Regards to the partisans

65
The United States does not have a land border with Russia, but there is a sea border in the Bering Strait, on the far periphery of both countries, between Alaska and Chukotka. The main thing, as in the old joke, the United States with whom they want, is bordering, and in this case it is completely in line with reality.

The United States has the second largest personnel in the world and, as is commonly believed, the strongest in terms of combat potential of the armed forces. The American military industrial complex is capable of producing weapons and military equipment of all classes in virtually any quantities. The share of foreign models in the US Armed Forces does not constitute even one percent, and even these models are manufactured in the United States under foreign licenses.



US forces are recruited for hire, which is considered their most important advantage. Although in fact it represents their main problem, since the content of the Armed Forces catastrophically increases the cost of the Armed Forces, reducing actual combat capability. Formally, the military call in the country is not canceled, but annually declared zero.

The supreme military body of the US armed forces is the Chiefs of Staff Committee (CLS). It includes the chairman, deputy chief of staff of the ground forces, air force, navy, commandant of the marines. KNSH carries out operational strategic planning, is responsible for the organization of combat training, personnel training, and ensuring the combat readiness of air force groups in the theater of operations.

The highest operational and strategic units of the US Armed Forces are joint commands. In their operational submission are all units and units of all types of armed forces outside the United States and part of the forces on their own territory, including the strategic nuclear forces. Currently, there are three target (strategic, MTR, strategic redeployment) and six territorial combined commands.

The strategic command (headquarters - on the VVB Offut, Nebraska) includes the space command of the ground forces, the space command and command of the global strikes of the Air Force, command of the forces fleet Navy, cyber command (it includes the 2nd Army of the Ground Forces, the command of intelligence and security of the Ground Forces, the 24th Air Force of the Air Force, the 10th Fleet of the Navy).

The MTR command (Mack Dill, Florida) includes the MTR command of the ground forces, air force, navy, marines, the combined command of the MTR (it includes the Delta special forces unit, support and reconnaissance units).

The strategic redeployment command (Scott, Illinois) includes the command of an air force transfer, the command of sea transport, the command of accommodation and distribution, and an integrated center for the support of air transfer. This command is different from the rest of the fact that it consists mainly of civilian structures (with the exception of the command of an air force transfer of the Air Force). Thus, the command of maritime transport includes transport vessels (either assigned to the Navy or chartered), the combined center of the air transfer provides, in particular, the rental of transport aircraft from civilian airlines.

Territorial joint commands exist in a number of the largest armed forces (Russia, China, India), but everywhere areas of responsibility do not extend beyond the borders of these countries. The US Armed Forces are the only ones whose territorial command areas cover the whole world.

Regards to the partisansThe Northern Command (headquarters - Peterson, Colorado) is responsible for the United States itself (except for Hawaii), Canada, Mexico and the adjacent waters. Includes 5-th field army (PA) of the ground forces, 1-th BA Air Force, the command of the forces of the Navy fleet, the command of the reserve of the marines (4-I division).

Southern Command (Doral, Miami, Florida) covers Latin America (except Mexico and the United States-owned Puerto Rico Island) and the adjacent waters. Includes the 6-th PA of the ground forces, the 12-th BA Air Force, the 4-th operational fleet of the Navy, the components of the marines and the SSO, the base "Guantanamo".

European command (Stuttgart, Germany) knows not only the part of the world with the same name. In his area of ​​responsibility, the entire territory of Russia, the Caucasus, Turkey, Israel, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Atlantic. Includes ground forces (7-I PA) and Air Force (3-IА) in Europe, 6-th Navy operational fleet.

Pacific Command (Camp Smith, Hawaii) is responsible for Hawaii, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, China, Taiwan, Mongolia, both Korea, Japan, ASEAN countries, Australia and Oceania, Antarctica, almost the entire adjacent area. Includes Pacific Army and Air Force, Pacific Fleet (3 and 7 th operational fleets), 1 and 3 th divisions of the Marine Corps.

Central Command (Mac Dill, Florida) covers Egypt, the Middle East (up to and including Pakistan, without Israel and Turkey), Central Asia. Includes 3-th PA PA ground forces, temporary components of the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, SSO.

The African Command (Stuttgart, Germany) controls the Black Continent (except Egypt) and the adjacent waters. It includes the 2 th brigade of the 1 th infantry division of the ground forces (deployed in Fort-Riley, Kansas), the 3 th Air Force (in fact, part of the Air Force Command in Europe), components of the Navy, Marines, MTR.

The US Armed Forces are built on the basis of global domination, but in fact they are not solving this task at the moment, which, as stated above, is primarily due to the principle of recruitment. Since money can be killed, but it is impossible to die, a hired army has to be built in such a way as to fight without losses, that is, to have absolute technological superiority over the enemy. This leads to a tremendous increase in expenditures on both the maintenance of personnel and on weapons and military equipment, while the Americans are simply not ready to fight differently. Accordingly, if there is no overwhelming superiority over any opponent (Russia, China), or it somehow bypasses its lag (through the massive use of people and equipment, even outdated, like the DPRK and Iran, or through the use of partisan methods), the Americans fight will not. Although the US society and the army have not yet reached the European state of complete inability to conduct any military operations, the corresponding trends are obvious, which already has quite specific manifestations in the sphere of geopolitics. As the examples of Georgia, Ukraine, Turkey, the Syrian "moderate opposition", the Kurds show, to be friends with the USA and hope for their military assistance - to doom themselves to a catastrophe. In the foreseeable future, Taiwanese will be convinced of the suicide of the alliance with the United States, and their experience will be the saddest. This is not propaganda, this is a statement of facts. Propaganda, including our own, just prevents us from seeing these facts, telling about the absolute invincibility of the American weapons and impeccable splendor of a professional army.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    30 October 2016 05: 51
    In Detroid, the last Abrams factory closed.
    1. +7
      30 October 2016 06: 51
      Amen. Although it’s too early to rejoice .. It really is what they want and will do in any quantity ... except for fighting spirit of course.
    2. +2
      30 October 2016 07: 49
      Quote: Danil Larionov
      In Detroid, the last Abrams factory closed.

      On this occasion, I propose to put the inflatable models "R-36 Satan on Ratmanov Island".
      1. +4
        30 October 2016 11: 50
        Quote: Amurets
        On this occasion, I propose to put the inflatable models "R-36 Satan on Ratmanov Island".



        Here, Americans do not get off with inflatable toys ...

        US military bases in Alaska

        - Elmendorf - US Air Force Headquarters in Alaska, F-15 aircraft.
        In Almendorf, the Alaskan Command of the US Armed Forces, the 11th Air Army, the Alaskan Command Zone of NORAD, the 4th Brigade Tactical Group of the 25th Infantry Division, the 673rd Airfield Maintenance Base, the 3rd Wing, the Alaskan Army, the United Operational Group are located Alaska, the 381st reconnaissance squadron.
        - Shemaya-16th Air Force Observation Squadron.
        - Kodiak-missile base.
        - Fort Grills-PRO.
        - Gakhon is something very secret ("microwave", climate weapon ???).
        - Fairbanks Air Force.
        - Ladd Air Force.
        - Eyemon Air Force.
        - Ayelson-Air Force.
        - Cold Bay Navy.
        - Dutch Harbor Navy.
        - Bay Cold-Navy.
        - Fort Richardson near Engrich is a military police skier training base.

        Russian Defense Ministry Shoigu has already said that 86 km from Alaska, in Chukotka, a new Russian military base will be formed by 2018, the basis of which will be a new coastal defense division, similar to the 126th coastal defense brigade, based in Crimea. In the northern latitudes, such units did not exist before.
        1. +1
          30 October 2016 13: 11
          Well, from about. Ratmanov is only 35 km there, so the range is not enough, so if only shoot through the South Pole. And the Americans removed the naval base from Dutch - Harbor, I can’t find the link when they mothballed the base
    3. +1
      30 October 2016 08: 09
      And why should they produce abramas in the Detoroid? They perfectly produce verbal diarrhea and have already drowned everyone and everything in it. As practice shows, a vaccine against vaccination of democracy is a rare, expensive and very dubious thing.
      1. +3
        30 October 2016 22: 44
        What are you arguing about?
        Since 1995, the tank has not been produced. The only tank plant in the US, the Detroit Arsenal plant in Detroit is closed and demolished. Currently, deep modernization of existing Abrams tanks of all modifications is underway at the Lima Tank Plant in Lima, Ohio, owned by General Dynamics. The plant is experiencing significant financial difficulties; in 2013, the option of temporary closure until 2017 was discussed
    4. 0
      30 October 2016 08: 44
      And for a long time already
    5. +3
      30 October 2016 09: 50
      Quote: Danil Larionov
      In Detroid, the last Abrams factory closed.

      In Detroit wink
      The Americans have not made Abrams for a long time. They either modernize early modifications, or they completely take out the remnants from the battlefield and if something else needs to be restored, they restore and modernize again. They have two factories on the territory of the States - on one, everything is disassembled and cleaned to the screws, on the other everything is assembled and modernized. Yes So quantify the volume of tanks at the same level. It can only differ qualitatively, through the emergence of new modifications. So if you want to reduce the number of "Abramchs" in the American army, you need to either leave the battlefield for yourself, or destroy it so that it cannot be restored hi
      1. 0
        30 October 2016 23: 11
        after the second Iraqi company "irrevocably broke" (or rather disappeared), every fifth abrams then it was 2300 pieces.
        since then, the Abrams have also been "irretrievably broken" in Afghanistan in the Iraqi and Saudi armies.
        and this is despite the factories.
      2. 0
        1 November 2016 15: 35
        So yes: the ability of American industry to restore Abrams from melted and pretty torn full rubbish has always surprised me. Directly not "Abrams", but "Phoenix" of some kind! belay
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +1
      30 October 2016 13: 58
      In Detroid, the last Abrams factory closed.


      And then what are they doing at the armored factories in Texas, do they have the same factories in other states? Some Israeli armored vehicles are being made in the USA.
      And a couple of years ago there was an article (maybe even here) where it was written that the US Congress actually forced to produce and buy Abrams for the US Army, so as not to close the plant (the plant was definitely not in Detroit), and since the US Army these tanks were not need them immediately sent for storage
    8. 0
      1 November 2016 14: 18
      The plant was closed due to uselessness. Tanks made all the storage tanks. And the modernization plants are operating, no one has closed them.
  2. +6
    30 October 2016 06: 11
    In Afghanistan, the Americans still can not do anything with the Taliban ... it's like a war with windmills ... and super-duper weapons do not help against an enemy who knows where and in an unknown quantity with their rules of war .... stuck for a long time .

    Wherever an adversary forces the US Army to impose their rules of confrontation, Americans are defeated everywhere.
    Further, after the defeat of the army of Saakashvili, trained and equipped by the Americans, I became convinced that the strength of the army is not only in armament but also in motivation.

    The motivation of the Georgians to kill and rob civilians of TSKHINVALI killed them.

    The same will be with American mercenaries in other hot spots on the planet.
    1. +1
      30 October 2016 08: 51
      He fought and tore all.
      PMCs were created. And although they crawl around the planet like lice, they haven’t played anywhere else. As long as there is a printing press, this is a serious force. I think that Georgia was overestimated in the USA, but we were not overestimated, and the transience of the war did not allow us to transfer PMCs.
      However, PMCs may have been created for dirty work, and not for hard military labor.
    2. +4
      30 October 2016 09: 58
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      In Afghanistan, the Americans still can not do anything with the Taliban ... it's like a war with windmills ... and super-duper weapons do not help against an enemy who knows where and in an unknown quantity with their rules of war .... stuck for a long time .

      And they climbed into Afghanistan because the Taliban nullified the production of drugs. After the appearance of the Americans there, drug production has grown significantly - and this is the shadow babosy for their dark affairs, and in fact the killing of the population of the countries where they are delivered. request
      So the Americans after Yugoslavia saw that the enemy was gone and started: Provocation 9.11 (they took down unprofitable skyscrapers with a rocket on the Pentagon, then they got into Afghanistan, where the Taliban turned off the drug production by their principles, then they got into Iraq oil and wreaking havoc. But it’s important that the military-industrial complex receives grandiose arms contracts, the dollar rules America, and as long as America exists, there will be constant wars, for wars bring money Yes hi
      1. +3
        30 October 2016 10: 50
        This is a stupid myth, the Taliban grew it up well and constantly increased supplies, the failure in production was only in the year of the invasion.
        1. +10
          30 October 2016 11: 56
          I ask the moderators not to delete my commentary addressed to BlackMokona, which provided a course from the deportation of the CSS from the NSSR, AND HOW TO THE ACCOUNT OF USING THE FLIT TO THE BEACH OF BELARUS ??? and even cleaner, you BlackMokona just jeni psaki !!!!
      2. 0
        30 October 2016 23: 21
        Please do not listen to the media. In Afghanistan, the Americans are only at their bases. so that the Taliban can’t be restricted. . hence the conclusion there is an agreement. and the constant increase in the production of drugs with its transportation on US aircraft only confirms that the Taliban are US pawns, or rather, its special offices.
    3. +7
      30 October 2016 10: 14
      at the expense of Afghanistan, there they settled down to guard the poppy plantaries, the famous Indo-Chinese drug triangle in the drug business is a pale tarakos compared to what is now rushing from Afghanistan, and this "located in an unknown place and in an unknown quantity" is superfluous. everyone knows everything and about everything, another thing is the protection of a red-homogeneous allotment, this is of paramount importance for mattresses, and then private traders at the very time, all that is business, "and the wolves are safe and the rams are fed" in contrast to the famous saying where everything is per turn
      1. 0
        30 October 2016 13: 18
        Quote: Crimean partisan 1974
        , and then there are private traders at the right time, everything is business, "and the wolves are safe and the rams are fed", in contrast to the famous saying where everything is on the contrary

        Partisan! You did not specify who are the wolves and who are the rams?
        1. 0
          4 November 2016 19: 58
          Partisan! You did not specify who are the wolves and who are the rams?
          very much even clarified, depending on the harvest, REDRELLESI-if the yield of "delights" falls, then they blame private security firms, if the increase is "WHAT IS A THREAD TO BOMB" - that is, there is the importance of the presence of real aircraft from a saw-cut budget, then e- "and wolves safe and and and the rams are fed "
    4. +1
      30 October 2016 15: 17
      They do not set themselves the task of defeating the Taliban. They control them and at the right time send them to the south of Russia.
  3. +1
    30 October 2016 06: 12
    talking about the absolute invincibility of American weapons and the impeccable splendor of a professional army.

    Over the past, or rather the extreme, years, the question of the actual state of the "exceptional" army has become very serious. One is Hollywood and the media, another is what is actually being done. Starting from the psychological, moral state of the Merikatos army, to the adoption and development of new weapons.
  4. +2
    30 October 2016 06: 54
    The United States, with whom they want, borders on that

    I really liked it. A few words reflect the essence of US policy. +
  5. +12
    30 October 2016 07: 10
    To be friends with the United States and hope for their military assistance is to doom oneself to disaster.

    1. Cat
      0
      30 October 2016 07: 28
      What is the strength of a brother, in truth!

      Future partisans.
      1. +3
        30 October 2016 10: 30
        yeah, according to the criterion — WHAT NEXT IN THE FOREST THOSE THICKER PARTISANS —this louore of the Shnobnel Peace Prize, I urged in my CRIMEA to shoot a couple of dozen thermonuclear megatons according to the drop shot plan
  6. +2
    30 October 2016 07: 16
    Stupid article. Trying to convince Americans of worthlessness. Yes, they will fight only with the wrong hands, especially in partisan warfare. What is the problem of driving hundreds of thousands, or even millions of unemployed Arabs, Indians, blacks and others? Yes, for 1-2 thousand dollars they will roll the neck of any country! And they don’t need to be provided with particularly sophisticated equipment - an assault rifle, a grenade launcher, a machine gun and intelligence information that will be given to them. But in Russia in general it’s enough to capture a fairly comfortable European part and that’s it. Siberia, the North and the Far East will themselves fall into their own hands due to lack of supply.
    1. +15
      30 October 2016 08: 02
      kuz363, you are the wrong Kazakh fool
      Russia is a guarantee of your existence. Russia saved you from destruction, already from 1740
      And the Urals and Siberia and the Far East will never "fall" into the hands of any "warrior". We can be killed, but not conquered. But it is not easy to kill us either. Learn History. hi
    2. +5
      30 October 2016 08: 38
      Quote: kuz363
      especially in guerrilla warfare. What a problem to drive hundreds of thousands

      The concept of "DRIVE" is contrary to the principle of the GUERRILLA war.
      You can drive mercenaries, punishers, but no how, not partisans.
      1. +3
        30 October 2016 10: 10
        You can drive mercenaries, punishers, but no how, not partisans.

        And in this I completely agree with you.
        It is difficult to explain to anyone who does not understand the essence and foundations of guerrilla warfare.
      2. 0
        30 October 2016 22: 16
        Quote: igordok
        Quote: kuz363
        especially in guerrilla warfare. What a problem to drive hundreds of thousands

        The concept of "DRIVE" is contrary to the principle of the GUERRILLA war.
        You can drive mercenaries, punishers, but no how, not partisans.
        1. +2
          30 October 2016 22: 26
          Sudoplatov would argue with your statement that, like those hundreds of deputy party district committees whose job description obliged them to remain behind enemy lines and organize underground and partisan activities
    3. +5
      30 October 2016 09: 47
      oh mother, but they poor striped fellows wanted the Crimea, and in February 2014 Crimea not only bent over the pakemrons and gave pendal over the rolls, but also all the scum of the Natevs, Duc Crimea is a piece of land, and the Trans-Urals ... . it seems that kuz363 has problems in mathematics, tyk skat- "yadochkrymskogo officer"
    4. +7
      30 October 2016 10: 00
      Quote: kuz363
      What is the problem of driving hundreds of thousands, or even millions of unemployed Arabs, Indians, blacks and others? Yes, for 1-2 thousand dollars they will roll the neck of any country! And they don’t need to be provided with particularly sophisticated equipment - an assault rifle, a grenade launcher, a machine gun and intelligence information that will be given to them. But in Russia in general it’s enough to capture a fairly comfortable European part and that’s it. Siberia, the North and the Far East will themselves fall into their own hands due to lack of supply.

      Are you raving?
      Arabs and Indians in the snow of the North and Siberia? In - 30 degrees of frost and waist-deep in snow? winked belay
      FSE, I don’t know how to go further with this laughing
      1. +3
        30 October 2016 10: 48
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Arabs and Indians in the snow of the North and Siberia? In - 30 degrees of frost and waist-deep in snow?

        Quote: kuz363
        But in Russia in general it’s enough to capture a fairly comfortable European part and that’s it. Siberia, the North and the Far East will themselves fall into their own hands due to lack of supply.


        Unfortunately survive! We have one dad, a military attache from Mali teaches his son in FOCU, and there are so many cadets from Southern countries
        But kuz363 is not right about the supply from the European part of Russia. Everything grows in the south of the Far East, fish and meat are also their own. Fruits and berries come from China and Southeast Asia, it is much cheaper than transporting it from the western part of Russia. All major mineral deposits are also beyond the Urals. So we will live.
        1. +1
          30 October 2016 11: 55
          Quote: Amurets
          But kuz363 is not right about the supply from the European part of Russia.



          He probably meant the supply of OUR troops and ... partisans ... (???)
        2. +6
          30 October 2016 11: 56
          Quote: Amurets
          Unfortunately survive! We have one dad, a military attache from Mali teaches his son in FOCU, and there are so many cadets from Southern countries

          So the same cadets! On state security!
          And here?
          Who will wear these bearded homeless beheaded shoes? There is no money for boots, quilted jackets and skis for sponsors is not enough)))
          They are in Syria in shirts and shales running barefoot, and in the conditions of the North this army will freeze in the winter, and in the summer it will be eaten by a mosquito, midges and midges.
    5. +2
      30 October 2016 14: 09
      Well, they have already done this with Europe, it remains to equip the wounded, but you are mistaken about the comfortable European part of Russia. 50 km from every million-plus city, and that’s all, paragraph, not comfort - civilization is ending
    6. 0
      1 November 2016 15: 52
      The delusionalness of your calculation about the usefulness of hordes of Arabs or Negroes was very well refuted even by the British, and the French and Dutch, in the 17-19 centuries, when even then, not very high-quality (by today's standards, of course) weapons, their army, well-trained and united units milled whole hordes of natives into dust. Of the same Negro tribes, few were able to fight at least somehow qualitatively. The assessment of these opponents as fighters was well laid out by Kipling.

      FUZZI-VUZZI (Sudanese expeditionary units)
      We knew the enemy for every taste:
      Who is brave, who is flimsy, as a sin
      But there was no coward Afghan and Zulus
      And Fuzzy-Wozzie - this one was worth all!
      He didn’t want to give up, even kill
      He mowed the sentries without respite,
      Sowing in the thicket, spoiling the horses
      And he played with the army like a cat and mouse.

      For your health, Fuzzy, for Sudan, your country,
      First-class, naked nakedness, you were a warrior in battle!
      We’ll straighten the soldier’s ticket for you,
      And you want to stretch your legs, so sign on it!

      Khyber Pass drove us into sweat
      A fool, a mile, spanked us a drill
      Frost beneath Burma’s sun
      The dashing Zulus plucked like hens,
      But Fuzzy was an expert on every count,
      And no matter how doldonized in the newspapers
      "The fighters do not retreat a single step!" -
      He clobbered us this way and that.

      For your health, Fuzzy, for your spouse and guys!
      There was an order to end you, we managed to do it right.
      A rifle against a bow is not fair to call a game,
      But you broke all the trump cards and broke through the British system!
      ...
  7. +19
    30 October 2016 07: 17
    Well what can I say? All this has been known for a long time.
    ************
    The opinion of one of the employees of Blackwater about the combat effectiveness of different countries. Blackwater ("Black Water") is an American security company (private military company), founded in 1997 by Eric Prince and Al Clark.

    1. African tribes.
    It’s not even interesting to fight them. They shoot randomly, they don’t know about targeted shooting. Often they spar into the ground under their feet. It’s a common thing to get into one’s own. Run to the sides after several casualties or a shot from the tank.
    Rating - meat.
    2. African regulars.
    They differ from their wild counterparts only in the presence of uniforms and modest skills of aimed shooting. Fighting against savages, but a clash with a more skilled opponent, even the Arabs, leads them to panic and flight. Act in harmony with armored vehicles do not know how, in principle.
    Rating - meat in the package.
    3. Arabs.
    Mercenaries, rebels, many regulars ... The concepts of tactics and strategies for them are as far away as frost for an African. Their war is to shoot cartridges of ammunition towards the enemy, while calling in the bar and periodically blowing themselves up with everything that comes into the genus of the hand. However, the latter does not apply to regulars, they are relatively silent and disciplined, they know how to use grenades.
    Rating is a convenient target.
    4. American regulars.
    How many films were made about the invincible American army ... There is only one BUT. The Yankees absolutely do not know how to fight without artillery training, tanks and airstrikes. If the territory has not been scorched to a state of a deserted desert, the soldiers will not go there. And if they go, then they don’t come back. They shoot very well, perfectly coordinated, but they are shy in front of any resistance. Then they become easy prey. Losses are going through hard, up to a complete loss of combat effectiveness. Underpants.
    Rating - biting dogs.
    5. American mercenaries.
    Nice fighters. They are able to act both as a team and alone, beautiful arrows. There are desperate individuals with whom it is sometimes difficult to cope. But they have a very weak point - morality. And the lack of motivation, except money. The corpse does not need money, so most of them do not go where it is very hot, and, accordingly, in every possible way avoid the first line of fire.
    Dogs of war, if evaluated.
    6. Asians.
    I did not encounter regulars. Mercenaries are capable of delivering an excruciating headache to any enemy. If acting as a group. What is in their head is unclear, but they are capable of any recklessness. They shoot beautifully, often act from an ambush into which the enemy falls according to a cunning plan. Asians do not give a damn about the support of equipment, aircraft and shells. They do not care if there are cartridges or not. The main thing is the presence of brothers. But alone, alas, they become useless.
    Rating - the army of the emperor.
    7. Caucasians and Afghans.
    Strong warriors. Fine arrows. Hardy, brave.
    They know how to act in groups, alone, motivated and insidious. In battle, they act competently, they know how to tactics and strategy. They are not afraid of equipment and airstrikes, they act effectively from ambushes.
    They have the only weak point - they are unable to fight to the last breath, a rare fighter is able to sacrifice himself for the sake of a common victory. Unless he is a martyr, but that’s a completely different story ...
    Rating - real fighters.
    8. Russians.
    To counteract a platoon of Russian mercenaries - a fierce, bloody piz ... ec. They fight to the end, to the last bullet, and when the ammunition runs out - they use everything that is at hand. Mortally wounded a Russian? Do not touch it, most likely before death - he clamped a grenade without a check. Russians are inventive, have great intuition. And ... spit on everything. Has the plane arrived? It’s okay, they’ll knock down a sapper blade. Tank? It's okay if your hands are not broken. Fighters who have never held SVD at a critical moment are able to get out of it at the limit of range. Was this the last cartridge? They will beat the enemy with the rifle itself. Tactics and strategy? Easy! Any composition, from the army to the half-dead cripple, holding alone the company of the enemy. Russians, even mercenaries, are unable to retreat. And if you retreat - be sure, they just run after the cartridges.
    Rating - Warriors.
    **************
    And there’s nothing to add to this (almost). hi
    1. +13
      30 October 2016 10: 00
      there is Major General Friedrich von Mellenthin "the presence of bridgeheads in the hands of the Russian troops has always created a serious danger. Those who are complacent about the existing bridgeheads and delaying their liquidation are deeply mistaken. Russian bridgeheads, no matter how small and harmless they may seem, can in a short time time to become powerful and dangerous pockets of resistance, and then turn into impregnable fortified areas.Any Russian bridgehead captured by a company in the evening is necessarily held in the morning by at least a regiment, and over the next night it turns into a formidable fortress, well supplied with heavy weapons and everything necessary for No, not even a hurricane of artillery fire will force the Russians to abandon the bridgehead created overnight. Success can only bring a well-prepared offensive. This principle of the Russians "have bridgeheads everywhere" is a very serious danger and should not be underestimated "
      1 to 40 is normal, a dot on Mother Earth against everything NATE is normal, Tartus is normal, NO EXCEPT US is normal
    2. +3
      30 October 2016 10: 09
      It seems to me that the native language of the interviewee is Russian. But everything, in general, is. With the exception of clause 6, the last Japanese soldier, calling on WWII, laid down his arms five years ago, somewhere in the forests of Indonesia, and then, he had to look for one of his commanders in Japan, whom he knew by sight (the Japanese are a nation of centenarians). Only after the order did he consider it possible to declare himself a non-combatant! P. 8., Everything is so, but ..... over each warrior - a pyramid of officials. Although what I mean, it's about mercenaries ...
      1. +3
        30 October 2016 11: 41
        Although what I mean, it's about mercenaries ...

        yeah, and the mercenaries are even worse, corporations that want the mercenary to "move in" - it is this circumstance that every mercenary manages to avoid without getting into a specific meat grinder, and the person is motivated, "THAT ONE, AND WHO IS BUT ME" - this is how it is gritted, and the whole point
        1. +1
          30 October 2016 12: 45
          Even misunderstood the meaning of the statement, I meant that "set a task for the Russian military, appoint a competent commander, remove the near-war cattle from above - and that's it," Mars is our ", nobody will stop us. In principle, this applies to any sphere of human life. Regarding mercenaries; it is a generally accepted fact: Russian military experts are the best in the world, well, like: "for one Russian, three non-Russians are given" :)
      2. 0
        30 October 2016 12: 33
        Quote: 3x3zsave
        everything is so, but ..... over each warrior - a pyramid of officials.

        I’ll fix it a bit. We are talking about an ordinary fighter. (from a soldier to a major, well, maybe even a clandestine). Which official intervenes in the work of the group, platoon, company, when even art does not reach you (this is more than 20 km), I mean the regiment. When there is no connection. If an official appears in such a situation, I think the first shot will be him)))) Yes, and where he will appear from there, where from the chair with the phone.
        1. +1
          30 October 2016 13: 23
          In turn, a little fix. I meant the global situation, not the situational one. A vivid example, of blessed memory, Colonel Budanov. The commander saved the subordinates, they shot the sniper, (I think the majority on this site will be able to identify the sniper among, like, civilians). As a result: Budanov in prison, after - in the grave; his superiors are in more spacious offices. But Budanov at least made the decision. But the senior lieutenant V. (I do not remember the name, I will not lie) was directly ordered to shoot the car. Remember this story?
          1. 0
            30 October 2016 17: 39
            Arakcheev? or was there one more, with a German surname, began with "L"?
            1. 0
              30 October 2016 20: 20
              Are you joking? In vain
              1. 0
                30 October 2016 21: 27
                Not at all, Not either Lachman, not Lindeman, something like that. It was during the first Chechen one. So what about the banter - it's you by.
                1. 0
                  30 October 2016 21: 37
                  The surname really was German, but the episode described happened even after the liberation of Budanov, either in the 10th, or in the 11th
                  1. 0
                    30 October 2016 22: 13
                    Maybe in the second Chechen, but it was during the hostilities, and in 10 -11 there were no large-scale actions
                    1. 0
                      30 October 2016 23: 01
                      And there were no large-scale actions, there was a special forces operation to liquidate the center for the training of shahid women, and the media became interested in the case thanks to the "left-wing activists" (like, the Russian military is killing civilians)
          2. +1
            1 November 2016 15: 39
            Remember. Captain Ullman.
            1. 0
              4 November 2016 13: 35
              Yes Ullman, thanks for reminding me
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +1
    30 October 2016 14: 34
    Quote: The same Lech
    In Afghanistan, the Americans still can not do anything with the Taliban ... it's like a war with windmills ... and super-duper weapons do not help against an enemy who knows where and in an unknown quantity with their rules of war .... stuck for a long time .

    Wherever an adversary forces the US Army to impose their rules of confrontation, Americans are defeated everywhere.
    Further, after the defeat of the army of Saakashvili, trained and equipped by the Americans, I became convinced that the strength of the army is not only in armament but also in motivation.

    The motivation of the Georgians to kill and rob civilians of TSKHINVALI killed them.

    The same will be with American mercenaries in other hot spots on the planet.

    ..Tskhinval .. That’s important ..
  10. +3
    30 October 2016 15: 05
    Quote: Mavrikiy
    He fought and tore all.
    PMCs were created. And although they crawl around the planet like lice, they haven’t played anywhere else. As long as there is a printing press, this is a serious force. I think that Georgia was overestimated in the USA, but we were not overestimated, and the transience of the war did not allow us to transfer PMCs.

    --------------------------------
    And PMCs, in your opinion, is a panacea? PMC is the same reinforced security agency. PMCs are created in order to act unofficially, and privately, on behalf of Blackwater LLC, and not on behalf of the US Congress. And in general, that's all. If the Government should report on losses in the official army, then it does not give a damn about PMCs and PMCs. We hired you, paid the money for solving the issue according to the price list, now spin as you want. PMCs also employ peculiar people, most often without a family and their death is generally indifferent to everyone. Formally, the United States withdrew its troops from Iraq, in fact, they simply transferred contracts to PMCs, which now carry out garrison and patrol service, are engaged in mine clearance and guard checkpoints. This does not affect any skills or inability, because PMCs are not obliged to obey any command from the center, if this is not stipulated in the contract.
  11. 0
    30 October 2016 18: 59
    Quote: kuz363
    Siberia, the North and the Far East will themselves fall into their own hands due to lack of supply.

    Interestingly, what to supply with?
    1. 0
      30 October 2016 20: 16
      Good question! I strongly doubt that Siberia and the Far East are somehow dependent on the EuroRF in terms of supply, if only military, well, except for nuclear weapons. If you think about it, from the Urals, over the past century, nothing good has come to Siberia.
  12. 0
    30 October 2016 21: 51
    It is all the more surprising to observe how our rulers literally grovel in front of the West, having all the trump cards in their hands. Okay, they themselves are terpils, so why should the Russian Power again be dishonored !?
  13. 0
    31 October 2016 12: 20
    the author is right, the Yankees are not warriors, but warriors ...
  14. 0
    31 October 2016 13: 31
    "Propaganda, including our own, just prevents you from seeing these facts, telling about the absolute invincibility of American weapons and the impeccable splendor of a professional army."

    The Byzantine empire was invincible while it relied on its own army (such as a conscription army). After the transition to a mercenary empire was destroyed. Those. the mercenary army is no good for protection.
  15. 0
    31 October 2016 22: 38
    The author confuses the professional army and mercenaries.
    The US Armed Forces are built on the basis of global dominance, but in reality they currently do not solve this problem, which, as mentioned above, is primarily due to the principle of acquisition. Since money can be killed, but it is impossible to die, a mercenary army has to be built in such a way as to fight without losses, that is, have absolute technological superiority over the enemy.

    It turns out that in the Russian army all the contract soldiers are mercenaries, ready to kill for money and not ready to die for their country.
    And low morale is explained by the alien purpose of the wars that the United States is now waging. Does anyone want to die in the desert on the other side of the globe for the interests of some Standart Oil, etc.? Therefore, mainly volunteers go there, go to earn money, and not die to the glory of the star-striped flag.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"