Military Review

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation ordered a modernization of the Postscriptum automated control system

30
The Ministry of Defense intends to connect the Su-35С and Su-27СМ3 fighters to the PostScriptum automated control system (ACS), with which pilots can see the cruise missiles, UAVs and enemy planes at a distance of several hundred kilometers. If necessary, the system will be able to control the aircraft from the ground without the participation of the pilot, according to News.


The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation ordered a modernization of the Postscriptum automated control system


According to the documentation published on the state procurement website, the Ministry of Defense ordered the “revision of the 95K6 system in order to implement interfacing with the products by refining the interface, refining the working algorithms in terms of introducing the characteristics of the tools used, finalizing the database regarding the introduction of the tactical characteristics of these aircraft types”.

The works must be completed before the end of 2017 g, their cost is 35 million rubles.

"Postscript" is a unique system that not only transmits to the fighter all the information about the air and ground enemy that is in its combat use area, but also informs in real time the headquarters of where the aircraft is located He is fighting, about the remaining ammunition on board and fuel. In this case, the aircraft receives information not only from long-range radar detection (DRLO) airplanes, but also from ground-based radar stations, as well as from ground forces. Also, with the help of the ACS, the headquarters can transfer its flight route with specific points to the aircraft, and the control system independently, without the participation of the pilot, will lead the vehicle to the target. You can change the route directly in the air in real time. At the same time, it is possible to control fighters with the help of the automated control system not only from the regimental headquarters, but also from the National Defense Command Center ”, - told the newspaper the chief editor of the magazine "Arsenal of the Fatherland" Viktor Murakhovsky.

“It is noteworthy that as products matched with 95K6 in the contract documents are marked“ 35C ”and“ T-10CM3 ”. 35С is the code of the newest Su-35 fighter according to the nomenclature of the Air Force of Russia. And the T-10CM3 is the upgraded Su-27CM interceptor, which received the index СМ3. T-10 is a common index for all Su-27 aircraft, ”explains the publication.

According to the contract documentation, the military department will conduct joint tests of the “PostScript” and the aforementioned aircraft at the Savasleyka airbase in the Nizhny Novgorod region.
Photos used:
TASS / Vladimir Smirnov
30 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Giant thought
    Giant thought 10 November 2016 10: 10
    +6
    When this modernized automated control system is adopted, then our Su-35 and Su-27 fighters will have a much better chance of winning an air battle with NATO aircraft, we hope that this modernization will not take too much time in practice.
    1. gispanec
      gispanec 10 November 2016 10: 17
      +10
      Quote: Thought Giant
      then our Su-35 and Su-27 fighters will have a much greater chance of winning an air battle with NATO aircraft

      thank you for chewing us all this .... otherwise we thought that on the contrary it would weaken our Air Force ... ready to continue to enjoy your gigantic lectures .. hi
      1. IGOR GORDEEV
        IGOR GORDEEV 10 November 2016 10: 30
        +8
        gispanec ready to continue to enjoy your giant lectures .. hi

        then they are thoughts to taste: -D
        but seriously, most likely up to 90% of the comments can not be written on the site, because this is a statement of facts, fabrications, emotions, etc. But someone is interested, and someone is sick of the hell out of reading about the same thing :) To each his own.
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 10 November 2016 22: 06
          +3
          Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
          To each his own.

          ... nowadays, the knowledge of materiel tends to the absolute 0 for many commentators ... three years ago there was a completely different picture ... learn to match, your Mother ... it was not considered an insult and really taught and pulled up knowledge, so as not to be profane ... nowadays "voidboltology" is blooming in magnificent color ... and so on ... KSA / ACS "Postscript" in service since 2013/14 first mentions in the public domain 2011 ... works in conjunction with KSA / ACS "Horizon", "Vertical", "Service", "Rubezh" - all this is the command and control system, the air force control system ... the superior for all KSA / ACS of the Air Force is "Baikal" or "Universal" ... the general system of KSA / ACS was built during the Soviet era ... "Baikal" in its first incarnation already knew how to direct 3 fighter regiments equipped with KSA / ACS "Rubezh" ... "Universal" from birth has a built-in PN of the Air Force ... the picture is not new but gives an idea true about KSA / ACS in the RF Armed Forces ... hi
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 10 November 2016 22: 06
            +3
            ... and in pursuit of "Baikal" ... hi
    2. opus
      opus 10 November 2016 10: 42
      +9
      Quote: Thought Giant
      let's hope that this modernization will not take too much time in practice.

      It won't. There is a new command transmission station, with "the purpose of implementing interfacing with 35C and T-10SMZ products"



      Report of JSC "OKB" Peleng " for 2011:

      "...State tests of the Automated Control System of the Fighter Aviation Regiment (ACS IAP) 95K6 as part of:
      - A set of automation tools for the command post of fighter aircraft (KSA KP) "Vertical" (index 82C6);
      - a complex of means of automation of the fighter guidance point (KSA PN) "Horizon" (index 74C6);
      - a set of automation equipment for home aerodromes (KSA AB) "Service" (index 83C6) ... ".

      The control of the regiments armed with attack aircraft or MC AK, solving strike missions, is carried out through the command post, the air of the FA ACS "Fazenda-T".
      When solving fighter missions - KP (SKP, PN) IAP ASU "Postscript".
      (The aforementioned ACSs have a completely different management ideology).
      Generation 4+ automated control systems are a thing of the past. Everyone is working on item 5.

      A multi-purpose aircraft (MDC) appeared, the BZ becomes quite real: after completing an attack mission (for example, hitting a tank battalion on a march) in a subsequent departure, which should take place in 1,5-2 hours, the regiment will be tasked with repelling an enemy air attack .



      Threat.
      the lack of hardware-functional integration of systems based on common physical principles leads to underutilization of the technical capabilities of systems, duplication of equipment and an increase in the mass of equipment;
      1. Inok10
        Inok10 10 November 2016 22: 08
        +2
        Quote: opus
        the lack of hardware-functional integration of systems based on common physical principles leads to underutilization of the technical capabilities of systems, duplication of equipment and an increase in the mass of equipment;

        .... clearly wrote Gridasov ... go up to my previous comment and look at "integration of systems operating on common physical principles" ... laughing
  2. igor.borov775
    igor.borov775 10 November 2016 10: 14
    +3
    Hi!! Finally, the implementation of the very project that was quietly talked about as a distant dream began. After all, once the MIG -31 was created with such a calculation, but it was ahead of its time. It seems strange to learn how to manage space in outer space, but nearby in the air such problems were highlighted that it took decades to solve them. The USA went faster along this path. Now we have the opportunity to create such a system. The elements have already been tested there in Syria. Good luck to our scientists and designers.
    1. jjj
      jjj 10 November 2016 10: 25
      +2
      "Ka-50" could return to base and land without the participation of the pilot
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 10 November 2016 13: 49
        +2
        Quote: jjj
        "Ka-50" could return to base and land without the participation of the pilot

        This is claimed for PAK FA. hi
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. okko077
    okko077 10 November 2016 10: 23
    +4
    Has this unique system already existed somewhere? ... And ESU TZ "Constellation M"! He also sees everything and can be controlled from the headquarters only on the ground. The result: useless rubbish, funds thrown to the wind, the unfulfilled presidential program and the solidarity silence of high-ranking military personnel. Everyone sees how it is "applied" in Syria ..... Another "unique" creation, only for the Airborne Forces - "Andromeda-D" ..... Another cut of the dough ?! Gentlemen, it's time to create a unified information system, and on its basis similar systems. You cannot control something without information about the enemy ... Moreover, this information must be obtained, duplicated from several sources, it must be transmitted through closed channels and processed in a closed system, and all this in real time at high speed due to high performance the most modern computing systems ... But after all this, which we do not have yet, already manage something in real time. There is no other way. When will the guys at the General Staff understand this? ..
    1. dauria
      dauria 10 November 2016 12: 41
      +1
      When will the uncles in the General Staff understand this? ..


      To go nuts .... belay Let it be known to you, the "uncles in the General Staff" always think about management, from time immemorial, and even in a nuclear war. Or do you think that the headquarters is needed only for the issuance of food certificates?
  5. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 10 November 2016 10: 29
    0
    An element of network-centric warfare ... of course it needs to be constantly improved and developed ...
    It remains now to work out the use of weapons using this system ...
    1. opus
      opus 10 November 2016 11: 21
      +3
      Quote: silberwolf88
      It remains now to work out the use of weapons using this system ...

      This is an automated fighter control system air regiment (ACS IAP) 95K6.
      The armament is "used" by the aircraft pilot.
      and "direct" it to the target
      KSA PN "Horizon" (index 74C6) and KSA KP "Vertical" (index 82C6)


      in principle, everything is "like them" (+/-)


      and this is "here" - New interiors of workplaces of operators of the modernized board

      it was
    2. okko077
      okko077 10 November 2016 11: 43
      0
      I also like the word "network-centric". The author of the article and many others are trying to impress us with a flight of thought and depth of visibility .... I will give a child's example, clear to everyone. What is the difference between a children's toy radio-controlled helicopter with a video camera from our military UAV? Answer: NOTHING! A child and a military control operator are jumping around a tablet on which a picture is visible. Only for a child this is a game, and our military calls it: a means of reconnaissance or means of objective control. A military operator, however, like a child, can write it down on a USB flash drive and send it to headquarters for a report and show it to us on TV. Yes, of course. , the subsequent analysis at the headquarters will make it possible to determine the coordinates of fixed, capital structures. But the tanks and cars left and the caravans left ... And what can a modern UAV do, together with an information-combat system, in which it is included? This UAV, with the help of repeaters, via a secure channel, transmits the image and coordinates of targets to the operator's console of the combat control center, which analyzes the targets, determines the belonging and priority, and transmits these coordinates to the means of destruction. It can be self-propelled guns, MLRS, helicopters, airplanes and combat drones ... All this happens in real time and through the provided communication and control channels. The operator of the center controls the destruction of the target with the help of the same UAV, if it is necessary to repeat the strike ... Draw your own conclusions. If we have it, then why the war in Syria has not ended yet? ... It is not difficult to do this and we can! .. .What is missing?...
      1. dauria
        dauria 10 November 2016 12: 50
        0
        This is not difficult to do, and we can! ... What is missing? ...


        Personally, you obviously do not have enough clearance "in form" and awareness. But do not be discouraged, but you have the opportunity to surf the Internet. With admission, you will have neither the desire nor the opportunity. wink
        1. okko077
          okko077 10 November 2016 13: 01
          0
          We have a result in Syria. About admission to children a bedtime story ...
          1. dauria
            dauria 10 November 2016 15: 28
            0
            About admission to children a bedtime story ...


            Do not be ridiculous .... Or do you seriously think that you will find even the slightest information on such developments (ours and foreign ones) on the Internet, except for "being developed", "unique", "network-centric", composed by bored writers? And the specialists, their meager part, which they should know, will take with them to the grave. And in general, as one cartoon character said, "In our time, only porn was watched on the Internet"
            1. okko077
              okko077 10 November 2016 18: 19
              +2
              Why look for information about what is not? We DO NOT have integrated combat information systems .... We do not have UAVs in service that provide real-time coordinates of targets and provide target designation for weapons. Our UAVs are separate, our information systems are separate and our weapons are separate, all via radio communications in the manual-oral mode and with obscenities ..... Enough to hide your wretchedness and backwardness behind the secrecy regime ... In Syria there are only victories, and there are more partisans already we can’t win the year, is it with complete dominance in the air and without air defense and with the support of local authorities ?!
  6. FID
    FID 10 November 2016 12: 48
    +1
    Targeting and control of the plane ... Someone who will explain to me, not a very smart citizen, obviously, will explain what the difference is. Is the Su-35 a UAV? T-50 - UAV? Or will the pilot's hands be tied so that he DOES NOT control the plane?
    1. opus
      opus 10 November 2016 13: 25
      +1
      Quote: SSI
      Or will the pilot's hands be tied so that he DOES NOT control the plane?

      Wounded, killed, etc., i.e. cannot rule.
      The technique is expensive, the damage from the fall is the same.

      therefore, it is likely that they "adapt" the "Service" complex of automation equipment for home aerodromes (KSA AB) (index 83C6).

      Autoland: Instrument Landing System (ILS) or Microwave Landing System (MLS) - crew required
      Is the airport db certified in category IIIc ICAOCAT IIIc?

      like Ka-50 was planted like that recently!
      or?

      Well, TSU is from AWACS

      Features of the automatic approach and crew interaction (RLE of the Tu-154 aircraft.)

      For a reliable approach in automatic mode the crew must be sure that:

      -there is a time reserve for connecting and initial monitoring of ABSU;
      -All input parameters are set correctly;
      - ground support facilities are operating normally;
      -Airplane in the process of automatic approach moves along a predetermined path;
      - the parameters of the aircraft movement do not go beyond the limits specified in the RLE;
      -control of parameters of approach and mutual control of crew members is carried out in full;
      -Strictly performed crew work technology;
      - The crew created a calm, business-like atmosphere. wink
      1. FID
        FID 10 November 2016 13: 51
        +1
        Well, the "cost" of the pilot is higher than the cost of iron ... And, excuse me, which of the military airfields is equipped, at least with ILS? Yes, and the Ka-50 is a helicopter, turn off everything, it will sit in a corn field on autorotation. And ABSU-154 turns on on the ground, BEFORE TAKEOFF. Initial control of ABSU - what is it? And the automatic approach of the Tu-154M (emki, not bashki) to the decision-making height (60 m, if I'm not mistaken), then the PIC or the piloting crew member takes the steering wheel with the handles and lands the airplane ... Something like this, I think.
        1. opus
          opus 10 November 2016 14: 46
          +1
          Quote: SSI
          And, excuse me, which of the military airfields is equipped with at least ILS?

          Sevastopol exactly (they are combined)

          Like Dabolim, he personally saw the take-off of the 2x SU-30 MKI

          but I think a lot.
          CGS are divided into meter systems (ILS (instrument landing system)) and centimeter ranges (English MLS, microwave landing system - microwave landing system).
          In the USSR, the first serial CSC was the landing system SP-50 "Materik" of the 1950 of the year, which included the RD-1 repeater, the KRM-F directional phase beacon, the GRM-1 glide path beacon and the MRM-48 marker beacons. [4]. The SP-50 system was installed in the 1950's at a number of airfields of the USSR (both military and civilian), and it allowed landing of Li-2, Il-12, Il-14, Tu-4, Tu-16 aircraft with the meteorological minimum of 50x500 (the height of the lower boundary of the clouds is 50 m, the visibility range on the runway 500 m).

          The northern one was definitely not equipped, here is the president of Poland with his YAK -42 and "that".
          Quote: SSI
          and Ka-50 is a helicopter, turn off everything

          Who will disconnect if the pilot is not capable (and there is no system)?
          Quote: SSI
          And ABSU-154 turns on on the ground

          Yes, I just brought her about how it was!


          The following systems and technologies for aircraft landing are used in aviation:

          ILS: Instrument Landing System;
          GPS / GLONASS
          MLS: Microwave Landing System;
          RSP: radar landing system;

          VBLS: Visual Based Landing System.
          1. FID
            FID 10 November 2016 15: 43
            +2
            Quote: opus
            here is the president of Poland with his YAK -42 and "that"

            I beg your pardon, did you joke about the Yak-42? And about many military airfields with automatic landing systems? No need to write about the combined, not interesting. I can give you examples of "international" airports, where landings are only in the first category ...
            1. opus
              opus 10 November 2016 16: 47
              +2
              Quote: SSI
              I'm sorry, did you write about the Yak-42 for fun?

              154M- I forgot. Confused with the 044 board, although that Yak-40

              Smolensk-Severny airdrome has already been withdrawn from the Air Force, but has not yet been equipped with landing gear ..
              Quote: SSI
              And about many military airfields with automatic landing systems?

              Military airfields in Russia are practically not equipped with drive equipment so that military pilots train to land airplanes not only on airfields, but also on highways (except RSBN and PRMG). In general, to be assy, ​​and not serving a duty?

              But what about the course-glide path approach system “Katet” and the BS “Flight-0” (“Flight-1”)?

              Quote: SSI
              I can give you examples of "international"

              What for ? the question is not that.
              ACS "Postscript" and
              The Ministry of Defense intends to connect the Su-35С and Su-27СМ3 fighters .... need the system will be able fly a plane from the ground without a pilot
              1. FID
                FID 10 November 2016 17: 12
                +2
                I apologize! Recently there was an article about the Yak-130, which, allegedly, can be planted from the ground. I got excited! But also to control the plane from the ground, where is the crew ??? Well, he is not a drone! Why bring everything to the point of absurdity! Target designation and conclusion to the goal - THAT is what we should strive for ...
                1. opus
                  opus 10 November 2016 18: 25
                  +1
                  Quote: SSI
                  Recently there was an article about the Yak-130, which, allegedly, can be planted from the ground.

                  ik ..
                  maybe later? YAK-133BR (Proryv family UAVs: Proryv-U, Pro
                  snatch-R "," Proryv-RLD ")?
                  130 go Integrated complex of airborne equipment OPEN architecture.
                  Nevertheless, the control system for general aircraft equipment (SU OSO) (No. 8) is not bad there


                  Quote: SSI
                  HERE what to strive for ...

                  out of the corner of my ear (right or left), I heard that work on the OBE based on the scalable IMA on the interface of the "long" SpaceWire, as an answer to the Operationally Responsive Space Office, is in full swing.
                  NPC ELVIS OJSC
  7. afrikanez
    afrikanez 10 November 2016 15: 19
    +2
    Well, now "Postscript" will not allow anyone to hijack our plane, our "partners." Their mother, children ... negative
  8. sivuch
    sivuch 10 November 2016 16: 27
    0
    I think this is exactly this ACS
    http://www.rusarmy.com/forum/threads/navedenie-pe
    rexvatchika-v-avtomatizirovannom-rezhime. 11079 / pa
    ge-15
    Automated interceptor guidance
    We put a new ACS. I don’t remember the name, there are only two of them in Russia, in our country and in Krymsk.
    Boundary plan to replace. Yes, only cabins with jobs are on the street. They are based on Kamaz. Those. nobody is going to shove them underground.
    Inside these cabins are the new ACS, monitors, as in the A-50, which is after modernization.
    There is a whole block for interaction with the A-50.
    When I asked what it was, everyone was like: "Oooh! This is a new fucking technique of what generation, new technologies, with an obvious malice in their voice."
    Modifiers modify the devil already knows how many years.
    It works during flights, but nobody uses it, there are a lot of jambs. It just plows and that's it.
    In general, at the moment, Boundary is better, even with all its jambs.
    Although, of course, over the past 3 years they could have finalized
  9. Operator
    Operator 10 November 2016 19: 04
    0
    Some kind of desa (flies with cutlets) - the transfer of tactical data (digitally displayed on the tablets of pilots and staff officers at any level) with the control of aircraft (command line, is used to control UAVs) cannot be mixed in one system.

    The transmission of tactical data and the transmission of commands are fundamentally separated in network-centric systems (another separate functionality is the transmission of a surveillance video image from a satellite, UAV, ground and surface reconnaissance equipment - in the presence of a broadband communication channel).