Militants attack Aleppo. Exclusive report by Eugene Poddubny

37
In Syrian Aleppo, militants are increasingly attacking residential areas - so that civilians have to leave their homes and retreat deep into the city. All the latest details from the combat zone - from the war correspondent of the All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company Yevgeny Poddubny.



    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    37 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +7
      29 October 2016 20: 02
      Quite a predictable price for the so-called "truce". A sort of Syrian "Minsk".
      1. +2
        29 October 2016 22: 25
        Quote: Duga
        Quite a predictable price for the so-called "truce". A sort of Syrian "Minsk".

        What a panic is, it’s not yet clear why and for whom, this offensive will end badly, I still believe that we don’t have oaks in the leadership and everyone sees and understands us better. This has been proven more than once.
        1. +1
          30 October 2016 02: 06
          Quote: Gorjelin
          This has been proven more than once.

          ? .. Do not remind me more specifically WHEN? ..
          1. +1
            30 October 2016 11: 31
            Do not remind more specifically WHEN?

            And this is when the Belgians bombed Deir ez-Zor, and we, in response, threatened them with the lips of Lavrov, although earlier we said: "... just let them try ...".
        2. +1
          30 October 2016 11: 20
          we do not have oaks in the manual

          Yes, "Solntselikom" and it does not matter dozens, hundreds or thousands of civilians will die there (I am not talking about the SAR fighters), by the way, this is also typical for Donbass, I did not mention "Minsk" for nothing, the main thing is to continue to maintain the image of a peacemaker.
          1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      29 October 2016 20: 04
      It is simply amazing what people are capable of when they click in their brains.
    3. +5
      29 October 2016 20: 05
      Avot us and the results of a break in the work of our aviation VKS ....
    4. +3
      29 October 2016 20: 06
      the pause was good. The Americans fussed for a reason. Cover them in a heap with something large!
    5. The comment was deleted.
      1. +6
        29 October 2016 21: 47
        - those who believe that in Syria or elsewhere it is possible to resolve all issues by military means. There is a big political game and not only the fate of this state is being decided in Syria, but also the issues of the continued existence and sovereignty of the countries of the European Union, Russia, etc. And our head of state, together with the Foreign Ministry, are doing everything possible to translate the process into a political channel, thereby reducing the number of deaths of ordinary citizens in Syria. In this regard, it is very gratifying that our Ministry of Defense, too, unlike individual commentators here on the site, seeks not to wave its mind with a saber and tongue, but to turn on its head.
        When the political dialogue comes to a standstill, Russia, at the military priority, explains everything to everyone, but leaves the door open for a constructive political dialogue. Pauses are a time not only for regrouping terrorists, but also for preparing the political and informational maneuver of Russia. We used all previous breaks as efficiently as possible in this regard.
        Do not forget that terrorists — you’re only an instrument, it’s stupid to fight only with an instrument — you still have to hit the arm that controls it. And we do it expertly! Learn from Putin and Lavrov! The screech of the Anglo-Saxons does not subside ..
        And as for the terrorists, sooner or later, any party that will solve their tasks in this region will clean them up. It's unavoidable.
        1. +1
          29 October 2016 23: 32
          Quote: _man_
          And as for the terrorists, sooner or later, any party that will solve their tasks in this region will clean them up. It's unavoidable.


          It would be naive to say that. There are still many countries with "non-democratic governments".
          1. +2
            30 October 2016 22: 33
            It is naive to think that terrorists can be effectively controlled in any long term. As soon as the tasks facing the puppeteers are solved (and I mean not just the overthrow of Assad - this is just a screen, the tasks are much more ambitious, if we recall Iraq and Libya), the cannon fodder will be easily used so that they do not get confused under their feet, only the most "moderates" who will continue to happily sell oil to Europe for 2-3 dollars a barrel, legalizing it under the guise of supplying shale oil from the United States, and also continue to throw mud at Russia and other dissenting states at the behest from Washington.
            The radicals can be cleaned up in different ways, with maximum benefit for themselves, including instigating some provocation for the Allies - sending the most frostbitten to a direct clash with the armies of Israel, Europe, simultaneously providing air support to one or the other. Well, or absolutely perfectly - in the direction of the CIS countries.
            But the armed forces of all these countries, with all due respect to the Syrian army, are no match for it today. If the radicals are cleaned up, and this probability is somewhere around 95% - good, no - even better, you can extend the agony and catch fish in the muddy water in the territories of the newly destroyed states ..
            1. 0
              30 October 2016 22: 47
              This Russia does not divide the terrorists into moderate and immoderate (honestly speaking, I am losing weight with this phrase, because the opposition usually sits in parliament.)

              In any case, this rabble (who are on the battlefield) will not all be used up, but will smoothly migrate to another theater of military operations, sorry, a place for peaceful demonstrations against the next "regime." The practice has proven itself quite successfully.
              1. 0
                30 October 2016 23: 03
                Take a look at this video. Half of those who stand behind the "preacher" will remain.

                The hierarchy is big. There are those who, living in the west, are engaged in the unconstitutional activities of this country, because his actions are supervised by special services.

                1. +3
                  31 October 2016 23: 57
                  I do not claim that they will clean up ALL "oppositionists". They will clean up those who play too much, have lost touch with the reality of the events taking place, have ceased to fulfill their function, i.e. the most radical when the need for them disappears. Why do you think Russia demands to separate the terrorists from the opposition? - incl. to legitimize goals on an international scale.
                  And instructors with more "moderate" can really be transferred anywhere. The migration crisis in Europe is an example of this.
                  1. 0
                    1 November 2016 01: 31
                    Quote: _man_
                    Why do you think Russia wants to separate terrorists from the opposition? - including to legitimize goals internationally.


                    Salafism (and this religious trend, by "misunderstanding" now unites all moderate and immoderate) must go back to where it came from, namely in the seventh century. Declare this movement a sect like Aum Shinrikyo.

                    The West and the United States will take this step only when a wave of terror engulfs these countries. And not brought from somewhere, but among his fellow citizens.
                    If at least a drop of reason remained with them, then earlier.

                    I’ll leave the film interesting. Good luck.

                    1. +2
                      6 November 2016 00: 00
                      Thanks for the information.
                      People face many difficulties in their lives, and traditional religions are far from always able to give them answers to the questions that people have on the basis of life circumstances. However, certain religious and near-religious movements offer these people the answers they need, often very far from the truth, but give and give hope, and for many people hope is the main thing.
                      Hence the popularity of these movements.
                      In these conditions, the task of any public and social institutions interested in reversing this trend of popularizing radical "Islam" is precisely to provide people with the information they need in full. This also applies to the church, in particular.
                      Regarding terror, it is doubtful that the United States will take this step. The scenario of the Islamization of Europe was largely implemented by the US elites, and terror is only a certain part of this scenario. The flow of migrants to Europe, most of whom are young men of military age, fully fit into this concept, and it is no secret that very large funds were invested by the states in support of various NGOs in Europe, which carried out this "humanitarian" mission to deliver refugees radicals to Europe. Obama, by the way, openly stated that we are living in a period when new countries are being formed on the territory of Europe and old countries and peoples will disappear into oblivion.
                      However, after the implementation of this scenario, the order in Islamized Europe should have been brought up by the states at all. Energy resources and other crap are just carrots for American elites and a kind of cover for operations in the region.
                      Russia, through its intervention, largely destroyed this scenario, essentially saving Europe from the brutal massacre into which it is being pushed by partners in the United States. Although the massacre is still entirely possible, especially given the selfless desire of many European elites to serve the United States to the detriment of the interests of their own countries and peoples.
                      But the essence of the West is that we most likely will never hear thanks for saving Europe. The morality of the overwhelming majority of Europeans is not the same and the memory is short.
                      Therefore, the radicals will be cleaned up, but not when terror engulfs these countries (the United States expects that only Eurasia will engulf), but when it will be beneficial to one or another side.
                      Russia will destroy the radicals in any case, because the support of those who commit crimes against humanity will never correspond to the moral principles of Russian people.
            2. 0
              31 October 2016 22: 30
              Quote: _man_
              cannon fodder will easily be used up, so that they don't get confused underfoot, only the most "moderate" will remain, who will continue to happily sell oil to Europe
              After answering one comment, I began to read on - and grabbed my head! Here he is - a real sofa general! Have you ever seen a living terrorist, "man"? Not behind bars - in green stuff ?! Do you think this is "easy consumable cannon fodder" ?! Holy naivete! You know - none of them will agree with this opinion, moreover: in a very "well-argued" way they can explain to such an "analyte" that he is wrong! wassat .. Everything - everything is clear to me already, there is obviously nothing to discuss further. I recommend you, if you suddenly happen to want to discuss with me: DO NOT. I will ignore it. I hate this cynicism that power demonstrates to us day after day - I'm fed up! - and I can’t stand upset conceit. You and I "do not agree in characters," my dear. So - success and prosperity!
              1. +2
                2 November 2016 19: 53
                [quote] I recommend you, if you suddenly happen to want to discuss with me: DO NOT. I will ignore it. [/ Quote]
                [quote] and I can’t stand the arrogant conceit. [/ quote]
                No wonder they say that we are most intolerant of the manifestation of our vices in other people. Still, our subconscious mind is a powerful thing, and here it burst through you ..
                Do you recommend me? Should I have a wish? Discuss with YOU?
                And is it still a bogus conceit ?? )))))
                Have we taken the habit of our Western opponents to put everything upside down? Well, let it remain on your conscience.
                quote] You and I "do not agree with characters", [/ quote]
                It turns out according to your logic, as you described me, and according to your passages and character, we all agree 100%. Only here is the logic you have and the passages are inappropriate, continuous snorting and withdrawal from the question.
                Only I do not attribute myself to such, so by, comrade.
                I see that leading a discussion with you is an ungrateful, futile business. Since, judging by your opuses, you belong to the category of people - now I’ll do some tricks, and then I’ll figure it out, at least the grass will not grow there. The bull saw a red rag in the torreador’s hand and let's rush at it ..
                Simply, you don’t have strategic thinking either in general or in this particular case.
                I argue my judgment
                [quote] debate with me: NOT NECESSARY. Ignore [/ quote]
                What logical fork follows from this?
                1. I will not answer - you are on horseback, you have defeated the insidious "couch general" who did not appear for the war.
                2. I will answer, I will object, without touching you for a living - ignore, you are a "real kid", keep your word!
                3. I will answer very reasonably, after which your reputation will look flawed in any case, because:
                firstly, even portraying a tough kid in the absence of an adequate response to constructive criticism, in fact, you perceive criticism by default as corresponding to reality; you can pretend that they didn’t notice what he wrote there, or what excuse to come up with for complacency, but this does not change the essence;
                secondly, if you answer, then the image of a tough kid no longer shines for you, you do not keep your word!
                As a result, they themselves deliberately put themselves in a stalemate, out of the blue, abandoning the dialogue.
                In the same way, you and our Ministry of Defense with diplomats want to lead to a monastery, lead to a dead end, from which you will go to the right - it’s very bad, on the other hand, it’s finally PPC ..
                What were you going to justify your position with? Insults? Well, a weighty argument. Sofa general, analyte! What do you care about my person and status? Are you collecting a virtual army there? The foreign epaulettes seem to you everywhere, do not let you sleep?
                In essence, the information presented has something to say? No - so go your way.
                Oh yes, essentially it was probably
                [quote] Have you ever seen a living terrorist, "man"? Not behind bars - in green stuff ?! Do you think that this is "easy consumable cannon fodder"?! [/ Quote]
                Is that your argument? Yes, already, without fish, as they say ..
                I’ve never seen you either, maybe you’re a bot, but somehow it’s a little to me, because if you spew out destructive and distorted information, and I have the opportunity to answer you, I will answer.
                If you are considering terrorism and terrorists in particular as a subject of government, then this is your problem. As practice shows, including and in Syria, the subject always controls the terrorists from the outside, if the object ceases to fulfill the commands of the subject or the risks of damage from the existence of the object exceed its usefulness, the object is destroyed. Remember how many press secretaries and treasurers of ISIS and other terrorist organizations, i.e. people really possessing access to very important information was destroyed by the owners themselves (and their ilk and the whole retinue, guards, random fighters).
                However, WHO am I telling !? Not at all afraid to infringe on your exorbitant ego, I will answer for myself - NOT to you, but to thinking people who are receptive to constructive information.
                "I will not wish you success, since I do not believe in this success one iota" - if you wish, you will find the original source yourself, if you misinterpreted something, I beg your pardon, quoted from memory.
        2. +2
          30 October 2016 02: 12
          Quote: _man_
          translate the process into a political channel, thereby reducing the number of deaths of ordinary citizens in Syria.
          A FAST and effective operation to eliminate terrorists can reduce the number of deaths of these citizens. It was not in vain that the military turned to Putin with the question of resuming airstrikes - they can better see on the spot what is happening in reality! But our head of state is not a military man - he is a scout, accustomed to "playing" virtual chess, not always taking into account that quite real people are behind the figures on his board. And while this "game" is going on, people continue to die. CIVIL. EVERYDAY..
          1. +2
            30 October 2016 23: 52
            Let me remind you for a moment that no other head of state, except for GDP, has even a fraction of the experience that he obtained during the liquidation of the terrorist nursery in the territory of the Chechen Republic, financed and supported at the political level in the West. I can say the same thing about the experience of the Russian armed forces - now we have no equal in this regard, because our country and our army in particular have paid for it with a lot of blood.
            There you will not deny that it was a "FAST and effective operation" that was carried out !?
            I also remind you that the territory of Syria is not the same as the territory of Russia, where the stabilization of the domestic political situation made it possible to quickly stop the infection by military means - all that was needed was for the patriot to come to power. Syria is for a moment a sovereign state, with the very shaken (artificially, but fact) status of power structures in the international arena. Moreover, all the parties involved - the West, Russia and the UN agree on one thing - there can only be a political solution. If you wish, upon reflection, you yourself will understand why this is an objective necessity.
            The army should be involved when all the ways to agree have been lost. This is exactly what Russia is doing. Pauses are needed. Where there are guns firing, diplomacy is gone and cannot be, it will be called in a different way ...
            In addition, do not forget that all processes in the world are interconnected. Russia will not add extra points in the election race of Hilary Clinton, behind which are the most active lobbyists of the massacre of Bashar Assad and the civilian population of Syria. The last provocations of the states in this direction (Idlib) have choked, including because Russia has the patience and knows when to use aviation, when diplomacy, and when to work in all possible spectra.
            1. +1
              31 October 2016 22: 15
              Quote: _man_
              do not forget that all processes in the world are interconnected.

              Quote: _man_
              The army should be involved when all the ways to agree have been lost.

              Quote: _man_
              Syrian territory is not the same as the territory of Russia
              You know, "man".. You, sorry, are talking nonsense, and you yourself do not notice him point blank, admiring the verified (or rather, overheard) phrases and thoughts. You quote the frank cliches that our politicians use - for what explains our inaction in Syria now is natural politicking! - nor do you understand the essence of a specific problem!
              And the problem is that in an effort to "save as many lives of civilians in Aleppo as possible by dragging out the" humpause "", our "leaders" provoke an increase in the number of victims among these very peaceful!
              Refusal to continue air strikes, at the moment when significant forces of IS are breaking through from Iraq, with the aim of unblocking the bandit group in Aleppo - this refusal can lead to the loss of just the strategic initiative! Then the military - and ours, incl. - you will have to try again to "catch up with the departing train" .. History shows that this is achieved with a lot of blood - if at all it is possible.
              Try to clearly answer the simple question: Why are we in Syria?
              If to assist the Assad government, what kind of assistance are we talking about? Military?.. A strange way to achieve military success, giving the enemy time to regroup and rearm.
              Political? Over and over again yielding to the insistence of the "partners", and not requiring them to "fully" fulfill their own obligations, one can earn a reputation as a "political sucker"!
              Military-technical? Well, then it was not necessary at all to start up all this gimp with VKS and other! would give Bashar weapons and ammunition, and - go!
              Ah, yeah, I forgot about one more option: we are fighting international terrorism "on distant frontiers"! .. however, a strange way of fighting - with the help of "pauses" for rest ... You say,
              Quote: _man_
              Where guns are firing, diplomacy is no longer there and cannot be,

              .. AND WITH WHOM are you there, in Aleppo, gathered to breed diplomacy, dear man ?! WITH TERRORISTS ?! So after all, it seems like they should be destroyed, not negotiated!
              Quote: _man_
              all parties involved - the West, Russia and the UN agree on one thing - there can only be a political solution.
              that is, we paint terrorists in white, put them at the negotiating table, and engage - through popular elections - in power in Syria. SO? I HAVE NOTHING ANYTHING ?! wassat
              You will somehow decide what you are talking about, and what ways of achieving the Goals you are talking about. And then "horses, people mixed up in a heap ..." and misunderstandings begin.
              1. +1
                1 November 2016 01: 55
                Quote: avia1991
                And then "horses, people mixed up in a heap ..." and misunderstandings begin.



                Sergey, everything really mixed up there.
                Here you speak. "terrorist" And the Saudis are respected people.

                And what the Saudis have is right - "oil".
                What has Russia done so that its economy does not care at all at 40 dollars per barrel, nothing.
                But the Saudis may not go for oil quotas.
                Are you satisfied with inflation in 6 percent so far?
                This is only for the Saudis, and there are also the interests of the "favorite partner" - the West and many others in descending order.

                Although, until the militants from Aleppo are knocked out, I am for the party of the war and without smoke breaks.
                Gathering evidence, but who needs it?
                1. +1
                  4 November 2016 01: 11
                  Greetings, Alexander hi
                  the quote you quoted in my comment related to the reasoning of another Mr., and not to the situation in Syria. Everything was really confused there, and a year ago I expressed the opinion that it was more like a fight for oil than a war on terrorism. It's just that Russia, in this situation, has led its line more competently, from the point of view of international law - why everyone in the West snapped at us: there is nothing to "get to the bottom of"! And THEY made a bet on terrorists, whose hands were planning to remove the Assad regime - and then quickly butcher ISIS "like a nut", acting as the Savior of the world from the terrorist plague, and at the same time gaining undivided access to not the weakest reserves of hydrocarbons! And then such a bummer .. "to let all the dogs down on Russia" is more from impotent anger. Although they can mess with us, and not weak - with the same Mosul.
                  Quote: Simple
                  But the Saudis may not go for oil quotas.
                  Are you satisfied with inflation in 6 percent so far?
                  The Saudis have already gone — in any case, there is their agreement in principle, there are more stoppers in Iran. As for 6% inflation - Alexander, I would be glad if it were like that. In reality, this is 12-15%, and this, of course, does not suit me. But to correct the situation with the help of rising oil, in my opinion, is a hopeless business - в any foreseeable future! Firstly, this is raw materials - and it makes no sense to claim the role of a global power, having a raw material economy.
                  And secondly, no matter how the oil lobby rests, it will still have to give way to other energy sources. And here it is important that at the right time there should already be new technologies, equipment, and production facilities in the country. And therefore, you still have to get off the oil pipe, and invest in the development of real industry - not just the oil refinery.
                  Quote: Simple
                  until the militants from Aleppo are beaten out, I am for the party of war and without smoke breaks.
                  Exactly! I totally agree!
                  This, firstly, will save considerable money - the shorter the war, the less ruinous it is request and secondly, paradoxically, victory and the expulsion of the remnants of the bandits from Syria will untie our hands on the international arena. For speaking in the language of diplomacy, with a destroyed breeding ground of terror behind your back, is much more profitable than continuing to mute indistinctly on the spot, crucifying in your striving for "humanism." The states in Mosul don't care much about the civilian population - they stupidly get their way and they do not care that we are a thousand times more "to the right" - they will get the RESULT, and we - "a reassured conscience". From the point of view of observing the state interests of the Russian Federation, the result is very doubtful.
              2. +2
                4 November 2016 16: 10
                Your trouble is that you personify the above information too much:
                .. at point blank you do not notice, admiring the verified (or rather, overheard) phrases and thoughts. You quote the frank cliches that our politicians use

                What is the meaning of who, where and what uses? One and the same information can be turned for good, or vice versa, sent for destruction. And if a person is not prepared, i.e. Since he does not have his own set of factology, knowledge and skills to distinguish between doubtful information and reliable information, his judgment on any process is likely to be erroneous or distorted, no matter who says it - a liberal, patriot, or a specific state official, or idly staggering onlooker.
                Master already, it doesn’t matter WHO said - it matters WHAT is said (or stated). those. essence.
                If you think that what you wrote on this thread is not stamped, and you have not overheard it, peered, or read it, you are deeply mistaken. This is the naivety of pure water. The stamps are very close by, but I don’t even want to waste time poking your nose in them, if you are a decent person, you yourself will find them if you want, looking at your comments from the side, without emotions.
                A person is an information-sensitive being, and what you expose is only part of the information background into which you are embedded, like a parrot repeating other people's thoughts, passing them off as your own.
                I'll tell you even more - they are already your own, tk. you associate them with yourself. And personally, I do not see anything wrong with this, except for empty "shaking the air" out of the blue and not wanting to adequately convey your point of view to others, as well as to perceive a point of view that is different from yours.
                So, your absurd attacks on me, in your own terminology, are a manifestation of the local "politicking" so hated by you, and throwing dust in the eyes instead of discussing issues on the merits. It's easier for you to avoid collision with people who expound information that does not fit into the stereotypes in your head, but this is your own business, and I would not bother to convey to you these obvious things for many if you did not force me to this with their idle speculations.
                Regarding politicking, my advice to you do not be lazy - familiarize yourself with the etymology of the word "politics", and then perhaps you will use the word "politicking" less in your everyday life.
                Essentially
                what explains our inaction in Syria now

                What exactly do you call inaction? The fact that our servicemen are unabashedly working in the region in the widest possible range: aviation, navy, special forces, intelligence, etc. .. Or that our diplomats are conducting round-the-clock explanatory work with the international community, formalizing concrete decisions and ideologically breaking all attempts Americans to legitimize terrorists as a political force. Or the efforts of our president, implemented 24 hours a day everywhere, including to put in place those who nurtured and set this pack of dogs (people don’t turn their tongues to call them) to peaceful people? at least you call a spade a spade.
                It may be a revelation for you that a humanitarian pause is essentially a humanitarian mission in a very difficult situation, involving a large number of resources, both human and technical and organizational. Is this inaction ??
                You are familiar with the phrase - "a bad peace is better than a good war." I also listened to her, as the people say, and the people are always very keen on phraseological units, which always reflect the essence.
                Refusal to continue airstrikes, at a time when significant IS forces erupt

                You are our all-consuming man, you cannot see beyond the flames of war that life is much more multifaceted. You reason like this - now, the enemy has appeared, now is the time to slam him, now now now! Without bothering to think about it, the information environment allows you to take this action, whether you have enough political and other resource stability afterwards, so as not to repeat the fate of Milosevic, or Gaddafi, or Hussein. Now I'm not even talking about GDP, specifically our military commanders in charge of the operation in Syria are facing the most humane court - the court of the world "democratic" community. And the consequences of such a trial are obvious. These people are real patriots of their country, because know what they are signing up for, and tk. The only way for them to exercise their legal right to a quiet life is to prevent Russia from collapsing. But Russia cannot be protected by one army. Remember the collapse of the USSR - the most powerful army in the world in all respects, and the country collapsed without a single shot. What happened to all the professional patriots, and above all to the military? I think it's not worth telling.
                Our military, incl. then they turn to the GDP, because it is their sacred duty to inform the commander-in-chief in time about the current situation and give proposals on the most successful time for the implementation of certain actions. As well as the sacred duty of the GDP in its current status to adequately assess the entire range of information coming from both the military and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and from their political opponents and say: "I understood everything, but" it is not time yet guys, "or "Everything, the macro-political situation corresponds to the moment, the rear is covered - go for it!" The head of state is addressed as a person / structure that possesses all information about the ongoing process and is able to adequately assess the situation from all sides. If the question lay only in the military plane, there would be no need at all for the intervention of the GDP, the right to make decisions would be delegated to the Ministry of Defense, you finally understand.
                Break away from your fantasies that everything can be decided by military means. This is not so with the terrorists either. In today's world, in order to realize their right to destroy them, especially in another country, especially since the West has called us to, especially since the West has spent so much effort on creating ISIS, this right has to be gnawed, legitimized, and other participants involved in this process. , conduct explanatory work, destroy various informational stuffing, including and yours, though sincere and patriotic, but unfaithful.
                Instead of helping all parties involved in the process on the part of Russia and creating an appropriate information space, you will discredit these actions, while understanding (reading, understanding, listening /
                "eavesdrop") what and why you are stupidly lazy. Admit it to yourself. And do not try to claim the ultimate truth in the heat of your delusions.
                Try to clearly answer the simple question: Why are we in Syria?

                I already wrote so much to you on this subject, and you yourself already just wrote so much to this site, and in particular this site is full of information about why we are in Syria.
                And further on your specific questions, I have also already answered, incl. and in the text of this comment, I will not repeat. However, I repeat the remark to you - call a spade a spade, do not distort, because in fact you have not asked a single adequate question. And to pose questions in such a way that the other side was forced to first explain to you that it is not white but black and you just distort the situation, it is a waste of time.
                .. AND WITH WHOM are you there, in Aleppo, gathered to breed diplomacy, dear man ?! WITH TERRORISTS ?! So after all, it seems like they should be destroyed, not negotiated!
                that is, we paint terrorists in white, put them at the negotiating table, and engage - through popular elections - in power in Syria. SO? I HAVE NOTHING ANYTHING ?!

                Here, I distort, but even though the question is inadequate, I will answer. It is always and everywhere possible to negotiate only with a contracting party. Terrorists obviously do not belong to that. But their owners and creators in the person of the United States belong. And while you are fooling around here, and pouring dirt on our diplomats with GDP, these people are doing their job and are doing it at the highest level. Our diplomats do not have the same level in the world now, and GDP, too.
                "horses, people mingled in a bunch.
                - You have rightly noticed this, about the confusion in your own head.
    6. +7
      29 October 2016 20: 11
      Interestingly, and on them absolutely, absolutely it is impossible to give pain? Or another HPP? It was not just that they were flooded, obviously the command from Washington gave the go-ahead. Why is it impossible to bomb out and then say something in the spirit of the Yankees - "This is not us", "Oh, this is a mistake", "The USA is to blame for everything!"
      Honestly guys, I don't understand something. The rods are tanks, they are firing the MLRS, and we are making ourselves "good". We will still be accused of all sins, why are we silent?
    7. +5
      29 October 2016 20: 19
      What was required to be proved, although what proof was needed? Everything was clear in advance. But we sacredly observe the "HUMANITARIAN PAUSE". And people are dying. Innocent.
      Under "humanitarian" shelling. Eh .....
    8. +4
      29 October 2016 20: 31
      Well, yes, we are white and fluffy ... Who will appreciate it? The militants, obviously, got the go-ahead ...
    9. +4
      29 October 2016 20: 46
      It’s interesting if now the barmalei overturn Assad’s troops and they just run away? Didn’t this happen? They will leave everything that was conquered by blood, simply stop believing in such help and start looking for where to go from the country - that then (aviation can do a lot, but it will not replace the infantry), even the breakthrough of the so-called encirclement will not affect the positive side at all. Maybe everything should be in moderation and the truce is the same?. Why wouldn’t he iron these tanks and artillery from nowhere until they showed up ... all this is incomprehensible and to say the least. The situation causes an unpleasant aftertaste - it is difficult to imagine how the Syrians feel. I really hope that everyone has a plan in this, and not the result of gross errors.
    10. +1
      29 October 2016 21: 24
      A new portion was driven into the Aleppo meat grinder for the disposal of jihadists, which no one can drive into the stall, they normally agree somewhere and exterminate portionwise, for this they also need silence modes than to chase after them in the desert where they use underground burrows. A normal plan, so maybe in a year or two everyone will grind there, it’s better there than in Central Asia they will crawl out, as soon as I get more I think we’ll bomb, then we will wait again for them there.
    11. +3
      29 October 2016 21: 33
      I just stupidly do not understand one thing: really these "humanitarian pauses" that in Syria or the "truce" in Donbass did not teach the Russian leadership anything? In the Russian Federation, many politicians say that the Americans are stepping on the same rake, but I think that the Russian Federation is essentially already dancing on a rake and, moreover, energetically.
      What has this notorious "humanitarian pause" led to? Only to more bloodshed with at times intensified fierceness and cruelty. The result of all these events, both in Syria and in the Donbass, are the same: only even greater problems and blood.
      1. +2
        29 October 2016 22: 12
        If you think that in Ukraine or in Syria everything can be solved by military means, you are very naive.
        Why pauses are needed, I have already briefly described above
    12. +4
      29 October 2016 22: 08
      I don't agree with anyone, sorry. In my opinion, brilliant. Hope my thoughts are not wrong. What came to mind: To clean up Aleppo with a division of well-motivated and trained fighters settled scattered in city quarters and underground labyrinths is a very bloody and long task to complete. Humanitarian pauses, humanitarian corridors, etc. are being created, but we ourselves are in a trend that it is so impossible! That the militants regroup and launch a counteroffensive !!! that the West will help them !!! the Americans from Mosul will release (and bring directly to Hammereh) one more division, and they will directly kill all the Assad men !!! (that is, practically we ourselves will zombie them for a breakthrough). Apparently, they really went for it. And this is their mistake, and I hope this is their calculation - to destroy the bulk of the militants from the position of defense, when the attackers have more losses. Those who remain, with the correct calculation, will be greatly demoralized, the combat units are disparate, the clearing of Aleppo will already become a matter of technology. I hope this is in the minds of our military experts, this is not the level of Iranian specialists. Hopefully. I, of course, did not command divisions, but the officer himself, and that is exactly what I would have done. In my opinion, lies on the surface. Hopefully, we are deliberately waiting for the breakthrough and preparing for this. If so, in a few days the situation will change dramatically not in favor of the United States and right before their elections. If so, Putin today, on the basis of this, started a misinformation about "extending" gum. pauses - I take off my hat. I really want to think that this is so. So simple...
      1. +1
        29 October 2016 22: 47
        The plan is good - God forbid that would happen !!!!
    13. +1
      29 October 2016 22: 21
      I hope that the VKS intelligence in Syria was not idle and was collecting information about the militants. I hope that the presence of Russian troops during this time has significantly increased quantitatively and qualitatively. I hope that the air defense, missile defense and electronic warfare systems are fully operational and will still produce unexpected results that have not yet been disclosed. I hope that our Northern Fleet will not pass by Syria. I hope that Russia in Syria will still show its strength, and TIME IS NECESSARY to create an attack force grouping.
    14. +1
      29 October 2016 22: 47
      Don't stop admiring good Evgeny Poddubny! His courage and courage! As well as truthful good reports from the theater!
    15. 0
      29 October 2016 23: 57
      I think that in the current situation, the main effect is political. Barmaley, from the so-called "moderate opposition", themselves hammer nails into the coffin of any opposition in Syria. After the massive shelling of residential areas, only the opinion of which can be neglected will stand up for them. After that, calmly finish off the remaining jihadists, without divorcing discussions with the "civilized" world. The end is coming to the bobby.
    16. 0
      30 October 2016 05: 01
      What is Putin waiting for? Again we will be in full w ...! This is again a lot of sacrifices! Let's make it like in Chechnya! It seems that our leadership has no other tactics. We have not yet learned to fight this carrion!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"