In China, the modernization of the ground complex NITKA with catapults

In China, the modernization of the ground test and training complex of ship aviation (THREAD), located on the shore of the Gulf of Bohai in Liaoning Province, reports bmpd.

In 2013 there were only blocks with springboards, which were used to prepare pilots for the first aircraft carrier "Liaoning". At present, the complex is equipped with catapults, “with the two catapult tracks somewhat different from each other (most likely, electromagnetic and steam catapults are installed),” the author writes with reference to military expert Yuri Lyamin.

According to some reports, "the first successful takeoffs of the deck J-15 using an electromagnetic catapult have already taken place," the publication notes.

"And indeed, judging by the last October satellite images, there 17 of October is seen J-15, standing next to one of the two ejection tracks," - said the expert.

This is a J-15 modification for take-off using a catapult and with WS-10 engines.

Comments

[Ustrushan]

China is preparing to become the ruler of the seas and oceans. There is money so far. I hope that we will stand side by side, and not opposite each other ...

[kolyhalovs]

I'll hang out. The ground complex THREAD sounds like self-propelled self-propelled guns.

[Cat man null]

China completes the modernization of ground testing ship aviation complex (THREAD)

- THREAD, in the original, is the Ground Test Training Complex Aviation
- The Chinese complex has nothing to do with the Soviet one. From the word "absolutely"

Somehow

[opus]

Quote: Cat Man Null

- The Chinese complex has nothing to do with the Soviet one. From the word "absolutely"

has, has.

On the outskirts of Wuhan, Hubei Province, a “ground-based aircraft carrier” was built - an almost complete overall copy of a medium-sized aircraft carrier with an island, a flight deck and a springboard, which in appearance is similar to the aircraft carrier cruiser project 1143.6 "Varyag" (now the Chinese aircraft carrier "Shi Lang")

A couple of these installations, which are reportedly located in Liaoning, Hubei and Shanxi provinces, are designed to simulate the deck of an aircraft carrier landing system. For example, the massive carrier pilot training base at Huludao, Liaoning province appears to be a near duplicate of the design of Nitka (Ukrainian"was!" Nazemniy Ispitatelno — Tryenirovochniy Kompleks Aviatsii: Land-based Naval Aviation Testing and Training Complex). The NITKA facilities are state of the art land-based installations for operating one of the Russian-designed carriers that utilize a ski ramp for take-off instead of the steam catapult and arresting cable / tailhook landing system used on US and French aircraft carriers ( Taipei Times, February 15)

Have CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery or Catapult Assisted Take-Off Barrier Arrested Recovery)
Brazil for carrier aviation training - the Chinese trained there in the 2009s (“PLAN Officers to Train on Brazilian Aircraft Carrier,” China Brief, June 12, 2009)
and STOBAR ((Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery) -THREAD (this is our version of STOBAR)
The Chinese both trained and stripped a lot from the thread





The Chinese have now pushed 2: 1 = no need to fly to Brazil and to Ukraine (oh, already to Russia)

So what "so"

Quote: kolyhalovs

The ground complex THREAD sounds like self-propelled self-propelled guns.

Yes....
afftor burns
IUTK KA (test training complex of naval aviation of the Navy).

That's better?

Then you can write
and "ground" IUTK KA


and "desktop" IUTK KA

[Bayonet]

Quote: opus

Then you can write
and "ground" IUTK KA

and "desktop" IUTK KA

And if he were colloquial - a duck!

[Giant thought]

It should be noted that the Chinese have made great progress in this matter, stubborn, in this they can be envied.

[Semen Semyonitch]

One can envy them that there are no Gaidar, Chubais and Ulyukaev ... But we have enough for everyone.

[lis-ik]

And also they can be envied that they are not pushing slogans, but they are doing things. Few of them have Giants.

[serega.fedotov]

Catapults mean not only "clones" of Kuznetsov, the Chinese are planning to build, but at least 2 projects in their development .... Enviable damn it ...

[newcomer]

After reading the article, I thought the same thing. I envy the Chinese white envy. we also want an aircraft carrier, at least as “Ulyanovsk”.

[donavi49]

The assembly of Type 001A is now ending. Although Dalian made a party commitment to lower the ship to NG, most likely this will not happen.

Next year they will begin to assemble Tip002 at the same place - it will be with a classic power plant and without jumps.

The program adopted in China for 15 years provides for 6 aircraft carriers:
Type001 (Varangian / Liaolin) + Type001А - period 2018 year
Type002 + Type002 - term 2024 year
2 New Nuclear Aircraft Carrier - 2030 Year Term

[voyaka uh]

Those. they will receive an electro magnetic catapult on a ship around 2024
with Type002?

[Polite Moose]

It seemed to me alone that on the 1st and 3rd photos a fragment of the runway in the form of the letter "Y" is clearly visible?
Considering the fact that the "Chinese NITKA" complex was most likely ripped off at our place, I dare to suggest that we will not see a snapshot of the entire complex for censorship reasons. So, as it is, to facilitate the orientation of young pilots in adverse weather conditions, in the Russian version it is made in the form of a cherished word.
How does this help in orienteering?
-Earth, I board number XXXX. Lost orientation. I don’t see where to sit. Waiting for your instructions.
-Board number XXX take a seat on ....
-Earth, I understand you, I see a landmark ...
PS International landmark, widely known. The Chinese will not miss by.

[Bayonet]

Quote: Polite Elk

Considering the fact that the "Chinese NITKA" complex was most likely ripped off with us

Together with an electromagnetic catapult? Sly ...

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Bayonet

Together with an electromagnetic catapult? Sly ...

Not. The catapult is not ours. Otherwise, the Russian catchphrase would have sounded: "How I fell from a catapult ..."

[legkostup]

Everything, now we can say with confidence that in the field of aircraft carrier aviation, China has surpassed the Russian Federation. Steal further, then cut through not such "polymers".

[Black Colonel]

Yes, they are the same here and dumped on the promised land.

[tomatokin]

Oh ... What’s the matter to you ??? By the way, when will you return the occupied territories?

[Zaurbek]

And ahead of Israel, by the way, too .... And Britain ... For China, the Navy is a matter of survival and control of supply routes. For the Russian Federation, this is not so.

[Lumumba]

Quote: legkostup

Everything, now we can say with confidence that in the field of aircraft carrier aviation, China has surpassed the Russian Federation. Steal further, then cut through not such "polymers".

I can build an electromagnetic catapult in my country house. Only now I have to build a nuclear power plant the size of a country toilet, which I can not do in the country. I do not have technologies (and never will) of compact nuclear power plants.

China is hard in this regard. If the technology of aircraft carrier troughs is an open secret, accessible even to Zimbabwean blacks, then only two countries in the world possess the technologies of compact nuclear power plants. Technologies, but not samples purchased in the USA (as in Britain for example). A compact nuclear reactor is not an iPhone.

[opus]

Quote: Lumumba

I can build an electromagnetic catapult in my country house.

Haroshaya you have a "dacha" under 100 hectares?

Do not disturb the neighbors?

100 million joules for only one launch of an aircraft (45-ton aircraft up to speed 250 km / h).

10 grams of bread has an energy reserve of approximately equivalent 100 kJ.
100MJ is 10 000 gr of bread or in Wh * h

1 MJ = 0,277 (7) kWh (1 kWh = 3,6 MJ)
100MJ = 27,7 (7) kWh WHY DO YOU NUCLEAR POWER PLANT?
You are not going to carry out CVN 78 standards?



30 kWh Batteries For 2016 Nissan LEAF


EMALS linear induction motors (LIDs) are 29% more efficient than steam catapults.

[quote]

To make the "frying pan" fly up, you need a catapult!
A good airplane and a springboard will be enough! And the size of an aircraft carrier depends on gadgets (catapults, in a count of two)!
Question? Have you already solved the problem of burning the guides? The currents (amperes) are crazy! And the metal burns like wood. 400 launches!? Oppa! And then repair? And where? And time? Yes, the energy advantage over a steam catapult, approx. 30%, and the preparation time for the "launch"? Stick, then, about two ends!
Hello everybody!

[Bayonet]

Quote: devis

A good airplane and a springboard is enough

The catapult allows you to take the maximum combat load.

Quote: devis

Have you already solved the problem of burning guide rails?

That you are not confused with the railgun?

[quote]

The flight, difficult, affected. Not in that steppe the brain was wrapped. I apologize.

[opus]

Quote: devis

Already solved the problem of burning guide rails? T

uh ...
ne understood
ibid.

Quote: opus

linear induction motors (LID)

Quote: devis

.Mah. 400 LAUNCHES!? Oppa!

oppa


lEven (!) Luminous tape does not burn

yes, in the feed drives of metal-cutting machines and in robotics, there are no mythical "400"

Quote: devis

What about the preparation time for the "launch"?

45 seconds Spitting in 484 MJ for 2-3 seconds, 45 seconds and again
they use 3 rotors (6400 revolutions per minute) with generators up to 121 MJ (34 kW). A max. starting (by mass) using 121 MJ of energy from each generator disk slows down the rotors from 6400 rpm to 5205 rpm.

https://web.archive.org/web/20041025233620/http:/
/www.lakehurst.navy.mil/nlweb/ieeerevc.pdf

it will take you more steam to generate

[quote]

Thank you!
I got a thread.

[Zaurbek]

But it is the catapult that increases the weight of the payload of the aircraft ...

[Buffet]

Wow ... No words. Only emotions. I am somehow ashamed of the power ...

[Bayonet]

Quote: SHVEDsky_stol

Wow ... No words. Only emotions. I am somehow ashamed of the power ...

Why be ashamed? Give the man a reactor, he will not set it up yet!
Lumumba Today, 13:18 AM

I can build an electromagnetic catapult in my country house.

[NEXUS]

The question is whether China needs aircraft carriers or not, not controversial, but positively affirmed, which cannot be said about us. We scratch all the turnips, but we argue - "it is necessary or not" ... At the same time, even destroyers have not yet been honored to build.

[Evil 55]

Moreover, at the point where all this was filmed, a very large number of different means of lifting aircraft into the air ..

[Damir]

and ours in Yeysk finished or not ????