State Department: Washington has not changed its mind about the future of Syria - there is no place for him in Bashar Assad

67
Washington has not changed its position in relation to President Al-Assad and is confident that he has no place in the future Syria, reports RIA News statement by State Department representative John Kirby.





Earlier, in an interview with the New York Times, Assad said that he would remain at his post at least until the end of his third term in 2021 g, and that there could be no political change unless government forces win the war.

“Nothing has changed in the US position and Washington is still confident that Assad cannot be part of Syria’s long-term future. I have seen the comments, and all I can say is that we (the USA), the MGPU, the UN are committed to resuming political negotiations, so that the political transition can begin. From our point of view, nothing has changed, he (Assad) cannot be part of the long-term future of Syria ", Kirby said.

“We do not share the point of view that negotiations are postponed indefinitely, and we don’t want to see Assad as part of Syria’s long-term future,” he added.

The agency recalls that Asad Bashar last won the presidential election in the ATS in 2014 g, gaining 88,7% of votes. These elections differed from the previous ones in that for the first time several candidates applied for the presidency.

Kirby also said that the United States is not going to cooperate with the Assad regime during the liberation from the militants of the city of Rakka.

“Let me be clear, because there should be no doubt that there are no intentions, plans and goals to work together with the regime (Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad) in any form to combat IS. So it was in the past, it will be so further, ”the State Department representative added.
  • to Reuters
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 November 2016 09: 44
    smile Let's see what the next president will say if he does.
    1. +11
      2 November 2016 10: 00
      Monos Today, 09:44 New
      smile Let's see what the next president will say if he does.
      Which president do you mean American or Syrian? If American, then I’ll tell you so, the phrase will be - Assad must leave. And if the Syrian, then of course he can say a lot, but I think the Syrian people will say for him that Assad is their president and that’s the point! And it is not for the Americans with their bloody snout to decide who should be the president of Syria or any other country.
      1. +7
        2 November 2016 10: 19
        Washington has not changed its position regarding President Assad and is sure that he has no place in future Syria

        The main thing is that Assad would not change his position regarding Washington and be sure that the USA has no place in future Syria.
        1. +14
          2 November 2016 10: 27
          And I did not change my position: In the future there is no place for the United States !!!
    2. +12
      2 November 2016 10: 00
      Drive the mattress with a filthy broom.
      Drive from Syria. To drive from the East neighbor. Drive out of Asia. Drive out of Africa. Drive out of Europe.
      Needed where was born. America is waiting for her prodigal sons home. Fornication at home at your own peril and risk.
      It's my opinion.
      The opinion of the State Department does not interest me. Their opinion is their problem.
      1. +5
        2 November 2016 10: 13
        American Wishlist let them keep with them, neither Russia nor Assad personally, they are not interested, the people of Syria should decide everything in the next presidential election.
      2. 0
        2 November 2016 11: 48
        Quote: Temples
        The opinion of the State Department does not interest me. Their opinion is their problem.
        good
    3. +3
      2 November 2016 10: 06
      for some reason I’m not surprised, it would be on the contrary surprising if they had stated the opposite
    4. +4
      2 November 2016 10: 07
      all US condoms were and will be illegitimate. people did not choose them. they come at the expense of electors
    5. +3
      2 November 2016 10: 07
      If Assad has no place in Washington’s opinion, then he doesn’t give a damn about this opinion, as long as Russia is in Syria and the war is on.
    6. +9
      2 November 2016 10: 10
      Quote: Monos
      smile Let's see what the next president will say if he does.

      State Department: Washington has not changed its mind about the future of Syria - there is no place for Bashar Assad ...

      The State Department forgot to ask the president of the sovereign state of Syria where he would like to see the "opinion" of the State Department and the fate of international terrorists led by their teachers and sponsors who occupied part of Syria ...
    7. +13
      2 November 2016 10: 12
      From our point of view, nothing has changed; he (Assad) cannot be part of Syria’s long-term future. ”

      And from our point of view, nothing has changed; he (Washington) cannot be a part of the long-term future not only of Syria, but also of the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Europe. negative
      1. +4
        2 November 2016 10: 15
        State Department: Washington has not changed its mind about the future of Syria - there is no place for him in Bashar Assad

        To date, the opinion of the State Department is of little concern to anyone. He does not solve anything there.
        1. +2
          2 November 2016 10: 46
          Quote: GSH-18
          He does not solve anything there.

          And not only he all together, they have not been deciding anywhere or for a long time !!!
    8. +2
      2 November 2016 11: 05
      Quote: Monos
      smile Let's see what the next president will say if he does.

      More precisely, probably so - we think that next year, the current US State Department will have no place in Washington.
  2. +24
    2 November 2016 09: 44
    Well yes. And lousy is all about the bath.
    1. +2
      2 November 2016 10: 04
      I have a suspicion that if in reality what happened in the picture happened, then the phrase "Assad must go!" Michelle would have sounded ... laughing
      1. +4
        2 November 2016 10: 18
        Quote: Finches
        I have a suspicion that if in reality what happened in the picture happened, then the phrase "Assad must go!" Michelle would have sounded ... laughing

        It is possible that then "Barack should go!" lol
        1. +3
          2 November 2016 10: 21
          Quote: GSH-18
          Quote: Finches
          I have a suspicion that if in reality what happened in the picture happened, then the phrase "Assad must go!" Michelle would have sounded ... laughing

          It is possible that then "Barack should go!" lol

          Nooo. It should sound like this: Lamb, take out the trash, pliiz.
  3. +6
    2 November 2016 09: 45
    From our point of view, nothing has changed; he (Assad) cannot be part of Syria’s long-term future, ”Kirby said.

    They can’t enter at all, that their point of view is far from the only one! Well stupidity ...
  4. +6
    2 November 2016 09: 46
    State Department one.
    The FBI is different.
    The Pentagon is the third.
    The president is something ...
    As I understand it - a split in an exclusive democratic society?))))
    1. +2
      2 November 2016 10: 46
      shit-democratic pluralism of opinions! We have already gone through this.
  5. +13
    2 November 2016 09: 48
    If someone had doubts about who mattresses and lackeys are fighting with in Syria, the answer is obvious! Not with ISIS, but with the legally elected President Assad (well, with Russia for the company). Shit, b ..... !!! am
    1. +2
      2 November 2016 11: 31
      Quote: bouncyhunter
      Shit, b ..... !!!

      Democracy is the power of the people.
      How it was necessary to pervert a clear and understandable concept that now it is perceived almost as a curse!
      And all because of what? Ameri shout that their democracy is the most democratic on the planet (like, our oil is the most oil in the world lol ), while the two-stage elections in the "beacon" of democracy practically do not take into account the real will of the US people request . It turns out that people came, voted, and the president was still chosen not by them, but by the so-called elective representatives of the elite by the inter-party method! The whole world is looking at this democracy and is slowly swearing stop
  6. +7
    2 November 2016 09: 51
    Would Washington take a walk in the garden?
    1. +9
      2 November 2016 10: 29
      Quote: kit-kat
      Would Washington take a walk in the garden?

      Alexander, are you not mistaken with one letter? Maybe it’s better this way: "Shouldn't Washington take a walk in AD?" hi
  7. +9
    2 November 2016 09: 54
    In Syria, there is no place for Washington, not Assad. Everywhere they put their snotty nose, it would be better to put it in their fifth point.
    1. +2
      2 November 2016 10: 13
      Putin is not Medvedev. He's not for sale for a handshake with "exceptional".
  8. +3
    2 November 2016 10: 04
    as if the opinion of minke whales is interesting to someone
  9. +4
    2 November 2016 10: 05
    Ameri? What is your dog business! The people will express their opinion, and stick your own deep and away!
    1. +2
      2 November 2016 10: 42
      Quote: Fonmeg
      and stick yours deep and far away!

      In by wassat a kidney !!!
  10. +4
    2 November 2016 10: 08
    “We do not share the view that negotiations are postponed indefinitely, and we do not want to see Assad as part of Syria’s long-term future
    stay on the line, your call is very important to us fool
    1. +3
      2 November 2016 10: 23
      Quote: iza top
      “We do not share the view that negotiations are postponed indefinitely, and we do not want to see Assad as part of Syria’s long-term future
      stay on the line, your call is very important to us fool

      You are the 123765458901278th in line of our polite operator wassat
  11. +2
    2 November 2016 10: 08
    Who is Kirby and his opinion ?! The Americans are completely tinned! It’s not for them to decide who is the boss in a foreign country. The bureaucrats are egg-headed! Put things in order in your country, and then judge others! Elections cannot be held normally. Solid falsification. Observers are not allowed. Just howl about democracy, liars!
  12. +2
    2 November 2016 10: 15
    Absolutely insolent! In this case, we did not change our opinion about the future of the USA - there is no place for H. Clinton in it!
  13. +5
    2 November 2016 10: 17
    Impudence and cynicism are off the charts: "they are not going to cooperate with Assad in liberating Raqqa from militants ..."

    And they were invited to cooperate ?! One day, arrogance and belief in "oneness" will lead them to great trouble.
    1. cap
      +1
      2 November 2016 11: 32
      Quote: B.T.W.
      Impudence and cynicism are off the charts: "they are not going to cooperate with Assad in liberating Raqqa from militants ..."

      And they were invited to cooperate ?! One day, arrogance and belief in "oneness" will lead them to great trouble.


      Assad as head of state, just declare no flight zone or weak?
      Can be solved with the Kuzi approach fellow
      1. +2
        2 November 2016 11: 56
        Quote: cap
        For Assad as the head of state, is it easy to declare no flight zone or weak? Maybe he will decide with the Kuzi approach
        As soon as he learns that Kuz'ya's mother has come along with "Kuzya", he will immediately announce! lol
  14. +2
    2 November 2016 10: 17
    What does the US State Department care
    Syria's long-term future
    ?
    We got it already. Stop sniffing under the tail of a donkey (symbol of the US Democratic Party).

    I declare my opinion about the future president of the USA: NO - H. Clinton, YES - D. Trump.
    I announce my opinion about the future of the USA: Divide by 5-6 independent states and forget this problem.
    1. +6
      2 November 2016 10: 40
      Quote: ltc22A
      I declare my opinion about the future of the USA: Divide into 5-6 independent states and forget this problem.

      Better yet, create a strait named after I.V. Stalin !!! am
    2. cap
      0
      2 November 2016 11: 28
      We got it already. Stop sniffing under the tail of a donkey (symbol of the US Democratic Party).

      "Taste and color ......"laughing
  15. +2
    2 November 2016 10: 22
    Yes ..... what they think in the USA and who will be the president of Syria. The president will be the one chosen by the Syrian.
  16. +1
    2 November 2016 10: 32
    Nothing has changed in the US position, and Washington is still confident that Assad cannot be part of Syria’s long-term future.
    "And who are the judges ...?"
  17. +1
    2 November 2016 10: 37
    A black boy will leave lol and Bashar al-Assad will remain Yes !!! Anyone will come new at the flies and Assad will again be in place !!! bully Squeals of frigging empty sound let yourself amuse yourself with your squeals laughing !!! They squeal and think that they are all so cool (hysterical women) wassat !!! Huh huh huh !!! But in general, why argue with such partners ?! This is how these partners say ..., bully so we don’t No. interested !!! wink
  18. +2
    2 November 2016 10: 38
    Burnt stupid Yankees. Raised B / W, failed everything that is possible there and all climb, climb, teach.
  19. +2
    2 November 2016 10: 39
    Wow! We, the lords of the universe. We do not want to see ... Pants will not tear from wide steps?
  20. +1
    2 November 2016 10: 50
    Yes, we don’t care about the opinion of any State Department - Syria is not a United States state, and the decisions of all kinds of Yankees are simply meaningless and stupid at least.
  21. +1
    2 November 2016 11: 04
    The Americans, by virtue of their arrogance and cheating, thought of overthrowing Assad in a few months at most. And when it didn’t work out quickly and beautifully, all that remains is to repeat the same thing from time to time.
  22. +2
    2 November 2016 11: 10
    Where is Washington, and where is Syria ?! Deal with drug trafficking issues on the Mexican border and remove your filthy mercenaries from Syria!
  23. cap
    +1
    2 November 2016 11: 23
    “Let me be clear, because there should be no doubt that there are no intentions, plans and goals to work together with the regime (Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad) in any form to combat IS. So it was in the past, it will be so further, ”the State Department representative added.

    What? sensible thought, Obama is young and strong, quite suitable for the role of "parsley" in the new position.
    If it’s good to bomb the country, the Syrians may well vote for the Nobel Peace Laureate.
    This is an option, but there are more worthy ones for every taste and color.
  24. 0
    2 November 2016 11: 54
    This is the fate of the states in Syria ... the Yankees get out to your home!
  25. +2
    2 November 2016 12: 03
    Well, how can you not quote M. Zadornov: "Well, these Americans are stupid."
  26. 0
    2 November 2016 12: 05
    (Kirby also said that the United States is not going to cooperate with the Assad regime in liberating the city of Raqqa from militants.)

    A very subtle hint that the Americans intend to stake out part of Syria for an indefinite period. What is this if not occupation (for all that nobody invited them to Syria)? Yes
  27. +1
    2 November 2016 12: 08
    [/ i] I saw the comments, and all I can say is we (USA), IHL, UN [i]
    a retired admiral is responsible for the entire globe - k_o_z .....!
  28. 0
    2 November 2016 12: 23
    who will be president in Syria, the Yankees no longer exactly decide ...
  29. 0
    2 November 2016 12: 27
    It is strange that there is not a single liberalist. Do you survive them, or what? In vain. There is no discussion.
    Nevertheless, I will give my cue.
    Everything that Americans do, they do consciously, prudently and completely calmly. Your will, but I would advise you to adhere to the same principles in the comments. If one of them read them, he would have had a lot of fun. Especially in terms of your instructions on what to do. Why make the enemies laugh?
    I hope our leadership is less emotional and reverent than you. Highly.
    1. 0
      2 November 2016 13: 10
      Quote: wldmr
      Everything that Americans do, they do consciously, prudently and completely calmly.


      Something is not observed in the behavior of the current American politicians, or is this information that is incorrectly presented to us (translation inaccuracies) ?!
  30. 0
    2 November 2016 12: 53
    From our point of view, nothing has changed; he (Assad) cannot be part of Syria’s long-term future, ”Kirby said.

    You might think that the Syrians would ask the State Department whom to elect. As soon as the United States stops interfering in the affairs of the SAR, then the concept of "moderate opposition" will disappear along with them ..
  31. 0
    2 November 2016 13: 33
    State Department: Washington has not changed its mind about the future of Syria - there is no place for him in Bashar Assad
    We must also add, and we will never agree with Russia. Only war. Yes?
  32. +1
    2 November 2016 14: 08
    Washington has not changed its mind about the future of Syria - there is no place for Bashar Assad in it
    Russia also does not change its opinion: the Americans should not be the masters in the Middle East. Enough already owned, half the world is in ruin from such a "master". negative
  33. 0
    2 November 2016 20: 14
    70 years have passed, Assad died of old age, the hostess happily tells the press: - You see, ours took !!! Assad has no place in future Syria !!! PS Although it is likely that in 70 years there will be no USA :)
  34. +1
    2 November 2016 21: 34
    Money, gas, oil, pipelines, geopolitics, power! Do not give ordinary people, just live!
  35. 0
    2 November 2016 22: 38
    State Department: Washington has not changed its mind about the future of Syria - there is no place for Bashar Assad in it.
    We, as Russians, do not care about the opinion of the State Department, but we are sure that in the future of the planet, there is no place exceptional.
  36. 0
    3 November 2016 13: 36
    To whom it is and who is not, it is not up to the parasites to decide, let it be decided at home. And in Syria, the people of Syria will decide. And in general, do not care about the opinion of parasites.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"