Military Review

Our nuclear carrier bat was the nightmare of the United States.

25
Domestic floating airfields were able to effectively stand up for themselves and on day X could bring nuclear to the enemy weapon.


Our nuclear carrier bat was the nightmare of the United States.


Illustration from the American brochure "Soviet military power"

The program of creation and combat service of aircraft-carrying cruisers is bright, but, unfortunately, at the present time it is a somewhat forgotten page in stories domestic naval fleet.



Now the former Soviet ships are rusting in China

Anti-submarine cruisers of the Xnumx “Krechet” project at the end of the 1143 and at the beginning of the 80 were capable of attacking those who specialized in criticizing the country's armed forces. It did not take into account that, despite the shortcomings that existed, these ships still played a role in the nuclear confrontation with the United States and the NATO bloc. No wonder that the propaganda edition of the US Department of Defense "Soviet military power" regularly frightened them.



In the Soviet years it was never reported anywhere that these aircraft carrying cruisers carry nuclear weapons.

Of course, the deck attack aircraft vertical takeoff and landing of the Yak-38 and Yak-36M did not have any exceptional characteristics, but could carry nuclear weapons. We are talking about tactical bombs PH-28. In addition, nuclear depth bomb could carry Ka-25 and Ka-27 helicopters. Also a special warhead could be equipped with anti-ship cruise missiles "Basalt".



"Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov" in its characteristics far exceeds domestic aircraft carriers of the first generation
Originator:
http://vestnik-rm.ru/news-4-17953.htm
25 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Homo
    Homo 5 November 2016 15: 43
    +1
    Another hint of "the boss is all gone"?
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 6 November 2016 00: 59
      0
      Domestic floating airfields were able to effectively stand up for themselves and on day X could bring down nuclear weapons on the enemy.

      This is the move! lol
      Talk about what was not in the past tense and as a fait accompli! Afftap zhzhot! Stop taking wishful thinking. We never had aircraft carriers! Helicopter carriers, yes. It's time to know such things. And no so far. And they are very necessary in the light of current world events, as it turns out in practice.
      Bullshit article.
  2. Locomotive
    Locomotive 5 November 2016 15: 51
    +10
    What was it? What is this little opus about?))
  3. wolf1945
    wolf1945 5 November 2016 15: 51
    +5
    Such a country was destroyed by such a potential! soldier
  4. Old26
    Old26 5 November 2016 16: 15
    +3
    Quote: Steam Train
    What was it? What is this little opus about?))

    About nothing. Almost all ships of the 1st rank carried nuclear weapons. Well, it's better not to remember the performance characteristics of Yakov and the range of weapons. In fact, only "Basalts" carried the threat to the foe
  5. andrewkor
    andrewkor 5 November 2016 16: 23
    +4
    Let's put Reagan and Kuzya next to each other and keep quiet !!
    1. KaPToC
      KaPToC 6 November 2016 00: 42
      +1
      Quote: andrewkor
      Let's put Reagan and Kuzya next to each other and keep quiet !!

      The case when they scold for "silver" is such a phenomenon in sports. The aircraft carrier component of our fleet is the second largest in the world after the Americans.
      1. GSH-18
        GSH-18 6 November 2016 01: 05
        0
        Quote: KaPToC
        The carrier component of our fleet is the second most powerful in the world after the Americans.

        Did you understand what you wrote?
        We have not one Aircraft Carrier, but among the Amer, there are TEN of them and they are still building.
        1. KaPToC
          KaPToC 6 November 2016 19: 00
          0
          Quote: GSH-18
          We have not one Aircraft Carrier, but among the Amer, there are TEN of them and they are still building.

          Russian was written to you in white SECOND, American - FIRST. Hindus are third, Chinese are fourth. And that's it, the rest have VTOL.
          And we will not fight with the Americans as aircraft carriers.
  6. Vz.58
    Vz.58 5 November 2016 16: 41
    +2
    The title of the article itself causes laughter among knowledgeable people.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 5 November 2016 16: 49
      +1
      Quote: Vz.58
      The title of the article itself causes laughter among knowledgeable people.

      for having an orgasm for the "patriots" ... and about "Now the former Soviet ships are rusting in China" .. can you in more detail?
      1. Severomor
        Severomor 7 November 2016 12: 34
        0
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        and what about "Now the former Soviet ships are rusting in China" .. can you get more details?


        Back in 2013, the article was

        https://topwar.ru/36761-sovetskie-avianesuschie-k
        reysery-v-kitae.html
    2. GSH-18
      GSH-18 6 November 2016 01: 06
      0
      Quote: Vz.58
      The title of the article itself causes laughter among knowledgeable people.

      Exactly. Totally agree with you Yes
      Why publish such nonsense on a normal tamatic site? request
  7. masiya
    masiya 5 November 2016 17: 19
    +1
    But this does not scare them ???
    1. Vz.58
      Vz.58 5 November 2016 17: 27
      +3
      Not scary. They, too, do not stand still
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 5 November 2016 21: 13
      +2
      This is not yet in service and is not mass-produced - so "this" does not frighten them.
  8. faiver
    faiver 5 November 2016 18: 57
    +1
    about nothing and no how ...
  9. Old26
    Old26 5 November 2016 19: 28
    +1
    Quote: masiya
    But this does not scare them ???

    Drawing from a calendar made in Photoshop? No, it’s not scary.
  10. tinibar
    tinibar 5 November 2016 19: 39
    +2
    Quote: Old26
    Quote: Steam Train
    What was it? What is this little opus about?))

    About nothing. Almost all ships of the 1st rank carried nuclear weapons. Well, it's better not to remember the performance characteristics of Yakov and the range of weapons. In fact, only "Basalts" carried the threat to the foe

    Well, not only that. Thanks to the fleet of anti-submarine helicopters, cruisers were good PLO ships. And the shortcomings of the Yak-38 were well-known even then, and it was not by chance that they worked intensively to replace it, due to which an excellent Yak-141 (Yak-41) appeared. And in the case of the launch of a series of this aircraft and the modernization of all Krechetov under it, a rather formidable force would turn out! By the way, Baku, later Gorshkov, was already under construction under the Yak-141. It’s a pity the country was surrendered earlier ...
  11. Old26
    Old26 5 November 2016 21: 24
    0
    Quote: tinibar
    Well, not only that. Thanks to the fleet of anti-submarine helicopters, cruisers were good PLO ships. And the shortcomings of the Yak-38 were well-known even then, and it was not by chance that they worked intensively to replace it, due to which an excellent Yak-141 (Yak-41) appeared. And in the case of the launch of a series of this aircraft and the modernization of all Krechetov under it, a rather formidable force would turn out! By the way, Baku, later Gorshkov, was already under construction under the Yak-141. It’s a pity the country was surrendered earlier ...

    You wrote everything correctly. But that's just the modernization of "Krechetov", and the Yak-41/141 - it was all PERSPECTIVE. And the title of the article on the aviation nuclear club is little consistent with the realities. Yes, there were anti-ship missiles with nuclear charges on board. Yes, perhaps it was a good PLO ship. But not more. Not at all aircraft carriers, much less nuclearaviation with a club.
    In reality, YAKs simply could not do anything with an enemy who had aircraft carriers. I'm afraid even the British "Invincibles" with deck "Harriers" were more dangerous for the enemy than ours with "Yaks" (in terms of aviation components)
  12. proud
    proud 5 November 2016 21: 44
    +1
    Article about nothing
  13. romandostalo
    romandostalo 5 November 2016 22: 36
    +1
    Some garbage ...
  14. burigaz2010
    burigaz2010 6 November 2016 01: 25
    0
    And what is this article about?
    1. Loyotta
      Loyotta 6 November 2016 01: 57
      0
      Good article. But who is afraid of all this? More would be.
  15. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 7 November 2016 16: 33
    0
    What was it.......... belay