The company "Sukhoi" began flight tests of the third serial fighter Su-35С

47


Moscow, 17 January. Today from the airfield Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Production Association them. Yu.A. Gagarina (KnAAPO) took off the serial multi-purpose fighter Su-35С-3. For more than 2 hours, various modes of operation of the power plant and the integrated control system were tested. The characteristics of stability and controllability were checked. There are no comments to the operation of engines, systems and equipment. The plane was piloted by test pilot Taras Artsebarsky.

As part of the flight test program, Su-35 fighters performed more than 400 flights. The Su-35-1,2 aircraft are presented to the 929 State Flight Test Center (GLITS) for state joint tests (GSI) and from August 15 this year. embarked on an agreed program.

At the same time, the first serial Su-35-1 is connected to it. At Su-35-1,2, preliminary flight tests were performed, during which the main installed flight characteristics of the on-board equipment complex and super-maneuverability characteristics were verified, stability and controllability characteristics, propulsion system characteristics, and navigation system operation were checked. The maximum ground speed attained is 1400 km., At an altitude of 2400 km., The ceiling is 18 thousand. The target detection range in air-to-air mode is over 400 km. This is significantly higher than that of aircraft in service. On-board RLS allows you to detect and track several targets at a distance over 80 km. The complex is ready for passing tests for combat use.

Su-35 is a deeply modernized, highly maneuverable multi-purpose fighter of the “4 ++” generation. It uses fifth-generation technologies that provide superiority over fighters of a similar class. Distinctive features of the aircraft are a new avionics complex based on a digital information management system integrating on-board equipment systems, a new radar station with a phased array with a long detection range of air targets, with an increased number of simultaneously tracked and fired targets (tracking 30 and attack 8 air targets, as well as tracking 4 and attack 2 of ground targets), new engines with increased thrust and a rotary thrust vector. Su-35 has a wide range of weapons of long, medium and short range. Capable of being driven aviation anti-radar weapons, anti-radar, anti-ship, general purpose, adjustable bombs (ACS), as well as unguided anti-radar weapons.

Radar visibility fighter compared to the fourth generation aircraft reduced several times due to the electrically conductive coating of the cockpit canopy, the application of radar absorbing coatings and a reduced number of protruding sensors. Aircraft life - 6 thousand flight hours, service life - 30 years of operation, assigned life of the engines with a controlled nozzle - 4 thousand hours.


Press service of the company "Sukhoi"
Tel: (495) 940 266
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Internet address: www.sukhoi.org


    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    47 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. Igor
      -4
      18 January 2012 07: 46
      I do not understand why such a lack of machinery.
      1. Sergh
        +13
        18 January 2012 08: 24
        Igor, even a very strange question, somehow hurts the ear. Here in Libya there was no "inconsistency", yeah, it is now, and Libya is not!
        I think our pilots are far from fools and clearly understand why, why and lope! So, the question is completely off topic, but vice versa: anything bigger and better !!!
        1. 0
          18 January 2012 08: 39
          On the contrary, I don’t understand why this multifunctionality, wild price increase with averaging of characteristics, all in one and ultimately all, light maneuverable fast fighters should be separate, well-armored attack aircraft with powerful guns separately, and bomber load-lifting and inconspicuous separately, and all this should move as part of a group covering and complementing each other
          1. vitiaz
            0
            4 June 2012 14: 45
            Hello, land! Well, at least you understand the need for a variety of techniques!
        2. Igor
          -5
          18 January 2012 08: 39
          Yes, I’m talking about the fact that the Su-27, Su-30, Su-35, MIG-35 are almost one aircraft, they are not very different from each other, because of this we rivet 10 cars a year, instead in order to direct all efforts to one machine and build it at least 50 units a year.
          1. +2
            18 January 2012 09: 19
            But is su 27,30,35 not a model development? 35th, the others are being modernized, they do not duplicate each other (the 30th for export does not count), well, and in the moment HZ type support competition
            1. Igor
              -4
              18 January 2012 10: 01
              The development of models should go through the modernization of old models, and not rivet new planes, even Pindos with their military budget do not.
              Quote: Kyrgyz
              they do not duplicate each other

              If you put avionics on the Su-27, the radar and engines from the Su-35 will be the same as the Su-35.
              Quote: Kyrgyz
              30th for export does not count

              Our MO also buys these.
              Quote: Kyrgyz
              , well, in the moment HZ type support competition

              The moment is in a dying state and his life is supported artificially, he is no longer a tenant. recourse
              1. Mr. tank
                0
                18 January 2012 10: 56
                Quote: Igorek
                If you put avionics on the Su-27, the radar and engines from the Su-35 will be the same as the Su-35.

                Not really, the glider is reinforced by 35, but the engines are more powerful - to carry it all.
                1. Igor
                  -5
                  18 January 2012 11: 10
                  Small difference
                  1. Mr. tank
                    -4
                    18 January 2012 11: 30
                    Quote: Igorek
                    Small difference

                    In principle, yes, I already hinted between the letters - that the Su-35 is more likely a stillborn project.
                    And so I agree with you, it’s better 20 27CM than one 35BM
            2. +4
              18 January 2012 16: 22
              MiG is a light fighter, Su is respectively heavy!
              1. Mr. tank
                -2
                19 January 2012 01: 03
                Quote: Snake831

                Moment

                Average
                1. -1
                  19 January 2012 12: 54
                  You yourself are Medium! Your brain is medium!
          2. Sergh
            +1
            18 January 2012 10: 37
            You can’t immediately abandon the production of one and switch to another tomorrow, there are still many orders for delivery to the troops, all the more this is not a chef's kitchen. And even then, for a new dish, it’s also necessary to go to the market for new products.
            They fly around, run in, bring to mind and trample the case, smoothly replace with a new model, characteristics and tasks are almost identical.
            Fast only flies ...
            1. Igor
              -5
              18 January 2012 11: 26
              Quote: Sergh
              You can’t immediately abandon the production of one and tomorrow switch to another

              You do not tell me this, but write to the KLA, they release several planes a year.
              Quote: Sergh
              many more orders for the supply of troops

              Have hundreds begun to order?

              Quote: Sergh
              And even then, for a new dish, it’s also necessary to go to the market for new products.

              The new product is the T-50
              Quote: Sergh
              They fly around, run in, bring to mind and trample the case, smoothly replace with a new model, the characteristics and tasks are almost identical. Quickly only flies ...

              Yes, how much you can already roll around, this Su-35 has been for so many years, though it used to be called Su-37.
            2. sazhka0
              -2
              18 January 2012 12: 11
              First you need to prepare frames that can do this .. And we can not make machines on which it is necessary to do .. What to teach and whom ???
          3. Mr. tank
            -4
            18 January 2012 10: 54
            Quote: Igorek
            U-27, Su-30, Su-35, MIG-35- this is practically one plane, they are not very different from each other, because of this we rivet 10 cars a year, instead of directing all forces to one a car and build it at least 50 pieces a year.

            Su-27s need to be capitalized before the SM, and there is nowhere to produce Su-35s, the production site is littered with Superjet fuselages, some rivet 5 pieces a year.
            1. Don
              0
              18 January 2012 18: 50
              Quote: Mr. Tank
              and the Su-35 has nowhere to produce

              Nonsense. In Novosibirsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur, 10-15 per year can be released.
              1. Mr. tank
                -4
                19 January 2012 01: 23
                Don,
                , I do not like when I diyoty cross. I will speak Russian more subtly, but you are a diyot. Sit down
                1. Don
                  +1
                  19 January 2012 19: 34
                  Quote: Mr. Tank
                  I do not like when I diyoty cross. I will speak Russian more subtly, but you are a diyot. Sit down

                  Behind the bazaar follow the bastard. Knowledge 0, you do not know how to google, but a lot of balabol.
      2. Mr. tank
        -6
        18 January 2012 10: 48
        Quote: Igorek
        I do not understand why such a lack of machinery.

        Yes, in many respects the same eggs, only a side view. In fact, it is a heavy Su-27 with more powerful engines and something new on board. There is nowhere to collect it, no one is buying, money has been invested in the development, and the gimmick will not pay off - 35 has a chance to become a suitcase without a handle.
    2. Evil Tatar
      0
      18 January 2012 07: 50
      What a handsome man! Nice looking.
      Uncle Taras, ride ...
    3. 0
      18 January 2012 08: 06
      more such
    4. sazhka0
      -2
      18 January 2012 08: 38
      Are we going to do them again for someone, or all the same for ourselves? And then somehow it turns out stupidly. 1 imagine 100 in China .. Already, you do not know whether to rejoice or regret.
    5. +4
      18 January 2012 08: 42
      The machine is certainly good both externally and according to the declared characteristics, but the pace, the pace of adoption into service could have been increased.
      1. sazhka0
        -2
        18 January 2012 09: 13
        http://topwar.ru/2096-su-35-obespechit-kompanii-suxoj-konkurentosposobnost-do-vy
        xoda-na-rynok-perspektivnogo-aviacionnogo-kompleksa-frontovoj-aviacii-pak-fa.htm
        l
        I’ve picked it up .. Cry or laugh ..?
    6. 0
      18 January 2012 08: 57
      Pleasant such an instance. Willingly plus!
    7. sazhka0
      0
      18 January 2012 09: 04
      Deliveries of Su-35 for export are planned to the countries of Southeast Asia, Africa, the Middle East and South America. Among the first possible buyers of the Su-35 should be noted Libya, China and Venezuela.


      In particular, a preliminary agreement was reached with Libya on the purchase of X-NUMX Su-12 fighters. With Venezuela, negotiations are underway for the supply of 35 Su-24.

      As expected, the prospects for China’s purchases of Su-35 multi-role fighters will become clearer following the meeting of the Russian-Chinese intergovernmental commission on military-technical cooperation, which is scheduled for the end of the first decade of November.
      Everything .. it turns out that US shines nothing again))) And you can not talk about anything else
      http://topwar.ru/2096-su-35-obespechit-kompanii-suxoj-konkurentosposobnost-do-vy
      xoda-na-rynok-perspektivnogo-aviacionnogo-kompleksa-frontovoj-aviacii-pak-fa.htm
      l
      1. 0
        18 January 2012 09: 15
        The service life is 30 years, this is a 4 ++ machine, and on the approach of PAK FA of the 5th generation, it is logical that they do not want to invest in obviously new and fly on it for 30 years, they will go on upgrades for a couple of years and PAK FA will be completed when completed
        1. sazhka0
          -1
          18 January 2012 09: 33
          But after all, PAK FA also wants to sell for export .. So nothing changes .. Our bbc is back in zh_ope (((
          1. Mr. tank
            -4
            18 January 2012 11: 20
            Quote: sazhka0
            But PAK FA also wants to sell for export.

            So far they are threatening to buy first closer to themselves by 2020.
            1. sazhka0
              -3
              18 January 2012 11: 49
              The words. the words.
              1. Mr. tank
                -5
                18 January 2012 12: 10
                Quote: sazhka0
                The words. the words.

                Yes, PAK FA - no more than words.
          2. Don
            +1
            18 January 2012 19: 01
            Quote: sazhka0
            PAK FA also wants to sell for export.

            Who told you that? PAK FA just going to buy.
            1. +3
              18 January 2012 20: 04
              That's right, Don. The Ministry of Defense stated that the PAK FA will primarily go into service with the Russian Air Force. As for India, joint production will be established with it.
              1. Mr. tank
                -3
                19 January 2012 01: 26
                Quote: Nick
                As for India, joint production will be established with it.

                thin there, do not rush
            2. Mr. tank
              -3
              19 January 2012 01: 25
              Quote: Don
              Who told you that? PAK FA just going to buy.

              4 Diotamus - PAK FA and is created with "selling" money ...
              1. Don
                +4
                19 January 2012 19: 36
                Quote: Mr. Tank
                4 Diotamus - PAK FA and is created with "selling" money ...

                What nah selling money? Do you work in the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation? I would be silent fool if there is nothing clever to say.
        2. +1
          18 January 2012 10: 22
          In my opinion, this is the most maneuverable aircraft in the world and somebody will do something similar in the near future.
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIMGNM_6w7M - это даже не самолёт, а небесная формула!
          PAK FA is inferior to him in maneuverability, and indeed the purpose is different.
          Of course I would like for the 35th to be only in our fleet and a lot!
          1. sazhka0
            0
            18 January 2012 11: 18
            The problem is that about 400 hundred pieces were sold to China and India. And our troops received "h_y" yes, a little ... and after that, pounding yourself in the chest with a fist is at least stupid ... The island states have the opportunity to buy as much as necessary .. But for us oil and gas for the whole world does not allow such opportunities .. Stupid. is not it..
          2. sazhka0
            -2
            18 January 2012 11: 52
            Otkupymyayaya.))) The brigade "rules"
      2. Mr. tank
        -5
        18 January 2012 11: 19
        Quote: sazhka0
        South-East Asia

        Type Indonesia.
        Quote: sazhka0
        Africa

        Type Libya, which is not
        Quote: sazhka0
        Middle east

        Like Syria, which will not be soon
        Quote: sazhka0
        of South America

        Like Brazil, which refused him.
        Quote: sazhka0
        Negotiations are underway with Venezuela for the supply of 24 Su-35s.

        Judging by the trend, Hugo is more likely to buy a Chinese, although under a ball loan with which the Russian Federation is stuffing Venezuela - that would not be. The main thing is that there is where the Su-35 is to be collected by everyone ( smile ) - 24 pieces, this is 4 years of work in tear for the plant. (Keep more subtle information)
        1. sazhka0
          -4
          18 January 2012 12: 00
          I know, unfortunately. Therefore, I’m so angry .. YOU don’t like to .. but have to endure .. sometimes you are right .. Unfortunately ...
          1. Mr. tank
            -5
            18 January 2012 12: 15
            Quote: sazhka0
            I know, unfortunately. Therefore, I’m so angry .. I don’t like you .. but you have to endure .. sometimes you’re right

            I am always right, as in the fact that now KnAAPO can do no more than 4 a year, and this is already 6 years for amorphous Venezuela, and also the Russian state defense order, etc.
            35BM will not pay off, he does not have lobbyists - Poghosyan has lost interest in him, you won’t get any money for development. The customers are not really in line for him. Nowhere to produce - KnAAPO is littered with Boeing-French screwdriver Superjets. Poghosyan is interested in a new sawmill called PAK FA.
            - As you see, there are more than one against the most powerful factors.
            1. sazhka0
              +1
              18 January 2012 12: 40
              I have been making IL-14 in Uzbekistan for 76 years. And I know firsthand how to destroy an aircraft plant that made 72 cars a year .. I do not think that RUSSIA has gone far from this .. There are more than enough of its "specialists" here .. Break up, plunder, plunder, cut. .Really EVERYTHING IS SO BAD .. Well, what kind of bad people are we .. Or again gr.voyna. Why don't we want to live like a human? Why? Why? Berezovsky also blathers from overseas okiyana ... Crazy House ..
              1. Mr. tank
                -4
                18 January 2012 12: 51
                Quote: sazhka0
                I do not think that RUSSIA has gone far from this ..

                Further, TAPOiCh even riveted something even to Jordanians and the Volga-Dnepr, and Russia is not able to.
                Quote: sazhka0
                There are more than enough "specialists" here ..

                That’s what Russia can somehow do — it’s Su thanks to the Chinese and Indians.
        2. sazhka0
          0
          18 January 2012 13: 13
          Well, there was a link to topwar
      3. Don
        0
        18 January 2012 19: 00
        Quote: sazhka0
        Everything .. it turns out that US shines nothing again

        Until 2015, 48 updated Su-35S fighters will be produced for the Russian Air Force. The contract for the supply of 48 Su-35S aircraft to the troops of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation was signed at MAKS-2009.
        1. Mr. tank
          -3
          19 January 2012 01: 27
          Quote: Don
          Until 2015, 48 updated Su-35S fighters will be produced for the Russian Air Force. The contract for the supply of 48 Su-35S aircraft to the troops of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation was signed at MAKS-2009.

          Senya, when understanding people tell you - do not argue better.
          1. Don
            +2
            19 January 2012 19: 38
            Quote: Mr. Tank
            Senya, when understanding people tell you - do not argue better.

            Is that you and sazhka0 you call understanding people? wink I am amused.
    8. 443190
      0
      18 January 2012 10: 33
      Why is he only 3rd ??? Why not the 333rd ??? Or is it another PR ???
      1. sazhka0
        -2
        18 January 2012 11: 08
        we don’t have money for ourselves .. "sale" however .. to anyone just not to ourselves .. ALL NEW go anywhere and to anyone .. an ordinary residual principle .. "We will do ourselves some more. then .. maybe .. whenever "." SOVOK "ANYWHERE NOTHING .. And people rule" former ".. A former KGB man cannot be a" great "economist in addition to a" great "politician .. The level is not the same .. Only populism remains .. SUDDENLY ride ..
      2. 0
        April 11 2012 21: 38
        Quote: 443190
        Why is he only 3rd ??? Why not the 333rd ??? Or is it another PR ???

        Although the article says "deep modernization", in fact, this is a new aircraft: it has a different body (more magnesium alloys, and carbon fiber reinforced plastic), in production - welding instead of riveting, etc. The glider itself is lighter, with a greater maximum aircraft weight.
        And who said that in our future only PAKFA will be in fighter aviation? Even America’s 5th generation aircraft cannot be armed: it’s enough to compare the number of F-22s with the total fleet of fighter aircraft

        Total fighters ---- 2158 pieces
        of them
        F-15 Eagle --------------- 522
        F-15E Strike Eagle ------ 217
        F-16 Fighting Falcon ---- 1280
        F-22 Raptor --------------- 139
    9. +1
      18 January 2012 12: 12
      Quote: sazhka0
      The problem is that about 400 hundred pieces were sold to China and India. And our troops received "x_y" but a little

      400pcs Su35? yourself not funny? I wouldn’t even have time to produce this Irkutsk
      1. sazhka0
        -2
        18 January 2012 12: 58
        I'll dig .. I'll send ..Official reports .. Then someone is fooling someone that everything is so good with us ?? 14 years at TAPO and Ch .. No plant can "digest" so much ..
    10. coast
      +1
      18 January 2012 13: 24
      I look at you everything quickly, quickly and efficiently does not happen and not when it will not. let 3 pcs but they do and you are current and you can pick up an article, go to the plants
    11. 0
      18 January 2012 15: 05
      There is a way out! Why do people look at everything new problem ??? Su-35S once it is multi-functional, it will go to the forefront, while others, i.e. Su-27,30 ... will complement ... Although outdated, they are still useful and quite capable. True, Igor Tkachenko once said that the planes we fly on are very worn out! And there is a version that this was the cause of the accident over Zhukovsky, although this version is denied ...
      We wish good luck and success to the pilots and those who assemble the planes!
    12. ANTRAX
      0
      29 February 2012 02: 41
      super plane! and beautiful good
    13. +1
      22 March 2012 23: 29
      Looking at such shots involuntarily you think, the plane was created for ballroom dancing or for a serious fight not for show, but for life and the predominance of superiority in the air and over territories. It is probably time to move on to technology for changing the flight vectors without reducing the speed and inertia effect. At the same time, it is time to create magneto ... shells to stabilize the pilot’s physical condition in order to expand the capabilities of almost any person to fly the aircraft. Someone will say that this is fantastic. However, while a person will be equal only to those like him, then there will be no progress.
    14. Lnosow
      0
      21 June 2012 21: 58
      Yes, and to equip them with plasma generators. There are such.
      1. vitiaz
        0
        22 June 2012 04: 23
        Yes, it’s just that aliens pick up a plate and all things!
    15. +1
      21 June 2012 22: 56
      The source of energy that creates sufficient potential and the replenishment of energy giving the strength of the current is taken from the energy that is created by the resistance of the medium to flying. And this is elementary. The question is how to distribute this energy on the surfaces of the flow and it is just as simple in theory. But all this is the simplest in comparison with the fact that modern mathematical analysis cannot simultaneously combine all highly dynamic processes around the aircraft, which means that a breakthrough in the technology of moving in space will occur first, from the emergence of the desire of people to change in their worldview.
      It should be noted that plasma is an energy e-mail. magnetic "breakdown" along the energy bond vector, which creates a sufficient potential difference. And it doesn't matter if this difference is formed by chemical, mechanical or electronic. magnetically.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"