Will the continuation of the dog waltz?
Salut Hillary did not take place, that they can appreciate, except, the attending physicians of the defeated candidate from the US Democratic Party. In fact, win the Clinton elections - the doctors would have to work hard (the case when both in the literal and figurative sense of the word) without holidays, weekends and holidays. For today the “patient” barks, tomorrow beats in hysterics, the day after tomorrow her legs on the carpet are knocked down, and against this background she needs to send domestic and foreign policy - to sow, as it were, the seeds of democracy from Washington to Mosul, from New York to Kiev, from Chicago to Aleppo and further everywhere ... What a dream for the attending physicians ... In general, the medical team "Injection for Hillary" sighed with relief and quietly in laboratory, in the image and likeness of the LDPR faction in the State Duma , raised a glass of sparkling.
However, if Hillary's physicians experienced a feeling of comprehensive relief, then the entire progressive democratic world was tense. After all, the very fact of the existence of this world was based on purely positive sensory experiences and the realization that somewhere over the ocean there is a “man-stone wall”, behind which you can hide in case something happens, if you need to actively podyvyvkat, for example, to Russia. Whether the wall was Mr. Obama is an open question, but at least they tried to fashion such an idol from him.
Tyavkali, as the great thinker of our time says - in combination with the mayor of Kiev - not only everything ... Baltic hotheads and hearts, including Red Dalu, Polish Matserevichi, Ukrainian knight of chocolate order, not to mention all sorts of holders of the banner of world democracy from London, Paris, Berlin, etc., etc. ...
So, if you try, God forbid, of course, find yourself in the shoes of those “partners” with whom all bets were placed on a mature anti-Russian policy with blind worship of the USA, then there is a lot of interesting things on the agenda. Naturally, the victory of Donald Trump in the elections, by definition, cannot mean a radical foreign policy reversal of the States, for the wedding general is also a wedding general to Washington. But the billionaire has already done a fair amount of rustling.
Ukrainian eagles (or roosters) Maidan fell into a stupor. The confusion looms in the Ukrainian press and the Ukrainian segment of social networks. Some shout that they will take Trump by the lapels of the jacket and teach them, you know, democracy, even through burning tires. Others wipe their comments on Facebook and Twitter, in which Trump, even when he was a candidate, were called either an agent of the Kremlin, or “uncressed block of wood”, or “candidate for garbage lustration”.
The confusion in the ranks of "democratised" persons (or individuals) is understandable. After all, these people are, to put it mildly, worried that Trump, as a person who, in fact, does not need any sponsorship, can at least try to conduct a relative policy independent of American lobbyists. Whether he can lead it or not is another matter. But this worm of anxiety sharpens the souls of people who have been grasping at the American hem all the time to at least somehow be close to “exclusivity”.
What did Ukraine remember? The first thing that surfaced was Trump's statement about his readiness to conduct a dialogue on the status of Crimea. In the order of hypotheses only, it is worth considering what if Trump at first really succeeds in bringing relations with Russia from the "lower base" level to an acceptable level? Indeed, then the fact itself looks like a “total zrad” for apologists for the Maidan. Trump knows how to count money and understands that to satisfy the financial appetites of the Kiev chain dogs just so that they, without ceasing, bark in the east direction, not at all in a businesslike way. It’s not profitable ... But there is weapons tycoons, including Trump's Republican Party colleagues, who, on the contrary, are very profitable. After the inauguration (and it was only in January 2017), the President of the United States will have to choose: either to lower these dogs from the chain in the direction they are in today, or to release them, but for all four sides, shutting, for example, credit door.
Lyashko still hopes that "curtsy to Putin is the election rhetoric of Trump." Nardep Gerashchenko declared that “the American Constitution is on guard of Ukrainian democracy, which does not allow the president to be a tyrant of the tyrant”. A strong statement, isn't it? ..
The American constitution defending the Ukrainian "democracy" is five points ...
And this statement in the social network of the spokesperson for the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine Larisa Sargan:
Nardep VRU Mustafa Nayem outlined in advance the likely "fate of Trump" with the projection of the situation in Ukraine:
What exactly? Hire lucky your buns in Times Square? ..
And what would you do to the Baltic "tigers" who today only live by the promises of the secretary general and other NATO functionaries, according to which the number of NATO "warriors of light" on the amber-spratsky coast should be changed only upwards ... But if it’s all the same Trump decides to set off excess steam in relations with Moscow (even if only a little), then this is a political coma (or, as it is now fashionable to say in the US, Komi ...) for the Baltic authorities. Who is called “preparing for aggression,” who is to be blamed for all mortal sins for “new attempts at occupation”? Whom? .. North Korea, Iran, China? .. Who does a political career do, after all? ..
A dog waltz can break out of rhythm ...
Well, now it’s still time to get away from these “partner” wails and look at the realities. In what cases did the newly elected US presidents favor our country? It was only in cases where the Russian (Soviet) policy was exactly in the wake of the American policy. When in the chair of the Minister of Foreign Affairs we were sitting in the format of Shevardnadze and Kozyrev, when the subsoil was sold to crooks like Browder, and when “leaders” were at the head of the state who offered to take the regions “as much sovereignty as they can”. The current Russian policy, with all its pitfalls and nuances, is far from following overseas directives. Therefore, the newly elected US President can get a tickling from “his own” with “forks” so that he does not particularly “handle” with Russia. It is enough examples - to take the same Boris Johnson, who on federal TV channels of the Russian Federation was almost idolized, calling him “a man with his opinion”, “an outstanding intellectual”. Today this “intellectual” has landed in the British mainstream and gives out something that is not out of touch with the framework of all-Western anti-Russian policy.
Will billionaire Trump go in about the same? Considering the fact that with some very strange reverence in our country, individual representatives of the authorities took to his victory, after the inauguration, it will be quite possible to expect not entirely pleasant surprises. Including the performance of dog waltz pirouettes by Baltic, Ukrainian and other partners ... Pessimism? No, no ... realism ...
- Alexei Volodin
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.