Turbines, mounted on the "Kerch", rearranged to "Ladny"

56
Ukrainian-made marching engines will be transferred from the anti-submarine ship Kerch, which did not sail at sea after the 2014 g fire, to the guard ship Ladny, reports Flotprom.

Turbines, mounted on the "Kerch", rearranged to "Ladny"




According to a source on the Black Sea navy, such a decision was made on the basis that the Kerch turbines are in good condition, while at Ladny they have already exhausted their resources.

“At one time, new turbines were loaded onto Kerch, immediately after buying them from Ukraine, the ship didn’t even go anywhere,” said the source.

According to him, “the engines with the already dismantled by the workers of the 13 ship repair plant and the Turborus enterprise in Rybinsk have now been dismantled, and their installation on the Laidny SKR will soon begin.

It is noted that the turbines were purchased before the rupture of military-technical cooperation with Ukraine.

“Kerch” was put into operation in 1974, the ship displacement - 8,5 thousand tons, speed - up to 33 nodes, cruising range - up to 8 thousand miles, crew - 430 people.

Help resource: "Fire on BOD" Kerch "occurred in November 2014, when the ship was under scheduled maintenance in the waters of the" 13 ship repair plant. " In case of fire, the main damage was caused to the engine room. After that, the media reported that the ship will be disposed of ".
  • http://sevastopol.su
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    9 November 2016 11: 50
    "L A D N Y Y" These beautiful names were previously given to ships, and most importantly, wisely. God forbid, the ship died, so "Ladny" died, not "Admiral ......", "Moscow" or "Russia".
    And I wish "Okay" that the turbines of the heroic "Kerch" would "fall in time for him" and that he would serve the Fatherland more than once and, of course, SEVEN FEET UNDER THE KEEL.
    1. +10
      9 November 2016 12: 03
      The ship burned down, but the turbines remained. Let's hope they bring good luck to Okay. The fact that Trump has come does not mean a great warming to Russia from the Western world, and they still have the loot with a bunch of other resources. I would like "Ladny" to help redistribute something in our favor.
      1. +6
        9 November 2016 12: 14
        Of course, this is not from a good life .. The fact remains that there is no domestic turbine, and most likely will not be soon. The construction of new ships will be stopped, of course there will be a solution to the Chinese, but these are new projects for their turbines ..
        1. +2
          9 November 2016 13: 11
          Do the Chinese have their own turbines?
          1. +6
            9 November 2016 13: 12
            Ali has EVERYTHING, even if not his own.
        2. avt
          +1
          9 November 2016 13: 59
          Quote: 210ox
          Of course, this is not from a good life .. The fact remains that there is no domestic turbine,

          laughing On the old ship a new turbine! ?? wassat Do you have any idea of ​​fleet property funds?
    2. +1
      9 November 2016 13: 32
      Quote: svp67
      And "Okay" I wish that the turbines of the heroic "Kerch" would "come in time"

      I join the wishes, but .. second-hand, however. request
      1. +2
        9 November 2016 16: 33
        Quote: Bayonet
        Quote: svp67
        And "Okay" I wish that the turbines of the heroic "Kerch" would "come in time"

        I join the wishes, but .. second-hand, however. request

        Not however import substitution.
        1. 0
          9 November 2016 16: 52
          Quote: lis-ik
          Not however import substitution.

          Second hand (from the English. Second hand - second hand) - a modern term meaning: used property ... hi
          1. 0
            9 November 2016 17: 04
            I know what second-hand is, it’s a pity that you don’t understand humor.
    3. 0
      10 November 2016 08: 56
      As far as I understand, ships of different classes in the fleet are given names of different types - a different trifle is called adjective. And large ones - by names.
  2. +6
    9 November 2016 11: 52
    All this is good, but it's better to do your turbines! wink
    1. +3
      9 November 2016 12: 06
      Quote: ded100
      All this is good, but do your turbines better!

      Who said that this is bad ... that's just the moment, we missed, and now we are forced to "catch up and overtake", and this all takes time and money.
    2. +4
      9 November 2016 12: 07
      better
      wassat

      Made laugh. Thank.
      1. +3
        9 November 2016 12: 16
        C'mon, Temples .. A man has done a dirty copy .. Both by + ..
  3. +1
    9 November 2016 11: 52
    When will our turbines go into production ...?
    1. +2
      9 November 2016 12: 02
      Quote: Pulya
      When will our turbines go into production ...?

      Who argues. They will be in a year or two, but not now, unfortunately.
      1. +1
        9 November 2016 12: 09
        And there is more detailed information, at what stage are work on the creation of Russian turbines for ships?
        1. +3
          9 November 2016 13: 23
          At the stage of cuts and kickbacks, judging by the incoming information.
          1. 0
            9 November 2016 14: 07
            Prove the specifics.
        2. 0
          9 November 2016 14: 37
          In Rybinsk, a stand for testing turbines is being built, which means that design is underway. We slapped a moment with them of course. hi
          1. 0
            10 November 2016 08: 58
            Well, we had so much to build and replace, that we decided at first to leave the Ukrainians everything that they can still do, and ourselves to build what we never knew how to. So everyone did the right thing as a whole. Just not everyone had time.
      2. win
        +2
        9 November 2016 12: 10
        When will our turbines go into production ...?

        Will be in a year or two

        Tupolev in a sharashka for a short time copied the best at that time the United States bomber.
        And now the engine from Ukraine cannot ...
        1. +4
          9 November 2016 12: 21
          And now the engine from Ukraine cannot ...

          Well it would be that from Ukraine, otherwise everyone was hurt by the Soviets.
        2. FID
          +5
          9 November 2016 12: 52
          Quote: Siegen
          Tupolev in a sharashka for a short time copied the best at that time the United States bomber.

          Are you sure you are in "sharashka"?
          1. 0
            9 November 2016 16: 19
            Quote: SSI
            Are you sure you are in "sharashka"?

            And his conditions were as in a sharashka, it is said to copy over 2 years, or not ...
            In May 1945, Stalin gave Tupolev the broadest powers, but severely limited it in time: he wanted to see a new plane by mid-1947.
            In the spring of 1947, the first Tu-4 was ready for flight. He first took off on May 9, 1947. Although various tests continued until 1949, the bomber was immediately put into serial production.

        3. 0
          9 November 2016 13: 07
          As if there is our analogue: M98, but where is he
        4. +5
          9 November 2016 13: 15
          Siegen .... Tupolev in sharashka for a short time copied the best at that time the US bomber.

          But, but ...! Tupolev was already working at freedom. Created a new type of Tu-64 bomber for an atomic bomb, but he did not have time. When 3 American B-29s were overtaken from the Far East, Stalin personally gave the task to Tupolev to copy the B-29, but Tupolev tried to dissuade him, citing that the Tu-64 would be better, to which Stalin reacted: ". When asked how long it would take to make a copy, Tupolev replied - 3 years, Stalin said, I'll give you 2 years. The task was completed successfully. But that's another story, the story of creating a new direction in the aviation industry. hi
          1. FID
            +2
            9 November 2016 13: 58
            Quote: askort154
            But, but ...!

            Hi Sasha!
            1. 0
              9 November 2016 14: 06
              Mutually, Serge!
        5. +1
          9 November 2016 13: 23
          Quote: Siegen
          Tupolev in a sharashka for a short time copied the best at that time the United States bomber.
          And now the engine from Ukraine cannot ...

          I copied it in short, but in a series he went, after almost four years, and by the way with domestic engines that were already ready.
        6. AUL
          0
          9 November 2016 18: 56
          Tupolev in a sharashka for a short time copied the best at that time the United States bomber.
          At that time, Tupolev was led (not directly, of course) by L.P. Beria. Now the process is driven by effective managers. Feel the difference!
    2. +1
      9 November 2016 12: 05
      Car engine in a series of new run problem. But work is ongoing. Good luck to the fishermen!
      1. 0
        9 November 2016 14: 09
        Which motor do you mean? In Yaroslavl, a whole plant was launched, where 4 and 6 cylinder diesels are made from ZERO.
    3. 0
      9 November 2016 13: 34
      Quote: Pulya
      When will our turbines go into series ..

      We will have everything! fellow After 2020. wink
  4. +4
    9 November 2016 11: 52
    It’s an entirely acceptable solution, because Kerch, probably, was at the joke forever, and Ladny still needs to run and run. We wish a speedy installation of turbines on Ladny, and that he set out to sea as soon as possible.
    1. +3
      10 November 2016 04: 21
      And damn it, I am terribly sorry for these wonderful "boxes" of project 1134. "Azov", "Ochakov", "Kerch", "Tashkent" and further down the list. They were beautiful and powerful ships, and they served faithfully for many years in the thick of sea events. It's even scary to imagine how many sailors these ships have become relatives for life.
      PS And yet, 11thirty-fours, even after their actual death, as a warship, continue to fight. "Ochakov" - Donuzlav blocked with his body, "Kerch" - the heart gives.
  5. +3
    9 November 2016 11: 53
    For the ship "Kerch" it definitely means death .... (in service since 1974 and now as a donor).
  6. +5
    9 November 2016 12: 00
    Marching engines of Ukrainian production will be transferred from the anti-submarine ship "Kerch", which did not go to sea after a fire in 2014, to the patrol ship "Ladny"

    Considering that the Ladnoye's displacement is 2 and a half times less (3200 versus 8400), it will probably be the fastest of the large ships of the Russian Navy. winked
    1. +1
      9 November 2016 12: 08
      Quote: K-50
      he will probably be the fastest of the large ships of the Russian Navy.

      Well this will be the fastest on the Syrian Express
    2. +8
      9 November 2016 12: 28
      Quote: K-50

      Considering that the Ladnoye's displacement is 2 and a half times less (3200 versus 8400), it will probably be the fastest of the large ships of the Russian Navy. winked

      Don't write nonsense! The ship will be the way it was created and designed, as far as the hardware allows. Guided by your logic, if, purely hypothetically, you push the turbines from Kerch into Buyan, then he will take off, like an ekranoplan! Well, nonsense!
      1. +2
        9 November 2016 13: 24
        Quote: Rokossovsky
        Don't write nonsense! The ship will be the way it was created and designed, as far as the hardware allows. Guided by your logic, if, purely hypothetically, you push the turbines from Kerch into Buyan, then he will take off, like an ekranoplan! Well, nonsense!

        There is such a thing - specific power. Other things being equal, its increase affects the acceleration and speed characteristics in the direction of increase. This is not nonsense, this is elementary physics.
        I don’t write that it will take off, it will be a couple of knots faster, maybe 35-36 max. On the economic course, it is POSSIBLE to reduce fuel consumption. This is also simple physics. If you are not familiar with it, then you should study in a new way at school, or at least read, repeat it. request hi
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          9 November 2016 14: 23
          Quote: K-50

          I don’t write that it will take off, it will be a couple of knots faster, maybe 35-36 max. On the economic course, it is POSSIBLE to reduce fuel consumption. This is also simple physics. If you are not familiar with it, then you should study in a new way at school, or at least read, repeat it. request hi


          First of all, Alexey, you don’t send me to school, I have unlearned my higher technical and understand physical processes!

          Secondly, take an interest in the age of Okay, and then show me that hero who dares to squeeze at least 30 nodes out of him!
          For efficiency, I agree.
          And this:
          There is such a thing - specific power. Other things being equal, its increase affects the acceleration and speed characteristics in the direction of increase. This is not nonsense, this is elementary physics.

          without calculations no more than your Wishlist and fantasies!
          Yours! hi
          1. +1
            9 November 2016 14: 49
            Quote: Rokossovsky
            take an interest in the age of Okay, and then show me that hero who dares to squeeze at least 30 knots out of him!

            During WWII, in my opinion, there was a destroyer leader in the Italian fleet, comparable to the "Ladny" displacement. He walked 42 knots.
            Nothing will prevent, except for the power-to-weight ratio, "Ladnoy" to develop a slightly lower speed, all the more "heart" it will get "from scratch", the flies did not sit.
            If a decision was made on remotorization, then apparently the condition of the body satisfied the commission that made this decision. Here kickbacks will not help, the commission is statewide and who made the decision is known. So in case of any inconsistencies in the case, there will be someone to ask and who to punish.
            With our limited composition of the fleet, such a gross mistake is unlikely to be let down on the brakes.
            We will wait for a long and successful service from "Ladny". hi
  7. +1
    9 November 2016 12: 16
    Absolutely the right decision! "Okay" will still need them more.
    Here everyone is shouting that there are still no "own" turbines ... tell the stupid "Zorevskie" to copy? What the hell?
    After all, they were designed in the 70s and 80s and were outdated, like "omno mammoths", with Rolls and Praits, and they did not stand next to either in fuel consumption or in power.
    Therefore, there are none of them, because in fact, you need to do a new one and no worse than RR or PW ... and this is time and money!
    1. FID
      +5
      9 November 2016 12: 57
      Quote: kepmor
      with Rolls and Priit and with no one stood neither in fuel consumption nor in power.

      Are you sure that the listed companies create SHIP rather than AVIATION equipment? Are you a specialist in evaluating the power and fuel consumption? Share information, please ...
      1. +3
        9 November 2016 15: 00
        Quote: SSI
        Are you sure that the listed companies create SHIP rather than AVIATION equipment?


        RR definitely does. At Queen Elizabeth their turbines are standing. They do a lot for the sea: steering cars, azipode engines (for example, on the Mistral), diesel engines.
        About PW did not hear.
  8. +1
    9 November 2016 12: 17
    Quote: ded100
    All this is good, but it's better to do your turbines! wink

    Undeniable. But he is glad that Ladny is now with a new heart, which means he will still serve! And oh, how needed today!
  9. +3
    9 November 2016 12: 34
    Quote: K-50
    Marching engines of Ukrainian production will be transferred from the anti-submarine ship "Kerch", which did not go to sea after a fire in 2014, to the patrol ship "Ladny"

    Considering that the Ladnoye's displacement is 2 and a half times less (3200 versus 8400), it will probably be the fastest of the large ships of the Russian Navy. winked

    But this is unlikely ... Kerch had 4 turbines d59, if not mistaken. And Ladny has one d59 and one afterburner. They will put two and two either in a warehouse, or on another ship, or on spare parts. A Ladny without an afterburner will be the loser ...
  10. +2
    9 November 2016 13: 10
    And turn Kerch into a museum. Very beautiful ship.
  11. +4
    9 November 2016 13: 10
    The nephew on the "Ladnoye" served a conscription, when the Crimea was annexed, the same old ship was under repair in Sevastopol.
    1. +1
      9 November 2016 14: 11
      A little younger than Kerch.
    2. 0
      10 November 2016 20: 48
      Petrels built in the 70s. My "Reasonable", for example, entered service in 74th
  12. +1
    10 November 2016 00: 59
    Well, tricks ... Now the first experienced Rybins are stuck, and they are testing, in vain there are people from there.
  13. 0
    10 November 2016 14: 05
    Well, let it be so. And our turbines are already being tested and will soon be delivered to the fleet.
  14. +2
    10 November 2016 20: 30
    The last BOD, pr. 1134B, it seems that they will soon start up the metal ... Successful project, my father commanded one of this magnificent seven

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"