Military Review
Sign In Register

"Kalashnikov" developed "unbreakable" drone

38
Rosgvardiya will receive unmanned vehicles protected from interception by enemy EW equipment, according to News.


"Kalashnikov" developed "unbreakable" drone


The drone, developed by ZALA AERO GROUP (part of Kalashnikov), ignores any commands from another source, and in case of loss of communication with the operator, it switches to automatic mode and returns to the base independently.

“The ZALA 16E5 UAV is capable of conducting aerial reconnaissance while in the air for up to 16 hours in a row and transmitting an image to the operator at a distance of up to 150 km. The composition of the onboard equipment of the flying drone includes a photo and video camera, night vision devices and a thermal imager. And the images received from them are superimposed on each other, allowing the operator to observe the area at any time of the day.

“Currently, an unmanned aircraft 16E5 engine undergoes factory tests, which will last until the end of this year. According to the results of the tests, the drone received a number of improvements, among them the replacement of an electric motor with a more compact and powerful internal combustion engine, which made it possible to increase the duration of the flight and the maximum speed several times. Already at the beginning of 2017, we are planning to put the UAV under test in Rosgvardiyu ", - Nikita Khamitov, a company representative, told the newspaper.

The wingspan of the vehicle exceeds 5 meters, its weight is no more than 30 kg, it is launched using a catapult.
Photos used:
RIA News. Vladimir Astapkovich
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
38 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Monos
    Monos 3 November 2016 10: 44
    +22
    Only a sledgehammer can be unbreakable. smile Everything else is hacked with varying degrees of complexity.
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 3 November 2016 10: 48
      +10
      The sledgehammer can also be "hacked" by taking it away from the wearer and turning it against him drinks
      1. Giant thought
        Giant thought 3 November 2016 10: 59
        +3
        If there is a very good hacking system for this drone, then this is very good, and the tests could have been carried out in Syria too, they would have been able to find out exactly what this device is capable of.
        1. Black Colonel
          Black Colonel 3 November 2016 11: 16
          +1
          Is there anything to crack?
          1. Baikal
            Baikal 3 November 2016 11: 45
            0
            When looking at the photo of the drone, the question involuntarily arose:
            these wing downs - when taking off from the catapult it seems like everything is ok, but how will he land with them? Or is it a disposable device?)
            1. swan
              swan 3 November 2016 12: 50
              +2
              Devices of this class land, banally, by parachute.
              It makes no sense to make a complex landing system and chassis.
              1. Baikal
                Baikal 3 November 2016 18: 11
                0
                Thanks for the answer hi
            2. Yuyuka
              Yuyuka 3 November 2016 21: 45
              0
              When looking at the photo of the drone, the question involuntarily arose:
              these wing downs - when taking off from the catapult it seems like everything is ok, but how will he land with them? Or is it a disposable device?)

              This is so that the enemy breaks his head winked finally there are three drones - two other wingtips up feel as I want and fly wassat
        2. iConst
          iConst 3 November 2016 11: 25
          +4
          Quote: Monos
          Only a sledgehammer can be unbreakable. smile Everything else is hacked with varying degrees of complexity.

          Yes Yes. If you connect a supercomputer (takes from a large room to floors), then can try.
          Hacking available means (and it is certainly possible) will take some couple of hundred years (optimistic).

          Quote: Thought Giant
          If there is a very good hacking system for this drone, then this is very good

          By "anti-hacking systems" we mean banal encryption. And the strength depends mainly on the key length and less on the algorithm.

          For example, before starting the device is synchronized with the receiving station - a set of disposable keys is generated. In the process, the keys are changed according to a certain algorithm.
          While you are calculating one key, the system will already switch to another by a time interval or by an algorithm command.

          There are also algorithms for recognizing hacking attempts - the control channel is cut off and the device goes to the base by an inertial orientation system or by a map of the area, which the device itself removed during the flight.
          1. Monos
            Monos 3 November 2016 11: 37
            +10
            Quote: iConst
            Hacking available means (and it is certainly possible) will take some couple of hundred years (optimistic).

            I beg of you! By means of electronic warfare I drowned out dviglo (for example) and catch the bird. Or EMP. Hacking is not necessarily about taking control. The purpose of the hack is to gain control over the device. MANPADS in the "ass" is also a kind of "hacking". laughing
            1. iConst
              iConst 3 November 2016 12: 12
              +2
              Quote: Monos
              I beg of you! By means of electronic warfare I drowned out dviglo (for example) and catch the bird. Or EMP. Hacking is not necessarily about taking control. The purpose of the hack is to gain control over the device. MANPADS in the "ass" is also a kind of "hacking".

              Stupidity on stupidity. And there’s nothing to comment on laughing
              1. Monos
                Monos 3 November 2016 13: 28
                +6
                .
                Quote: iConst
                Stupidity on stupidity. And there’s nothing to comment on

                Clever and informative. Nice to debate with latent Einstein.
          2. KAV
            KAV 3 November 2016 13: 10
            +1
            If you connect a supercomputer (takes from a large room to floors), then you can try.

            By "anti-hacking systems" we mean banal encryption. And the strength depends mainly on the key length and less on the algorithm.

            Well yes. And the breaking speed also depends on the channel width. And if the channel is narrow, then at least a hundred supercomputers plug in - you won’t get the result. In addition, there are protection systems against brute force and other hacking attempts.
            Including, not everything is so simple to crack.
      2. Monos
        Monos 3 November 2016 11: 54
        +4
        Quote: BlackMokona
        The sledgehammer can also be "hacked" by taking it away from the wearer and turning it against him drinks

        smile In this case, the "hacking" of the sledgehammer operator will be carried out, which is also not bad.
    2. svp67
      svp67 3 November 2016 10: 53
      +2
      Quote: Monos
      Only a sledgehammer can be unbreakable. Everything else is hacked with varying degrees of complexity.

      Yeah, then hack these "airplanes"
      1. pimen
        pimen 3 November 2016 12: 34
        0
        in vain you believe in them like that. There is an ignition system, there is an ignition coil with a large inductance ... the model is very vulnerable to EMI on the engine
        1. MarioG
          MarioG 4 November 2016 01: 18
          +1
          Quote: pimen
          There is an ignition system, there is an ignition coil with a large inductance ...

          If you are so smart, then calculate how much power this very reb must have in order to drown out the ignition coil, say at least 2 km away?
          And the simplest question is, what type of antenna should the transmitter have?
    3. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 3 November 2016 11: 30
      0
      Only a sledgehammer can be unbreakable

      There was a joke about this in Soviet times, and maybe the truth. Ours wondered why the Japanese bought our sledgehammers. It turned out that they made razor blades of their metal and sold including and in the USSR. It seems to me that in the age of computerization, Kulibins will always be found.
      1. Hariton laptev
        Hariton laptev 3 November 2016 12: 43
        +1
        it was just not sledgehammers but axes, and they wondered why there were no axes of forests in Japan, and those that were public property were not subject to deforestation.
    4. g1v2
      g1v2 3 November 2016 12: 29
      +2
      I came to work last week and discovered a broken iron sledgehammer in half. Not even welding. I was in shock. Who broke it is not recognized by anyone. So I’m thinking how to write it off.
      1. Yuyuka
        Yuyuka 3 November 2016 18: 57
        0
        I came to work last week and discovered a broken iron sledgehammer in half. Not even welding. I was in shock. Who broke it is not recognized by anyone. So I’m thinking how to write it off.

        Decorate as a Ratsukha for manufacturing a collapsible sledgehammer wassat
    5. Pajamas
      Pajamas 3 November 2016 17: 22
      0
      Quote: Monos
      Only a sledgehammer can be unbreakable. smile Everything else is hacked with varying degrees of complexity.

      If you have a code length greater than the message itself, the number of messages is one, then talk about hacking is a fiction.
  2. Ustrushan
    Ustrushan 3 November 2016 10: 46
    +4
    Technology is not in place. What does not crack today, tomorrow will be hushed like seeds. Nevertheless, I am very glad that domestic news are appearing.
  3. Voyager
    Voyager 3 November 2016 10: 49
    +4
    The logic is simple. Through such high-profile statements, Samopiar allows you to turn your eyes and means to yourself. Our partners regularly do the same, these are the rules of the market today :)
    1. dauria
      dauria 3 November 2016 11: 11
      +2
      "ignores any commands coming from someone else's source"- it would be strange if I did not ignore it. lol This is the rule of any modern home radio control equipment more than 50 bucks. Now, if the signal is "smeared" across the spectrum to the noise level. Although, they may have done so, and this is not a novelty. After all, he must be completely autonomous, with his own brains. Preferably not chicken. At 30 kg, you can already "stick" them in.
      Tfu you, this is for "Rosgvardia", and why bother? Would buy a Chinese "Sky-fly". Or did "white tape" and drug lords have electronic warfare?
  4. V.ic
    V.ic 3 November 2016 11: 00
    +1
    30 kg, is launched using a catapult.

    Modify the catapult to a launch weight of 100 kg and five thousand times more powerful ... Offer the Americans as a substitute for the Soyuz when launching astronauts. M. b. any of them will survive the acceleration at startup ... lol
  5. shtanko.49
    shtanko.49 3 November 2016 11: 10
    +1
    They will shoot down with buckshot, it is better cheaper and more.
    1. IrbisRus
      IrbisRus 3 November 2016 11: 17
      +1
      No, we are not looking for simple ways. Yes, and the budget *** to master *** nice.
  6. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 3 November 2016 11: 18
    +1
    Dviglo (ICE) interesting domestic test?
  7. russmensch
    russmensch 3 November 2016 11: 29
    0
    So it is not hackable ...? Something is hard to believe. Here on the cars they put "cool" anti-theft systems, even satellite tracking and so on ... And such cars are hijacked for "one spit". Even equipment such as scanners is on sale. So it will be here. For a month or two, they may fly as promised, and then everything will return to normal.
    1. Hapfri
      Hapfri 3 November 2016 12: 52
      +1
      You need to have your little man in the service center. This is the mystery of hijacking
  8. Operator
    Operator 3 November 2016 11: 48
    0
    Hike, it's time to convert the Kalashnikov Concern to what it does best (UAV) and transfer the production of assault rifles to the plant named after. Degtyareva laughing
  9. Holoy
    Holoy 3 November 2016 12: 32
    +1
    Why Rosguard drones? Buggy, now UAVs .... I won’t be surprised if tomorrow they need MLRS Tornado ...
  10. gaudin
    gaudin 3 November 2016 12: 45
    +2
    Quote: iConst
    There are also algorithms for recognizing hacking attempts - the control channel is cut off and the device goes to the base by an inertial orientation system or by a map of the area, which the device itself removed during the flight.

    I cut the electronic warfare and the drones themselves scattered to their bases, you don’t even need to shoot down.
  11. Hapfri
    Hapfri 3 November 2016 12: 51
    0
    Yesterday, by the way, there was infa that Russia developed a weapon destroying any type of drones. That is, we can them, but they do not exist))))
  12. Alex_Tug
    Alex_Tug 3 November 2016 21: 14
    0
    I suggest hacking my washer so that I can look for my socks and wash without my knowledge.
  13. Alex_Tug
    Alex_Tug 3 November 2016 21: 17
    0
    Quote: Hupfri
    Yesterday, by the way, there was infa that Russia developed a weapon destroying any type of drones. That is, we can them, but they do not exist))))

    I learned to write at 5 years old. But the thermonuclear reactor has not yet been built.
  14. Bijo
    Bijo 3 November 2016 22: 28
    +1
    "Kalashnikov" already engaged in drones? Have you set the picatinny bar on "unbreakable"? They would go about their business normally - small arms. And then soon they will begin to build nuclear submarines for the "Russian Guard".