Martini-Henry rifle - the most perfect "hardware"

14
“He fired once, and fired two, and a bullet whistled at the bushes ... Shoot like a soldier,” Kamal said, “I'll see how you ride!”
("The Ballad of the West and the East", R. Kipling)


It must be assumed that the son of the colonel and the chief of the scouts shot Kamala from a revolver, that is why he missed. Shoot it from a carbine, the chances of getting into it would be much greater. True, the poem does not say how weapons enjoyed the commander of the reconnaissance detachment. But judging by the time, it could well be the Martin-Henry rifle (or carbine) of the system, with which the English soldiers at the end of the nineteenth century had to be fought in Africa and on the Afghan border ...



Martini-Henry rifle - the most perfect "hardware"

British soldier with a martini-henry rifle.

The problem of loading rifles with a muzzle was, in fact, never a problem. He put it upright, put the powder to sleep, drove the wad, then a bullet, then again the wad, or even lowered the bullet to Minie on the powder, sprinkled the powder on the shelf or put the capsule on the brand tube and put it on. But how can the rider or infantryman do all the same, but lying down? Here, everything was decided by loading from the treasury, but there were some technical problems here. Christian Sharps, who created a rifle and a carbine for cavalrymen with a vertical wedge sliding in grooves, was able to solve them in the simplest way from the technical point of view. A paper cartridge was inserted into the open breech, with a movement of a lever on the neck of the box, the bolt rose, with a sharp edge cut off the bottom of the cartridge and locked the "treasury". Through it was a hole from the brandtrubka, which was still wearing a cap. Then most of the Sharps rifles were remade for round-up or center-fire cartridges and metal sleeves.


Christopher Sharps rifle bolt scheme.

His rifles broke all records for reliability and accuracy, and for many years remained a favorite weapon and bison hunters and ... snipers, as they provided high accuracy of fire. And it was he, Sharps, who invented the mechanism, controlled by a lever arm, made in the form of a trigger guard back in 1851, while the famous Tyler Henry patented his mechanism even later than Christopher Spencer - the author of a seven-shot carbine, also with a gate controlled by such same lever. He invented it in 1860, and in fact the “Henry clip” only differs from it in form.


The second model of the carbard Maynard.


A very rare model of a cap carbine, which was in service with the army of the Southerners and produced at the plant in Downville in Virginia in 1862,

Whatever it was, and the system with a lever on the neck of the box, which was a continuation of the trigger guard, widely spread in the same United States during the internecine war between the North and the South. These were the systems of Sims, Stevens, Ballard, the famous "Winchester", and subsequently the rifle "Savage" (or "Savage").


Martini-Henry rifle rev.1871

Similarly, the lever, performed in concert with the trigger guard, was controlled by the bolt in the Henry Peabody rifle. This system appeared in the 1862 year, and the design of the gate part was such that the gate in it was movably fixed on the axis, which was above the location of the axial line of the bore. When the bracket went down and forward, the front part of the shutter went down. The breech at the same time opened, and the cartridge case was removed. It remained to invest in the barrel of a new cartridge, raise the lever and shoot. In the US, the Peabody system was liked, but the end of the Civil War put an end to his work. But his rifle was interested in Europe, and above all in Switzerland.


As you can see, the lever has a large shoulder and besides, it is conveniently located. On the receiver is clearly visible lever fuse. Other protruding parts on the receiver are missing!

There, the Swiss engineer Frédéric von Martini (1832 - 1897) enclosed the Peabody system (of which the external trigger, which needed to be cocked separately), was a serious flaw in one mechanism (still controlled by the lever behind the trigger guard), in which the trigger (representing spring-loaded firing pin) was located inside the gate. The Martini system came to the liking of the British army, which it was adopted in 1871 year.


Oval "medallion" with cutting - under the thumb, so as not to slide, being laid on the receiver.

This is how the Martini-Henry rifle, combining the Martini bolt and the polygonal rifling of the Scotsman Alexander Henry (1817 - 1895) from Edinburgh, was born. It all started with the fact that in England in 1864, they decided to create a committee to equip the army with a rifle that was loaded from the breech. It was clear that the easiest and cheapest way was to remake the existing stock of muzzle-loading rifles, and not to make a new weapon. As a result, the Snyder rifle with the designation “Snyder-Enfield Mk I” appeared in September 1866, which was a remake of the British Enfield MXXNX rifle. The reworking method was adopted very simple and therefore effective. 1853 mm was cut off from the breech breech and the receiver with the new Snyder bolt was screwed onto it, and all other parts of the rifle were left unchanged.


Aim.

However, Snyder’s rifle did not last long in service and was replaced by a Martini-Henry rifle already in 1871 — perhaps the most advanced rifle of that time. Like all other army rifles of those years, it was single-shot, had the traditional caliber 11,43-mm, length 1250 mm, barrel length 840 mm, weight without bayonet 3800 g, rate of fire 10 shots per minute. In the trunk were seven rifling Henry. The initial speed of the bullet was 411 m / s. The range of the aimed shot was 1188 m.


The muzzle of the barrel, ramrod and bayonet mounting.

The wooden parts of the rifle were made of quality American walnut wood. The forend had a length of 750 mm, a steel ramrod of length 806 mm was inserted into it. The butt had a steel back plate, sometimes smooth, sometimes with a diamond-shaped notch. It was attached with a latch for unlocking the bolt. The rifle bolt is swinging, driven by the lower arm. The drummer's platoon was carried out with the same lever, the empty cartridge was ejected from the rifle using an ejector. The sight was a step-frame, the front sight had a triangular cross-section.


Breech with an open shutter.


The position of the lever when the shutter is open.

The barrel was round, screwed into the receiver, and attached to the forearm by two sliding rings of steel. The trigger had a notch to increase the sensitivity of the finger, and a soft descent without free running. After a shot, the sleeve is thrown right-up-back when the shutter is lowered from lowering the lever. The butt is attached to the receiver with a long and strong clamping screw, the head of which is closed by a cast butt plate attached to the butt with two screws. The bayonet for the rifle was adopted triangular with valleys, very similar to the bayonet adopted in the Russian imperial army. In addition to the rifle, a cavalry carbine was produced, differing only in a smaller length. But the cartridges for him were slightly different. The fact is that because of the relatively small weight and large caliber, the recoil of the carbine was quite large. Therefore, cartridges with light bullets of shorter length were taken to the carbines, which had a red paper rather than white paper winding.


From left to right: .577 Snider-Enfield, .577 / 450 Martini-Henry from brass foil, .577 / 450 Peabody-Martini with a seamless brass sleeve and .303 British Mk VII (for Lee-Metford / L-rifle rifle for Mh.

Edward Boxer cartridges of various types with a brass, seamless bottle-shaped sleeve are suitable for the rifle. Cartridge length - 79,25 mm, weight of powder charge from black powder - 5,18 g, diameter of a lead cylindrical bullet - 11,35 mm, weight - 31,49 g. Like all bullets of that time, the bullet was shellless, with a rounded head, and wrapped in oiled paper for improve obturation, since it had a diameter smaller than the diameter of the bore.


Martini-Henry cartridges made by crimping a straight sleeve from a Snyder .577 rifle.

Wrapping the bullet with oiled paper and using a batcher located behind the bullet helped to reduce friction and prevent lead-cutting of the rifling holes. When fired, the bullet was heard, its diameter increased, and she pressed the paper into the grooves. The best .45 Peabody-Martini cartridges were then produced in the USA, and they had higher rates than European ones.


Cartridges .577 / .450. From left to right:
1. 1871 sample of the year with a foil sleeve. 2. For carbines. 3. Single. 4. Sample middle 1880-s with a seamless sleeve.

The rifle was produced several modifications Martini-Henry Mark I (1871-1876), Martini-Henry Mark II (1877-1881), Martini-Henry Mark III (1879-1888), Martini-Henry Mark IV (1888-1889).


The differences in modifications outwardly were very minor.

The Martini-Henry Mk II rifle, unlike the base model, had an improved trigger, a slightly different pillar, and a new ramrod. On Martini-Henry Mk III, the sight was again improved, and the cocking pointer was changed. Martini-Henry Mk IV received an elongated lever for recharging, which increased the reliability of the shutter at elevated temperature, the modified shape of the receiver, as well as a new butt and ramrod.


Martini-Henry rifle mechanism.

Note that Martini-Henry rifles in the English army were loved. They were able to demonstrate the rate of fire up to 40 rpm, in addition, it was very simple and extremely "resistant to war". By the standards of those years, it was possible to hit the target from a distance of 1000 yards (913 m), and good accuracy was achieved at a range of 500 yards.


Martini-Henry rifles, even being decommissioned, were manufactured in England before 1908, and even entered service for ... young scouts!

The popularity of the Martini-Henry system is also indicated by the fact that it was in service not only in Great Britain, but also in Turkey, in Romania, and also in Egypt. The Martini-Henry rifle served well in the wars that the British Empire waged in Africa, Afghanistan, on the northwestern border of India and against Maori in New Zealand.


I could not resist not imagining myself as a British colonialist somewhere in the wilds of "black Africa" ​​and not holding this rifle in my hands. By the way, personal impressions of her treatment are the most positive. Lightweight, comfortable, there is not a single extra or protruding part. The killing rate of the bullet was, of course, very great. In short, the perfect single-shot "killing machine."
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    18 November 2016 16: 15
    It is even more interesting to feel not just a British colonialist, but a British colonialist in the battle of Isandlvane. Then the British in a battle with the Zulus at the cost of losing 1329 people, 1000 martini-Henry rifles and 400 000 cartridges realized that giving an infantryman a quick-fire rifle is not enough, you still need to provide him with ammunition. So in the equipment of the British infantryman appeared such a familiar thing now as a pouch.
    1. +4
      18 November 2016 23: 11
      Yes, then only those who did not have red uniforms were saved. They were ordered not to take the "Krasnomundirnikov" prisoners!
  2. +2
    18 November 2016 18: 10
    At first, according to the photo, I did not understand where the ejector was, then I saw it according to the scheme of the mechanism. A bullet wrapped in paper - probably she was dragging this paper behind her and into the wound. Thanks, informative!
    1. +5
      18 November 2016 18: 19
      Ejector - (fr. Éjecteur, from éjecter - throw away from lat. Ejicio) - a device in which the transfer of kinetic energy from one medium moving at a faster speed to another. The ejector, working according to the Bernoulli law, creates a reduced pressure of one medium in a tapering section, which causes suction into the flow of another medium, which is then transferred and removed from the point of absorption by the energy of the first medium.
      You probably meant the extractor?
      1. +4
        18 November 2016 22: 56
        With regard to small arms, an ejector is a mechanism that ensures the removal of the sleeve outside the receiver, and the extractor ensures the extension of the sleeve from the chamber.
        1. +1
          19 November 2016 01: 16
          In relation to a given weapon, an extractor adapted to remove the sleeve outside the weapon is called an ejector, or ejector.
  3. +2
    18 November 2016 19: 24
    On photo: British soldier with rifle martini henry, on the background of Mount Isandula (Isandlvan).
  4. +4
    18 November 2016 20: 49
    Thank you, as a movie fan, I remember this rifle from heroes shooting at long distances. I vaguely remember that the rifle was an American cowboy's case in Australia.
    I hope humanity preserves some weapons and methods of production. To break out of the primitive communal system in front of, probably after another nuclear apocalypse laughing
    1. +1
      19 November 2016 12: 14
      Quote: marshes
      I vaguely remember that the rifle of an American cowboy happened to be in Australia.

      Wasn't that Remington’s rifle?
    2. +1
      24 November 2016 07: 05
      This rifle was also very well featured in the 1964 British film "The Zulu" about the battle of Roorks Drift.
  5. +3
    19 November 2016 04: 15
    It's funny how the British Empire armed their soldiers with very good, solid weapons in the 19th century. But as it grew decrepit, the quality of the weapon fell. Well, after WWII, in general, good small arms were no longer developed ... The last excellent rifle of the Empire is the LeEnfield, with an excellent bolt, which allows you to shoot very quickly and accurately, with a ten-round magazine. Not a Mauser, of course, but a very solid rifle. And that's all ...
    1. +2
      20 November 2016 01: 48
      And why was the FAL bad? The best post-war rifle after AK. And the L85 is not in a hurry to retire either, they’re already planning to upgrade the A3, which means it’s not so bad either.
    2. 0
      12 September 2019 14: 08
      Is Mauser the standard for rifles?
  6. 0
    27 June 2019 23: 12
    Vyacheslav, thanks, the article is interesting.
    Only the drop-shaped "lever" on the right side is not a fuse, but a cocking indicator. Straight up (12 o'clock) - not cocked, backward (7-9 o'clock) - drummer cocked. Only in the first photo it is in the correct position, in all the others, it looks like it was inserted incorrectly during assembly.
    Fuses in the form of an engine above the trigger were on the first model (MK I) but they decided to remove them even before the army was adopted. Only a few such instances have survived.
    They are found on commercial variants but not on standard army rifles.