Censorship came, milk brought

50
Censorship came, milk broughtSorry about myself.

Maybe this is not modest, but this is the case: since I publish my books (I write articles in half of the federal editions of Russia, sing songs, act in videos and in movies, give lectures, hold festivals, manage the site and print media, speak on the radio, etc.) - that is, since the end of 90, I have, as it happened, been taking a rather radical stance towards the current government.



My comrades and I held rallies, I was repeatedly detained by law enforcement services, I have one criminal case and a dozen administrative cases in my luggage. My comrades, from among the radical oppositionists, were sitting in jails - for political reasons. Including, Nizhegorodets Yury Staroverov.

In general, what just was not.

Those who read my articles and books are in the know; who did not read - and all right.

I want to say only one thing: it is impossible to speak seriously about any censorship that limits my freedom, as it is magnificently called, creativity.
Here I had a novel “Pathology” - about events in the Caucasus. They were going to film him a couple of times, but both times they said: “... you know, brother, after all, the theme of Chechnya is painful; in general, we are not recommended. And do not give money.

Well, do not recommend, okay.

Not filmed for this book of the film.

Or I have a novel "Sanya" - about the actions of the left youth opposition in Russia at the turn of the end of 90-x-beginning of the "zero". Three times they were going to film the novel, every time well-known directors - and each time the same story repeated: “... you know, mate, after all the theme of the opposition is painful; in general, we are not recommended. ”

Well, do not recommend, okay.

Not removed and this book of the film.

But can I write my own books? Can. They are sold, they are freely available in libraries throughout the country.

My clips - including the possibility of a coup d'état in Russia - were freely broadcast through several channels, and so far no one interferes with the web.

I'm not talking about dozens of anti-government articles that I wrote in the period from 1999 to 2014; Yes, and now sometimes written, although much less.

I declare to you responsibly: in those areas where I have to work — literature, journalism, music — there is little or no censorship.
For example, if we talk about music, “radium format” implies much greater severity or, if I may say so, “taste”.

Moreover, the last two years have brought a kind of censorship of a completely different sense.

I led columnist columns in at least five Russian glossy magazines. In difficult times, this job gave me half the family income.
Five more glossy magazines published me from time to time.

All this work - by ten, and even more glossy magazines ended - literally! - one day. On the day of the annexation of the Crimea.

That is, all these people, without saying a word, excluded me from the list of their authors and collaborators. No one has ever called me from these publications. They did not even try to explain themselves. How cut off.

It turned out that these were not ten different “glossy” magazines, but one very solid world.

So what?

Over the past two years, I was even loudly loud about this. Do not publish - and damn them. There is such a thing as an “editorial policy”. According to their “editorial policy” immediately after reunification with the Crimea, I suddenly became professionally unfit. Nothing can be done about it.
Do I have the courage to frown at it and say something about censorship about it? Not. I myself will be funny to talk about it.

Hands in place, head on shoulders: we will find another place to work.

In the end, all these things - relating to me personally, and to individual theater directors, and some musicians - no matter what views they hold - can go through the category of “excesses”.

Similar excesses take place in any country of the world.

In any European country, and in the USA, and in Australia, and in Canada, and in Israel, there are writers, musicians, and entire theaters from Russia, who will never be invited, their texts will not be translated, songs will be sung, and performances will not be shown. Just because they will not. Point.

Moreover, they have their own writers, musicians, and entire theaters, to which for one reason or another they have blocked oxygen. Either completely or partially.
Is it correct?

Wrong. But the world is so constituted, and this has nothing to do with “Stalinism” or “tyranny”.

All this hype interests me only in one aspect.

At once I will make a reservation that from this moment on my approach to this subject will be deeply, irreparably subjective.

Quickly looking at the tape News, I saw the names of artists who opposed censorship as a united front.

We will not touch free artists - what is the demand from them.

We are talking exclusively about those who have this or that relationship with the state.

No one saw or heard the names of these people at the time of the Crimean history: when hundreds of thousands of Russian people in the squares of Crimea asked to stand up for them.

Then these artists were quietly silent.

No one has seen or heard the names of these people at the time of Syrian history: when the Russian military fought against the whole progressive world. And fighting to this day.

And, of course, no one hopes to hear at least one word from these people about the situation in Donbas - when hundreds of thousands of people are asked to recognize them as Russians and stop killing.

With all that people in the Crimea, people in the Donbas understand and support the majority of Russian citizens. And the meaning of what is happening in Syria is well aware of the same thing.

In this case, our creative people have imposed two years of censorship on themselves, like a penance: not to say a word, not to give a hand, not to nod my head, or to wink.

The problem of the death in the Donbas of ten thousand people did not find in two years any - that is, no at all! - reflections neither in the theater nor in the cinema.
Maybe they were forbidden to our creators? No, for the most part, they themselves have forbidden even to think on these topics.

Maybe this was not a request? No, the request was huge.

Is there any reason in this silence to search for social dissonance or some other contradiction?

No, in essence, there are no contradictions.

Some people fight, die in battles or under bombing, others paint, look for rhymes, shout “Taken!”, Look for their eternal “A minor” on the guitar.
All in their places.

I write this text in Donetsk, and at the moment I hear the distinct sound of a shootout. About five kilometers from where I am, there is a battle. Are there many cultural figures in Russia who care about this fight? Not sure.

Or rather, so: I am sure that they are in the overwhelming minority.

But if there are those who write, sing, shoot and put in the theater everything they want, then there must be others. Those that say everything they want about those who write, shoot and put in the theater.

We live in a free country. You owe us nothing, we give you. Nobody owes me anything either, and I don’t even ask.

And at the same time our amazing, tyrannical, flashy, mischievous, immense, stoopic and barking state manages us to reconcile with each other.

There would not be this state, could reach the beatings.

And so - the guy who sprayed gas at the concert of Andrei Makarevich (no one was hurt) - got five years and is in prison. And Makarevich gives a tour from Kiev to Lviv.

Why not life, the right word?

Need to rejoice.

“I don’t know another such country ...”
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    4 November 2016 15: 14
    Cry from the heart. And now I have a question, so whose censorship is ours? Statisticians or liberals.
    1. +8
      4 November 2016 16: 20
      Quote: svp67
      so whose censorship is ours? Statisticians or liberals.

      Censorship is money, censorship itself
      Who pays the money, and engages the girl. There is still censorship of the LAW, prohibited — inciting ethnic hatred and war, insulting the feelings of believers, calls for the overthrow of power by force, propaganda of fascism ...... And what is the debate about? Who makes the laws? Whom the majority has chosen and accepts. hi "Bolsheviks" if you like! lol
      1. +1
        4 November 2016 17: 28
        Exactly, self-censorship .. Flight of the soul, write what you want .. And then? And then somewhere in the depths of your soul you overwhelm, but if you manage to publish your work? Will you not understand the power? Will block the oxygen, people will not understand, they will zaplyuyut? Well-stepped over it went to the publishing house, and gentlemen are sitting there and thinking the same thing .. Here we live. And you are censorship .. What you want and write ..
    2. +3
      5 November 2016 02: 50
      Zakhar had a mental breakdown like for the Reds or for the Whites. About three years ago, he posted his thoughts on this on the website "However". The forum supported him. You can't bury talent in the ground, but position is important. Time is like that. If Zakhar sensed "censorship", then this is not the state, but liberoids - zealous holders of glossy magazines for whores and fagots. However, there are many of them in the state. Zakhar, you can become a classic if you don’t trade your conscience. You are on the right track now. Good luck darling! hi
  2. sq
    +3
    4 November 2016 15: 16
    Freelancer. Although he has something rational. I did not understand just what the article was about, what the idea was.
    1. +2
      5 November 2016 02: 57
      And you read Prilepin thoughtfully and questions will disappear. He's the right guy. Then Lermontov's "A lonely sail whitens" comes to mind.
  3. +3
    4 November 2016 15: 31
    The author of the article answers his own writings and confirms one wise popular saying ... to a vigorous cow, God did not give horns ... She’s such a life, there’s nothing to go where the dog doesn’t stick his nose. Therefore, Russia still exists on the world map due to the inadmissibility such “truth-loving people” to “clever obscurantism.” Maybe these authors are “truth-loving people.” push Russia to the abyss.
  4. +2
    4 November 2016 15: 44
    Look how Donetsk looks
    I myself shot
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6vD1ItbGOY
    1. +3
      4 November 2016 18: 06
      This is inserted simply:
      1. +3
        4 November 2016 18: 21
        I watched your video. It remains only to envy the quality of the road surface and not being overloaded with vehicles. And yes, I wanted to sit on my Izh Jupiter-3 and ride. It’s a pity, Ishachka has long been gone. crying
      2. 0
        5 November 2016 07: 02
        The cleanliness of the city is very watched. All. Residents plant a lot of flowers, trees.
        They began to appreciate simple joys more. They smile at primroses, birds.
      3. 0
        5 November 2016 08: 46
        Now (!) A team of 5 workers is cleaning the curbs (and you think it's a day off).
      4. +1
        5 November 2016 09: 39
        Thank you for the film and comments. I’ll add that there is not only optimism but also pride in our homeland. We have a lot of people working from there in the Belgorod region, and when asked if you guys are from Ukraine, it always sounds, no, we are from Donbas. Sincerely.
  5. 0
    4 November 2016 15: 46
    There is a good film about Donbass. '' True target 102. '' I recommend .
  6. 0
    4 November 2016 15: 59
    and how much now to sell the HOMELAND !?
    1. +11
      4 November 2016 16: 21
      how much now to sell the HOMELAND !?


      This is a question for them-

      Wow, how many of them, but how many are in the shade ..............
      1. +7
        5 November 2016 01: 25
        how much now to sell the HOMELAND !?


        “To not ours”

        Oh you who want
        Transform, ruin us
        And Germanize Russia! Take heed
        My heartfelt exclamation!
        Whoever you are, a fellow
        And my brother: is the old man miserable,
        Her solemn traitor
        Her arrogant slanderer;
        Or you sweet-talking scribe
        Oracle of the youth of the ignoramus,
        You frivolous companion
        Dissolute thoughts and hopes;
        And you, innocent and amiable
        A fan of dark books and words
        The perceiver is gracious
        Other people's judgments and sins;
        You arrogant and daring people,
        You reckless stronghold
        Teachings of the school of the godless,
        You all are not Russian people!
        Do not like you holy work
        And the glory of our antiquity;
        Doesn’t live in you, it’s dead in you
        Native feeling. You are full
        Not that tall and beautiful
        Love, to the motherland, not the one
        The fire is pure, the flame is clear
        Lifts you up; lives in you
        Love is not for truth and good;
        The voice of the people - he is the voice of God -
        He does not give rise to courage in you,
        He is alien, he is strange, wild for us.
        Our best traditions to you
        They sound funny, meaningless;
        Mighty great grandfathers deed
        They don’t tell you anything;
        Your pride despises them.
        The shrine of the ancient Kremlin,
        Hope, strength, our fortress -
        Nothing to you! Russian land
        Enlightenment will not be accepted from you,

        You are scary to her: you are in love
        In your treacherous opinions
        And blasphemous dreams!
        Blasphemy and flattery
        Do not you transform it,
        You who do not know how with her
        Neither live, nor sing, nor speak!

        Your anger will be silent
        Your language will die incorrectly: -
        Strong, reliable Holy Russia,
        And the Russian God is still great!

        Nikolay Yazykov

        Written in 1844 year - 172 years ago, but as if about the currenttheir "non-our" Akhedzhakhovs, Raikins, Mironovs, tobacco, Chubais and others, etc.
        1. +1
          5 November 2016 07: 06
          Thank you so much!
  7. +7
    4 November 2016 16: 25
    the guy who sprayed gas at a concert by Andrei Makarevich (no one was hurt) got five years and is in prison. And Makarevich gives a tour from Kiev to Lviv.
    The guy’s deed can be understood, it’s impossible to forgive. And if in the zone of gas exposure there was a sick person, well, for example, a severe form of asthma? Will this guy reanimate him if he gets sick? And if a person with severe allergic reactions? there are a lot of such unfortunately. What about a heart attack? A repeated heart attack? A hypertonic? and baby, finally! so I think that he deserved the punishment rightfully. But the severity of this punishment should be discussed by lawyers. 5 years on vskidku- a bit too much if no one was hurt, of course ...
    1. 0
      4 November 2016 21: 54
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      And if in the zone of gas exposure there was a sick person, well, for example, a severe form of asthma? Will this guy reanimate him if he gets sick? And if a person with severe allergic reactions? there are a lot of such unfortunately. What about a heart attack? A repeated heart attack? A hypertonic?

      And do not hell in the macaroni range Yes
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      so I think that he deserved the punishment rightfully.

  8. +10
    4 November 2016 16: 26
    Censorship is needed !!! Pushkin, Dostoevsky, Gogol - they did it, it didn’t interfere with them, like a sieve was separated from all ingenious and talented sieve. Under censorship, Bondarchuk Art., Shukshin, Gaidai and others filmed !, and in the 90's zero what except vulgarity and naked asses? Permissiveness is evil.
    1. +6
      4 November 2016 17: 50
      My friend! You have censored censorship with editing. Editing - this is the process of selecting grains from sex, and censorship is when the work is BRILLIANT, but some kind of blouse squinted and says no, it’s impossible ... There is a hint at the Tsar (order, faith, statehood, etc.) And a brilliant work finishes in the fireplace ...
  9. +1
    4 November 2016 16: 38
    I left LJ in 2011 precisely because my topics were deleted without explanation.
    1. 0
      5 November 2016 22: 50
      If the topic has no quirks and it makes sense to discuss it, we will discuss it. If Putin is to blame for everything, then you’ll be on the Censor
      1. 0
        6 November 2016 12: 44
        No, oh everything was.
  10. +8
    4 November 2016 16: 50
    And I will voice, unlike Zakhar, one name.
    The mouthpiece of statehood and foreign policy of the Kremlin, the Kremlin nightingale, Soloviev, before joining the Crimea, asked one old woman a question on his broadcast: Why do you need this Crimea?
    And at the beginning of the XNUMXs he was leading a very sharp program on the "silver rain", probably trying hard to forget where he put, put and put on power in the morning. And then for a long time and tediously sought a handshake from the Kremlin ... I finally got it. What is one plot worth with the presentation of a medal by Himself. How much servility and obsequiousness in a calculated bow with bent knees in this plot. Such one will betray "with an unwavering hand" in the hour of testing ... And how many of them, demons divorced ...
    1. +3
      4 November 2016 17: 53
      You can add Kiselev. His inferior record, where he praises the Ukrainian people and television in full embroidery, is also still stored on the Internet. And, in general, until 2013, his rhetoric was not so specific ...
  11. +2
    4 November 2016 17: 38
    Well, if it is no longer an undersized correspondent, but a person who is officially considered a writer, writes “in Donbass” instead of “in Donbass,” then the question of using censorship is probably really ripe. Purely for the sake of preserving the Russian language. No matter how attractive to the masses "Albany."
    1. +13
      4 November 2016 17: 49
      Well, if it is no longer an undersized correspondent, but a person officially considered a writer, he writes "in Donbass" instead of "in Donbass",
      -----------------------------------------
      You are stupid, my friend, For remembering what happened "IN the Urals ...", or "IN holy Russia" and even more so "ON sacred land" Your claims to the writer go ON ....!
    2. +5
      4 November 2016 17: 54
      But what about the expressions "in the Kuban", "in the Urals"? Also the machinations of under-censorship?
    3. MSL
      +4
      4 November 2016 23: 08
      Quote: KAA_57
      the question of using censorship is probably actually ripe. Purely for the sake of preserving the Russian language. No matter how attractive to the masses "Albany."

      You, sir, would have to learn. The Russian language is powerful and multifaceted. Sorry you do not know him.
  12. +7
    4 November 2016 18: 19
    Whoever pays calls the tune. Well, the artists. So it turns out that the state (that is, WE and YOU) paid 230 lemons per year for Satyricon. But I didn't order that kind of music. And let K. Raikin sing for me then, and not what he raises. Or let him look for another sponsor.
  13. +5
    4 November 2016 18: 47
    I personally do not want the state to give my money to people like Raikin and others like him!
    I do not accept such "art"!
  14. 0
    4 November 2016 20: 08
    Something I can’t understand, we have a military-patriotic site or what ?! Soon there will be an article on dandruff and tamps? What about the site ?!
    Where is the feedback from the administration? I think such a BRIGHT button should be! To ask questions directly.
  15. +3
    4 November 2016 20: 21
    Previously, people read books, watched good films, did not know anything about censorship. Now we know everything about censorship, only there is nothing to see and read.
    1. +2
      4 November 2016 21: 04
      Quote: sedan
      but there’s nothing to see and read.

      Oh come on. offhand:
      Etc. etc. hi
  16. +1
    4 November 2016 20: 55
    . They don’t publish - and to hell with them.
    The talent for that is given by God to make his way. Write, shoot videos, do what you want, but not at the state’s expense (at the final stage, our account!) Whoever wants what will see!
    In this case, our creative people have imposed two years of censorship on themselves, like a penance: not to say a word, not to give a hand, not to nod my head, or to wink.
    Integration (from the word "cart") - where it is tasty, there is the homeland (deliberately with a small letter)!

    Five kilometers from the place where I am, there is a battle. Are there many cultural figures in Russia who care about this fight? Not sure.
    Kostik will certainly not show "a gopher under fire"!
  17. +1
    4 November 2016 21: 09
    Quote: Oles
    Putin and Ramzanka - then look at these inadequacies, do you want them in power? The scammer is as old as the world


    Great, the breeder. But then offer a decent candidate that will be better. You can’t offer it, because there are none and cannot be in principle. We do not live in paradise.
  18. +1
    4 November 2016 21: 13
    Quote: rus-5819
    Write, shoot clips, do what you want, but not at the state’s expense (in the end, our bill!)


    Yeah, yeah, yeah. For some reason, without state control, they shoot mostly only leviathans, green elephants, five bottles of vodka, a head, a load of 200 and other stars and trash. Allegedly "free creativity". "This is how we see it."
    1. +3
      4 November 2016 23: 58
      The shooting of Leviathan was sponsored by the state, in the person of the cinema fund.
  19. +2
    4 November 2016 22: 25
    how many executioner bastards accumulated and, according to the new Duma convocation, everyone indiscriminately picked up the old ones, they didn’t shoot them and new unverified scum they picked up, I think the CIA and the US State Department should be happy how many new opportunities appeared to create new zones of influence in Russia.
  20. +1
    5 November 2016 06: 39
    Great!
    Great respect!
  21. +1
    5 November 2016 07: 56
    Quote: VEKT
    The shooting of Leviathan was sponsored by the state, in the person of the cinema fund.


    Who do you think is in the cinema fund? The most liberal color sits there, handshake and untouchable. And if you try to touch it, a universal howl will rise about "the persecution of the bloody regime for free creativity and about overwhelming censorship." What exactly is the article about.
  22. +1
    5 November 2016 08: 59
    Is that censorship ?! Here in Dill, censorship is a sheer delight. In one fell swoop, 140 cultural figures of the Russian Federation were censored and entry into the Garden of Eden dill and parsley was banned. Scale! And you say ...
  23. 0
    5 November 2016 13: 34
    Quote: svp67
    Cry from the heart. And now I have a question, so whose censorship is ours? Statisticians or liberals.

    ----------------------
    Money and nepotism of officials. If you somehow offend one of our bonzes, then you will not see the work, these creatures are vindictive ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"