Military Review

Coma of the Yalta world

Coma of the Yalta world

History Yalta's world is uniquely ending. The United Nations, created to ensure stability and security in it, no longer performs both of these functions. No matter how paradoxical it may sound, the main reason should be considered the world between the world's leading centers of power. It turned out to be too global and too long.

On the one hand, this is as good as all conflicts, even local ones, are becoming more and more destructive and bloody. Over the 3,5 year of the war in Bosnia, the number of victims (killed and wounded) reached 200 thousand. However, nobody knows for sure. A number of sources mention up to 300 thousand, although officially the UN prefers to rely on the "consensus figure" in 100 thousand. However, nobody opposes 2,2 million refugees. And this, please note, is only a conflict of low intensity, i.e. by military standards, just a small family squabble, without the massive use of regular armies of advanced industrialized countries.

But, on the other hand, it should be recognized that this is bad, since, having fulfilled its original function, the Yalta geopolitical mechanism ceased to work. It is very difficult to imagine demarches like the leaving of the UN conference room by representatives of leading countries during the discussion of the most important issues of international security during the times of, say, the post-war USSR. Because then the case had all chances to end soon with the exchange of strategic nuclear strikes. And this moment was clearly understood by all politicians involved in international affairs on both sides of the curtain.

It should be noted that once the system did a global failure. After 17 years from the date of the end of World War II, in 1962, the Caribbean crisis occurred, which almost did not become the beginning of the Third World War. The parties suddenly hiccupped, woke up, slept off their faces and preferred for the best agreement with the world. The USSR removed missiles from Cuba, the United States withdrew them from Turkey and Western Europe. However, this shock was enough for everyone to come to their senses and not to joke like that.

Unfortunately, the world has changed today. Detente and disarmament policies led to conditions that were fundamentally different from Yalta. Neither side has the capacity to wage a global war with any positive goal. Reciprocal guaranteed nuclear destruction cannot be called such.

And without a positive goal, the very concept of war between equal opponents has lost its meaning. No matter who is the first to use strategic nuclear weapon, in any case, the winner will come out except cockroaches, which will get nuclear ashes for the long years of nuclear winter. Such a result is justified only in the version "do not you get to anyone." It is understandable for sensible people that in such conditions it is only possible to talk about the war in the media and show it in blockbusters, but it can only be conducted by the big ones against the small ones, such as the USA against Afghanistan, NATO against Libya, the coalition against Iraq, or the terrorists against the socially and politically weak ( like LIH (forbidden in the Russian Federation) against American puppets in the Middle East or against Europe). But definitely not the United States and / or NATO against the Russian Federation or even China.

Together with the joy of achieving the goals declared by the relaxation of international tension in the 70-ies of the twentieth century, the retribution came for it. If practically any trick in public geopolitics does not lead to the immediate beginning of the Third World War, then this means a critical decrease in the relevance of compliance with the Yalta norms. Permanent representatives of four countries at the UN (Great Britain, USA, France and Ukraine) left the hall at the moment when the Syrian Ambassador Bashar Jaafari took the floor, denouncing the double standards of the West in the fight against terrorism.

Almost bydlyatski. No, well, what do we do for it? Yes, we wanted to spit on the opinion of the Syrian. We consider only our opinion to be correct. Point. And in fact, they are absolutely right. For the third consecutive year, starting in February of 2014, from the Ukrainian Maidan, or to be more precise, for the eighth year (starting with the 08 / 08 / 08 war) the collective West is more frankly showing disregard for the norms of the Yalta world. So what? And nothing!

Sanctions. Counter-sanctions. All sorts of embargoes, undercover and not so, - all this is sheer garbage. For there is no main thing - the horror from the throw of the Soviet tank wedges to the shores of the Atlantic, bloody battles in the Fulda Corridor, a combined air and sea landing on the British Isles, a desperate aviation and submarines with US Navy carrier groups in the Central and North Atlantic. And without him, why show respect?

Since there is no respect even in the supreme body of international security - the UN Security Council - then where will it come from in the structures of secondary and real policies that are not initially responsible? Especially when it comes to organizations, by their nature, as if they were generally private, independent, they adhered to the UN for solidity. For example, about Human Rights Watch. More 80 humanitarian organizations have called on the UN member countries to exclude Russia from the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) because of the situation with Syria!

In short, it finally goes to the collapse of the UN as the main geopolitical mechanism of international security. The organization has already been publicly used as a simple wrapper for Western desires. If any of her resolutions succeed in covering up her whim - well. No - well, to hell with it, we can do without it. By the way, Libya and Iraq were fine.

While the world was drifting towards obvious unipolarity, this did not play any role, but when the leader was exhausted and, as they say, she found a scythe on a stone, the situation changed fundamentally. Geopolitics is gradually returning to multipolarity, and it is categorically incompatible with such arrogant conceit of "one of the partners".

The problem, however, is that it is already impossible in principle to return the former respect for the UN mechanism. The West will not give up the original parity of its rights in the UN, and, let's be honest, there are a lot of things on the planet, including the Lugansk and Donetsk Republics, the 201 state. 193 of them are members of the UN, but in any serious way there is only a little more than a dozen solving. From a mutually recognized neutral place to find mutually acceptable solutions to controversial UN issues, it has long been turned into a mixture of bureaucracy with the global international market, where an absolute majority of participants only trade their votes in favor of certain political and material preferences.

This means that an urgent need is emerging for a new, more efficient system. Another question is that without total and, more importantly, public destruction, the old system will not give its place to it. So fights here can not be avoided. It will not happen tomorrow, but the fact that it has become inevitable - the issue is actually resolved.

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site:

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. USSR 1971
    USSR 1971 1 November 2016 07: 24
    As JV Stalin said, the worst will begin when the leaders of the Yalta troika come from the generation of those who have not seen the war. So, in principle, it happened. It is enough to look at Clinton's squalor with her "I will wipe Russia off the face of the earth." There are no more great politicians in the West, only hysterics, liars and murderers.
    1. Ingvar 72
      Ingvar 72 1 November 2016 08: 02
      Quote: USSR 1971
      There are no more great politicians in the west, only hysterics, liars and murderers.

      As the former German chancellor (in my opinion Helmut Schmidt) said - "Charles de Gaulle was the last independent politician in Europe."
    2. maks-101
      maks-101 1 November 2016 08: 07
      What drives the west, the thirst for profit, they plunder like locusts and plunder the states and fly to the next field. Two or three generations we were able to live without a big war, we will have to fight again as our grandfathers and great-grandfathers. My blood will hit my veins when they show children killed and maimed in Syria and other hot spots in the world.
  2. parusnik
    parusnik 1 November 2016 07: 57
    it is already impossible in principle to regain its former respect for the UN mechanism
    ... That's for sure. A phrase from the movie "Afonya":
    “You don't know what the UN decided about Honduras there?”
    - Who is he? ... just a prophetic ...
  3. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 1 November 2016 08: 00
    This means that an urgent need is being formed for a new, more efficient, system.
    Everything is correct. It would be interesting to know, are there any "advances" in the creation of this new system? Probably not...
    1. Aleksander
      Aleksander 1 November 2016 11: 47
      Quote: LÄRZ
      This means that an urgent need for a new, more efficient system is being formed. Everything is correct. It would be interesting to know, are there any "advances" in the creation of this new system? Probably not...

      Do not need. The author is talking nonsense. The United Nations, the UN Security Council with the veto power of its permanent members were plagued by tens of millions of victims of WWII and WWII. This is a mechanism to avoid war, and it generally works.
      There will not be such a place in the new Russian system, with the right of veto!
      1. Alex_1973
        Alex_1973 1 November 2016 15: 47
        The United Nations, the UN Security Council with the veto power of its permanent members were plagued by tens of millions of victims of WWII and WWII.
        Alexander, to be precise, after the WWI the League of Nations was formed, which rested in the Bose exactly before WWII. And paradoxically, the situation was almost one on one with modern realities. The USSR was in fact expelled from the League of Nations. So nothing lasts forever under the moon and the UN really turned into a farce. On Yugoslavia, Iraq or Libya, were there any resolutions? No, the mattress covers completely dispensed with them, spitting and rubbing international law. So the UN is already dead in fact and I'm afraid that a clash in one form or another between Russia and NATO is inevitable. History, as you know, has the property of repeating itself! Yours faithfully! hi
        1. Aleksander
          Aleksander 1 November 2016 16: 19
          Quote: Alex_1973
          to be precise, after the WWII the League of Nations was formed, which rested in the Bose exactly before WWII. And paradoxically, the situation was almost one on one with modern realities. The USSR was in fact expelled from the League of Nations.

          The situation was fundamentally different: Russia, due to the Brest Bolshevik shame, was deprived of the role that it received at the UN after the Victory.
          And without Russia, the largest European power, there can be no peace in Europe. Therefore, WWII happened (Russia was not in the leading roles in the League), therefore there are no 70 years now (Russia in the UN Security Council). Therefore, the UN must be preserved.
          If there is LON (League of Nations. Nations), then Russia will not have the right to veto there. And when he is not there, then the contradictions will move from the UN to the battlefield. They will not disappear, and only the right of veto forced the Powers to seek a mutually acceptable compromise, IMHO.
          Best regards hi
          1. Alex_1973
            Alex_1973 1 November 2016 16: 27
            If there is LON (League of Nations. Nations), then Russia will not have the right to veto there. And when he is not there, then the contradictions will move from the UN to the battlefield.
            Alexander, if my memory serves me, then in Yugoslavia we vetoed or am I mistaken? But in any case, mattress covers bypass any resolution even with a veto, when it is beneficial for them, there are plenty of examples.
            I am not saying that such an organization is not needed, but the UN is already dead and needs to be reincarnated. And this, unfortunately, is only through a clash. There are no other options in my opinion. God grant that I was wrong ...!
  4. Blondy
    Blondy 1 November 2016 08: 55
    Oh, men, you don’t have to switch to a new system. In history, this always happened after such perturbations. Better with the shitty old one.
  5. then
    then 1 November 2016 09: 06
    The modern UN, more and more resembles the League of Nations before the war, in which the USSR is accused of all sins.
  6. masiya
    masiya 1 November 2016 09: 15
    Western leaders present at the UN have earned this badge of honor:
  7. rasteer
    rasteer 1 November 2016 09: 28
    On the one hand, this is kind of good, since all, even local, conflicts are becoming more destructive and bloody.
    Something the author kindly beguiled with evil.
    Although perhaps the article was paid for by the American military-industrial complex.
  8. cedar
    cedar 1 November 2016 10: 20
    This is a coma not of the Yalta world, but of the capitalist one, which has finally become sleepy with thirst for profit and is always full of energy, obsessed with the rate of profit, for the sake of which he goes to any attacks, as the history of mankind shows.
    See the root.
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 3 November 2016 23: 12
      Once again, with regret, we see how stupid humanity is, every time we need a global shake-up to think and try to start with a white sheet ... and then again a rake! If you dream up and look at our civilization from the side, I would destroy it and free the planet from such parasites.
  9. antivirus
    antivirus 1 November 2016 10: 40
    "Shaped" and "shaped"; what is the difference?
    Who forms: M Zakharova or 10 thousand cleaners of factory locker rooms across the country?
    Has the idea taken over the masses or are the personal interests of a few prevailing (through the media)?
    The cycle of the life of a generation will go to the formation of a new world order.
    What event to start the countdown from?
  10. Landing Station6
    Landing Station6 1 November 2016 11: 40
    Unfortunately, we live in a situation where a simple shutdown of e \ energy for a month will lead to mass disaster. There will be no heat, food, transport, and most importantly WATER. Although there is a positive for Russia, in our country almost every inhabitant can independently grow, preserve and plant plant and animal food for the next period.
  11. uskrabut
    uskrabut 1 November 2016 11: 48
    If present-day Ukraine is a permanent member of the UN Security Council, the UN really needs reform. And how many different kinds of mongrels who are barking to the West at the UN? And where are the containment mechanisms for overperforming countries like the United States?
    So we need a new system, oh how you need it!
  12. iouris
    iouris 1 November 2016 12: 39
    The essence of the Yalta Agreements is the recognition of the historical role of the USSR and Stalin (or vice versa), as an alternative US center. After the occupation of Germany and Japan, the destruction of the British Empire, the arrival of American TNCs in the Chinese market, the Yalta system of the United States is no longer needed. However, a super empire with a center in Washington turned out to be poorly managed and economically not very inefficient. The total debt of the United States by the end of the Obama presidency will reach 20 trillion. Most likely, this means a war with creditors.
  13. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 1 November 2016 14: 37
    And again, our boys to educate all this shoblu for the next 70 years? Well, where is the truth?
  14. akudr48
    akudr48 1 November 2016 16: 08
    After reading the text, I remembered
    "what we have, we do not keep; when we lose, we cry."

    Somehow, the author easily distributed earrings to all sisters (sworn partners), showed that Russia was being offended and concluded that the time had come for the public destruction of the UN, accompanying this time with a fine decent fight that could not be avoided.

    But the place received from the USSR in the UN Security Council along with the veto rule on voting - this still preserves for Russia the last signs of a great power.

    We should not give up these higher international powers (which many powerful countries only dream of), but understand the reasons for those minor inconveniences when Poland and Ukraine and other great limitrophies speak against us at the UN.

    And to make sure that they do not speak out, for which, besides a place in the UN and a vote in the Security Council, the need is also strength - economic, financial, technological, informational and, yes, military, with which we have big problems. It's not like stagnation - a backward movement is taking place, accompanied by unprecedented theft from the so-called the elite.

    Therefore, people are so systematically taken away from the internal agenda, where all issues are directly related to the standard of living of people, on an international platform, they explain to us that we are all gored, if anything, in Syria, Ukraine, the Baltic states, Poles and others European lads, and also not give in to Great Satan from across the ocean.

    Therefore, it is necessary to deal seriously with the development of the country and its internal problems, then the howling of big jackals and howling of various trifles, even from the UN rostrum, even from under the rostrum, will not cause any emotions. Not up to them.
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 1 November 2016 17: 08
      I completely agree. Foreign policies are filled to capacity all SMRAD, and most of the Russian belong to the western dodgers. People are being led away, oh, they are being led away from the internal situation, and under the guise of obscurantist liberals, led by a thieves ’foodstuff, they will steal our Power and have no time to blink an eye.
  15. TOR2
    TOR2 1 November 2016 21: 42
    The history of the Yalta world definitely ends. The United Nations, created to ensure stability and security in it, no longer performs both of these functions.

    But can it be otherwise. We have repeatedly read their comments. They are all from the top to the average layman sure of victory.
  16. Old warrior
    Old warrior 1 November 2016 22: 57
    Everything is very simple: only Russia SHOULD decide what and how to do the rest of the wild World. There will be no problems right away. This western monkey herd was isolated to complete self-abasement. Phew! Throw the byak ... and kick in the ass ...
  17. Rostislav
    Rostislav 3 November 2016 16: 38
    The author is right, the UN has long turned into a simple talking shop and it is time to end this "circus". NOT necessarily with a fight, as the author believes. The League of Nations quietly ended its days.