Results of the week. "To whom is the prologue, and to whom is the epilogue"
One peck, and no tank
The media is “boiling” with respect to the first long-range cruise of the AUG of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria, and in the meantime new intriguing details are opened concerning the strike weapons deployed on the basis of the 279-th separate naval fighter regiment deployed on board the Admiral Kuznetsov TAVKR.
It is known that the multipurpose MiG-29K / KUB with a rich nomenclature of missile-bomb armament will form the strike base of the deck wing, and several advanced Su-33 equipped with high-precision SVP-24-33 “Gefest” will have air cover and additional work on ground targets. The composition of the armament of the Ka-52K Katran naval attack helicopters has not been disclosed until recently, however, the Internet version of Izvestia revealed some details to 26 in October: the pilots will receive the Hermes-A (Klevok-A) anti-tank missile system.
The uniqueness of the Hermes-A, the land and ship versions of which will also later appear on the armament of the Russian Army, is beyond doubt. After equipping a more powerful solid-fuel first stage, the range of a Russian tactical missile can be about 100 km, and the Hermes will turn into one of the most advanced and compact means of air attack.
Comments from our readers:
GSH-18
Monarchist
Vlad5307
War criminal show face
US State Department spokesman John Kirby said at a briefing that the American coalition bombed terrorists and extremists exclusively, while Russia and Syria "are attacking civilians, including oppositionists." According to Kirby, there are practically no terrorists in Aleppo, while Russia and Syria are attacking the “moderate opposition” and civilians.
Mr. Kirby must not have read the statement of the UN special envoy to resolve the conflict in Syria, Staffan de Mistura. This man identified the “moderate rebels” with the terrorists: the named “rebels” lead indiscriminate shelling of the western quarters in Aleppo, as well as the corridors along which civilians want to go. Mistura noted that such actions of the "rebels" should be considered as unequivocal war crimes.
Mr. Kirby along with his boss in this case should be classified as people covering war criminals.
By the way, the Syrian news agency SANA reports on the use by militants of terrorist groups, persistently called by the West "moderate opposition", chemical weapons. Militants fired shells with toxic substances quarter, which is the military academy of Aleppo. Mr Kirby did not notice.
Comments from our readers:
Giant thought
1536
Mountain shooter
Banishing liberoids
Obama in a puddle
The Russian Ministry of Defense has notified the Pentagon that attempts by the US Air Force to bomb targets in Syria without permission from the Kremlin will receive a forceful response, they write in the West. Foreign analysts conclude: Putin has achieved strategic goals in Syria. He saved the Assad regime, and the Americans managed to portray the villains who support the terrorists. Obama with his policy sat in a puddle.
John Schindler in Observer, in fact, recognized Putin as the winner in Syria. The author drew a parallel between the situation in Syria and historical situation in the former Yugoslavia. Both confrontations in ethnically and religiously diverse states "were unnatural." Yugoslavia actually broke up exactly 20 years before Syria began to boil, but the conflicts that led to the disaster of the two states now seem similar: a cruel mishmash of opposing groups, religious and ethnic extremism, contempt for civilians. There is a difference: Russia helping Assad can change the outcome of the conflict in Syria.
True, the author of the material in the Observer does not consider that Putin and his ministers are “strategic geniuses”. Not at all. Putin and his ministers "acted cynically and cunningly in Syria," but the White House, which failed, gave the opportunity to them, whose owner demonstrated "stunning, unprecedented foreign policy incompetence." Again and again, Obama and his entourage made mistakes and eventually turned foreign policy into some kind of amateur activity. These losers were again and again conquered by Russians who looked at American politicians "with undisguised contempt."
Comments from our readers:
egor-kz
Ustrushan
uskrabut
Sarah, we are not alone
The Israeli publication mako.co.il publishes material in which it argues that "there is a growing likelihood of conflict" between Israel and Russia. The newspaper writes that the strengthening of Russia's military presence in the region is worrying the Israeli military, since "for the first time in 40 years, the Israeli Air Force and Navy in the region are not alone and do not have full control."
The publication refers to some representatives of the armed forces of the country, who "in private conversations" declare their surprise about the quantity and quality of Russian weapons and military equipment operating "near the borders of Israel." The portal reports that the Israeli army is actually accustomed to complete freedom of action in the region: on land, at sea and in the air. Now, for example, the Israeli military pilots are forced to act with an eye to the fact that Russia has the latest air defense systems in Syria.
According to the author of the article in the Israeli media, “the clash between Israel and Russia” is only a matter of time.
Two or three more such articles, and the rumor will reach the “international media”, where it will be corrected and edited so that the globe will become clear: Muscovites, dug “near the borders of Israel”, are threatened with “complete control” of Tel Aviv. Further, of course, followed by the annexation of Israel and its accession to the Jewish Autonomous Region.
Comments from our readers:
Kasym
Ingvar 72
Maki Avellevich
Temples
Sorry, but you are to blame
On Saturday last week, the story of how an American aircraft type AWACS (aviation detection and guidance complex), coming out of its train in the sky of Syria, approached about half a kilometer (according to other information, about half a mile) to the Russian fighter Su -35. Perhaps, for the first time in recent years, the American side decided to apologize for breaking the flight regime (leaving the train). Given the deepest American confidence in their own infallibility and planetary exclusivity, it draws on a sensation. However, realizing that they themselves create a precedent, the Americans immediately decided to play back.
A representative of the so-called American coalition operating in Syria, said that the guilty party “should be considered a Russian pilot,” but the Americans decided to “have mercy” on the “unlucky Russian pilot” and declared that his actions were not premeditated ...
Well, we are waiting for the third statement from the Americans: that the Russian pilot showed a “low level of professionalism,” or even real “unprofessionalism,” violated the rules of peaceful life in the sky and generally planned to circle Syria, and then sharply turn, fly to Washington and shoot the White House, where the main peacemaker of the planet lives in the last weeks.
Comments from our readers:
dmi.pris
Tatar 174
Altona
Hybrid warfare in the canteen
The publication of The Telegraph colorfully tells about the incident that occurred with representatives of the British military contingent in Latvia. A couple of royal warriors who ate hamburgers in the McDonalds canteen were attacked suddenly. Bottom line: beatings and injuries. Who inflicted? There is a version! British journalists argue that the attack was carried out in the framework of the “hybrid war of Russia against Western countries, in particular, Britain.”
Moreover, the British media claims that those who attacked the valiant soldiers of Her Majesty with their fists, then "disappeared into the office of the media, known for its pro-Russian views." The fight in the catering establishment is very agile and mobile people managed to shoot a video camera. True, the name of the media with "pro-Russian views" is not mentioned. And the address is not specified.
The NATO soldier biomass, which for some time has settled in Latvia, behaves ugly in the republic, for which, it must be supposed, it gets into the snout. NATO members urinate on the flower beds, on the statues, arrange dances on the roof of a taxi and take off their pants in front of the cafe windows. NATO members, we note, not Russian.
Comments from our readers:
Major Yurik
Monos
AlexTires
Good commission
On Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal, having managed to get ahead of its European colleagues, published a report that the European Commission had allowed the Russian concern Gazprom to increase the load on the OPAL gas pipeline. News This somehow did not become a sensation. European media sluggishly duplicated it, but refrained from commenting.
To be precise, the European Commission allowed the Russian concern to use OPAL on 90% of its capacity. I would allow everything to 100, but for the time being the European officials are “holding their face,” notes G. Granovsky.
The reason is simple: in recent years, when the Cold War was revived, the OPAL gas pipeline was for Europeans not only an infrastructure object, but also a means of deterring Gazprom’s export plans. After all, the attacks on Gazprom are one of the best ways to pressure Russia, highly dependent on the supply of raw materials abroad.
With the Russian gas pipeline helped ... Ukraine. The European Commission did not play political games with the people of Kiev who are not in a hurry to fill gas storages with Russian gas and are demanding money from the EU, and as much as possible opened the gas valve for Gazprom’s access to the countries where hydrocarbon supplies were threatened by Ukraine. The bargaining of the gas company turned out to be inappropriate for the EU, as it was supposed. There wasn’t enough Brussels to depend on Kiev’s position!
The political and economic outcome is clear: the European Commission, by its decision, has made it clear who Europe can really count on and who is a reliable partner for it.
Comments from our readers:
Finches
Masya masya
nik1321
rasteer
Counterintelligence went public
Russia poses a growing threat to the stability of Britain and uses all the modern means at its disposal to achieve its goals, said Andrew Parker, director general of the British Security Service, to The Guardian.
By the way, this man became the first general director among all the chiefs of MI5, who agreed to give interviews to journalists. This was not the 107 years of service!
According to MI5, Moscow uses a variety of means and methods to “promote its foreign policy” in foreign countries. Russian spying, sabotage, cyber attacks and propaganda. So it happens "throughout Europe and the UK."
Earlier, Mr. Parker stated that his agency has reasons to make part of MI5’s activities public: “We must find an approach to people, develop public relations and involve citizens in the service as agents, to work for us.”
Obviously, we add, the head of the British counterintelligence service found a convenient excuse both for expanding the activities and staff of his service, and for making excuses before an incorruptible court and a tumultuous British civil society, and at the same time to some extent even before Snowden, whose documents are in 2013. It was published in The Gurdian (the newspaper did not fear the wrath of the Prime Minister himself). The reason is the “Russian threat”, which no one thought about in 2013.
The strange thing is that the head of MI5 was revealed to the press only at the end of 2016. And such a headache is headed by a powerful intelligence service, who dreams of defeating the Russians?
It is not surprising that this man did not name in an interview any Russian spy-saboteur caught in the last three years, sent to London by comrade Putin.
Comments from our readers:
hirurg
sl22277
Skeptic Self-Taught
Commonwealth №4
Lawmakers in Kiev and Warsaw recently adopted a joint resolution “On the Declaration of Memory and Solidarity of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine”. Announcing this event, the politicians of the two countries talked about a trilateral political action, to which the deputies of the Lithuanian Seimas should join. On this occasion, the chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Andrey Paruby, even made a special statement. He noted that the Seimas International Affairs Committee had already supported the text of the declaration. Ukrainian deputies nodded to Parubiy approvingly, paying little attention to the fact that the election campaign was over in Lithuania, and a different composition of the deputies of the Lithuanian parliament should give an assessment of the joint declaration, observer G. Granovsky notes.
The Seimas deputies did not accidentally mention the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in their resolution. In fact, the tragic events of 1943 took place in the occupied territory of Soviet Ukraine. As you know, Volyn only until 1939, was part of Poland. During the war, fascist henchmen hosted here - Ukrainian nationalists.
Poland persistently promotes its idea to return the lands lost before the war and form the fourth Rzeczpospolita. The provisions on the illegality of the rejection of its eastern territories and the "crime" of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact have already been entrenched in the PACE and European Parliament documents. Now they are migrating to bilateral agreements with their neighbors.
The politicians of old Europe refer to the eastern plans of Poland with a certain degree of condescension and call them not “strategy”, but “improvisation”.
Comments from our readers:
Locomotive
Nyrobsky
pts-m
The quantity is, the matter of quality?
“Recently, in various media outlets in the West and in Russia, more and more often there is an interesting topic from the point of view of exactly what I wrote above. Theme forced peace of Ukraine. Donbass nothing to fear. APU and punishers have nothing and nothing to shoot. They buried the Ukrainian Armed Forces before the deadline, ”write military experts A. Staver and R. Skomorokhov.
In fact, although they write about the absence of soldiers for the ATO (about the lack of personnel in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and law enforcement agencies), the influx takes place: “And for a compulsory conscription, and, oddly enough, they go completely to themselves voluntarily. And not disabled people go at all, but quite healthy young guys. Those who worked in the factories the day before yesterday, but today are simply out of work. Not everyone has the opportunity to trade in the market, and the purchasing power in Ukraine today is not the same. And the army is a place where a person will be guaranteed to be provided with everything (or almost everything) necessary. By the way, about the same situation in LDNR. Even worse. ”
Therefore, in today's Ukraine there is someone to serve. How to serve is another quality issue. As for the quantity, Kiev has enough ammunition as well as soldiers.
Comments from our readers:
Ustrushan
Homo
Retvizan
The people and the party are one
On October 31, during the meeting of the Council on Interethnic Relations in Astrakhan, Vladimir Putin supported the idea of the need to “work on the adoption” of the law on the unity of the Russian nation. Vladimir Putin is quoted as saying by TASS: “What exactly is absolutely possible and necessary to implement, right above this, you need to think about it and in practical terms, start working - this is the law on the Russian nation. Good offer".
Some time ago, Vyacheslav Mikhailov, head of the department of national and federative relations of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service, voiced a proposal to state men to consider the adoption of the law “On the Russian Nation and the Management of Inter-Ethnic Relations”. The name of a possible future law also belongs to Vyacheslav Mikhailov, who at one time served as Minister for Nationalities Affairs, and who today advocates changing the Constitution in terms of introducing into it the concept of the same “Russian nation”.
According to Mikhailov, the state must determine the ideological line in order to continue development. At the same time, Mikhailov believes that the idea should be as fundamental as the idea of building communism. If in a nutshell, the Russian nation is offered not to “pull down from above” in the form of a “pointer”, but rather to build: the citizen of the Russian Federation should be conscious that he is primarily a citizen of Russia with his nationality.
You would think the idea of communism was not lowered from above! Remember the slogan: "Things and thoughts of Ilyich will survive the centuries"? Centuries really survived the affairs and thoughts of Lenin. Yes, there is a century, a few decades is enough.
No foundation, especially Marxist, in the construction of "communism" and did not smell. To build, and without a foundation, it was possible only that state capitalism, which Grandfather Lenin preached. Very unstable structure came out.
And here is a much more complicated question - the nation. It cannot be defined by any law there. There was a law - got the nation. It's as funny as waiting for communism for the 1980 year or a separate apartment for the 2000 year.
And how should one speak to a Russian person about oneself? "I am Russian Russian"? Or "I am Russian Russian"?
Mikhailov's “good offer” is nothing more than an attempt to replace the historically dead definition of “Soviet” with the definition of “Russian”. The imperial vision of the future of Russia is obvious here. With the difference that the word "Soviet" came for history, and did not run ahead of it. Moreover, the ideologists of the law of unity hardly have any idea about the replacement of communism. Perhaps instead of communism we substitute oligarchic capitalism and corruption?
Although, of course, the law must be taken. In the end, we already have a “united” party, and the people cannot be left behind from the party in terms of unity.
Comments from our readers:
siberalt
Tatar 174
kit_bellew
Chechnya is on its feet
The proposal of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation on the budget of Chechnya for the next year, suggesting a reduction in expenses, is unacceptable for the republic, RIA Novosti reports Ramzan Kadyrov’s statement.
The head of the republic noted that Chechnya is “only now on its feet,” but there are still a lot of problems. “Chechnya is among the two only regions where there are three shifts in schools. We restored the facilities, but after that the most difficult part begins - to purchase equipment, to train specialists. We need to develop the main directions of the economy, ”he said at the budget meeting.
Commenting on Kadyrov’s statement and the budget theme, the press secretary of the Russian president, Dmitry Peskov, used the expression “substance”.
"This is a topic of argumentation, this question is not simply related to the interest of one subject of the Russian Federation, it is a question of the country's general budget, a rather complicated substance, where all aspects should be taken into account, which, in fact, will occur in the State Duma," the press secretary quotes Interfax.
Comments from our readers:
tsvetkov1274
Vend
IrbisRus
Gur
230 million and censorship
This week was made a sensational statement by K. A. Raikin about the “censorship” in Russia: “... I am very worried - I think, like you all - those phenomena that occur in our life. These, so to speak, assaults on art, on theater, in particular. These are completely lawless, extremist, arrogant, aggressive, hiding behind the words about morality, about morality, and in general with all sorts of, so to speak, good and lofty words: “patriotism”, “Motherland” and “high morality”.
Why not even submit to censorship? Whose money?
According to media reports, in 2016, the Satirikon Theater, headed by Konstantin Arkadyevich, received more than 230 million rubles from the budget! It means that Konstantin Arkadyevich needs to keep his mouth shut. And do what they say.
As economists say, the market is simple but tough. Put performances without budget funding. Based on market self-sufficiency and profitability. Will this theater, consuming such sums, remain afloat? Clearly not. Is censorship really to blame?
Comments from our readers:
Jarilo
siberalt
Alex_1973
Era robots-killers
Whoever wins the presidential election in the United States, he will have to despise diplomacy and start a war with Russia. Journalists and analysts hint at this in their materials, believing that after the elections, Washington will advance with “aggressive politics”. What war will begin? Nuclear? No, military experts are predicting an era of killer robots. Thousands of quadcopters with on board explosives will fly into the air. In such a reality, humanity will be in two years.
Obviously, Western analysts, military and computer science professors have decided on the unenviable future that awaits the unfortunate planet.
Since diplomacy in the United States turned into a formal institution, needed only to call for peace after the war, it is Washington’s “aggressive policy” that will become the prologue to the start of the third world war in which the United States, Russia and China can clash.
In view of the fact that no one wants to start a nuclear war, and also because the technologies drones are rapidly developing and improving, a new war will be fought with the help of flocks of quadrocopters and similar means that recognize and destroy people, tanks and even ships "automatically", that is, without human intervention.
American commanders without fear and reproach of conscience will send such flocks to the attack: there is no risk to people's lives.
Comments from our readers:
Mountain shooter
Skeptic Self-Taught
your1970
Alex_1973
cap
* "To whom the prologue, and to whom and the epilogue." - a phrase from the movie “Days of the Turbins”
The media is “boiling” with respect to the first long-range cruise of the AUG of the Russian Navy to the shores of Syria, and in the meantime new intriguing details are opened concerning the strike weapons deployed on the basis of the 279-th separate naval fighter regiment deployed on board the Admiral Kuznetsov TAVKR.
It is known that the multipurpose MiG-29K / KUB with a rich nomenclature of missile-bomb armament will form the strike base of the deck wing, and several advanced Su-33 equipped with high-precision SVP-24-33 “Gefest” will have air cover and additional work on ground targets. The composition of the armament of the Ka-52K Katran naval attack helicopters has not been disclosed until recently, however, the Internet version of Izvestia revealed some details to 26 in October: the pilots will receive the Hermes-A (Klevok-A) anti-tank missile system.
The uniqueness of the Hermes-A, the land and ship versions of which will also later appear on the armament of the Russian Army, is beyond doubt. After equipping a more powerful solid-fuel first stage, the range of a Russian tactical missile can be about 100 km, and the Hermes will turn into one of the most advanced and compact means of air attack.
Comments from our readers:
GSH-18
I remember that in the comments to any article about aircraft carriers there have been a lot of screams like “Yes, what for are these floating barges with airplanes ??? !!! These are floating targets, terribly expensive and useless for our fleet! " And then came the fierce nonsense (as evidence), which I do not want to bring.
And practice now shows us that we cannot do without aircraft carriers in the future. And at least one or two things we have to stand on the "siding" in any case.
And practice now shows us that we cannot do without aircraft carriers in the future. And at least one or two things we have to stand on the "siding" in any case.
Monarchist
I understand this: MiGs, "Dryers" and "Katrans" should be aired in the minds of some gentlemen. Airing is good for health, so "Grasshopper" and came to air. So to say, delivery service.
Vlad5307
Well, what can you say? Good luck in the application of new products and to work reliably and accurately, and the identified shortcomings (better without them) are fixed in the shortest possible time! Our defense d. B. reliable and effective in countering the global foe. Our diplomats do not interfere with the military to do their job firmly and irresistibly for the enemy.
War criminal show face
US State Department spokesman John Kirby said at a briefing that the American coalition bombed terrorists and extremists exclusively, while Russia and Syria "are attacking civilians, including oppositionists." According to Kirby, there are practically no terrorists in Aleppo, while Russia and Syria are attacking the “moderate opposition” and civilians.
Kirby: "In Mosul, we bomb terrorists, and in Aleppo, Russia and Syria bomb the opposition and civilians"
The use of chemical weapons by militants in Aleppo do not see, Russian submarines see...
The use of chemical weapons by militants in Aleppo do not see, Russian submarines see...
Mr. Kirby must not have read the statement of the UN special envoy to resolve the conflict in Syria, Staffan de Mistura. This man identified the “moderate rebels” with the terrorists: the named “rebels” lead indiscriminate shelling of the western quarters in Aleppo, as well as the corridors along which civilians want to go. Mistura noted that such actions of the "rebels" should be considered as unequivocal war crimes.
Mr. Kirby along with his boss in this case should be classified as people covering war criminals.
By the way, the Syrian news agency SANA reports on the use by militants of terrorist groups, persistently called by the West "moderate opposition", chemical weapons. Militants fired shells with toxic substances quarter, which is the military academy of Aleppo. Mr Kirby did not notice.
Comments from our readers:
Giant thought
This is a real paranoid schizophrenic, which is incurable. There is only one way out - smear your forehead with greens so that there is no infection when you get a bullet.
1536
Yes, sorry for him to spend a bullet! Straitjacket, Charcot's shower, wheels of insanity, to the area under Salekhard, when they are cured. Here's what to do with it. And after ...
Mountain shooter
And what is there to argue? This is an artist, and "he sees it." They all "see it that way." Because democracy, in their deep conviction, is not the power of the people. This is the power of the American people!
Banishing liberoids
Here you have the lack aviation, and negotiations with the militants - they not only regrouped, but also replenished the arsenal and went on the attack again.
Obama in a puddle
The Russian Ministry of Defense has notified the Pentagon that attempts by the US Air Force to bomb targets in Syria without permission from the Kremlin will receive a forceful response, they write in the West. Foreign analysts conclude: Putin has achieved strategic goals in Syria. He saved the Assad regime, and the Americans managed to portray the villains who support the terrorists. Obama with his policy sat in a puddle.
John Schindler in Observer, in fact, recognized Putin as the winner in Syria. The author drew a parallel between the situation in Syria and historical situation in the former Yugoslavia. Both confrontations in ethnically and religiously diverse states "were unnatural." Yugoslavia actually broke up exactly 20 years before Syria began to boil, but the conflicts that led to the disaster of the two states now seem similar: a cruel mishmash of opposing groups, religious and ethnic extremism, contempt for civilians. There is a difference: Russia helping Assad can change the outcome of the conflict in Syria.
True, the author of the material in the Observer does not consider that Putin and his ministers are “strategic geniuses”. Not at all. Putin and his ministers "acted cynically and cunningly in Syria," but the White House, which failed, gave the opportunity to them, whose owner demonstrated "stunning, unprecedented foreign policy incompetence." Again and again, Obama and his entourage made mistakes and eventually turned foreign policy into some kind of amateur activity. These losers were again and again conquered by Russians who looked at American politicians "with undisguised contempt."
Comments from our readers:
egor-kz
If you omit the emotional component, whether in the article, in yourself after reading, then I come to only one conclusion, backing up all the results for today: Syria is our tactical victory undoubtedly. I think that it’s not entirely correct to talk about strategic victory in modern politics in general, and in the Middle East in particular. In my opinion, it is obvious that our leadership (in the person it is clear whom), most likely has a strategic goal (no one will say that to us), but moves towards this goal with tactical segments. Accurate and accurate. God forbid ...
Ustrushan
Russia's victory in Syria will be when there is a stable environment. As the last attack of barmaglots under Aleppo shows, they still have strength, and the sponsors have coins. Victory is still far away.
uskrabut
The operation in Syria is a real necessity, we would have delayed a little bit more, and we would have been squeezed out of the European gas market. It’s not just that the European Union put sticks into the South Stream project, everything was done with the knowledge and at the direction of the United States and in their interests. And the interest is to replace Russian gas in Europe with Qatari and have a good income from it. Nothing personal, only business is Yankee’s favorite saying.
Sarah, we are not alone
The Israeli publication mako.co.il publishes material in which it argues that "there is a growing likelihood of conflict" between Israel and Russia. The newspaper writes that the strengthening of Russia's military presence in the region is worrying the Israeli military, since "for the first time in 40 years, the Israeli Air Force and Navy in the region are not alone and do not have full control."
The publication refers to some representatives of the armed forces of the country, who "in private conversations" declare their surprise about the quantity and quality of Russian weapons and military equipment operating "near the borders of Israel." The portal reports that the Israeli army is actually accustomed to complete freedom of action in the region: on land, at sea and in the air. Now, for example, the Israeli military pilots are forced to act with an eye to the fact that Russia has the latest air defense systems in Syria.
According to the author of the article in the Israeli media, “the clash between Israel and Russia” is only a matter of time.
Two or three more such articles, and the rumor will reach the “international media”, where it will be corrected and edited so that the globe will become clear: Muscovites, dug “near the borders of Israel”, are threatened with “complete control” of Tel Aviv. Further, of course, followed by the annexation of Israel and its accession to the Jewish Autonomous Region.
Comments from our readers:
Kasym
Israel, I see only one benefit. Syria is now a zone of responsibility of Russia. White House damn it, that there will be on the border, if the bearded will die Damascus. Everything shows that Bibi does not particularly trust the US authorities. And then such a player in the face of the Russian Federation - if anything, there is much to complain about and find justice for the same Hezbollah, for example. So some advantages for Israel. Well, you can fly in the direction of the sea, even under the air defense eye and under the "record".
Ingvar 72
No, nothing will happen. There are no real prerequisites. Another media stuffing of the waste products of the body to the fan.
Maki Avellevich
I hope you are right. Unfortunately, in history there have been precedents for wars without obvious real prerequisites and an understandable rational. Human motivation is sometimes hidden from our minds.
Temples
Will Israel fight Russia?
This is crazy nonsense, or a way to make money.
Balts, Poles, Georgians, Bulgarians and others. These slogans live and get paid for this verbal diarrhea.
So some group of Jews decided to pay for Russophobia.
Every family has its black sheep.
This is crazy nonsense, or a way to make money.
Balts, Poles, Georgians, Bulgarians and others. These slogans live and get paid for this verbal diarrhea.
So some group of Jews decided to pay for Russophobia.
Every family has its black sheep.
Sorry, but you are to blame
On Saturday last week, the story of how an American aircraft type AWACS (aviation detection and guidance complex), coming out of its train in the sky of Syria, approached about half a kilometer (according to other information, about half a mile) to the Russian fighter Su -35. Perhaps, for the first time in recent years, the American side decided to apologize for breaking the flight regime (leaving the train). Given the deepest American confidence in their own infallibility and planetary exclusivity, it draws on a sensation. However, realizing that they themselves create a precedent, the Americans immediately decided to play back.
A representative of the so-called American coalition operating in Syria, said that the guilty party “should be considered a Russian pilot,” but the Americans decided to “have mercy” on the “unlucky Russian pilot” and declared that his actions were not premeditated ...
Well, we are waiting for the third statement from the Americans: that the Russian pilot showed a “low level of professionalism,” or even real “unprofessionalism,” violated the rules of peaceful life in the sky and generally planned to circle Syria, and then sharply turn, fly to Washington and shoot the White House, where the main peacemaker of the planet lives in the last weeks.
Comments from our readers:
dmi.pris
Of course, no one there changed diapers at an early pace - neither on the “Cook” nor on airplanes, all the more. Surprise - yes, caused. Quite rightly: they lost their scent, they got used to the fact that everyone gives up their place. This is the reason for these incidents.
Tatar 174
It’s not far from here before the present incident with the use of weapons, if they don’t stop considering us to be eternally undermined by Russians with an economy torn to shreds, rusty to holes, incomprehensible like flying airplanes and smoking like an engine, aircraft carriers ... The faster we put them in place, the safer it will be in the world.
Altona
Radiofrequency and thermal "portrait" was done for the Su-35, and then "apologized." In general, they have done their work, and the people in the forums have a ... who is better.
Hybrid warfare in the canteen
The publication of The Telegraph colorfully tells about the incident that occurred with representatives of the British military contingent in Latvia. A couple of royal warriors who ate hamburgers in the McDonalds canteen were attacked suddenly. Bottom line: beatings and injuries. Who inflicted? There is a version! British journalists argue that the attack was carried out in the framework of the “hybrid war of Russia against Western countries, in particular, Britain.”
Moreover, the British media claims that those who attacked the valiant soldiers of Her Majesty with their fists, then "disappeared into the office of the media, known for its pro-Russian views." The fight in the catering establishment is very agile and mobile people managed to shoot a video camera. True, the name of the media with "pro-Russian views" is not mentioned. And the address is not specified.
The NATO soldier biomass, which for some time has settled in Latvia, behaves ugly in the republic, for which, it must be supposed, it gets into the snout. NATO members urinate on the flower beds, on the statues, arrange dances on the roof of a taxi and take off their pants in front of the cafe windows. NATO members, we note, not Russian.
Comments from our readers:
Major Yurik
If both saxes from one blow flew out to the shop window, and the shoes stayed at the place of the meal, then our beats beat, from the heart, with all the hybridity!
Monos
In my opinion, they confuse the hybrid war with the guerrilla.
AlexTires
An eyewitness said that he had seen one of the guys, before entering McDonald's, put on an earflap with an asterisk, saluted the elder and said: “I promise to hit half-and-half, comrade captain!”
Good commission
On Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal, having managed to get ahead of its European colleagues, published a report that the European Commission had allowed the Russian concern Gazprom to increase the load on the OPAL gas pipeline. News This somehow did not become a sensation. European media sluggishly duplicated it, but refrained from commenting.
To be precise, the European Commission allowed the Russian concern to use OPAL on 90% of its capacity. I would allow everything to 100, but for the time being the European officials are “holding their face,” notes G. Granovsky.
The reason is simple: in recent years, when the Cold War was revived, the OPAL gas pipeline was for Europeans not only an infrastructure object, but also a means of deterring Gazprom’s export plans. After all, the attacks on Gazprom are one of the best ways to pressure Russia, highly dependent on the supply of raw materials abroad.
With the Russian gas pipeline helped ... Ukraine. The European Commission did not play political games with the people of Kiev who are not in a hurry to fill gas storages with Russian gas and are demanding money from the EU, and as much as possible opened the gas valve for Gazprom’s access to the countries where hydrocarbon supplies were threatened by Ukraine. The bargaining of the gas company turned out to be inappropriate for the EU, as it was supposed. There wasn’t enough Brussels to depend on Kiev’s position!
The political and economic outcome is clear: the European Commission, by its decision, has made it clear who Europe can really count on and who is a reliable partner for it.
Comments from our readers:
Finches
In the pragmatic West, they are well aware that politics is politics, but if problems with heating start due to negligent Ukraine, the electorate raises out of these comfortable Brussels leather chairs all these Tusk, Shultsev, and the heads of state will get it!
Masya masya
Frost and sun; a wonderful day!
nik1321
If the greed of "Gazprom" did not overshadow the mind, long ago many problems would have been solved. We need to start by avoiding responsibility for pumping gas through the territory of Ukraine. And in general, do not assume obligations, the fulfillment of which is not within the competence of Gazprom. Then, after a year or two, the EU itself will build a new gas pipeline bypassing Ukraine. In general, this gas has more problems than good. No one guaranteed that the EU would not introduce any 5 or 6 energy package, which would bring down all the agreements. Or what kind of sanctions without a reason, and everything will again go on a new one. Today OPAL was opened on 90%, tomorrow they will be closed ... As soon as the gas from Azerbaijan (TANAP) comes to Turkey (possibly 2017), then they will pull threads in the EU, who will prevent them from twisting the arms of Gazprom for any contrived reason?
rasteer
That's why it's time to finish trading resources. There are plenty of such diggers without us.
Counterintelligence went public
Russia poses a growing threat to the stability of Britain and uses all the modern means at its disposal to achieve its goals, said Andrew Parker, director general of the British Security Service, to The Guardian.
By the way, this man became the first general director among all the chiefs of MI5, who agreed to give interviews to journalists. This was not the 107 years of service!
According to MI5, Moscow uses a variety of means and methods to “promote its foreign policy” in foreign countries. Russian spying, sabotage, cyber attacks and propaganda. So it happens "throughout Europe and the UK."
Earlier, Mr. Parker stated that his agency has reasons to make part of MI5’s activities public: “We must find an approach to people, develop public relations and involve citizens in the service as agents, to work for us.”
Obviously, we add, the head of the British counterintelligence service found a convenient excuse both for expanding the activities and staff of his service, and for making excuses before an incorruptible court and a tumultuous British civil society, and at the same time to some extent even before Snowden, whose documents are in 2013. It was published in The Gurdian (the newspaper did not fear the wrath of the Prime Minister himself). The reason is the “Russian threat”, which no one thought about in 2013.
The strange thing is that the head of MI5 was revealed to the press only at the end of 2016. And such a headache is headed by a powerful intelligence service, who dreams of defeating the Russians?
It is not surprising that this man did not name in an interview any Russian spy-saboteur caught in the last three years, sent to London by comrade Putin.
Comments from our readers:
hirurg
Something happened to the mass consciousness in Europe. Even the most important counterintelligence officer of Her Majesty began to carry complete nonsense.
Although he wasn’t supposed to open his mouth at all, which was just 107 gods.
But what happened: confusion and vacillation. And if it is possible for someone to blather and withdraw a bonus, so why can't we?
LLC "Mi-5". Something like this.
Old Europe is close to chaos.
Although he wasn’t supposed to open his mouth at all, which was just 107 gods.
But what happened: confusion and vacillation. And if it is possible for someone to blather and withdraw a bonus, so why can't we?
LLC "Mi-5". Something like this.
Old Europe is close to chaos.
sl22277
The name of the western enemy was and remains one - the Englishman. The enemy is cruel and savage, unprincipled and inhuman, insidious and ruthless, arrogant and treacherous. An enemy who, not once for the sake of his own profit, entered into an alliance with Russia and each time sold and betrayed her. General A. E. Vandam (Aleksey Efimovich Yedrikhin) said: "It is bad to have an Anglo-Saxon enemy, but it is even worse to have him as a friend."
Skeptic Self-Taught
Interestingly the girls are dancing ...
So, when everyone, who is not lazy, collapsed Russia, sponsored terrorism in the Caucasus, organized sabotage in industry and manufacturing, oh ... they fucked up our history - was everything good? And when otvetki began to arrive, we immediately try to hide behind the "laws"?
The next yelling and calls for "humanitarian bombardment" and the preparation of the population for ... but what is the topic of a separate conversation.
So, when everyone, who is not lazy, collapsed Russia, sponsored terrorism in the Caucasus, organized sabotage in industry and manufacturing, oh ... they fucked up our history - was everything good? And when otvetki began to arrive, we immediately try to hide behind the "laws"?
The next yelling and calls for "humanitarian bombardment" and the preparation of the population for ... but what is the topic of a separate conversation.
Commonwealth №4
Lawmakers in Kiev and Warsaw recently adopted a joint resolution “On the Declaration of Memory and Solidarity of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine”. Announcing this event, the politicians of the two countries talked about a trilateral political action, to which the deputies of the Lithuanian Seimas should join. On this occasion, the chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Andrey Paruby, even made a special statement. He noted that the Seimas International Affairs Committee had already supported the text of the declaration. Ukrainian deputies nodded to Parubiy approvingly, paying little attention to the fact that the election campaign was over in Lithuania, and a different composition of the deputies of the Lithuanian parliament should give an assessment of the joint declaration, observer G. Granovsky notes.
The Seimas deputies did not accidentally mention the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in their resolution. In fact, the tragic events of 1943 took place in the occupied territory of Soviet Ukraine. As you know, Volyn only until 1939, was part of Poland. During the war, fascist henchmen hosted here - Ukrainian nationalists.
Poland persistently promotes its idea to return the lands lost before the war and form the fourth Rzeczpospolita. The provisions on the illegality of the rejection of its eastern territories and the "crime" of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact have already been entrenched in the PACE and European Parliament documents. Now they are migrating to bilateral agreements with their neighbors.
The politicians of old Europe refer to the eastern plans of Poland with a certain degree of condescension and call them not “strategy”, but “improvisation”.
Comments from our readers:
Locomotive
It would be great if the Poles really, at the level of their Foreign Ministry, would have made territorial claims to Ukraine.
But this, unfortunately, will not. Big Brother will not allow them, because it is unprofitable.
But this, unfortunately, will not. Big Brother will not allow them, because it is unprofitable.
Nyrobsky
Yes, there is not so much the "Big Brother" will not allow, as the EU, because the territorial claims in this time followed by Germany to Poland, too. So no one will directly take away any land.
It can be assumed that this topic will initially acquire the implementation in the form of creating nat. autonomy on the territory of Ukraine, in which the interests of Hungary, Romania, Poland involved will be consolidated, well, and in the future it is likely that the issue will be resolved through a referendum in these autonomies on voluntary adherence to designated countries. So to say, through the will of the people !!!
It seems that soon the topic of non-recognition by Europe of the Crimean referendum will be resolved in favor of its recognition, in order to use this precedent in resolving territorial claims with Ukraine, but already with Poland, Hungary and Romania.
So the division of Ukraine, it seems, can not be avoided.
It can be assumed that this topic will initially acquire the implementation in the form of creating nat. autonomy on the territory of Ukraine, in which the interests of Hungary, Romania, Poland involved will be consolidated, well, and in the future it is likely that the issue will be resolved through a referendum in these autonomies on voluntary adherence to designated countries. So to say, through the will of the people !!!
It seems that soon the topic of non-recognition by Europe of the Crimean referendum will be resolved in favor of its recognition, in order to use this precedent in resolving territorial claims with Ukraine, but already with Poland, Hungary and Romania.
So the division of Ukraine, it seems, can not be avoided.
pts-m
These two "friendly nations" can fight with each other and then at a single table to drink halb-letter schnapps and make friends with a new one, and there’s no need for us to get confused under our feet.
The quantity is, the matter of quality?
“Recently, in various media outlets in the West and in Russia, more and more often there is an interesting topic from the point of view of exactly what I wrote above. Theme forced peace of Ukraine. Donbass nothing to fear. APU and punishers have nothing and nothing to shoot. They buried the Ukrainian Armed Forces before the deadline, ”write military experts A. Staver and R. Skomorokhov.
In fact, although they write about the absence of soldiers for the ATO (about the lack of personnel in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and law enforcement agencies), the influx takes place: “And for a compulsory conscription, and, oddly enough, they go completely to themselves voluntarily. And not disabled people go at all, but quite healthy young guys. Those who worked in the factories the day before yesterday, but today are simply out of work. Not everyone has the opportunity to trade in the market, and the purchasing power in Ukraine today is not the same. And the army is a place where a person will be guaranteed to be provided with everything (or almost everything) necessary. By the way, about the same situation in LDNR. Even worse. ”
Therefore, in today's Ukraine there is someone to serve. How to serve is another quality issue. As for the quantity, Kiev has enough ammunition as well as soldiers.
Comments from our readers:
Ustrushan
Ammunition is easy to find with proper funding (Eastern Europe is close by and close), the intensity of the battles is low compared to the real war. Strangely enough, more or less normal guys are fighting on the side of the Ukrainian army. I talked with some, they say "here (at the front) everything is fair, open and honest relations between the guys, and in the civilian community there are problems: finding a normal job, everyday problems and so on." So many do not want to leave and demobilize in order to plunge into "normal life."
If there are funding problems with ammunition, weapons and people will not be problems.
If there are funding problems with ammunition, weapons and people will not be problems.
Homo
"Normal guys" - in the civilian world there is nowhere to earn, I will go to kill my own (for money)! Is this, in your opinion, "normal guys" ??? And Bandera they have an example to follow!
Retvizan
Fighting mainly from the center and south. Such Russian Ukrainians quite well (if you can put it that way), those who always fought well in any war of the RI / USSR. Those who could need Russia, but not needed. Bandera they are not a hero. But the oath - these people are quite self disciplined, because their environment is urban ...
Do not confuse the concept of the oath and the country with the ideals of the nationalists (who are fighting very badly, and even framed the APU). The army of Ukraine is heterogeneous in its ideas, but for the most part it is the defense of the country. That it is promoted by the media. And Bandera doesn’t like the Southerners and is not at all central. He is a stranger.
Do not confuse the concept of the oath and the country with the ideals of the nationalists (who are fighting very badly, and even framed the APU). The army of Ukraine is heterogeneous in its ideas, but for the most part it is the defense of the country. That it is promoted by the media. And Bandera doesn’t like the Southerners and is not at all central. He is a stranger.
The people and the party are one
On October 31, during the meeting of the Council on Interethnic Relations in Astrakhan, Vladimir Putin supported the idea of the need to “work on the adoption” of the law on the unity of the Russian nation. Vladimir Putin is quoted as saying by TASS: “What exactly is absolutely possible and necessary to implement, right above this, you need to think about it and in practical terms, start working - this is the law on the Russian nation. Good offer".
Some time ago, Vyacheslav Mikhailov, head of the department of national and federative relations of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service, voiced a proposal to state men to consider the adoption of the law “On the Russian Nation and the Management of Inter-Ethnic Relations”. The name of a possible future law also belongs to Vyacheslav Mikhailov, who at one time served as Minister for Nationalities Affairs, and who today advocates changing the Constitution in terms of introducing into it the concept of the same “Russian nation”.
According to Mikhailov, the state must determine the ideological line in order to continue development. At the same time, Mikhailov believes that the idea should be as fundamental as the idea of building communism. If in a nutshell, the Russian nation is offered not to “pull down from above” in the form of a “pointer”, but rather to build: the citizen of the Russian Federation should be conscious that he is primarily a citizen of Russia with his nationality.
You would think the idea of communism was not lowered from above! Remember the slogan: "Things and thoughts of Ilyich will survive the centuries"? Centuries really survived the affairs and thoughts of Lenin. Yes, there is a century, a few decades is enough.
No foundation, especially Marxist, in the construction of "communism" and did not smell. To build, and without a foundation, it was possible only that state capitalism, which Grandfather Lenin preached. Very unstable structure came out.
And here is a much more complicated question - the nation. It cannot be defined by any law there. There was a law - got the nation. It's as funny as waiting for communism for the 1980 year or a separate apartment for the 2000 year.
And how should one speak to a Russian person about oneself? "I am Russian Russian"? Or "I am Russian Russian"?
Mikhailov's “good offer” is nothing more than an attempt to replace the historically dead definition of “Soviet” with the definition of “Russian”. The imperial vision of the future of Russia is obvious here. With the difference that the word "Soviet" came for history, and did not run ahead of it. Moreover, the ideologists of the law of unity hardly have any idea about the replacement of communism. Perhaps instead of communism we substitute oligarchic capitalism and corruption?
Although, of course, the law must be taken. In the end, we already have a “united” party, and the people cannot be left behind from the party in terms of unity.
Comments from our readers:
siberalt
Oh well. What about the law of love for the motherland? A nation must be united by ideology, not by law. For any law is already coercion.
Tatar 174
It looks like a search for a national idea, which was talked about a lot, but now it's silent, and not finding it. It seems to me that both the national idea and the formation of the Russian nation will come themselves when the people in Russia live much easier than they do now, when everyone has a normal job and salary, when everyone is really equal before the law, when there are no strongly highlights and sticks out its more equal degree in society compared to others, when inflation becomes imperceptible, when health care becomes decent and affordable, and not formal, as it is now. Well, a lot of things in the same spirit. And it all boils down to raising the country's economy and respecting the laws by all without exception.
kit_bellew
You listen, as in the times of Ivan the Terrible or, say, Nikolai Pavlovich, the people in Russia either lived much easier than they do now, or there was no national idea at all. Nevertheless, she was and expressed through faith. I myself am an atheist, but this has nothing to do with this historical fact. Before the revolution, the Russian superethnos, in the language of L. N. Gumilyov, identified itself through Orthodoxy, through its moral and ethical attitudes. After the revolution, Christ was replaced by a moral code of the builder of communism. The replacement, it must be said, is purely formal: the essence of the installations has not changed a single gram. This is the essence that was lost in 1991. It is necessary to return to her. But I am afraid that it will be incredibly difficult to do this, if not impossible at all. Who now will support the rejection of the personal for the community? Waiver of the right to "privacy", as they now call elementary bliss, for the sake of raising a decent young generation? If there are any, honor and praise to them.
Chechnya is on its feet
The proposal of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation on the budget of Chechnya for the next year, suggesting a reduction in expenses, is unacceptable for the republic, RIA Novosti reports Ramzan Kadyrov’s statement.
The head of the republic noted that Chechnya is “only now on its feet,” but there are still a lot of problems. “Chechnya is among the two only regions where there are three shifts in schools. We restored the facilities, but after that the most difficult part begins - to purchase equipment, to train specialists. We need to develop the main directions of the economy, ”he said at the budget meeting.
Commenting on Kadyrov’s statement and the budget theme, the press secretary of the Russian president, Dmitry Peskov, used the expression “substance”.
"This is a topic of argumentation, this question is not simply related to the interest of one subject of the Russian Federation, it is a question of the country's general budget, a rather complicated substance, where all aspects should be taken into account, which, in fact, will occur in the State Duma," the press secretary quotes Interfax.
Comments from our readers:
tsvetkov1274
There is no money, but you hold on, all the best.
Vend
Budget cuts are bad for any region. Because the regions are accustomed to living on financial distributions from the center. Must be able to earn. In every region there is something to develop and where to make a profit. It’s just that the managers should not be politicians-administrators, but competent business executives. And the swamp, which now controls the regions, should be put in more stringent conditions.
IrbisRus
And it was not necessary to sell state property indiscriminately. Would leave all the administrative buildings and warehouses, which were owned by the state, and would live by renting a cloak without the outflow of capital in the center. But racherachili, sold, stole. Well, now with an outstretched hand to Moscow and on the knees, only on the knees, otherwise it is impossible.
Gur
And where is the money from Moscow, from the Mausoleum? Or from the regions?
In general, it is necessary to stop the situation. Take the civil servants. A person with the same position, duties, if he lives in Moscow and the region, then the difference in salaries is several times. As a result, everyone rushes to the capital, and Muscovites as residents of another planet. Or am I wrong?
In general, it is necessary to stop the situation. Take the civil servants. A person with the same position, duties, if he lives in Moscow and the region, then the difference in salaries is several times. As a result, everyone rushes to the capital, and Muscovites as residents of another planet. Or am I wrong?
230 million and censorship
This week was made a sensational statement by K. A. Raikin about the “censorship” in Russia: “... I am very worried - I think, like you all - those phenomena that occur in our life. These, so to speak, assaults on art, on theater, in particular. These are completely lawless, extremist, arrogant, aggressive, hiding behind the words about morality, about morality, and in general with all sorts of, so to speak, good and lofty words: “patriotism”, “Motherland” and “high morality”.
Why not even submit to censorship? Whose money?
According to media reports, in 2016, the Satirikon Theater, headed by Konstantin Arkadyevich, received more than 230 million rubles from the budget! It means that Konstantin Arkadyevich needs to keep his mouth shut. And do what they say.
As economists say, the market is simple but tough. Put performances without budget funding. Based on market self-sufficiency and profitability. Will this theater, consuming such sums, remain afloat? Clearly not. Is censorship really to blame?
Comments from our readers:
Jarilo
In my opinion, something like censorship is necessary. In the Theater of the Young Spectator there was a production in which they spat in the direction of the hall, shot, imitated intercourse, mate and other abuse. Here the censors will be just angels. You can call them moderators.
siberalt
What is bad life in the capital court theaters? Rental of premises, their maintenance and repair, all utilities, the salaries of actors and scenery at public expense. That is, at the expense of taxpayers. Satirikon also earns about 250 millions a year for the seb. Here, if anything, a medal, the title of "national", then to Medina. How so? His role is more expensive to sell the same state, for example, in the movie. As they say, the one who pays is the one who orders the music. But the point is not that there is no state censorship, but the fact that every “bydlo” (it’s also a taxpayer) tries to criticize their “artists” who teach us how to live. It turns out that troubadours and buffoons are introducing their ideology into the masses. And in order for these masses to carry to them, not the poor, money, and, moreover, love them, you need to give more chernukha from the stage. No ... we want you to give out a clean and highly moral product, and not a slurry of your orientation towards the fun of mink coats.
Alex_1973
Well, it seems to me that here it’s not so much self-promotion as banal extortion of the dough and the requirement to leave the “artist” alone. Something like: give money and do not meddle in the "soul to the artist, he sees it."
In general, once again I am convinced of the corruption of our so-called "intelligentsia". After all, you see what names are: Makarevich, Akhedzhakova, Basilashvili, Rogovtseva, Rotaru, Kikabidze, Raikin, Efremov, etc. Notice, all the fry-ups of the "scoop" they hate, so here's the paradox. In this very "scoop" with "cruellest" censorship and total "bloody gebn" these figures (let's call them that) made great films that, unlike modern ones, I want and I want to watch, composed songs that the whole country listened to. Why were masterpieces created in the “bloody totalitarian scoop”, and now one shit, wrapped in a wrapper “the artist sees it so”? And how much is he "an artist"? And who inspired him in general that he was an “artist,” and even “ingenious”? When I see our so-called "bohemia", "elite", discussing another masterpiece a la Kandinsky, Malevich and others like them, or as a degenerate drug addict who imagines himself an artist, nails his genitals to the next fence, he begins to feel sick. I immediately recall the fairy tale "The Naked King". This is the most accurate description of the orgy that is going on in them. This disgusting, bydlyatsky in all respects, community of "artists" who consider themselves intellectuals, and you yourself know the people by whom, it's time to destroy or escort out of the country. No wonder that during the troubles and revolutions, the people first of all dealt with just such figures. Already got "artists".
Yesterday Medinovsky was looking at Solovyov, he also gave ... money, I don’t interfere in censorship ... especially after the incident with the Mannerheim board.
No, gentlemen, "artists", either live on their own personal account, or the state gives money, but at the same time introduces strict censorship! Otherwise we will destroy ourselves, with such a "culture"!
In general, once again I am convinced of the corruption of our so-called "intelligentsia". After all, you see what names are: Makarevich, Akhedzhakova, Basilashvili, Rogovtseva, Rotaru, Kikabidze, Raikin, Efremov, etc. Notice, all the fry-ups of the "scoop" they hate, so here's the paradox. In this very "scoop" with "cruellest" censorship and total "bloody gebn" these figures (let's call them that) made great films that, unlike modern ones, I want and I want to watch, composed songs that the whole country listened to. Why were masterpieces created in the “bloody totalitarian scoop”, and now one shit, wrapped in a wrapper “the artist sees it so”? And how much is he "an artist"? And who inspired him in general that he was an “artist,” and even “ingenious”? When I see our so-called "bohemia", "elite", discussing another masterpiece a la Kandinsky, Malevich and others like them, or as a degenerate drug addict who imagines himself an artist, nails his genitals to the next fence, he begins to feel sick. I immediately recall the fairy tale "The Naked King". This is the most accurate description of the orgy that is going on in them. This disgusting, bydlyatsky in all respects, community of "artists" who consider themselves intellectuals, and you yourself know the people by whom, it's time to destroy or escort out of the country. No wonder that during the troubles and revolutions, the people first of all dealt with just such figures. Already got "artists".
Yesterday Medinovsky was looking at Solovyov, he also gave ... money, I don’t interfere in censorship ... especially after the incident with the Mannerheim board.
No, gentlemen, "artists", either live on their own personal account, or the state gives money, but at the same time introduces strict censorship! Otherwise we will destroy ourselves, with such a "culture"!
Era robots-killers
Whoever wins the presidential election in the United States, he will have to despise diplomacy and start a war with Russia. Journalists and analysts hint at this in their materials, believing that after the elections, Washington will advance with “aggressive politics”. What war will begin? Nuclear? No, military experts are predicting an era of killer robots. Thousands of quadcopters with on board explosives will fly into the air. In such a reality, humanity will be in two years.
Obviously, Western analysts, military and computer science professors have decided on the unenviable future that awaits the unfortunate planet.
Since diplomacy in the United States turned into a formal institution, needed only to call for peace after the war, it is Washington’s “aggressive policy” that will become the prologue to the start of the third world war in which the United States, Russia and China can clash.
In view of the fact that no one wants to start a nuclear war, and also because the technologies drones are rapidly developing and improving, a new war will be fought with the help of flocks of quadrocopters and similar means that recognize and destroy people, tanks and even ships "automatically", that is, without human intervention.
American commanders without fear and reproach of conscience will send such flocks to the attack: there is no risk to people's lives.
Comments from our readers:
Mountain shooter
This is the prospect of a not too near future (meaning the army of killer drones). Independently, these "birds" YET cannot act, intelligence at the level of ants, however, it is not difficult to deal with them yet.
Skeptic Self-Taught
Fighting quadrocopters ... Then, I suppose that they will all fall in Siberia ...
your1970
What kind of Siberia, to God, you imagine yourself flight performance characteristics from the 3-, 4-see the drone! Where in range can it fly? If NORMAL airplanes and helicopters are FORCED to refuel even when flying in the European part of Russia! Strategic are forced to refuel in flights over the Russian Federation ...
Or will they first win the RF, and then start sending drones?
Or will they first win the RF, and then start sending drones?
Alex_1973
I am also wondering what can a drone in centimeters 3-4? His elementary will blow the wind. Yes, and where he can fly, at what distance? In general, about flocks of mini-drones - this is some kind of nonsense, at least at the modern level.
cap
A cowboy’s offer to fence with a sword when he has a colt on his side - didn’t anything more funny come up with?
Where are those three people who are going to control the drones, and how are they going to control them?
Above Donald Cook. if you remember, 12 once flew our plane with a jammer, while the operators of this "miracle of American technology" fought for a place in the latrine (toilet on the ship, in an army style "push"). And where did they go after that?
Right! We wrote a report on the dismissal.
Something like that.
You can tickle a bear in a den, of course, (by drone or drone), but only theoretically. The bear has a very good nose.
Where are those three people who are going to control the drones, and how are they going to control them?
Above Donald Cook. if you remember, 12 once flew our plane with a jammer, while the operators of this "miracle of American technology" fought for a place in the latrine (toilet on the ship, in an army style "push"). And where did they go after that?
Right! We wrote a report on the dismissal.
Something like that.
You can tickle a bear in a den, of course, (by drone or drone), but only theoretically. The bear has a very good nose.
* "To whom the prologue, and to whom and the epilogue." - a phrase from the movie “Days of the Turbins”
Information