Spy on the "Admiral Kuznetsov." Disadvantages of a new type of power in the USA

9


The US Navy P-8A Poseidon patrol anti-submarine aircraft made a reconnaissance flight on Thursday to the deployment area of ​​the naval aircraft carrier group of the Russian Navy, which includes the Admiral Kuznetsov heavy aircraft carrier, in the eastern Mediterranean between Cyprus and Syria, according to Western sites tracking military movements aviation. According to them, an American aircraft with tail number 168858, flying from Sigonella airbase in Sicily, is currently actively monitoring the actions of the Russian ship group, making circular flights at an altitude of 6,4 thousand meters 60-80 km from the coast of Syria.



According to US military sources, carrier-based fighter aircraft Su-33 and Mig-29K, which are based on ammunition, have already begun flying over the territory of Syria. While they have not yet participated in hostilities, however, as noted by the Pentagon, "there are signs that the Admiral Kuznetsov carrier-based aircraft will be part of the larger combined forces that will be involved in operations in the Syrian city of Aleppo this week."

Meanwhile in our Ministry of Defense have already announced the direct participation of a group led by Kuzey in the operation to liberate Aleppo. Despite the fact that today they are again talking about the effectiveness of humanitarian pauses and their possible introduction, to free the city from terrorists is really only by storm. Nevertheless, the Pentagon reacts to both variants of the development of events (humanitarian pause and assault) equally dissatisfied. This proves not only a predetermined attitude to the presence of Russia in Syria in general, but also to the fact that the Pentagon has its own line, which differs from the diplomatic Washington.

No wonder today the media wrote about the different rhetoric of Trump and the special services. Each on its own wave, and each has its own function. Unfortunately, we have to admit that the trend with Obama dancing speaks about the high media role of the president, but how much he actually determines the international direction is to be learned from the US actions in the Middle East. The absence of real presidential powers is possible not only under the new administration, but has already been demonstrated under the White House’s 44 head.

Today, everything is proved by the lack of influence of the president on the decisions of at least the Congress. What are the only discrepancies under the law on 11 September, which painfully hit the image of Saudi Arabia.

Of course, it is too early to say that the president elected yesterday can immediately begin to determine the actions of the military. The main thing is that his team, which formed the pre-election line, does not disagree with the rest of the US legislative and executive bodies. Of course, it is unlikely that Moscow would send such a serious group to the shores of Syria, not knowing that all this would not be noticed by the States.

The operation of the shock group for the liberation of Aleppo was to begin this week. And even if American planes continue their observation flights, they will not be able to interfere with the design of the Russian HQs. Only two questions remain: will it be possible to avoid civilian casualties, and will Russia be able to reverse the utterly biased attitude to military actions in Syria by this operation?
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

Ad
Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official
9 comments
Information
Visitors in the group a guest, can not leave comments on this publication.
  1. +2
    12 November 2016 06: 19
    There are only two questions left: will it be possible to avoid casualties among the civilian population, and will Russia be able to reverse this completely biased attitude to military operations in Syria with this operation?

    I believe not in both cases.
    The militants will hide behind peacefully and this will inevitably lead to the losses of the peacekeeper.
    Well, the WEST bias towards our VKS was and will be ... time to get used to it.
    1. 0
      12 November 2016 06: 54
      This is their only chance to hide behind and, if possible, pull back even more military ATS. They are counting on help.
    2. 0
      12 November 2016 07: 03
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Well, the WEST bias towards our VKS was and will be

      That's for sure. Only their aircraft are angels with wings. Only terrorists and sometimes excavators bomb. And attacks on civilians and the army of the SAR are an unfortunate accident. It happens to everyone?!
  2. 0
    12 November 2016 07: 08
    Quote: VSZMK
    Only their aircraft are angels with wings. Only terrorists and sometimes excavators bomb. And attacks on civilians and the army of the SAR are an unfortunate accident.
    Bomb, albeit three times accurate and smart, not a sniper bullet, where it fell - it was gone. Another thing is the targeted use of ATS and civilian facilities.
  3. 0
    12 November 2016 09: 37
    In truth, I do not care about Assad and Syria, but the religion of evil must be destroyed!
  4. 0
    12 November 2016 09: 38
    Any power in the United States is good compared to the sick old woman Clinton
  5. 0
    12 November 2016 12: 05
    Well, not in the subject ////
    which ended up lasting three days of battles against the Russian Army.

    Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/86422-pora-priznat-n
    yneshniy-ukrainskiy-rezhim-terroristicheskim.html

    Politikus.ru
  6. 0
    12 November 2016 12: 06
    Quote: tundra
    Well, not in the subject ////
    which ended up lasting three days of battles against the Russian Army.

    Source: http://politikus.ru/articles/86422-pora-priznat-n
    yneshniy-ukrainskiy-rezhim-terroristicheskim.html

    Politikus.ru

    or maybe he nafig
  7. +1
    12 November 2016 12: 06
    A few words "about the main thing."
    the Pentagon has its own line, different from diplomatic Washington.
    Amazing in depth conclusion! Or does the author believe that the military should be engaged in boltology, and not obey orders? Which, by the way, are given to them not by DIPLOMATS, but by the administration (government) through the KNS.
    The media wrote about the different rhetoric of Trump and the special services. Each on its own wave, and each has its own function.
    Again: everyone plays his part in the polyphonic orchestra of Washington politics. Special services, as a rule, evade public statements, in contrast to politicians fighting for the presidency. And why be surprised?
    The lack of real powers of the president is possible not only with the new administration,
    THIS IS --- P Ö R L! BLIMEY!!! When I read it, I was almost numb ... However !!!
    The powers of the President of the United States are determined by the Constitution. Everything that is written there - he has every right to put into practice. Even without the permission of the US Congress, to conduct military operations abroad by the forces of the Marine Corps.
    Today, everything proves the lack of influence of the president on the decisions of at least Congress.
    Well, what can I say? There is no need to confuse Democrat Obama and Republican Trump with the Republican majority in both houses of the US Congress.
    I think the Donald Republican will have more chances to count on the support of party members. Or do you think differently?
    Of course, it is too early to say that the president elected yesterday can immediately begin to determine the actions of the military. The main thing is that his team, which formed the election line, does not disagree with other legislative and executive bodies of the United States.
    Well, you’re straight and don’t know what to say on this (inherently clinical) case!
    First, the US President is the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. Or does the author seriously believe that the military will act contrary to the orders of the Supreme High Command !?
    The newly elected US President is forming a new "team" of members of his campaign headquarters. He also appoints the Chief Justice, ministers (secretaries), including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Secretary of State). Well, and with whom will he "disagree" in opinions? if he has a majority in both houses of Congress and in all positions in the administration of his people?
    Now the main thing. Why does this happen when two lines in an article do not fit together.
    In my opinion, it is impossible under one "cap", without dividing marks, to smuggle two different preparations: the AVKUG campaign in Mediterranean and the maxims about the new US president.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"