The Anglo-Transvaal War in Photos and Pictures

35
"For the empire of all empires,
For the card that grows in breadth. "
(Rudyard Kipling "By birth")


Last time with illustrations from Niva magazine for 1899 - 1900. story The Anglo-Transvaal War is not over, because it continued in 1901 and 1902. However, the number of photos in the magazine for 1901 of the year has decreased significantly. However, the war itself took a different character. After the surrender of the army of Cronje, the Boers were demoralized. Their commandos just went home. And while they were undergoing rehabilitation there, the British managed to occupy most of their country, and they had to switch to guerrilla tactics.




Horse attack Boers. Fig. from the magazine "Niva". Another favorite drawing from my childhood, redrawn many times depending on need. Louis Bousenenar, who described the first attack of the Molokosos, did not sin against the truth: the Boers and foreign volunteers, as a rule, had neither a peak nor a sabers, and therefore attacked the British, firing at them with rifles at full gallop.

All "progressive humanity", in modern terms, condemned the British, but there was little sense from this condemnation. "Coal stations" around the world, the impregnable fortress of Gibraltar, the Suez Canal, controlled by the British, the armada of armadillos - all this made England invulnerable to criticism, as the elephant does not notice the pellets.

The Anglo-Transvaal War in Photos and Pictures

The Boer War led to the use of many new weapons and, in particular, not only the Maxim machine guns, but also 37-mm automatic cannons designed by Hiram Maxim. However, not only war. From the magazine "Niva" I once learned that the electric kettle, for example, went on sale in 1901 year, and a household vacuum cleaner ... in 1908 year, and not somewhere in England, but here in Russia .


But this is a Maxim gun with a broken cooling jacket. Such damage to this system was fatal. The water flowed, the barrel overheated, and shooting became impossible.

At the same time, Lieutenant Yedrikhin, who was in South Africa as a correspondent for the newspaper Novoye Vremya (and, apparently, also an agent of the Russian military intelligence), and wrote to the newspapers under the pseudonym Vandam, had already warned the Russians: Anglo-Saxon is the enemy, but God forbid, to have his friend ... The main enemy of the Anglo-Saxons on the path to world domination is the Russian people. ” But pay attention to what he wrote about “world domination,” that is, he believed that Russia was completely worth it!


But the artillery of large calibers in this war used the old, model 1877 of the year. The guns had no recoil attachments and behind them were put metal “slides”, which were retard brakes. Naturally, such weapons could not develop high rates of fire. However, Louis Bussenar also wrote about this, the destructive power of such guns was immense, as their shells were stuffed with picric acid. For the French, explosives based on it were called melinitis, among the English they were ledidite. Since it was also a good dye (!), The smoke at their break was green!

Nevertheless, the powerful informational support of the Boers in the newspapers of the whole world aroused mass sympathies for the Boers, and a flood of volunteer volunteers literally poured into their army literally from everywhere. It is clear that most of the volunteers consisted of the Dutch (about 650 people), the French, who traditionally did not like the British (400), the Germans, who did not like them almost more (550), the Americans (300), the Italians (200), “hot the Swedish guys ”(150), the Irish people who hated England at all (200), and the Russians, who had“ the ashes of burned justice ”(about 225) pounded in their hearts.


The Dutch detachment of volunteers under the command of Colonel Maximov 1 of October 1900 of the year, which later became the first and last "Russian Boer general". So volunteering is an old tradition.

It is clear that in general it was a little, but among the volunteers there were many talented officers, artillery specialists, doctors, that is, this international support for the Boers was very valuable. Another thing is that, as Louis Bussenar rightly wrote in his novel “Captain Sorvi-golov,” the attitude towards them from the side of the Boers was simply disgusting. Of course, even if it were different, the Boers would still have lost, since with England they could not bear the force. But the price of victory for the British would be much higher!


In 1900, the British began for the first time in the history of wars to use armored steam carriers to transport troops to the depths of the country. 5-mm steel-nickel armor protected them from dull Mauser bullets at all distances of fire. The presence of the gun, towed from behind, made it possible to repel the attack of large cavalry units, so that the losses of the British during the movement around the country dropped sharply.


Steam tractors of such conveyors had large rear wheels with developed lugs, so their permeability was very high.

It should be noted that it was on the fields of the Transvaal that many types of modern weapons were tested - lidittovye projectiles and machine guns "maxim", new khaki uniforms, and massively used armored trains, civilian concentration camps and much more, which later was most actively used in the years of the First World War.


Interestingly, in South Africa, the British did not only use their “maxims”, but also tried out the American Browning machine guns, nicknamed “potato digging machine”. The British did not like them, but the Americans themselves adopted them and delivered them to Russia in 1914 - 1917. In the years of the civil war in Russia, this machine gun was the second in mass.

The Boers themselves, after their defeat, resisted for another year. But the British moved to a new tactic. The whole country was divided into squares separated by barbed wire, the passages between the barriers which were controlled by armored trains and the system of warehouses with powerful searchlights and telegraph communication.


"Boers are trying to cross the line of wire barriers at the warehouse." Fig. from the magazine "Niva".


Surprisingly, judging by this text, the searchlight at that time was called ... "porthole"!

They hung jars of jam on the wire, patrols walked with the dogs, so it was difficult to break through them. It was enough to attack one warehouse, as an armored train immediately departed to its aid, suppressing the Boers with fire. Of course, there was still a desert, where there was no wire and warehouses, however, it was impossible to live there either, because there was no water, no food. The population, driven into the camps, also could not help the Buram-partisans.


Again, the Boers launched on a variety of tricks to break through the barbed wire of the British, for which they sent herds of mad buffaloes. By the way, this phrase is found in the magazine “Niva” and ... then literally migrated to the novel by A. Tolstoy “Aelita”, where the Atlanteans are fighting in the same way with Asians. But ... neither in the novel, nor in real life did the poor buffaloes help the enemy!


The victory of the Boers at Twi-Fontaine. Yes, the Boers defeated the British and beyond. But for each victory they eventually had two losses.

Finally, 31 in May, 1902, the Boers, who were extremely and not without reason fearing for the lives of their wives and children, were forced to surrender. As a result, the Transvaal Republic and the Orange Republic were annexed by Britain.


So, by ropes, the English often had to “blind” their locomotives. Broneparovoz under the name Shaggy Mary, 1902

But it should also be noted that with their courage and stubborn resistance, and also to a certain extent, and thanks to the sympathies of the entire world community, the Boers rather “got off easily”. They managed to bargain all participants in the war for an amnesty and secured the right to self-government. The Dutch language was allowed for use in public institutions and in court, it was also allowed to study in schools. Moreover, the British even paid the boers compensation for their destroyed farms and houses, so that some of them even became rich in this, because it was not always possible to check what their burned out buildings were and what the total area of ​​the destroyed buildings was. But the most important thing is that the British, the ardent opponents of slavery, allowed the Boers to continue exploiting and destroying the black people of Africa, which formed the basis of the future policy of apartheid.


But what Niva magazine wrote about the start of the Boer’s negotiations with the British. The ombudsmen then dispersed to discussing the question of peace in the Boer commando, and Kitchener promised not to impede the boers in this.


Boers are discussing the issue of peace. Fig. from the magazine "Niva".

It should be noted that the British during the war stained themselves with a lot of completely frank crimes, which were all the more conspicuous to their contemporaries, because before that, nothing of the kind had happened during wars. The shooting of the Boer General Scheepers, who was captured on the farm, seemed particularly outrageous. He was convicted of a trial that accused him of killing civilians through train derailment and cruel treatment of prisoners by the British. Naturally, he was found guilty and shot. The news of this outraged the whole world and it came to the point that one of the American congressmen proposed that the US Secretary of State protested to the British government over the execution of the Boer officer. The protest was declared, however, nothing, of course, did not change it. But it is clear that the mistrust and ill will of the Russians towards the British have very long roots.


General Scheepers. Fig. from the magazine "Niva".
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    7 November 2016 06: 39
    Yes, there were a lot of "innovations" introduced in that war.
    From khaki uniforms to concentration camps ...
    1. +2
      7 November 2016 07: 45
      Quote: Moore
      Yes, there were a lot of "innovations" introduced in that war.

      In part, war is the engine of progress.
      1. 0
        16 December 2016 12: 01
        Rather, an "exhibition".
  2. +6
    7 November 2016 07: 38
    By the way, in this war, not all technical innovations paid off. For example, a telegraph was used for communication between warehouses. And sometimes a field telephone. The Boers quickly found wires and cut them off (the wires were bright blue, for the convenience of signalmen). Therefore, the British used the old good heliograph .a signal flares at night. Incidentally, with the help of rockets, the Boers often ambushed English patrols
    1. +3
      7 November 2016 07: 58
      Kipling has a funny poem about the heliograph - the Code of Ethics.
  3. +5
    7 November 2016 08: 07
    Some of the colonialists fought with others ... But the indigenous population and the population did not count ..
    1. +4
      7 November 2016 15: 30
      The most striking thing is that the Boers racists are the natives of South Africa.
      They appeared (sailed) there before the tribes of the Bantu group (hence the word "bantustan"):
      scythe, sutu, zulu, who came 200 years later from the north, simultaneously destroying other tribes.
      Before the Bantu tribes, pygmies lived in these places. The Boers did not destroy them, but simply by accident.
      infected with European viruses and microbes, and those in the majority died out.
      When the Bantu came, the Boer-Zulu wars began. Zulus - a tribe professionally
      engaged in robbery and racketeering. Fearless warriors. They held other bantu
      in a black body. The wars ended in a draw. The territory was divided.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +1
          7 November 2016 17: 34
          Respond, old bore, you got it already with your love tongue .
          1. +1
            7 November 2016 19: 24
            Alexey, and if in essence, then Parsec has buried you. lol
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Respond, old bore, you got it already with your love tongue .

            There is such an anecdote: feel
            Pinocchio.
            - Malvina, I love you!
            Malvina.
            - Pinocchio, get away, from your love I’m all in splinters!
            1. +2
              7 November 2016 19: 52
              I can not agree.
              He draws knowledge from Wiki (a good source, but boring).
              And I lived in South Africa (in Johannesburg) for a year on a business trip and talked with many
              intelligent people. Not by the Boers, though, but by the British and Jews.
              Although my boss was just a drill, very nice.
              The city knew decently, and was in the province of Natal, and saw the Zulus, Khos, and Bushmen
              not in the pictures. And even talked with some about trifles.
              There are different versions of the north-south Bantu track and the deaths of other tribes.
              Dear peach just gets me all over the site, stuck like a bath sheet.
              So I snapped, alas. am
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        7 November 2016 23: 29
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Before the Bantu tribes, pygmies lived in these places.

        Found a Boer proverb: "Never try to find out who your ancestors were, otherwise you will quickly fall into the descendants of the Hottentots."
        It turns out that not the Pygmies, but the Hottentots and Bushmen are the peoples of the Khoisan race, see above 20-30 above the Pygmies smile
        The first commandant of Fort Kapstad (Cape Town) in 1651 was the Dutchman Jan van Riebeck.
        He concluded the first treaty with the Hottentots, and in 1659 the first Hottentot-Boer War began.
        1. 0
          8 November 2016 03: 43
          Yes, I made a mistake with the pygmies. Bushmen. In the accounting department of a large company where I worked,
          Deputy Chief Accountant (Italian) was a Bushman. Very short, with a big head.
          Apparently, they are very smart. Despite the open racism that there was (and is) in the office there were a lot of them and Indians.
  4. +2
    7 November 2016 08: 44
    "God fights on the side which, other things being equal, has more troops."
    This phrase is attributed to Napoleon 1. Yes, and the industrial power of GB did not leave the Boers a chance to succeed in their unequal struggle.
    1. 0
      7 November 2016 11: 05
      Then it means that God was against the Communists and the USSR. I did not forgive them for the explosions of their temples.
      1. 0
        7 November 2016 12: 32
        Quote: kalibr
        Then it means that God was against the Communists and the USSR. I did not forgive them for the explosions of their temples.

        Not only Orthodox churches were blown up, but also synagogues with mosques. Do you think this means Yahweh, Allah and our triune united with the Anglo-American financial mafia in defeating the USSR?
        1. 0
          7 November 2016 14: 39
          If there are many gods, then "yes", if one, then also "yes". You said yourself that God is on the side of those who win.
          1. +1
            7 November 2016 18: 10
            Quote: kalibr
            You yourself said that God is on the side of those who win.

            Dear, look carefully at my comment, the source of information is indicated there.
            Quote: kalibr
            ..if one, then also "yes"

            The participants in the Battle of Gettysburg believed in the same God, you can ask Google: on whose side was the Protestant goddess ...
        2. +1
          7 November 2016 17: 15
          Yahweh, Allah and our triune

          You should be familiar with the history of religions.
          I do not want to offend anyone's religious beliefs, but Allah and our triune (Jehovah) are just not even names, but transcriptions of the same name of the god (well, or God) of the Jewish Yahweh.
          1. 0
            7 November 2016 18: 43
            Quote: combat192
            You should be familiar with the history of religions.

            Quote: V.ic
            Yahweh, Allah and our triune

            Dear, the sequence of naming the deities by me should have led you to the idea that I got acquainted with history in small and small ways.
            Quote: combat192
            but Allah and our triune (Jehovah)

            In no case can Allah be merciful and merciful be likened to the more ancient Yahweh, and even for likening Jehovah to the Christian God, orthodox Jews will take out a drop of your blood!
            Quote: combat192
            it’s not just names, but transcriptions of the same name of God

            Indeed?
            http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ushakov/1056954
            TRANSCRIPTION = (1) image (letters) of other written characters or (2) image (speech sounds, musical sounds) by writing means.
            We omit the first and useless and look at the second.
            Draw all three names with the same symbols. Letters must match phonemes. I admit permutations of letters and changing the order of reading letters. We are waiting! I wish you success in your difficult and useless work! hi / I didn’t pull you by the tongue; you yourself wanted to rise above the ordinary ...
            1. +1
              7 November 2016 18: 54
              Still, combat192 is right, in my opinion.
              In Hebrew / Aramite, "el" is god and the Arabic "alla" is from the same root.
              Christians have God-creator ("father" of Jesus) - he is "el" or "alla".
              So what about the Creator, the three religions have no differences.
              But Christians consider Jesus to be God, and Jews and Muslims are one of the prophets.
              Among Muslims, Mohammed is a great prophet, not God. Like Moses among the Jews.
              1. 0
                7 November 2016 19: 30
                Quote: voyaka uh
                So what about the Creator, the three religions have no differences.

                Where can you "dance" except from the five books? Yes
                Quote: voyaka uh
                Still, combat192 is right, in my opinion.

                You have the right to your point of view, only I'm like that, not good, I asked my opponent to write transcriptions / TRANSCRIPTIONS, SIR / so that Yahweh / Yahweh / Jehovah was voiced / it was SOUND / according to the transcription and these sounds corresponded to Allah / Allah, and also God (overlay), because you have to answer and your own words ... He himself wrote the magic word "TRANSCRIPTION".
  5. +7
    7 November 2016 09: 51
    a little out of topic. In the Anglo-Boer War, the Maxim machine gun was first used (at least massively). "From the great to the ridiculous one step." Maxim invented not only the first machine gun, but also ... a mousetrap, the same one with a spring, which many of us put in the country to catch mice! (however, he invented many more interesting things, and even sued Edison over a light bulb). Here you can also draw an analogy with the designer Makarov, who, in addition to a pistol and other weapons, invented a machine for rolling cans of canned food, as well as a clamp - press the lid to the can.
    Dear author, another thank you for the "corner of peace"! Good day, everyone, and a good week!
    1. +5
      7 November 2016 11: 08
      Thanks! It will be a good week indeed. I have already written five articles on VO, I have done everything for work at the University. And tomorrow I'm going to a friend's photo session of very interesting types of weapons. So wait for a return to the "shooter". And then to the archive. There is a lot of work.
      1. +2
        7 November 2016 11: 14
        we wait! This is how you go to the site every morning, and you don't know what you will see - either a castle, or armor, or a little-studied tank, or the Niva magazine. good Good luck to you!
        1. +1
          7 November 2016 14: 42
          That's the beauty of online journalism. I can't write only about one thing - it gets boring. I only write according to my mood. I choose which topic is closer to me right now, climb into the archive, look at what is there and write. If "rushing", then 40 minutes and you're done. Sometimes the topic is thought over for 2-3 days, or even 2-3 months. Or everything is there, but not the mood. Or ... there is a mood - the archive is under repair. This is the worst part.
  6. +3
    7 November 2016 11: 06
    Now there the blacks have shown themselves in all their glory. The Boers in that war captured one British officer, but he escaped, having missed the pampas and still returned to his own, his name was Winston Churchill
    1. +4
      7 November 2016 13: 15
      In fact, escape from captivity in all countries, including Russia,
      considered a feat. And Churchill did it. He, incidentally, is directly
      participated in 4 wars and was considered the bravest cavalryman.
  7. +3
    7 November 2016 12: 58
    The Boer War was well described by Arthur Conan Doyle. There is also his own analysis of the causes of this war. By the way, in addition to weapons novelties, an information war was also waged in this war, and sometimes the coverage of events there was one-sided and directed against the British. As they would say now, the British lost the information war.
  8. +2
    7 November 2016 13: 12
    "the French, who traditionally did not like the British (400)

    Here it is necessary to clarify. Some of the Boers were not of Dutch origin,
    and from Normandy (the north of France - former Scandinavian Vikings).
    Surnames De Villars, De Clerk - from there.
    And the Normans, of course, went to support their own.
  9. +4
    7 November 2016 13: 24
    "Another thing is that, as Louis Boussinard rightly wrote in his novel Captain Rip the Head,
    the attitude of the Boers towards them [the volunteers] was just disgusting. "

    Boers ("Afrikaners") are still famous for their extreme xenophobia. In their neighborhoods and towns
    no other whites live (there is nothing to say about colored people). "Non-Buram" declare a complete boycott,
    they don’t talk to them, they can smear the door with fuel oil or shit.
    Almost no mixed marriages, and if a woman decides to do this, then she needs to escape from the community.
    1. +1
      7 November 2016 13: 31
      what interesting details of the national "Boer" psychology! Thanks! I wonder if it is possible to clarify this phrase: "the attitude towards the volunteers was just disgusting." Unfortunately, I haven't read this novel. How was it expressed?
      1. +3
        7 November 2016 14: 45
        They were given the most difficult tasks, or ... they were not given tasks at all, they were used where the Boers were not sent. Weapons were given the worst (and not Mausers at all!), And did not listen to the advice of experienced officers. They didn’t listen at all!
        1. +3
          7 November 2016 14: 57
          some strange arrogance, multiplied by self-confidence .. Especially when voluntary helpers like that, from a pure heart go to shed blood for your country. Perhaps this national trait came about because of long isolation among Africans. Once again it says that you don’t have to climb indiscriminately with your love what
      2. +4
        7 November 2016 15: 00
        Quote: Mikado
        "The attitude towards the volunteers was just disgusting." Unfortunately, I haven't read this novel. How was it expressed?

        "the Boers used foreigners at every opportunity to
        performing the most difficult and dangerous operations. The most
        exhausting duties, they were entrusted with the most difficult cases, they consciously
        sacrificed and often sent to certain death without any benefit to the cause,
        rather, in order to save the lives of the Boers. "
        (C)
  10. +2
    7 November 2016 14: 57
    Volunteering has a long tradition ......... immediately the episodes from my favorite childhood book woke up in my head - Captain Tear off the head - it’s quite a bit there, but there is Russian participation too ....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"