministers of the EU member states are to meet there. The idea came from Germany.

There is only one hope in Europe - that Trump will show Putin "power."

Trump was taken for a hundred days.

We'll see.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      12 November 2016 07: 28
      Why geyevrope spread such rumors about Russia. Who is interested in this.
      1. +1
        12 November 2016 13: 16
        Mr. agrees with Mr. Shirreff


        Mr. Shiref should be advised a good narcologist, if the case is difficult then change the dragdiller.
      2. +7
        12 November 2016 18: 41
        Now I will explain why.
        Look here. Now it does not matter what Trump does. Collapse NATO, or force the rest to fork out.
        By the condition of the problem, we have:
        1. Screams that Russia will attack the EU in 100 days.
        2. Only NATO is able to stop Putin's "vicious underfed bears"
        3. Shouts of creating a single EU army.
        We have in fact:
        1. Russia is not going to fight the EU. Even with the Poles. Even with the Balts.
        Thus, shouting about the imminent attack of Russia is a win-win option.
        Since after 100 days it will allow you to change the record: and shout about:
        1. Only WE have restrained Putin
        2. We need even more security.
        3. We showed our unity and commitment to democratic values ​​and Putin was scared.
        That's all.
        1. 0
          12 November 2016 19: 06
          Quote: Skeptic Self-taught
          ...
          Thus, shouting about the imminent attack of Russia is a win-win
          ...

          good
    2. 0
      12 November 2016 18: 12
      Article
      ... one hundred days.
      Until the order to dissolve NATO ... It could be laughing
      1. +1
        14 November 2016 18: 20
        Quote: GYGOLA
        Until the order to dissolve NATO ... It could be

        It’s unlikely that you can imagine how many people there are feeding on puffed balloons with the inscription Evil Russia, how many generals without armies receive a salary, not counting the lower-level command personnel, plus supplies (they also have their own gesheftik - they just sit in outsourcing companies and others). Hundreds of thousands of people write off for each of 10 bucks there will be millions, and write off 1000 and even on equipment and fuel there will be billion. bully
  2. +9
    12 November 2016 06: 51
    What Trump said was intended for voters, the middle class. They generally do not give a damn about NATO, Russia, etc. The main thing would be to earn money, the tax service would not fiddle and there was a cozy courtyard. What he would do was do the same as his predecessors, nothing will change here. He will sign papers that are born in the minds of others ..
    1. +1
      12 November 2016 07: 17
      So one of the main tasks of the president is not to sign papers born in the wrong "minds"
      1. 0
        12 November 2016 17: 43
        So one of the main tasks of the president is not to sign papers born in the wrong "minds"
        Even Putin cannot always afford it, and in the west, where the president is a purely nominal post of state administrator who does not decide anything on his own, this is normal practice.
    2. 0
      12 November 2016 18: 01
      the possibility of impeaching Trump and replacing him with Pence surfaced. All 4 g will be traded and milked for concessions World and their (USA) corporations
  3. +7
    12 November 2016 06: 54
    composing a book about a nuclear war between Russians and Baltic.

    And what, the Baltic states possess nuclear weapons? I hear it for the first time. The book is probably from a series of unscientific science fiction. So they moan that Russia will capture them in 2-3 days, and then suddenly a nuclear war. Then maybe the West should not intervene? Will the Baltic States cope with us?
  4. +4
    12 November 2016 07: 08
    Finally, the geyropeysky dogs voiced to the whole world that they can bark at Russia only from behind the United States.
  5. +3
    12 November 2016 07: 09
    Well, a pure kindergarten, and even Trump is indicated
    1. +2
      12 November 2016 07: 26
      He, like previous preziks, will always be indicated.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      12 November 2016 13: 30
      Quote: McLooka-MacLeod
      Well, a pure kindergarten, and even Trump is indicated

      if kindergarten. you can even agree with the children, they understand the words. these are more like street teen gangs. at the peak of the teenage crisis.
  6. +1
    12 November 2016 07: 13
    Stupid people are scaring themselves. But on the other hand, they need to somehow justify the alliance, because now it may not be controlled, puppets are sitting there. So they can’t think, they need to indicate the direction. And some states indicated beyond the puddle.
    And the terms were interesting and set 100 days. Nothing will change, now America will be put on the rails of extortion and Europe will pay "Tribute for 12 years."
  7. +2
    12 November 2016 07: 13
    But there were times when some even believed in their nonsense, one figure with a cry - * RUSSIAN GO * even jumped out the window. And today, * crowed and there at least do not dawn *. It was boring and it seemed like they said the obligatory program, knowing that all the same, in reality, nothing threatens them, but the situation obliges us. Since nobody jumps in the windows, it means everyone is lying.
    1. +2
      12 November 2016 10: 16
      It turns out that Forrestal really believed in his words "The Russians are coming" if he was smart enough to jump out the window wink
  8. 0
    12 November 2016 07: 13
    C 1946 scare, not tired?
  9. cap
    +2
    12 November 2016 07: 16
    "If the United States leaves NATO, it will be an absolute disaster, which Vladimir Putin just wants." The former commander called for a “firm stance” on the Baltic Sea. The US will be sorely missed there.

    The question is, what should the United States do in the Baltic Sea?
    We look at the map, there are no colonies there, sovereign sprats themselves with a mustache, which Trump is trying to say.
    The arithmetic is simple, all Baltic sprats are equal in value to 1 tank.
    That something like this.
  10. +4
    12 November 2016 07: 23
    All these lords sirs admirals generals seem to be extremely ignorant people. The state of Russia and its military doctrine, in any case at the moment, allows for a difficult but effective defense. Pure pragmatism - we would have to master our own, bring them in proper form, pull the people out of poverty, and Russia does not have time to rob the conquered territories. The FSA, on the contrary, has a need to include robberies of new vassals in its orbit, otherwise they cannot survive. So it turns out that the cap is lit on the thief. They want to attack Russia, but it’s terrible to die in a nuclear fire. Here they howl together in chorus for the new master, prepare his psyche for confrontation, and at the same time prepare people to tighten their belts for military needs, which are not there. Quote from S. Lavrov.
    1. 0
      12 November 2016 10: 19
      Quote: St. Propulsion
      All these lords sirs admirals generals seem to be extremely ignorant people.

      Or maybe on the contrary, they know the real state of affairs, and therefore they understand that in order to either knock out the babos or build a career, you just need to lie about the Russians, because they are not going to attack anyone, which means they’ll give a ride
      Quote: St. Propulsion
      Pure pragmatism - we would have to master our own, bring them in proper form, pull people out of poverty, and Russia does not have time to rob the conquered territories.

      But try to convey this to Western minds wink But you will not succeed, because there is such a thing as censorship in the "democratic" Western media, and it works brilliantly Yes
  11. +5
    12 November 2016 07: 34
    Invasion? What for? Is it possible to recapture Abramovich! Really a campaign for women. Nothing worse than British women.
  12. +1
    12 November 2016 07: 42
    Over the past year and a half, while reading the news, I get the feeling that the sectors on the Matrix hard drive that are responsible for the Western countries are damaged. Whatever the day is a glitch or a glitch. Matrix, infection, start the checkdisk already, until all the hard covers are covered!
  13. +1
    12 November 2016 07: 43
    composing a book about a nuclear war between Russians and Baltic.

    Oh damn it! Spratoedy became nuclear powers ?!
    1. Cat
      0
      12 November 2016 11: 12
      They published new labels "radioactive danger" at the expense of the budget. Sha we are afraid!
  14. 0
    12 November 2016 07: 45
    Obama started this way with a reboot.
    1. 0
      12 November 2016 19: 52
      With overload .....
  15. 0
    12 November 2016 07: 56
    Otherwise, the "Russian invasion" is inevitable.
    About it writes "Daily Mail".

    Sleep and see the invasion. Sick nation and, campaign, for a long time. bully
  16. 0
    12 November 2016 08: 25
    What, fluttered, aspids? Did they start pissing boiling water at the torture? Trumpych is a dogmatic person, you will spend your money on YOUR defense. And it is right. This is just the beginning. Trumpych he is so unpredictable and that he still throws you, no one knows. But actually, get ready for a big change. Within 100 days.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +1
    12 November 2016 08: 33
    (Lord West, the former secretary of security, believes Trump will force “all of Europe to spend more” on defense.)

    Bravo, Mr. West! You guessed. Bingo! Therefore, direct negotiations with Russia will cost the EU less than useless huge expenses for all your military preparations. To do this, NATO needs to retire to the position of 1991 and become fearful.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. 0
    12 November 2016 09: 40
    What are they crazy about ?! Oh, no one, and Russia will definitely not attack England, if the British themselves do not run into
    1. 0
      12 November 2016 17: 56
      if the British themselves do not run up
      If one of the NATO members, no matter who, runs up, then a blow will follow all NATO countries. This is officially recorded in the military doctrine of Russia. Everyone knows this, and it won’t work out.
      1. 0
        12 November 2016 19: 23
        So I doubt very much that NATO will start fighting with Russia over some kind of Estonia or Latvia. They even shot a documentary in which they openly say that they will not start a war with the Russians over a country whose entire population is smaller than the population of London.
        1. +1
          12 November 2016 23: 49
          Just all sorts of Estonia and Latvia, they only know how to bark, and are waiting for the role of policemen, as with the Germans. Here they would have turned around, already passed. Nobody will give them such an opportunity.
          1. 0
            13 November 2016 15: 59
            Policemen will be disappointed with rocket attacks on their cities, including tactical nuclear weapons
  20. +1
    12 November 2016 11: 01
    about the imminent Russian invasion of Europe.

    They have already overslept - Russians in Europe. In the next two years, elections in France and Germany will show that Washington’s current singers are not needed in these countries. I hope that Europe will finally become independent and think about its future.
  21. +1
    12 November 2016 13: 34
    And after such statements, these monkeys continue to howl over the Russian threat ?! "The sleep of reason gives rise to monsters" - apparently the West has been sleeping for a long time, since its monsters have acquired such a form. While the West awaits the Russian threat, the Arabs and immigrants from Africa have long been conquering it without armies or fighting.
    1. +2
      12 November 2016 17: 52
      Arabs and natives of Africa have long been conquering it without armies and military operations
      According to the late Yasser Arafat, the worst weapon against Europeans is the womb of an Arab woman. And as you can see, it works flawlessly.
  22. 0
    12 November 2016 14: 06
    Quite a fart broke through among the geyropeytsev ...
  23. +1
    12 November 2016 14: 37
    British "former" choir began talking about the imminent Russian invasion of Europe. Former head of the British Royal Air Force Michael Graydon worried: would the Americans not leave NATO after the victory of Trump?

    Quite a natural question "Why do we need this, what benefit will we get?"
    Just LGBT batons to drive? request No. So get tired quickly. Then feed all the parasites, which are now full of geyropa? Do we need it?
    No more privileges and prospects are invented. request
  24. 0
    12 November 2016 15: 21
    The old senility scare the whole world and themselves ... The question is, why the hell are we foreign countries when there are enough of our problems.
  25. 0
    12 November 2016 17: 49
    Quote: Delink
    Yes, and interesting terms set 100 days

    I remember that once there was already one reform program "100 days". How it ended, probably all who are older remember, and more specifically, nothing.
  26. 0
    12 November 2016 17: 51
    what kind of war, what are they talking about, why do we need their NATO, fagots to drive something there. laughing
  27. +1
    12 November 2016 19: 32
    Three former British generals, and with him the admiral, reported that the UK and Europe should heed their warnings. Otherwise, the “Russian invasion” is inevitable.

    Late to listen. Already a mess came to the headquarters of the ZVO. To which country. By the way, nobody really wants to go to Britain. Damp ...
  28. +3
    12 November 2016 19: 38
    Did I remember a song from the 90s alone?
    One hundred days before the order
    He was a friend from class
    Soldiers are waiting for sweet dreams
    Waiting for the girls (small British) boys (Pskov, Ryazan, well, and everyone else too).
  29. 0
    12 November 2016 19: 59
    Three former British generals, and with him the admiral, reported that the UK and Europe should heed their warnings. Otherwise, the “Russian invasion” is inevitable.

    It’s after the headquarters games that they will not calm down.
  30. 0
    12 November 2016 20: 00
    [quote = Skeptic-Self-taught] Now I will explain why.
    Look here. Now it does not matter what Trump does. Collapse NATO, or force the rest to fork out.
    By the condition of the problem, we have:
    1. Screams that Russia will attack the EU in 100 days.
    2. Only NATO is able to stop Putin's "vicious underfed bears"
    3. Shouts of creating a single EU army.
    We have in fact:
    1. Russia is not going to fight the EU. Even with the Poles. Even with the Balts.
    Thus, shouting about the imminent attack of Russia is a win-win option.
    Since after 100 days it will allow you to change the record: and shout about:
    1. Only WE have restrained Putin
    2. We need even more security.
    3. We showed our unity and commitment to democratic values ​​and Putin was scared.
    That's all. [/ Q
    Shouting about what will not happen, and attributing merit for what has not happened to yourself ... Well, reward it!
  31. 0
    12 November 2016 20: 56
    Rasmussen noted that the Baltic countries and Ukraine are “close friends of the United States.” And he added: “Neglecting their interests will have far-reaching consequences and usher in the end of a [global] US-led system”

    But what about the traitors - the best friends of the new owners, in other words, loyal slaves, but this is while the owner pays the table. And “the beginning of the end of the US-led system” was not laid today, but they chose not to notice it, relying on their friends in Russia, who undermined its foundations, and lost.
    As they were blind, they still cannot recognize new trends in the world. This blindness will destroy them, if only they would not drag us into the abyss! hi
  32. 0
    12 November 2016 21: 54
    I like these "experts of Russian aggression" Either old men are senile or von der Leyen is a former gynecologist
  33. 0
    13 November 2016 02: 43
    They will kill Trump, even though he is far from Kennedy. He declared his independence, which the US does not allow anyone. His presidents in the first place.
    1. 0
      13 November 2016 05: 49
      Quote: shinobi
      They will kill Trump, even though he is far from Kennedy. He declared his independence, which the US does not allow anyone. His presidents in the first place.

      Do not worry. There are no independent people, especially in politics. But they do not elect the president as president, but appoint what is with them, what is with us. Behind Trump are such forces that have twisted TransNacCompanies (and what is more powerful in the world?) Into a ram’s horn.
      Another thing if this is a game. 1. TNCs put forward an epileptic Clinton so that she is guaranteed to lose the election.
      2. To cause unrest against the election of Trump or finally kill him. 3. Introduce martial law and leave Obama prezik.
  34. 0
    13 November 2016 09: 08
    Another thing if this is a game.
    1. TNCs put forward an epileptic Clinton so that she is guaranteed to lose the election.
    2. To cause unrest against the election of Trump or finally kill him.
    3. Introduce martial law and leave Obama prezik
    Well, you brother turned. I am cautious about conspiracy thesis .... but I respect it here .... Well, there were in the history of the arson of the Reichstag, the assassination of Kirov but so globally .... tongue
  35. 0
    13 November 2016 12: 33
    Arrogant Saxons! Remind us when Russia attacked England or Europe?
  36. 0
    14 November 2016 00: 05
    Who is there in their window, who screamed with shouts - Russians are coming? Forrestal seems ... Worthy heirs, can they repeat it?
  37. 0
    14 November 2016 07: 17
    As in a joke:
    A woman is standing on the balcony of the 3 floor, a man is walking downstairs, she tells him:
    -the man! I'm afraid of you, you will rape me!
    -how? You stand up there!
    - and I will come down .....

    it is not clear what they want from Russia in a gay rope. They are calling "grab us"! Looks like kirdyk will soon be a debt economy, and zero resources. And then Russia, eternally feeding everyone ...
  38. 0
    17 November 2016 18: 03
    Quote: Navy7981
    Who is there in their window, who screamed with shouts - Russians are coming? Forrestal seems ... Worthy heirs, can they repeat it?

    Hardly ... I read the review, for this 2017 War with Russia ... Well, if he is the same general as the writer, and the rest are the same there, then they should be afraid ... The drunken motorized infantry from Kaliningrad will get lost for the additive at BETEER who went to the nearest village and they have to accept the surrender of NATO in Brussels ... In general, they don’t praise his imperishable ... Garbage they say, the characters are cardboard, villains are not natural ... Anyway ... The plot He doesn’t take ... Graphomania in general ... In Russian, by the way, no, it’s even a shame somehow ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"