Fighter trainings on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft-carrying cruiser (video)

The TV channel Zvezda published a video of the takeoff and landing of the Su-33 and MiG-29KUB fighters during training sessions on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrying cruiser.

The shooting was carried out from several angles - from the air, airplanes and cruiser decks.

The acceleration and take-off of the aircraft from the nasal springboard, as well as their landing with the aid of an aerofinisher, are sealed.

“It is worth noting that springboard taking off and landing on the deck are the most complex elements of the flight. With a huge overload in 8-9 units, the pilot must demonstrate jewelery accuracy in order to get into a small area between the arresting gear, "- comments the video Rossiyskaya Gazeta.



Help newspaper: “Su-33 (according to NATO codification - Flanker-D), is in service with the 1998 year. It is capable of speeds up to twice the speed of sound, and is intended for striking air, sea and land targets. It can carry guided missiles with self-guided heads, as well as unguided weapons. Firing is controlled by a system with electro-optical and radar sighting systems, as well as devices for objective monitoring and a single display.

The MiG-29KUB is a combat training version of the multipurpose MiG-29K fighter (according to the NATO codification - Fulcrum-D), belonging to the "4 ++" level. The aircraft is equipped with modern avionics, which has, in particular, an infrared direction finder for targets and the possibility of targeting air-to-air missiles by turning the head of the pilot. In addition, the MiG-29K is equipped with a new radar, which allows to detect targets and control the guidance of adjustable bombs at a distance of up to 200 kilometers. The fighter used elements of stealth technology. "

Comments

[Vladimir 38]

Beauties! Pride takes for our guys!

[figwam]

MIG-29KUB for the first time in a military campaign.

[Monos]

Here is a more complete one:

[cniza]

Thanks, really impressive. Successes.

[jjj]

I noticed that after taking off from the deck, our aircraft continue to take off at the heading. The Americans should immediately turn away from the ship

[lelikas]

It is more interesting to look at take-off at full load - how much they will sink after separation. Purely visual, MiGs accelerate weaker.

[ancient]

Quote: lelikas

It is more interesting to look at take-off at full load - how much they will sink after separation. Purely visual, MiGs accelerate weaker.

Not at all and .... what do you "mean by" .. full load?
If this is an option ... then the main thing is ... how to sit down. If the BC was not used for .. "purpose" here is far from an option .. "2 + 2"



According to Mig-29K ... it just seems so visually (because it’s less), but it has more thrust-weight ratio

[lelikas]

Quote: ancient

accelerate weaker.
Not at all and .... what do you "mean by" .. full load?

No tricks - just a complete refueling and the entire set of weapons.
Those Yankees, after separation from the catapult, sag.

[ancient]

Quote: lelikas

No tricks - just a complete refueling and the entire set of weapons.

Then forget or "take" these dreams to the section ... "Dreams" ... unfortunately

[figwam]

SU-33 take off on the brakes, did not even notice. 30th sec

[figwam]

Takeoff and landing MIG-29KUB

[activator]

Quote: jjj

I noticed that after taking off from the deck, our aircraft continue to take off at the heading. The Americans should immediately turn away from the ship

And what does it mean ? somebody knows

[activator]

By the way, the steamer drew attention and does not smoke. And then everyone pounced on a bucket .. a bucket ..

[Monos]

Quote: activator

And what does it mean ? somebody knows

Everything is simple. In the event of a fall, the pilot is more likely to escape and not fall under the bow if the plane immediately turns away. When taking off from a springboard, it is difficult to turn away because of the low speed. We have no catapults.

[activator]

Quote: Monos

Everything is simple. In the event of a fall, the pilot

Thanks for the clarification

[Sotskiy]

Quote: activator

Quote: jjj

I noticed that after taking off from the deck, our aircraft continue to take off at the heading. The Americans should immediately turn away from the ship

And what does it mean ? somebody knows

Once I read a comparative analysis of the American aircraft carrier with our "Kuzey". Without going into details, one of the conclusions is as follows: In connection with the design features of the ships, one plane takes off from our deck, from the American - three at the same time as ours. Isn't that why the Americans turn away from the course immediately after takeoff, so as not to interfere with the next one? And this despite the fact that the "Kuzya" is designed for 28 aircraft and 24 helicopters, and one American of the "Nimitz" type for 90 aircraft and helicopters. As a result of a hypothetical, direct confrontation between aircraft carriers, whose aviation will be the first to dominate the sky?
Someone will say that the comparison is not correct - sorry, we do not have other aircraft carriers equivalent to American ones.

[78bor1973]

I’m not reproaching our little child, but the American aircraft carrier is capable of two links in 30 minutes, and that’s purely practical, and when the kneading starts he will not be able to provide all the same two links in half an hour. This is the ceiling of modern aircraft carriers, you want to compare with please, the whole regiment can take off simultaneously from the ground airfield, and if there is a sudden attack of your floating airfield by large forces, I simply won’t envy the aircraft carrier!

[andrewkor]

And who is stronger: an elephant or a whale? Back ---- are these comparisons.

[ancient]

Quote: jjj

I noticed that after taking off from the deck, our aircraft continue to take off at the heading. The Americans should immediately turn away from the ship

Only "do not", but MAY and these are two huge differences
This is one of the advantages of a catapult takeoff .... no need to "balance on the brink of the 2nd mode" (ie stall)

[dmi.pris1]

The takeoff is on our course, and they are turned away .. The Americans take off much more often than from our "Kuznetsov" and we must quickly release the zone.

[ancient]

Quote: dmi.pris

The takeoff is on our course, and they are turned away .. The Americans take off much more often than from our "Kuznetsov" and we must quickly release the zone.

We do not immediately turn away (Zhukovsky's curves, that is, the boundaries of required and available thrust has not yet been "deceived" in the HISTORY of aviation.

Whom and what to liberate .. what zones ... if different types take off, they take off from different positions, if there is a conveyor belt, then we have less time to take off the next one, because. no need to "mount on grippers".
If of course you use the 4th position, then yes ... Amer will naturally release more aircraft.

And he turns away immediately. Because he CAN, because. "sits on the wing", and not on the "engine" ... unfortunately, plus do not forget about Kuznetsov's "speed" ... the tea is no longer young .. what would "run .. as it should" :

[jjj]

Quote: ancient

turns away immediately. because that CAN, because. "sits on the wing", not on the "engine" ...

Somehow a slightly different explanation was voiced. The Americans fear that in case of an unsuccessful takeoff, the plane may be under the stem "bulb", and by turning it away, the pilot gets a chance to escape from the water. And at the start of the Americans, the pilot has no right to keep his hands on the control levers of the aircraft. He holds on to the special handles at the top of the inside of the cockpit so that it can be seen by the release on the deck. And the pilot takes control after the separation.
By the way, we have missile shafts below deck.

[ancient]

We have exactly the same, because before take-off, you set with the trimmer the NECESSARY angle of deviation by the stabilizer, then put the ORE up to the stop and threw the RUS, because. during the take-off run (if you watch a movie, what we have, what about the Amers, it’s shaking .... mom don’t cry) well and how during the take-off run you will thrust the ORE to a dive
Therefore, after checking the control and installing the given ANGLE of stabilizers, the hand is removed from the RUS, and not so that someone would see something
And what does the "missile mines" have to do with Kuznetsovo? : Helps .. during takeoff

[NEXUS]

Quote: ancient

And he turns away immediately. Because he CAN, because. "sits on the wing", and not on the "engine" ... unfortunately, plus do not forget about Kuznetsov's "speed" ... the tea is no longer young .. what would "run .. as it should"

Greetings, ancient grumbler!
That's right, he doesn't run, maybe it's really not our young Kuzya. But I think the most interesting thing will begin when our falcons from Kuzi begin to "comb" the Basmachi. So let's see what our air wing is good for.
At the same time, as I understand it, the new arsenal will probably be run in the form of contactless bombs, etc. ... there are rumors that Hermes Kuzya also carries the missile to the coast of Syria.

[ancient]

Quote: NEXUS

That's right, he doesn't run, maybe it's really not our young Kuzya. But I think the most interesting thing will begin when our falcons from Kuzi begin to "comb" the Basmachi. So let's see what our air wing is good for.

Quote: NEXUS

That's right, he doesn't run, maybe it's really not our young Kuzya. But I think the most interesting thing will begin when our falcons from Kuzi begin to "comb" the Basmachi. So let's see what our air wing is good for.

Hi Andrew!
"Combing the basmachi" is called ... "pulling SOMETHING on ... the globe"
Remember the tasks for which "Kuznetsov" was created .... so you don't need to make of it what it is for ... not intended
Well, about Hermes, this is from the series ... "The 9th plane is already on trials" and so on

[NEXUS]

Quote: ancient

"Combing the basmachi" is called ... "pulling SOMETHING on ... the globe"

Well, it’s yes, yes, there’s only an alternative, we don’t have much in the form of 11 aircraft carriers, friend. So you have to cross a muskrat with a malicious one ... but all the same, in defense of Kuzi, I’ll say it’s better to stand guard the corn near the wall.

Quote: ancient

Well, about Hermes, this is from the series ... "The 9th plane is already on tests" and so on

Do not sprinkle sugar on my sugar on the 9th plane. You yourself know that this is a sore point for me. Evil is not enough. But with Hermes, I think you got excited, friend.

[Rus2012]

Quote: cniza

Success.

and meanwhile - a more epoch-making event happened!
Here -

Nov 1, 2016
For the first time after the 80's, Academician Yu.S. Solomonov carried out successful launch of the Barguzin rocket, this is the so-called "wandering start." The Barguzin combat railway missile system is a promising mobile missile system for strategic missile forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

http://moment-istini.com/37958/vpervye-posle-80-h
-godov-akademik-yu-s-solomonov-osushhestvil-udach
nyj-zapusk-rakety-barguzin /

Initiates say -

event is not a fake ....
at least the promised "wandering start" (in the sense of a throw start) of the Barguzin ...

[Monos]

Meanwhile, our squadron is already passing Crete. Tartus is about 1000 km away.

[lelikas]

There, the Hindu was inserted to the heap.

[albert]

At the beginning of the video, for some reason, takeoffs from the "Admiral Gorshkov" sold to India are shown.

[ism_ek]

Extended video - fake. Part of it was filmed at all on "Admiral Gorshkov"

[siberalt]

Training is a good thing, but even better in combat. The "humanitarian abstinence" will end, the guys will work really.

[INVESTOR]

What do you say, cool !!

[Giant thought]

Let them train hard so that all the processes during take-off / landing are worked out to automatism, so that in a combat situation everyone works as a single mechanism.

[Krabik]

For normal training, you need to have 2 aircraft carriers, one for repair, the other on the campaign.

And we are going to repair most of the time and pilots on a string and a rope are training ...

[Sagittarius]

And now, our pilots are doing fine. Good luck to everyone, and so that the number of takeoffs equals the number of landings for everyone.

[Knight Rider]

The beauty! And when will they come to the coast of Syria? The numbers of the fifth?

[lis-ik]

Quote: Giant thought

Let them train hard so that all the processes during take-off / landing are worked out to automatism, so that in a combat situation everyone works as a single mechanism.

Yours sincerely, the Politician.

[Giant thought]

Thanks for the subtle irony.

[lis-ik]

Catch plus the Giant for self-irony.

[Inhabitant of Mordor]

Impressive! Beauties!
I just watched the video in the morning I thought that we lost in the nineties. After all, there really were 3 groups and larger ones to assemble. A nightmare how to gouge the Army and Navy in those days ...

[voyaka uh]

"With a colossal overload of 8-9 units, the pilot must demonstrate
jewelery accuracy to get into a small area between the aerofinishers "," ///

I must say that American pilots do this every day on their 10 aircraft carriers.
Although the skill of Russian pilots is not detracting.

[lis-ik]

Honestly, I watched the video several times, then the extended version, and when only ours got such skill, especially on the MiGs.

[voyaka uh]

There was an article about how they trained on the ground simulator.

[Temples]

Yes, us army, what the Americans do there.
It is you who pray to them.
And we think about our own.

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: voyaka uh

Although the skill of Russian pilots is not detracting.

The eagles learn to fly. Although each of our deck pilots is a high-level specialist, but working in the NATO Aspen Nest is a moment of truth and the best qualification exam, which the guys have not had for a long time.
The tense military-political situation in the region by itself implies something more than practical study or storming of militants in the desert ... And here Suvorov's principle of "beat, not count" is already triggered. Let America have at least 10 aircraft carriers in a cube ( at the same time in the sea, and besides, in a certain region there are still significantly less than 10 platforms) --- this never landed our eagles and did not pressure us when making decisions. I just stood up in the Mediterranean Sea in a battle order and watched, reflecting provocations NATO ... As a result of these "stands," the leaders of the United States and the USSR then mirrored in some Helsinki how to relieve tension in the world and outlined the boundaries of interests. I think that Putin is striving for this. like Leonid Ilyich ...)))

[Vladimir]

Impressive skill pilots, well done.

[Banishing liberoids]

And still, the fleet needs aircraft carriers — that’s for situations like this with Syria.

[UVB]

With a tremendous overload of 8-9 units, the pilot must demonstrate jewelry accuracy in order to get into a small area between the aerofinishers ”,

Sometimes the comments of correspondents amaze with their stupidity. Overloads occur just after the hook on the aerofinisher cable, and not vice versa.

[Temples]

And from this fact that landing is getting easier?
Or without a fly in the ointment does not live?

[ancient]

Quote: Temples

And from this fact that landing is getting easier?
Or without a fly in the ointment does not live?

And why are you so .. got mad ..... after all, the remark in all respects is very true ... And then how to equate "specials from the media" to the military .. come on .... but how to cover military topics, then. ... it would be better if they sawed wood ... there would be more sense

[evge-malyshev]

Quote: ancient

it would be better to saw firewood.

I think that they would also begin to teach cutting wood. Not imagining what it is.

[Temples]

Ancient, you tell your woman that she was enraged.
Once again, especially for you, I will repeat my comment
here it is:

Overloads occur just after the hook on the aerofinisher cable, and not vice versa.

And from this fact that landing is getting easier?
Or without a fly in the ointment does not live?

Can you tell me why, after this clarification, the journalist landing on the deck becomes a trifle ???

[ancient]

[quote = Temples] Ancient, you tell your woman that she was enraged.
Once again, especially for you, I will repeat my comment
/ Quote]

Firstly, we didn’t drink at brotherhood, so .. "keep .. the distance and interval"
and secondly, do not advise me what to do and to whom and what to say, and I will not tell you ... "WHAT you need to go for" ... agreed

[Koshak]

Quote: Temples

And from this fact that landing is getting easier?
Or without a fly in the ointment does not live?

Yes, he said everything correctly. If the author made a mistake, then what does "tar" have to do with it?

[UnclePasha]

No need to listen to them) just to give them "Sensation")

[Orionvit]

And here is the "sensation"? Phrase

With a huge overload of 8-9 units, the pilot must demonstrate jewelry accuracy in order to get into a small area between aerofinishers

so immediately striking is its absurdity that before writing about this, I decided to check if I was the only one. It turned out no, not one. But moralists with their "fly in the ointment" immediately swooped down on what seems to be a correct remark of the UVB.

[ioann1]

Wow! Well done boys!!!

[Dr. Sorge]

Save the heavens of these professionals!

[vfqjh]

Beauties! The spirit captures and pride overflows the heart. Good luck guys! Let the number of takeoffs coincide with the number of landings !!!

[Vlad5307]

Training takes place not only during the day but also at night, apparently, too - it's good, they study in full. Success in applying the skill to pacify the Phashington-Saudi rabble. And what kind of fireworks flashed there in frames?

[masiya]

Everything is fine, but our pilots continued to study painfully for a long time on an aircraft carrier ... and on different types of aircraft, the Americans somehow managed to grow thousands of pilots of aircraft landing and taking off from aircraft carriers, and we have some kind of brakes, because our pilots are far worse , and brains for sure - better, what's the matter ... ???

[St Petrov]

all of a sudden the thing is that we have fewer aircraft carriers and corresponding o_O aircraft

[Oleg Vyacheslavovich]

With all the kubrick we do so-

[NordUral]

Good luck, guys! Take off, strike, victory, landing! Train, so that overseas vultures and thoughts do not have to fight with us.

[Zibelew]

But on Kuznetsovo there are more fighters than some countries have. Let our carrier-based aviation practice.

[lis-ik]

Quote: masiya

Everything is fine, but our pilots continued to study painfully for a long time on an aircraft carrier ... and on different types of aircraft, the Americans somehow managed to grow thousands of pilots of aircraft landing and taking off from aircraft carriers, and we have some kind of brakes, because our pilots are far worse , and brains for sure - better, what's the matter ... ???

The thing is probably that we do not have aircraft carriers; you must agree that it is difficult to raise thousands of pilots for non-existing weapons.

[Holoy]

Only the MiG-29KUB in the correct color is painted! And that the Su-33 is not repainted?

[evge-malyshev]

Quote: Holoy

Only the MiG-29KUB in the correct color is painted! And that the Su-33 is not repainted?

Different units - different colors.

[svp67]

Quote: evge-malyshev

Different units - different colors.

And the attack aircraft then the Su-25UTG were one with the Su-33 color

[svp67]

Quote: Holoy

Only the MiG-29KUB in the correct color is painted! And that the Su-33 is not repainted?

Or maybe the other way around? No one has set the "correct" color.

[Holoy]

Somewhere already saw Old about black for the Air Force from the Navy ...

[UI-Spb]

My two-year-old daughter watched the video three times in a row - just delighted))

[vovanpain]

Quote: UI-Spb

My two-year-old daughter watched the video three times in a row - just delighted))

A colleague, my four-year-old granddaughter looked and gasped: “This is daaaaaaaa! We have the right children.

[Altona]

Well done, hell! The guys work! Beauties!

[Mountain shooter]

They took off, of course, without a load, but this is understandable - to land with a combat load of 8 tons - this is the same and the chassis can be broken. There is something to be proud of. Our "Kuzya" is almost in no way inferior to the aircraft carriers of a potential enemy, the only thing is the number of sides. BUT! If you count, FOR WHAT TIME can the Kuzya or Nimitz strike force be raised? Well, ours, it is quite possible, will give a head start, with its own springboard.

[ism_ek]

Nimets raises planes faster.
To begin with, there are four catapults.
At full combat load, planes from Kuznetsov take off from third position
This significantly slows the takeoff of a group of aircraft.

[Holoy]

The strength of the aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov is that he can safely carry the enemy’s Granit rocket launcher ... along with the Air Force ... that’s why they are afraid of him, he is self-sufficient!

[ghby]

Quote: Holoy

The strength of the aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov is that he can safely carry the enemy’s Granit rocket launcher ... along with the Air Force ... that’s why they are afraid of him, he is self-sufficient!

somewhere the cassette lies with similar firing; all hands digitize do not reach. And so it’s beautiful from memory - the plane leaves the mine and the rocket goes.

[ism_ek]

The mines with "granites" were flooded with fuel oil in the late 90s.

[magician]

but actually a handsome man, albeit a grandfather.))) this is probably our answer to aircraft carriers, power and pride!

[Holoy]

For Cruiser, the age is normal ...

[Knight Rider]

Quote: wizard

but actually a handsome man, albeit a grandfather.))) this is probably our answer to aircraft carriers, power and pride!

This "grandfather" is younger than most of us sitting here)))

[DimanC]

Finally, a video appeared with the MiG landing on the deck. And then somehow since the time of the first landing, it has already been some years ... but only Su-shki flew

[sgr291158]

Feels the power.

[Lucy]

ancient

...... if there is a conveyor belt, then we have less time to take off the next one, because. no need to "mount on grippers".
If of course you use the 4th position, then yes ... Amer will naturally release more planes .....

And what are the take-off intervals of the 3rd detachment for the Su-33?
Until recently, there was only a theory with gr. Sov. sec., for these (Su-33) BelAZs on a two-lane road! They didn’t wonder why, or when more squadrons (including Su-25utg) were not planted on Kuznetsov if there were more airborne aircraft and years. / S.

....... unfortunately, plus do not forget about Kuznetsov's "speed" ... the tea is no longer young .. so that "run .. as it should" [/ Quote]

Unfortunately, there have been cases (s) of aircraft taking off from an anchored young Kuznetsov

[Lucy]

Quote: voyaka uh

"With a colossal overload of 8-9 units, the pilot must demonstrate
jewelery accuracy to get into a small area between the aerofinishers "," ///

I must say that American pilots do this every day on their 10 aircraft carriers.
Although the skill of Russian pilots is not detracting.

With Nx at 8 pts. you need to put a plate in front of your eyes so that the eyeballs do not fall out on the ILS, and Ny in the Su-33 has 7 units.

[AlexanderVP]

It seems that it is time to close the dispute: "Does Russia need aircraft carriers?" As the current world situation shows, they are needed.