Military Review

China has developed a comprehensive coastal defense system.

18
The company Poly Technologies (PRC) has created a comprehensive coastal defense system, which includes coastal PKRC, weapon Air defense, as well as various command and control equipment, reports Military Parity.


China has developed a comprehensive coastal defense system.
Launch of Chinese anti-ship missile YJ-62A

“The equipment may include radar, satellites, aircraft, optoelectronic systems and Drones, which supply firepower with information in real time. Air defense consists of 35 mm towed ZAU, portable FN-16 air defense systems and mobile FB-6A air defense systems (8 missiles ready for launch). The LY-60D, LY-80 and FD-2000 air defense systems with a firing range from 15 to 125 km can be integrated into the system. - says the publication.

The anti-ship capabilities of the system are provided by C-602 missiles (export version of the Yingji-62 anti-ship missile - “Attacking Eagle”) with a firing range of up to 280 km (to equip the PLA with missiles with a range from 40 to 400 km).

The C-802 CRP version has a firing range from 15 to km 120.
Photos used:
english.peopledaily.com.cn
18 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. McLuha-MacLeod
    McLuha-MacLeod 2 November 2016 13: 51
    +3
    Well done Chinese, they really need coastal defense and we are not threatened
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 2 November 2016 14: 09
      +3
      The Chinese are strengthening their coastal defense in the light of the aggressive statements of some American admirals and generals, you see, the Yankees' fighting fervor will decrease.
      1. DMB_95
        DMB_95 2 November 2016 14: 37
        +2
        The Yankees would not have pushed their way into China, but "you can't spoil porridge with meat." At the current level, between the PRC and the United States, theoretically, only a local maritime conflict is possible (for the islands, for example). Now the United States can count on victory over China either at sea or with a nuclear strike. If you have the courage.
  2. Joker787
    Joker787 2 November 2016 13: 54
    +2
    Well done, I wonder who whistled? Range of 400 km, in general, are no longer toys.

    Although here is from the wiki tth:
    The YJ-62A missile repeats the layout of the X-55 and Tomahawk.
    The mass of the engine is about 200 kg, the thrust is 510 kgf. In the ship and land versions, a solid-fuel starting engine is installed on the rocket.
    Starting weight: 1350 kg
    Warhead Weight: 300 kg
    The length of the rocket with a launch booster: 7000 mm
    Case diameter: 540 mm
    Wingspan: 2900 mm
    Firing Range: 400 km (280 km for export modification)
    Flight speed: M = 0,9
    Flight height:
    Above ground - 30 m
    Over the sea - 10 m
    At the goal - 7 m [1]
    Guidance system: ANNS integrated with ARGSN, radio altimeter and GPS / Beidou
    ARGSN target detection range: 40 km
    Interference immunity: achieved by frequency hopping

    Nothing special.
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 2 November 2016 13: 55
      0
      Well, you ask questions laughing
    2. Alex 2016
      Alex 2016 2 November 2016 13: 56
      +5
      Who is whistling? All have a little bit. As always. And of course well done.
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 2 November 2016 14: 07
      +1
      Quote: Joker787
      Well done, I wonder who whistled?

      They did not whistle, but they took it to vilify. wink One feels Russian participation. By the way, what is this photo of a tractor? Not MAZ case?
      1. PSih2097
        PSih2097 2 November 2016 14: 15
        +2
        Quote: NEXUS
        Not MAZ case?

        no, local copy ...
        1. askort154
          askort154 2 November 2016 15: 00
          +1
          PSih2097 ........... not, local copy ..

          And to the left is clearly not a Chinese.
          1. cap
            cap 2 November 2016 15: 18
            +2
            Quote: askort154
            PSih2097 ........... not, local copy ..

            And to the left is clearly not a Chinese.


            How not a Chinese?
            Known to everyone by Li Si Tsyn laughing
  3. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 2 November 2016 14: 00
    +2
    The Chinese should have secured their coastal zone in the first place, and now it is necessary to create a single integrated coastal defense system, with a single command center, with minefields in especially dangerous areas. Although they know better.
    1. Sagittarius
      Sagittarius 2 November 2016 14: 51
      +2
      The main thing for the Chinese in this complex is that they can safely get to Taiwan.
  4. demiurg
    demiurg 2 November 2016 15: 10
    +1
    Does it make sense to tie anti-aircraft defense to RCC? You can do with the given forces.
  5. Franciscan
    Franciscan 2 November 2016 15: 18
    0
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: Joker787
    Well done, I wonder who whistled?

    They did not whistle, but they took it to vilify. wink One feels Russian participation. By the way, what is this photo of a tractor? Not MAZ case?

    The Chinese have 3 joint ventures with us for tractor production
  6. Holoy
    Holoy 2 November 2016 15: 35
    +1
    In principle, China zafigachit Nuclear strike very easily ... They have the entire population concentrated in the Primorsky areas, there population density Akhovoe ...
    Fig China where to rock the boat ...
  7. cap
    cap 2 November 2016 15: 46
    0
    Needless to say, the Chinese have lagged behind (like we squandered everything at one time) and they are catching up as they can.
    Anyone would do that. That lacks their mind. Borrow. Everything is logical.
    I am personally pleased that the States have recorded us and the Chinese as their opponents.

    "Tell me who your friend is, and I'll tell you who you are."
    Color certainly does not matter but .... better than blue. laughing
    Again .... a matter of taste. laughing