Until the end of the year, the Western District will receive about 20-ti airplanes and helicopters

43
В aviation formations of the Western Military District by the end of 2016, about 20 planes and helicopters of operational-tactical and army aviation will arrive, reports press office District

Until the end of the year, the Western District will receive about 20-ti airplanes and helicopters




“Among the new aviation technology are the Mi-28, Mi-8, Mi-26, Mi-35H helicopters, Su-35 fighter jets and An-148 transport aircraft,” the release said.

According to the press service, "the flight and engineering staff is already at the manufacturing plants, where it receives new aircraft equipment."

Previously, the pilots were retrained in flight crew training centers.

In total, by the end of this year, “more than 1000 units of weapons and military equipment, in particular Tanks T-72B3, Msta-S self-propelled howitzers, multiple launch rocket systems of various types and calibers, communication and electronic warfare systems, ”the report said.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    10 November 2016 16: 20
    The Su-27 is still the most beautiful plane in the sky, let the beauty lovers of the T-50 excuse me, but it is not as graceful and graceful as the good old glider of the Su-27 !!!! Power, cunning, everything in it, piercing arrow heaven, ready to hit any opponent, beauty !!!
    1. +13
      10 November 2016 16: 26
      Quote: igorka357
      Su-27 is still the most beautiful plane in the sky

      The photo shows not the SU-27, but the SU-35S ... this can be seen from the "hump" behind the lamp and the more elongated front part.
      As for the PAK FA, so the taste and color ...
      20 units before the end of the year is great. I would like more attack aircraft such as the SU-30 and Su-35S.
      1. 0
        11 November 2016 07: 50
        Have you read my comment to the end? I actually talked about the glider, and he was on the Su-35 from which ... right ..)))
    2. +2
      10 November 2016 16: 27
      A good addition is waiting until the end of the year for our ZVO, 20 aircraft combat vehicles, of course, it will look impressive.
      1. +3
        10 November 2016 17: 02
        Quote: Giant thought
        A good addition is waiting until the end of the year for our ZVO, 20 aircraft combat vehicles, of course, it will look impressive.

        And this is just an excerpt from a wall newspaper signed "The Giant of Thought", the pilots of the Western Military District proposed to make a district newspaper from the wall newspaper and appoint Peter (pseudonym Giant of Thought) as chief editor.
      2. +1
        10 November 2016 17: 13
        We are most likely talking about rearmament, because there is no news about the formation of new aviation units. I wonder what equipment was sent for scrap.
        1. +5
          10 November 2016 17: 29
          According to our times, only perfect junk should be sent to scrap metal, everything that can be repaired and modernized cannot be eliminated! The armed forces were left without military equipment, albeit somewhat outdated because of these "metalworkers"
    3. +3
      10 November 2016 17: 31
      The Su-27 is still the most beautiful plane in the sky,
      The MiG-29 is also very beautiful. They are like brothers, only drying elder)
    4. +1
      10 November 2016 23: 44
      I agree about the glider, I've always loved it. A family of the most beautiful fighters in the world.
  2. +5
    10 November 2016 16: 26
    more than 1000 units of weapons and military equipment, in particular, T-72B3 tanks, Msta-S self-propelled howitzers, multiple launch rocket systems of various types and caliber, communications and electronic warfare systems

    Sounds like a toast !!!!!! well for the Armed Forces !!!!!!!! drinks
    1. 0
      11 November 2016 12: 30
      after work it is necessary to dink for such a toast))))
  3. +3
    10 November 2016 16: 26
    Response to NATO actions. The only question is what they want: to drag Russia into the arms race (this is a burden on the economy) or are they preparing for war. Options one worse than the other. But the armed forces are necessary, because they are a guarantee of peace.
  4. +4
    10 November 2016 16: 27
    No matter how China would blow through Kazakhstan, Samara to Moscow ... You can’t pull everything to the West ...
    1. +8
      10 November 2016 16: 35
      For China to fight with us, especially now, oh, how inconvenient, so there is no need to expect a war with China.
      1. +5
        10 November 2016 16: 36
        You should never trust China !!!
        1. +2
          10 November 2016 20: 24
          It's not about believing, not believing. China will take all its resources to go to war with us. And therefore, after the conflict, the United States will occupy them. So it is also about the USA, it is not profitable for them to attack us, because they, exhausted, will be captured by the Chinese or Hindus.
          1. +2
            10 November 2016 20: 36
            What resources? Our entire direction through Kazakhstan and Samara to Moscow is almost open ... Look at the number of PLA districts ...
            1. 0
              10 November 2016 21: 36
              What do you think China forgot in Moscow? -)
              1. 0
                10 November 2016 22: 43
                And so the path is shorter to the annexation of Siberia and the Far East ...
                1. +1
                  10 November 2016 23: 42
                  What kind of war are you talking about? Nuclear chtol?
                  1. 0
                    11 November 2016 03: 37
                    Not the fact that it will be nuclear ...
                    1. 0
                      11 November 2016 12: 28
                      Don't be silly. Any minor conflict can inflate, but up to a certain level - the risk of a nuclear war.
                      1. 0
                        11 November 2016 12: 38
                        I wrote that it's not a fact, and you still need to manage to use nuclear weapons ...
            2. +1
              11 November 2016 07: 52
              You should read the dear military doctrine of the Russian Federation ..)))
              1. 0
                11 November 2016 12: 39
                She is not unique ...
    2. +1
      10 November 2016 17: 12
      Quote: Holoy
      No matter how China would blow through Kazakhstan, Samara to Moscow ... You can’t pull everything to the West ...
      We have our own current China in China, Richard Sorge. So we know where to pull weapons. soldier
      1. +5
        10 November 2016 17: 26
        They are building the Silk Road so that they can get to Moscow on good roads ... they have already built roads in Kazakhstan ... Their DRGs, under the cover of traders in every city with a millionaire, are not so simple.
        1. +8
          10 November 2016 17: 32
          Quote: Holoy
          They are building the Silk Road so that they can get to Moscow on good roads ... they have already built roads in Kazakhstan ... Their DRGs, under the cover of traders in every city with a millionaire, are not so simple.

          Yes, I completely agree with you about China, we must not forget, it is still an ally.
  5. +10
    10 November 2016 16: 34
    Many people think that this is the answer to NATO and the states ... but I think this is just a necessary minimum re-equipment of the army, which has not been carried out for many years. And really minimal.
  6. +3
    10 November 2016 17: 05
    About 25 years ago, for such news published in the media, the entire press service went together to places not so distant. In general, some kind of strange openness ...
  7. +1
    10 November 2016 17: 25
    For China to fight with us, especially now, oh, how inconvenient, so there is no need to expect a war with China.

    Keep the powder dry.
    The photo shows not the SU-27, but the SU-35S ... this can be seen from the "hump" behind the lamp and the more elongated front part.

    Tell me how this paint (camouflage) of the aircraft is called correctly?
    In general, some kind of strange openness ...

    Compared to the years when they kissed the gums with adversaries, the censorship tightened up noticeably. And so, what age are we living in ?, the sailor posted a photo on the network and the enemies calculated the location of "Peter the Great", so that ... request
    1. +2
      10 November 2016 21: 54
      Quote: Sergey-72
      Tell me how this paint (camouflage) of the aircraft is called correctly?

      livery scheme - comminuted blue and white camouflage ...
  8. +1
    10 November 2016 17: 33
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: igorka357
    Su-27 is still the most beautiful plane in the sky

    The photo shows not the SU-27, but the SU-35S ... this can be seen from the "hump" behind the lamp and the more elongated front part.
    As for the PAK FA, so the taste and color ...
    20 units before the end of the year is great. I would like more attack aircraft such as the SU-30 and Su-35S.

    Yes, this is certainly good. Only every time you read such news, and remember that what is happening is not a step forward, but a slow return of the lost ... But let it be so!
  9. +1
    10 November 2016 17: 52
    It's high time, although this figure is just a "drop in the bucket"
  10. 0
    10 November 2016 18: 43
    Quote: Trevis
    The Su-27 is still the most beautiful plane in the sky,
    The MiG-29 is also very beautiful. They are like brothers, only drying elder)

    Yes, I agree, and SU is much more
    1. 0
      11 November 2016 07: 54
      So su is a heavy fighter.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +2
    10 November 2016 21: 31
    Great news, and the guys who will work on this technique I just adore, adore, salute them and stand at attention in front of them.
  13. +1
    10 November 2016 21: 34
    Quote: Holoy
    How not to miss.

    So don't blink! Only it is harmful
    In general, you are not the only one smart and A LOT who knows / understands.
    1. 0
      10 November 2016 22: 57
      Quote: VladimS
      In general, you are not the only one smart and A LOT who knows / understands.

      in 1941, communist propaganda also said so to many ... and then they fled to Moscow ...
      1. 0
        10 November 2016 23: 18
        Seeing the current "steps" in this direction (rearmament), comparison of situations does not roll, at all ... And then, the situation then and now are two big differences.
        They did NOT succumb to the "right location" and delayed with the proper answer from all the available guns ..
        The first line of defense (especially) which was destroyed in the first day.
        Both equipment and supply depots for regiments, mottos, armies.
        And this is a completely different story, which has little to do with the actual rearmament.
        1. 0
          10 November 2016 23: 23
          Yes, the situations are different and not in favor of the current state of affairs ...
          In the direction of Kazakhstan, Samara, Moscow, there are no troops at all, and no fortifications, but there are excellent roads along which you can relatively safely get to Moscow ...

          The pace of the offensive will be so high that Russia will not have time to apply on the advancing parts of the PLA NW ... since they will already be deep in the territory of Russia ... 15 million there, even without mobilization ... China's conscripts will immediately go after the PLA ...
  14. 0
    10 November 2016 22: 32
    The 30s go little, only about 30 cars, which is very depressing.
  15. 0
    11 November 2016 14: 25
    Holoy, YOU are not speaking a fact, but I am explaining to you that any large-scale and risk-bearing conflict for our state entails the use of nuclear weapons. This is written in our doctrine. It follows that not a single state, even when it comes into conflict with us, dares to cross the line, because this is a guaranteed signing of a death sentence to itself. Just what can prevent you from being able to use nuclear weapons? Do you know what the Perimeter system is?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"