Rat, which has nowhere to fight

41
The United States is one of the few countries in the Armed Forces of which the ground forces are not the dominant type, either in terms of number, number of weapons and equipment, nor in contribution to military operations, nor in terms of influence. For the Americans, the fleet has always been the most important type of armed forces, then aviation.

But even despite the current "fatigue from wars" and the Pentagon budget cuts, the US Army retains enormous potential.



Their organization is very complex due to the number and spatial scope. There are headquarters field armies (PA), which, as a rule, duplicate the territorial command and must replace them in case of war. On the territory of the USA there are corps - army (AK) and airborne (VDK). But the main type of formations are divisions, each of which currently includes two or three line brigades and an army aviation brigade. The first are divided into heavy (armored), light (infantry, airborne) and Stryker (they can be considered average), equipped with the same combat vehicles.

The Ground Forces Command (headquarters in Fort Bragg, North Carolina) has one PA, two AKs, one VDK, two training centers, 32-e Air Defense Command and Reserve Command.

3-st AK (Fort Hood, Texas) includes most of the heavy compounds. The 1 Armored Division (Fort Bliss, Texas) has the Stryker 1, 2 and 3 heavy (armored), 212 artillery and army aviation brigades. 1 Cavalry (Armored) Division (Fort Hood): 1, 2, 3-I armored, 41-I artillery and army aviation brigades. 1-I Infantry Division (Fort-Riley, Kansas): 1, 2-I armored and army aviation brigade. 4 Infantry Division (Fort-Carson, Colorado): Stryker 1, Infantry 2, 3 Armored and Army Aviation Brigade. In addition, the 3-th AK has a number of corps subordination structures. These are the 3 Cavalry Regiment (equivalent to the Stryker Brigade), 75-I Artillery, 36-I Engineering, 89-I Military Police, 504-I Intelligence, 1, 4, 15, 43-I support brigade.

The 18 VDC (Fort Bragg) includes most of the mobile connections. The 3 Infantry Division (Fort Stewart, GA) has the 1 Armored, 2 Infantry, 3 Army Brigade. 10-I Light Infantry (Mountain) Division (Fort Drum, New York): 1, 2, 3-I infantry and army aviation brigades. 82 Airborne Division (Fort Bragg): 1, 2, 3-I and Army Aviation Brigade. 101-I Airborne Division (Fort Campbell, Kentucky): 1, 2, 3-i brigade, 101, 159-i brigade of army aviation. In addition, the 18-th VDK has a number of corps subordination structures. These are 20-th command of the RHBZ, 16-I military police, 18-I artillery, 20-I engineering, 525-I reconnaissance brigade, 108-I air defense (simultaneously subordinate to the above-mentioned 32 th air defense command), 44-I medical, XNX transport, 7 communication, 35, 3, 10, 82 communication brigade.

1-th AK (Fort Lewis-McCord, Washington) - a pool of reserve-training nature. The 7 Infantry Division (Fort Lewis) is not considered a combat unit, its headquarters is responsible only for combat training and logistical support of the attached units. These are the 1 and the Stryker 2 Brigade of the 2 Infantry Division, the 16-I Army Aviation, the 17-I Artillery, the 555-I Engineering and the 201-I reconnaissance brigades. In addition, as part of the 1-th AK there are 42-I military police and 62-I medical brigade as part of the 593-th security command.

The 1-I PA (Rock Island, Illinois) includes two training divisions. Vostok (Fort Knox, Kentucky) has 157, 158, 174, 188, 205 th infantry, 177 th armored, 4 th artillery brigades. Division West (Fort Hood, Texas): 72, 120, 181 and 189-I infantry, 191-I artillery, 402-I armored brigades. The ground forces reserve command (Fort Bragg) is primarily responsible for the logistics of the ground forces. It includes brigades: medical 5, aviation, support 10, engineering 9, military police 2.

In addition, the Ground Forces Command has two training centers - Fort Irwin and joint training. The 11 armored cavalry regiment (equivalent to the armored brigade), which serves as a conditional enemy for other units and formations, is deployed in Fort Irvine.

The highest-level commanders in the United States are also training (Fort-Eustis, Virginia) and MTO (Redstone, Alabama), their purpose is clear from the names, there are no combat units in the structure.

Rat, which has nowhere to fightThe combat units stationed in the United States, not subordinate to the command of the ground forces, are part of the commands of the SSO, cybernetic and space.

The MTR command (Fort Bragg) has 7 MTR groups (1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 19, 20, the last two - in the National Guard), the 1 group of the MTR (Delta group, antiterrorist group) division), 75-th Ranger Regiment, 160-th Air Regiment MTR, 4 and 8-group of psychological operations, 95-th work with the civilian population and 528-th brigade training center, MTR training center.

The cyber command (Fort Belvoir, Virginia) includes the 1-I command information operations and the 780-I military intelligence brigade.

Space Command (Redstone, Alabama) has 1-th space (Peterson, Colorado) and 100-ABM brigade (Shriver, Colorado) as part of.

Ground forces outside the United States and in the two enclave states (Alaska and Hawaii) are part of two territorial commands and one PA.

The European command and the duplicating 7-I PA (Wiesbaden, Germany) have the 2 Cavalry Regiment - equivalent to the Stryker Brigade (Wilsek, Germany), the 173-th Airborne Brigade (Vicenza, Italy), the American Brigade of NATO (Zembach, Germany), 12 Brigade of Army Aviation (Ansbach, Germany), 10-th command of air defense (Kaiserslautern, Germany), 21-th command of the support (Kaiserslautern, includes 18 th engineering brigade, 16-th brigade of the guarantee, providing support, 18-th engineering brigade, providing 405-th engineering brigade, providing 409-th engineering brigade, providing 66-th engineering brigade, providing 2-th engineering brigade, providing 7-th engineering brigade, providing XNUMX-th engineering brigade, providing XNUMX-th engineering brigade, providing XNUMX-th Engineering Brigade XNUMX th brigade of military police, XNUMX and XNUMX th brigade of support), XNUMX th reconnaissance the team and XNUMX communications of the brigade, as well as the XNUMX-e joint multinational training command (Grafevor).

The Pacific Command (Fort Shefter, Hawaii) is responsible for the defense of the enclave states. The 25 Infantry Division (Scofield, Hawaii) has Stryker 1, 2 and 3 Infantry, 4 th Airborne, Army Aviation and 25 th Brigade. 1 and 4-I brigades are deployed in Alaska, 2, 3-I and aviation - in Hawaii. In addition, the Pacific Command is subject to the 94-i missile defense brigade (Fort-Shefter), the 8-i support command (Scofield, the 8-i brigade of the military police, the 10-i support group, the 130-i engineering brigade), the 311- e command communications (1-I and 516-I communication brigade), 196-I infantry and 500-I reconnaissance brigade.

8-I PA (Seoul) is not organizationally part of the Pacific Command, is responsible for the defense of the Republic of Korea. The 2 Infantry Division incorporates the 1 and the Stryker 2 Brigade (Fort Lewis, WA, as mentioned above, are administratively subordinate to the 7 AK Infantry Division), the Army Aviation Brigade (Camp Humphrey , Korea), 1-th artillery brigade (Camp Kosi, Korea), 210-th support brigade (Camp Carroll, Korea). The units of military subordination are the 2-i security command, 19-I air defense brigade, 35-I intelligence, 501-i communications, 1-I medical brigade.

The US Army has 4 territorial command, each of which is duplicated by the field army headquarters. These are Northern Command, 5-I PA (San Antonio, Texas, responsible for the defense of North America), Southern Command, 6-I PA (San Antonio, Texas, responsible for Latin America, except Mexico), Central Command, 3- I am PA (Shaw, South Carolina, responsible for the Middle East and Central Asia region), African Command, 9-I PA (Vicenza, Italy). In peacetime, all of them are purely headquarters structures that do not have parts in constant submission.

The National Guard is responsible for the defense of the territory of the United States, its units in peacetime are subject to state governors. In reality, since there is no one to defend the territory of the country, they are regularly involved in operations abroad. The National Guard ground forces include 8 infantry divisions, each of which is scattered in three to five adjacent states.

28-I infantry division (Pennsylvania, Ohio, Maryland): 2-I infantry, 55-I heavy, 56-I Stryker, 28-I army brigade.

29 Infantry Division (Virginia, MD, North Carolina, Florida): 30-I armored, 53 and 116-I infantry, 29-I army brigade.

34 Infantry Division (Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Idaho): 1-I armored, 2 and 32-I infantry, 116-I cavalry, 34-I army brigade.

35-I infantry division (Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, Georgia, Arkansas): 33, 39, 48-I infantry, 35-I army brigade.

36 Infantry Division (Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Mississippi): 45, 56, 72, 256-I infantry, 155-I armored, 36-I army brigade.

38 Infantry Division (Indiana, MI, Ohio): 37 and 76 Infantry, 38 I Brigade Army Aviation, 278 Armored Cavalry Regiment.

40-I Infantry Division (California, Oregon, Washington, Hawaii): 29, 41, 79-I infantry, 81-I armored, 40-I army brigade.

42-I Infantry Division (New York, New Jersey, Vermont): 27, 50, 86-I infantry, 42-I army brigade.

Only a tank, in service with the US Army - M1 "Abrams". In the regular parts there are 2397 cars of the most modern modification M1A2 (of which 1814 are even more advanced M1A2SEP). Of the 3326 tanks of the previous version of the M1A1, most were transferred to storage. There is also the oldest version of the Abrams (with a 105-mm cannon, monolithic armor and outdated equipment) - up to 1281 M1 (possibly less, since some of the old tanks are disassembled for parts, some are converted into more modern versions and into engineering vehicles without weapons).

Currently, the main combat vehicle of the US Army - "Stryker", which was produced in 10 modifications. The total number of these machines reaches 4430. It is they who are equipped with the Stryker Brigade, they, as the American command believes, combine combat power (which is lacking in light connections) and mobility (it lacks heavy connections).

Despite the presence in the troops of a significant number of intelligence UAVs, considerable attention is still being paid to ground-based reconnaissance. In service are up to 1719 machines МХNUMX "Bradley" and 3 upgraded BRM of the same type M361A7 BFIST. The Stryker family includes from 3 to 545 BRM M577 itself, 1127 BMTV M131 (with 1128-mm gun), to 105 machines supporting M188, 1131 machines RHBZ M274. In addition, there are 1135 light BRM M465, 1200 М1593 and 1117 German Tpz-128 Fuchs.

BMPs are represented only by M2 “Bradley” machines in the amount of up to 4630 units. In total, the ground forces have a maximum of 6231 BMP M2 and BRM M3 "Bradley", of which 4559 is in the ranks, the rest are in storage.

The most numerous remains the BTR M113A2 / A3, of which 3727 units (another approximately 10 thousands in storage, are gradually being sold abroad). The Stryker family includes, up to 1972, the M1126 BTR itself, the 348 KSHM M1130, and the 168 light engineering M1132, 304 medical machines M1133. The troops have anti-guerrilla armored vehicles, built on the technology of MRAP (with enhanced mine protection). The vast majority of these machines do not have weapons, so they are in fact vehicles, not BBM. After the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, the 5651 armored car Oshkosh and the 2934 MaxxPro (including the 301 medical vehicle) will remain in storage and in storage.

In the US military there is 975 ACS М109А6. Even before 728, the old M109А2 / 3 / 5 ACSs are in storage, where they are gradually being sold abroad or dismantled. The M109 ACS was adopted in 60, but six upgrades have passed, the M1096 variant is considered to meet modern requirements. Includes 821 towed implement M119A2, up to 362 M198, 518 M777A1 / 2. М777 come into service, М198 gradually written off. There are 990 mortars M252, 1076 M120 / M121 and 441 self-propelled M1129 "Stryker."

The 991 MLRS M270 / A1 MLRS and 375 lightweight versions of the same system M142 HIMARS (227 mm) are in service. All MLRS are also PU for OTP ATACMS.

There are 2032 self-propelled Tou ATGMs and several thousand portable Javelin ATGMs.

The basis of the army air defense make up the long-range air defense system "Patriot", which is equipped with all air defense brigades. The brigade includes battalions 2 – 4, each of which has 3 – 4 batteries for 6 – 8 PU (for 4 SAMs on each). Total 1106 PU ZRK "Patriot".

In addition to him, the only active means of ground defense is the Stinger MANPADS. The arsenal consists of several thousands of MANPADS proper, as well as the Avenger 703 short-range air defense system (4 Stinger MANPADS in a Hummer vehicle).

All US Army aircraft perform support functions. These are the 37 reconnaissance and surveillance aircraft RC-12, 9 of Canadian DER Dash-7 aircraft, as well as transport: 140 C-12, 28 UC-35, 11 SA-227 (aka C-26E), 2 Gulfstream, 2, 31 SA-3, 37 6, 27 SA-XNUMX; C-XNUMX, XNUMX C-XNUMX, XNUMX Italian C-XNUMXJ.

The basis of the strike power of army aviation is X-NUMX helicopters AN-769 Apache (64 D, 681 E, production continues). In addition, in storage 88 old combat helicopters AN-16S "Cobra".

Multi-purpose and reconnaissance helicopters can also be classified as combat: up to 525 OH-58 (up to 263 A, up to 157 C, 105 D, 229 D, 10 A, 6 C in storage), 39 MH-6M, and also 61 C in helicopter RE EH-60A and MTR helicopters: 62 MH-47G, 87 MH-60 (31 M, 35 L, 21 K).

Army aviation also includes 123 rescue helicopters HH-60 (32 L, 91 M), 157 training TH-67 and transport: 412 CH-47 (111 D, 301 F), 1534 UH-60 (674 , 599 M, still in storage 261 L), 19 EC290 (European model, manufactured under license under the name UH-145A), up to 72 UH-20.

US ground forces appear to be the only ones in the world with their own fleets. It includes 6 amphibious assault transports such as the Frank Besson and 118 amphibious assault boats of various types.

The new American military strategy practically does not imply the participation of ground forces in hostilities with the exception of the extremely unlikely event of a large-scale conflict. If necessary, the marines that are part of the Navy will fight on land (the level of combat training of its personnel is generally higher than in the ground forces). Upgrading ground forces equipment is proceeding at a rather slow pace, with the purchase of the Stryker BBM, the M777 howitzers, the Apache and UH-72A Lakota helicopters, as well as reconnaissance UAVs and various communications equipment, electronic warfare, etc. the strength of the ground forces remains very high, they are guaranteed to be superior in the foreseeable future to any army in the world except the Chinese and Russian.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    5 November 2016 06: 07
    It is unclear the purpose of the US ground forces .... the defense of the territory of their country or the protection of its interests abroad ... what is the point of containing such a colossus of troops.
    1. +4
      5 November 2016 06: 31
      Well, let's say this is a vestige of the Cold War. The Americans believe that in the event of a military conflict with the involvement of the United States in it, these forces will obviously do.
    2. +9
      5 November 2016 06: 36
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      ... the defense of the territory of your country or the protection of its interests abroad ...

      You yourself answered the question. In order to maintain the status of world master, the states need to ensure their military presence around the world, more precisely, where they could get through. Maintaining remote bases requires a large contingent of troops, these are both combat units and a whole army of support services, add here the management with all headquarters, clerks, secretaries, etc. and it will turn out to be such a horde that America itself cannot feed, arm and clothe, otherwise it will have to cut funding for other projects. To feed this horde, you need a constant influx of finance from the outside, and this is better if you scare someone well with something, for example, "aggression from Russia", and then offer your patronage, of course, "for a certain amount", "do contributions, gentlemen, join NATO. Abroad will help you. " And off we go. But the news is interesting.
      Latest news
      In Jordan, the US military was shot for refusing to undergo inspection
      Instructors of the U.S. Armed Forces, trying to enter the territory of the Jordanian training military base by car, were shot by the Jordanian military right at the gates of the base. It is reported by Reuters, citing sources in the US Army.

      It was previously reported that the military were shot in front of the gates of the Jordanian base because they refused to pass entry control. The instructors did not even stop the car and were killed.

    3. +1
      5 November 2016 10: 19
      If you find out about the appointment of the US Army and the functions of the National Guard, you will not find in the designations of the army the protection of the territory of the USA itself. This they have the National Guard. Conclusions can make a student of grade 5.
      1. +4
        5 November 2016 10: 21
        Quote: doubovitski
        If you find out about the appointment of the US Army and the functions of the National Guard, then you will not find in the designations of the army to protect the territory of the United States

        Will Sir give a reference to confirm his words? wink
        Quote: doubovitski
        Conclusions can make a student 5 class.

        exactly what class are you in?
        1. 0
          6 November 2016 10: 42
          As for the National Guard, I cannot understand one thing - how it ended up in the "Persian Gulf" (and even made up half a group) - the Americans announced that they were mobilizing.
          And why she did not participate in Vietnam for "legal reasons".
          Bush, therefore, did not end up in Vietnam.
          What changed ?
        2. +1
          7 November 2016 10: 58
          Um ... apparently the man meant that in the United States it is forbidden to engage in any measures to restore order of the US Armed Forces. For these purposes, ONLY the units of the National Guard are used, in which only US citizens are allowed to serve, unlike the US Armed Forces, in which you can serve cantract without being a US citizen.
          1. 0
            9 November 2016 03: 59
            In peacetime - before the declaration of war - otherwise why then do we need an army at all.
            We, too, in theory should be engaged in explosives.
            And there is still the territory of military facilities, bases, training ranges - all this is done by the Moscow Region.
            Also with respect to military personnel, the military police have extended rights outside bases. And the same military police organize the movement of transport MO.
    4. +2
      5 November 2016 10: 33
      So that no one would have a thought, about paying off a loan on a US loan of $ 20,000 trillion stop
      1. +1
        5 November 2016 14: 37
        Why pay off this debt - when it can be restructured.
    5. +4
      5 November 2016 11: 18
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      . what's the point of containing such a colossus of troops.

      It’s just that the Pentagon has become accustomed to an enhanced diet during the confrontation with the USSR, which broke up and remained appetite.
    6. +2
      5 November 2016 12: 49
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      . what's the point of containing such a colossus of troops.


      The point is that the United States has single-handedly assumed two roles: the world cashier (with the printing press) and the world gendarme, guarding the activities of this cashier and the printing press. As they say - nothing personal, just business. Hence, hundreds of bases all over the globe, and the scatteredness of military units, and local wars against those who disagree with the concept of "the exclusiveness of the American nation", and the overthrow of the leaders of these "countries that decided to go their own way." Something like that. Yes
      1. +2
        5 November 2016 21: 43
        That's right. A huge army of states is needed to secure the dollar. Who provides the gold currency, and who the army. Gaddafi urged to abandon the dollar, Libya exponentially bombed the very next day.
    7. The comment was deleted.
  2. +6
    5 November 2016 06: 46
    The article is, of course, sensible, there are a lot of beeches and tsifiri, but putting in the title the phrase - "The army that has nowhere to fight", the author, in the course of presenting his thoughts, forgot that this "army" yesterday and today does not crawl out of the Middle East, pokes his nose with his machine guns and machine guns into all the holes that can be found.
    1. +1
      5 November 2016 13: 26
      The article was apparently intended for Wikipedia, but got here by mistake? What is it sensible in? No analytics, opinions, conclusions and conclusions. The author simply listed what and where. What is the article about?
      1. +1
        5 November 2016 20: 03
        Khramchikhin is Khramchikhin. I have been reading it for a long time. Many letters, many numbers. There is no sense only.
        In his articles, the main thing is form, not content. The text looks impressive, but I just want to ask - what did the author want to say?
        1. 0
          6 November 2016 01: 03
          Quote: Reserve officer
          Khramchikhin is Khramchikhin

          The message of all his articles is the same - do not be afraid of pin ... Americans, be afraid of narrow ... Chinese.
  3. +6
    5 November 2016 08: 19
    - they are guaranteed to surpass in the foreseeable future any army in the world, except the Chinese and Russian.
    The US population is more than two times greater than the Russian Federation. And in the event of a global war, the United States will be ready to put in arms much more physically healthy and strong citizens: the potential mobilization reserve of Russia is estimated at 31 million people, the United States at 56 million people. Moreover, a professional mobilization reserve in Russia simply does not exist. The Yankees have a mobilization reserve of more than 1 million people who have a valid contract with the Ministry of Defense, are regularly involved in exercises and combat training and, if necessary, can be called up for active service ...
    1. +6
      5 November 2016 08: 59
      56 million say. Well, you can imagine how they will transfer at least 10% of this amount. Can you imagine well? The meaning of a multi-million army is not questioned in the presence of a land border. As soon as American logistics is turned on, all this turns into one continuous hemorrhoids. It was cool on paper.
      By and large, seditious thought was expressed long ago where the US ground forces could actually be used. First of all, this is the territory of the States themselves and adjacent territories (such as Mexico).
      1. +1
        5 November 2016 11: 22
        Quote: nadezhiva
        By and large, seditious thought was expressed long ago where the US ground forces could actually be used. First of all, this is the territory of the States themselves and adjacent territories (such as Mexico).

        Obama, in his first term as president, signed a decree authorizing the use of the army in the United States. And this is not easy, considering the construction of new prisons and the purchase of plastic coffins in millions of pieces.
    2. +5
      5 November 2016 09: 32
      Quote: knn54
      And in the event of a global war, the United States will be ready to put under arms much more physically healthy and strong citizens:


      a citizen who has become under arms must also be ready to die by order, and not all countries have always succeeded in achieving this.
      there were cases, the army seems to be there, but it doesn’t really want to fight.
      1. +1
        5 November 2016 11: 33
        Quote: Maki Avellievich
        a citizen who has become under arms must also be ready to die by order, and not all countries have always succeeded in achieving this.

        Not only that, not every professional soldier is ready to do this.
        An example is the capture of the 80th British garrison of Singapore by 30 Japanese.
        At the same time, Singapore was quite fortified and had reserves of provisions and weapons for at least one month of defense. The Japanese were much sadder.

        Although it is necessary to make an amendment - the morale of the military personnel is largely dependent on the authority and morale of the commanders. General Percival, the capitulant, was clearly not thinking about the honor and glory of British weapons.
      2. +2
        5 November 2016 12: 54
        Quote: Maki Avellievich
        there were cases, the army seems to be there, but it doesn’t really want to fight.


        But it happens, and vice versa, I got it on the face, but the hunt didn’t disappear, it’s significant to a foreign army under the flag and with the songs.
        1. 0
          5 November 2016 16: 41
          Quote: Lelek
          Quote: Maki Avellievich
          there were cases, the army seems to be there, but it doesn’t really want to fight.


          But it happens, and vice versa, I got it on the face, but the hunt didn’t disappear, it’s significant to a foreign army under the flag and with the songs.

          especially if there is no need to fight, and money "fills" ... Yes
    3. 0
      6 November 2016 01: 08
      Quote: knn54
      The US population is more than two times greater than the Russian Federation.

      Quote: knn54
      Russia's potential mobilization reserve is estimated at 31 million people, the United States - at 56 million people.

      At the same time, during the Second World War, the Americans were able to transfer only one million to Europe, the Russians came to Europe in ten million.
  4. 0
    5 November 2016 08: 24
    If I understand correctly, in the US Army and in service they do not have ZSU? If this is so, then this is either a big miscalculation, or a banal stupidity.
    1. +4
      5 November 2016 08: 54
      In order for ZSU to be required, it is necessary to land on their continent, and this is how easy it is.
  5. +2
    5 November 2016 08: 52
    How many of them have divorced around the world. Dear colossus, that’s why the USA can be defeated only economically. Only in the event of a very strong economic crisis will they have to curtail bases around the world.
    1. +4
      5 November 2016 10: 37
      The economic crisis in the United States automatically leads to a global one. Globalization sir.
      1. 0
        5 November 2016 12: 45
        Quote: MarioG
        The economic crisis in the United States automatically leads to a global one. Globalization sir.

        but crisis still cannot be avoided, can it? Moreover, the longer the crisis is delayed, the worse it will be, and everyone will realize this. Including penguins. But, nevertheless, they continue to delay, hoping that maybe it will blow.
        Maybe then you should not wait, but provoke it yourself?
        1. 0
          5 November 2016 14: 40
          Quote: Felix
          but crisis still cannot be avoided, can it?

          What a fright?
          Quote: Felix
          . But, nevertheless, they continue to delay, hoping that maybe it will blow.

          and what's wrong with that?
          Quote: Felix
          Maybe then you should not wait, but provoke it yourself?

          Every action has its own opposition. This is called economic warfare. Do not be afraid to stay naked without reaching your goals?
          1. +1
            5 November 2016 16: 14
            Quote: MarioG
            What a fright?

            The capitalist model is based on periodic crises, because it is impossible to ensure a constant increase in consumption. The pyramid cannot grow forever, this is an axiom.
            All the rest of my postulates come precisely from this belief of mine.
            As for the naked ass ... I am a Russian, and in my 50 years I have been in this state more than once. And I don’t find anything wrong with that. And you? And what will you do when it suddenly turns out that the bet was made on the wrong field, because the satellites will be bare back before the hegemon, this is also an axiom.
            1. +1
              6 November 2016 07: 49
              Quote: Felix
              The capitalist model is based on periodic crises, because it is impossible to ensure a constant increase in consumption. The pyramid cannot grow forever, this is an axiom.


              Our universe is built like this. maximum possible concentration of energy and then release / release.

              and capitalism, socialism and everything else around us, alas, obeys these axioms. There is no way to escape from crises ...
              1. +1
                6 November 2016 16: 50
                Agree hi That is why I believe that delaying the onset of another crisis is impractical, precisely because of the accumulation of more destructive energy.
        2. 0
          5 November 2016 17: 28
          Quote: MarioG
          The economic crisis in the United States automatically leads to a global one. Globalization sir.

          - It depends on where. In North Korea, almost never notice. And the mumbo-jumbo tribe in the wilds of the Amazon and even more so purple-popindicular ... laughing

          Quote: Felix
          but crisis still cannot be avoided, can it? Moreover, more than
          the late period is delayed, the worse it will be, and everyone will be aware of this.

          But no, why are all central banks buying gold? Prepare an airbag.

          I think - no one believes anymore that Treasuries will be paid off. They are simply not yet ready for a "hard landing" - but at least they bring interest and still some kind of asset.
          1. 0
            5 November 2016 19: 07
            Quote: iConst


            Quote: Felix
            but crisis still cannot be avoided, can it? Moreover, more than
            the late period is delayed, the worse it will be, and everyone will be aware of this.

            But no, why are all central banks buying gold? Prepare an airbag.

            I think - no one believes anymore that Treasuries will be paid off. They are simply not yet ready for a "hard landing" - but at least they bring interest and still some kind of asset.


            The crisis will be expressed elsewhere - all trade relations will need to be re-established, taking into account the new world currency. And this is not one year. The one who wins on the correct currency will win here and one should not think that the penguins are sleeping - they are probably getting ready to earn money and slip another candy wrapper around the crisis again. Not necessarily it will be natural money, maybe some kind of cryptocurrency, or something else ... First, they will tie it to gold, as it was with the dollar, and then, when the need arises, they will again untie it from gold and everything in a circle.
  6. +1
    5 November 2016 09: 53
    Rat, which has nowhere to fight

    This is where there is war. Another thing is that where the United States unleashed conflicts, they use (as the author correctly noted) aviation, the Navy and elite troops.
  7. 0
    5 November 2016 13: 04
    This is precisely the paradox that, with the best skills, USMC equipment has always been a weak point, it’s enough to look at the year when they moved from m60 to abrams and still use cobras.
  8. +1
    5 November 2016 13: 40
    The states have long realized that maintaining their army is very economically advantageous. They need to be guaranteed to spend dollars, which they agreed to borrow from the whole world. Army, defense are the engines of progress. The Americans succeeded in introducing military technologies in the civil interest. And make money.
  9. +1
    7 November 2016 20: 52
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: doubovitski
    If you find out about the appointment of the US Army and the functions of the National Guard, then you will not find in the designations of the army to protect the territory of the United States

    Will Sir give a reference to confirm his words? wink
    Quote: doubovitski
    Conclusions can make a student 5 class.

    exactly what class are you in?

    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Вооружённые_силы_СШ
    А

    If your "higher" education is enough, then after reading all this you yourself will find where and what the US Army is used for.
  10. 0
    17 November 2016 20: 12
    Quote: Expelling Liberoids
    If I understand correctly, in the US Army and in service they do not have ZSU? If this is so, then this is either a big miscalculation, or a banal stupidity.

    They tried. They honestly tried to replace the hopelessly outdated M 163 with something .... Something turned out to be so useless that it ended its career in the field, as targets. I mean Sergeant York. Then they tried a lot and different, even strange, for example, a 75 mm automatic gun and Stingers)))

    Or here)))
    [media = http: //www.armourbook.com/uploads/forum/po

    And as a result zilch. I mean, they could still make a couple of decent samples, but ... the money ran out ...
    Here it seems about 20 pieces for the whole American people bought, and calmed down on this.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"